Timing of Treatment Initiation With Oral Anticoagulants for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Timing of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients after acute ischaemic stroke and outcome after 3 months: results of the multicentre Berlin Atrial Fibrillation Registry

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is key in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) but there is uncertainty regarding the optimal timing of OAC (re)initiation after stroke, as recent large randomised controlled trials have methodological weaknesses and excluded stroke patients on therapeutic anticoagulation at stroke onset as well as patients started on a vitamin K antagonist after stroke. The '1-3-6-12 days rule', based on expert consensus and referring to stroke severity, was used in clinical practice to initiate OAC after acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) since publication in 2013.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed whether compliance to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' was associated with the composite endpoint (recurrent stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, major bleeding or all-cause death).

RESULTS

Among 708 registry patients with known AF before stroke and hospitalisation within 72 hours after stroke, 432 were anticoagulated at stroke onset. OAC was started according to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' in 255 (39.2%) patients. Non-adherence to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' was not associated with the composite endpoint within 3 months in 661 patients who (re-)started on OAC (log-rank test: p=0.74).Results were similar for 521 patients (re)started on a non-vitamin K-dependent OAC.

CONCLUSION

(Re)starting OAC after stroke followed the '1-3-6-12 days rule' in about 40% of all patients with AF, and more often in those anticoagulated at stroke onset. Adherence to the '1-3-6-12 days rule' did not reduce the composite clinical endpoint, if OAC was restarted within 3 months of stroke/TIA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02306824.

Prognostic analysis of different therapeutic regimens in patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism

BACKGROUND

Few studies focused on the functional outcomes of patients at 3 months after receiving intravenous thrombolysis, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy within 4.5 h of onset of the cardiogenic cerebral embolism (CCE) subtype.

METHODS

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyse the clinical data of patients with acute CCE and compare the 3-month functional prognoses of patients after administration of different antithrombotic therapies within 4.5 h of stroke onset. A total of 335 patients with CCE hospitalized in our institution were included in this study. The patients were stratified according to the hyperacute treatment received, and baseline clinical and laboratory data were analysed. A 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 was defined as an excellent functional outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients were divided into thrombolytic (n = 78), anticoagulant (n = 88), and antiplatelet therapy groups (n = 169). A total of 164 patients had a good prognosis at 3 months (mRS ≤ 2). After adjustments were made for age and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, each group comprised 38 patients, and there were no significant differences in sex composition, complications, lesion characteristics, or Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OSCP) classification among the three groups. The plasma D-dimer level (µg/ml) in the thrombolytic group was significantly higher than those in the anticoagulant and antiplatelet groups [3.07 (1.50,5.62), 1.33 (0.95,1.89), 1.61 (0.76,2.96), P < 0.001]. After one week of treatment, the reduction in NIHSS in the thrombolytic group was significantly greater than those in the other two groups [3.00 (1.00, 8.00), 1.00 (0.00, 5.00), 1.00 (0.00, 2.00), P = 0.025]. A total of 47 patients (41.2 %) had an mRS score of ≤ 2 at 3 months, and 23 patients died (20.2 %). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with a good prognosis or the mortality rate among the three groups (P = 0.363, P = 0.683).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombolytic therapy is effective at improving short-term and 3-month prognoses. Anticoagulant therapy may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with the cardiac stroke subtype who fail to receive intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) thrombolysis within 4.5 h in addition to antiplatelet therapy, as recommended by the guidelines.

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants as first-line regimen for acute ischemic stroke with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

There are various patterns in determining the choice of the first-line antithrombotic agent for acute stroke with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We investigated the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants as first-line antithrombotics for patients with acute stroke and non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within 24 h from stroke onset were included. On the basis of the first regimen used and the regimen within 7 days after admission, the study population was divided into three groups: 1) antiplatelet switched to warfarin (A-W), 2) antiplatelet switched to NOAC (A-N), and 3) NOAC only (N only). We compared the occurrence of early neurologic deterioration, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, systemic bleeding, and poor functional outcome at 90 days.

