1
|
Goff M, Jacobs S, Hammond J, Hindi A, Checkland K. Investigating the impact of primary care networks on continuity of care in English general practice: Analysis of interviews with patients and clinicians from a mixed methods study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14032. [PMID: 38556844 PMCID: PMC10982586 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In England, primary care networks (PCNs) offer opportunities to improve access to and sustainability of general practice through collaboration between groups of practices to provide care with a broader range of practitioner roles. However, there are concerns that these changes may undermine continuity of care. Our study investigates what the organisational shift to PCNs means for continuity of care. METHODS The paper uses thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews with general practitioners and other healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 33) in 19 practices in five PCNs, and their patients (n = 35). Three patient cohorts within each participating practice were recruited, based on anticipated higher or lower needs for continuity of care: patients over 65 years with polypharmacy, patients with anxiety or depression and 'working age' adults aged between 18 and 45 years. FINDINGS Patients and clinicians perceived changes to continuity in PCNs in our study. Larger-scale care provision in PCNs required better care coordination and information-sharing processes, aimed at improving care for 'vulnerable' patients in target groups. However, new working arrangements and ways of delivering care in PCNs undermine HCPs' ability to maintain continuity through ongoing relationships with patients. Patients experience this in terms of reduced availability of their preferred clinician, inefficiencies in care and unfamiliarity of new staff, roles and processes. CONCLUSIONS New practitioners need to be effectively integrated to support effective team-based care. However, for patients, especially those not deemed 'vulnerable', this may not be sufficient to counter the loss of relationship with their practice. Therefore, caution is required in relation to designating patients as in need of, or not in need of continuity. Rather, continuity for all patients could be maintained through a dynamic understanding of the need for it as fluctuating and situational and by supporting clinicians to provide follow-up care. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (PPI) A PPI group was recruited and consulted during the study for feedback on the study design, recruitment materials and interpretation of findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mhorag Goff
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Sally Jacobs
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | | | - Ali Hindi
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Kath Checkland
- Centre for Primary CareThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cohen E, Lindman I. Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective - a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:195-200. [PMID: 38189945 PMCID: PMC10851828 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2299119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patients' view on continuity of care (CoC), including preference for a certain general practitioner (GP) and importance and access to a regular general practitioner (RGP). DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Primary care center in Halland County, in the western part of Sweden. SUBJECTS Patients ≥18 years old and having at least one appointment at the primary care center during October-December 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Preference for a certain GP and importance of and accessibility for an RGP. RESULTS The study included 404 patients. Importance of having an RGP was considered by 86% of the patients. Preference for a certain GP was thought by 73% of the patients, and when asked as a bivariate question, 69% considered having an RGP. Both the importance of an RGP and preference for a certain GP were more often considered by patients ≥65 years (p < .0001). Regarding accessibility, 67% of the patients reported having access to their RGP 'always/most of the time or a lot of the time' and 62% reported seeing their RGP at last visit. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, this study showed that the majority of patients value CoC in terms of importance of having an RGP. Older patients were more likely to have a preference for a certain GP. Two-third of the patients succeeded in seeing their RGP always or a lot of the time. The results in this study provide evidence that CoC is important for most patients, regardless of age and gender.Key pointsPrevious studies have showed that continuity of care (CoC) is important regarding mortality and morbidity. In primary care, there is a current debate regarding CoC, accessibility and the strive for CoC. This study showed that the majority of patients, regardless of age and gender, value CoC and consider it being important. However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding age, where patients above 65 years old thought it was more important to have a regular general practitioner and more often had a preference for a certain GP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebba Cohen
- Säröledens Familjeläkare, Billdal, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wensing M, Roth C, Krug K. Measuring valued output in primary care: challenges and reconciliation. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:723-731. [PMID: 37306502 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2224566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Strong primary care has positive impact on patients' and population health, and high continuity of care is one of its hallmarks. Insight into the underlying mechanisms is limited and research on this topic requires measures of primary care outputs, which are states that mediate between processes and outcomes of primary care. AREAS COVERED Nine potential outputs of high continuity of care were specified to examine 45 validated patient questionnaires, which were identified in a systematic review. Eighteen questionnaires covered one or more primary care outputs, yet at variable and mostly limited extent. EXPERT OPINION Measures of primary care outputs can strengthen clinical and health services research, but such measures have yet to be developed and validated for most primary care outputs. The use of these measures in outcome evaluations of interventions in healthcare would enhance the interpretation of intervention effects. Validated measures are also needed to tap the full potential of advanced methods of data-analysis in clinical and health services research. Better understanding of the primary care outputs may also help to mitigate broader challenges in healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Wensing
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Catharina Roth
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Krug
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Continuity of Care and Coordination of Care: Can they Be Differentiated? Int J Integr Care 2023; 23:10. [PMID: 36819617 PMCID: PMC9936907 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Both care continuity and coordination are considered essential elements of health care system. However, little is known about the relationship between care continuity and coordination. This study aimed to differentiate the concepts of care continuity and coordination by developing and testing the reliability and validity of the Combined Outpatient Care Continuity and Coordination Assessment (COCCCA) questionnaire under the universal coverage health care system in Taiwan from a patient perspective. Methods Face-to-face interviews were conducted nationwide with community-dwelling older adults selected via stratified multistage systematic sampling with probability-proportional-to-size process. A total of 2,144 subjects completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 44.67%. Results The 16 items of the COCCCA questionnaire were identified via item analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). The PCA generated five dimensions: three continuity-oriented (interpersonal, information sharing and longitudinal between patients and physicians) and two coordination-oriented (information exchange and communication/cooperation among multiple physicians). The second-order confirmatory factor analysis supported the factor structure and indicated that distinct constructs of care continuity and coordination can be identified. Conclusion The COCCCA instrument can differentiate the concepts of care continuity and care coordination and has been demonstrated to be valid and reliable in outpatient care settings from a patient perspective.
Collapse
|
5
|
Liao J, Zhou M, Zhong C, Liang C, Hu N, Kuang L. Effect of Family Practice Contract Services on the Perceived Quality of Primary Care among Patients with Multimorbidity: A Cross-Sectional Study in Guangdong, China. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 19:157. [PMID: 35010417 PMCID: PMC8751177 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Family practice contract services, an important primary-care reform policy for improving primary healthcare quality in China, incorporate patients with multiple chronic conditions into the priority coverage groups and focus on their management. This study aims to explore the family practice contract services' effectiveness in improving the quality of primary care experienced by this population. A cross-sectional study using a three-stage sampling was conducted from January to March 2019 in Guangdong, China. A multivariable linear regression, including interaction terms, was applied to examine the associations between the contract services and primary care quality among people with different chronic conditions. The process quality of primary care was measured in six dimensions using the validated assessment survey of primary care (ASPC) scale. People with contract services scored higher in terms of quality of primary care than those without contract services. Contract services moderated the association between chronic condition status and primary care quality. Significantly positive interactions were observed in the patient-centred care dimension and negative interactions were reflected in the accessibility dimension. Our findings suggest that family practice contract services play a crucial role in improving patient-perceived primary care quality and provide emerging evidence that patients with multimorbidity tend to benefit more from the services, especially in patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyi Liao
- Department of Health Administration, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; (J.L.); (M.Z.)
| | - Mengping Zhou
- Department of Health Administration, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; (J.L.); (M.Z.)
