Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant

Metal artifact reduction tool and mA levels impact on the diagnosis of fracture extension in endodontically treated teeth using cone-beam CT

AIM

To evaluate the influence of different levels of metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool and milliamperage (mA) on the diagnosis of fracture extension in endodontically treated teeth using cone beam CT (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten maxillary premolars were endodontically treated and positioned in the empty sockets of a human maxilla covered with wax. CBCT acquisitions were performed using the Eagle Edge device (Dabi Atlante, Brazil) adjusted to 120 kVp, FOV of 4 × 6 cm, exposure time of 24 s and voxel size of 0.2 mm in 8 different conditions with different MAR (1, 2 and 3) and mA (3.2 and 6.3) levels. Crown-root fractures were simulated in the universal testing machine, and CBCT images were acquired again. Five radiologists evaluated the presence and extension of fractures with a 5-point scale. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance, Tukey and Kappa test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Although different mA levels did not significantly (p > 0.05) affect the diagnosis values for fracture presence and extension, when evaluated the different levels of MAR, AUC and sensitivity showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05) for MAR 0 using 6.3 mA and kappa agreement showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05) for MAR 0 and 2 using 6.3 mA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mA levels do not have a diagnostic effect when isolating the MAR level; in 6.3 mA, MAR 0 and 2 can positively influence the diagnosis of fracture extension in endodontically treated teeth using CBCT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The isolate evaluation of dental fracture presence can overlook diagnostics error of its extension.

Influence of the metal post material, tooth location in the dental arch, and metal artifact reduction tool on vertical root fracture diagnosis in cone beam CT

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the metal post composition, tooth location in the dental arch, and metal artifact reduction (MAR) on vertical root fracture (VRF) diagnosis in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Twenty-two unirradicular premolars (12 sound and 10 fractured) and two alveolar sockets of a mandible (anterior and posterior regions) composed the sample. CBCT scans of each tooth with a metal post placed into the root canal-silver-palladium (Ag-Pd), cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), or nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr)-were individually acquired for each mandibular region, and two conditions of MAR, using a OP300 device (Instrumentarium, Finland). Images were assessed by five evaluators independently for VRF detection. Diagnostic values were calculated and compared among all groups using multi-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test to investigate the effect of post material, anatomical region, and MAR on VRF diagnosis (α = 0.05). Values of area under the receiver operating curve and specificity were not influenced by the studied factors (p > 0.05). Sensitivity was influenced by the MAR in both mandibular regions (p < 0.05). In the anterior region, sensitivity values increased when the MAR was enabled, regardless of the metal post material (p < 0.05). Similar behavior was noticed in the posterior region for Ni-Cr (p < 0.05) but not for Ag-Pd and Co-Cr posts (p > 0.05). The MAR improved the sensitivity in VRF diagnosis for all tested metal posts in the mandibular anterior region and for the Ni-Cr post in the mandibular posterior region. Therefore, for images obtained in the OP300 CBCT device, activation of the MAR is suggested in these cases.

Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate image artifacts in the vicinity of dental implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained with different spatial orientations, tube current levels, and metal artifact reduction algorithm (MAR) conditions.

Materials and Methods

One dental implant and 2 tubes filled with a radiopaque solution were placed in the posterior region of a mandible using a surgical guide to ensure parallel alignment. CBCT scans were acquired with the mandible in 2 spatial orientations in relation to the X-ray projection plane (standard and modified) at 3 tube current levels: 5, 8, and 11 mA. CBCT scans were repeated without the implant and were reconstructed with and without MAR. The mean voxel and noise values of each tube were obtained and compared using multi-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=0.05).

Results

Mean voxel values were significantly higher and noise values were significantly lower in the modified orientation than in the standard orientation (P<0.05). MAR activation and tube current levels did not show significant differences in most cases of the modified spatial orientation and in the absence of the dental implant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Modifying the spatial orientation of the head increased brightness and reduced spatial orientation noise in adjacent regions of a dental implant, with no influence from the tube current level and MAR.