RESULTS

Of 314 included patients, 164, 53, and 97 were classified into the A-W, A-N, and N only groups, respectively. Early neurologic deterioration was most frequently observed in the A-W group (9.1%), followed by the A-N (5.7%) and N only (1.0%) groups (p = 0.017). Multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders demonstrated that the N only group was independently associated with a lower rate of early neurologic deterioration (odds ratio [OR] 0.104, 95% CI 0.013-0.831) or poor functional outcome at 90 days (OR 0.450, 95% CI 0.215-0.940) than the A-W group. However, the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or any systemic bleeding event did not differ among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Using non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants as the first-line regimen for acute ischemic stroke may help prevent early neurologic deterioration without increasing the bleeding risk.

Early initiation of direct anticoagulation after stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The safety of early initiation of anticoagulant therapy in patients with ischaemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We investigated the safety of early initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or no anticoagulation.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective, single-centre study included consecutive patients with recent (<4 weeks) ischaemic stroke and AF. The primary outcome was the rate of major (intracranial and extracranial) bleeding in patients on different treatment schemes, i.e. DOACs, VKAs and not anticoagulated. We also investigated the rate of ischaemic cerebrovascular events and mortality.

RESULTS

We included 959 consecutive patients with AF and ischaemic stroke followed up for an average of 16.1 days after the index event. A total of 559 out of 959 patients (58.3%) were anticoagulated with either VKAs (n = 259) or DOACs (n = 300). Anticoagulation was started after a mean of 7 ± 9.4 days in the DOAC group and 11.9 ± 19.7 days in the VKA group. Early initiation of any anticoagulant was not associated with an increased risk of any major bleeding [odds ratio (OR), 0.49; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.21-1.16] and in particular of intracranial bleeding (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17-1.29; P = 0.143) compared with no anticoagulation. In contrast to VKAs (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.28-2.13), treatment with DOACs (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10-0.96) reduced the rate of major bleeding compared with no anticoagulation. Early recurrences of ischaemic stroke did not differ significantly among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Starting DOACs within a mean of 7 days after stroke appeared to be safe. Randomized controlled studies are needed to establish the added efficacy of starting anticoagulation early after stroke.

Ischemic stroke and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: When to introduce anticoagulant therapy?

About 20 to 30% of ischemic strokes are related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This type of situation is particularly at risk for both recurrence of the ischemic event and the hemorrhagic transformation of this stroke. The timing of the introduction or going back to the anticoagulant therapy in these patients remains a difficult issue, with a complex benefit-risk balance that needs to be assessed. Randomized controlled studies are lacking and current recommendations do not allow for clear decision making. The administration of a curative anticoagulant within 72 hours after the event is not recommended in the absence of demonstrated efficacy in preventing recurrence at this stage and because of the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. This attitude can nevertheless be qualified by a transient accident or ischemic accident of very small size, and in the absence of any other risk factor for intra- or extra-cerebral hemorrhage. From the 4th day, after an appropriate case by case evaluation, the introduction of anticoagulant would be possible within a time which will remain at the appreciation of the medical teams. If the patient's risk of an intracerebral hemorrhage or general bleeding is transiently increased, it will be preferable to wait at least 2 weeks after the stroke. If this risk persists in the long term, the decision of the administration or not of an anticoagulant will have to be made with a multidisciplinary consultation. Vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants may be prescribed as first-line therapy for the prevention of recurrence of ischemic stroke in a non-valvular atrial fibrillation patient. The choice will be based on the clinical and biological data of each patient. Direct oral anticoagulants have not shown superiority in the prevention of ischemic recurrence but open up new prospects for earlier treatment if their lesser risk of bleeding is confirmed after further studies.

