Psychometric Validation of a Japanese Version of the emPHasis-10 Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Pulmonary Hypertension - Multicenter Study in Japan

Understanding Patient Perspectives Toward Shared Decision-Making in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical guidelines for pulmonary hypertension (PH) recommend shared decision-making and individualized treatment. However, patient perspectives on PH treatment goals, preference toward a decision-making style of treatment, and adoption of shared decision-making remain unclear. This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study assessed the patients' preferred and actual participation role in treatment decision-making, rated on 5 scales (ranging from passive [patients leave all decisions to physicians] to active [patients make the decision after physicians show patients several options]) and evaluated the concordance between preferred and actual participation roles. The important factors underlying patients' perspectives in treatment decision-making (i.e., prognosis; symptom, financial, family, and social burdens; patient values; and physician recommendation) were evaluated. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the patients with a positive preference toward "physician recommendation" in treatment decision-making. Among 130 patients with PH (median age: 58 years; mean pulmonary arterial pressure: 23 mm Hg; 27.7% were males), 59.2% preferred that "physicians make the decision regarding treatment after showing patients therapeutic options (i.e., intermediate between passive and active roles)." The patient-preferred and actual participation roles in decision-making had moderate agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.46). The most important factor in treatment decisions was "symptom burden reduction" (93.8%). Although 85.0% of patients chose "physician recommendation" as an important factor, 49.6% chose "alignment with my values." The determinants of patients who chose "physician recommendation" were less severe hemodynamics and better functional capacity. In conclusion, patients with PH preferred that the "physicians make the decision after showing patients therapeutic options" and prioritized physician recommendation over their values.

EmPHasis-10 Health-Related Quality of Life and Exercise Capacity in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension After Balloon Angioplasty

Background

Whether pulmonary hemodynamic parameters and functional capacity are associated with quality of life in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate disease‐specific quality of life using the emPHasis‐10 questionnaire and assess its determinants in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension with normalized pulmonary hemodynamics.

Methods and Results

This cross‐sectional study included 187 health status assessments of 143 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (median age, 68 [58–75] years; men/women, 51/136; use of home oxygen therapy, 51 patients [27%]) after balloon pulmonary angioplasty with normalized mean pulmonary artery pressure <25 mm Hg at rest. Right heart catheterization was performed, followed by assessment of 6‐minute walk distance and the emPHasis‐10 questionnaire. The median pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were 18 (15–21) mm Hg and 2.2 (1.7–2.9) wood units, respectively. The median emPHasis‐10 score was 14 (8–24), whereas the median 6‐minute walk distance was 447 (385–517) m. Univariate linear regression analysis showed that the emPHasis‐10 score was associated with 6‐minute walk distance (β=−0.476 [95% CI −0.604, −0.348], P<0.001) and home oxygen therapy (β=0.214 [95% CI, 0.072, 0.356], P=0.003) but not with hemodynamic parameters. Multiple regression analysis revealed that a higher emPHasis‐10 score was associated with lower 6‐minute walk distance (β=−0.475 [95% CI, −0.631 to −0.319], P<0.001).

Conclusions

Health‐related quality of life was associated with exercise capacity and the use of home oxygen therapy, but not with hemodynamic parameters, in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and normalized hemodynamics after balloon pulmonary angioplasty. Improvements in exercise capacity may lead to further improvements in quality of life.

Dyspnoea-12 and Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile: Systematic Review of Use and Properties

CONTEXT

The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) and Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) were specifically developed for assessment of multiple sensations of breathlessness.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to identify the use and measurement properties of the D-12 and MDP across populations, settings and languages.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for primary studies (2008-2020) reporting use of the D-12 or MDP in adults. Two independent reviewers completed screening and data extraction. Study and participant characteristics, instrument use, reported scores and minimal clinical important differences (MCID) were evaluated. Data on internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) were pooled using random effects models between settings and languages.

RESULTS

A total 75 publications reported use of D-12 (n = 35), MDP (n = 37) or both (n = 3), reflecting 16 chronic conditions. Synthesis confirmed two factor structure, internal consistency (Cronbach's α mean, 95% CI: D-12 Total = 0.93, 0.91-0.94; MDP Immediate Perception [IP] = 0.88, 0.85-0.90; MDP Emotional Response [ER] = 0.86, 0.82-0.89) and 14 day test-rest reliability (ICC: D-12 Total = 0.91, 0.88-0.94; MDP IP = 0.85, 0.70-0.93; MDP ER = 0.84, 0.73-0.90) across settings and languages. MCID estimates for clinical interventions ranged between -3 and -6 points (D-12 Total) with small variability in scores over 2 weeks (D-12 Total 2.8 (95% CI: 2.0 to 3.7), MDP-A1 0.8 (0.6 to 1.1) and six months (D-12 Total 2.9 (2.0 to 3.7), MDP-A1 0.8 (0.6 to 1.1)).

CONCLUSION

D-12 and MDP are widely used, reliable, valid and responsive across various chronic conditions, settings and languages, and could be considered standard instruments for measuring dimensions of breathlessness in international trials.

How COVID-19 Affected the Introduction of Telemedicine and Patient Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension - A Report From a Referral Center in Japan

Background: COVID-19 is fatal to patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), so preventive actions are recommended. This study investigated the effectiveness of telemedicine and effects on quality of life (QOL) in the treatment of patients with PH. Methods and Results: Japanese patients with PH (n=40) were recruited from one referral center. Patient self-reported anxiety worsened significantly and elderly patients in particular experienced detrimental lifestyle changes under COVID-19. Telemedicine worked well to decrease the frequency of going out. Conclusions: Telemedicine is effective in reducing travel distances, and frequent remote interventions may be desirable for older, anxious patients.