Influence of an adjacent zirconium implant, tube current, and metal artifact reduction algorithm on horizontal root fracture diagnosis in cone beam computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the influence of an adjacent zirconium implant, tube current (mA), and a metal artifact reduction algorithm (MARA) on horizontal root fracture (HRF) diagnosis in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

STUDY DESIGN

Nineteen teeth (9 with HRF, 10 without) were individually placed in a human maxilla. Scan volumes were acquired without and with a zirconium implant adjacent to the tooth at settings of 4, 8, and 10 mA, with MARA disabled and enabled, using a 5×5 cm field of view, 0.085-mm voxel size, and 90 kV. Four maxillofacial radiologists individually assessed the scans. Diagnostic metrics were compared by multiway analysis of variance (α=5%). Inter- and intraexaminer agreements for HRF diagnosis were evaluated with the weighted kappa test.

RESULTS

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were significantly lower in the presence of the implant (P≤.005). AUC values were higher in scans obtained with 8 and 10 mA compared with 4 mA (P=0.010), but 10 mA without MARA was better with the implant present. MARA did not significantly influence outcomes (P≥0.240). Inter- and intraexaminer agreements ranged from moderate to almost perfect.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the zirconium implant impairs HRF detection. Settings of 8 or 10 mA improve HRF detection regardless MARA condition without the implant. With an adjacent implant, 10 mA without MARA is recommended to improve diagnostic performance.

Mapping artifacts generated in a tooth adjacent to titanium and zirconia implants located in the endomass and exomass in cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated artifact expression in a root adjacent to a dental implant located in the endomass or exomass in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

STUDY DESIGN

We placed a single titanium or zirconia implant adjacent to a premolar root in a dried human mandible and acquired CBCT scans using an OP300 Maxio and a Picasso Trio 3D unit exposing a 5x5cm field of view with the implant in the endomass or exomass (implant groups) or without an implant (control group). We measured the mean gray values (MGVs) for 8 lines of interest (LOIs) around the root canal of the premolar and compared the MGVs by analysis of variance, with significance established at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

For the OP300 Maxio scans, the MGVs of both implant groups in the endomass were lower than the MGVs of the control group. In the exomass, the titanium group had MGVs similar to the control group, but the zirconia group produced significantly lower MGVs than control and titanium groups (P <.0001), indicating the presence of hypodense artifacts. For the Picasso Trio 3D scans, the MGVs of both implant groups in the endomass were similar to the MGVs of the control group. In the exomass, the zirconia group generated lower MGVs than control and titanium groups (P <.0001), indicating hypodense artifacts.

CONCLUSIONS

When performing CBCT examination, titanium implants produce less artifact expression in the exomass, and zirconia implants have less artifact expression in the endomass.

Evaluation of bone repair with platelet-rich fibrin following the extraction of impacted third molars - randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate postoperative effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in wound and bone healing, pain, swelling and periodontal complications outcomes after impacted third molars extraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized, split-mouth, double-blind clinical trial was conducted. PRF was placed within sockets following tooth removal and before suturing mucoperiosteal flap while no treatment was performed on control group's sockets. Patients were evaluated considering bone volume which was obtained in the 90-day postoperative period. Other variables included trabecular thickness, trabecular distance and grey values, pain, swelling, and wound healing. A Wilcoxon test and a t-Student test were used at a 5% significance level and a Friedman test was used to multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Forty-four surgeries were performed in the present study. The patients' mean age was 22.41 (± 2.75 years) and 72.73% were women. PRF was associated to increased trabecular thickness and bone volume means (p < 0.001). The experimental group had significantly lower pain scores at 4h, 6h, 8h, 16h, 24h, and 72h (p ˂ 0.05). Mean swelling was lower on the experimental group (p < 0.001). The PRF group showed significant higher wound healing (p ˂ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Alveolar filling with PRF improves wound and bone healing after extractions while also decreasing pain and swelling in the postoperative period.