| | - Chenwen Zhong
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China;
| | - Cuiying Liang
- Science Education Department, Dongguan People’s Hospital, Dongguan 523000, China;
| | - Nan Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, FIU Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Miami, FL 33199, USA
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Li Kuang
- Department of Health Administration, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; (J.L.); (M.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The cost-saving effect of continuity of care (COC): an analysis of institutional COC on diabetic treatment costs using panel 2SLS regressions. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1113. [PMID: 34663318 PMCID: PMC8522076 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07052-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high costs of chronic conditions call for new treatment approaches that reduce costs while ensuring desirable health outcomes. There has been a growing transformation of care delivery models from conventional referral systems to integrated care models. This study seeks to evaluate the cost-saving impact of integrated care delivery model under pay-for-performance (P4P) scheme with continuity of care at institution level (ICOC). METHODS We analyzed the Taiwan National Health Insurance claim data of 21,725 diabetic patients who visited clinics and/or hospitals at least four times a year for 8 years. Using average local provider P4P participation rate (for each accreditation level) as an instrumental variable in two-stage least squares (2SLS) regressions, we have estimated consistent estimates of the ICOC elasticities for all-cause inpatient and outpatient costs. RESULTS Our results show that ICOC significantly reduced inpatient costs but increased outpatient costs with the elasticity for treatment costs of -11.6 and 1.03, respectively. The decrease in inpatient costs offset the increase in outpatient costs and the resulting total cost saving showed significant association with ICOC. The saving effect of ICOC is especially robust among patients who used clinics as their principal source of care. CONCLUSIONS Institutional continuity of care has a substantial impact on the treatment costs of diabetes patients. In the context where inpatient care costs are significantly higher than that of the outpatient care, ICOC would lead to a meaningful cost-saving effect. For new diabetes patients, care by clinics demonstrated the strongest saving effect.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pu C, Tseng YC, Tang GJ, Lin YH, Lin CH, Wang IJ. Perception and Willingness to Maintain Continuity of Care by Parents of Children with Asthma in Taiwan. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18073600. [PMID: 33808479 PMCID: PMC8037309 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
To investigate caregivers’ attitudes toward continuity of care (COC) and their willingness to maintain continuity for their children with asthma under a national health insurance (NHI) system without strict referral management. We sampled 825 individuals from six pediatric outpatient departments in different parts of Taiwan from 2017 to 2018. We used a contingent valuation with a payment card method. Post-stratification weighting adjustment and coarsened exact matching were utilized. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare the willingness to pay and spend extra time maintaining continuity by parents. More than 80% of caregivers in the asthma group believed having a primary pediatrician was important for children’s health. Only 27.5% and 15.8% of caregivers in the asthma and control groups, respectively, believed changing pediatricians would negatively affect therapeutic outcomes. Regression analysis showed that the predicted willingness to pay for the asthma and non-asthma groups were NT$508 (SD = 196) and NT$402 (SD = 172), respectively, and there was a significant positive dose–response relationship between household income and willingness to pay for maintaining health care provider continuity. Caregivers’ free choices among health care providers may reduce willingness to spend extra effort to maintain high COC. Caregivers should be educated on the importance of COC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christy Pu
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Chen Tseng
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan; (Y.-C.T.); (G.-J.T.)
| | - Gau-Jun Tang
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan; (Y.-C.T.); (G.-J.T.)
| | - Yen-Hsiung Lin
- Hengchun Tourism Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Hengchun 946, Taiwan;
| | - Chien-Heng Lin
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Children’s Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan;
| | - I-Jen Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei 242033, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
- College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350401, Taiwan
- National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-2-2276-5566 (ext. 2532)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chau E, Rosella LC, Mondor L, Wodchis WP. Association between continuity of care and subsequent diagnosis of multimorbidity in Ontario, Canada from 2001-2015: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245193. [PMID: 33705429 PMCID: PMC7951913 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuity of care is a well-recognized principle of the primary care discipline owing to its medical, interpersonal, and cost-saving benefits. Relationship continuity or the ongoing therapeutic relationship between a patient and their physician is a particularly desirable goal, but its role in preventing the accumulation of chronic conditions diagnoses in individuals is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of continuity of care with physicians on the rate of incident multimorbidity diagnoses in patients with existing conditions. METHODS This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study from 2001 to 2015 that focused on patients aged 18 to 105 years with at least one chronic condition (n = 166,665). Our primary exposure was relationship continuity of care with general practitioners and specialists measured using the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index (COCI). COCI was specified as a time-dependent exposure prior to the observation period. Our outcomes of interest were the time to diagnosis of a second, third, and fourth chronic condition estimated using cause-specific hazard regressions accounting for death as a competing risk. FINDINGS We observed that patients with a single chronic condition and high continuity of care (>0.50) were diagnosed with a second chronic condition or multimorbidity at an 8% lower rate compared to individuals with low continuity (cause-specific hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (95% Confidence Interval 0.90-0.93; p<0.0001) after adjusting for age, sex, income, place of residence, primary care enrolment, and the annual number of physician visits. Continuity remained protective as the degree of multimorbidity increased. Among patients with two conditions, the risk of diagnosis of a third chronic condition was also 8% lower for individuals with high continuity (HR 0.92; CI 0.90-0.94; p<0.0001). Patients with three conditions and high continuity had a 9% lower risk of diagnosis with a fourth condition (HR 0.91; CI 0.89-0.93; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Continuity of care is a potentially modifiable health system factor that reduces the rate at which diagnoses of chronic conditions are made over time in patients with multimorbidity. Additional research is needed to explain the underlying mechanisms through which continuity is related to a protective effect and the clinical sequalae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Chau
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura C. Rosella
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Walter P. Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Valaker I, Fridlund B, Wentzel-Larsen T, Nordrehaug JE, Rotevatn S, Råholm MB, Norekvål TM. Continuity of care and its associations with self-reported health, clinical characteristics and follow-up services after percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:71. [PMID: 32005235 PMCID: PMC6993348 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4908-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Complexity of care in patients with coronary artery disease is increasing, due to ageing, improved treatment, and more specialised care. Patients receive care from various healthcare providers in many settings. Still, few studies have evaluated continuity of care across primary and secondary care levels for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to determine multifaceted aspects of continuity of care and associations with socio-demographic characteristics, self-reported health, clinical characteristics and follow-up services for patients after PCI. METHODS This multi-centre prospective cohort study collected data at baseline and two-month follow-up from medical records, national registries and patient self-reports. Univariable and hierarchical regressions were performed using the Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire total score as the dependent variable. RESULTS In total, 1695 patients were included at baseline, and 1318 (78%) completed the two-month follow-up. Patients stated not being adequately informed about lifestyle changes, medication and follow-up care. Those experiencing poorer health status after PCI scored significantly worse on continuity of care. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scored significantly better on informational and management continuity than those with other cardiac diagnoses. The regression analyses showed significantly better continuity (P ≤ 0.034) in patients who were male, received written information from hospital, were transferred to another hospital before discharge, received follow-up from their general practitioner or had sufficient consultation time after discharge from hospital. CONCLUSION Risk factors for sub-optimal continuity were identified. These factors are important to patients, healthcare providers and policy makers. Action should be taken to educate patients, reconcile discharge plans and organise post-discharge services. Designing pathways with an interdisciplinary approach and shared responsibility between healthcare settings is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Valaker
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Svanehaugvegen 1, 6812 Førde, Norway
| | - Bengt Fridlund
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Box 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Interprofessional Collaboration within Emergency care (CICE), Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden
| | - Tore Wentzel-Larsen
- Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsveien 28, 5009 Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Gullhaugveien 1-3, 0484 Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Gullhaugveien 1, 0484 Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Erik Nordrehaug
- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, P.O box 7804, 5020 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Gerd-Ragna Bloch Thorsens gate 8, 4011 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Svein Rotevatn
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Box 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway
- Norwegian Registry for Invasive Cardiology, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Maj-Britt Råholm
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Svanehaugvegen 1, 6812 Førde, Norway
| | - Tone M. Norekvål
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Svanehaugvegen 1, 6812 Førde, Norway
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Box 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, P.O box 7804, 5020 Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shrivastava R, Couturier Y, Simard-Lebel S, Girard F, Aguirre NVB, Torrie J, Emami E. Relational continuity of oral health care in Indigenous communities: a qualitative study. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19:287. [PMID: 31865901 PMCID: PMC6927186 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0986-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The relational continuity of care is an essential function of primary health care. This study reports on the perspectives of Cree communities and their primary health care providers regarding the barriers and enablers of relational continuity of oral health care integrated at a primary health care organization. Methods A multiple case study design within a qualitative approach and developmental evaluation methodology were used to conduct this research study in Cree communities of Northern Québec. Maximum variation sampling and snowball techniques were used to recruit the participants. Data collection consisted of individual interviews and focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was conducted which included transcription, debriefing, codification, data display, and interpretation. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) were used to guide the reporting of study findings. Results A total of six focus group discussions and 36 individual interviews were conducted. Five major themes emerged from the thematic analyses for barriers (two) and enablers (three). Themes for barriers included impermanence and lack of effective communication, whereas themes for enablers included culturally competent professionals, working across professional boundaries, and proactive organizational engagement. Conclusions Based on these findings, relational continuity can be empowered by effective strategies for overcoming barriers and encouraging enablers, such as recruitment of permanent professionals, organizing cultural competency training, development of a Cree language dental glossary, encouraging inter-professional collaboration, and promoting the organization’s efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Shrivastava
- Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Yves Couturier
- School of Social Work, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, J1H 4C4, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Felix Girard
- Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | | | - Jill Torrie
- Director of Specialised Services, Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay, Mistissini, Québec, G0W 1C0, Canada
| | - Elham Emami
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1G1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Millar E, Stanley J, Gurney J, Stairmand J, Davies C, Semper K, Dowell A, Lawrenson R, Mangin D, Sarfati D. Effect of multimorbidity on health service utilisation and health care experiences. J Prim Health Care 2019; 10:44-53. [PMID: 30068451 DOI: 10.1071/hc17074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multimorbidity, the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions, is associated with poor quality of life, high health care costs and contributes to ethnic health inequality in New Zealand (NZ). Health care delivery remains largely focused on management of single diseases, creating major challenges for patients and clinicians. AIM To understand the experiences of people with multimorbidity in the NZ health care system. METHODS A questionnaire was sent to 758 people with multimorbidity from two primary health care organisations (PHOs). Outcomes were compared to general population estimates from the NZ Health Survey. RESULTS Participants (n = 234, 31% response rate) reported that their general practitioners (GPs) respected their opinions, involved them in decision-making and knew their medical history well. The main barriers to effective care were short GP appointments, availability and affordability of primary and secondary health care, and poor communication between clinicians. Access issues were higher than for the general population. DISCUSSION Participants generally had very positive opinions of primary care and their GP, but encountered structural issues with the health system that created barriers to effective care. These results support the value of ongoing changes to primary care models, with a focus on patient-centred care to address access and care coordination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor Millar
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - James Stanley
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jason Gurney
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jeannine Stairmand
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Kelly Semper
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Anthony Dowell
- Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stumm J, Thierbach C, Peter L, Schnitzer S, Dini L, Heintze C, Döpfmer S. Coordination of care for multimorbid patients from the perspective of general practitioners - a qualitative study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:160. [PMID: 31747886 PMCID: PMC6865037 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1048-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Germany, a decreasing number of general practitioners (GPs) face a growing number of patients with multimorbidity. Whilst care for patients with multimorbidity involves various healthcare providers, the coordination of this care is one of the many responsibilities of GPs. The aims of this study are to identify the barriers to the successful coordination of multimorbid patient care and these patients' complex needs, and to explore the support needed by GPs in the care of multimorbid patients. Interviewees were asked for their opinion on concepts which involve the support by additional employees within the practice or, alternatively, external health care professionals, providing patient navigation. METHODS Thirty-two semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 GPs and 16 medical practice assistants (MPAs) from 16 different practices in Berlin. A MPA is a qualified non-physician practice employee. He or she undergoes a three years vocational training which qualifies him or her to provide administrative and clinical support. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using the framework analysis methodology. RESULTS The results of this paper predominantly focus on GPs' perspectives of coordination within and external to general practice. Coordination in the context of care for multimorbid patients consists of a wide range of different tasks. Organisational and administrative obstacles under the regulatory framework of the German healthcare system, and insufficient communication with other healthcare providers constitute barriers described by the interviewed GPs and MPAs. In order to ensure optimal care for patients with multimorbidity, GPs may have to delegate responsibilities associated with coordinating tasks. GPs consider the deployment of an additional specifically qualified employee inside the general practice to take on coordinative and social and legal duties to be a viable option. CONCLUSIONS The cross-sectoral cooperation between all involved key players working within the healthcare system, as well as the coordination of the whole care process, is seemingly challenging for GPs within the complex care system of multimorbid patients. GPs are generally open to the assignment of a person to support them in coordination tasks, preferably situated within the practice team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Stumm
- Institute of General Practice, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Thierbach
- Institute of General Practice, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lisa Peter
- Institute of General Practice, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Schnitzer
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lorena Dini
- Institute of General Practice, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Heintze
- Institute of General Practice, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Döpfmer
- Institute of General Practice, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tseng YC, Wang IJ, Pu C. Parents' perception and willingness to maintain provider care continuity for their children under universal health coverage. AIMS Public Health 2019; 6:121-134. [PMID: 31297398 PMCID: PMC6606528 DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.2.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Provider continuity of care (COC) is closely related to patient outcome in pediatrics. However, no study has investigated how parents perceive the importance of COC and whether their perceptions affect their willingness to make effort to maintain good provider COC for their children under universal health coverage. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted between August 2017 and February 2018 across 6 different practices: 2 medical centers, 2 regional hospitals, 1 district hospital, and 1 clinic (n = 825). Parents' and caregivers' perceptions and perceived value of COC were evaluated using 7 items. The contingent valuation method was used to estimate willingness to pay and spend time. Results Of all respondents, only 47% (n = 394) were willing to spend >30 minutes to have their children see the regular physician if the regular physician relocated. Approximately 38% (n = 302) respondents were willing to pay more than New Taiwan Dollar (NT$) 300 per month to maintain provider COC. The perception that high COC is important was associated with willingness to spend more time for maintaining high provider COC. Conclusion Parents' perception of COC does not affect their willingness to pay for maintaining high provider COC for their children but affects their willingness to spend more time to maintain COC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Chen Tseng
- Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - I Jen Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.,College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.,College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
| | - Christy Pu
- Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Multimorbidity and Health Care Service Utilization in the Australian Workforce: Findings From the National Health Survey. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 59:795-802. [PMID: 28692013 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to understand the patterns of health care service utilization in employees with multimorbidity. METHODS Data were obtained from the 2011 to 2012 cross-sectional Australian National Health Survey. Past-month health care service utilization was collected for each chronic condition from a pre-specified list. Descriptive, logistic, and Poisson regression analyses were used. The data were weighted to produce nationally representative estimates. RESULTS Multimorbid employees with arthritis had higher adjusted arthritis-specific general practitioner (GP) visit rates [rate ratio (RR) = 1.7, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.1 to 2.2, P < 0.001] than employees with arthritis alone. Similarly, multimorbid employees with cardiovascular disease (CVD) had higher adjusted CVD-specific specialist visit rates (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1 to 2.5, P < 0.05) and 2.5 times (95% CI = 1.5 to 4.0, P < 0.001) more CVD-specific other health professional visits than employees with CVD alone. CONCLUSIONS Given the increasing number of employees managing work and chronic illnesses, these findings have implications for health services and employers.
Collapse
|
15
|
Waibel S, Vargas I, Coderch J, Vázquez ML. Relational continuity with primary and secondary care doctors: a qualitative study of perceptions of users of the Catalan national health system. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:257. [PMID: 29631622 PMCID: PMC5891958 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3042-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the current context of increasingly fragmented healthcare systems where patients are seen by multiple doctors in different settings, patients’ relational continuity with one doctor is regaining relevance; however little is known about relational continuity with specialists. The aim of this study is to explore perceptions of relational continuity with primary care and secondary care doctors, its influencing factors and consequences from the viewpoint of users of the Catalan national health system (Spain). Methods We conducted a descriptive-interpretative qualitative study using a two-stage theoretical sample; (i) contexts: three healthcare areas in the Catalan national health system with differing characteristics; (ii) informants: users 18 years or older attended to at both care levels. Sample size (n = 49) was reached by saturation. Data were collected by individual semi-structured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was carried out segmenting data by study area, and leaving room for new categories to emerge from the data. Results Patients across the areas studied generally experienced consistency of primary care doctors (PCD), alongside some inconsistency of specialists. Consistency of specialists did not seem to be relevant to some patients when their clinical information was shared and used. Patients who experienced consistency and frequent visits with the same PCD or specialist described and valued having established an ongoing relationship characterised by personal trust and mutual accumulated knowledge. Identified consequences were diverse and included, for example, facilitated diagnosis or improved patient-doctor communication. The ascription to a PCD, a health system-related factor, facilitated relational continuity with the PCD, whereas organizational factors (for instance, the size of the primary care centre) favoured consistency of PCD and specialists. Doctor-related factors (for example, high technical competence or commitment to patient care) particulary fostered the development of an ongoing relationship. Conclusions Consistency of doctors differs depending on the care level as does the relevance attributed to it. Most influencing factors can be applied to both care levels and might be addressed by healthcare managers to foster relational continuity. More research is needed to fully understand the relevance patients assign to relational continuity with specialists. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3042-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Waibel
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Av. Tibidabo 21, 08022, Barcelona, Spain. .,Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Av. de Can Domènech 737, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola de Vallès), Spain.
