Predicting the Value of Adjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Combining the Total Number of Examined Lymph Nodes with the Positive Lymph Node Ratio

Significance of metastatic lymph nodes ratio in overall survival for patients with resected nonsmall cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The tumor, node and metastasis stage is widely applied to classify lung cancer and is the foundation of clinical decisions. However, increasing studies have pointed out that this staging system is not precise enough for the N status. In this study, we aim to build a convenient survival prediction model that incorporates the current items of lymph node status.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study and collected the data from resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (IA-IIIB) patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2006-2015). The x-tile program was applied to calculate the optimal threshold of metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR). Then, independent prognostic factors were determined by multivariable Cox regression analysis and enrolled to build a nomogram model. The calibration curve as well as the Concordance Index (C-index) were selected to evaluate the nomogram. Finally, patients were grouped based on their specified risk points and divided into three risk levels. The prognostic value of MLNR and examined lymph node numbers (ELNs) were presented in subgroups.

RESULTS TOTALLY,

40853 NSCLC patients after surgery were finally enrolled and analyzed. Age, metastatic lymph node ratio, histology type, adjuvant treatment and American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th T stage were deemed as independent prognostic parameters after multivariable Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was built using those variables, and its efficiency in predicting patients' survival was better than the conventional American Joint Committee on Cancer stage system after evaluation. Our new model has a significantly higher concordance Index (C-index) (training set, 0.683 v 0.641, respectively; P < 0.01; testing set, 0.676 v 0.638, respectively; P < 0.05). Similarly, the calibration curve shows the nomogram was in better accordance with the actual observations in both cohorts. Then, after risk stratification, we found that MLNR is more reliable than ELNs in predicting overall survival.

CONCLUSION

We developed a nomogram model for NSCLC patients after surgery. This novel and useful tool outperforms the widely used tumor, node and metastasis staging system and could benefit clinicians in treatment options and cancer control.

Accurate location describe and management of lymph node recurrence after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Describe the accurate locations of lymph node recurrence (LNR) of Chinese patients with postoperative thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is essential for determining the need for further surveillance protocols and treatments. The authors aimed to evaluate the patterns of postoperative ESCC and its current risk stratification with LNR.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included a retrospective review of the medical records and image material of patients with ESCC who underwent LNR after radical surgery between January 2013 and September 2022, with a median follow-up time of 5.71 years. Clinical features were extracted from these records, and survival analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the accurate location and range of LNR according to the nomenclature of the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. The second endpoints was to explore the related factors of recurrence range and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 3268 lymph node regions were recurrence from 1129 patients, with a mean of 2.89 regions per patient. No.104, 106, and 107 was the most common recurrence of thoracic ESCC with an LNR rate higher than 15%. In upper thoracic ESCC, No.105 was a common recurrence site and abdominal LNR was rare. In lower thoracic ESCC, retroperitoneal lymph node was a unique regions (15.4%). Anastomotic recurrence is an important recurrence pattern in patients with postoperative esophageal cancer, with an incidence of 24.5%. Rates of LNR in range of lymph node dissection was low (13.9%). The median time of LRT was 20.0 (1.5-184.0) months. High range of recurrence was associated with significantly poorer OS in patients. Multiple linear regression analysis identified demonstrated N stage, tumor differentiation, adjuvant radiotherapy, and total lymph nodes removed were association with recurrence range for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Supraclavicular and upper mediastinums lymph nodes were common recurrence site for ESCC patients, and careful initial staging and surveillance are needed. Thorough lymph node dissection may reduce the range of regional recurrence.

Positive lymph node ratio is an important index to predict long-term survival for advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma patients (II∼III) with R0 resection--a SEER-based analysis

Background

Esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most malignant cancers in the world due to nodal metastasis. Therefore, a reasonable nodal staging system is extremely important for further treatment strategies. Recently the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) is an important prognostic factor in various solid tumors.

Method

In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of the PLNR in stage II∼III ESCC patients. We collected the pathological characteristics of 272 stage II∼III ESCC patients from the SEER database from 2004-2016. ROC curves were used to calculate the best cutoff value of the PLNR; Pearson's Chi-square (χ2) and Fisher's exact probability tests were used to compare the clinical baseline and characteristics of patients. For continuous variables, Student's t-test and ANOVA were performed to evaluate statistical significance. Clinical outcomes were estimated by using the Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were utilized to analyze independent prognostic factors of ESCC patients.

