Comparison of the anticonflict effect of buspirone and its major metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP) in rats

Animal models of anxiety disorders and stress

Anxiety and stress-related disorders are severe psychiatric conditions that affect performance in daily tasks and represent a high cost to public health. The initial observation of Charles Darwin that animals and human beings share similar characteristics in the expression of emotion raise the possibility of studying the mechanisms of psychiatric disorders in other mammals (mainly rodents). The development of animal models of anxiety and stress has helped to identify the pharmacological mechanisms and potential clinical effects of several drugs. Animal models of anxiety are based on conflict situations that can generate opposite motivational states induced by approach-avoidance situations. The present review revisited the main rodent models of anxiety and stress responses used worldwide. Here we defined as "ethological" the tests that assess unlearned/unpunished responses (such as the elevated plus maze, light-dark box, and open field), whereas models that involve learned/punished responses are referred to as "conditioned operant conflict tests" (such as the Vogel conflict test). We also discussed models that involve mainly classical conditioning tests (fear conditioning). Finally, we addressed the main protocols used to induce stress responses in rodents, including psychosocial (social defeat and neonatal isolation stress), physical (restraint stress), and chronic unpredictable stress.

Anxiolytic activity of tenoten and diazepam depends on conditions in Vogel conflict test

We compared two modifications of Vogel conflict test and assessed anxyolitic activity of two drugs: diazepam (benzodiazepine anxiolitic) and tenoten (ultra-low doses of antibodies to S-100 protein) in both modifications of the test. It was found that the intensity of anxiolitic effect of the drugs depends on the conditions of Vogel test.

Pharmacokinetics of 6-hydroxybuspirone and its enantiomers administered individually or following buspirone administration in humans

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of 6-hydroxybuspirone (6OHB) when given orally via three forms: racemate (BMS-528215), S-enantiomer (BMS-442606) and R-enantiomer (BMS-442608), versus following the administration of buspirone. A double-blind, randomized, four-period, four-treatment, crossover study balanced for residual effects in healthy subjects was conducted (n=20). Subjects received single 10 mg doses of each compound in a randomized fashion with pharmacokinetics determined over a 24 h period. There was a 4-day washout between each dosing period. All three forms of 6OHB (racemate, S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer) were well tolerated. There was nterconversion between enantiomers. The dominant enantiomer was the S-enantiomer no matter which form of 6OHB was administered. All three forms of 6OHB produced approximately 2- to 3-fold greater exposure to total 6OHB than did buspirone. All three forms produced equal exposure to 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP) which was approximately 30% less than the 1-PP exposure derived from buspirone administration. All three forms of 6OHB produced approximately 3-fold higher 6OHB:1-PP ratios and approximately 2.5-fold higher total 6OHB exposures than did buspirone administration. All compounds were well tolerated. There seemed to be no advantage of one of the enantiomers of 6OHB over the racemate. Therefore, the racemate was chosen for further clinical development.

A 5-HT1A agonist and a 5-HT2c antagonist reduce social interaction deficit induced by multiple ethanol withdrawals in rats

RATIONALE

Repeated withdrawals from chronic forced ethanol exposure sensitize animals to withdrawal-induced deficits in social interaction behavior. The deficits in social interaction behavior following withdrawal from continuous ethanol exposure can be reduced following acute treatments with 5-HT(2C) antagonists or 5-HT(1A) agonists.

OBJECTIVES

The present study investigated whether prior treatment with these serotonergic agents during early withdrawals in rats subjected to repeated withdrawals from ethanol exposure would ameliorate the social interaction deficits observed following the final withdrawal.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to three cycles of 5 days forced ethanol (7%, w/v), with 2 days of control diet after the first and second cycles. Drugs were administered IP 4 h after removal of ethanol on the first and second cycles but not the third in one group and 4.5 h after removal of ethanol on the third cycle in another. The social interaction test was performed 5 h after removal of ethanol on the third cycle. Drugs tested included SB-242084, a 5-HT(2C) antagonist; buspirone, a 5-HT(1A) partial agonist; WAY-100635, a 5-HT(1A) antagonist; ketanserin, a 5-HT(2A) antagonist; ritanserin, a mixed 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonist; and Ro-601075, a 5-HT(2C) agonist.