| | - Ingrid Vargas
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Av. Tibidabo 21, 08022, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Coderch
- Grup de Recerca en Serveis Sanitaris i Resultats en Salut, Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Carrer Hospital 17-19 Edifici Fleming, 17230, Palamós, Spain
| | - María-Luisa Vázquez
- Grup de Recerca en Serveis Sanitaris i Resultats en Salut, Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Carrer Hospital 17-19 Edifici Fleming, 17230, Palamós, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rondeau-Boulanger É, Drolet MJ. Continuité et discontinuité dans les trajectoires de soins de personnes ayant une problématique complexe de santé : perceptions d’ergothérapeutes – une étude exploratoire. BIOÉTHIQUEONLINE 2018. [DOI: 10.7202/1044266ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Depuis la mise sur pied d’un système de santé financé par des fonds publics et dirigé par un ministère de la santé, le réseau de la santé du Québec a connu plusieurs changements. Par exemple, des changements ont été réalisés au début des années 2000, visant en outre à améliorer l’accessibilité et la continuité des soins de santé disponibles à la population québécoise. En dépit du souci du Ministère d’améliorer la continuité des soins, des problèmes persistent pour les personnes présentant une problématique complexe de santé. En effet, les individus aux prises avec une comorbidité, c’est-à-dire avec un problème de santé physique et une autre de santé mentale, sont plus susceptibles de vivre des discontinuités dans leurs trajectoires de soins de santé (autrement dit une discontinuité dans leur accès aux soins), constituant une réponse peu adéquate à leurs besoins. Pour comprendre ce que vivent des ergothérapeutes qui desservent de tels clients, une étude exploratoire a été réalisée. Le but de cette recherche était d’explorer les perceptions d’ergothérapeutes à propos de la continuité et de la discontinuité dans les trajectoires de soins de ces clients. Les ergothérapeutes identifient des raisons qui, à leur avis, expliquent les discontinuités dans les trajectoires de soins des individus présentant une problématique complexe de santé, nomment plusieurs conséquences négatives de ces discontinuités et mentionnent des façons pouvant contribuer à améliorer la continuité des soins prodigués à ces personnes. La prise en compte des perceptions des ergothérapeutes s’avère pertinente afin d’améliorer les soins offerts à ces personnes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Édith Rondeau-Boulanger
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec (CIUSSS-MCQ), Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Marie-Josée Drolet
- Département d’ergothérapie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Trois-Rivières, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lloyd H, Wheat H, Horrell J, Sugavanam T, Fosh B, Valderas JM, Close J. Patient-Reported Measures for Person-Centered Coordinated Care: A Comparative Domain Map and Web-Based Compendium for Supporting Policy Development and Implementation. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e54. [PMID: 29444767 PMCID: PMC5830608 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported measure (PRM) questionnaires were originally used in research to measure outcomes of intervention studies. They have now evolved into a diverse family of tools measuring a range of constructs including quality of life and experiences of care. Current health and social care policy increasingly advocates their use for embedding the patient voice into service redesign through new models of care such as person-centered coordinated care (P3C). If chosen carefully and used efficiently, these tools can help improve care delivery through a variety of novel ways, including system-level feedback for health care management and commissioning. Support and guidance on how to use these tools would be critical to achieve these goals. Objective The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based guidance and support for the use of P3C-PRMs in health and social care policy through identification of PRMs that can be used to enhance the development of P3C, mapping P3C-PRMs against an existing model of domains of P3C, and integration and organization of the information in a user-friendly Web-based database. Methods A pragmatic approach was used for the systematic identification of candidate P3C-PRMs, which aimed at balancing comprehensiveness and feasibility. This utilized a number of resources, including existing compendiums, peer-reviewed and gray literature (using a flexible search strategy), and stakeholder engagement (which included guidance for relevant clinical areas). A subset of those candidate measures (meeting prespecified eligibility criteria) was then mapped against a theoretical model of P3C, facilitating classification of the construct being measured and the subsequent generation of shortlists for generic P3C measures, specific aspects of P3C (eg, communication or decision making), and condition-specific measures (eg, diabetes, cancer) in priority areas, as highlighted by stakeholders. Results In total, 328 P3C-PRMs were identified, which were used to populate a freely available Web-based database. Of these, 63 P3C-PRMs met the eligibility criteria for shortlisting and were classified according to their measurement constructs and mapped against the theoretical P3C model. We identified tools with the best coverage of P3C, thereby providing evidence of their content validity as outcome measures for new models of care. Transitions and medications were 2 areas currently poorly covered by existing measures. All the information is currently available at a user-friendly web-based portal (p3c.org.uk), which includes all relevant information on each measure, such as the constructs targeted and links to relevant literature, in addition to shortlists according to relevant constructs. Conclusions A detailed compendium of P3C-PRMs has been developed using a pragmatic systematic approach supported by stakeholder engagement. Our user-friendly suite of tools is designed to act as a portal to the world of PRMs for P3C, and have utility for a broad audience, including (but not limited to) health care commissioners, managers, and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Lloyd
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Wheat
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Horrell
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Fosh
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - James Close
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vargas I, Garcia-Subirats I, Mogollón-Pérez AS, De Paepe P, da Silva MRF, Unger JP, Aller MB, Vázquez ML. Patient perceptions of continuity of health care and associated factors. Cross-sectional study in municipalities of central Colombia and north-eastern Brazil. Health Policy Plan 2017; 32:549-562. [PMID: 28104694 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the fragmentation of healthcare provision being considered one of the main obstacles to attaining effective health care in Latin America, very little is known about patients' perceptions. This paper analyses the level of continuity of health care perceived by users and explores influencing factors in two municipalities of Colombia and Brazil, by means of a cross-sectional study based on a survey of a multistage probability sample of people who had suffered at least one health problem within the previous three months (2163 in Colombia; 2167 in Brazil). An adapted and validated version of the CCAENA© (Questionnaire of care continuity across levels of health care) was applied. Logistic regression models were generated to assess the relationship between perceptions of the different types of health care continuity and sociodemographic characteristics, health needs, and organizational factors. The results show lower levels of continuity across care levels in information transfer and care coherence and higher levels for the ongoing patient-doctor relationship, albeit with differences between the two countries. They also show greater consistency of doctors in the Brazilian study areas, especially in primary care. Consistency of doctors was not only positively associated with the patient-doctor ongoing relationship in the study areas of both countries, but also with information transfer and care coherence across care levels. The study area and health needs (the latter negatively for patients with poor self-rated health and positively for those with at least one chronic condition) were associated with all types of continuity of care. The influence of the sex or income varied depending on the country. The influence of the insurance scheme in the Colombian sample was not statistically significant. Both countries should implement policies to improve coordination between care levels, especially regarding information transfer and job stability for primary care doctors, both key factors to guarantee quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Vargas
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Avenida Tibidabo, 21, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Garcia-Subirats
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Avenida Tibidabo, 21, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amparo Susana Mogollón-Pérez
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24, Número 63C-69, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Pierre De Paepe
- The Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 15, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Jean-Pierre Unger
- The Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 15, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - M B Aller
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Avenida Tibidabo, 21, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Luisa Vázquez
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Avenida Tibidabo, 21, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Perceived value of eHealth among people living with multimorbidity: a qualitative study. JOURNAL OF COMORBIDITY 2017; 7:96-111. [PMID: 29359124 PMCID: PMC5777537 DOI: 10.15256/joc.2017.7.98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background The prevalence of multimorbidity is increasing, creating challenges for patients, healthcare professionals, and healthcare systems. Given that chronic disease management increasingly involves eHealth, it is useful to assess its perceived value among people with multimorbidity. Objective To explore challenges related to multimorbidity and patients’ perspectives on eHealth. Design Ten semi-structured interviews with adults, living with multimorbidity in Copenhagen, Denmark. Interviews focused on patient-experienced challenges, from challenges related to self-management to challenges experienced in the healthcare sector, as well as perceptions of eHealth. During interviews, participants were presented with pictures of different eHealth technologies. Data analysis followed the systematic text condensation approach. Results Participants experienced challenges in their daily lives, e.g. when practicing self-management activities, when navigating the healthcare sector, and when interacting with healthcare professionals. Patient-perceived value of eHealth varied, depending on their burden of illness and treatment: those with a greater burden had more positive perceptions of eHealth, and expressed more intention to use it. Participants with less complex disease patterns and less burdensome treatment regimens were more likely to perceive eHealth as something worthless and undesirable. Participants stressed that eHealth should only be introduced as an optional supplement. Conclusions eHealth can potentially address some patient-experienced challenges related to multimorbidity by promoting self-management, patient-centeredness, and access. However, patients’ needs and preferences vary and eHealth cannot substitute the personal interaction between patient and healthcare professionals. Our findings point to the importance of patient assessment and stratification to ensure appropriate use of eHealth.
