Elucidation of the Electrocatalytic Nitrite Reduction Mechanism by Bio-Inspired Copper Complexes

Mononuclear copper complexes relevant to the active site of copper nitrite reductases (CuNiRs) are known to be catalytically active for the reduction of nitrite. Yet, their catalytic mechanism has thus far not been resolved. Here, we provide a complete description of the electrocatalytic nitrite reduction mechanism of a bio-inspired CuNiR catalyst Cu(tmpa) (tmpa = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) in aqueous solution. Through a combination of electrochemical studies, reaction kinetics, and density functional theory (DFT) computations, we show that the protonation steps take place in a stepwise manner and are decoupled from electron transfer. The rate-determining step is a general acid-catalyzed protonation of a copper-ligated nitrous acid (HNO2) species. In view of the growing urge to convert nitrogen-containing compounds, this work provides principal reaction parameters for efficient electrochemical nitrite reduction. This contributes to the investigation and development of nitrite reduction catalysts, which is crucial to restore the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle.

N2O Formation via Reductive Disproportionation of NO by Mononuclear Copper Complexes: A Mechanistic DFT Study

The mechanism of the copper(I)-mediated reductive disproportionation reaction of NO to form N₂O was investigated for five different 3,5-substituted tris(pyrazolyl)borate copper complexes (CuTp^R₁,R₂) by means of DFT calculations. A thorough search of the potential surface was performed, using the B3LYP functional with the def2-SVP basis set for optimization purposes and def2-TZVP single-point calculations for constructing the potential energy surface for two of these complexes. The results can be condensed into six competing reaction mechanisms, two of which were more closely investigated using full def2-TZVP optimized potential and free energies. The results consistently predict the same mechanism to have the lowest overall barrier. For all five different complexes, this is found to be in good agreement with the experimental reaction barriers. The key intermediate for the transition from the N-bound reactant to the O-bound product contains a stable (NO)₃ unit with one N-Cu and one O-Cu bond, which was not included in the mechanistic considerations reported in the literature. Further analysis of the charge distribution and the spin density demonstrates the formation of a Cu(II)-(N₂O₂^-) intermediate and the electronic influence of the different ligands.

Elucidating the mechanism for the reduction of nitrite by copper nitrite reductase—A contribution from quantum chemical studies

Density functional methods have been applied to investigate the properties of the active site of copper-containing nitrite reductases and possible reaction mechanisms for the enzyme catalysis. The results for a model of the active site indicate that a hydroxyl intermediate is not formed during the catalytic cycle, but rather a state with a protonated nitrite bound to the reduced copper. Electron affinity calculations indicate that reduction of the T2 copper site does not occur immediately after nitrite binding. Proton affinity calculations are indicative of substantial pK(a) differences between different states of the T2 site. The calculations further suggest that the reaction does not proceed until uptake of a second proton from the bulk solution. They also indicate that Asp-92 may play both a key role as a proton donor to the substrate, and a structural role in promoting catalysis. In the D92N mutant another base, presumably a nearby histidine (His-249) may take the role as the proton donor. On the basis of these model calculations and available experimental evidence, an ordered reaction mechanism for the reduction of nitrite is suggested. An investigation of the binding modes of the nitric oxide product and the nitrite substrate to the model site has also been made, indicating that nitric oxide prefers to bind in an end-on fashion to the reduced T2 site.

Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of Model Complexes of Copper Nitrite Reductase

