T4 Colon Cancer - Current Management

Comparative analysis of toxicity in patients with anal cancer undergoing definitive simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) or sequential integrated boost (SeqB) radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant chemotherapy (CHT) in patients (pts) with anal cancer treated with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) versus sequential boost (SeqB).

METHODS

Sixty-six patients were treated from 2007 to 2021. Thirty patients underwent to SeqB concurrent to CHT and 37 to SIB-group. Toxicity assessment has been considered in acute and in late toxicities for gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), cutaneous (CU) districts, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 5.0. The Wexner scale among summary scoring systems has been used as a tool to measure fecal incontinence. The chi-square test for ordinal variables were used to evaluate the association between patient and treatment characteristics and acute or late severe toxicity. Univariable logistic regression models were fit to evaluate predictive factors associated with fecal incontinence.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 61.5 months (IQR, 27.1-121.7 months) for all patients. Severe acute toxicity (≥ G2) was observed in 49 patients (74.2%). Late toxicity (≥ G2) occurred in 13 cases (19.6%). In assessment of cutaneous toxicity, there was also a significant reduction in ≥ G1 in SIB group with 29 patients (80.5%) vs SeqB group with 29 patients (96.6%) (p-value = 0.046). Of both groups 11 patients (16.6%) developed fecal incontinence, 8 (22%) in the SIB group and 3 (10%) in the SeqB.

CONCLUSION

SIB for anal cancer treatment results in reduced acute and late cutaneous toxicity compared to SeqB. According to our results the rate of other acute and late toxicities are low and comparable between the two groups.

The use of laparoscopy for T4a and T4b colon cancer: are we playing with fire?

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic approach for colon cancer has become widely accepted. However, its safety for T4 tumors, and particularly for T4b tumors when local invasion to adjacent structures occurs, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare short and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic vs. open resection for T4a and T4b colon cancers.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained, single-institution database was queried to identify patients with pathological stage T4a and T4b colon adenocarcinomas electively operated on between 2000 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of laparoscopy. Patient characteristics, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen patients [41 laparoscopic (L), 78 open surgeries (O)] met the inclusion criteria. No difference was observed in age, gender, BMI, ASA, and procedure between groups. Tumors treated by L were smaller than O (p = 0.003). No difference was observed in morbidity, mortality, reoperation, or readmission between the groups. Length of hospital stay was shorter in L than O (6 vs. 9 days, p = 0.005). Conversion to open was necessary in 22% of all T4 tumors laparoscopic cases. However, when tumors were subdivided by pT4 classification, conversion was necessary for 4 of 34 (12%) pT4a patients vs. 5 of 7 (71%) pT4b patients (p = 0.003). In the pT4b cohort (n = 37), more tumors were treated by the open approach (30 vs. 7). For pT4b tumors, the R0 resection rate was 94% (86% in L vs. 97% in O, p = 0.249). The use of laparoscopy did not impact overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or tumor recurrence overall in all T4 or T4a and T4b tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed in pT4 tumors with similar oncologic outcomes as compared to open surgery. However, for pT4b tumors, the conversion rate is very high. The open approach may be preferable.

Chemotherapy exacerbates the survival paradox of colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Colon cancer is one of the most common tumor diseases in the world. Currently, clinicians usually evaluate the survival and prognosis of patients according to their tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. However, current studies have found that there is a certain survival paradox in TNM staging.

Methods

In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, patients diagnosed with colon cancer by surgical pathology from 2004 to 2011 were selected for analysis of 5-year overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to analyze the difference in survival between different stages and the effect of chemotherapy on prognosis.

Results

The OS of stage IIIA colon cancer sufferers was significantly superior to stage IIB/IIC and separate stage IIB or IIC colon cancer patients before and after PSM analysis (P<0.05 for all). Moreover, the difference in survival was more significant when stage IIB/IIC patients were compared with stage IIIA patients with chemotherapy.

Conclusions

The survival paradox existed both in all stage IIB/IIC patients, or individual stage IIB or IIC patients compared with stage IIIA sufferers, and the survival paradox between stage IIIA and stage IIC was more obvious. Moreover, chemotherapy had a positive effect on the prognosis of patients with stage IIIA, IIC and IIB in this study. Chemotherapy exacerbates the survival paradox of colon cancer, even if it is not the cause of the survival paradox.

