Efficacy of personal protective equipment to prevent environmental infection of COVID-19 among healthcare workers: a systematic review

Plastic Waste and COVID-19 Incidence Among Hospital Staff After Deescalation in PPE Use

Importance

In September 2023, the Singapore Ministry of Health revised the national personal protective equipment (PPE) guideline for health care personnel (HCP) attending to suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19, recommending the use of N95 respirators alone. However, data on the associations between PPE deescalation, staff COVID-19 incidence, and sustainability outcomes are limited.

Objective

To evaluate the associations between PPE deescalation guidelines on staff COVID-19 incidence and the environmental sustainability outcomes of the measure.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective quality improvement study of hospital PPE usage using data from Tan Tock Seng Hospital and the National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID), analyzing monthly COVID-19 incidence rates among HCP (all medical staff, allied health care workers, ancillary staff, and administrative staff from the hospital campus) and in the community over 12 months before and after PPE deescalation measures (October 2021 to September 2022 and October 2022 to September 2023).

Main Outcomes and Measures

COVID-19 incidence rates among HCP and in the community; economic and environmental outcomes of removing single-use gowns from routine COVID-19 care, including reductions in carbon footprint, plastic waste generation, and cost savings.

Results

The mean (SD) monthly number of HCP was 10 774 (79) (range, 10 636-10 891) preimplementation and 11 099 (200) (range, 10 864-11 449) postimplementation. Our analysis revealed PPE deescalation was not associated with an increase in monthly COVID-19 infections among hospital staff, with the trends aligning with population infection rates. The median (IQR) staff COVID-19 infection rate relative to the community COVID-19 infection rate was 2.6 (1.9-3.6) preimplementation compared with 1.5 (0.9-3.1) postimplementation. An estimated 4 gowns per patient-day were saved, totaling 440 532 gowns over 12 months. This equated to an estimated reduction in health care costs by SGD 453 748 (approximately USD 333 970) and reductions of 398 681.46 kg carbon dioxide equivalent in carbon emissions and 66 080 kg of plastic waste.

Conclusions and Relevance

This quality improvement study of hospital PPE usage observed that the national PPE deescalation guidelines corresponded with the reductions in protective gown use, associated costs, carbon footprint, and plastic waste generation with no apparent compromise to staff safety and health.

Artificial intelligence (AI) use for personal protective equipment training, remediation, and education in health care

BACKGROUND

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is a first-line transmission-based precaution for reducing the spread of nosocomial infections between health care workers (HCWs), patients, and staff. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted a problematic skill gap in effective PPE donning/doffing.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, mixed-methods, prospective cohort study of 293 HCWs in Sydney, Australia. Participants were assessed using SXR AI-PPE, an artificial intelligence (AI) system that autonomously evaluates donning/doffing of PPE while providing real-time feedback on user technique.

RESULTS

Longitudinal results showed improved accuracy rates for correct donning/doffing after each guided session conducted at 3-monthly intervals, with a 100% accuracy rate for correct use of PPE after 2 guided sessions. These improvements were maintained with 3-monthly training sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

The SXR AI-PPE platform is a comprehensive tool capable of training PPE donning/doffing by HCWs in real time with implications for reducing PPE contamination and risk of nosocomial infections.

A Pilot Study Exploring the Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Employees Handling Healthcare Waste in Selected Healthcare Risk Waste Facilities in Johannesburg, South Africa

