Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Based on Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Characteristics

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms consist of heterogeneous diseases. Depending on the novel features detected by various modern technologies, their classification and related prognosis predictions continue to change and develop. The role of traditional clinicopathological prognostic factors, including classification systems, is also being refined, and several attempts have been made to predict a more accurate prognosis through novel serum biomarkers, genetic factors, and epigenetic factors that have been identified through various state-of-the-art molecular techniques with multiomics sequencing. In this review article, the latest research results including the traditional approach to prognostic factors and recent advanced strategies for risk stratification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms based on clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics are summarized. Predicting prognosis through multi-factorial assessments seems to be more efficacious, and prognostic factors through noninvasive methods are expected to develop further advances in liquid biopsy in the future.

Patterns and predictors of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor prognosis: Are no two leaves alike?

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are heterogeneous; thus, individual prognostic prediction is important. Clinicopathological features, like TNM stage, grade, and differentiation, are independent clinical predictors. However, single predictors are insufficient, as patients sharing similar clinicopathological features usually show distinct prognoses. Accordingly, novel nomograms and risk stratifications have been developed for more accurate PanNET prognostic prediction. Moreover, the exploration of molecular mechanisms has identified novel prognostic predictors for PanNET. Multi-analyte assays of molecular biomarkers provide a deeper understanding of PanNET features; however, the priority, and the optimal combination of classic and novel predictors for PanNET prognosis prediction remain unclear. In this review, we summarized the patterns and predictors of PanNET prognosis and discussed their clinical utility; we emphasized that PanNET at different stages have different superior predictor, and that multi-analyte assays are more sensitive than mono-analyte biomarkers. Therefore, combined biomarkers improve the accuracy of surveillance and optimize decision-making in clinical practice.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.

It Is Time to Rethink Biomarkers for Surveillance of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Tumor biomarkers (TBMs) reflect disease burden and correlate with survival for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs). This study sought to determine the performance of chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST), neurokinin A (NKA), and serotonin (5HT) during follow-up assessment of resected SBNETs.

METHODS

An institutional database identified patients undergoing surgery for SBNETs. Tumor biomarker levels were assessed as categorical (normal vs elevated) and continuous variables for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) via the Kaplan-Meier method with Cox multivariable models adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of TBM levels in identifying imaging-confirmed progression were calculated.

RESULTS

In 218 patients (44% female, 92% node + , 73% metastatic, 97% G1 or G2), higher levels of CgA, PST, NKA, and 5HT correlated with higher-grade and metastatic disease at presentation (p < 0.05). Elevated pre- and postoperative CgA, PST, and NKA correlated with lower PFS and OS (p < 0.05; median follow-up period, 49.6 months). Normal CgA, PST, and NKA were present in respectively 20.3%, 16.9%, and 72.6% of the patients with progression, whereas elevated levels were present in respectively 69.5%, 24.8%, and 1.3% of the patients without progression. Using TBMs to determine progression showed superiority of PST (78.9% accuracy) over CgA (63.3% accuracy) or CgA and PST together (60.3% accuracy).

CONCLUSION

Although specific for progression, NKA was rarely elevated, limiting its usefulness. Pre- and postoperative PST and CgA correlated with disease burden and survival, with PST providing better discrimination of outcomes. During the follow-up period, use of PST most accurately detected progression. These results suggest that PST should replace CgA for SBNET surveillance.

Plasma Pancreastatin Predicts the Outcome of Surgical Cytoreduction in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Small Bowel

OBJECTIVES

Elevated pancreastatin (PST) levels have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We hypothesized that plasma PST levels that remain elevated following surgical cytoreduction portend a poor prognosis in well-differentiated small bowel NETs.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with small bowel NETs who underwent surgical cytoreduction at our institution were identified. Demographics, histopathologic characteristics, and biochemical data were collected. Only patients who had serial preoperative PST (PreopPST) and postoperative PST (PostopPST) levels were included in this study. Patients were sorted into groups by PST level to assess their response to surgical cytoreduction (group 1, PreopPST/PostopPST normal; group 2, PreopPST elevated/PostopPST normal; group 3, PreopPST/PostopPST elevated). Survival rates were calculated from the date of surgery.