RESULTS

Both SB-242084 and buspirone reduced ethanol withdrawal-induced deficits in social interaction when given either acutely 30 min before the test or at 4 h after withdrawal from the first and second cycles. WAY-100635 and ketanserin were completely ineffective regardless of mode of treatment. In contrast, the 5-HT(2C) agonist, Ro-601075, accentuated the withdrawal-induced deficit in social interaction behavior in rats exposed to either 4.5 or 7% ethanol diet.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the utility of 5-HT(1A) agonists and 5-HT(2C) antagonists in reducing anxiety-like behavior induced by ethanol withdrawal and reducing the adaptive changes associated with repeated withdrawals.

The neurobiology and control of anxious states

Fear is an adaptive component of the acute "stress" response to potentially-dangerous (external and internal) stimuli which threaten to perturb homeostasis. However, when disproportional in intensity, chronic and/or irreversible, or not associated with any genuine risk, it may be symptomatic of a debilitating anxious state: for example, social phobia, panic attacks or generalized anxiety disorder. In view of the importance of guaranteeing an appropriate emotional response to aversive events, it is not surprising that a diversity of mechanisms are involved in the induction and inhibition of anxious states. Apart from conventional neurotransmitters, such as monoamines, gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, many other modulators have been implicated, including: adenosine, cannabinoids, numerous neuropeptides, hormones, neurotrophins, cytokines and several cellular mediators. Accordingly, though benzodiazepines (which reinforce transmission at GABA(A) receptors), serotonin (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonists and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors are currently the principle drugs employed in the management of anxiety disorders, there is considerable scope for the development of alternative therapies. In addition to cellular, anatomical and neurochemical strategies, behavioral models are indispensable for the characterization of anxious states and their modulation. Amongst diverse paradigms, conflict procedures--in which subjects experience opposing impulses of desire and fear--are of especial conceptual and therapeutic pertinence. For example, in the Vogel Conflict Test (VCT), the ability of drugs to release punishment-suppressed drinking behavior is evaluated. In reviewing the neurobiology of anxious states, the present article focuses in particular upon: the multifarious and complex roles of individual modulators, often as a function of the specific receptor type and neuronal substrate involved in their actions; novel targets for the management of anxiety disorders; the influence of neurotransmitters and other agents upon performance in the VCT; data acquired from complementary pharmacological and genetic strategies and, finally, several open questions likely to orientate future experimental- and clinical-research. In view of the recent proliferation of mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis, modulation and, potentially, treatment of anxiety disorders, this is an opportune moment to survey their functional and pathophysiological significance, and to assess their influence upon performance in the VCT and other models of potential anxiolytic properties.

The Vogel conflict test: procedural aspects, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and monoamines

A multitude of mechanisms are involved in the control of emotion and in the response to stress. These incorporate mediators/targets as diverse as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), excitatory amino acids, monoamines, hormones, neurotrophins and various neuropeptides. Behavioural models are indispensable for characterization of the neuronal substrates underlying their implication in the etiology of anxiety, and of their potential therapeutic pertinence to its management. Of considerable significance in this regard are conflict paradigms in which the influence of drugs upon conditioned (trained) behaviours is examined. For example, the Vogel conflict test, which was introduced some 30 years ago, measures the ability of drugs to release the drinking behaviour of water-deprived rats exposed to a mild aversive stimulus ("punishment"). This model, of which numerous procedural variants are discussed herein, has been widely used in the evaluation of potential anxiolytic agents. In particular, it has been exploited in the characterization of drugs interacting with GABAergic, glutamatergic and monoaminergic networks, the actions of which in the Vogel conflict test are summarized in this article. More recently, the effects of drugs acting at neuropeptide receptors have been examined with this model. It is concluded that the Vogel conflict test is of considerable utility for rapid exploration of the actions of anxiolytic (and anxiogenic) drugs. Indeed, in view of its clinical relevance, broader exploitation of the Vogel conflict test in the identification of novel classes of anxiolytic agents, and in the determination of their mechanisms of action, would prove instructive.

The novel buspirone analogue, 8-[4-[2-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolinyl)[butyl]-8-azaspiro [4.5 ]decane-7,9-dione, with anxiolytic-like and antidepressant-like effects in rats

In the conflict drinking test, used as a model to examine anxiolytic-like activity, the novel buspirone analogue 8-[4-[2-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolinyl)]butyl)-8-azaspiro[ 4.5]decane-7,9-dione (MM199) (0.62-2.5 mg/kg) and buspirone (0.62-5 mg/kg), significantly increased the punished drinking in water-deprived rats, without affecting water consumption or perception of the stimulus. The anticonflict activity of MM199 (1.25 mg/kg) was blocked by (S)-WAY 100135 (20 mg/kg), a 5-hydroxytrypatmine1A (5-HT1A) receptor antagonist. In the forced swimming test, used as a model to examine the antidepressant-like activity, MM199 (5-20 mg/kg) reduced the immobility time, while buspirone (5-20 mg/kg) had no such effect. The reduced immobility induced by MM199 (20 mg/kg) was antagonized by (S)-WAY100135 (10 mg/kg). The above findings suggest that MM199 possesses potent anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like properties which are mediated by activation of 5-HT1A receptors.