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has increased healthcare waste (HCW) across the globe, giving rise to new challenges such as illegal dumping of medical waste, and an increased risk to hazardous waste exposure such as blood and body fluids that could cause diseases. The study aimed to determine factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees handling medical waste in selected healthcare risk waste (HCRW) facilities in Johannesburg, South Africa. The pilot study followed a cross-sectional design, where self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data on occupation-related risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 among HCW handlers working in waste generation, transportation, and final disposal. A total of 33 participants selected from eight HCRW facilities participated in the study. The analysis showed that 21.9% (n = 7) of the HCW handlers who participated in the study reported a positive test result for COVID-19, while 78.1% (n = 26) reported a negative test result for COVID-19. The logistic regression analysis showed that repeated handling of HCW (COR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.00-2.25) and not having sufficient hand washing facilities (COR: 1.13: 95% CI: 1.04-1.24) increased the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, these factors were not significant as risks for SARS-CoV-2. In the multivariable analysis, not being trained on personal protective equipment (PPE) use (AOR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00-1.58) increased the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection, while having 3-6 years of experience in medical waste handling significantly lowered the odds of occupation-related SARS-CoV-2 infection by 33% (AOR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95). These preliminary findings show that factors such as the accessibility of handwashing facilities, training on the use of PPE, years of work experience, and repeated contact with medical waste may play a role in modifying the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCW handlers. A study with a larger sample size is needed to comprehensively quantify occupation related risk factors associated with communicable disease infections among HCW handlers.

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection before and after the Omicron wave in a cohort of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal healthcare worker (HCW) cohorts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic provide a unique opportunity to study the relative contributions of various exposures to infection risk over time. This study aimed to examine how demographic, health, occupational, household and community factors influenced the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in a cohort of HCWs in Southeastern Ontario, Canada, during the early pandemic and the Omicron waves. We compared the contribution of these factors to infection risk and explored the implications for future epidemic preparedness and the protection of HCWs.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal analysis using data from a cohort of HCWs recruited from one acute care hospital and four long-term care homes. The analysis was divided into two periods: the initial phase of the pandemic (period #1) and the first three Omicron waves (period #2). We employed Poisson regression for period #1 and Cox regression for period #2 to examine associations of demographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity, migration status, income insufficiency), health factors (chronic conditions, smoking history, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status), household factors (exposure to COVID-19), occupational factors (work role, exposure to COVID-19 patients, personal protective equipment access, aerosol-generating procedures) and community exposures (use of masks, distance, hand-washing) with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

RESULTS

At period #1, 17/208 (8.2%) HCWs reported having had SARS-CoV-2 infection. At period #2, 65/167 (38.3%) reported at least one SARS-CoV-2 infection. In period #1, factors associated with increased risk of infection included working in a long-term care home, exposure to more COVID-19-positive patients, working as a nurse or therapist, and inadequate use of personal protective equipment. In period #2, the hazard of infection was higher among HCWs who had COVID-19-infected children at home, whereas the use of protective measures in the community (maintaining social distance, mask-wearing) and receiving a vaccine booster were associated with reduced risk. Providing care to COVID-19 patients was not associated with the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection at period #2.

CONCLUSIONS

During the Omicron wave, community and household exposures, but not occupational exposure to COVID-19 cases, were the primary factors contributing to infection risk in HCWs. This contrasts with the early waves of the pandemic where occupational exposures played a significant role. These findings may be explained by the effectiveness of institutional interventions in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in healthcare settings, alongside the failure of community-level interventions to mitigate risk during the Omicron period.

COVID-19: Training activities, adherence, and use of personal protective equipment in Primary Health Care

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the association between participation in training activities and the adherence to and use of personal protective equipment by workers and professionals involved in Health Residency Programs in Primary Health Care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

a cross-sectional study in Brazil between August/2020 and March/2021. We utilized the EPI-APS COVID-19 instrument and its adapted version for resident professionals.

RESULTS

455 PHC workers and 102 residents participated in the study. Among them, 54.5% and 55.9%, respectively, engaged in training activities. We observed an association between participation in training activities and the proper use of gloves (p<0.001), gowns (p=0.009), goggles/face shields (p=0.002), and overall adherence (p<0.001) among PHC workers, and the proper use of surgical masks (p=0.028) among residents. Adherence rates of ≥75% were identified in 6.9% of PHC workers and none among the residents.

CONCLUSION

training activities are associated with increased adherence to and proper use of PPE.

