Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) gained relevance in research and clinical practice in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. The physical discomfort and social and psychological consequences of this food-related disease substantially affect HRQOL. Determinant of an impaired HRQOL include symptom severity, disease duration, biological disease activity, and psychological factors. Patients prioritize symptom relief and improved HRQOL as treatment objectives. Available treatment options can address these goals; however, there is a suboptimal adherence to treatment. There is a need for enhanced patient guidance and education. The assessment of HRQOL will help to prioritize patient's needs in management.

Number of bottles of esophageal biopsies in the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The number of bottles of esophageal biopsies needed for the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is unclear, despite cost differences.

AIMS

Assess the clinical outcomes between patients with one and two bottles of esophageal biopsies for the assessment of EoE.

METHODS

Retrospective study of adults who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for esophageal symptoms between January 2015 and June 2021 and findings of ≥15 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf). Patients with one bottle (1 bottle-EoE) had biopsies from the entire or proximal esophagus. Patients with two bottles had biopsies separated from the distal and proximal esophagus and were separated into those with ≥ 15 eos/hpf in both bottles (2 bottle Dif-EoE), or the distal bottle alone (2 bottle Lim-EoE). The primary outcomes were endoscopic findings at follow-up EGD as assessed by the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) and the presence of ≥15 eos/hpf.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients with esophageal eosinophilia who met inclusion criteria, 49 had 2 bottle Dif-EoE, 18 had 2 bottle Lim-EoE, and 18 had 1 bottle-EoE. At median follow-up of 3.3-5.6 months, more patients with 1 bottle EoE had dysphagia (p = 0.029), however there were no differences in the EREFS (p = 0.14) or presence of ≥15 eos/hpf (p = 0.39). More patients with 2 bottle Dif-EoE were treated with topical steroids (16.3% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.039) and diet (20.4% vs. 0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic and histologic outcomes were similar in patients who had one and two bottles for esophageal biopsies in the evaluation of EoE.

Clinical Features of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Single Center Experience in Ecuador

PURPOSE

Data on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in South America is scarce. Moreover, no studies are available in Ecuador. We evaluated the clinical, endoscopic, and histological characteristics of Ecuadorian children with EoE.

METHODS

Medical records of 2,711 children who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) between 2009 and 2020 at Hospital Metropolitano de Quito, Ecuador were reviewed. Esophageal mucosal biopsies were obtained from 72 patients and the features of 35 children with EoE were described. EoE was diagnosed when there were more than 15 eosinophils in the esophagus, per high power field.

RESULTS

EoE was diagnosed in 35 children (9.4±4.5 years) with a male predominance (74%). Abdominal pain (51.4%) and vomiting (31.4%) were dominant symptoms. A history of allergic diseases was noted in 47.1% of the children, which mainly included allergic rhinitis (37.1%) and atopic dermatitis (11.4%). The most common endoscopic findings were furrowing (82.9%) and edema (74.3%). All patients were initially treated with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). Those who did not respond to PPIs received steroids (5.7%) and diet therapy (5.7%), and five patients were referred to an allergist. Clinical and histological resolution was observed in 65% of the patients who underwent a second UGE after 6-8 weeks of PPI.

CONCLUSION

Our study describes the clinical features of pediatric EoE in Ecuador. This is the first retrospective study in Ecuador that describes the clinical, endoscopic, and histological manifestations of EoE in a small pediatric population. Almost half of the children who underwent a biopsy had EoE.

Novel Questionnaires for Assessing Signs and Symptoms of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) experience heterogeneous symptoms and the patient's age may preclude reliable self-report of symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to develop a patient-reported outcome and an observer-reported outcome questionnaire to evaluate the signs and symptoms of EoE in pediatric patients (≥1 to <12 y of age) in a clinical trial setting.

METHODS

A concept-focused literature review, expert advice meetings, and concept elicitation interviews with pediatric EoE patients and their caregivers were conducted to identify disease-related signs and symptoms. Instructions, items, and response options were drafted. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to evaluate children's and caregivers' ability to understand and respond to the questionnaires and to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the concepts measured.

RESULTS

Results from the literature review, expert advice meetings (n = 6), and concept elicitation interviews (n = 24) informed the development of the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Sign/Symptom Questionnaire intended for use by patients (PESQ-P) with EoE 8 years or older to younger than 12 years and an observer-reported outcome questionnaire planned for use by caregivers of patients (PESQ-C) 1 year old or older to younger than 12 years. Both questionnaires measure the same concepts; the PESQ-P assesses the frequency, duration, and/or severity of symptoms and the PESQ-C assesses the presence/absence of the signs/symptoms. The cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 17) demonstrated that participants were able to comprehend and complete the questionnaires as intended.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of the content validity of 2 novel questionnaires, PESQ-P and PESQ-C, designed to evaluate the symptom experience of pediatric EoE patients in a clinical trial setting.

High-Resolution Esophageal Manometric Features in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background and Aims

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated esophageal disease characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. The aims of our study included (1) to assess esophageal motility patterns of EoE by topographic analysis of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and (2) to establish a relationship between symptoms of EoE and motility abnormalities seen on HRM.