RESULTS

PreopPST and PostopPST levels were collected from 300 patients. Patients in groups 1 (n = 74) and 2 (n = 81) had a significant survival advantage compared with patients in group 3 (n = 145) (P < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier 5- and 10-year survival rates were as follows: group 1: 93% and 82%; group 2: 91% and 65%; and group 3: 58% and 34%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial monitoring of plasma PST is useful in predicting long-term survival following surgical cytoreduction and can be helpful to identify patients who have a poor prognosis.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors

There have been significant developments in diagnostic and therapeutic options for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Key phase 3 studies include the CLARINET trial, which evaluated lanreotide in patients with nonfunctioning enteropancreatic NETs; the RADIANT-2 and RADIANT-4 studies, which evaluated everolimus in functioning and nonfunctioning NETs of the gastrointestinal tract and lungs; the TELESTAR study, which evaluated telotristat ethyl in patients with refractory carcinoid syndrome; and the NETTER-1 trial, which evaluated Lu-DOTATATE in NETs of the small intestine and proximal colon (midgut). Based on these and other advances, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts with the goal of updating consensus-based guidelines for evaluation and treatment of midgut NETs. The medical aspects of these guidelines (focusing on systemic treatment, nonsurgical liver-directed therapy, and postoperative surveillance) are summarized in this article. Surgical guidelines are described in a companion article.

AACE/ACE disease state clinical review: diagnosis and management of midgut carcinoids

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a collection of complex tumors that arise from the diffuse endocrine system, primarily from the digestive tract. Carcinoid tumors most commonly originate from the small intestine. These tumors are either referred to as small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors or midgut carcinoids (MGCs). The purpose of this review article is to survey the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for patients with MGC and provide an overview of the complex multidisciplinary care involved in improving their quality of life, treatment outcomes, and survival.

METHODS

The current literature regarding the diagnosis and management of MGCs was reviewed.

RESULTS

Dry flushing and secretory diarrhea are the hallmarks of the clinical syndrome of MGC. Managing MGC requires attention to the overall symptom complex, including the physical effects of the tumor and biomarker levels. The somatostatin analogs (SAs) octreotide and lanreotide are highly efficacious for symptomatic improvement. MGCs require resection to encompass the primary tumor and mesenteric lymph node metastases and should include cholecystectomy if the patient is likely to receive SA therapy. Debulking of liver metastasis by resection in combination with ablative therapies and other liver-directed modalities may help palliate symptoms and hormonal overproduction in carefully selected patients. Quality of life is an important measure of patients' perception of the burden of their disease and impact of treatment modalities and may be a useful guide in deciding changes in therapy to alter apparent health status.

CONCLUSION

MGC is a challenging malignancy that requires the input of a multidisciplinary team to develop the best treatment plan. Consultation with expert centers that specialize in NETs may also be indicated for complex cases. With expert care, patients can be cured or live with the disease and enjoy good quality of life.

Elevated Serum Pancreastatin Is an Indicator of Hepatic Metastasis in Patients With Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVES

Serum pancreastatin is a sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarker in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Elevated pancreastatin levels are associated with worse progression-free survival and overall survival in small bowel and pancreatic NETs. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of elevated serum pancreastatin in identifying metastatic disease to the liver.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients with NET managed at a single institution was performed. The site of primary tumor, laboratory data, and presence of metastatic disease were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for pancreastatin as indicator of liver metastasis were ascertained.

RESULTS

Data were abstracted from 77 patient records. Small bowel was the primary tumor site in 44 patients (57%), and 49 patients had metastasis to the liver (64%). Sensitivity and specificity of serum pancreastatin was 85.7% and 66.7%, respectively, which compared with 61.5% and 43.8% for chromogranin A, in identifying liver metastasis in patients with primary tumors of the small bowel.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum pancreastatin is a sensitive and specific assay for detecting the incidence of liver metastasis in patients with small-bowel NET. Routine measurement of pancreastatin in patients with NET, especially in patients with small bowel primaries, is supported.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Challenges in an underestimated disease

