1
|
Jones B. Modelling of RBE differences in selected points within similar spread-out Bragg-peaks (SOBP) placed at superficial and deep water phantom locations in passively scattered beams but not in scanned pencil beams: A hypothesis. Phys Med 2024; 124:104488. [PMID: 39074409 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To model relative biological effectiveness (RBE) differences found in two studies which used spread-out Bragg-peaks (SOBP) placed at (a) superficial depth and (b) at the maximum range depth. For pencil beam scanning (PBS), RBE at similar points within the SOBP did not change between the two extreme SOBP placement depths; in passively scattered beams (PSB), high RBE values (typically 1.2-1.3) were found within superficially- placed SOBP but reduced to lower values (1-1.07) at similar points within the extreme-depth positioned SOBP. The dose, LET (linear energy transfer) distributions along each SOBP were closely comparable regardless of placement depth, but significant changes in dose rate occurred with depth in the PSB beam. METHODS The equations used allow α and β changes with falling dose rate (the converse to FLASH studies) in PSB, resulting in reduced α/β ratios, compatible with a reduction in micro-volumetric energy transfer (the product of Fluence and LET), with commensurate reductions in RBE. The experimental depth-distances, positions within SOBP, observed dose-rates and radiosensitivity ratios were used to estimate the changes in RBE. RESULTS RBE values within a 5 % tolerance limit of the experimental results for PSB were found at the deepest SOBP placement. No RBE changes were predicted for PBS beams, as in the published results. CONCLUSIONS Enhanced proton therapy toxicity might occur with PBS when compared with PSB for deeply positioned SOBP due to the maintenance of higher RBE. Scanned pencil beam users need to be vigilant about RBE and further research is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bleddyn Jones
- Gray Laboratory, University of Oxford, Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang X, Wan Chan Tseung H, Moseley D, Zverovitch A, Hughes CO, George J, Johnson JE, Breen WG, Qian J. Deep learning based linear energy transfer calculation for proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115058. [PMID: 38714191 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
Objective.This study aims to address the limitations of traditional methods for calculating linear energy transfer (LET), a critical component in assessing relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Currently, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, the gold-standard for accuracy, is resource-intensive and slow for dose optimization, while the speedier analytical approximation has compromised accuracy. Our objective was to prototype a deep-learning-based model for calculating dose-averaged LET (LETd) using patient anatomy and dose-to-water (DW) data, facilitating real-time biological dose evaluation and LET optimization within proton treatment planning systems.Approach. 275 4-field prostate proton Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy plans were analyzed, rendering a total of 1100 fields. Those were randomly split into 880, 110, and 110 fields for training, validation, and testing. A 3D Cascaded UNet model, along with data processing and inference pipelines, was developed to generate patient-specific LETddistributions from CT images and DW. The accuracy of the LETdof the test dataset was evaluated against MC-generated ground truth through voxel-based mean absolute error (MAE) and gamma analysis.Main results.The proposed model accurately inferred LETddistributions for each proton field in the test dataset. A single-field LETdcalculation took around 100 ms with trained models running on a NVidia A100 GPU. The selected model yielded an average MAE of 0.94 ± 0.14 MeV cm-1and a gamma passing rate of 97.4% ± 1.3% when applied to the test dataset, with the largest discrepancy at the edge of fields where the dose gradient was the largest and counting statistics was the lowest.Significance.This study demonstrates that deep-learning-based models can efficiently calculate LETdwith high accuracy as a fast-forward approach. The model shows great potential to be utilized for optimizing the RBE of proton treatment plans. Future efforts will focus on enhancing the model's performance and evaluating its adaptability to different clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueyan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Hok Wan Chan Tseung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Douglas Moseley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | | | - Cian O Hughes
- Google Inc, Mountain View, CA, United States of America
| | - Jon George
- Google Inc, Mountain View, CA, United States of America
| | - Jedediah E Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Jing Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Afshari N, Koturbash I, Boerma M, Newhauser W, Kratz M, Willey J, Williams J, Chancellor J. A Review of Numerical Models of Radiation Injury and Repair Considering Subcellular Targets and the Extracellular Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:1015. [PMID: 38256089 PMCID: PMC10816679 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25021015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Astronauts in space are subject to continuous exposure to ionizing radiation. There is concern about the acute and late-occurring adverse health effects that astronauts could incur following a protracted exposure to the space radiation environment. Therefore, it is vital to consider the current tools and models used to describe and study the organic consequences of ionizing radiation exposure. It is equally important to see where these models could be improved. Historically, radiobiological models focused on how radiation damages nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and the role DNA repair mechanisms play in resulting biological effects, building on the hypotheses of Crowther and Lea from the 1940s and 1960s, and they neglected other subcellular targets outside of nuclear DNA. The development of these models and the current state of knowledge about radiation effects impacting astronauts in orbit, as well as how the radiation environment and cellular microenvironment are incorporated into these radiobiological models, aid our understanding of the influence space travel may have on astronaut health. It is vital to consider the current tools and models used to describe the organic consequences of ionizing radiation exposure and identify where they can be further improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nousha Afshari
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA; (N.A.); (W.N.)
| | - Igor Koturbash
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Marjan Boerma
- Division of Radiation Health, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Wayne Newhauser
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA; (N.A.); (W.N.)
| | - Maria Kratz
- Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA;
| | - Jeffrey Willey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA;
| | - Jacqueline Williams
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA;
| | - Jeffery Chancellor
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA; (N.A.); (W.N.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
- Outer Space Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chakraborty MA, Khan AJ, Cahlon O, Xu AJ, Braunstein LZ, Powell SN, Choi JI. Proton Reirradiation for High-Risk Recurrent or New Primary Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5722. [PMID: 38136268 PMCID: PMC10742022 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an integral component of multidisciplinary breast cancer care. Given how commonly radiotherapy is used in the treatment of breast cancer, many patients with recurrences have received previous radiotherapy. Patients with new primary breast cancer may also have received previous radiotherapy to the thoracic region. Curative doses and comprehensive field photon reirradiation (reRT) have often been avoided in these patients due to concerns for severe toxicities to organs-at-risk (OARs), such as the heart, lungs, brachial plexus, and soft tissue. However, many patients may benefit from definitive-intent reRT, such as patients with high-risk disease features such as lymph node involvement and dermal/epidermal invasion. Proton therapy is a potentially advantageous treatment option for delivery of reRT due to its lack of exit dose and greater conformality that allow for enhanced non-target tissue sparing of previously irradiated tissues. In this review, we discuss the clinical applications of proton therapy for patients with breast cancer requiring reRT, the currently available literature and how it compares to historical photon reRT outcomes, treatment planning considerations, and questions in this area warranting further study. Given the dosimetric advantages of protons and the data reported to date, proton therapy is a promising option for patients who would benefit from the added locoregional disease control provided by reRT for recurrent or new primary breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly A. Chakraborty
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Atif J. Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Amy J. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Lior Z. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Simon N. Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Juvkam IS, Zlygosteva O, Sitarz M, Thiede B, Sørensen BS, Malinen E, Edin NJ, Søland TM, Galtung HK. Proton Compared to X-Irradiation Induces Different Protein Profiles in Oral Cancer Cells and Their Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16983. [PMID: 38069306 PMCID: PMC10707519 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound particles released from cells, and their cargo can alter the function of recipient cells. EVs from X-irradiated cells have been shown to play a likely role in non-targeted effects. However, EVs derived from proton irradiated cells have not yet been studied. We aimed to investigate the proteome of EVs and their cell of origin after proton or X-irradiation. The EVs were derived from a human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell line exposed to 0, 4, or 8 Gy from either protons or X-rays. The EVs and irradiated OSCC cells underwent liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for protein identification. Interestingly, we found different protein profiles both in the EVs and in the OSCC cells after proton irradiation compared to X-irradiation. In the EVs, we found that protons cause a downregulation of proteins involved in cell growth and DNA damage response compared to X-rays. In the OSCC cells, proton and X-irradiation induced dissimilar cell death pathways and distinct DNA damage repair systems. These results are of potential importance for understanding how non-targeted effects in normal tissue can be limited and for future implementation of proton therapy in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Solgård Juvkam
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway; (I.S.J.); (T.M.S.)
- Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Olga Zlygosteva
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway; (O.Z.); (N.J.E.)
| | - Mateusz Sitarz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (M.S.); (B.S.S.)
| | - Bernd Thiede
- Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (M.S.); (B.S.S.)
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway; (O.Z.); (N.J.E.)
| | - Nina Jeppesen Edin
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway; (O.Z.); (N.J.E.)
| | - Tine Merete Søland
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway; (I.S.J.); (T.M.S.)
