Surgical and Oncological Outcomes After Preoperative FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: An International Multicenter Cohort Study

Surgical outcomes of histopathological stage I pancreatic cancer with special reference to oncological differences between pStage I and ypStage I cases

OBJECTIVES

Histopathological stage I pancreatic cancer (PC) consists of four entities according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 8th staging system: pStage IA (cases underwent up-front surgery, pT1 [tumor size ≤20 mm] pN0), pStage IB (cases underwent up-front surgery, pT2 [20 mm < tumor size ≤40 mm] pN0), ypStage IA and IB (i.e., underwent neoadjuvant treatment [NAT]). This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes in patients with histopathological stage I PC ((y)pStage I).

METHODS

Patients with PC who underwent resection and were diagnosed with (y)pStage I were included in this study (n = 121). We evaluated and compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among these four categories: pStage I vs. ypStage I, (y)pStage IA vs. IB, ypStage IA vs. IB, and pStage IA vs. IB.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the prognosis between pStage I and ypStage I cases, even though ypStage I included more advanced cases at NAT initiation. For pStage I (n = 25), no differences in prognosis were noted between pStage IA and IB (median RFS, 24 vs. 21 months, p = 0.871; median OS, 49.5 vs. 35.5 months, p = 0.213). However, in the ypStage I cohort (n = 96), there was significantly better RFS in ypStage IA (median RFS, 42 vs. 14 months, p = 0.0114; median OS, 52 vs. 36 months, p = 0.250).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was comparable between pStage I and ypStage I cohorts, although the subcategories within each cohort (IA vs. IB) had different clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes.

Prognostic impact of dose reduced S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The standard adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in Japan is S-1; however, the impact of dose reduction on prognosis remains unclear. We have reported that total dose intensity (TDI) ≥ 62.5% indicates good prognosis. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the prognostic impact of TDI ≥ 62.5% and reduced dosing in patients who underwent radical resection for PDAC across three institutions.

METHOD

Patients were grouped into high-TDI (≥ 62.5%) and low-TDI (< 62.5%) based on this cutoff. We performed an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted analysis and calculated relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). OS was also calculated for high TDI with TDI < 100% and TDI = 100%.

RESULT

Among 487 patients, 274 were included: 152 in the low-TDI and 122 in high-TDI groups. Patient background was adjusted using IPTW based on factors that might influence TDI. The median RFS for low- and high-TDI was 8 and 18 months, respectively (p = 0.004). The median OS of low- and high-TDI groups was 20 and 50 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Among patients with high TDI, OS did not differ between those with TDI < 100% and those with TDI = 100% (median, 47 vs. 72 months, p = 0.208).

CONCLUSION

It has been suggested that a partial dose reduction of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for PDAC does not significantly impact prognosis.

Prognostic factors in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prognostic markers for overall survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are well established but remain unclear following neoadjuvant therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine factors associated with overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from January 2010 until May 2024. Studies that reported univariable and multivariable hazard ratios were included if patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy and resection for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse-variance random-effects models.

RESULTS

Among 2208 unique articles identified by the search, 92 were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 85 were of "good" and 7 of "poor" quality. The neoadjuvant therapy regimen was described in 84 studies of which 62 included patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Margin status, nodal disease, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage, and normalization of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) after neoadjuvant therapy were prognostic for overall survival, whereas age, sex, perineural invasion, baseline tumor size, and baseline CA19-9 were not. The test for subgroup differences between ypN substages was not statistically significant in the multivariable model. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with better survival than other regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis identified margin status, nodal disease, AJCC T-stage, and normalization of CA19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy as prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with resected localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy.

Outcomes of patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent conversion surgery after FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study (PC-CURE-1)

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of conversion surgery (CS) after FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) remains unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled patients, between 2014 and 2018, with initially locally advanced or metastatic PC who were considered candidates for CS following FOLFIRINOX or GnP chemotherapy. They were classified into surgery (207 patients [194 resection and 13 exploratory laparotomy only]) and continued chemotherapy (10 patients, control) groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the day of diagnosis of potentially curative resection on imaging studies, with an expected hazard ratio (HR) of 0.7.

RESULTS

OS in the surgery group was longer than that in the control group (HR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.93). The median OS was 34.4 (95% CI: 27.9-43.4) and 19.8 (95% CI: 14.9-31.1) months in the surgery and control groups, respectively. The Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa postoperative complication and in-hospital mortality rates were 19.6% and 0.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative chemotherapy duration was not associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

CS, following a favorable response to FOLFIRINOX or GnP chemotherapy, improved initially unresectable PC prognosis (specifically, OS), regardless of the chemotherapy duration.