Results

Consequently, advanced ESCC patients were effectively stratified into two groups by prognosis using a PLNR cutoff value of 0.15 (P value = 0.04). The median survival time of patients with PLNR <0.15 (n = 145) was much higher than that of patients (n = 127) in the PLNR ≥0.15 group (20.0 vs. 13.0 months, P value < 0.0001). Notably, the PLNR significantly predicted the prognosis of ESCC patients with stage N1 (P value 0.01) and stage III (P value < 0.001) disease. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed that T stage (HR 1.33, 95 % CI 0.97-1.82), tumor size >45 mm (HR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.02-1.70), N stage (HR 1.41, 95 % CI 0.98-2.01) and PLNR ≥0.15 (HR 1.35, 95 % CI 0.87-1.74) were independent risk factors for prognostic prediction in ESCC patients. Meanwhile, 117 II∼III ESCC patients from Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital shown that the overall survival with a PLNR <0.15 (n = 96) was significantly longer than that with a PLNR ≥0.15 (n = 21) .

Conclusions

The PLNR is useful for accurately predicting clinical outcomes and determining postoperative strategies.

Lymph node ratio and hematological parameters predict relapse-free survival in patients with high grade rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms after radical resection: a multicenter prognostic study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lymph node ratio (LNR) are reportedly related to prognosis. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical importance of the LNR and hematological parameters in patients with high grade rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-RNENs) who were undergoing radical resection.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients with HG-RNENs from 17 large-scale medical centers in China (January 1, 2010-April 30, 2022). A nomogram was constructed by using a proportional hazard model. Bootstrap method was used to draw calibration plots to validate the reproducibility of the model. Concordance index (C-Index), decision curve analysis (DCA), and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (TD-AUC) analysis were used to compare the prognostic predictive power of the new model with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) TNM staging.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients with HG-RNENs were enrolled in this study. In the 45 patients with HG-RNENs who underwent radical resection, PNI ≤ 49.13 (HR: 3.997, 95% CI: 1.379-11.581, P = 0.011), ALP > 100.0 U/L (HR: 3.051, 95% CI: 1.011-9.205, P = 0.048), and LNR > 0.40 (HR: 6.639, 95% CI: 2.224-19.817, P = 0.0007) were independent predictors of relapse-free survival. The calibration plots suggested that the nomogram constructed based on the three aforementioned factors had good reproducibility. The novel nomogram revealed a C-index superior to AJCC TNM staging (0.782 vs 0.712) and ENETS TNM staging (0.782 vs 0.657). Also, the new model performed better compared to AJCC TNM staging and ENETS TNM staging in DCA and TD-AUC analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR, ALP, and PNI were independent prognostic factors in patients with HG-RNENs after radical resection, and the combined indicator had better predictive efficacy compared with AJCC TNM staging and ENETS TNM staging.

Prognostic nomogram and risk factors for predicting survival in patients with pT2N0M0 esophageal squamous carcinoma

This study analyzed the impact of factors affecting overall survival in patients with pT2N0M0 esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) and developed a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS). We reviewed the clinical data of 413 patients with pathological T2N0M0 ESCC after radical esophagectomy in two hospitals. Data from one institution was used as the training cohort. A nomogram was established using Cox proportional hazard regression for identifying the prognostic factors affecting for OS in ESCC patients. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate prognostic efficacy, which was validated in an independent validation cohort. In the training cohort (N = 304), the median OS was 69.33 months, and the 3-, 5- and 10-year OS rates were 76.80%, 67.00% and 56.90%, respectively. The median OS of the validation cohort (N = 109) was 73.50 months, and the 3-, 5- and 10-year OS rates were 77.00%, 67.80% and 55.60%, respectively. According to Cox univariate and multivariate analyses, sex, age, tumor length and the number of resected lymph nodes were identified as predictors of OS. We developed nomograms and performed internal and external validation. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) value, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) showed good prediction ability of the nomogram. The developed nomogram can effectively predict OS after esophagectomy in patients with pT2N0M0 ESCC.