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Kanli Galtung
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway; (I.S.J.); (T.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Almhagen E, Dasu A, Johansson S, Traneus E, Ahnesjö A. Plan robustness and RBE influence for proton dose painting by numbers for head and neck cancers. Phys Med 2023; 115:103157. [PMID: 37939480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of dose painting by numbers (DPBN) with respect to robustness for proton therapy for head and neck cancers (HNC), and to study the influence of variable RBE on the TCP and OAR dose burden. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data for 19 patients who have been scanned pretreatment with PET-FDG and subsequently treated with photon therapy were used in the study. A dose response model developed for photon therapy was implemented in a TPS, allowing DPBN plans to be created. Conventional homogeneous dose and DPBN plans were created for each patient, optimized with either fixed RBE = 1.1 or a variable RBE model. Robust optimization was used to create clinically acceptable plans. To estimate the maximum potential loss in TCP due to actual SUV variations from the pre-treatment imaging, we applied a test case with randomized SUV distribution. RESULTS Regardless of the use of variable RBE for optimization or evaluation, a statistically significant increase (p < 0.001) in TCP was found for DPBN plans as compared to homogeneous dose plans. Randomizing the SUV distribution decreased the TCP for all plans. A correlation between TCP increase and variance of the SUV distribution and target volume was also found. CONCLUSION DPBN for protons and HNC is feasible and could lead to a TCP gain. Risks associated with the temporal variation of SUV distributions could be mitigated by imposing minimum doses to targets. The correlation found between TCP increase and SUV variance and target volume may be used for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Almhagen
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden; The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden; The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Silvia Johansson
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Ahnesjö
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zlygosteva O, Juvkam IS, Arous D, Sitarz M, Sørensen BS, Ankjærgaard C, Andersen CE, Galtung HK, Søland TM, Edin NJ, Malinen E. Acute normal tissue responses in a murine model following fractionated irradiation of the head and neck with protons or X-rays. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1574-1580. [PMID: 37703217 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate acute normal tissue responses in the head and neck region following proton- or X-irradiation of a murine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Female C57BL/6J mice were irradiated with protons (25 or 60 MeV) or X-rays (100 kV). The radiation field covered the oral cavity and the major salivary glands. For protons, two different treatment plans were used, either with the Bragg Peak in the middle of the mouse (BP) or outside the mouse (transmission mode; TM). Delivered physical doses were 41, 45, and 65 Gy given in 6, 7, and 10 fractions for BP, TM, and X-rays, respectively. Alanine dosimetry was used to assess delivered doses. Oral mucositis and dermatitis were scored using CTC v.2.0-based tables. Saliva was collected at baseline, right after end of irradiation, and at day 35. RESULTS The measured dose distribution for protons (TM) and X-rays was very similar. Oral mucositis appeared earlier, had a higher score and was found in a higher percentage of mice after proton irradiation compared to X-irradiation. Dermatitis, on the other hand, had a similar appearance after protons and X-rays. Compared to controls, saliva production was lower right after termination of proton- and X-irradiation. The BP group demonstrated saliva recovery compared to the TM and X-ray group at day 35. CONCLUSION With lower delivered doses, proton irradiation resulted in similar skin reactions and increased oral mucositis compared to X-irradiation. This indicates that the relative biological effectiveness of protons for acute tissue responses in the mouse head and neck is greater than the clinical standard of 1.1. Thus, there is a need for further investigations of the biological effect of protons in normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Zlygosteva
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inga Solgård Juvkam
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Delmon Arous
- Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mateusz Sitarz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Claus E Andersen
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Hilde Kanli Galtung
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tine Merete Søland
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Jeppesen Edin
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gordon K, Smyk D, Gulidov I, Golubev K, Fatkhudinov T. An Overview of Head and Neck Tumor Reirradiation: What Has Been Achieved So Far? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4409. [PMID: 37686685 PMCID: PMC10486419 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The recurrence rate of head and neck cancers (HNCs) after initial treatment may reach 70%, and poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Curative options for recurrent HNCs mainly depend on the treatment history and the recurrent tumor localization. Reirradiation for HNCs is effective and has been included in most guidelines. However, the option remains clinically challenging due to high incidence of severe toxicity, especially in cases of quick infield recurrence. Recent technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) provide the means for upgrade in reirradiation protocols. While the majority of hospitals stay focused on conventional and widely accessible modulated RTs, the particle therapy options emerge as tolerable and providing further treatment opportunities for recurrent HNCs. Still, the progress is impeded by high heterogeneity of the data and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This review aimed to summarize the outcomes of reirradiation for HNCs in the clinical perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Gordon
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Daniil Smyk
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Igor Gulidov
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
| | - Kirill Golubev
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
| | - Timur Fatkhudinov
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kong X, Wang Y, Huang J, Zhang W, Du C, Yin Y, Xue H, Gao H, Liu K, Wu T, Sun L. Microdosimetric assessment about proton spread-out Bragg peak at different depths based on the normal human mesh-type cell population model. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:175010. [PMID: 37578025 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acec2b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Objective.In clinical proton therapy, the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) is commonly used to fit the target shape. Dose depositions at microscopic sites vary, even with a consistent absorbed dose (D) in SOBP. In the present study, monolayer mesh-type cell population models were developed for microdosimetric assessment at different SOBP depths.Approach.Normal human bronchial epithelial (BEAS-2B) and hepatocytes (L-O2) mesh-type cell models were constructed based on fluorescence tomography images of normal human cells. Particle transport simulation in cell populations was performed coupled with Monte Carlo software PHITS. The relationship between microdosimetry and macrodosimetry of SOBP at different depths was described by analyzing the microdosimetric indicators such as specific energyz,specific energy distributionfz,D,and relative standard deviationσz/z¯within cells. Additionally, the microdosimetric distributions characteristics and their contributing factors were also discussed.Main results.The microscopic dose distribution is strongly influenced by cellular size, shape, and material. The mean specific energyz¯of nucleus and cytoplasm in the cell population is greater than the overall absorbed dose of the cell population model (Dp), with a maximumz¯/Dpof 1.1. The cellular dose distribution is different between the BEAS-2B mesh-type model and its concentric ellipsoid geometry-type model, which difference inz¯is about 10.3% for the nucleus and about 7.5% for the cytoplasm with the SOBP depth of 15 cm. WhenD= 2 Gy, the maximumzof L-O2 nucleus reaches 2.8 Gy andσz/z¯is 5.1% at the mid-depth SOBP (16-18 cm); while the maximumzof the BEAS-2B nucleus reaches 2.2 Gy with only 2.7% ofσz/z¯.Significance.The significant variation of microdosimetric distributions of SOBP different depths indicates the necessity to use mesh-type cell population models, which have the potential to be compared with biological results and build the bio-physical model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianghui Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Yidi Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiachen Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenyue Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuansheng Du
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuchen Yin
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Huiyuan Xue
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Han Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Kun Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| | - Liang Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wanstall HC, Henthorn NT, Jones J, Santina E, Chadwick AL, Angal-Kalinin D, Morris G, Warmenhoven JW, Smith R, Mathisen S, Merchant MJ, Jones RM. Quantification of damage to plasmid DNA from 35 MeV electrons, 228 MeV protons and 300 kVp X-rays in varying hydroxyl radical scavenging environments. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023:7153712. [PMID: 37154587 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The pBR322 plasmid DNA was irradiated with 35 MeV electrons, 228 MeV protons and 300 kVp X-rays to quantify DNA damage and make comparisons of DNA damage between radiation modalities. Plasmid was irradiated in a medium containing hydroxyl radical scavengers in varying concentrations. This altered the amount of indirect hydroxyl-mediated DNA damage, to create an environment that is more closely associated with a biological cell. We show that increasing hydroxyl scavenger concentration significantly reduced post-irradiation DNA damage to pBR322 plasmid DNA consistently and equally with three radiation modalities. At low scavenging capacities, irradiation with both 35 MeV electrons and 228 MeV protons resulted in increased DNA damage per dose compared with 300 kVp X-rays. We quantify both single-strand break (SSB) and double-strand break (DSB) induction between the modalities as a ratio of yields relative to X-rays, referred to as relative biological effectiveness (RBE). RBESSB values of 1.16 ± 0.15 and 1.18 ± 0.08 were calculated for protons and electrons, respectively, in a low hydroxyl scavenging environment containing 1 mM Tris-HCl for SSB induction. In higher hydroxyl scavenging capacity environments (above 1.1 × 106 s-1), no significant differences in DNA damage induction were found between radiation modalities when using SSB induction as a measure of RBE. Considering DSB induction, significant differences were only found between X-rays and 35 MeV electrons, with an RBEDSB of 1.72 ± 0.91 for 35 MeV electrons, indicating that electrons result in significantly more SSBs and DSBs per unit of dose than 300 kVp X-rays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah C Wanstall
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
| | - Nicholas T Henthorn
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - James Jones
- The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
- ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
| | - Elham Santina
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Amy L Chadwick
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Deepa Angal-Kalinin
- The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
- ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
| | - Geoffrey Morris
- The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
- ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
| | - John-William Warmenhoven
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Rob Smith
- The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
- ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
| | - Storm Mathisen
- The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
- ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
| | - Michael J Merchant
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Roger M Jones
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A systematic review of clinical studies on variable proton Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE). Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:79-92. [PMID: 35988776 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Recently, a number of clinical studies have explored links between possible Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) elevations and patient toxicities and/or image changes following proton therapy. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of such studies. We applied a "Problem [RBE], Intervention [Protons], Population [Patients], Outcome [Side effect]" search strategy to the PubMed database. From our search, we retrieved studies which: (a) performed novel voxel-wise analyses of patient effects versus physical dose and LET (n = 13), and (b) compared image changes between proton and photon cohorts with regard to proton RBE (n = 9). For each retrieved study, we extracted data regarding: primary tumour type; size of patient cohort; type of image change studied; image-registration method (deformable or rigid); LET calculation method, and statistical methodology. We compared and contrasted their methods in order to discuss the weight of clinical evidence for variable proton RBE. We concluded that clinical evidence for variable proton RBE remains statistically weak at present. Our principal recommendation is that proton centres and clinical trial teams collaborate to standardize follow-up protocols and statistical analysis methods, so that larger patient cohorts can ultimately be considered for RBE analyses.