Nationwide Use and Outcome of Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Several international high-volume centers have reported good outcomes after resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) following chemo(radio)therapy, but it is unclear how this translates to nationwide clinical practice and outcome. This study aims to assess the nationwide use and outcome of resection of LAPC following induction chemo(radio)therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study including all patients who underwent resection for LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy in all 16 Dutch pancreatic surgery centers (2014-2020), registered in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. LAPC is defined as arterial involvement > 90° and/or portomesenteric venous > 270° involvement or occlusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 142 patients underwent resection for LAPC, of whom 34.5% met the 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. FOLFIRINOX was the most commonly (93.7%) used chemotherapy [median 5 cycles (IQR 4-8)]. Venous and arterial resections were performed in 51.4% and 14.8% of patients. Most resections (73.9%) were performed in high-volume centers (i.e., ≥ 60 pancreatoduodenectomies/year). Overall median volume of LAPC resections/center was 4 (IQR 1-7). In-hospital/30-day major morbidity was 37.3% and 90-day mortality was 4.2%. Median OS from diagnosis was 26 months (95% CI 23-28) and 5-year OS 18%. Surgery in high-volume centers [HR = 0.542 (95% CI 0.318-0.923)], ypN1-2 [HR = 3.141 (95% CI 1.886-5.234)], and major morbidity [HR = 2.031 (95% CI 1.272-3.244)] were associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy is infrequently performed in the Netherlands, albeit with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and OS. Given these findings, a structured nationwide approach involving international centers of excellence would be needed to improve selection of patients with LAPC for surgical resection following induction therapy.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines

For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.

Unplanned conversions of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: short-term outcomes and suggested stepwise approach for a safe conversion

OBJECTIVE

With the increased adoption of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, the effects of unplanned conversions to an 'open' operation are ill-defined. This study aims to describe the impact of unplanned conversions of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy on short-term outcomes and suggest a stepwise approach for safe unplanned conversions during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

This is an analysis of 400 consecutive patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single high-volume institution. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD), and significance is accepted with 95% probability.

RESULTS

Between November 2012 and February 2023, 184 (46%) women and 216 (54%) men, aged 70 (68 ± 11.0) years, underwent a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Unplanned conversions occurred in 42 (10.5%) patients; 18 (5%) were converted due to unanticipated vascular involvement, 13 (3%) due to failure to obtain definitive control of bleeding, and 11 (3%) due to visceral obesity. Men were more likely to require a conversion than women (29 vs. 13, p = 0.05). Conversions were associated with shorter operative time (376 (323 ± 182.2) vs. 434 (441 ± 98.7) min, p < 0.0001) but higher estimated blood loss (675 (1010 ± 1168.1) vs. 150 (196 ± 176.8) mL, p < 0.0001). Patients that required an unplanned conversion had higher rates of complications with Clavien-Dindo scores of   III-V (31% vs. 12%, p = 0.003), longer length of stay (8 (11 ± 11.6) vs. 5 (7 ± 6.2), p = 0.0005), longer ICU length of stay (1 (2 ± 5.1) vs. 0 (0 ± 1.3), p < 0.0001) and higher mortality rates (21% vs. 4%, p = 0.0001). The conversion rate significantly decreased over time (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned conversions of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy significantly and negatively affect short-term outcomes, including postoperative mortality. Men were more likely to require a conversion than women. The unplanned conversions rates significantly decreased over time, implying that increased proficiency and patient selection may prevent unplanned conversions. An unplanned conversion should be undertaken in an organized stepwise approach to maximize patient safety.

Prognostic impact of resection margin status on survival after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A greater than 1 mm tumour-free resection margin (R0 >1 mm) is a prognostic factor in upfront-resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. After neoadjuvant treatment (NAT); however, the prognostic impact of resection margin (R) status remains controversial.

METHODS

Randomised and non-randomised studies assessing the association of R status and survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after NAT were sought by systematic searches of MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL. Hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% CI were collected to generate log HR using the inverse-variance method. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed and the results presented as weighted HR. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were conducted to account for different surgical procedures and varying length of follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with a total of 4929 patients were included. Based on univariable data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.57-1.97; P<0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001). Using adjusted data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001) and DFS (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30-2.39; P=0.0003). Results for R1 direct were comparable in the entire cohort; however, no prognostic impact was detected in sensitivity analysis including only partial pancreatoduodenectomies.

CONCLUSION

After NAT, a tumour-free margin greater than 1 mm is independently associated with improved OS as well as DFS in patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

A Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Trial of Ablative 5-Fraction Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided On-Table Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance may facilitate safe ultrahypofractionated radiation dose escalation for inoperable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a prospective study evaluating the safety of 5-fraction Stereotactic MR-guided on-table Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for locally advanced (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with LAPC or BRPC were eligible for this multi-institutional, single-arm, phase 2 trial after ≥3 months of systemic therapy without evidence of distant progression. Fifty gray in 5 fractions was prescribed on a 0.35T MR-guided radiation delivery system. The primary endpoint was acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity definitely attributed to SMART.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six patients (LAPC 56.6%, BRPC 43.4%) were enrolled between January 2019 and January 2022. Mean age was 65.7 (36-85) years. Head of pancreas lesions were most common (66.9%). Induction chemotherapy mostly consisted of (modified)FOLFIRINOX (65.4%) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (16.9%). Mean CA19-9 after induction chemotherapy and before SMART was 71.7 U/mL (0-468). On-table adaptive replanning was performed for 93.1% of all delivered fractions. Median follow-up from diagnosis and SMART was 16.4 and 8.8 months, respectively. The incidence of acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity possibly or probably attributed to SMART was 8.8%, including 2 postoperative deaths that were possibly related to SMART in patients who had surgery. There was no acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity definitely related to SMART. One-year overall survival from SMART was 65.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of this study was met with no acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity definitely attributed to ablative 5-fraction SMART. Although it is unclear whether SMART contributed to postoperative toxicity, we recommend caution when pursuing surgery, especially with vascular resection after SMART. Additional follow-up is ongoing to evaluate late toxicity, quality of life, and long-term efficacy.