Understanding the Philosophy, Anatomy, and Surgery of the Extra-TME Plane of Locally Advanced and Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer; Single Institution Experience with International Benchmarking

Simple Summary

Worldwide there is still unwarranted variation in peri-operative management and subsequently oncological outcome following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The major contributing factor seems to be a difference in treatment strategy with many centres aiming for more neoadjuvant treatment and less radical surgery. However, a radical resection with clear operative margins remains the single most important prognostic factor for survival and therefore an aggressive, radical approach is justified for an optimal oncological outcome and remains the gold standard of care.

Abstract

Pelvic exenteration surgery has become a widely accepted procedure for treatment of locally advanced (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, there is still unwarranted variation in peri-operative management and subsequently oncological outcome after this procedure. In this article we will elaborate on the various reasons for the observed differences based on benchmarking results of our own data to the data from the PelvEx collaborative as well as findings from 2 other benchmarking studies. Our main observation was a significant difference in extent of resection between exenteration units, with our unit performing more complete soft tissue exenterations, sacrectomies and extended lateral compartment resections than most other units, resulting in a higher R0 rate and longer overall survival. Secondly, current literature shows there is a tendency to use more neoadjuvant treatment such as re-irradiation and total neoadjuvant treatment and perform less radical surgery. However, peri-operative chemotherapy or radiotherapy should not be a substitute for adequate radical surgery and an R0 resection remains the gold standard. Finally, we describe our experiences with standardizing our surgical approaches to the various compartments and the achieved oncological and functional outcomes.

Current Perspectives on the Importance of Pathological Features in Prognostication and Guidance of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer

There is not a clear consensus on which pathological features and biomarkers are important in guiding prognosis and adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. The Pathology in Colon Cancer, Prognosis and Uptake of Adjuvant Therapy (PiCC UP) Australia and New Zealand questionnaire was distributed to colorectal surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists after institutional board approval. The aim of this study was to understand current specialist attitudes towards pathological features in the prognostication of colon cancer and adjuvant therapy in stage II disease. A 5-scale Likert score was used to assess attitudes towards 23 pathological features for prognosis and 18 features for adjuvant therapy. Data were analysed using a rating scale and graded response model in item response theory (IRT) on STATA (Stata MP, version 15; StataCorp LP). One hundred and sixty-four specialists (45 oncologists, 86 surgeons and 33 pathologists) participated. Based on IRT modelling, the most important pathological features for prognosis in colon cancer were distant metastases, lymph node metastases and liver metastases. Other features seen as important were tumour rupture, involved margin, radial margin, CRM, lymphovascular invasion and grade of differentiation. Size of tumour, location, lymph node ratio and EGFR status were considered less important. The most important features in decision making for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer were tumour rupture, lymphovascular invasion and microsatellite instability. BRAF status, size of tumour, location, tumour budding and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes were factored as lesser importance. Biomarkers such as CDX2, EGFR, KRAS and BRAF status present areas for further research to improve precision oncology. This study provides the most current status on the importance of pathological features in prognostication and recommendations for adjuvant therapy in Australia and New Zealand. Results of this nationwide study may be useful to help in guiding prognosis and adjuvant treatment in colon cancer.

Pathological Features and Prognostication in Colorectal Cancer

The prognostication of colorectal cancer (CRC) has traditionally relied on staging as defined by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging classifications. However, clinically, there appears to be differences in survival patterns independent of stage, suggesting a complex interaction of stage, pathological features, and biomarkers playing a role in guiding prognosis, risk stratification, and guiding neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. Histological features such as tumour budding, perineural invasion, apical lymph node involvement, lymph node yield, lymph node ratio, and molecular features such as MSI, KRAS, BRAF, and CDX2 may assist in prognostication and optimising adjuvant treatment. This study provides a comprehensive review of the pathological features and biomarkers that are important in the prognostication and treatment of CRC. We review the importance of pathological features and biomarkers that may be important in colorectal cancer based on the current evidence in the literature.