Tracheal tube infections in critical care: A narrative review of influencing factors, microbial agents, and mitigation strategies in intensive care unit settings

Tracheal tube infections pose significant challenges in the management of mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units. These infections contribute to prolonged intensive care unit stays, increased healthcare costs, the spread of antibiotic resistance, and poor patient outcomes. This study aims to elucidate the complex relationship between environmental factors, hospital practices, and the incidence of tracheal tube infections. Our comprehensive review explores the impact of factors such as air quality, water sources, equipment contamination, ventilation strategies, infection control protocols, and microbial reservoirs within hospital settings on tracheal tube infection rates. Additionally, it investigates global variations in tracheal tube infection prevalence, which are influenced by differences in healthcare infrastructure, infection control adherence, antibiotic resistance profiles, and patient demographics. Our findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions and collaborative approaches to reduce the burden of tracheal tube infections and improve patient care in intensive care units. By fully understanding the interplay between environmental conditions and hospital practices, effective prevention and management strategies can be developed to reduce the impact of tracheal tube infections on patient outcomes and healthcare resources, ultimately enhancing the quality of care in critical care settings.

The effect of hypochlorous acid inhalation on the activity of antioxidant system enzymes in rats of different ages

Hypochlorous acid HOCl is an effective disinfectant with a broad spectrum and high rate of microbicidal action. Its use for air treatment can be an effective tool for the prevention and therapy of infectious diseases. In this work, the in vivo study was conducted on 110 Wistar Han rats (12 and 72 weeks old) on the effect of a single inhalation of air containing gaseous HOCl on the activity of antioxidant system enzymes. For this, a special installation was designed to uniformly maintain the concentration of HOCl in the air and regulate it over a wide range. Inhalation exposure was carried out for 4 h at total chlorine concentrations in the air of approximately 2.0 mg/m3 and 5.0 mg/m3, after which the animals were observed for 14 days. The effect of inhalation on the antioxidant system activity varied significantly in animals of different ages. Catalase activity in young rats increased approximately 2-fold on days 1-2 after inhalation, regardless of the HOCl concentration, while in old animals a sharp dose-dependent decrease was initially observed. The glutathione peroxidase activity in animals of both ages increased upon inhalation of air with 5.0 mg/m3 HOCl, and in old animals this was more pronounced; when the HOCl concentration decreased to 2.0 mg/m3, this indicator increased slightly in old rats and remained virtually unchanged in young ones. The glutathione reductase activity when exposed to 2.0 mg/m3 HOCl did not change for both age groups, and with increasing HOCl concentration it increased by 1.5-2.0 times in all animals.

Personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during COVID-19: Developing and applying a questionnaire and assessing associations between infection rates and shortages across 19 countries

This study aimed to assess the preparedness of European countries regarding personal protective equipment (PPE) for health and care workers (HCWs), the COVID-19 infection rates of HCWs compared to the general working age population, and the association between these. We developed a PPE-preparedness scale based on responses to a questionnaire from experts in the Health Systems and Policy Monitor network, with a response rate of 19 out of 31 countries. COVID-19 infection data were retrieved form the European center for Disease Prevention and Control. Shortages of PPE were found in most countries, in particular in home care and long-term care. HCW infection rates, compared to the general population, varied strongly between countries, influenced by different testing regimes. We found no relationships between HCW infection rates, PPE preparedness and shortages of PPE. Improved surveillance in the population as well as for HCWS are needed to be able to better assess these relationships.

Infection Risk Prediction in Healthcare Settings: Lessons from COVID-19 Contact Tracing

Objective

Contact tracing aids epidemic control by enabling early detection and isolation without overburdening healthcare systems despite potential challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the practical application of contact and risk assessment-based models in predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection following exposure among healthcare workers in a large tertiary public university hospital in Türkiye.

Materials and Methods

The study was designed as a retrospective cohort study, including contact tracing data from 3389 exposed healthcare workers from March 23, 2020, to October 22, 2021. Contact-based (mask use, contact duration and distance) and exposure risk-assessment-based (low, medium, high-risk) models with and without having symptoms were generated using logistic regression. SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as having a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test result. Adjustments were made to the models for demographic and occupational variables, previous infection, and vaccination. Model parameters were compared.