Revisiting Inhibition Effects of miR-28 as a Metastasis Suppressor in Gastrointestinal Cancers

MicroRNAs are critical epigenetic regulators that can be used as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarkers for the treatment of various diseases, including gastrointestinal cancers, among a variety of cellular and molecular biomarkers. MiRNAs have also shown oncogenic or tumor suppressor roles in tumor tissue and other cell types. Studies showed that the dysregulation of miR-28 is involved in cell growth and metastasis of gastrointestinal cancers. MiR-28 plays a key role in controlling the physiological processes of cancer cells including growth and proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis, and metastasis. Therefore, miR-28 expression patterns can be used to distinguish patient subgroups. Based on the previous studies, miR-28 expression can be a suitable biomarker to detect tumor size and predict histological grade metastasis. In this review, we summarize the inhibitory effects of miR-28 as a metastasis suppressor in gastrointestinal cancers. miR-28 plays a role as a tumor suppressor in gastrointestinal cancers by regulating cancer cell growth, cell differentiation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. As a result, using it as a prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic biomarker in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers can be a way to solve the problems in this field.

The Relationship Between Lymph Node Ratio and Survival Benefit With Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-positive Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the ratio of positive lymph nodes to total assessed lymph nodes (LNR) is an indicator of cancer burden in esophageal adenocarcinoma and may identify patients who may most benefit from AC.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to discern whether there is a threshold LNR above which AC is associated with a survival benefit in this population.

METHODS

The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent upfront, complete resection of pT1-4N1-3M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma. The primary outcome, overall survival, was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models employing an interaction term between LNR and AC.

RESULTS

A total of 1733 patients were included: 811 (47%) did not receive AC whereas 922 (53%) did. The median LNR was 20% (interquartile range 9-40). In a multivariable Cox model, the interaction term between LNR and receipt of AC was significant (P = 0.01). A plot of the interaction demonstrated that AC was associated with improved survival beyond a LNR of about 10%-12%. In a sensitivity analysis, the receipt of AC was not associated with improved survival in patients with LNR <12% (hazard ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.44) but was associated with improved survival in those with LNR ≥12% (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with upfront, complete resection of node-positive esophageal adenocarcinoma, AC was associated with improved survival for LNR ≥12%. LNR may be used as an adjunct in multidisciplinary decision-making about adjuvant therapies in this patient population.

Is Performance of Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed tomography (CT) or Contrast-enhanced CT Efficient Enough to Guide the Hilar Lymph Node Staging for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

Introduction

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced CT in the detection of hilar lymph node metastasis (LNM) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) to determine their value in guiding hilar lymph node staging and delineating radiation target volume.

Methods

Consecutive patients with ESCC who underwent both PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT before radical lymphadenectomy and esophagectomy at our institution from September 2009 to November 2018 were enrolled. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosing hilar LNM were calculated.

Results

Of the 174 patients included, contrast-enhanced CT predicted nine positive cases, while PET/CT predicted one, and eight (4.6%) were identified as pathologically positive for their resected hilar lymph nodes. The SE, SP, PPV, and NPV of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT were 0.000, 0.994, 0.000, and 0.954; and 0.125, 0.952, 0.111, and 0.958, respectively. The specificity showed a significant difference (P=0.037). PET/CT is slightly more specific than contrast-enhanced CT.

Conclusions

PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT may be useful tools for predicting the negativity of hilar LN status, but they are not recommended for guiding the hilar lymph node staging and the delineating of hilar LNM in radiotherapy planning of ESCC patients based on their low PPV.

A novel prognostic model: which group of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish a reliable model for predicting the overall survival (OS) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients and identifying the potential beneficiaries of adjuvant chemotherapy after esophagectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 819 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy as the training cohort. We constructed a prognostic model named GTLN2. Both internal and external validation tests were performed. Potential beneficiaries were defined as ESCC patients who obtained a significantly longer OS after adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized in the subgroup analysis to screen ESCC beneficiaries of adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 819 cT1b-3 patients in the training cohort. Multiple prognostic factors were associated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Using uni-/multivariate analysis, histological grade (G), tumor invasion depth (T), regional lymph node metastasis (N), and the number of cleared lymph nodes (NCLNs) were identified as independent prognostic factors. Then, we developed the GTLN2 model based on these predictors and validated it using internal calculations [the 1-, 3- and 5-year area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.692, 0.685 and 0.680, respectively; P<0.001] and external cohorts (the 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUCs were 0.651, 0.619 and 0.650, respectively; P<0.001). ESCC patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups based on their assigned risk scores. After 1:1 patient pairing was performed by PSM in the high-risk group, better OS was noted in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Differentiating high- and low-risk patient groups via a novel mathematical prediction model allows physicians to identify patients in need of adjuvant chemotherapy accurately.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Pathological Positive Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy: a Single Institute Retrospective Analysis

