Detection of vertical root fractures by cone-beam computed tomography based on deep learning

Automatic Vertical Root Fracture Detection on Intraoral Periapical Radiographs With Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Enhancement

BACKGROUND/AIM

To explore transfer learning (TL) techniques for enhancing vertical root fracture (VRF) diagnosis accuracy and to assess the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on image enhancement for VRF detection on both extracted teeth images and intraoral images taken from patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dataset of 378 intraoral periapical radiographs comprising 195 teeth with fractures and 183 teeth without fractures serving as controls was included. DenseNet, ConvNext, Inception121, and MobileNetV2 were employed with model fusion. Prior to evaluation, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Deep Learning (DL) image enhancement were applied. Performance assessment included accuracy rate, precision, recall, F1-score, AUC, and kappa values. Intra- and inter-observer agreement, according to the Gold Standard (GS), were assessed using ICC and t-tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The DenseNet + Inception fusion model achieved the highest accuracy rate of 0.80, with commendable recall, F1-score, and AUC values, supported by precision (0.81) and kappa (0.60) values. Molar tooth examination yielded an accuracy rate, precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.80, with an AUC of 0.84 and kappa of 0.60. For premolar teeth, the fusion network showed an accuracy rate of 0.78, an AUC of 0.78, and notable metrics, including F1-score (0.80), recall (0.85), precision (0.71), and kappa (0.55). ICC results demonstrated acceptable agreement (≥ 0.57 for molars, ≥ 0.52 for premolars).

CONCLUSION

TL methods have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy for VRFs in radiographic imaging. TL is emerging as a valuable tool in the development of robust, automated diagnostic systems for VRF identification, ultimately supporting clinicians in delivering more accurate diagnoses.

Mapping the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Analysis for Clinical Decision-Making in Dentistry: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging field in dentistry. AI is gradually being integrated into dentistry to improve clinical dental practice. The aims of this scoping review were to investigate the application of AI in image analysis for decision-making in clinical dentistry and identify trends and research gaps in the current literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review followed the guidelines provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). An electronic literature search was performed through PubMed and Scopus. After removing duplicates, a preliminary screening based on titles and abstracts was performed. A full-text review and analysis were performed according to predefined inclusion criteria, and data were extracted from eligible articles.

RESULTS

Of the 1334 articles returned, 276 met the inclusion criteria (consisting of 601,122 images in total) and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most of the included studies utilized convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on dental radiographs such as orthopantomograms (OPGs) and intraoral radiographs (bitewings and periapicals). AI was applied across all fields of dentistry - particularly oral medicine, oral surgery, and orthodontics - for direct clinical inference and segmentation. AI-based image analysis was use in several components of the clinical decision-making process, including diagnosis, detection or classification, prediction, and management.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of machine learning and deep learning techniques are being used for dental image analysis to assist clinicians in making accurate diagnoses and choosing appropriate interventions in a timely manner.

Artificial intelligence in endodontics: Data preparation, clinical applications, ethical considerations, limitations, and future directions

Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative technology in healthcare, including endodontics. A gap in knowledge exists in understanding AI's applications and limitations among endodontic experts. This comprehensive review aims to (A) elaborate on technical and ethical aspects of using data to implement AI models in endodontics; (B) elaborate on evaluation metrics; (C) review the current applications of AI in endodontics; and (D) review the limitations and barriers to real-world implementation of AI in the field of endodontics and its future potentials/directions. The article shows that AI techniques have been applied in endodontics for critical tasks such as detection of radiolucent lesions, analysis of root canal morphology, prediction of treatment outcome and post-operative pain and more. Deep learning models like convolutional neural networks demonstrate high accuracy in these applications. However, challenges remain regarding model interpretability, generalizability, and adoption into clinical practice. When thoughtfully implemented, AI has great potential to aid with diagnostics, treatment planning, clinical interventions, and education in the field of endodontics. However, concerted efforts are still needed to address limitations and to facilitate integration into clinical workflows.

Artificial intelligent-driven decision-making for automating root fracture detection in periapical radiographs

BACKGROUND

The detection and early diagnosis of root fractures can be challenging; this difficulty applies particularly to newly qualified dentists. Aside from clinical examination, diagnosis often requires radiographic assessment. Nonetheless, human fallibility can introduce errors due to a lack of experience.