Collapse
|
12
|
Chargari C, Escande A, Dupuis P, Thariat J. Reirradiation: A complex situation. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:911-915. [PMID: 35987812 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Reirradiation of a tumor recurrence or second cancer in a previously irradiated area is challenging due to lack of high-quality physical, radiobiological, clinical data and inherent substantial risks of toxicity with cumulative dose and uncertain tissue recovery. Yet, major advances have been made in radiotherapy techniques, that have the potential to achieve cure while limiting severe toxicity rates, but still much research is necessary to better appraise the therapeutic index in such a complex situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chargari
- Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - A Escande
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France; Faculté de médecine Henri-Warembourg, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France; UMR 9189, Centre de recherche en informatique, signal et automatique de Lille (Cristal), 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
| | - P Dupuis
- Léon Bérard Cancer Center, University of Lyon, 69373 Lyon, France
| | - J Thariat
- Francois Baclesse Cancer center. Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534-ARCHADE, Unicaen-Université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heuchel L, Hahn C, Pawelke J, Sørensen BS, Dosanjh M, Lühr A. Clinical use and future requirements of relative biological effectiveness: survey among all european proton therapy centres. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:134-139. [PMID: 35605747 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) varies along the treatment field. However, in clinical practice, a constant RBE of 1.1 is assumed, which can result in undesirable side effects. This study provides an accurate overview of current clinical practice for considering proton RBE in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS A survey was devised and sent to all proton therapy centres in Europe that treat patients. The online questionnaire consisted of 39 questions addressing various aspects of RBE consideration in clinical practice, including treatment planning, patient follow-up and future demands. RESULTS All 25 proton therapy centres responded. All centres prescribed a constant RBE of 1.1, but also applied measures (except for one eye treatment centre) to counteract variable RBE effects such as avoiding beams stopping inside or in front of an organ at risk and putting restrictions on the minimum number and opening angle of incident beams for certain treatment sites. For the future, most centres (16) asked for more retrospective or prospective outcome studies investigating the potential effect of the effect of a variable RBE. To perform such studies, 18 centres asked for LET and RBE calculation and visualisation tools developed by treatment planning system vendors. CONCLUSION All European proton centres are aware of RBE variability but comply with current guidelines of prescribing a constant RBE. However, they actively mitigate uncertainty and risk of side effects resulting from increased RBE by applying measures and restrictions during treatment planning. To change RBE-related clinical guidelines in the future more clinical data on RBE are explicitly demanded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Heuchel
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Germany
| | - Christian Hahn
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, DCPT, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Manjit Dosanjh
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, UK; CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Armin Lühr
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jones B. Risk assessment for proton therapy in the central nervous system by assuming small increments in RBE. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
15
|
Radiation induced contrast enhancement after proton beam therapy in patients with low grade glioma - How safe are protons? Radiother Oncol 2021; 167:211-218. [PMID: 34973277 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal treatment strategy for low-grade glioma (LGG) is still a matter of controversy. Considering that the prognosis is typically favorable, the prevention of late sequelae is of particular importance. Proton beam therapy (PRT) has the potential to further reduce the burden of treatment related side effects. We set out to evaluate the clinical outcome of proton irradiation with a particular focus on morphologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS We assessed prospectively 110 patients who received radiotherapy with protons for histologically proven LGG. Clinical and radiological information were analyzed resulting in more than 1200 available MRI examinations with a median follow-up of 39 months. Newly diagnosed contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI were delineated and correlated with parameters of the corresponding treatment plan. A voxel-based dose-matched paired analysis of the linear energy transfer (LET) inside vs outside lesions was performed. RESULTS Proton beam irradiation of patients with low-grade glioma results in overall survival (OS) of 90% after seven years. Median progression free survival had not yet been reached with surviving fraction of 54% after seven years. The incidence of temporary or clinically silent radiation induced contrast enhancement was significantly higher than previously assumed, however, symptomatic radiation necrosis was only detected in one patient. These radiation-induced contrast-enhancing lesions were almost exclusively seen at the distal beam end of the proton beam. In 22 out of 23 patients, the average LET of voxels inside contrast-enhancing lesions was significantly increased, compared to dose-matched voxels outside the lesions. CONCLUSION Symptomatic radiation necrosis following PRT was as rare as conventional photon-based treatment series suggest. However, the increased incidence of asymptomatic radiation-induced brain injuries with an increased average LET observed in this cohort provides strong clinical evidence to support the hypothesis that the relative biological effectiveness of protons is variable and different to the fixed factor of 1.1 currently used worldwide.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lohberger B, Glänzer D, Eck N, Kerschbaum-Gruber S, Mara E, Deycmar S, Madl T, Kashofer K, Georg P, Leithner A, Georg D. Activation of efficient DNA repair mechanisms after photon and proton irradiation of human chondrosarcoma cells. Sci Rep 2021; 11:24116. [PMID: 34916568 PMCID: PMC8677811 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03529-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Although particle therapy with protons has proven to be beneficial in the treatment of chondrosarcoma compared to photon-based (X-ray) radiation therapy, the cellular and molecular mechanisms have not yet been sufficiently investigated. Cell viability and colony forming ability were analyzed after X-ray and proton irradiation (IR). Cell cycle was analyzed using flow cytometry and corresponding regulator genes and key players of the DNA repair mechanisms were measured using next generation sequencing, protein expression and immunofluorescence staining. Changes in metabolic phenotypes were determined with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Both X-ray and proton IR resulted in reduced cell survival and a G2/M phase arrest of the cell cycle. Especially 1 h after IR, a significant dose-dependent increase of phosphorylated γH2AX foci was observed. This was accompanied with a reprogramming in cellular metabolism. Interestingly, within 24 h the majority of clearly visible DNA damages were repaired and the metabolic phenotype restored. Involved DNA repair mechanisms are, besides the homology directed repair (HDR) and the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), especially the mismatch mediated repair (MMR) pathway with the key players EXO1, MSH3, and PCNA. Chondrosarcoma cells regenerates the majority of DNA damages within 24 h. These molecular mechanisms represent an important basis for an improved therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Lohberger
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5-7, 8036, Graz, Austria.
| | - Dietmar Glänzer
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5-7, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Nicole Eck
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5-7, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Sylvia Kerschbaum-Gruber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Mara
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- University of Applied Science, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Simon Deycmar
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, University Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Madl
- Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University of Graz, 8010, Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, 8010, Graz, Austria
| | - Karl Kashofer
- Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, 8010, Graz, Austria
| | - Petra Georg
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Andreas Leithner
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5-7, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moore JW, Woolley TE, Hopewell JW, Jones B. Further development of spinal cord retreatment dose estimation: including radiotherapy with protons and light ions. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:1657-1666. [PMID: 34524068 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1981554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to aid in the assessment of changes in the radiation tolerance of spinal cord/similar central nervous system tissues with time between two individual treatment courses. METHODS The GUI allows any combination of photons, protons (or ions) to be used as the initial, or retreatment, radiotherapy courses. Allowances for clinical circumstances, of reduced tolerance, can also be made. The radiobiological model was published previously and has been incorporated with additional checks and safety features, to be as safe to use as possible. The proton option includes use of a fixed RBE of 1.1 (set as the default), or a variable RBE, the latter depending on the proton linear energy transfer (LET) for organs at risk. This second LET-based approach can also be used for ions, by changing the LET parameters. RESULTS GUI screenshots are used to show the input and output parameters for different clinical situations used in worked examples. The results from the GUI are in agreement with manual calculations, but the results are now rapidly available without tedious and error-prone manual computations. The software outputs provide a maximum dose limit boundary, which should not be exceeded. Clinicians may also choose to further lower the number of treatment fractions, whilst using the same dose per fraction (or conversely a lower dose per fraction but with the same number of fractions) in order to achieve the intended clinical benefit as safely as possible. CONCLUSIONS The new GUI will allow scientific-based estimations of time related radiation tolerance changes in the spinal cord and similar central nervous tissues (optic chiasm, brainstem), which can be used to guide the choice of retreatment dose fractionation schedules, with either photons, protons or ions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua W Moore
- Cardiff School of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Bleddyn Jones
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Gray Laboratory, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sørensen BS, Pawelke J, Bauer J, Burnet NG, Dasu A, Høyer M, Karger CP, Krause M, Schwarz M, Underwood TSA, Wagenaar D, Whitfield GA, Lühr A. Does the uncertainty in relative biological effectiveness affect patient treatment in proton therapy? Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:177-184. [PMID: 34480959 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Clinical treatment with protons uses the concept of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) to convert the absorbed dose into an RBE-weighted dose that equals the dose for radiotherapy with photons causing the same biological effect. Currently, in proton therapy a constant RBE of 1.1 is generically used. However, empirical data indicate that the RBE is not constant, but increases at the distal edge of the proton beam. This increase in RBE is of concern, as the clinical impact is still unresolved, and clinical studies demonstrating a clinical effect of an increased RBE are emerging. Within the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) work package 6 on radiobiology and RBE, a workshop was held in February 2020 in Manchester with one day of discussion dedicated to the impact of proton RBE in a clinical context. Current data on RBE effects, patient outcome and modelling from experimental as well as clinical studies were presented and discussed. Furthermore, representatives from European clinical proton therapy centres, who were involved in patient treatment, laid out their current clinical practice on how to consider the risk of a variable RBE in their centres. In line with the workshop, this work considers the actual impact of RBE issues on patient care in proton therapy by reviewing preclinical data on the relation between linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE, current clinical data sets on RBE effects in patients, and applied clinical strategies to manage RBE uncertainties. A better understanding of the variability in RBE would allow development of proton treatments which are safer and more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brita S Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Experimental Clinical Oncology - Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden; Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian P Karger
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium Dresden and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine C.G. Carus, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine C.G. Carus Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marco Schwarz
- Protontherapy Department -Trento Hospital, and TIFPA-INFN, Trento, Italy
| | - Tracy S A Underwood
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Dirk Wagenaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gillian A Whitfield
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, UK
| | - Armin Lühr
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Friedrich T, Pfuhl T, Scholz M. Update of the particle irradiation data ensemble (PIDE) for cell survival. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:645-655. [PMID: 33912970 PMCID: PMC8273790 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The particle irradiation data ensemble (PIDE) is the largest database of cell survival data measured after exposure to ion beams and photon reference radiation. We report here on the updated version of the PIDE database and demonstrate how to investigate generic properties of radiation dose response using these sets of raw data. The database now contains information of over 1100 pairs of photon and ion dose response curves. It provides the originally published raw data of cell survival in addition to given linear quadratic (LQ) model parameters. If available, the raw data were used to derive LQ model parameters in the same way for all experiments. To demonstrate the extent of the database and the variability among experiments we focus on the dose response curves after ion and photon radiation separately in a first step. Furthermore, we discuss the capability and the limitations of the database for analyzing properties of low and high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation response based on multiple experiments. PIDE is freely available to the research community under www.gsi.de/bio-pide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Friedrich
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Tabea Pfuhl
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Institut für Festkörperphysik, TU Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
First theoretical determination of relative biological effectiveness of very high energy electrons. Sci Rep 2021; 11:11242. [PMID: 34045625 PMCID: PMC8160353 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90805-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Very high energy electrons (VHEEs, E > 70 MeV) present promising clinical advantages over conventional beams due to their increased range, improved penumbra and relative insensitivity to tissue heterogeneities. They have recently garnered additional interest in their application to spatially fractionated radiotherapy or ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) therapy. However, the lack of radiobiological data limits their rapid development. This study aims to provide numerical biologically-relevant information by characterizing VHEE beams (100 and 300 MeV) against better-known beams (clinical energy electrons, photons, protons, carbon and neon ions). Their macro- and microdosimetric properties were compared, using the dose-averaged linear energy transfer ([Formula: see text]) as the macroscopic metric, and the dose-mean lineal energy [Formula: see text] and the dose-weighted lineal energy distribution, yd(y), as microscopic metrics. Finally, the modified microdosimetric kinetic model was used to calculate the respective cell survival curves and the theoretical RBE. From the macrodosimetric point of view, VHEEs presented a potential improved biological efficacy over clinical photon/electron beams due to their increased [Formula: see text]. The microdosimetric data, however, suggests no increased biological efficacy of VHEEs over clinical electron beams, resulting in RBE values of approximately 1, giving confidence to their clinical implementation. This study represents a first step to complement further radiobiological experiments.