Collapse
|
20
|
Aleluia IRS, Medina MG, Almeida PFD, Vilasbôas ALQ. Coordenação do cuidado na atenção primária à saúde: estudo avaliativo em município sede de macrorregião do nordeste brasileiro. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2017; 22:1845-1856. [DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232017226.02042017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo Estudos internacionais e nacionais têm destacado a importância da coordenação do cuidado para a organização de sistemas locais de saúde. Este estudo avaliou a coordenação do cuidado pela Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS) em um sistema local de saúde do Estado da Bahia. Trata-se de um estudo de caso em município sede de macrorregião, com dois níveis de análise: equipe e gestão municipal. Adotou-se condições traçadoras (hipertensão arterial e diabetes mellitus) e elaborou-se uma imagem-objetivo correspondente à coordenação do cuidado, a partir da revisão atualizada da literatura nacional e internacional. Foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas com profissionais, gestores da APS e utilizadas outras fontes documentais. Evidenciou-se que a coordenação do cuidado não tem sido alcançada no município, onde apenas 14 dos 22 critérios propostos foram atendidos, destacando-se como principais dificuldades a ausência de protocolos assistenciais, de sistemas informatizados e de outras tecnologias de informação e comunicação. As evidências e a operacionalização conceitual de um modelo para avaliar a coordenação do cuidado são contribuições relevantes deste estudo, que podem ser aplicadas a outros contextos com características similares.
Collapse
|
21
|
Waibel S, Vargas I, Aller MB, Coderch J, Farré J, Vázquez ML. Continuity of clinical management and information across care levels: perceptions of users of different healthcare areas in the Catalan national health system. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:466. [PMID: 27590595 PMCID: PMC5010665 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1696-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The integration of health care has become a priority in most health systems, as patients increasingly receive care from several professionals in various different settings and institutions, particularly those with chronic conditions and multi-morbidities. Continuity of care is defined as one patient experiencing care over time as connected and coherent with his or her health needs and personal circumstances. The objective is to analyse perceptions of continuity of clinical management and information across care levels and the factors influencing it, from the viewpoint of users of the Catalan national health system. METHODS A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted using a phenomenological approach. A two-stage theoretical sample was selected: (i) the study contexts: healthcare areas in Catalonia with different services management models; (ii) users ≥ 18 years of age who were attended to at both care levels for the same health problem. Data were collected by means of individual semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 49). All interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was conducted segmented by study area, with a mixed generation of categories and triangulation of analysts. RESULTS Patients in all three areas generally perceived that continuity of clinical management across levels existed, on referring to consistent care (same diagnosis and treatment by doctors of both care levels, no incompatibilities of prescribed medications, referrals across levels when needed) and accessibility across levels (timeliness of appointments). In terms of continuity of information, patients in most areas mentioned the existence of information sharing via computer and its adequate usage. Only a few discontinuity elements were reported such as long waiting times for specific tests performed in secondary care or insufficient use of electronic medical records by locum doctors. Different factors influencing continuity were identified by patients, relating to the health system itself (clear distribution of roles between primary and secondary care), health services organizations (care coordination mechanisms, co-location, insufficient resources) and physicians (willingness to collaborate, commitment to patient care, the primary care physician's technical competence). CONCLUSIONS Care continuity across care levels is experienced by patients in the areas studied, with certain exceptions that highlight where there is room for improvement. Influencing factors offer valuable insights on where to direct coordination efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Waibel
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Av. Tibidabo 21, 08022, Barcelona, Spain. .,Department for Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Preventive Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Av. de Can Domènech 737, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Spain.
| | - Ingrid Vargas
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Av. Tibidabo 21, 08022, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta-Beatriz Aller
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Av. Tibidabo 21, 08022, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Coderch
- Grup de Recerca en Serveis Sanitaris i Resultats en Salut, Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Carrer Hospital 17-19 Edifici Fleming, Palamós, 17230, Spain
| | - Joan Farré
- Centre Integral de Salut Cotxers, Av. de Borbó 18 - 30, Barcelona, 08016, Spain
| | - M Luisa Vázquez
- Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Av. Tibidabo 21, 08022, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kuluski K, Gandhi S, Diong C, Steele Gray C, Bronskill SE. Patterns of community follow-up, subsequent health service use and survival among young and mid-life adults discharged from chronic care hospitals: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:382. [PMID: 27522347 PMCID: PMC4983410 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1631-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the demand for rehabilitation and chronic care services across the life course, policy and care strategies tend to focus on older adults and overlook medically complex younger adult populations. This study examined young and mid-life adults discharged from tertiary chronic care hospitals in order to describe their health service use and to examine the association between patterns of timely community follow-up, and subsequent health outcomes. METHODS This population-based retrospective cohort study used linked administrative data to identify 1,906 individuals aged 18-64 years and discharged alive from tertiary chronic care hospitals in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the effect of community follow-up within 7 days of discharge (home care and/or a primary care physician visit or neither) on time to first hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visit. Five-year survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS The cohort had a high prevalence of multi-morbidity and use of hospital, emergency services and physician services was high in the year following discharge. Most individuals received follow-up care from a primary care physician and/or home care within 7 days of discharge while 30 % received neither. Within 1 year of discharge, 18 % of individuals died. Among those who survived, time to acute care hospitalization in the year following discharge was significantly longer among those who received both a home care and a physician follow-up visit compared to those who received neither. No significant associations were found between community follow-up and ED visits within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS Immediate community follow-up may reduce subsequent use of acute care services. Future research should determine why some individuals, who would likely benefit from services, are not receiving them including barriers to access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry Kuluski
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System (Bridgepoint Hospital Site), 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, ON M4M 2B5 Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3 M6 Canada
| | - Sima Gandhi
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G123, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3 M5 Canada
| | - Christina Diong
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G123, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3 M5 Canada
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System (Bridgepoint Hospital Site), 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, ON M4M 2B5 Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3 M6 Canada
| | - Susan E. Bronskill
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3 M6 Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G123, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3 M5 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Raji MY, Chen NW, Raji M, Kuo YF. Factors Associated With Seeking Physician Care by Medicare Beneficiaries Who Receive All Their Primary Care From Nurse Practitioners. J Prim Care Community Health 2016; 7:249-57. [PMID: 27456894 DOI: 10.1177/2150131916659674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A shortage of primary care physicians has led to the alternative strategy of nurse practitioners (NPs) as primary care providers for the growing elderly population. Many states have implemented policies that allow NPs to practice independently with no physician oversight. Little is known about the continuity of primary care provided by NPs. OBJECTIVE To examine rate and correlates of switching from exclusive NP primary care to receiving some or all primary care from physicians. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS Medicare beneficiaries (n = 38 618) with diabetes, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who received all their primary care from NPs in 2007. MAIN MEASURES Multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess patient and disease characteristics associated with switching from sole NP primary care in 2007 to receiving some or all primary care from physicians between 2008 and 2010. RESULTS Of elderly patients receiving all their primary care from NPs in 2007, 53.8% switched to receiving some or all primary care from physicians in 2008-2010. The switching patients had less comorbidity before the switch and were more likely to reside in metropolitan areas, ZIP code areas with high education or states with the most restriction on NP scope of practice. In multivariable analyses, significant predictors of switching included one of the following within 30 days before the switch: emergency room visits (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.44-1.68), hospitalization (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.02-1.25), new diagnosis of heart attacks (OR = 5.52, 95% CI = 4.33-7.02), pneumonia (OR = 4.84, 95% CI = 3.71-6.32), atrial fibrillation (OR = 3.99, 95% CI = 2.93-5.44), stroke (OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 2.31-3.74), or cancer (OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.94-3.63). CONCLUSIONS About half of Medicare patients under exclusive NP primary care switched to physicians for some or all primary care over a 3-year period. Future study is needed to understand the reasons for switching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nai-Wei Chen