AIM

The proposed system aimed to assist in detecting root fractures through the integration of artificial intelligence techniques into the diagnosis process as a step for automating dental diagnosis and decision-making processes.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A total of 400 radiographic images of fractured and unfractured teeth were obtained for the present research. Data handling techniques were implemented to balance the distribution of the samples. The AI-based system used the voting technique for five different pretrained models namely, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50. DenseNet121, and DenseNet169 to perform the analysis. The parameters used for the analysis of the models are loss and accuracy curves.

RESULTS

VGG16 exhibited notable success with low training and validation losses (0.09% and 0.18%, respectively), high specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV). VGG19 showed potential overfitting concerns, while ResNet50 displayed progress in minimizing loss but exhibited bias toward unfractured cases. DenseNet121 effectively addressed overfitting and noise issues, achieving balanced metrics and impressive PPVs for both fractured and unfractured cases (0.933 and 0.898 respectively). With increased depth, DenseNet169 demonstrated enhanced generalization capability.

CONCLUSION

The proposed AI- based system demonstrated high precision and sensitivity for detecting root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by utilizing the voting method.

Identification of Root Canal Morphology in Fused-rooted Mandibular Second Molars From X-ray Images Based on Deep Learning

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the intricate anatomical morphology of fused-rooted mandibular second molars (MSMs) is essential for root canal treatment. The present study utilized a deep learning approach to identify the three-dimensional root canal morphology of MSMs from two-dimensional X-ray images.

METHODS

A total of 271 fused-rooted MSMs were included in the study. Micro-computed tomography reconstruction images and two-dimensional X-ray projection images were obtained. The ground truth of three-dimensional root canal morphology was determined through micro-computed tomography images, which were classified into merging, symmetrical, and asymmetrical types. To amplify the X-ray image dataset, traditional augmentation techniques from the python package Augmentor and a multiangle projection method were employed. Identification of root canal morphology was conducted using the pretrained VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet50, and EfficientNet-b5 on X-ray images. The classification results from convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were then compared with those performed by endodontic residents.

RESULTS

The multiangle projection augmentation method outperformed the traditional approach in all CNNs except for EfficientNet-b5. ResNet18 combined with the multiangle projection method outperformed all other combinations, with an overall accuracy of 79.25%. In specific classifications, accuracies of 81.13%, 86.79%, and 90.57% were achieved for merging, symmetrical, and asymmetrical types, respectively. Notably, CNNs surpassed endodontic residents in classification performance; the average accuracy for endodontic residents was only 60.38% (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

CNNs were more effective than endodontic residents in identifying the three-dimensional root canal morphology of MSMs. The result indicates that CNNs possess the capacity to employ two-dimensional images effectively in aiding three-dimensional diagnoses.

Artificial Intelligence in Endodontic Education

AIMS

The future dental and endodontic education must adapt to the current digitalized healthcare system in a hyper-connected world. The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the ways an endodontic education curriculum could benefit from the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and overcome the limitations of this technology in the delivery of healthcare to patients.

METHODS

An electronic search was carried out up to December 2023 using MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and a manual search of reference literature. Grey literature, ongoing clinical trials were also searched using ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

The search identified 251 records, of which 35 were deemed relevant to artificial intelligence (AI) and Endodontic education. Areas in which AI might aid students with their didactic and clinical endodontic education were identified as follows: 1) radiographic interpretation; 2) differential diagnosis; 3) treatment planning and decision-making; 4) case difficulty assessment; 5) preclinical training; 6) advanced clinical simulation and case-based training, 7) real-time clinical guidance; 8) autonomous systems and robotics; 9) progress evaluation and personalized education; 10) calibration and standardization.

CONCLUSIONS

AI in endodontic education will support clinical and didactic teaching through individualized feedback; enhanced, augmented, and virtually generated training aids; automated detection and diagnosis; treatment planning and decision support; and AI-based student progress evaluation, and personalized education. Its implementation will inarguably change the current concept of teaching Endodontics. Dental educators would benefit from introducing AI in clinical and didactic pedagogy; however, they must be aware of AI's limitations and challenges to overcome.