Timing of Initiation of Oral Anticoagulation after Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who suffer an acute ischemic stroke are at risk for both hemorrhagic transformation and recurrent ischemic stroke in the acute post-stroke period. Oral anticoagulants are recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF. The optimal time to initiate anticoagulant therapy after acute ischemic stroke in patients with AF is uncertain. There is concern that early initiation increases the risk of hemorrhagic transformation, whereas delayed initiation leaves the patient at risk for recurrent ischemic stroke. In this article, we provide a review of the risk of hemorrhagic transformation of acute ischemic stroke as well as review the literature and major guidelines addressing the timing of anticoagulation initiation after an acute ischemic stroke in patients with AF. Relevant articles published from 1990 to the present were identified using the PubMed and Embase databases. The majority of available literature is observational data. Large ischemic lesions, cerebral microbleeds, thrombolytic therapy, and other clinical factors may increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation of an acute ischemic stroke. Parenteral anticoagulation within 48 hours is associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation and is not recommended. Insufficient data exist to support the safety of routine oral anticoagulant (direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin) initiation within 48 hours of an acute ischemic stroke. Direct oral anticoagulant initiation within 2 days of an acute ischemic stroke is associated with a 5% rate of hemorrhagic transformation. Infarct size and presence of hemorrhage are important factors in identifying the optimal time to initiation and should guide decisions when available. A recommended framework for patient decision making is provided. Randomized controlled trials in this area are needed to identify the optimal timing of anticoagulation initiation, and such trials are under way.

Practice Variations in the Use of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke among Stroke Neurologists in Saudi Arabia

Clinical trials have demonstrated that novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are noninferior to warfarin in preventing nonvalvular atrial fibrillation- (nvAF-) related stroke and systemic embolism. However, in these trials, NOACs initiation was delayed for a variable period after stroke. Herein, we aimed to investigate the variability in early initiation of NOACs after nvAF-related stroke among stroke neurologists in Saudi Arabia. A standardized questionnaire was distributed electronically to all the stroke neurologists and fellows in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire primarily focused on the timing of NOACs initiation after an nvAF-related stroke, according to stroke size (small, medium, and large) and location (anterior or posterior circulation). Thirty-six (85.7%) of the 42 stroke neurologists, who were contacted, participated in the survey. All participants would initiate NOACs in the first 3 days after a TIA; most of them initiate NOACs within 7 days after a small stroke, 4-14 days after a medium stroke, and ≥12 days after a large stroke, regardless of stroke location. Presence of a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage further delayed initiation of NOACs. Additionally, 77.8% of the participants would bridge with antiplatelets before initiation of NOACs, and 55.6% would use a single antiplatelet agent. In conclusion, the practice of stroke neurologists is consistent with and supports the available evidence from observational studies on the time of initiation of NOACs. Our findings provide a guide for clinicians who manage nvAF-related stroke until more robust evidence from randomized controlled trials is available.

Direct oral anticoagulants in the early phase of non valvular atrial fibrillation-related acute ischemic stroke: focus on real life studies

Strong evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the early phase of non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)-related acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is lacking, because this kind of patients were excluded from phase III randomized clinical trials (RCT) and ad hoc RCTs are ongoing. In the latest years a lot of real life studies on this topic have been published. The aim of our review was to focus on these. We reviewed the PubMed databases searching articles reporting on DOACs starting time within 2 weeks from AIS onset. We selected fifteen studies, eight with retrospective, six with prospective observational and one with a prospective, open-label, single arm design. Overall, 2920 patients (47.8% females) were included. In twelve studies median or mean age of patients was over 75 years. Mean or median NIHSS ad hospital admission was ≤ 12 in all studies. About one-third of patients (32.4%) received urgent reperfusion by systemic thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. About one-fifth of patients (22.8%) had large infarct size. Median starting time of DOACs was reported in thirteen studies and it ranged from 2 to 8 days. About one-half of patients (45.9%) received a low dose of DOACs. In studies reporting on median or mean CHA₂DS₂-VASC score, it was ≥ 3 in all. In studies reporting on median or mean HAS-BLED score, it was ≥ 2 in all. Ninety-day follow-up was available for nine studies, overall including about 2200 patients. Incidence of 90-day TIA/stroke recurrence, symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation or intracranial bleeding and all cause mortality was 2.25%, 0.90% and 1.5%, respectively. The real life evidence suggests that early starting of DOACs in patients with NVAF-related AIS is safe and associated with low recurrence risk and all-cause mortality.

