IL-15 enhances cross-reactive antibody recall responses to seasonal H3 influenza viruses in vitro

Influenza vaccination-induced H3 stalk-reactive memory B-cell clone expansion

Current vaccine formulations elicit a recall immune response against viruses by targeting epitopes on the globular head of hemagglutinin (HA), and stalk-reactive antibodies are rarely found. However, stalk-specific memory B-cell expansion after influenza vaccination is poorly understood. In this study, B cells were isolated from individuals immunized with seasonal tetravalent influenza vaccines at days 0 and 28 for H7N9 stimulation in vitro. Plasma and supernatants were collected for the analysis of anti-HA IgG using ELISA and a Luminex assay. Memory B cells were positively enriched, and total RNA was extracted for B cell receptor (BCR) H-CDR3 sequencing. All subjects displayed increased anti-H3 antibody secretion after vaccination, whereas no increase in cH5/3-reactive IgG levels was detected. The number of shared memory B-cell clones among individuals dropped dramatically from 593 to 37. Four out of 5 subjects displayed enhanced frequencies of the VH3-23 and VH3-30 genes, and one exhibited an increase in the frequency of VH1-18, which are associated with the stalk of HA. An increase in H3 stalk-specific antibodies produced by B cells stimulated with H7N9 viruses was detected after vaccination. These results demonstrated that H3 stalk-specific memory B cells can expand and secrete antibodies that bind to the stalk in vitro, although no increase in serum H3 stalk-reactive antibodies was found after vaccination, indicating potential for developing a universal vaccine strategy.

Anamnestic broadly reactive antibodies induced by H7N9 virus more efficiently bind to seasonal H3N2 strains

The very first influenza virus exposure in a human during infancy is known to imprint the host immune system. However, it is unclear how the memory B cells that first target virus epitopes affect antibody response to the stalk of hemagglutinin (HA) domain of influenza virus. Our study is designed to measure the cross-reactivity of antibodies induced by inactivated H7N9 virus using isolated human peripheral blood B cells. Most of the participants displayed higher levels of plasma IgG against the seasonal strains A/Vic11 and A/Cali09 than those binding to historical outbreak A/HK68 and A/PR8. H3 stalk-binding antibodies were detected in plasma at a 1:5000 dilution in 12 of 13 donors, H1 stalk-binding antibodies in all donors, indicating the existence of H3 and H1 stalk-reactive memory B cells. A moderate to high level of broadly cross-reactive antibodies was induced in memory B cells from all donors after in vitro stimulation of B cells with H7N9 virus. H3 stalk-binding antibodies were also detected in most subjects, with cross-reactivity to H1 and H7 stalk domains. The stalk-reactive antibodies bound to five H3 strains spanning 45 years and different H1, H2, H3, H5, H6, H7, H9 and B strains. Interestingly, H1- and H3-reactive IgG were much higher than H7-binding antibodies after 6 days of H7N9 stimulation. Our results demonstrate that HA stalk-reactive antibodies induced by H7N9 viruses more efficiently bound to yearly circulating both H3N2 and H1N1 strains than the boosting strain, indicating that HA stalk immunological imprint can be extended across currently circulating strains or vaccines.

Antibody Mediated Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and Human Coronaviruses: Multiplex Beads Assay and Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling to Generate Immune Repertoire Cartography

The COVID-19 pandemic is caused by SARS-CoV-2, a novel zoonotic coronavirus. Emerging evidence indicates that preexisting humoral immunity against other seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoVs) plays a critical role in the specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. However, current work to assess the effects of preexisting and cross-reactive anti-HCoVs antibodies has been limited. To address this issue, we have adapted our previously reported multiplex assay to simultaneously and quantitatively measure anti-HCoV antibodies. The full mPlex-CoV panel covers the spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins of three highly pathogenic HCoVs (SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, MERS) and four human seasonal strains (OC43, HKU1, NL63, 229E). Combining this assay with volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), we measured the anti-HCoV IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies in fingerstick blood samples. The results demonstrate that the mPlex-CoV assay has high specificity and sensitivity. It can detect strain-specific anti-HCoV antibodies down to 0.1 ng/ml with 4 log assay range and with low intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (%CV). We also estimate multiple strain HCoVs IgG, IgA and IgM concentration in VAMS samples in three categories of subjects: pre-COVID-19 (n=21), post-COVID-19 convalescents (n=19), and COVID-19 vaccine recipients (n=14). Using metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis, HCoVs IgG concentrations in fingerstick blood samples were well separated between the pre-COVID-19, post-COVID-19 convalescents, and COVID-19 vaccine recipients. In addition, we demonstrate how multi-dimensional scaling analysis can be used to visualize IgG mediated antibody immunity against multiple human coronaviruses. We conclude that the combination of VAMS and the mPlex-Cov assay is well suited to performing remote study sample collection under pandemic conditions to monitor HCoVs antibody responses in population studies.