Results

Of 3389 exposed healthcare workers, 2451 underwent RT-PCR testing. Among those tested, RT-PCR positivity was 5.9% (144/2451). Lack of personal protective equipment use (odds ratio [OR]=1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-2.66) and ≥15 minutes of contact duration (1.89, 1.21-3.09) were significantly associated with RT-PCR positivity. In the risk-assessment model, being a high-risk contact increased the odds of RT-PCR positivity (OR=2.76, 95% CI=1.61-5.03). Adding the presence of symptoms to contact-based and risk assessment models improved model parameters (Akaike information criterion [AIC]: from 1086.1 to 1083.1; Tjur's R2: from 0.016 to 0.019, respectively).

Conclusion

The inclusion of being symptomatic improved the contact-based and risk assessment-based models. Institutions should be encouraged to incorporate symptom inquiries into risk assessment protocols in response to newly emerging respiratory virus epidemics. Institutions lacking the capacity for extensive contact tracing are recommended, at minimum, to track symptomatic exposed workers for epidemic control.

Comparison of the inward leakage rate between N95 filtering facepiece respirators and modified surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Owing to shortage of surgical and N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during the COVID-2019 pandemic, various masks were developed to prevent infection. This study aimed to examine the inward leakage rate (ILR) of sealed face masks and modified surgical masks using a quantitative fit test and compared it with the ILR of unmodified N95 FFRs.

METHODS

We conducted paired comparisons of ILRs of bent nose-fit wire masks, double masks, and N95 FFRs from October to December 2021. To measure the protective effectiveness of masks, participants wore masks, and the number of particles outside and inside the mask were measured. The ILR was based on the percentage of particles entering the mask using a fit tester.

RESULTS

We enrolled 54 participants (20 men and 34 women) in this study. The median ILR for surgical masks without and with a W-shaped bend in the nose-fit wire were 96.44% and 50.82%, respectively. The nose-fit wire adjustment reduced the ILR of surgical masks by a mean of 28.57%, which was significantly lower than the ILR without adjustment (P < 0.001). For double masks, with surgical or polyurethane masks on top of the W-shaped mask, the ILR did not differ significantly from that of N95. Although the filtration performance of double surgical masks matched that of N95 masks, their ILR was notably higher, indicating that double masks do not provide equivalent protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Wearing N95 masks alone is effective in many cases. However, surgical mask modifications do not guarantee consistent effectiveness. Properly selected, sealed masks with a good fit overcome leakage, emphasizing their crucial role. Without evidence, mask-wearing may lead to unexpected infections. Education based on quantitative data is crucial for preventing adverse outcomes.

Early-Phase Perceptions of COVID-19's Impact on Ophthalmology Practice Patterns: A Survey from the Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical practice worldwide due to interventions to prevent spreading. Its effect on ophthalmology practices in Latin America has not yet been explored. We aimed to assess the perceptions about the pandemic from countries' ophthalmological national and subspecialty retina societies affiliated to the Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology (PAAO).

Patients and Methods

A survey-based study of leaders of national ophthalmological and retinal societies was conducted. The survey was sent by email to 30 societies, from which 20 responded (12 countries, 66.6% response rate). It included closed- and open-ended questions about (1) operational capacity and precautions, (2) telemedicine and virtual care, (3) procedures, and (4) post-pandemic considerations.

Results

There was a marked decline in ophthalmology patient visits (80-95%) and elective surgeries (90%) during 2020 compared to before the pandemic. Precautions like temperature checks, mask usage, and social distancing were widely implemented while personal protective equipment (PPE) availability varied. Telemedicine use was limited due to lack of experience with it. Reopening plans focused on maintaining precautions and gradually resuming activities. Economic and security concerns were raised, and adherence to guidelines was emphasized. Respondents acknowledged the need to adapt to a "new normal". Long duration drugs, fewer imaging studies, and shorter wait times were preferred; however, availability of long duration drugs was limited.

Conclusion

The pandemic impacted ophthalmology in Latin America, with reduced patient visits, procedures, and surgeries. Delayed treatment and complications were likely the result of the pandemic.