The need for adjuvant therapy after radical resection for patients with stage II–III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been determined. Since recurrence can occur after radical resection and since the prognosis is still poor, it is necessary to consider additional treatment strategies, including adjuvant chemotherapy. We retrospectively investigated the significance of adjuvant therapy after NAC followed by radical resection for TESCC. Between 2008 and 2018, 115 patients with clinical stage II–III underwent radical subtotal esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Among them, 62 were analyzed, excluding patients with T4 tumors and patients who had undergone R plus resection or who were receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. We compared patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy with those who only received observation; we examined overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates. Twenty-nine patients (46.7%) had lymph node metastasis, 12 of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy (41.3%). The recurrence rates for patients with and without lymph node metastasis were 55.1 % and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.0022). Among patients with lymph node metastasis, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (p = 0.9270) or OS (p = 0.5416) based on the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in 15 patients with two or more positive lymph nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy increased OS (p = 0.0404). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in clinical stage II–III TESCC patients with two or more pathological positive lymph nodes after NAC followed by radical surgery.

Consensus recommendations for the standardized histopathological evaluation and reporting after radical oesophago-gastrectomy (HERO consensus)

BACKGROUND

Variation in the approach, radicality, and quality of gastroesophageal surgery impacts patient outcomes. Pathological outcomes such as lymph node yield are routinely used as surrogate markers of surgical quality, but are subject to significant variations in histopathological evaluation and reporting. A multi-society consensus group was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for the standardized assessment of gastroesophageal cancer specimens.

METHODS

A consensus group comprised of surgeons, pathologists, and oncologists was convened on behalf of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain & Ireland. Literature was reviewed for 17 key questions. Draft recommendations were voted upon via an anonymous Delphi process. Consensus was considered achieved where >70% of participants were in agreement.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on 18 statements for all 17 questions. Twelve strong recommendations regarding preparation and assessment of lymph nodes, margins, and reporting methods were made. Importantly, there was 100% agreement that the all specimens should be reported using the Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines as the minimum acceptable dataset. In addition, two weak recommendations regarding method and duration of specimen fixation were made. Four topics lacked sufficient evidence and no recommendation was made.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus recommendations provide explicit guidance for gastroesophageal cancer specimen preparation and assessment, to provide maximum benefit for patient care and standardize reporting to allow benchmarking and improvement of surgical quality.

Consolidation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

Consolidation therapy describes dose intensification strategies or additional treatment performed following completion of the primary regimen. In the case of esophageal cancer, this applies to cases of potentially persistent disease after definitive multi-modality therapy, including surgery. Consolidation should also be considered for patients initially planned to undergo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy, but for any reason elected a nonoperative strategy during treatment. With the advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, additional options may be available for consolidation in the future.

The effect of surgery plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy on treatment in laryngeal cancer: A clinical retrospective study

PURPOSE

As a common head and neck tumor, laryngeal cancer has attracted heightened attention for its treatment and prognosis. Surgery and radiotherapy were mainly therapeutic approaches in laryngeal cancer, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was a precision treatment way in radiotherapy. However, the therapeutic effect of surgery plus IMRT in laryngeal cancer was rarely reported. This study aims to determine the effect of IMRT on the treatment of patients with laryngeal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 125 patients with laryngeal cancer were collected and retrospectively analyzed based on their clinical data and follow-up results. These patients had a clear treatment plan for surgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Smoking, lymph node metastasis, TNM staging and therapeutic approaches could affect the survival of patients with laryngeal cancer. It was shown that the laryngeal function retention rate in the simple IMRT group was significantly higher than the simple surgery group and surgery plus IMRT group. The 5-year survival rate of surgery plus IMRT, simple surgery and simple IMRT were 82.86%, 53.85% and 43.33%, respectively. The locoregional recurrences rate of surgery plus IMRT, simple surgery and simple IMRT were 14.29%, 34.62% and 43.33%.