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Mukaila Raji
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Trivedi I, Holl JL, Hanauer S, Keefer L. Integrating Adolescents and Young Adults into Adult-Centered Care for IBD. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2016; 18:21. [PMID: 27086002 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-016-0495-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Planned healthcare transition, initiated in pediatric care, is a gradual process aimed at fostering the adolescent patient's disease knowledge and skills with the ultimate objective of preparing patients and families for adult-centered care. The process is critical in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) where there is an increased risk of non-adherence, hospitalizations, and emergency department use as young adult patients graduate from pediatric to adult-centered care. While evidence for healthcare transition in IBD is mounting, important gaps remain in the understanding of this process from the perspective of the adult gastroenterologist. This paper summarizes what is known about healthcare transition in IBD and explores the unanswered questions-a conceptual and methodological framework for transition interventions, relevant outcomes that define successful transition, and key stakeholder perspectives. For the adult gastroenterologist managing the young adult patient population, this paper presents the paradigm of "care integration"-a process of ongoing, multi-modality support for the patient, initiated in the adult care setting, with the goal of improving self-management skills and active participation in medical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itishree Trivedi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair Street (20th floor), Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Jane L Holl
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair Street (20th floor), Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 225 E. Chicago Avenue #86, Chicago, 60611, IL, USA
| | - Stephen Hanauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Laurie Keefer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 17 East 102nd Street - 5th Floor, New York, 10029, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Measuring parents' perspective on continuity of care in children with special health care needs. Int J Integr Care 2015; 15:e046. [PMID: 27118963 PMCID: PMC4843181 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Children with special health care needs are an exponentially growing population needing integrated health care programmes that involve primary, community, hospital and tertiary care services. The aims of the study are (1) to develop and validate the Special Needs Kids Questionnaire (SpeNK-Q) designed to measure parents' perspective on continuity of care for children with special health care needs and (2) to evaluate the continuity of care based on parental experiences in this population. METHODS SpeNK-Q was derived from a previous qualitative study and was based on Haggerty's constructs of informational, management and relational continuity. Parents of preterm birth children completed the 20-item SpeNK-Q at the second or subsequent planned follow-up visit after the child's hospital discharge. Principal component analysis was used to examine the structure of the instrument. RESULTS Principal component analysis of 101 questionnaires administered allowed us to identify five factors explaining 60.2% of item variance: informational continuity; coordination of care; continuity of family-paediatrician relationship; family support; information on care plan. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION SpeNK-Q proved to be a psychometrically promising instrument. Its utilisation could improve the identification of areas for service development, the delivery of coordinated care and support policy makers in redesigning integrated services.
Collapse
|
26
|
Cottrell E, Yardley S. Lived experiences of multimorbidity: An interpretative meta-synthesis of patients', general practitioners' and trainees' perceptions. Chronic Illn 2015; 11:279-303. [PMID: 25770097 DOI: 10.1177/1742395315574764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multimorbidity is an increasing challenge. Better understanding of lived experiences of patients, general practitioners and trainees, may advance patient care and medical education. This interpretative meta-synthesis sought to (i) understand lived experiences of patients, general practitioners and trainees regarding multimorbidity, (ii) identify how similarities and differences in experiences should shape future solutions. METHODS Empirical studies containing qualitative data and pertaining to lived experiences from our recent realist synthesis (PROSPERO 2013:CRD42013003862) were included. Following quality assessment, data were extracted from key studies to build an integrated analytic framework. Data from remaining studies were utilised to expand and refine the framework through thematic analysis of concepts within and between perspectives. RESULTS Twenty-one papers were included in the meta-synthesis. Analysis of 70 concepts produced five themes: (1) goals of care and decision making, (2) complexity, (3) meeting expectations, (4) logistics and (5) interpersonal dynamics. The complexities of multimorbidity lead to shared feelings of vulnerability, uncertainty and enforced compromises. Barriers to optimal care-education included system constraints, inadequate continuity and role uncertainty. DISCUSSION There was little evidence of shared discussion of these challenges. Addressing these issues and more explicit exploration of the experiences of each group during interactions may improve delivery and satisfaction in care and education.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ricci-Cabello I, Violán C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Mounce LTA, Valderas JM. Impact of multi-morbidity on quality of healthcare and its implications for health policy, research and clinical practice. A scoping review. Eur J Gen Pract 2015; 21:192-202. [PMID: 26232238 DOI: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1046046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The simultaneous presence of multiple conditions in one patient (multi-morbidity) is a key challenge facing healthcare systems globally. It potentially threatens the coordination, continuity and safety of care. In this paper, we report the results of a scoping review examining the impact of multi-morbidity on the quality of healthcare. We used its results as a basis for a discussion of the challenges that research in this area is currently facing. In addition, we discuss its implications for health policy and clinical practice. The review identified 37 studies focussing on multi-morbidity but using conceptually different approaches. Studies focusing on 'comorbidity' (i.e. the 'index disease' approach) suggested that quality may be enhanced in the presence of synergistic conditions, and impaired by antagonistic or neutral conditions. Studies on 'multi-morbidity' (i.e. multiplicity of problems) and 'morbidity burden' (i.e. the total severity of conditions) suggested that increasing number of conditions and severity may be associated with better quality of healthcare when measured by process or intermediate outcome indicators, but with worse quality when patient-centred measures are used. However, issues related to the conceptualization and measurement of multi-morbidity (inconsistent across studies) and of healthcare quality (restricted to evaluations for each separate condition without incorporating considerations about multi-morbidity itself and its implications for management) compromised the generalizability of these observations. Until these issues are addressed and robust evidence becomes available, clinicians should apply minimally invasive and patient-centred medicine when delivering care for clinically complex patients. Health systems should focus on enhancing primary care centred coordination and continuity of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
- a Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| | - Concepció Violán
- b Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol) , Barcelona , Spain.,c Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) , Spain
| | - Quinti Foguet-Boreu
- b Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol) , Barcelona , Spain.,c Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) , Spain.,d Department of Medical Sciences , School of Medicine, University of Girona , Girona , Spain
| | - Luke T A Mounce
- e Institute for Health Research, University of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter , Exeter , UK
| | - Jose M Valderas
- a Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.,b Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol) , Barcelona , Spain.,c Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) , Spain.,e Institute for Health Research, University of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter , Exeter , UK.,f CIBER en Epidemiologia y Salud P blica (CIBERESP) , Barcelona , Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The performance of integrated health care networks in continuity of care: a qualitative multiple case study of COPD patients. Int J Integr Care 2015. [PMID: 26213524 PMCID: PMC4512888 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Integrated health care networks (IHN) are promoted in numerous countries as a response to fragmented care delivery by providing a coordinated continuum of services to a defined population. However, evidence on their effectiveness and outcome is scarce, particularly considering continuity across levels of care; that is the patient's experience of connected and coherent care received from professionals of the different care levels over time. The objective was to analyse the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients’ perceptions of continuity of clinical management and information across care levels and continuity of relation in IHN of the public health care system of Catalonia. Methods A qualitative multiple case study was conducted, where the cases are COPD patients. A theoretical sample was selected in two stages: (1) study contexts: IHN and (2) study cases consisting of COPD patients. Data were collected by means of individual, semi-structured interviews to the patients, their general practitioners and pulmonologists and review of records. A thematic content analysis segmented by IHN and cases with a triangulation of sources and analysists was carried out. Results COPD patients of all networks perceived that continuity of clinical management was existent due to clear distribution of roles for COPD care across levels, rapid access to care during exacerbations and referrals to secondary care when needed; nevertheless, patients of some networks highlighted too long waiting times to non-urgent secondary care. Physicians generally agreed with patients, however, also indicated unclear distribution of roles, some inadequate referrals and long waiting times to primary care in some networks. Concerning continuity of information, patients across networks considered that their clinical information was transferred across levels via computer and that physicians also used informal communication mechanisms (e-mail, telephone); whereas physicians highlighted numerous problems of the information system, thus the need to use informal communication channels. Finally, regarding continuity of relation, patients of some networks pointed out high turnover of personnel - being frequently seen by locum doctors or assigned to new physicians - which hindered the development of a trusting relationship. Conclusion Study findings suggest a generally perceived adequate performance of IHN in continuity of care but also the existence of a series of difficulties related to all continuity types. Results can provide opportunities to improving the care process of COPD patients but also of patients with other conditions who receive care across the primary and secondary care level.