The Effect of Changes in the Angular Position of Implants on Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Dental implant artifacts can compromise the quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and challenge radiographic detection in surrounding regions. This literature review was conducted to examine the impact of implant angle modification on reducing metal artifacts in CBCT scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review of literature was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

Different spatial planes, including alpha, beta, gamma, and phi, along with 0°, 5.2°, 9.8°, 14.5°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° angles were studied. Changes in the angular position of implants may reduce metal artifacts and improve the quality of CBCT scans.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotating implants within the alpha plane and angling them at 90° in the alpha plane enables reducing dental implant artifacts.

Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images

Background

This study aimed to compare the amount of artifacts induced by the titanium and zirconium implants on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assess the effect of different exposure settings on the image quality for both materials.

Methods

In this experimental study, 30 zirconium and 30 titanium implants were placed in bovine rib bone blocks. CBCT images were taken in two different fields of view (FOV: 4 × 6 cm² and 6 × 8 cm²) and at two resolutions (133 µ and 200 µ voxel size). Subsequently, two observers assessed the images and detected the amount of artifacts around the implants through gray values. Data were analyzed by paired t test and independent t test using SPSS 21 and the 0.05 significance level.

Results

The results showed that titanium implants caused lower amounts of artifacts than zirconium implants, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The larger FOV (6 × 8 cm²) resulted in a lower amount of artifacts in both groups, although the results were only statistically significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). The amount of artifacts was increased when using the 133 µ voxel size in both groups, which was only significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that zirconium implants induce higher amounts of artifacts than titanium ones. We also concluded that the artifacts could be minimized using the larger FOV and voxel size.

Influence of artefacts generated by titanium and zirconium implants in the study of trabecular bone architecture in cone-beam CT images

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of artefacts generated by titanium and zirconium implants on trabecular bone architecture assessment through cone-beam CT (CBCT). The influence of kilovoltage (kVp) and metal artefact reduction (MAR) in such analysis was also assessed.

METHODS

CBCT scans were obtained with Picasso Trio with or without a titanium or zirconium implants in a posterior region of a mandible using 70, 80 or 90 kVp, with or without MAR. The other acquisition settings were constant: field of view 8 × 5 cm, voxel size 0.2 mm, 5 mA, 24 s and 720 frames. Two volumes of interest (VOIs) were determined comprising trabecular bone mesial and distal to the implant area. The following morphometric parameters were measured: connectivity density (Conn. Dn.), fractal dimension (FD), bone volume fraction (BV/TV), bone surface density (BS/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th.), and trabecular spacing (Tb. Sp.), and compared by multiway ANOVA (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

For Conn. Dn. and FD, with MAR, the zirconium group showed values significantly lower than the other groups (p < 0.05). For BV/TV, BS/TV, Tb. Th. and Tb. Sp., the zirconium group showed the highest values, regardless of MAR condition (p < 0.05). MAR increased BS/TV and Tb. Th. values, and decreased FD values for zirconium group. In general, the kVp level did not influence trabecular morphometric parameters.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of the trabecular bone architecture was mainly influenced by the expression of the artefacts generated by zirconium implants. MAR decreased the FD and increased the BS/TV and Tb.Th. values regardless of the kVp level.

The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) amounts to an excellent diagnostic tool to evaluate the peri-implant bone thickness in all dimensions. Despite the unquestionable advantages of CBCT, potential artifacts around dental implants might disturb the proper assessment of the surrounding structures. The artifacts may mask osseointegration, shallow bone defects, and other types of radiolucency, which make it difficult to establish an early diagnosis of bone loss. Proper diagnosis of bone defect is necessary to decide about surgical intervention. The aim of this literature review is to assess the CBCT exposure causing artifacts on the peri-implant structures. An electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed) database includes studies published before July 2021 and supplemented by manual research. Clinical, ex vivo, in vitro, and animal studies evaluating the relationship between exposition parameters and occurrence of artifacts around the dental implant in CBCT studies were included. A literature review revealed that kilovoltage, tube current, and field of view may affect the occurrence of artifacts around dental implants, all of which would compromise radiological evaluation. Therefore, it is feasible to reduce the incidence of artifacts and improve the image quality by appropriate modification of the exposure parameters. However, the reduction of artifacts is often associated with a significant increase in radiation exposure; hence, an effort should be made to minimize the radiation dose in line with the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle.

Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of kilovoltage-peak (kVp) and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the detection of buccal and lingual peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) and zirconia (Zr) implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and Methods

Twenty implant sites were created in the posterior region of human mandibles, including control sites (without dehiscence) and experimental sites (with dehiscence). Individually, a Ti-Zr or Zr implant was placed in each implant site. CBCT scans were performed using a Picasso Trio device, with variation in the kVp setting (70 or 90 kVp) and whether the MAR tool was used. Three oral radiologists scored the detection of dehiscence using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared by multi-way analysis of variance (α=0.05).

Results

The kVp, cortical plate involved (buccal or lingual cortices), and MAR did not influence any diagnostic values (P>0.05). The material of the implant did not influence the ROC curve values (P>0.05). In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity were statistically significantly influenced by the implant material (P<0.05) with Zr implants showing higher sensitivity values and lower specificity values than Ti-Zr implants.

Conclusion

The detection of peri-implant dehiscence was not influenced by kVp, use of the MAR tool, or the cortical plate. Greater sensitivity and lower specificity were shown for the detection of peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of a Zr implant.

Application of an auto-edge counting method for quantification of metal artifacts in CBCT images: a multivariate analysis of object position, field of view size, tube voltage, and metal artifact reduction algorithm

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the effects of object position, field of view (FOV) size, peak kilovoltage (kVp), and a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm on metal artifacts in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as measured with an auto-edge counting method.

STUDY DESIGN

A titanium implant and a stainless steel intracanal post in a root were inserted in bovine rib blocks. CBCT scans were acquired with changes in object position (incisor, canine, and premolar-molar areas), FOV, kVp, and MAR (on or off) mode. Images were quantitatively analyzed in MATLAB by using the Canny edge detection algorithm. Four-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests were applied for data analysis.

RESULTS

The implant produced no significant differences in number of artifacts among the object positions through changing the kVp and MAR mode for all FOV sizes (P > .05). The intracanal post scanned with the medium-sized FOV, high kVp, and MAR off mode generated significant differences among object positions (P = .033). Among the variables assessed, FOV size and MAR mode had a significant influence on the number of artifacts (P ≤ .039).

CONCLUSION

Reduction of FOV size and application of the MAR tool significantly decreased the number of streak artifacts. The Canny edge detection algorithm could be an efficient method of metal artifact quantification.

Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the number of basis images and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the production of artifacts near and far from a zirconium implant in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CBCT scans of a mandible were acquired before and after insertion of an implant, using 450 and 720 basis images, with and without MAR activation. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the gray values of the regions of interest (ROIs) located on the cortices adjacent to the implant and at different distances from it (in the soft tissue) were calculated. The mean of the gray values was used to calculate the absolute contrast difference (ACD) between the control and implant scans.

RESULTS

In general, the number of basis images did not affect the SD and the ACD values of the buccal and lingual ROIs (p > 0.05). The implant increased the SD in the lingual cortical plate (p < 0.05). In this case, MAR activation decreased SD (p < 0.05). All ROIs located at different distances from the implant showed higher SD on scans acquired with 450 basis images (p < 0.05), regardless of MAR condition.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher number of basis images reduces the magnitude of artifacts but does not influence the image quality in bone cortical plates. MAR improves the image in the areas most affected by artifacts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The number of basis images is known as a factor capable of influencing the image quality and radiation dose for the patient. Therefore, it is important to investigate its effect on the expression of artifacts in the CBCT images.