Comparative behavioural profiles of buspirone and its metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP) in the murine elevated plus-maze

It has been suggested that in vivo formation of the metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP) may be a major drawback in the use of buspirone as an anti-anxiety agent. To test this hypothesis, the effects of buspirone, alone or with proadifen (an inhibitor of liver microsomal enzymes) pretreatment, were contrasted with those of 1-PP in the murine elevated plus-maze test of anxiety. At 3.0 mg/kg (but not lower doses), buspirone per se had modest anxiolytic-like effects (increased percentage of open arm entries; reduced stretched-attend postures and flatback approach) that were associated with increased grooming and immobility. However, in proadifen-pretreated mice, buspirone produced behavioural depression only, with marked effects evident both at 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg. As proadifen blocks the biotransformation of buspirone to 1-PP, these data suggest that any anxiolytic activity of buspirone in the murine plus-maze may be attributable to its principal active metabolite. Consistent with this hypothesis, 1-PP (0.5-13.5 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent anti-anxiety effects on both conventional and ethological measures that were not confounded by motoric impairment. Results are discussed in relation to biochemical and electrophysiological studies suggesting that 1-PP has a direct action at 5-HT1A receptors.

5-Hydroxytryptamine pathways in anxiety and its treatment

The effects of manipulating 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) neuronal function in humans and in animals are reviewed. 5HT pathways do not have a unitary function in modulating anxiety. It is proposed that, rather than acting as input or output channels for brain aversive systems, these pathways provide information concerning waking/motor status, which is crucial to the organisation of appropriate responses to threat. Each terminal region can make use of this information in different ways. Globally, the influence of 5HT neurones on higher centres appears predominantly to facilitate information processing relevant to threat, while their major influence on brainstem centres may be a restraining one.

5-Hydroxytryptamine-interacting drugs in animal models of anxiety disorders: more than 30 years of research

An overview of the behavioral data arising from the vast literature concerning the involvement of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) neurotransmission in the regulation of anxiety is presented. More than 1300 experiments were carried out in this area and they provide evidence that: (1) results obtained in ethologically based animal models of anxiety with drugs stimulating 5-HT transmission are most consistent with the classic 5-HT hypothesis of anxiety in that they show an increase in animals' emotional reactivity; (2) no category of anti-anxiety models are selectively sensitive to the anxiolytic-like effects of drugs targetting 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptor subtypes; (3) anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, in the great part, are revealed by models based on spontaneous behaviors. Taken together, these observations lead to the conclusion that different 5-HT mechanisms, mediated by different receptor subtypes, are involved in the genesis of anxiety.

Effect of acute administration of the 5-HT1A receptor ligand, lesopitron, on rat cortical 5-HT and dopamine turnover