CONCLUSION

Surgery plus IMRT was a feasible and efficacious treatment technique for patients with laryngeal cancer, which effectively prolong the survival time of patients.

Variation in histopathological assessment and association with surgical quality indicators following oesophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Histopathological outcomes, such as lymph node yield and margin positivity, are used to benchmark and assess surgical centre quality, and are reported annually by the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA) in England and Wales. The variation in pathological specimen assessment and how this affects these outcomes is not known.

METHODS

A survey of practice was circulated to all tertiary oesophagogastric cancer centres across England and Wales. Questions captured demographic data, and information on how specimens were prepared and analysed. National performance data were retrieved from the NOGCA. Survey results were compared for tertiles of lymph node yield, and circumferential and longitudinal margins.

RESULTS

Survey responses were received from 32 of 37 units (86 per cent response rate), accounting for 93.1 per cent of the total oesophagectomy volume in England and Wales. Only 5 of 32 units met or exceeded current guidelines on specimen preparation according to the Royal College of Pathologists guidelines. There was wide variation in how centres defined positive (R1) margins, and how margins and lymph nodes were assessed. Centres with the highest nodal yield were more likely to use systematic fat blocking, and to re-examine specimens when the initial load was low. Systematic blocking of lesser curve fat resulted in significantly higher rates of patients with at least 15 lymph nodes examined (91.4 versus 86.5 per cent; P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Preparation and histopathological assessment of specimens varies significantly across institutions. This challenges the validity of currently used surgical quality metrics for oesophageal and other tumours.

Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in lower Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Radical Esophagectomy: a CT-based atlas and its clinical implications for Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Background: Our previous work showed that para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis was the major failure pattern in lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LTESCC) patients who presented abdominal LN failure after curative surgery. We thereby aim to generate a computerized tomography (CT)-based documentation of PALNs and to propose a clinical target volume (CTV) for this region. Methods: Sixty-five patients were enrolled. The epicentre of each PALN was drawn onto an axial CT image of a standard patient with reference to the surrounding anatomical landmarks. A CTV for PALN was generated based on the final result of node distribution, and was evaluated for dosimetric performance in three simulated patients. Results: All the studied 248 LNs were below the level of 1.0 cm above the celiac artery (CA), and 94.76% were above the bottom of vertebra L3. Horizontally, 93.33% of the LNs in the celiac level were located within an expansion of 1.5 cm on the CA, and 94.12% of the LNs in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) level were within 1.5 cm on the left side of the SMA. Below the SMA, all the LNs were behind the left renal vein, left to the right border of the inferior vena cava, and 98.51% of the LNs were medial to the lateral surface of the left psoas major. The proposed CTV could cover 92.74% of the LNs and was dosimetrically feasible. Conclusions: The proposed CTV is the first one to focus on the high-risk area of abdominal failure in LTESCC patients after surgery and can serve as a reference in the adjuvant radiotherapy for LTESCC patients.

Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Survival Outcome in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is one of the deadliest cancers in the world. Esophagectomy remains the principal treatment, and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been performed worldwide. This study aimed to clarify whether the lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) to examined, is a prognostic factor for ESCC after MIE.

METHODS

This study included 327 MIEs with the patient in the prone position at two institutions from 2010 to 2015. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses using clinicopathologic characteristics and the LNR were performed for the pN1 patients and the whole cohort.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis for all stages, independent prognostic factors were depth of tumor invasion (P < 0.0001), LNR (P = 0.014), operative time (P = 0.003), and pneumonia (P = 0.012). In the analysis of the pN1 subgroup, the optimum LNR cutoff level for overall survival (OS) was 9 based on receiver operation characteristic analysis. The LNR was significantly associated with depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.004) and number of metastatic LNs (P < 0.0001). The OS curve for the group with an LNR of 9 or higher was significantly worse than for the group with an LNR lower than 9 (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the LNR is a unique independent prognostic factor for the pN1 subgroup (hazard ratio, 6.811; 95% confidence interval, 2.009-23.087; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The LNR is an independent prognostic factor in ESCC after MIE. Especially for patients with pN1 status, the LNR is more useful than the number of metastatic LNs for predicting survival outcome.