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) are considered a relatively unusual oncologic entity. Due to its relative good prognosis, surgery remains the goal standard therapy not only in localized disease but also in the setting of locally or metastatic disease. Most of the patients are diagnosed in metastatic scenario, where multidisciplinary approach based on surgery, chemotherapies, liver-directed and/or molecular targeted therapies are commonly used. Owing to a deeper molecular knowledge of this disease, these targeted therapies are nowadays widely implemented, being the likely discovery of predictive biomarkers that would allow its use in other settings. This review is focused on describing the different classifications, etiology, prognostic biomarkers and multidisciplinary approaches that are typically used in PanNET.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are slow-growing neoplasms capable of storing and secreting different peptides and neuroamines. Some of these substances cause specific symptom complexes, whereas others are silent. They usually have episodic expression, and the diagnosis is often made at a late stage. Although considered rare, the incidence of NETs is increasing. For these reasons, a high index of suspicion is needed. In this article, the different clinical syndromes and the pathophysiology of each tumor as well as the new and emerging biochemical markers and imaging techniques that should be used to facilitate an early diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis are reviewed.

Circulating tumor markers in patients with neuroendocrine tumors – a clinical perspective

Abstract: 

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon malignancies with a very diverse presentation and prognosis. Patients with NETs frequently have circulating tumor biomarkers that may aid in the diagnosis and help with prognostication. The most commonly used and best studied marker is chromogranin A, which appears to reflect the tumor burden and is useful at the time of diagnosis, and to monitor for recurrence after resection as well as to assess response to systemic therapy. Despite being the best studied marker, chromogranin A has significant limitations. Multiple other biomarkers are in use, but most have not been studied well and need further validation before being recommended for clinical practice. We review both established and novel circulating biomarkers, and highlight some of the limitations of tumor marker use in patients with NETs.

Bone metastases in well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a single institutional review from the Ohio State University Medical Center

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we look at the clinical features associated with bone metastasis in patients with well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), specifically primary tumor characteristics, complications, elevated hormone levels, and survival.

METHODS

A retrospective study at the Ohio State University was performed on patients diagnosed with well-to-moderately differentiated NETs from 2000 to 2010 who were found to have bone metastases. A control group of patients with metastatic NETs without bone metastases was matched with regard to demographic and clinical data.

RESULTS

Of 341 patients with well-to-moderately differentiated NETs, 40 patients were found with bone metastases within the 10-year study period. Patients with bone metastases had shorter survival (median, 52 months) compared to the control group (median, 98 months; P = 0.024). Of 26 patients with bone metastases who died, 6 (23%) patients had a cause of death related to their bone metastatic disease. There were 8 patients with spinal cord compression, and 6 with pathologic fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that patients with well-to-moderately differentiated NETs metastatic to bone have larger tumors, more frequently elevated pancreastatin, and shorter survival than patients without bone metastases, with complications of bone metastases significantly contributing to mortality and morbidity.

Biochemical prognostic indicators for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) are rare tumors that are frequently diagnosed late in the course of the disease. Several biomarkers have been proposed in the literature as prognostic factors for patients with these tumors. This article discusses a recent publication in Annals of Surgical Oncology from the University of Iowa analyzing the effect of different biomarkers on survival in patients with PNETs and SBNETs.

A multianalyte PCR blood test outperforms single analyte ELISAs (chromogranin A, pancreastatin, neurokinin A) for neuroendocrine tumor detection

A critical requirement in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management is a sensitive, specific and reproducible blood biomarker test. We evaluated a PCR-based 51 transcript signature (NETest) and compared it to chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST) and neurokinin A (NKA). The multigene signature was evaluated in two groups: i) a validation set of 40 NETs and controls and ii) a prospectively collected group of NETs (n=41, 61% small intestinal, 50% metastatic, 44% currently treated and 41 age-sex matched controls). Samples were analyzed by a two-step PCR (51 marker genes) protocol and ELISAs for CgA, PST and NKA. Sensitivity comparisons included χ(2), non-parametric measurements, ROC curves and predictive feature importance (PFAI) analyses. NETest identified 38 of 41 NETs. Performance metrics were: sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 92.8%, positive predictive value 92.8% and negative predictive value 92.8%. Single analyte ELISA metrics were: CgA 76, 59, 65, and 71%; PST 63, 56, 59, and 61% and NKA 39, 93, 84, and 60%. The AUCs (ROC analysis) were: NETest: 0.96±0.025, CgA: 0.67±0.06, PST 0.56±0.06, NKA: 0.66±0.06. NETest significantly outperformed single analyte tests (area differences: 0.284-0.403, Z-statistic 4.85-5.9, P<0.0001). PFAI analysis determined NETest had most value (69%) in diagnosis (CgA (13%), PST (9%), and NKA (9%)). Test data were consistent with the validation set (NETest >95% sensitivity and specificity, AUC =0.98 vs single analytes: 59-67% sensitivity, AUCs: 0.58-0.63). The NETest is significantly more sensitive and efficient (>93%) than single analyte assays (CgA, PST or NKA) in NET diagnosis. Blood-based multigene analytic measurement will facilitate early detection of disease recurrence and can predict therapeutic efficacy.