Collapse
|
22
|
Coleman CN, Buchsbaum JC, Prasanna PGS, Capala J, Obcemea C, Espey MG, Ahmed MM, Hong JA, Vikram B. Moving Forward in the Next Decade: Radiation Oncology Sciences for Patient-Centered Cancer Care. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab046. [PMID: 34350377 PMCID: PMC8328099 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In a time of rapid advances in science and technology, the opportunities for radiation oncology are undergoing transformational change. The linkage between and understanding of the physical dose and induced biological perturbations are opening entirely new areas of application. The ability to define anatomic extent of disease and the elucidation of the biology of metastases has brought a key role for radiation oncology for treating metastatic disease. That radiation can stimulate and suppress subpopulations of the immune response makes radiation a key participant in cancer immunotherapy. Targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy delivers radiation systemically with radionuclides and carrier molecules selected for their physical, chemical, and biochemical properties. Radiation oncology usage of “big data” and machine learning and artificial intelligence adds the opportunity to markedly change the workflow for clinical practice while physically targeting and adapting radiation fields in real time. Future precision targeting requires multidimensional understanding of the imaging, underlying biology, and anatomical relationship among tissues for radiation as spatial and temporal “focused biology.” Other means of energy delivery are available as are agents that can be activated by radiation with increasing ability to target treatments. With broad applicability of radiation in cancer treatment, radiation therapy is a necessity for effective cancer care, opening a career path for global health serving the medically underserved in geographically isolated populations as a substantial societal contribution addressing health disparities. Understanding risk and mitigation of radiation injury make it an important discipline for and beyond cancer care including energy policy, space exploration, national security, and global partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Norman Coleman
- Correspondence to: C. Norman Coleman, MD, Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9727, Bethesda, MD 20892-9727, USA (e-mail: )
| | - Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pataje G S Prasanna
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jacek Capala
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ceferino Obcemea
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael G Espey
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mansoor M Ahmed
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Julie A Hong
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bauer J, Bahn E, Harrabi S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Alber M. How can scanned proton beam treatment planning for low-grade glioma cope with increased distal RBE and locally increased radiosensitivity for late MR-detected brain lesions? Med Phys 2021; 48:1497-1507. [PMID: 33506555 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
A novel risk model has recently been proposed for the occurrence of late contrast-enhancing brain lesions (CEBLs) after proton irradiation of low-grade glioma (LGG) patients. It predicts a strong dependence on dose-weighted linear-energy transfer (LETd effect) and an increased radiosensitivity of the ventricular proximity, a 4-mm fringe surrounding the ventricular system (VP4mm effect). On this basis, we investigated (A) how these two risk factors and patient-specific anatomical and treatment plan (TP) features contribute to normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and (B) if conventional LETd -reduction techniques like multiple-field TP are able to reduce NTCP. (A) The LGG model cohort (N = 110) was stratified with respect to prescribed dose, tumor grade, and treatment field configuration. NTCP predictions and CEBL occurrence rates per strata were analyzed. (B) The effect of multiple-field TP was investigated in two patient groups: (i) nine high-risk subjects with extended lateral target volumes who had developed CEBLs after single-beam treatments were retrospectively replanned with a clinical standard two-field setting using almost orthogonal fields and strictly opposing fields, (ii) single-field treatments were simulated for seven low-risk patients with small central target volumes clinically treated with two strictly opposing fields. (A) In the model cohort, we identified the exposure of the radiosensitive VP4mm fringe with proton field components of increased biological effectiveness as dominant NTCP driving factor. We observed that larger target volumes and location lateral to the main ventricles, both being characteristic for WHO°II tumors, presented with the highest complication risks. Among subjects of an equal dose prescription of 54 Gy(RBE), the highest median NTCP was obtained for the WHO°II group treated with two fields using sharp angles. (B) Regarding the effect of multiple-field plans, we found that an NTCP reduction was only achievable in the low-risk group where the LETd effect dominates and the VP4mm effect is small. NTCP of the single-field plans was 23% higher compared to the clinical opposing field plan. In the high-risk group, where the VP4mm effect dominates the risk, both two-field scenarios yielded 44% higher NTCP predictions compared to the clinical single-field plans. The interplay of an increased radiosensitivity in the VP4mm fringe with proton field components of increased biological effectiveness creates a geometric complexity that can hardly be managed by current clinical TP. Our results underline that advanced biologically guided TP approaches become crucial for an effective risk minimization in proton therapy of LGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emanuel Bahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Alber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kirkby KJ, Kirkby NF, Burnet NG, Owen H, Mackay RI, Crellin A, Green S. Heavy charged particle beam therapy and related new radiotherapy technologies: The clinical potential, physics and technical developments required to deliver benefit for patients with cancer. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200247. [PMID: 33021102 PMCID: PMC7715999 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
In the UK, one in two people will develop cancer during their lifetimes and radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in effective treatment. High energy proton beam therapy commenced in the UK National Health Service in 2018. Heavier charged particles have potential advantages over protons by delivering more dose in the Bragg peak, with a sharper penumbra, lower oxygen dependence and increased biological effectiveness. However, they also require more costly equipment including larger gantries to deliver the treatment. There are significant uncertainties in the modelling of relative biological effectiveness and the effects of the fragmentation tail which can deliver dose beyond the Bragg peak. These effects need to be carefully considered especially in relation to long-term outcomes.In 2019, a group of clinicians, clinical scientists, engineers, physical and life scientists from academia and industry, together with funding agency stakeholders, met to consider how the UK should address new technologies for RT, especially the use of heavier charged particles such as helium and carbon and new modes of delivery such as FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT).There was unanimous agreement that the UK should develop a facility for heavier charged particle therapy, perhaps constituting a new National Ion Research Centre to enable research using protons and heavier charged particles. Discussion followed on the scale and features, including which ions should be included, from protons through helium, boron, and lithium to carbon, and even oxygen. The consensus view was that any facility intended to treat patients must be located in a hospital setting while providing dedicated research space for physics, preclinical biology and clinical research with beam lines designed for both in vitro and in vivo research. The facility should to be able to investigate and deliver both ultra-high dose rate FLASH RT and SFRT (GRID, minibeams etc.). Discussion included a number of accelerator design options and whether gantries were required. Other potential collaborations might be exploited, including with space agencies, electronics and global communications industries and the nuclear industry.In preparation for clinical delivery, there may be opportunities to send patients overseas (for 12C or 4He ion therapy) using the model of the National Health Service (NHS) Proton Overseas Programme and to look at potential national clinical trials which include heavier ions, FLASH or SFRT. This could be accomplished under the auspices of NCRI CTRad (National Cancer Research Institute, Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group).The initiative should be a community approach, involving all interested parties with a vision that combines discovery science, a translational research capability and a clinical treatment facility. Barriers to the project and ways to overcome them were discussed. Finally, a set of different scenarios of features with different costs and timelines was constructed, with consideration given to the funding environment (prer-Covid-19) and need for cross-funder collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Hywel Owen
- University of Manchester/Cockcroft Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Stuart Green
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Silicon 3D Microdetectors for Microdosimetry in Hadron Therapy. MICROMACHINES 2020; 11:mi11121053. [PMID: 33260634 PMCID: PMC7760635 DOI: 10.3390/mi11121053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The present overview describes the evolution of new microdosimeters developed in the National Microelectronics Center in Spain (IMB-CNM, CSIC), ranging from the first ultra-thin 3D diodes (U3DTHINs) to the advanced 3D-cylindrical microdetectors, which have been developed over the last 10 years. In this work, we summarize the design, main manufacture processes, and electrical characterization of these devices. These sensors were specifically customized for use in particle therapy and overcame some of the technological challenges in this domain, namely the low noise capability, well-defined sensitive volume, high spatial resolution, and pile-up robustness. Likewise, both architectures reduce the loss of charge carriers due to trapping effects, the charge collection time, and the voltage required for full depletion compared to planar silicon detectors. In particular, a 3D‒cylindrical architecture with electrodes inserted into the silicon bulk and with a very well‒delimited sensitive volume (SV) mimicked a cell array with shapes and sizes similar to those of mammalian cells for the first time. Experimental tests of the carbon beamlines at the Grand Accélérateur National d’Lourds (GANIL, France) and Centro Nazionale Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO, Italy) showed the feasibility of the U3DTHINs in hadron therapy beams and the good performance of the 3D‒cylindrical microdetectors for assessing linear energy distributions of clinical beams, with clinical fluence rates of 5 × 107 s−1cm−2 without saturation. The dose-averaged lineal energies showed a generally good agreement with Monte Carlo simulations. The results indicated that these devices can be used to characterize the microdosimetric properties in hadron therapy, even though the charge collection efficiency (CCE) and electronic noise may pose limitations on their performance, which is studied and discussed herein. In the last 3D‒cylindrical microdetector generation, we considerably improved the CCE due to the microfabrication enhancements, which have led to shallower and steeper dopant profiles. We also summarize the successive microdosimetric characterizations performed with both devices in proton and carbon beamlines.