1. The involvement of presynaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) autoreceptors in the anxiolytic-like properties of lesopitron (E-4424) (2-(4-[4-(4-chloro-1-pyrazolyl)butyl]-1- piperazinyl)pyrimidine) was studied. Brain microdialysis was used to examine the effect of the drug on the release of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and its metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the frontal cortex of awake, freely moving rats. Moreover, extracellular cortical 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) were also studied to assess the possible participation of dopaminergic systems. 2. Lesopitron administered at a dose which induces anxiolytic behavior in rats (30 micrograms kg-1, i.p.) markedly reduced 5-HT levels (to 45% of the basal value) in cortical perfusates, having no effect on 5-HIAA, DOPAC and HVA. The effects of lesopitron were compared with those produced by the anxiolytic, and structurally related compound, buspirone. 3. Buspirone administered at a dose inducing anxiolytic-like effects in rats (5 mg kg-1, i.p.) produced a marked decrease in cortical 5-HT levels (to 20% of the basal value), but in contrast to lesopitron, buspirone produced a pronounced increase in cortical DOPAC (to 300% of the basal value) and HVA (to 400% of the basal value) levels. Buspirone administered at a low dose (30 micrograms kg-1, i.p.) was unable to affect cortical 5-HT levels. 4. To test the hypothesis that the 5-HT decreasing effect of lesopitron could be due to 5-HT1A autoreceptor (somatodendritic)-mediated inhibition of 5-HT neurotransmission, lesopitron was administered locally into the raphe nuclei. Intraraphe administration of 10 micro M lesopitron caused a decrease incortical 5-HT levels (the effect being of the same order as that obtained after systemic injection), with no effect on 5-HIAA, DOPAC and HVA. Raphe 5-HT extracellular levels were not modified afterintraraphe administration of lesopitron, indicating the absence of 5-HT reuptake blocking properties.5 We concluded that lesopitron, at an anxiolytic dose produced a marked inhibition of 5-HT release in the frontal cortex of awake, freely moving rats. This effect was observed after systemic administration as well as after intraraphe administration of the drug, suggesting an agonistic action at raphe 5-HTIA autoreceptors controlling 5-HT release in the projecting areas. In contrast to buspirone, lesopitrontreatment had no effect on cortical DOPAC or HVA levels.

Nitric oxide-mediated inhibitory response of rat proximal colon: independence from changes in membrane potential

1. We studied the relation of nitric oxide-mediated relaxation of smooth muscle to changes in membrane potential of cells in the proximal colon of rats. 2. The resting membrane potential and electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced junction potentials were recorded from the circular and longitudinal muscle cells. 3. Localized distension with a small balloon caused relaxation of the circular muscle on the anal side of the distended region (descending relaxation). Relaxation of the longitudinal muscle was also induced by EFS. 4. Inhibitory junction potentials (i.j.ps) were recorded from all circular muscle cells tested, but rarely from the longitudinal muscle cells. 5. The i.j.ps were recorded only in the presence of atropine but relaxations of both muscles were induced even in the absence of atropine. 6. Apamin (100 nM) completely abolished the i.j.ps recorded in both circular and longitudinal muscle cells, but had no significant effect on the relaxations of either. 7. In contrast to apamin, Ng nitro-L-arginine (10 microM) inhibited the relaxations of both muscles, but did not affect the i.j.ps. 8. Exogenously added nitric oxide (0.1-10 microM) induced relaxations of both muscles concentration-dependently, but did not affect the membrane potentials at these concentrations. 9. These data strongly suggest that nitric oxide-mediated relaxation of rat proximal colon is not associated with the i.j.ps of the cell membrane.

Effects of SUN 8399, a potent and selective 5-HT1A agonist, on conflict behavior and ambulatory activity in mice: comparison with those of buspirone, tandospirone and diazepam

Behavioral effects of p.o. administration of SUN 8399, a selective 5-HT1A agonist, on the operant behavior under a MULT VI 1.5 min/FR 5-punishment schedule of food reinforcement and on the ambulatory activity were evaluated in mice, and the characteristics were compared with those of other 5-HT1A agonists, buspirone and tandospirone, and the benzodiazepine diazepam. Diazepam (3 and 10 mg/kg) significantly increased the punished response without eliciting any significant change in the non-punished response; i.e., showing anticonflict action. SUN 8399 (3-30 mg/kg) and buspirone (1-10 mg/kg) did not significantly change either the punished or non-punished responses. Tandospirone significantly increased the non-punished response at 10 mg/kg, but significantly decreased both the punished and non-punished responses at 30 mg/kg. The single administration of SUN 8399 (10 mg/kg), buspirone (3 and 30 mg/kg) and tandospirone (10 and 30 mg/kg) significantly increased the ambulatory activity, while diazepam tended to decrease it. The ambulation-increasing effect of methamphetamine (2 mg/kg, s.c.) was reduced by buspirone (10 and 30 mg/kg) and tandospirone (10 and 30 mg/kg), but enhanced by diazepam (3 and 10 mg/kg). Buspirone (30 mg/kg), tandospirone (10 and 30 mg/kg) and diazepam (3 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced the ambulation-increasing effect of scopolamine (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.). SUN 8399 (3-100 mg/kg) did not modify the effects of either methamphetamine or scopolamine. The present results suggest that 5-HT1A agonists scarcely show anticonflict action on the Geller-type conflict behavior in mice. However, SUN 8399 possesses different behavioral characteristics from those of the other two 5-HT1A agonists in terms of interactions with methamphetamine and scopolamine.