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hill KM, Twiddy M, Hewison J, House AO. Measuring patient-perceived continuity of care for patients with long-term conditions in primary care. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2014; 15:191. [PMID: 25477059 PMCID: PMC4264317 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-014-0191-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 11/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Continuity of care is widely acknowledged as important for patients with multi-morbidity but simple, service-orientated indices cannot capture the full impact of continuity in complex care delivery systems. The patient’s perspective is important to assess outcomes fully and this is challenging because generic measures of patient-perceived continuity are lacking. We investigate the Chao Perception of Continuity (Chao PC) scale to determine its suitability as a measure of continuity of care for patients with a long-term condition (stroke), and co-morbidity, in a primary care setting. Methods Design and Setting: A questionnaire study embedded in a prospective observational cohort study of outcomes for patients following acute stroke. Participants: 168 community dwelling patients (58% male) mean age 68 years a minimum one year post-stroke. Functional status: Barthel Index mean =16. Intervention: A 23-item questionnaire, the Chao Perception of Continuity (Chao PC) scale, sent by post to their place of residence or administered face to face as part of the final cohort study assessment. Results 310 patients were invited to participate; 168 (54%) completed a questionnaire. All 23 questionnaire items were entered into a Principal Component Analysis. Emergent factors from the exploratory analysis were (1) inter-personal trust (relational continuity); (2) interpersonal knowledge and information (informational and relational continuity) and (3) the process of care (managerial continuity). The strongest of these was inter-personal trust. Conclusion The context-specific items in the Chao PC scale are difficult for respondents to interpret in a United Kingdom Primary Care setting resulting in missing data and low response rates. The Chao-PC therefore cannot be recommended for wider application as a general measure of continuity of care without significant modification. Our findings reflect the acknowledged dimensions of continuity and support the concept of continuity of care as a multi-dimensional construct. We demonstrate the overlapping boundaries across the dimensions in the factor structure derived. Trust and interpersonal knowledge are clearly identified as valuable components of any patient-perceived measure of continuity of care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-014-0191-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate M Hill
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
| | - Maureen Twiddy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
| | - Jenny Hewison
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
| | - Allan O House
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Introduction Care coordination is a high-priority area for improvement across healthcare systems, but no consensus definition of care coordination exists. Methods This article reviews published definitions of the term “care coordination,” identifies common themes among them, and presents a broad working definition of care coordination. Results The review identified 57 unique definitions of care coordination, ranging widely in the scope of participants, settings, and care processes included. Five major themes emerged from the definitions: care coordination involves numerous participants, is necessitated by interdependence among participants and activities, requires knowledge of others’ roles and resources, relies on information exchange, and aims to facilitate appropriate healthcare delivery. Only one definition identified included all five themes, and no one theme was found in a clear majority of definitions. The synthesized themes were incorporated into a broad working definition of care coordination, which has resulted in numerous uses (e.g. guide for systematic review of interventions, development of a measures repository, reference for this journal’s recast focus on the subject). Discussion Some ambiguity remains about the definition of care coordination, but the breadth of definitions in use underscores its widespread recognition as important for high-quality care. Even as understanding of care coordination continues to evolve, broad and flexible definitions can help guide the iterative process of developing conceptual models, testing them empirically, refining models, generating evidence about what works best, and ultimately improving the quality of care.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bower P, Hann M, Rick J, Rowe K, Burt J, Roland M, Protheroe J, Richardson G, Reeves D. Multimorbidity and delivery of care for long-term conditions in the English National Health Service: baseline data from a cohort study. J Health Serv Res Policy 2014; 18:29-37. [PMID: 24121834 DOI: 10.1177/1355819613492148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many patients with long-term conditions have multiple conditions. Current delivery of care is not designed around their needs and they may face barriers to effective self-management. This study assessed the relationships between multimorbidity, the delivery of care, and self-management. METHODS We surveyed 2439 patients with long-term conditions concerning their experience of the delivery of care and self-management in England in 2011. We assessed multimorbidity in terms of a count of long-term conditions and the presence of 'probable depression'. We explored the relationships between multimorbidity, patient experience of the delivery of care, and self-management RESULTS Neither measure of multimorbidity was a significant predictor of patients' experience of the delivery of care. Patients with multimorbidity reported higher levels of self-management behaviour, while the presence of depression was associated with less positive attitudes towards self-management. CONCLUSIONS The current data do not demonstrate a consistent impact of multimorbidity on patients' experience of care or on self-management. Further research is required to assess those types of multimorbidity that are associated with significant deficits, or to identify other aspects of care that might be problematic in the context of multiple conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bower
- Professor of Health Services Research, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Psaila K, Schmied V, Fowler C, Kruske S. Discontinuities between maternity and child and family health services: health professional's perceptions. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:4. [PMID: 24387686 PMCID: PMC3893500 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuity in the context of healthcare refers to the perception of the client that care has been connected and coherent over time. For over a decade professionals providing maternity and child and family health (CFH) services in Australia and internationally have emphasised the importance of continuity of care for women, families and children. However, continuity across maternity and CFH services remains elusive. Continuity is defined and implemented in different ways, resulting in fragmentation of care particularly at points of transition from one service or professional to another.This paper examines the concept of continuity across the maternity and CFH service continuum from the perspectives of midwifery, CFH nursing, general practitioner (GP) and practice nurse (PN) professional leaders. METHODS Data were collected as part of a three phase mixed methods study investigating the feasibility of implementing a national approach to CFH services in Australia (CHoRUS study). Representatives from the four participating professional groups were consulted via discussion groups, focus groups and e-conversations, which were recorded and transcribed. In total, 132 professionals participated, including 45 midwives, 60 CFH nurses, 15 general practitioners and 12 practice nurses. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach. RESULTS 'Continuity' was used and applied differently within and across groups. Aspects of care most valued by professionals included continuity preferably characterised by the development of a relationship with the family (relational continuity) and good communication (informational continuity). When considering managerial continuity we found professionals' were most concerned with co-ordination of care within their own service, rather than focusing on the co-ordination between services. CONCLUSION These findings add new perspectives to understanding continuity within the maternity and CFH services continuum of care. All health professionals consulted were committed to a smooth journey for families along the continuum. Commitment to collaboration is required if service gaps are to be addressed particularly at the point of transition of care between services which was found to be particularly problematic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Psaila
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta Campus, Penrith South DC 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| | - Virginia Schmied
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and the Family and Community Health Research Group, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta Campus, Penrith South DC 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| | - Cathrine Fowler
- Child & Family Health Centre for Midwifery, Child & Family Health Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Health University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sue Kruske
- Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gibbons CJ, Kenning C, Coventry PA, Bee P, Bundy C, Fisher L, Bower P. Development of a multimorbidity illness perceptions scale (MULTIPleS). PLoS One 2013; 8:e81852. [PMID: 24376504 PMCID: PMC3869652 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2013] [Accepted: 10/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Illness perceptions are beliefs about the cause, nature and management of illness, which enable patients to make sense of their conditions. These perceptions can predict adjustment and quality of life in patients with single conditions. However, multimorbidity (i.e. patients with multiple long-term conditions) is increasingly prevalent and a key challenge for future health care delivery. The objective of this research was to develop a valid and reliable measure of illness perceptions for multimorbid patients. METHODS Candidate items were derived from previous qualitative research with multimorbid patients. Questionnaires were posted to 1500 patients with two or more exemplar long-term conditions (depression, diabetes, osteoarthritis, coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Data were analysed using factor analysis and Rasch analysis. Rasch analysis is a modern psychometric technique for deriving unidimensional and intervally-scaled questionnaires. RESULTS Questionnaires from 490 eligible patients (32.6% response) were returned. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five potential subscales 'Emotional representations', 'Treatment burden', 'Prioritising conditions', 'Causal links' and 'Activity limitations'. Rasch analysis led to further item reduction and the generation of a summary scale comprising of items from all scales. All scales were unidimensional and free from differential item functioning or local independence of items. All scales were reliable, but for each subscale there were a number of patients who scored at the floor of the scale. CONCLUSIONS The MULTIPleS measure consists of five individual subscales and a 22-item summary scale that measures the perceived impact of multimorbidity. All scales showed good fit to the Rasch model and preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. A number of patients scored at floor of each subscale, which may reflect variation in the perception of multimorbidity. The MULTIPleS measure will facilitate research into the impact of illness perceptions on adjustment, clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in patients with multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J. Gibbons
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Cassandra Kenning
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter A. Coventry
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Penny Bee
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Bundy
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Fisher
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
A tool for assessing continuity of care across care levels: an extended psychometric validation of the CCAENA questionnaire. Int J Integr Care 2013; 13:e050. [PMID: 24363638 PMCID: PMC3860582 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Revised: 10/08/2013] [Accepted: 10/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The CCAENA questionnaire was developed to assess care continuity across levels from the patients’ perspective. The aim is to provide additional evidence on the psychometric properties of the scales of this questionnaire. Methods Cross-sectional study by means of a survey of a random sample of 1500 patients attended in primary and secondary care in three health care areas of the Catalan health care system. Data were collected in 2010 using the CCAENA questionnaire. To assess psychometric properties, an exploratory factor analysis was performed (construct validity) and the item-rest correlations and Cronbach's alpha were calculated (internal consistency). Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated (multidimensionality) and the ability to discriminate between groups was tested. Results The factor analysis resulted in 21 items grouped into three factors: patient–primary care provider relationship, patient–secondary care provider relationship and continuity across care levels. Cronbach's alpha indicated good internal consistency (0.97, 0.93, 0.80) and the correlation coefficients indicated that dimensions can be interpreted as separated scales. Scales discriminated patients according to health care area, age and educational level. Conclusion The CCAENA questionnaire has proved to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring patients’ perceptions of continuity. Providers and researchers could apply the questionnaire to identify areas for health care improvement.
Collapse
|
35
|
Burgess C, Cowie L, Gulliford M. Patients' perceptions of error in long-term illness care: qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012; 17:181-7. [PMID: 22807556 DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore patients' perceptions of events that may represent errors in long-term illness care and evaluate potential associations with dimensions of quality in health care. METHODS Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with 33 patients with long-term conditions. RESULTS Patients' accounts revealed experiences of errors arising from health care. Errors of access included difficulties of gate-keeping leading to problems in gaining access to primary care consultations, diagnostic tests and specialist care. Potential harms included delayed diagnosis or delayed delivery of specialist care. Errors of interpersonal care included patients' perceptions of not being taken seriously, including perceived failure by professionals to respond adequately to reports of adverse drug reactions or accounts of painful symptoms. Potential harms included continuing medication-related symptoms, negative emotional reactions and breakdown in communication between patients and professionals. Errors were noted at transitions between primary and secondary care including failures of information transfer and communication. CONCLUSIONS Problems of gaining access to care and problems at transitions between levels of care may sometimes constitute errors, but they may also give rise to circumstances in which errors occur. Interpersonal and communication problems may also be associated with errors. There appears to be a close relationship between broader concepts of quality of care and the concept of patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Burgess
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Measuring continuity of care: psychometric properties of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62:e949-57. [PMID: 22782001 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12x652364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ) was developed. It aims to measure continuity of care from the patient perspective across primary and secondary care settings. Initial pilot testing proved promising. AIM To further examine the validity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the NCQ. DESIGN A prospective psychometric instrument validation study in primary and secondary care in the Netherlands. METHOD The NCQ was administered to patients with a chronic disease recruited from general practice (n = 145) and hospital outpatient departments (n = 123) (response rate 76%). A principal component analysis was performed to confirm three subscales that had been found previously. Construct validity was tested by correlating the NCQ score to scores of other scales measuring quality of care, continuity, trust, and satisfaction. Discriminative ability was tested by investigating differences in continuity subscores of different subgroups. Test-retest reliability was analysed in 172 patients. RESULTS Principal factor analysis confirmed the previously found three continuity subscales - personal continuity, care provider knows me; personal continuity, care provider shows commitment; and team/cross-boundary continuity. Construct validity was demonstrated through expected correlations with other variables and discriminative ability through expected differences in continuity subscores of different subgroups. Test-retest reliability was high (the intraclass correlation coefficient varied between 0.71 and 0.82). CONCLUSION This study provides evidence for the validity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the NCQ. The NCQ can be of value to identify problems in continuity of care.
Collapse
|
37
|
Patient journey: implications for improving and integrating care for older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can J Aging 2012; 31:223-33. [PMID: 22647664 DOI: 10.1017/s0714980812000086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Many patients, particularly older patients, interact with multiple providers while accessing health care services in a variety of different settings over extended periods of time. Understanding older patients' experiences of their journeys through the health system is critical to improving service integration and quality of care. In this study, we have summarized the experiences of four patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as they interacted with the health care system over a three-month period following hospital discharge. Guided by case study methodology, we gathered data through semi-structured interviews and patient logs. Three overarching themes - social support, system navigation, and access - emerged from the data. Attending to provider-patient and provider-provider communication, and to patient social support and self-care needs, could improve integration and care outcomes. Achieving what patients perceive as an integrated and effective system will require time and commitment.
Collapse
|
38
|
Uijen AA, Heinst CW, Schellevis FG, van den Bosch WJHM, van de Laar FA, Terwee CB, Schers HJ. Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012; 7:e42256. [PMID: 22860100 PMCID: PMC3409169 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2012] [Accepted: 07/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuity of care is widely acknowledged as a core value in family medicine. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the instruments measuring continuity of care and to assess the quality of their measurement properties. METHODS We did a systematic review using the PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, with an extensive search strategy including 'continuity of care', 'coordination of care', 'integration of care', 'patient centered care', 'case management' and its linguistic variations. We searched from 1995 to October 2011 and included articles describing the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of instruments measuring one or more dimensions of continuity of care (1) care from the same provider who knows and follows the patient (personal continuity), (2) communication and cooperation between care providers in one care setting (team continuity), and (3) communication and cooperation between care providers in different care settings (cross-boundary continuity). We assessed the methodological quality of the measurement properties of each instrument using the COSMIN checklist. RESULTS We included 24 articles describing the development and/or evaluation of 21 instruments. Ten instruments measured all three dimensions of continuity of care. Instruments were developed for different groups of patients or providers. For most instruments, three or four of the six measurement properties were assessed (mostly internal consistency, content validity, structural validity and construct validity). Six instruments scored positive on the quality of at least three of six measurement properties. CONCLUSIONS Most included instruments have problems with either the number or quality of its assessed measurement properties or the ability to measure all three dimensions of continuity of care. Based on the results of this review, we recommend the use of one of the four most promising instruments, depending on the target population Diabetes Continuity of Care Questionnaire, Alberta Continuity of Services Scale-Mental Health, Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire, and Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemarie A Uijen
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|