Do the tube current and metal artifact reduction influence the diagnosis of vertical root fracture in a tooth positioned in the vicinity of a zirconium implant? A CBCT study

AIM

To evaluate the influence of the tube current and metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRF) in a tooth adjacent to a zirconium implant, in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty single-rooted teeth (15 with VRF and 15 control group) were individually positioned in a mandible, and scanned with the OP300 CBCT unit. Images were acquired using a standardized protocol: 5 × 5 cm field of view, 0.08-mm voxel size, and 90 kVp. Each tooth was scanned with and without a zirconium implant in its vicinity, using different tube currents (4 mA, 8 mA, and 10 mA) and conditions of MAR (enabled × disabled). Diagnostic values were calculated for each protocol, and compared by multi-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The ROC curve and sensitivity values did not differ significantly among the tube currents, regardless of the presence of the implant and MAR condition (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences among the tube currents for the specificity values (p > 0.05); however, the specificity differed significantly between the "with implant" and "without implant" conditions, within the same MAR condition and tube current (p < 0.05). Specificity was significantly lower when the implant was present (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a zirconium implant impairs the diagnosis of VRF in teeth adjacent to the artifact-generator material. Neither the tube current nor the MAR tool is effective in improving this diagnostic task. Therefore, in this clinical scenario, the use of the lowest tube current (4 mA), without MAR activation, is recommended.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Considering that the tube current is one of the main factors that influence the radiation dose and image quality in CBCT, and that metal artifacts negatively influence the diagnosis of VRF in areas adjacent to the artifact-generator material, it is important to evaluate the effect of this energetic parameter in the diagnosis of VRF in teeth adjacent to zirconium implants.

Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the magnitude of artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained with different tube currents and with or without metal artifact reduction (MAR).

Materials and Methods

A tooth was inserted in a dry human mandible socket, and CBCT scans were acquired after root canal instrumentation, root canal filling, and metal post placement with various tube currents with and without MAR activation. The artifact magnitude was assessed by the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the various distances from the tooth. Data were compared using multi-way analysis of variance.

Results

At all distances, a current of 4 mA was associated with a higher SD and a lower CNR than 8 mA or 10 mA (P<0.05). For the metal posts without MAR, the artifact magnitude as assessed by SD was greatest at 1.5 cm or less (P<0.05). When MAR was applied, SD values for distances 1.5 cm or closer to the tooth were reduced (P<0.05). MAR usage did not influence the magnitude of artifacts in the control and gutta-percha groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Increasing the tube current from 4 mA to 8 mA may reduce the magnitude of artifacts from metal posts. The magnitude of artifacts arising from metal posts was significantly higher at distances of 1.5 cm or less than at greater distances. MAR usage improved image quality near the metal post, but had no significant influence farther than 1.5 cm from the tooth.

Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?

Purpose

This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm activated at different times during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition on the magnitude of artifacts generated by a zirconium implant.

Materials and Methods

Volumes were obtained with and without a zirconium implant in a human mandible, using the OP300 Maxio unit. Three modes were tested: without MAR, with MAR activated after acquisition, and with MAR activated before acquisition. Artifacts were assessed in terms of the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 6 regions of interest with different distances (10 to 35 mm, from the nearest to the farthest) and angulations (70° to 135°) from the implant region.

Results

In the acquisitions without MAR, the regions closer to the implant (10 and 15 mm) had a higher SD and lower CNR than the farther regions. When MAR was activated (before or after), SD values did not differ among the regions (P>0.05). The region closest to the implant presented a significantly lower CNR in the acquisitions without MAR than when MAR was activated after the acquisition; however, activating MAR before the acquisition did not yield significant differences from either of the other conditions.

Conclusion

Both modes of MAR activation were effective in decreasing the magnitude of CBCT artifacts, especially when the effects of the artifacts were more noticeable.