Pancreastatin predicts survival in neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Serum neurokinin A, chromogranin A, serotonin, and pancreastatin reflect tumor burden in neuroendocrine tumors. We sought to determine whether their levels correlate with survival in surgically managed small bowel (SBNETs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

METHODS

Clinical data were collected with Institutional Review Board approval for patients undergoing surgery at one center. Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were from the time of surgery. Event times were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Preoperative and postoperative laboratory values were tested for correlation with outcomes. A multivariate Cox model adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

Included were 98 SBNETs and 78 PNETs. Median follow-up was 3.8 years; 62 % had metastatic disease. SBNETs had lower median PFS than PNETs (2.0 vs. 5.6 years; p < 0.01). Median OS was 10.5 years for PNETs and was not reached for SBNETs. Preoperative neurokinin A did not correlate with PFS or OS. Preoperative serotonin correlated with PFS but not OS. Higher levels of preoperative chromogranin A and pancreastatin showed significant correlation with worse PFS and OS (p < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment for confounders, preoperative and postoperative pancreastatin remained independently predictive of worse PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Whether pancreastatin normalized postoperatively further discriminated outcomes. Median PFS was 1.7 years in patients with elevated preoperative pancreastatin versus 6.5 years in patients with normal levels (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher pancreastatin levels are significantly associated with worse PFS and OS in SBNETs and PNETs. This effect is independent of age, primary tumor site, and presence of nodal or metastatic disease. Pancreastatin provides valuable prognostic information and identifies surgical patients at high risk of recurrence who could benefit most from novel therapies.

Serum pancreastatin: the next predictive neuroendocrine tumor marker

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pancreastatin is a derived peptide of chromogranin A (CgA). Pancreastatin has the potential to be a diagnostic and predictive tumor marker in detecting NETs.

METHODS

Radioimmunoassay tests of pancreastatin and CgA were performed on 103 patient specimens collected at Mount Sinai Medical Center between 1/2010 and 7/2012. Patient demographics, diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, pathologic findings, adjuvant treatments, and survival were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis utilized SPSS v20 software.

RESULTS

Mean pancreastatin levels were significantly higher in the 92 NETs patients than in the 11 non-NETs patients (227.261 vs. 59.727, P < 0.05). Twenty-seven of the 92 patients with elevated pancreastatin levels (mean = 240.67), had normal CgA levels (mean = 4.65). Pancreastatin had sensitivity and specificity of 64% (59/92), and 100% (11/11). CgA had lower sensitivity and specificity of 43% (40/92), and 64% (7/11). In all 27 instances the pancreastatin concentration was found to be sole indicator of NET disease. When controlling for the level of CgA for the entire sample, a statistically significant difference was not found in the mean pancreastatin levels between both patient groups (P = 0.139, R = 0.484).

CONCLUSION

Pancreastatin has greater sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing NETs than CgA. Further investigation of pancreastatin's diagnostic and predictive value is warranted.

Biochemical markers for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs)

Biochemical markers are applied in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) for diagnostic, prognostic or predictive purposes. Chromogranin A is the most important general marker and it is recommended to be measured in every patient with a suspected NET, whereas Neuron Specific Enolase is elevated mainly in poorly differentiated NETs. Pancreatic Polypeptide is used in the diagnosis of pancreatic non-functioning NETs, whereas Chorionic Gonadotrophin has an adjunctive role. In the case of functioning tumours, specific markers should be sought and monitored during follow up. Endogenous hyperinsulinemia is suggested in the presence of non-suppressible insulin and proinsulin levels during hypoglycemia, whereas high fasting or stimulated gastrin levels along with elevated gastric acid output are diagnostic for the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and somatostatin are markers for glucagonoma, VIP-oma and somatostatinoma syndromes respectively. In case of ectopic paraneoplastic syndrome, the relevant hormone serves as a diagnostic and prognostic marker.