Collapse
|
26
|
Jones B. Clinical Radiobiology of Fast Neutron Therapy: What Was Learnt? Front Oncol 2020; 10:1537. [PMID: 33042798 PMCID: PMC7522468 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Neutron therapy was developed from neutron radiobiology experiments, and had identified a higher cell kill per unit dose and an accompanying reduction in oxygen dependency. But experts such as Hal Gray were sceptical about clinical applications, for good reasons. Gray knew that the increase in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) with dose fall-off could produce marked clinical limitations. After many years of research, this treatment did not produce the expected gains in tumour control relative to normal tissue toxicity, as predicted by Gray. More detailed reasons for this are discussed in this paper. Neutrons do not have Bragg peaks and so did not selectively spare many tissues from radiation exposure; the constant neutron RBE tumour prescription values did not represent the probable higher RBE values in late-reacting tissues with low α/β values; the inevitable increase in RBE as dose falls along a beam would also contribute to greater toxicity than in a similar megavoltage photon beam. Some tissues such as the central nervous system white matter had the highest RBEs partly because of the higher percentage hydrogen content in lipid-containing molecules. All the above factors contributed to disappointing clinical results found in a series of randomised controlled studies at many treatment centres, although at the time they were performed, neutron therapy was in a catch-up phase with photon-based treatments. Their findings are summarised along with their technical aspects and fractionation choices. Better understanding of fast neutron experiments and therapy has been gained through relatively simple mathematical models—using the biological effective dose concept and incorporating the RBEmax and RBEmin parameters (the limits of RBE at low and high dose, respectively—as shown in the Appendix). The RBE itself can then vary between these limits according to the dose per fraction used. These approaches provide useful insights into the problems that can occur in proton and ion beam therapy and how they may be optimised. This is because neutron ionisations in living tissues are mainly caused by recoil protons of energy proportional to the neutron energy: these are close to the proton energies that occur close to the Bragg peak region. To some extent, neutron RBE studies contain the highest RBE ranges found within proton and ion beams near Bragg peaks. In retrospect, neutrons were a useful radiobiological tool that has continued to inform the scientific and clinical community about the essential radiobiological principles of all forms of high linear energy transfer therapy. Neutron radiobiology and its implications should be taught on training courses and studied closely by clinicians, physicists, and biologists engaged in particle beam therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bleddyn Jones
- Gray Laboratory, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,University College Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Preparation of a radiobiology beam line at the 18 MeV proton cyclotron facility at CNA. Phys Med 2020; 74:19-29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
28
|
Mara E, Clausen M, Khachonkham S, Deycmar S, Pessy C, Dörr W, Kuess P, Georg D, Gruber S. Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LET d on relative biological effectiveness in scanned proton beams: An in vitro study based on human cell lines. Med Phys 2020; 47:3691-3702. [PMID: 32347564 PMCID: PMC7496287 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is commonly used in clinical proton therapy, irrespective of tissue type and depth. This in vitro study was conducted to quantify the RBE of scanned protons as a function of the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd ) and the sensitivity factor (α/ß)X . Additionally, three phenomenological models (McNamara, Rørvik, and Jones) and one mechanistic model (repair-misrepair-fixation, RMF) were applied to the experimentally derived data. METHODS Four human cell lines (FaDu, HaCat, Du145, SKMel) with differential (α/ß)X ratios were irradiated in a custom-designed irradiation setup with doses between 0 and 6 Gy at proximal, central, and distal positions of a 80 mm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) centered at 80 mm (setup A: proton energies 66.5-135.6 MeV) and 155 mm (setup B: proton energies 127.2-185.9 MeV) depth, respectively. LETd values at the respective cell positions were derived from Monte Carlo simulations performed with the treatment planning system (TPS, RayStation). Dosimetric measurements were conducted to verify dose homogeneity and dose delivery accuracy. RBE values were derived for doses that resulted in 90 % (RBE90 ) and 10 % (RBE10 ) of cell survival, and survival after a 0.5 Gy dose (RBE0.5Gy ), 2 Gy dose (RBE2Gy ), and 6 Gy dose (RBE6Gy ). RESULTS LETd values at sample positions were 1.9, 2.1, 2.5, 2.8, 4.1, and 4.5 keV/µm. For the cell lines with high (α/ß)X ratios (FaDu, HaCat), the LETd did not impact on the RBE. For low (α/ß)X cell lines (Du145, SKMel), LQ-derived survival curves indicated a clear correlation of LETd and RBE. RBE90 values up to 2.9 and RBE10 values between 1.4 and 1.8 were obtained. Model-derived RBE predictions slightly overestimated the RBE for the high (α/ß)X cell lines, although all models except the Jones model provided RBE values within the experimental uncertainty. For low (α/ß)X cell lines, no agreement was found between experiments and model predictions, that is, all models underestimated the measured RBE. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity parameter (α/ß)X was observed to be a major influencing factor for the RBE of protons and its sensitivity toward LETd changes. RBE prediction models are applicable for high (α/ß)X cell lines but do not estimate RBE values with sufficient accuracy in low (α/ß)X cell lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Mara
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,University of Applied Science, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Monika Clausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Suphalak Khachonkham
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Radiation Therapy, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Simon Deycmar
- Laboratory of Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Clara Pessy
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Dörr
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Kuess
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Sylvia Gruber
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Scholz M. State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects of Ion Beam Therapy: Physical and Radiobiological Aspects. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2935240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
30
|
Raturi VP, Tochinai T, Hojo H, Rachi T, Hotta K, Nakamura N, Zenda S, Motegi A, Ariji T, Hirano Y, Baba H, Ohyoshi H, Nakamura M, Okumura M, Bei Y, Akimoto T. Dose-Volume and Radiobiological Model-Based Comparative Evaluation of the Gastrointestinal Toxicity Risk of Photon and Proton Irradiation Plans in Localized Pancreatic Cancer Without Distant Metastasis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:517061. [PMID: 33194580 PMCID: PMC7645056 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.517061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiobiological model-based studies of photon-modulated radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer have reported reduced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, although the risk is still high. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of 3D-passive scattering proton beam therapy (3D-PSPBT) in limiting GI organ at risk (OAR) toxicity in localized pancreatic cancer based on dosimetric data and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. Methods: The data of 24 pancreatic cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed, and these patients were planned with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and 3D-PSPBT. The tumor was targeted without elective nodal coverage. All generated plans consisted of a 50.4-GyE (Gray equivalent) dose in 28 fractions with equivalent OAR constraints, and they were normalized to cover 50% of the planning treatment volume (PTV) with 100% of the prescription dose. Physical dose distributions were evaluated. GI-OAR toxicity risk for different endpoints was estimated by using published NTCP Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) models. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the dosimetric data, and ΔNTCPIMRT-PSPBT and ΔNTCPVMAT-PSPBT were also computed. Results: Similar homogeneity and conformity for the clinical target volume (CTV) and PTV were exhibited by all three planning techniques (P > 0.05). 3D-PSPBT resulted in a significant dose reduction for GI-OARs in both the low-intermediate dose range (below 30 GyE) and the highest dose region (D max and V 50 GyE) in comparison with IMRT and VMAT (P < 0.05). Based on the NTCP evaluation, the NTCP reduction for GI-OARs by 3D-PSPBT was minimal in comparison with IMRT and VMAT. Conclusion: 3D-PSPBT results in minimal NTCP reduction and has less potential to substantially reduce the toxicity risk of upper GI bleeding, ulceration, obstruction, and perforation endpoints compared to IMRT and VMAT. 3D-PSPBT may have the potential to reduce acute dose-limiting toxicity in the form of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea by reducing the GI-OAR treated volume in the low-to-intermediate dose range. However, this result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay P. Raturi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
- *Correspondence: Vijay P. Raturi
| | - Taku Tochinai
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Hojo
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toshiya Rachi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Hotta
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sadamoto Zenda
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takaki Ariji
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hirano
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiromi Baba
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hajime Ohyoshi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Okumura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yanping Bei
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rabus H, Ngcezu SA, Braunroth T, Nettelbeck H. “Broadscale” nanodosimetry: Nanodosimetric track structure quantities increase at distal edge of spread-out proton Bragg peaks. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
32
|
Sørensen BS. Commentary: RBE in proton therapy - where is the experimental in vivo data? Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1337-1339. [PMID: 31578911 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1669819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brita Singers Sørensen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology and Danish Center for Particle Therapy, DCPT, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jones B, Hopewell J. Spinal cord re-treatments using photon and proton based radiotherapy: LQ-derived tolerance doses. Phys Med 2019; 64:304-310. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
34
|
Carrier F, Liao Y, Mendenhall N, Guerrieri P, Todor D, Ahmad A, Dominello M, Joiner MC, Burmeister J. Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) Special Debate: I would treat prostate cancer with proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:7-14. [PMID: 31166085 PMCID: PMC6612688 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- France Carrier