A Systematic Review of the Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Preoperative Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy

The main objective of this systematic review is to investigate the expression level of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in rectal cancer treated with either preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. In addition, we have summarized the effects of preoperative treatment of rectal cancer with regards to the expression levels of COX-2. A systematic literature review was performed in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases on 1 January 2021 with the usage of the following search string-(cyclooxygenase-2) OR (COX-2) AND (rectal cancer) AND (preoperative radiochemotherapy) OR (preoperative radiotherapy). Among the 176 included in the analysis, only 13 studies were included for data extraction with a total number of 2095 patients. The results of the analysis are based on the articles concerning the expression of COX-2 in rectal cancer among patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. A COX-2 expression is an early event involved in rectal cancer development. In cases of negative COX-2 expression, radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy might contribute to the reduction of a local recurrence. Therefore, COX-2 may be considered as a biologic factor while selecting patients for more effective, less time-consuming and less expensive preoperative treatment. However, the utility of the administration of COX-2 inhibitors to patients with COX-2 overexpression, in an attempt to improve the patients' response rate to the neoadjuvant treatment, needs an assessment in further clinical trials.

Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study

Background

Programs of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery reduces morbidity and shorten recovery in patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer. Patients presenting with more advanced disease such as T4 cancers are frequently excluded from undergoing ERAS programs due to the difficulty in applying established protocols. The primary aim of this investigation was to evaluate the possibility of applying a validated ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colorectal resection for T4 colon and rectal cancer and to evaluate the short-term outcome.

Methods

Single-center, retrospective cohort study. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of stage T4 colorectal cancer undergoing surgery between November 2016 and January 2020 were treated following the institutional fast track protocol without exclusion. Short-term postoperative outcomes were compared to those of a control group treated with conventional care and that underwent surgical resection for T4 colorectal cancer at the same institution from January 2010 to October 2016. Data from both groups were collected retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database.

Results

Eighty-two patients were diagnosed with T4 cancer, 49 patients were included in the ERAS cohort and 33 in the historical conventional care cohort. Both, the mean time of tolerance to solid food diet and postoperative length of stay were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (3.14 ± 1.76 vs 4.8 ± 1.52; p < 0.0001 and 6.93 ± 3.76 vs 9.50 ± 4.83; p = 0.0084 respectively). No differences in perioperative complications were observed.

Conclusions

Results from this cohort study from a single-center registry support the thesis that the adoption of the ERAS protocol is effective and applicable in patients with colorectal cancer clinically staged T4, reducing significantly their length of stay and time of tolerance to solid food diet, without affecting surgical postoperative outcomes.

ERCC overexpression associated with a poor response of cT4b colorectal cancer with FOLFOX-based neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation

Colorectal cancer (CRC) of the clinical tumor stage T4b (cT4b) refers to advanced tumors with direct invasion of adjacent structures and the tumors are considered unresectable. Despite advancements in aggressive surgery and combination chemotherapy, the prognosis of cT4b CRC remains poor. Optimizing the therapeutic sequence administered to patients with cT4b CRC to improve clinical outcomes is crucial. In the present study, patients with unresectable cT4b and nodal stage N1-2 CRC were investigated at a single institution. A total of 20 consecutive patients were treated with pre-operative concurrent chemoradiation by using 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) since February 2015 and were regularly followed up until March 2020. Due to their poor response to concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) with FOLFOX, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as the second-line neoadjuvant treatment. Genetic alterations, such as microsatellite instability (MSI), were documented, and the expression levels of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and ERCC2 were examined. Of the 20 patients, the tumors of 14 patients (70%) became resectable after FOLFIRI administration. The median duration between the last date of radiotherapy and surgery was 32.7 weeks (range, 10.1–59.3 weeks). Of note, 4 of the 14 patients with resectable tumors (28.6%) achieved a pathologic complete response. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 27.5 months (range, 12–39 months) and 27.5 months (range, 8–39 months), respectively. The cancerous specimens of all of the patients (100%) exhibited ERCC2 overexpression and 18 specimens (90%) had ERCC1 overexpression. Only one tumor (5%) exhibited high MSI. The present study indicated that ERCC overexpression associated with the poor response of FOLFOX-based CCRT and FOLFIRI after FOLFOX-based CCRT failure may have a potential role in conversion to resectable tumors by neoadjuvant treatment in cT4b CRC. However, a further prospective study with more patients is required to improve the precision of the conclusions.