Validation of neurokinin a assays in the United States and Europe

OBJECTIVES

International cooperative group trials require specific, sensitive biomarker assays that are validated between continents. Neurokinin A (NKA) has been shown to be a powerful independent predictor of a poor prognosis in well-differentiated midgut neuroendocrine tumors. We hypothesized that NKA concentrations of clinical specimens evaluated in NKA assays in the United States and the United Kingdom would be equivalent, even though assay techniques were significantly different.

METHODS

Frozen clinical specimen aliquots were shipped from the United States to the United Kingdom (n = 67), and from United Kingdom to the United States (n = 50). In addition, spiked plasma standards and medium-spiked standards were exchanged. Samples from the United States were directly assayed in a radioimmunoassay, whereas the UK specimens were extracted, and the reconstituted specimens assayed in the radioimmunoassay. Neurokinin A values from the 2 studies were analyzed by regression analysis.

RESULTS

The NKA values from the US and UK laboratories were essentially identical (United States to United Kingdom, r = 0.88, P < 0.0001; and United Kingdom to United States, r = 0.96, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Validation of biomarker assays across continents will ensure that laboratory observations made by researchers are equivalent and that prediction of clinical outcomes based on these assays is also reliable.

New and emerging syndromes due to neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms characterized by their ability to store and secrete different peptides and neuroamines. Some of these substances cause specific clinical syndromes whereas others are not associated with specific syndromes or symptom complexes. NETs usually have episodic expression that makes diagnosis difficult, erroneous, and often late. For these reasons a high index of suspicion is needed, and it is important to understand the pathophysiology of each tumor to decide which biochemical markers are more useful and when they should be used.

Circulating biomarkers in neuroendocrine tumors of the enteropancreatic tract: application to diagnosis, monitoring disease, and as prognostic indicators

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are difficult to diagnose. Their symptoms may be vague or intermittent, and are frequently associated with much more common diseases; many of the tumors may be asymptomatic. Therefore, diagnosis can be delayed for some years. Because most NETs are secretory, the measurement of circulating biomarkers is helpful not only for diagnosis but also for assessing tumor response to treatment, monitoring disease progression, and use as prognostic indicators.

The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome

The Endocrine Tumor Summit convened in December 2008 to address 6 statements prepared by panel members that reflect important questions in the treatment of acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome. Data pertinent to each of the statements were identified through review of pertinent literature by one of the 9-member panel, enabling a critical evaluation of the statements and the evidence supporting or refuting them. Three statements addressed the validity of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations as indicators or predictors of disease in acromegaly. Statements regarding the effects of preoperative somatostatin analog use on pituitary surgical outcomes, their effects on hormone and symptom control in carcinoid syndrome, and the efficacy of extended dosing intervals were reviewed. Panel opinions, based on the level of available scientific evidence, were polled. Finally, their views were compared with those of surveyed community-based endocrinologists and neurosurgeons.

Clinical significance of polymorphism and expression of chromogranin a and endothelin-1 in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the clinical significance of chromogranin A and endothelin-1 polymorphism and expression in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 2 CHGA polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in DNA samples of 435 patients with prostate cancer and 316 age matched male controls. Chromogranin A and endothelin-1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in prostate specimens of 114 men with prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and in 27 with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy and served as controls.

RESULTS

For the CHGA Glu264Asp polymorphism men with the GG genotype were at 2.05 times higher risk for prostate cancer than men with the CC genotype (p = 0.014). In men with prostate cancer higher chromogranin A immunohistochemistry grade was associated with higher stage and higher Gleason score (p = 0.011 and 0.044, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that chromogranin A immunohistochemistry grade was an independent variable for predicting biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (p = 0.023). Higher endothelin-1 expression was observed in prostate cancers (p = 0.011), especially those with a higher Gleason score (p = 0.042). There was no significant relationship between chromogranin A polymorphisms, and chromogranin A and endothelin-1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Polymorphism and expression of chromogranin A and endothelin-1 have clinical significance in prostate cancer. Chromogranin A expression was an independent predictor of biochemical failure after prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Development of a highly sensitive and specific carboxy-terminal human pancreastatin assay to monitor neuroendocrine tumor behavior

OBJECTIVE

Pancreastatin is a fragment of the chromogranin A (CgA) molecule. Existing pancreastatin assays, which depend on antibodies that cross-react in varying percents with the larger prohormone, may lack sensitivity and specificity to detect small changes in neuroendocrine tumor volume.