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Yixiang Liao
- Department of Radiation OncologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoILUSA
| | | | | | - Dorin Todor
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVAUSA
| | - Anis Ahmad
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of MedicineMiamiFLUSA
| | - Michael Dominello
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Konings K, Vandevoorde C, Belmans N, Vermeesen R, Baselet B, Walleghem MV, Janssen A, Isebaert S, Baatout S, Haustermans K, Moreels M. The Combination of Particle Irradiation With the Hedgehog Inhibitor GANT61 Differently Modulates the Radiosensitivity and Migration of Cancer Cells Compared to X-Ray Irradiation. Front Oncol 2019; 9:391. [PMID: 31139573 PMCID: PMC6527843 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the advantages of charged particles compared to conventional radiotherapy, a vast increase is noted in the use of particle therapy in the clinic. These advantages include an improved dose deposition and increased biological effectiveness. Metastasis is still an important cause of mortality in cancer patients and evidence has shown that conventional radiotherapy can increase the formation of metastasizing cells. An important pathway involved in the process of metastasis is the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway. Recent studies have demonstrated that activation of the Hh pathway, in response to X-rays, can lead to radioresistance and increased migratory, and invasive capabilities of cancer cells. Here, we investigated the effect of X-rays, protons, and carbon ions on cell survival, migration, and Hh pathway gene expression in prostate cancer (PC3) and medulloblastoma (DAOY) cell lines. In addition, the potential modulation of cell survival and migration by the Hh pathway inhibitor GANT61 was investigated. We found that in both cell lines, carbon ions were more effective in decreasing cell survival and migration as well as inducing more significant alterations in the Hh pathway genes compared to X-rays or protons. In addition, we show here for the first time that the Hh inhibitor GANT61 is able to sensitize DAOY medulloblastoma cells to particle radiation (proton and carbon ion) but not to conventional X-rays. This important finding demonstrates that the results of combination treatment strategies with X-ray radiotherapy cannot be automatically extrapolated to particle therapy and should be investigated separately. In conclusion, combining GANT61 with particle radiation could offer a benefit for specific cancer types with regard to cancer cell survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrien Konings
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium.,Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Niels Belmans
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium.,Laboratory of Morphology, Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Randy Vermeesen
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium
| | - Bjorn Baselet
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium
| | - Merel Van Walleghem
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium
| | - Ann Janssen
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sarah Baatout
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marjan Moreels
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Mol, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Grzanka L, Waligórski MPR, Bassler N. THE ROLE OF PARTICLE SPECTRA IN MODELING THE RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTON RADIOTHERAPY BEAMS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2019; 183:251-254. [PMID: 30566667 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncy268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy beams of protons or heavier ions generate secondary particles through nuclear interactions over different patient tissues. The resulting particle spectra depend on the tissue composition and on charge and energy of the primary beam ions. In proton radiotherapy, predictive radiobiological models usually apply dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET). Microdosimetry-based models for proton or heavier ion primary beams also rely on dose-averaged quantities, the values of which depend on whether the produced secondaries are included or excluded in the calculation. In turn, this will affect the results of calculations of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of these beams. In this brief note, we study quantitatively the influence of the secondary radiation spectra on the averaged expectation values of LET and their impact on predictions of RBE. It is noted that for microdosimetry-based quantities and for corresponding LET-based parameters the trends are similar and that fluence-averaged quantities should be studied more closely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leszek Grzanka
- Proton Radiotherapy Group, Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, ul. Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, Poland
| | - Michael P R Waligórski
- Proton Radiotherapy Group, Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, ul. Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, Poland
| | - Niels Bassler
- Medical Radiation Physics, Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zhou C, Jones B, Moustafa M, Yang B, Brons S, Cao L, Dai Y, Schwager C, Chen M, Jaekel O, Chen L, Debus J, Abdollahi A. Determining RBE for development of lung fibrosis induced by fractionated irradiation with carbon ions utilizing fibrosis index and high-LET BED model. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:25-32. [PMID: 30511024 PMCID: PMC6257927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) with raster scanning technology is a promising treatment for lung cancer and thoracic malignancies. Determining normal tissue tolerance of organs at risk is of utmost importance for the success of CIRT. Here we report the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of CIRT as a function of dose and fractionation for development of pulmonary fibrosis using well established fibrosis index (FI) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dose series of fractionated clinical quality CIRT versus conventional photon irradiation to the whole thorax were compared in C57BL6 mice. Quantitative assessment of pulmonary fibrosis was performed by applying the FI to computed tomography (CT) data acquired 24-weeks post irradiation. RBE was calculated as the ratio of photon to CIRT dose required for the same level of FI. Further RBE predictions were performed using the derived equation from high-linear energy transfer biologically effective dose (high-LET BED) model. RESULTS The averaged lung fibrosis RBE of 5-fraction CIRT schedule was determined as 2.75 ± 0.55. The RBE estimate at the half maximum effective dose (RBEED50) was estimated at 2.82 for clinically relevant fractional sizes of 1-6 Gy. At the same dose range, an RBE value of 2.81 ± 0.40 was predicted by the high-LET BED model. The converted biologically effective dose (BED) of CIRT for induction of half maximum FI (BEDED50) was identified to be 58.12 Gy3.95. In accordance, an estimated RBE of 2.88 was obtained at the BEDED50 level. The LQ model radiosensitivity parameters for 5-fraction was obtained as αH = 0.3030 ± 0.0037 Gy-1 and βH = 0.0056 ± 0.0007 Gy-2. CONCLUSION This is the first report of RBE estimation for CIRT with the endpoint of pulmonary fibrosis in-vivo. We proposed in present study a novel way to mathematically modeling RBE by integrating RBEmax and α/βL based on conventional high-LET BED conception. This model well predicted RBE in the clinically relevant dose range but is sensitive to the uncertainties of α/β estimates from the reference photon irradiation (α/βL). These findings will assist to eliminate current uncertainties in prediction of CIRT induced normal tissue complications and builds a solid foundation for development of more accurate in-vivo data driven RBE estimates.
Collapse
Key Words
- BED, biologically effective dose
- Biologically effective dose (BED)
- CPFE, combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome
- CT, computed tomography
- Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT)
- FI, fibrosis index
- Fractionation
- HU, Hounsfield unit
- High-linear energy transfer (high-LET)
- LET, linear energy transfer
- LQ model, linear quadratic model
- Lung fibrosis
- NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer
- Normal tissue response
- PMMA, Polymethylmethacrylat
- RBE, relative biological effectiveness
- RILF, Radiation-induced lung fibrosis
- RP, radiation pneumonitis
- Relative biological effectiveness (RBE)
- SBRT or SABR, hypofractionated stereotactic body or ablative radiation therapy
- V5, volume of lung receiving ≥5 Gy (RBE)
- α/β, alpha/beta ratio
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Corresponding authors at: Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), INF 460, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
| | - Bleddyn Jones
- Gray Laboratory, CRUK/MRC Oxford Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mahmoud Moustafa
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Bing Yang
- Physics Institute University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Liji Cao
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ying Dai
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Oncology, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Christian Schwager
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ming Chen
- Zhejiang Key Lab of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Oliver Jaekel
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division for Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Longhua Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juergen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Corresponding authors at: Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), INF 460, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Radiation tolerance of the optic pathway in patients treated with proton and photon radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:112-119. [PMID: 30773177 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a complication of radiation therapy (RT) that causes blindness. We aimed to define the tolerance of the anterior optic pathway to fractionated RT and identify risk factors for RION. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base treated with proton and photon therapy between 1983 and 2013, who received a minimum of 30 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness [RBE]) to the anterior optic pathway were assessed. Optic neuropathy with radiographic correlation occurring ≥6 months after completion of RT in the absence of tumor recurrence or other probable cause was diagnosed as RION. RESULTS Of 514 patients, 17 developed RION. With median follow-up of 4.8 years, cumulative incidence of RION was 1% among patients receiving <59 Gy (RBE) and 5.8% among patients receiving ≥60 Gy (RBE) to the optic pathway. Higher maximum point dose to the optic pathway (subhazard ratio [SHR] = 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.2, p = 0.001), older age (SHR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, p < 0.0005), and female sex (SHR = 16.3, 95% CI 2.2-122.4, p = 0.007) were statistically significant risk factors for RION in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION In our study cohort, rates of RION were very low with conventionally fractionated RT up to 59 Gy. At doses ≥60 Gy, there is an increased risk of RION, with greater risk for women and older patients.