Timing of anticoagulation after recent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

About 13-26% of all acute ischaemic strokes are related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation, the most common cardiac arrhythmia globally. Deciding when to initiate oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation is a longstanding, common, and unresolved clinical challenge. Although the risk of early recurrent ischaemic stroke is high in this population, early oral anticoagulation is suspected to increase the risk of potentially harmful intracranial haemorrhage, including haemorrhagic transformation of the infarct. This assumption, and current treatment guidelines, are based on historical, mostly observational data from patients with ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with heparins, heparinoids, or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent recurrent ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials have subsequently shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; ie, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) are at least as effective as VKAs in primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation-related ischaemic stroke, with around half the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. However, none of these DOAC trials included patients who had experienced ischaemic stroke recently (within the first few weeks). Clinicians therefore remain uncertain regarding when to commence DOAC administration after acute ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Prospective observational studies and two small randomised trials have investigated the risks and benefits of early DOAC-administration initiation (most with a median delay of 3-5 days) in mild-to-moderate atrial fibrillation-associated ischaemic stroke. These studies reported that early DOAC treatment was associated with a low frequency of clinically symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or surrogate haemorrhagic lesions on MRI scans, whereas later DOAC-administration initiation (ie, >7 days or >14 days after index stroke) was associated with an increased frequency of recurrent ischaemic stroke. WHERE NEXT?: Adequately powered randomised controlled trials comparing early to later oral anticoagulation with DOACs in ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation are justified to confirm the acceptable safety and efficacy of this strategy. Four such randomised controlled trials (collectively planned to include around 9000 participants) are underway, either using single cutoff timepoints for early versus late DOAC-administration initiation, or selecting DOAC-administration timing according to the severity and imaging features of the ischaemic stroke. The results of these trials should help to establish the optimal timing to initiate DOAC administration after recent ischaemic stroke and whether the timing should differ according to stroke severity. Results of these trials are expected from 2021.

Longitudinal evaluation of serum periostin levels in patients after large-artery atherosclerotic stroke: A prospective observational study

Increasing evidence supports the involvement of periostin in the pathophysiological processes of stroke and atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to assess circulating periostin levels at different times after large-artery atherosclerotic (LAA) stroke and their association with stroke. Serum periostin levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on day 1 in 162 patients with LAA stroke and in 108 age- and sex-matched controls, on day 6 after stroke in 134 patients, and during the 4th week after stroke in 46 of the 162 patients. Stroke severity was determined using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the stroke volume was measured. Outcome at 3 months was measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Our results indicated that periostin levels increased significantly on day 6 after stroke, and this increasing trend persisted for at least 4 weeks after the event. In addition, the increase in periostin levels was positively correlated with the NIHSS scores and stroke volume, but not with the mRS scores after adjusting for the NIHSS scores. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the increase in serum periostin levels observed after stroke may be associated with the stroke severity in patients with LAA stroke.

Confidence in the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Acute Phase of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke Over the Years: A Real-World Single-Center Study

BACKGROUD AND AIM

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)-related acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is controversial. The aims of our study were to analyze physicians' confidence in prescribing DOACs in NVAF-related AIS, the characteristics of patients receiving DOACs, and their 90-day prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical records of consecutive patients admitted to our wards for NVAF-related AIS over the years 2014-2016 were reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven patients, 72.7% females, mean age ± standard deviation 83.4 ± 8.8 years, were admitted to our ward for atrial fibrillation (AF)-related AIS (38 in 2014, 47 in 2015, 62 in 2016). Of these patients, 141 had NVAF-related AIS. Median length of hospital stay was 8 days (interquartile range [IQR], 6-11). In-hospital mortality was 10.8%. Ninety-eight patients (69.5%) received DOACs for secondary prevention, with increasing percentages from 2014 (62.5%) to 2016 (88%). In 88% of them, DOACs were started during hospital stay, whereas in 12% DOACs were started during ambulatory follow-up. The median time for starting DOACs was 5 days (IQR, 3-8). In patients receiving DOACs, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 (IQR, 3-12), and large ischemic lesions were present in 48%; the median modified Rankin Scale score at hospital discharge was 3 (IQR, 1-4), whereas the score at 90 days was 2 (IQR, 1-3). At the 90-day follow-up, in patients receiving DOACs, overall mortality was 3.0%, stroke recurrence was 1%, and no patients had major intracranial or extracranial bleedings.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that physicians are becoming increasingly confident in the use of DOACs in NVAF-related AIS. The use of DOACs seems effective and safe even when started in the acute phase of stroke.