METHODS

We developed a highly specific, sensitive pancreastatin assay. The antibody used recognizes the carboxyl terminal of the peptide hormone and was raised against a 17-amino acid porcine pancreastatin fragment with high homology with the carboxy-terminal amino acids 286-301 of the human CgA.

RESULTS

Our assay measures more than 95% of circulating pancreastatin levels; has little or no cross-reactivity with CgA, even at plasma concentrations of 1000 ng/mL; and can detect pancreastatin levels of 17 pg/mL. Interassay reproducibility for the pancreastatin radioimmunoassay was determined from results of 3 quality control pools in 15 consecutive assays. Coefficients of variation for low, medium, and high pancreastatin levels were less than 20%. The sensitivity of serial pancreastatin assays to detect early liver tumor activity was demonstrated in 2 patients with slowly progressive neuroendocrine tumors and in patients undergoing surgical cytoreduction.

CONCLUSIONS

This highly specific, sensitive pancreastatin assay can detect small changes in liver tumor progression and is up to 100-fold more sensitive and specific than CgA assays in the United States.

Granin-derived peptides as diagnostic and prognostic markers for endocrine tumors

Chromogranin A-like immunoreactivity (CgA-LI) has been, and remains, the most widely used diagnostic and prognostic marker for endocrine tumors. The availability of assay kits combined with moderately high sensitivity and specificity has meant that there has been no great incentive to develop alternative markers. However, circulating concentrations of CgA-LI are elevated in several non-neoplastic diseases and in patients receiving acid-suppression therapy which may lead to false positive diagnosis. Additionally, certain endocrine tumors, such as rectal carcinoids, do not express the CgA gene so that there is a need for additional markers to complement CgA measurements. Plasma concentrations of the CgA-derived peptide, pancreastatin, measured with antisera of defined regional specificity, have a prognostic value in patients with metastatic midgut carcinoid tumors receiving somatostatin analog therapy or hepatic artery chemoembolization. Other CgA-derived peptides with potential as tumor markers are vasostatin-1, WE-14, catestatin, GE-25, and EL-35 but their value has yet to be fully assessed. Circulating concentrations of chromogranin B-like immunoreactivity (CgB-LI) are not elevated in non-neoplastic diseases and measurements of CCB, the COOH-terminal fragment of CgB, may be useful as a biochemical marker for neuroendocrine differentiation in lung tumors. Antisera to the secretogranin II-derived peptide, secretoneurin detects carcinoid tumors of the appendix with greater frequency than antisera to CgA and are of value in identifying therapy-resistant carcinoma of the prostate (clinical stage D3). Measurement of concentrations of a second secretogranin II-derived peptide, EM-66 in tumor tissue has been used to differentiate between benign and malignant pheochromocytoma. These examples point to a limited although potentially valuable role for granin-derived peptides as tumor markers.

Biochemical testing for neuroendocrine tumors

In this review, we focus on the use of biochemical markers for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors and exclusion of conditions that masquerade as neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, we outline the use of biochemical markers for follow-up, response to intervention, and determination of prognosis. Previous publications have focused only on markers specific to certain tumor types, but the uniqueness of this chapter is that it presents a new approach ranging from biochemical markers that relate to symptoms to the use of markers that facilitate decision making with regard to optimizing the choices of therapy from the complex arrays of intervention, The sequence of presentation in this chapter is first to provide the usual view, that is, biochemical markers of each tumor type and thereafter the diagnosis of the underlying condition or exclusion thereof and finally the algorithm for their use from the clinical presentation to the suspected diagnosis and the biochemical markers to monitor progression and therapeutic choice. There is also a specific description of the properties of the most important biochemical markers and 2 complications, bone metastasis and carcinoid heart disease, from the biochemical point of view.