Collapse
|
39
|
Szabó ER, Reisz Z, Polanek R, Tőkés T, Czifrus S, Pesznyák C, Biró B, Fenyvesi A, Király B, Molnár J, Brunner S, Daroczi B, Varga Z, Hideghéty K. A novel vertebrate system for the examination and direct comparison of the relative biological effectiveness for different radiation qualities and sources. Int J Radiat Biol 2018; 94:985-995. [PMID: 30332320 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1511928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The recent rapid increase of hadron therapy applications requires the development of high performance, reliable in vivo models for preclinical research on the biological effects of high linear energy transfer (LET) particle radiation. AIM The aim of this paper was to test the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the zebrafish embryo system at two neutron facilities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Series of viable zebrafish embryos at 24-hour post-fertilization (hpf) were exposed to single fraction, whole-body, photon and neutron (reactor fission neutrons (<En = 1 MeV>) and (p (18 MeV)+Be, <En> = 3.5 MeV) fast neutron) irradiation. The survival and morphologic abnormalities of each embryo were assessed at 24-hour intervals from the point of fertilization up to 192 hpf and then compared to conventional 6 MV photon beam irradiation results. RESULTS The higher energy of the fast neutron beams represents lower RBE (ref. source LINAC 6 MV photon). The lethality rate in the zebrafish embryo model was 10 times higher for 1 MeV fission neutrons and 2.5 times greater for p (18 MeV)+Be cyclotron generated fast neutron beam when compared to photon irradiation results. Dose-dependent organ perturbations (shortening of the body length, spine curvature, microcephaly, micro-ophthalmia, pericardial edema and inhibition of yolk sac resorption) and microscopic (marked cellular changes in eyes, brain, liver, muscle and the gastrointestinal system) changes scale together with the dose response. CONCLUSION The zebrafish embryo system is a powerful and versatile model for assessing the effect of ionizing radiation with different LET values on viability, organ and tissue development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Szabó
- a Extreme Light Infrastructure - Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-HU Non-Profit Ltd , Szeged , Hungary
| | - Z Reisz
- b Department of Pathology , University of Szeged , Szeged , Hungary
| | - R Polanek
- a Extreme Light Infrastructure - Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-HU Non-Profit Ltd , Szeged , Hungary
| | - T Tőkés
- a Extreme Light Infrastructure - Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-HU Non-Profit Ltd , Szeged , Hungary
| | - Sz Czifrus
- c Budapest University of Technology and Economics Institute of Nuclear Techniques , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Cs Pesznyák
- c Budapest University of Technology and Economics Institute of Nuclear Techniques , Budapest , Hungary
| | - B Biró
- d Hungarian Academy of Sciences Institute for Nuclear Research (MTA Atomki) , Debrecen , Hungary
| | - A Fenyvesi
- d Hungarian Academy of Sciences Institute for Nuclear Research (MTA Atomki) , Debrecen , Hungary
| | - B Király
- d Hungarian Academy of Sciences Institute for Nuclear Research (MTA Atomki) , Debrecen , Hungary
| | - J Molnár
- d Hungarian Academy of Sciences Institute for Nuclear Research (MTA Atomki) , Debrecen , Hungary
| | - Sz Brunner
- a Extreme Light Infrastructure - Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-HU Non-Profit Ltd , Szeged , Hungary
| | - B Daroczi
- e Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics , University of Debrecen , Debrecen , Hungary
| | - Z Varga
- f Department of Oncotherapy , University of Szeged , Szeged , Hungary
| | - K Hideghéty
- a Extreme Light Infrastructure - Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-HU Non-Profit Ltd , Szeged , Hungary.,f Department of Oncotherapy , University of Szeged , Szeged , Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Beyreuther E, Baumann M, Enghardt W, Helmbrecht S, Karsch L, Krause M, Pawelke J, Schreiner L, Schürer M, von Neubeck C, Lühr A. Research Facility for Radiobiological Studies at the University Proton Therapy Dresden. Int J Part Ther 2018; 5:172-182. [PMID: 31773028 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00008.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In order to take full advantage of proton radiotherapy, the biological effect of protons in normal and tumor tissue should be investigated and understood in detail. The ongoing discussion on variable relative biological effectiveness along the proton depth dose distribution (eg, Paganetti 2015), and also the administration of concomitant treatments, demands dedicated in vitro trials that prepare the translation into the clinics. Therefore, a setup for radiobiological studies and the corresponding dosimetry should be established that enables in vitro experiments at a horizontal proton beam and a clinical 6 MV photon linear accelerator (Linac) as reference. Methods The experimental proton beam at the University Proton Therapy Dresden is characterized by high beam availability and reliability throughout the day in parallel to patient treatment. For cell irradiation, a homogeneous 10 × 10 cm2 proton field with an optional spread-out Bragg-peak can be formed. A water-filled phantom was installed that allows for precise positioning of different sample geometries along the proton path. Results Depth-dose profiles within the phantom and dose homogeneity over different cell samples were characterized for the proton beam and the photon reference source. A daily quality assurance protocol was implemented that provides absolute dose information required for significant and reproducible in vitro experiments. Cell survival test experiments were performed to demonstrate the feasibility of such experiments. Conclusion In the experimental room of the University Proton Therapy Dresden, clinically relevant conditions for proton in vitro experiments have been realized. The established cell phantom and dosimetry facilitate irradiation in an aqueous environment and are transferable to other proton, photon and ion beam facilities. Precise positioning and easy exchange of cell samples, monitor unit-based dose delivery, and high beam availability allow for systematic in vitro experiments. The close vicinity to the radiotherapy and radiobiology departments provides access to clinical linacs and the interdisciplinary basis for further translational steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Enghardt
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Helmbrecht
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Leonhard Karsch
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), partner site Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lena Schreiner
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Schürer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), partner site Dresden, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Grzanka L, Ardenfors O, Bassler N. MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS OF SPATIAL LET DISTRIBUTIONS IN CLINICAL PROTON BEAMS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2018; 180:296-299. [PMID: 29378068 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The linear energy transfer (LET) is commonly used as a parameter which describes the quality of the radiation applied in radiation therapy with fast ions. In particular in proton therapy, most models which predict the radiobiological properties of the applied beam, are fitted to the dose-averaged LET, LETd. The related parameter called the fluence- or track-averaged LET, LETt, is less frequently used. Both LETt and in particular LETd depends profoundly on the encountered secondary particle spectrum. For proton beams including all secondary particles, LETd may reach more than 3 keV/um in the entry channel of the proton field. However, typically the charged particle spectrum is only averaged over the primary and secondary protons, which is in the order of 0.5 keV/um for the same region. This is equal to assuming that the secondary particle spectrum from heavier ions is irrelevant for the resulting radiobiology, which is an assertion in the need of closer investigation. Models which rely on LETd should also be clear on what type of LETd is used, which is not always the case. Within this work, we have extended the Monte Carlo particle transport code SHIELD-HIT12A to provide dose- and track-average LET-maps for ion radiation therapy treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leszek Grzanka
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAS, ul. Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oscar Ardenfors
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Niels Bassler
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Underwood TS, McMahon SJ. Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE): a multiscale problem. Br J Radiol 2018; 92:20180004. [PMID: 29975153 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy is undergoing rapid expansion both within the UK and internationally, but significant challenges still need to be overcome if maximum benefit is to be realised from this technique. One major limitation is the persistent uncertainty in proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE). While RBE values are needed to link proton radiotherapy to our existing experience with photon radiotherapy, RBE remains poorly understood and is typically incorporated as a constant dose scaling factor of 1.1 in clinical plans. This is in contrast to extensive experimental evidence indicating that RBE is a function of dose, tissue type, and proton linear energy transfer, among other parameters. In this article, we discuss the challenges associated with obtaining clinically relevant values for proton RBE through commonly-used assays, and highlight the wide range of other experimental end points which can inform our understanding of RBE. We propose that accurate and robust optimization of proton radiotherapy ultimately requires a multiscale understanding of RBE, integrating subcellular, cellular, and patient-level processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Sa Underwood
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lühr A, von Neubeck C, Pawelke J, Seidlitz A, Peitzsch C, Bentzen SM, Bortfeld T, Debus J, Deutsch E, Langendijk JA, Loeffler JS, Mohan R, Scholz M, Sørensen BS, Weber DC, Baumann M, Krause M. "Radiobiology of Proton Therapy": Results of an international expert workshop. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:56-67. [PMID: 29861141 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The physical properties of proton beams offer the potential to reduce toxicity in tumor-adjacent normal tissues. Toward this end, the number of proton radiotherapy facilities has steeply increased over the last 10-15 years to currently around 70 operational centers worldwide. However, taking full advantage of the opportunities offered by proton radiation for clinical radiotherapy requires a better understanding of the radiobiological effects of protons alone or combined with drugs or immunotherapy on normal tissues and tumors. This report summarizes the main results of the international expert workshop "Radiobiology of Proton Therapy" that was held in November 2016 in Dresden. It addresses the major topics (1) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton beam therapy, (2) interaction of proton radiobiology with radiation physics in current treatment planning, (3) biological effects in proton therapy combined with systemic treatments, and (4) testing biological effects of protons in clinical trials. Finally, important research avenues for improvement of proton radiotherapy based on radiobiological knowledge are identified. The clinical distribution of radiobiological effectiveness of protons alone or in combination with systemic chemo- or immunotherapies as well as patient stratification based on biomarker expressions are key to reach the full potential of proton beam therapy. Dedicated preclinical experiments, innovative clinical trial designs, and large high-quality data repositories will be most important to achieve this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Lühr
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Seidlitz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Claudia Peitzsch
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health and the Maryland Proton Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Physics Division, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Heidelberg German Consortium for Translational Oncology (DKTK), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INSERM, 1030 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Medecine du Kremlin Bicetre Paris Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jay S Loeffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Michael Scholz
- GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Department of Biophysics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Brita S Sørensen
- Dept. Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Michael Baumann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Saager M, Peschke P, Brons S, Debus J, Karger CP. Determination of the proton RBE in the rat spinal cord: Is there an increase towards the end of the spread-out Bragg peak? Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:115-120. [PMID: 29573823 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons in the rat spinal cord as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS The rat cervical spinal cord was irradiated with single or two equal fractions (split doses) of protons at four positions (LET 1.4-5.5 keV/µm) along a 6 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). From dose-response analysis, TD50- (dose at 50% effect probability) and RBE-values were derived using the endpoint of radiation-induced myelopathy. RESULTS Along the SOBP, the TD50-values decreased from 21.7 ± 0.3 Gy to 19.5 ± 0.5 Gy for single and from 32.3 ± 0.3 Gy to 27.9 ± 0.5 Gy for split doses. The corresponding RBE-values increased from 1.13 ± 0.04 to 1.26 ± 0.05 (single doses) and from 1.06 ± 0.02 to 1.23 ± 0.03 (split doses). CONCLUSIONS For the relative high fractional doses, the experimental RBE at the distal edge of the proton SOBP is moderately increased. The conventionally applied RBE of 1.1 appears to be valid for the mid-SOBP region, but the higher values occurring more distally could be of clinical significance, especially if critical structures are located in this area. Further in vivo studies at lower fractional doses are urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saager
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Peschke
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Howard ME, Beltran C, Anderson S, Tseung WC, Sarkaria JN, Herman MG. Investigating Dependencies of Relative Biological Effectiveness for Proton Therapy in Cancer Cells. Int J Part Ther 2018; 4:12-22. [PMID: 30159358 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-17-00031.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) accounts for the differences in biological effect from different radiation types. The RBE for proton therapy remains uncertain, as it has been shown to vary from the clinically used value of 1.1. In this work we investigated the RBE of protons and correlated the biological differences with the underlying physical quantities. Materials and Methods Three cell lines were irradiated (CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; A549, human lung adenocarcinoma; and T98, human glioma) and assessed for cell survival by using clonogenic assay. Cells were irradiated with 71- and 160-MeV protons at depths along the Bragg curve and 6-MV photons to various doses. The dose-averaged lineal energy ( y‒D ) was measured under similar conditions as the cells by using a microdosimeter. Dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) was also calculated by using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Survival data were fit by using the linear quadratic model. The RBE values were calculated by comparing the physical dose (D6MV/Dp) that results in 50% (RBE0.5) and 10% (RBE0.1) cell survival, and survival after 2 Gy (RBE2Gy). Results Proton RBE values ranged from 0.89 to 2.40. The RBE for all 3 cell lines increased with decreasing proton energy and was higher at 50% survival than at 10% survival. Additionally, both A549 and T98 cells generally had higher RBE values relative to the CHO cells, indicating a greater biological response to protons. An increase in RBE corresponded with an increase in y‒D and LETd. Conclusion Proton RBE was found to depend on mean proton energy, survival end point, and cell type. Changes in both y‒D and LETd were also found to impact proton RBE values, but consideration of the energy spectrum may provide additional information. The RBE values in this study vary greatly, indicating the clinical value of 1.1 may not be suitable in all cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sarah Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wan Chan Tseung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael G Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jones B, McMahon SJ, Prise KM. The Radiobiology of Proton Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities Around Relative Biological Effectiveness. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:285-292. [PMID: 29454504 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
With the current UK expansion of proton therapy there is a great opportunity for clinical oncologists to develop a translational interest in the associated scientific base and clinical results. In particular, the underpinning controversy regarding the conversion of photon dose to proton dose by the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) must be understood, including its important implications. At the present time, the proton prescribed dose includes an RBE of 1.1 regardless of tissue, tumour and dose fractionation. A body of data has emerged against this pragmatic approach, including a critique of the existing evidence base, due to choice of dose, use of only acute-reacting in vivo assays, analysis methods and the reference radiations used to determine the RBE. Modelling systems, based on the best available scientific evidence, and which include the clinically useful biological effective dose (BED) concept, have also been developed to estimate proton RBEs for different dose and linear energy transfer (LET) values. The latter reflect ionisation density, which progressively increases along each proton track. Late-reacting tissues, such as the brain, where α/β = 2 Gy, show a higher RBE than 1.1 at a low dose per fraction (1.2-1.8 Gy) at LET values used to cover conventional target volumes and can be much higher. RBE changes with tissue depth seem to vary depending on the method of beam delivery used. To reduce unexpected toxicity, which does occasionally follow proton therapy, a more rational approach to RBE allocation, using a variable RBE that depends on dose per fraction and the tissue and tumour radiobiological characteristics such as α/β, is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jones
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK.