Methods

A retrospective study in which all adult patients over 18 years of age with EoE diagnosed by endoscopy and histology and who underwent HRM were included in the study during the study period. Motility patterns in patients with EoE under HRM were analyzed. Data were presented as frequencies and percentages with inference by Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

Seven hundred patients diagnosed with EoE were noted, and of these, 38 patients had undergone esophageal HRM. Fifty-eight percent of these patients were noted to have an esophageal motility abnormality on HRM. Thirty-seven percent of the patients showed absent peristalsis with pan-esophageal pressurization but normal integrate relaxation pressure; 21% of the patients showed peristaltic dysfunction; and 42% of the patients had a normal HRM. Seventy-one percent of the patients with pan-esophageal pressurization presented with food impaction requiring endoscopy for disimpaction and esophageal dilation (P = .015).

Conclusion

The most common abnormality noted was aperistalsis with pan-esophageal pressurization. This abnormality correlated with the clinical presentation of bolus impaction requiring an endoscopic intervention (P = .015).

Pharmacotherapies in eosinophilic esophagitis: state of the art

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated esophageal disease with a Th2 inflammatory response to inhalant and food allergens that cause an eosinophilic infiltration of esophageal mucosa. The diagnosis requires an upper endoscopy with esophageal bioptic samples, in particular the number of eosinophils must be >15 eos/high power field. The main symptoms of EoE in adults are dysphagia and food impaction, and its incidence is growing. Nowadays, the etiology of EoE is not well understood and no standard therapy is available. Therefore, the aim of this review was to analyze the major studies present in literature regarding the various therapeutic approaches to this disease.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis After an Allegra-D Bolus: A Case Report

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disorder that may be related to exposure to additive chemicals in crops, air pollutants, or supplements found within livestock. Co-occurring allergic or atopic diseases including atopic dermatitis, food allergies, and asthma are also commonly seen in 70% of cases and help guide diagnosis. Diagnosis of EoE requires eosinophilic infiltration greater than 15 eosinophils per high power field (HPF) with endoscopic evidence of abnormal esophageal changes. Here, we discuss a rare presentation of food bolus impaction secondary to EoE after ingestion of a nasal decongestant and antihistamine pill that has previously never been described in the literature.

A 22-year-old male with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of a sudden onset respiratory distress, regurgitation of clear oral secretions, and globus sensation post ingestion of a fexofenadine-pseudoephedrine tablet. Prior to intake of the capsule, the patient was consuming liquids and solids appropriately. The patient was afebrile, hypertensive at 172/114, and found to have a normal heart rate of 88 bpm and a respiration rate of 18 breaths per minute. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed, which revealed a fexofenadine-pseudoephedrine capsule at 23 cm from the incisors along with a superficial ulceration at the corresponding level in the esophagus. The foreign body was successfully removed using raptor forceps. Further visualization demonstrated trachealization of the esophagus and furrowing and severe narrowing (< 10mm), which raised suspicion for EoE. Proximal biopsy indicated 16 intraepithelial eosinophils per HPF within the squamous epithelium, likely compatible with EoE. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged on an eight-week course of proton-pump inhibitors.

EoE is defined as an immune-mediated esophageal disease characterized histologically by eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Our patient was reported to have up to 30 eosinophils per HPF from the proximal esophageal biopsy, which satisfies the requirements for an EoE diagnosis. Based on the current literature review, there have been no other reported cases of symptomatic food bolus impaction secondary to EoE after ingestion of antihistamines.

A case series of eosinophilic esophagitis and primary adrenal insufficiency

Although previously associated with secondary adrenal insufficiency and other autoimmune diseases, eosinophilic esophagitis has not been described in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency. In this case series, we describe three patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and primary adrenal insufficiency, including two patients with polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type 1. All patients experienced improvement in esophageal symptoms with treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The association between eosinophilic esophagitis and primary adrenal insufficiency is unclear, but may include underlying genetic predisposition and/or immune system dysregulation.

Duration of adhesion of swallowed alginates to distal oesophageal mucosa: implications for topical therapy of oesophageal diseases

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown, ex vivo, that alginate solutions can have a topical protective effect on oesophageal mucosal biopsies exposed to simulated gastric juice. Oesophageal mucosal impedance can measure the duration of mucosal adherence of ionic solutions since the impedance drops when the solution is present, and rises to baseline as the solution clears.

AIM

To investigate the in vivo duration of adhesion of swallowed alginate solution to distal oesophageal mucosa.

METHODS

We studied 20 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with heartburn. A pH-impedance catheter was inserted, and baseline distal channel oesophageal impedance measured. Healthy volunteers received 10 mL of either sodium alginate (Gaviscon Advance), Gaviscon placebo (no alginate) or viscous slurry (saline mixed with sucralose), given in a randomised, single-blinded order over three visits. Patients received either sodium alginate or placebo on two visits. Initial impedance drop was measured, then 1-minute mean impedance was measured each minute until ≥75% recovery to baseline.

RESULTS

In healthy volunteers, sodium alginate adhered to the oesophageal mucosa for longer than placebo or viscous slurry (10.4 [8.7] minutes vs 1.1 [1.6] vs 3.6 [4.0], P < 0.01). In patients, sodium alginate adhered to the oesophageal mucosa for longer than placebo (9.0 (5.4) vs 3.7 (4.1), P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium alginate solution adhered to the oesophageal mucosa for significantly longer than placebo or viscous slurry. This demonstrates that alginates could confer a protective benefit due to mucoadhesion and can be a basis for further development of topical protectants and for topical drug delivery in oesophageal disease.