Application of deep learning and feature selection technique on external root resorption identification on CBCT images

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence has been proven to improve the identification of various maxillofacial lesions. The aim of the current study is two-fold: to assess the performance of four deep learning models (DLM) in external root resorption (ERR) identification and to assess the effect of combining feature selection technique (FST) with DLM on their ability in ERR identification.

METHODS

External root resorption was simulated on 88 extracted premolar teeth using tungsten bur in different depths (0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm). All teeth were scanned using a Cone beam CT (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, GA). Afterward, a training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) dataset were established. The performance of four DLMs including Random Forest (RF) + Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG), RF + EfficienNetB4 (EFNET), Support Vector Machine (SVM) + VGG, and SVM + EFNET) and four hybrid models (DLM + FST: (i) FS + RF + VGG, (ii) FS + RF + EFNET, (iii) FS + SVM + VGG and (iv) FS + SVM + EFNET) was compared. Five performance parameters were assessed: classification accuracy, F1-score, precision, specificity, and error rate. FST algorithms (Boruta and Recursive Feature Selection) were combined with the DLMs to assess their performance.

RESULTS

RF + VGG exhibited the highest performance in identifying ERR, followed by the other tested models. Similarly, FST combined with RF + VGG outperformed other models with classification accuracy, F1-score, precision, and specificity of 81.9%, weighted accuracy of 83%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 96%. Kruskal Wallis test revealed a significant difference (p = 0.008) in the prediction accuracy among the eight DLMs.

CONCLUSION

In general, all DLMs have similar performance on ERR identification. However, the performance can be improved by combining FST with DLMs.

Evaluating a Periapical Lesion Detection CNN on a Clinically Representative CBCT Dataset-A Validation Study

The aim of this validation study was to comprehensively evaluate the performance and generalization capability of a deep learning-based periapical lesion detection algorithm on a clinically representative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dataset and test for non-inferiority. The evaluation involved 195 CBCT images of adult upper and lower jaws, where sensitivity and specificity metrics were calculated for all teeth, stratified by jaw, and stratified by tooth type. Furthermore, each lesion was assigned a periapical index score based on its size to enable a score-based evaluation. Non-inferiority tests were conducted with proportions of 90% for sensitivity and 82% for specificity. The algorithm achieved an overall sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 84.3%. The non-inferiority test indicated the rejection of the null hypothesis for specificity but not for sensitivity. However, when excluding lesions with a periapical index score of one (i.e., very small lesions), the sensitivity improved to 90.4%. Despite the challenges posed by the dataset, the algorithm demonstrated promising results. Nevertheless, further improvements are needed to enhance the algorithm's robustness, particularly in detecting very small lesions and the handling of artifacts and outliers commonly encountered in real-world clinical scenarios.

Deep Learning in Diagnosis of Dental Anomalies and Diseases: A Systematic Review

Deep learning and diagnostic applications in oral and dental health have received significant attention recently. In this review, studies applying deep learning to diagnose anomalies and diseases in dental image material were systematically compiled, and their datasets, methodologies, test processes, explainable artificial intelligence methods, and findings were analyzed. Tests and results in studies involving human-artificial intelligence comparisons are discussed in detail to draw attention to the clinical importance of deep learning. In addition, the review critically evaluates the literature to guide and further develop future studies in this field. An extensive literature search was conducted for the 2019-May 2023 range using the Medline (PubMed) and Google Scholar databases to identify eligible articles, and 101 studies were shortlisted, including applications for diagnosing dental anomalies (n = 22) and diseases (n = 79) using deep learning for classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks. According to the results, the most commonly used task type was classification (n = 51), the most commonly used dental image material was panoramic radiographs (n = 55), and the most frequently used performance metric was sensitivity/recall/true positive rate (n = 87) and accuracy (n = 69). Dataset sizes ranged from 60 to 12,179 images. Although deep learning algorithms are used as individual or at least individualized architectures, standardized architectures such as pre-trained CNNs, Faster R-CNN, YOLO, and U-Net have been used in most studies. Few studies have used the explainable AI method (n = 22) and applied tests comparing human and artificial intelligence (n = 21). Deep learning is promising for better diagnosis and treatment planning in dentistry based on the high-performance results reported by the studies. For all that, their safety should be demonstrated using a more reproducible and comparable methodology, including tests with information about their clinical applicability, by defining a standard set of tests and performance metrics.