| | - S J McMahon
- Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - K M Prise
- Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Howard ME, Beltran C, Anderson S, Tseung WC, Sarkaria JN, Herman MG. Investigating Dependencies of Relative Biological Effectiveness for Proton Therapy in Cancer Cells. Int J Part Ther 2018. [PMID: 30159358 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-17-0031.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) accounts for the differences in biological effect from different radiation types. The RBE for proton therapy remains uncertain, as it has been shown to vary from the clinically used value of 1.1. In this work we investigated the RBE of protons and correlated the biological differences with the underlying physical quantities. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three cell lines were irradiated (CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; A549, human lung adenocarcinoma; and T98, human glioma) and assessed for cell survival by using clonogenic assay. Cells were irradiated with 71- and 160-MeV protons at depths along the Bragg curve and 6-MV photons to various doses. The dose-averaged lineal energy ( y‒D ) was measured under similar conditions as the cells by using a microdosimeter. Dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) was also calculated by using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Survival data were fit by using the linear quadratic model. The RBE values were calculated by comparing the physical dose (D6MV/Dp) that results in 50% (RBE0.5) and 10% (RBE0.1) cell survival, and survival after 2 Gy (RBE2Gy). RESULTS Proton RBE values ranged from 0.89 to 2.40. The RBE for all 3 cell lines increased with decreasing proton energy and was higher at 50% survival than at 10% survival. Additionally, both A549 and T98 cells generally had higher RBE values relative to the CHO cells, indicating a greater biological response to protons. An increase in RBE corresponded with an increase in y‒D and LETd. CONCLUSION Proton RBE was found to depend on mean proton energy, survival end point, and cell type. Changes in both y‒D and LETd were also found to impact proton RBE values, but consideration of the energy spectrum may provide additional information. The RBE values in this study vary greatly, indicating the clinical value of 1.1 may not be suitable in all cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sarah Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wan Chan Tseung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael G Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sørensen BS, Bassler N, Nielsen S, Horsman MR, Grzanka L, Spejlborg H, Swakoń J, Olko P, Overgaard J. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and distal edge effects of proton radiation on early damage in vivo. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1387-1391. [PMID: 28830292 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1351621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the present study was to examine the RBE for early damage in an in vivo mouse model, and the effect of the increased linear energy transfer (LET) towards the distal edge of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). METHOD The lower part of the right hind limb of CDF1 mice was irradiated with single fractions of either 6 MV photons, 240 kV photons or scanning beam protons and graded doses were applied. For the proton irradiation, the leg was either placed in the middle of a 30-mm SOBP, or to assess the effect in different positions, irradiated in 4 mm intervals from the middle of the SOBP to behind the distal dose fall-off. Irradiations were performed with the same dose plan at all positions, corresponding to a dose of 31.25 Gy in the middle of the SOBP. Endpoint of the study was early skin damage of the foot, assessed by a mouse foot skin scoring system. RESULTS The MDD50 values with 95% confidence intervals were 36.1 (34.2-38.1) Gy for protons in the middle of the SOBP for score 3.5. For 6 MV photons, it was 35.9 (34.5-37.5) Gy and 32.6 (30.7-34.7) Gy for 240 kV photons for score 3.5. The corresponding RBE was 1.00 (0.94-1.05), relative to 6 MV photons and 0.9 (0.85-0.97) relative to 240 kV photons. In the mice group positioned at the SOBP distal dose fall-off, 25% of the mice developed early skin damage compared with 0-8% in other groups. LETd,z = 1 was 8.4 keV/μm at the distal dose fall-off and the physical dose delivered was 7% lower than in the central SOBP position, where LETd,z =1 was 3.3 keV/μm. CONCLUSIONS Although there is a need to expand the current study to be able to calculate an exact enhancement ratio, an enhanced biological effect in vivo for early skin damage in the distal edge was demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brita Singers Sørensen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Bassler
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Steffen Nielsen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael R. Horsman
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Leszek Grzanka
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Harald Spejlborg
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jan Swakoń
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Paweł Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To better estimate relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in therapeutic proton beams by using a modeled approach, in order to improve their clinical safety and effectiveness. INTRODUCTION Concerns exist about the 1.1 RBE used in proton therapy, since it may lead to unintentional over- and under-dosage in patients and so lead to unexpected clinical outcomes. Late reacting normal tissues (with low α/β values), might be overdosed if RBE >1.1; very radiosensitive tumors (with high α/β), might be under-dosed if RBE <1.1. Some physicists recommend ignoring RBE in favor of a LET × dose product to predict effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS Extensive linear-quadratic based modeling is scaled between a standard hospital megavoltage photon reference radiation (low LET of 0.22 keV μm-1) α and β values and their values at higher LETs, representative of the middle and end of the SOBPs. A previously published energy-efficiency model provide RBE estimates for different α/β (2-27 Gy). The concept of using a LET × dose product is assessed by comparing it with surviving fraction and the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD-2). RESULTS Low α/β value biosystems have the widest RBE ranges with dose per fraction changes and increasing LET, often above 1.1 even within the SOBP LET range, with lower values at higher dose per fraction. Highly radiosensitive tumors (α/β 10-27 Gy) have the lowest RBEs, often below 1.1, and are not fraction-sensitive. RBE's generally increase with LET, so curtailment of LET in normal tissues is important. The LET × dose product is insufficiently discriminating when compared with surviving fraction and biological effective dose (BED) or EQD-2. CONCLUSIONS An overall research framework is suggested. Proton therapy advantages will only be fully realized if reasonably correct RBE values are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Jones
- Gray Laboratory, CRUK/MRC Oxford Oncology Institute, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nielsen S, Bassler N, Grzanka L, Swakon J, Olko P, Andreassen CN, Overgaard J, Alsner J, Sørensen BS. Differential gene expression in primary fibroblasts induced by proton and cobalt-60 beam irradiation. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1406-1412. [PMID: 28885067 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1351623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proton beam therapy delivers a more conformal dose distribution than conventional radiotherapy, thus improving normal tissue sparring. Increasing linear energy transfer (LET) along the proton track increases the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) near the distal edge of the Spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). The severity of normal tissue side effects following photon beam radiotherapy vary considerably between patients. AIM The dual study aim was to identify gene expression patterns specific to radiation type and proton beam position, and to assess whether individual radiation sensitivity influences gene expression levels in fibroblast cultures irradiated in vitro. METHODS The study includes 30 primary fibroblast cell cultures from patients previously classified as either radiosensitive or radioresistant. Cells were irradiated at three different positions in the proton beam profile: entrance, mid-SOBP and at the SOBP distal edge. Dose was delivered in three fractions × 3.5 Gy(RBE) (RBE 1.1). Cobalt-60 (Co-60) irradiation was used as reference. Real-time qPCR was performed to determine gene expression levels for 17 genes associated with inflammation response, fibrosis and angiogenesis. RESULTS Differences in median gene expression levels were observed for multiple genes such as IL6, IL8 and CXCL12. Median IL6 expression was 30%, 24% and 47% lower in entrance, mid-SOBP and SOBP distal edge groups than in Co-60 irradiated cells. No genes were found to be oppositely regulated by different radiation qualities. Radiosensitive patient samples had the strongest regulation of gene expression; irrespective of radiation type. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that the increased LET at the SOBP distal edge position did not generally lead to increased transcriptive response in primary fibroblast cultures. Inflammatory factors were generally less extensively upregulated by proton irradiation compared with Co-60 photon irradiation. These effects may possibly influence the development of normal tissue damage in patients treated with proton beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Nielsen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Bassler
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Leszek Grzanka
- Proton Radiotherapy Group, Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jan Swakon
- Proton Radiotherapy Group, Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Pawel Olko
- Proton Radiotherapy Group, Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|