Optimal Range of Lymphadenectomy in Pathological Stage T1 and T2 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is a primary contributor to tumor progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the appropriate number of lymph nodes to be dissected in pT1-2Nany stage ESCC to achieve the best prognosis and avoid missing positive lymph nodes (PLNs).

METHODS

A total of 497 patients with pT1 to pT2 esophageal cancer from two institutions were retrospectively analyzed and their surgical and pathological records were critically reviewed. Stepwise analyses were conducted by calculating a serial of hazard ratios and odd ratios to determine the optimal range of lymphadenectomy for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The best survival outcome can be obtained when the number of lymph node examined (NLNE) is 10-18 in pT1N0 ESCC, while the NLNE should exceed 24 in pT2N0 diseases. In patients with pT1-2Nany and pT2Nany ESCC, resection of 15-25 and 24-37 lymph nodes, respectively, could provide significant added value for identifying positive nodal metastasis. When the NLNE exceeds this appropriate range, resection of extra lymph node is not helpful to improve the probability of finding PLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

For ESCC patients undergoing radical esophagectomy, the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy is 15-25 for pT1Nany disease and 24-37 for pT2Nany disease.

Adjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Adjuvant therapy for completely resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is less commonly applied in clinical practice than neoadjuvant therapy, but it plays a substantial role in improving survival for esophageal cancer patients. This article presents a concise review of the evidence regarding adjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and future directions, particularly immunotherapy.

Significance of examined lymph nodes number and metastatic lymph nodes ratio in overall survival and adjuvant treatment decision in resected laryngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The value of adjuvant therapy in resected laryngeal cancer remains controversial. This large SEER-based cohort study aimed to investigate the existing parameters of lymph node status that could predict survival outcomes and the prognostic value of adjuvant treatment in resected laryngeal carcinoma.

METHODS

Population-based data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER-18) Program on patients after laryngectomy and lymphadenectomy (2004-2015) were analyzed. The optimal cut-off values for examined lymph nodes number (ELNs) and metastatic lymph nodes ratio (MLNR) were determined using the X-tile program. Associations of ELNs and MLNR with overall survival were investigated through Cox regression analysis. A survival-predicting model was then constructed to stratified patients. The prognostic value of adjuvant therapy was evaluated in different subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 2122 patients with resected laryngeal cancer were analyzed. A novel survival-predicting model was proposed based on ELNs, MLNR, and other clinicopathological characteristics. Patients were stratified into three subgroups with the increasing risk of death. Only patients in the high-risk group who receiving adjuvant treatment had a significantly better survival outcome than those receiving surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

A new survival-predicting model was established in this study, which was superior in assessing the survival outcomes of patients with resected laryngeal cancer. Notably, this model was also able to assist in the decision making of adjuvant therapy for patients and physicians.

Preoperative leukocytosis is associated with increased tumor-infiltrating neutrophil extracellular traps and worse outcomes in esophageal cancer

Background

We evaluated the correlation between preoperative white blood cell (WBC) count and the prognosis in esophageal cancer (EC) patients who underwent esophagectomy, and explored the potential link between preoperative WBC count and tumor-infiltrating neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in EC.

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2017, 3,096 patients at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) undergoing esophagectomy for EC were enrolled in this retrospective cohort. The prognostic value of preoperative WBC count together with tumor-infiltrating NETs was investigated.

Results

Leukocytosis (≥10,000/µL) was significantly associated with decreased overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P<0.05). Further, moderate leukocytosis (≥7,000/µL) were also identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival. Additionally, moderate leukocytosis was correlated with male sex (P=0.006), advanced T stage (P<0.001), TNM stage (P<0.001) and ineffective postoperative chemotherapy (P<0.001), and moderate leukocytosis even predicted increased relapse postoperatively (P<0.001). Importantly, patients with moderate leukocytosis had a significantly higher level of intra-tumoral NETs infiltration (P<0.001), and the higher level of NETs infiltration were associated with worse OS and DFS (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Our data indicated that preoperative moderate leukocytosis is associated with increased tumor-infiltrating NETs and is an independent prognostic factor for survival in EC after surgery.