Application of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) to measure multidimensional anti-influenza IgG antibodies by the mPlex-Flu assay

Introduction: Recently, volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has been used for accurate sampling of a fixed peripheral blood volume (10 µL) on a volumetric swab, and long-term sample storage. The mPlex-Flu assay is a novel, high-throughput assay that simultaneously measures the concentration of antibodies against the hemagglutinin (HA) proteins from multiple influenza virus strains with ≤5 µL of serum. Here we describe combining these two methods to measure multidimensional anti-influenza IgG activity in whole blood samples collected by a finger stick and VAMS, with correction for serum volume based on simultaneous hemoglobin measurement. Methods: We compared capillary blood samples obtained from a finger stick using a VAMS device with serum samples collected by traditional phlebotomy from 20 subjects, with the influenza antibody profiles measured by the mPlex-Flu assay. Results: We found that results with the two sampling methods were highly correlated within subjects and across all influenza strains (mean R 2 = 0.9470). Adjustment for serum volume, based on hemaglobin measurement, was used to estimate serum volume of samples and improved the accuracy. IgG measurements were stable over 3 weeks when VAMS samples were stored at room temperature or transported using a variety of shipping methods. Additionally, when volunteers performed finger-stick VAMS at-home by themselves, the comparison results of anti-HA antibody concentrations were highly consistent with sampling performed by study personnel on-site (R 2 = 0.9496). Conclusions: This novel approach can provide a simple, accurate, and low-cost means for monitoring the IgG anti-influenza HA antibody responses in large population studies and clinical trials.

A Complex Dance: Measuring the Multidimensional Worlds of Influenza Virus Evolution and Anti-Influenza Immune Responses

The human antibody response to influenza virus infection or vaccination is as complicated as it is essential for protection against flu. The constant antigenic changes of the virus to escape human herd immunity hinder the yearly selection of vaccine strains since it is hard to predict which virus strains will circulate for the coming flu season. A "universal" influenza vaccine that could induce broad cross-influenza subtype protection would help to address this issue. However, the human antibody response is intricate and often obscure, with factors such as antigenic seniority or original antigenic sin (OAS), and back-boosting ensuring that each person mounts a unique immune response to infection or vaccination with any new influenza virus strain. Notably, the effects of existing antibodies on cross-protective immunity after repeated vaccinations are unclear. More research is needed to characterize the mechanisms at play, but traditional assays such as hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) and microneutralization (MN) are excessively limited in scope and too resource-intensive to effectively meet this challenge. In the past ten years, new multiple dimensional assays (MDAs) have been developed to help overcome these problems by simultaneously measuring antibodies against a large panel of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) proteins with a minimal amount of sample in a high throughput way. MDAs will likely be a powerful tool for accelerating the study of the humoral immune response to influenza vaccination and the development of a universal influenza vaccine.

Continuous Readout versus Titer-Based Assays of Influenza Vaccine Trials: Sensitivity, Specificity, and False Discovery Rates

The current gold standard for measuring antibody-based immunity to influenza viruses relies on the hemagglutinin inhibition assay (HAI), an 80-year-old technology, and the microneutralization assay (MN). Both assays use serial dilution to provide a discrete, ranked readout of 8-14 categorical titer values for each sample. In contrast to other methods of measuring vaccine antibody levels that produce a continuous readout (i.e., mPLEX-Flu and ELISA), titering methods introduce imprecision and increase false discovery rates (FDR). In this paper, we assess the degree of such statistical errors, first with simulation studies comparing continuous data with titer data in influenza vaccine study group comparison analyses and then by analyzing actual sample data from an influenza vaccine trial. Our results show the superiority of using continuous, rather than discrete, readout assays. Compared to continuous readout assays, titering assays have a lower statistical precision and a higher FDR. The results suggested that traditional titering assays could lead to increased Type-II errors in the comparison of different therapeutic arms of an influenza vaccine trial. These statistical issues are related to the mathematical nature of titer-based assays, which we examine in detail in the simulation studies. Continuous readout assays are free of this issue, and thus it is possible that comparisons of study groups could provide different results with these two methods as we have shown in our case study.