The copper(I) and copper(II) complexes with the nitrogen donor ligands bis[(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)methyl]amine (1-BB), bis[2-(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)ethyl]amine (2-BB), N-acetyl-2-BB (AcBB), and tris[2-(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)ethyl]nitromethane (TB) have been studied as models for copper nitrite reductase. The copper(II) complexes form adducts with nitrite and azide that have been isolated and characterized. The Cu(II)-(1-BB) and Cu(II)-AcBB complexes are basically four-coordinated with weak axial interaction by solvent or counterion molecules, whereas the Cu(II)-(2-BB) and Cu(II)-TB complexes prefer to assume five-coordinate structures. A series of solid state structures of Cu(II)-(1-BB) and -(2-BB) complexes have been determined. [Cu(1-BB)(DMSO-O)(2)](ClO(4))(2): triclinic, P&onemacr; (No. 2), a = 9.400(1) Å, b = 10.494(2) Å, c = 16.760(2) Å, alpha = 96.67(1) degrees, beta = 97.10(1) degrees, gamma = 108.45(1) degrees, V = 1534.8(5) Å(3), Z = 2, number of unique data [I >/= 3sigma(I)] = 4438, number of refined parameters = 388, R = 0.058. [Cu(1-BB)(DMSO-O)(2)](BF(4))(2): triclinic, P&onemacr; (No. 2), a = 9.304(5) Å, b = 10.428(4) Å, c = 16.834(8) Å, alpha = 96.85(3) degrees, beta = 97.25(3) degrees, gamma = 108.21(2) degrees, V = 1517(1) Å(3), Z = 2, number of unique data [I >/= 2sigma(I)] = 3388, number of refined parameters = 397, R = 0.075. [Cu(1-BB)(DMSO-O)(NO(2))](ClO(4)): triclinic, P&onemacr; (No. 2), a = 7.533(2) Å, b = 8.936(1) Å, c = 19.168(2) Å, alpha = 97.66(1) degrees, beta = 98.62(1) degrees, gamma = 101.06(1) degrees, V = 1234.4(7) Å(3), Z = 2, number of unique data [I >/= 2sigma(I)] = 3426, number of refined parameters = 325, R = 0.081. [Cu(2-BB)(MeOH)(ClO(4))](ClO(4)): triclinic, P&onemacr; (No. 2), a = 8.493(3) Å, b = 10.846(7) Å, c = 14.484(5) Å, alpha = 93.71(4) degrees, beta = 103.13(3) degrees, gamma = 100.61(4) degrees, V = 1270(1) Å(3), Z = 2, number of unique data [I>/= 2sigma(I)] = 2612, number of refined parameters = 352, R = 0.073. [Cu(2-BB)(N(3))](ClO(4)): monoclinic, P2(1)/n (No. 14), a = 12.024(3) Å, b = 12.588(5) Å, c = 15.408(2) Å, beta = 101,90(2) degrees, V = 2282(1) Å(3), Z = 4, number of unique data [I >/= 2sigma(I)] = 2620, number of refined parameters = 311, R = 0.075. [Cu(2-BB)(NO(2))](ClO(4))(MeCN): triclinic, P&onemacr; (No. 2), a = 7.402(2) Å, b = 12.500(1) Å, c = 14.660(2) Å, alpha = 68.14(1) degrees, beta = 88.02(2) degrees, gamma = 78.61(1) degrees, V = 1233.0(4) Å(3), Z = 2, number of unique data [I>/= 2sigma(I)] = 2088, number of refined parameters = 319, R = 0.070. In all the complexes the 1-BB or 2-BB ligands coordinate the Cu(II) cations through their three donor atoms. The complexes with 2-BB appear to be more flexible than those with 1-BB. The nitrito ligand is bidentate in [Cu(2-BB)(NO(2))](ClO(4))(MeCN) and essentially monodentate in [Cu(1-BB)(DMSO-O)(NO(2))](ClO(4)). The copper(I) complexes exhibit nitrite reductase activity and react rapidly with NO(2)(-) in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of acid to give NO and the corresponding copper(II) complexes. Under the same conditions the reactions between the copper(I) complexes and NO(+) yield the same amount of NO, indicating that protonation and dehydration of bound nitrite are faster than its reduction. The NO evolved from the solution was detected and quantitated as the [Fe(EDTA)(NO)] complex. The order of reactivity of the Cu(I) complexes in the nitrite reduction process is [Cu(2-BB)](+) > [Cu(1-BB)](+) > [Cu(TB)](+) > [Cu(AcBB)](+).