Risk Factors for Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Organ Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVE

Studies suggest that transplant patients are at risk for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, there is limited information in the literature regarding frequency and reasons for failure of adequate medical therapy. We aim to determine the risk factors associated with the development of medically recalcitrant CRS requiring endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Mayo Clinic.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of 925 transplant recipients seen at Mayo Clinic between 2017 and 2022.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

(1) a rhinologic consultation after transplant and (2) clinical diagnosis of CRS. A total of 549 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided based on the need for ESS versus successful treatment with medical therapy. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors and predictive variables related to failure of medical therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 549 patients, 201/549 (37%) had medically recalcitrant disease requiring ESS, while 348/549 (63%) were successfully treated with medical therapy Based on logistic regression, patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis in the pretransplant period were 8.68 more likely to have a recalcitrant disease (95% confidence interval, 3.72-20.28, p < 0.0001). Some of the largest determinants of medical therapy failure in the posttransplant period were CRS with nasal polyps, odontogenic CRS, and noninvasive fungal sinusitis. The presence of neutropenia, aplastic anemia, and living transplant were also associated with medically recalcitrant CRS requiring ESS.

CONCLUSION

Our predictive model identifies with high accuracy the patients who may be at risk of developing recalcitrant CRS in the organ transplant population.

Management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation: A comprehensive review

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Advances in the development of more effective immunosuppressive drugs have increased graft survival and drug induced adverse effects. Haematological complications including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia are common side effects that affect the grafts' and patients' outcomes. Several studies have stated the important role of various medications in haematological complications after transplantation. They have reported the incidence and different mechanisms of drug induced cytopenia, as well as an overview of possible treatment modalities. However, there is no comprehensive protocol for the management of these complications following transplantation. This narrative review was performed to develop a comprehensive practical approach for management of drug induced haematological complications following solid organ transplantation.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google scholar databases were searched without time limitations until March, 2021. In addition, some valid drug information data bases (Uptodate and Micromedex) were searched for detailed information until October, 2021.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Several immunosuppressive and antimicrobial medications may induce neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or anaemia following transplantation. Most of these agents cause dose-related cytopenia, which resolves with dose reduction or drug withdrawal. However, any change in medications may result in negative consequences such as severe infections, bleeding, cardiovascular complications, acute allograft rejection, and graft or patient loss. Thus, cautious evaluation of the patient's condition and the pharmacological properties of the culprit medication are required.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Three algorithms are presented to guide healthcare providers in the stepwise management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation.

Post-Transplantation Anemia and Risk of Death Following Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Post-transplantation anemia (PTA) is frequent among solid organ transplant recipients and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, the prevalence and impact of PTA in lung transplant recipients is still not elucidated.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult Danish lung transplant recipients between January 2010 and December 2019. The prevalence and severity of PTA were determined during the first three years post-transplantation. Associations between PTA and selected risk factors were established using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 278 patients were included. At one and three years post-lung transplantation the prevalence of PTA was 75% and 52%, respectively. Male sex was associated with increased odds of PTA at all time points (aOR ranging from 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.6, P = 0.02 to 5.9, 95% CI 2.6-14, P < .001). Cystic fibrosis was also associated with anemia at one-year post-transplantation (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-17, P = 0.03). We found no strong associations between PTA and renal function or viral infections. Excess mortality in recipients with moderate or severe anemia compared to patients with mild or no anemia was borderline statistically significant at one-year post-lung transplantation (aHR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9-4.4, P = 0.07).

DISCUSSION

Post-transplantation anemia is very common in Danish lung transplant recipients. Male sex and cystic fibrosis are independent risk factors for development of anemia. Further investigation on PTA, the underlying mechanisms, and its clinical impact is needed.

Anesthetic Considerations in Transplant Recipients for Nontransplant Surgery

As solid organ transplantation increases and patient survival improves, it will become more common for these patients to present for nontransplant surgery. Recipients may present with medical problems unique to the transplant, and important considerations are necessary to keep the transplanted organ functioning. A comprehensive preoperative examination with specific focus on graft functioning is required, and the anesthesiologist needs pay close attention to considerations of immunosuppressive regimens, blood product administration, and the risk benefits of invasive monitoring in these immunosuppressed patients. This article reviews the posttransplant physiology and anesthetic considerations for patients after solid organ transplantation.

Clinical approach to kidney disease in kidney recipients in Spain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the present study, clinical criteria used by Spanish nephrologists when approaching chronic kidney disease (CKD) in kidney recipients, as well as their level of maintenance and control of renal function, were evaluated.

METHODS

An epidemiological, observational, multicenter, nation-wide, prospective study was carried out, with a 6-month follow-up period. Three hundred and sixty-eight adult patients with stage3 kidney disease after a 24-month or longer post-transplantation follow-up period were included. Visits schedule included a retrospective visit, a baseline visit, an optional mid-term visit, and a final visit at month6.

RESULTS

Mean time since kidney transplantation was 8.2±5.4years. Most common pre-transplant cardiovascular risk factors were high blood pressure (80.2%), followed by high cholesterol levels (61.7%). Serum creatinine levels showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline visit to 6-month visit (0.06±0.22; P<.0001), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction was -1.03±6.14 (P=0.0014). Significant independent prognostic factors for GFR worsening were: higher 24-hour proteinuria (OR=1.001 per mg; P=.020), longer time since transplantation (OR=1.009 per month; P=.017), and lower hemoglobin levels (OR=1.261 per g/dl; P=.038). Donor age also had some negative influence (OR=1.021 per year; P=.106). Biopsies were obtained in only 8% of kidney transplant recipients with stage 3 CKD with an intervention being carried out in 25.4% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary markers and factors resulting in CKD progression, particularly anemia, are still frequently uncontrolled after kidney transplantation. Only about 2% of patients benefit from a therapeutic intervention based on a biopsy. Clinical perception differs from objective measures, which results in an obvious clinical inertia regarding risk factor control in such patients.

Blood disorders after kidney transplantation

Post transplant anemia (PTA) is a common issue in kidney transplant recipients. Most importantly it is associated with an impaired allograft function. Other important factors associated with PTA are immunosuppressive drugs (MPA, AZA and SRL), iron deficiency, infections (Parvo B19), older donor age, rejection episodes, an increased inflammatory state, and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. As there are no adequately powered RCTs in the kidney transplant population on anemia treatment with ESA, we have to rely on what we know from the large RCTs in the CKD population. The recently published KDIGO guidelines do not recommend treatment with ESA if Hb is >10 g/dl. Repletion of iron stores is emphasized. Post transplant leukopenia (PTL) and thrombocytopenia (PTT) are frequent complications especially in the first six months after kidney transplantation. Myelosuppression caused by immunosuppressive agents (MPA, AZA, SRL, rATG), antimicrobial drugs (VGCV), and CMV infection is the predominant cause. There are no widely accepted guidelines on treatment strategies, but most often dose reduction or discontinuation of causative medication is done. Most clinicians tend to decrease MPA dose, but this is eventually associated with an increase in acute rejection episodes. VGCV dose reduction (preemptive treatment instead of CMV prophylaxis) may be a successful strategy. In severe cases G-CSF treatment is an important management option and seems to be safe.