Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck

Artificial intelligence technology improves the accuracy of preoperative planning in primary total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Successful total hip arthroplasty relies on accurate preoperative planning. However, the conventional preoperative planning, a two-dimensional method using X-ray template, has shown poor reliability of predicting component size. To our knowledge, artificial intelligence technology assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning is promising to improve the accuracy of preoperative planning but there is a dearth of clinical evidence. Therefore, in this study we compared the prediction accuracy of these two maneuvers.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study consisting of 117 consecutive patients who underwent a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty to compare the prediction accuracy of these two methods. The two-dimensional and artificial intelligence assisted three-dimensional planning results of the same patient were compared with the definitive implant size respectively.

RESULTS

The prediction accuracy of artificial intelligence assisted three-dimensional planning for cup and the stem sizes were 66.67% (78/117) and 65.81% (77/117), two-dimensional planning was 30.77% (36/117) and 37.61% (44/117) (p < 0.05). There were poor prediction results of two-dimensional planning in patients with hip dysplasia (p = 0.004, OR = 7.143) and excessive femoral anteversion (p = 0.012, OR = 1.052), meanwhile the failure risk of stem side two-dimensional planning increased as patients got older (p = 0.003, OR = 1.118). The accuracy of artificial intelligence assisted three-dimensional planning cannot be affected by above factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that artificial intelligence assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning showed higher accuracy and stability than two-dimensional preoperative planning in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. We believe artificial intelligence assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning technology provides surgeons a new reliable choice and offers advantages whether in simple or complicated cases.

The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a frequently performed procedure; the objective is restoration of native hip biomechanics and achieving functional range of motion (ROM) through precise positioning of the prosthetic components. Advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging and computed tomography (CT)-based navigation are valuable tools in both the preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. The aim of this study is to provide a thorough overview on the applications of CT scans in both the preoperative and intraoperative settings of primary THA. Preoperative planning using CT-based 3D imaging enables greater accuracy in prediction of implant sizes, leading to enhancement of surgical workflow with optimization of implant inventory. Surgeons can perform a more thorough assessment of posterior and anterior acetabular wall coverage, acetabular osteophytes, anatomical landmarks, and thus achieve more functional implant positioning. Intraoperative CT-based navigation can facilitate precise execution of the preoperative plan, to attain optimal positioning of the prosthetic components to avoid impingement. Medial reaming can be minimized preserving native bone stock, which can enable restoration of femoral, acetabular, and combined offsets. In addition, it is associated with greater accuracy in leg length adjustment, a critical factor in patients' postoperative satisfaction. Despite the higher costs and radiation exposure, which currently limits its widespread adoption, it offers many benefits, and the increasing interest in robotic surgery has facilitated its integration into routine practice. Conducting additional research on ultra-low-dose CT scans and examining the potential for translation of 3D imaging into improved clinical outcomes will be necessary to warrant its expanded application.

"Single-use peripheral" vs "conventional" reaming in total hip arthroplasty: how to respect native centre of rotation and acetabular offset? A CT study

PURPOSE

The respect of native hip offset represents a mainstay for satisfying results in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Historically, a great interest has been focused on restoration of femoral offset, while only in recent years, acetabular offset (AO) has been considered. The purpose of the current study was to compare the "single-use peripheral" reaming technique with the "conventional" one for the maintenance of the native COR of the hip and AO in patients undergoing to primary THA.

METHODS

Eighty patients affected from primary hip osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled in the study and were divided in two groups (Group A "single-use peripheral" and Group B "conventional" reaming technique). Pre- and post-operatively, AO, acetabular floor distance (AFd) and acetabular version (AV) were assessed through a CT scan. A comparison between groups for the radiological parameters, surgical time and complications was performed.

RESULTS

The demographic data were similar in both groups. The complications rate and the AV did not differ statistically between groups. Group A presented a statistically significant shorter surgical time and lower variation between pre- and post-operative AO and AFd. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The "single-use peripheral" reaming technique demonstrated to be more reliable in reproducing the native COR and AO of patients undergoing to primary THA than the "conventional" one. The operative time was significantly reduced, and it may lead to a reduction in the infection risk even though it was not observed in the current study. Further research could be useful to validate such findings and to assess clinical impact and long-term survival of the implant.

Accuracy of Personalized Computed Tomographic 3D Templating for Acetabular Cup Placement in Revision Arthroplasty

Background: Revision hip arthroplasty presents a surgical challenge, necessitating meticulous preoperative planning to avert complications like periprosthetic fractures and aseptic loosening. Historically, assessment of the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) templating has focused exclusively on primary hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined the accuracy of 3D templating for acetabular revision cups in 30 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Utilizing computed tomography scans of the patients' pelvis and 3D templates of the implants (Aesculap Plasmafit, B. Braun; Aesculap Plasmafit Revision, B. Braun; Avantage Acetabular System, Zimmerbiomet, EcoFit 2M, Implantcast; Tritanium Revision, Stryker), we performed 3D templating and positioned the acetabular cup implants accordingly. To evaluate accuracy, we compared the planned sizes of the acetabular cups in 2D and 3D with the sizes implanted during surgery. Results: An analysis was performed to examine potential influences on templating accuracy, specifically considering factors such as gender and body mass index (BMI). Significant statistical differences (p < 0.001) in the accuracy of size prediction were observed between 3D and 2D templating. Personalized 3D templating exhibited an accuracy rate of 66.7% for the correct prediction of the size of the acetabular cup, while 2D templating achieved an exact size prediction in only 26.7% of cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2D and 3D templating methods regarding gender or BMI. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 3D templating improves the accuracy of predicting acetabular cup sizes in revision arthroplasty when compared to 2D templating. However, it should be noted that the predicted implant size generated through 3D templating tended to overestimate the implanted implant size by an average of 1.3 sizes.

Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty for preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making

AIMS

This article aimed to explore the efficacy of robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) in improving preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, randomized clinical controlled trial, 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: conventional THA (cTHA) and robotic arm-assisted THA (rTHA). The rTHA underwent procedures using a robot-assisted surgical system, which generated three-dimensional models to determine the most appropriate prosthesis size and position. The standard process of replacement was executed in cTHA planned preoperatively via X-ray by experienced surgeons. Differences between predicted and actual prosthetic size, prosthetic position, and leg length were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study, but one patient was not allocated due to anemia. No significant preoperative baseline data difference was found between the two groups. The actual versus predicted implantation size of both groups revealed that 27/30 (90.0%) in the rTHA group and 25/29 (86.2%) in the cTHA group experienced complete coincidence. The coincidence rate for the femoral stem was higher in the rTHA group (83.3%) than that in the cTHA group (62.7%). Between the actual and predicted rTHA, the difference in anteversion/inclination degree (< 6°) was largely dispersed, while cTHA was more evenly distributed in degree (< 9°). The differences in leg length between the surgical side and contralateral side showed a significant deviation when comparing the two groups (P = 0.003), with 0.281 (- 4.17 to 3.32) mm in rTHA and 3.79 (1.45-6.42) mm in cTHA.

CONCLUSION

Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty can be valuable for preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making.

The role of 3-dimensional preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on artificial intelligence technology to different surgeons: A retrospective cohort study

Preoperative planning with computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensiona (3D) templating has been achieved precise placement of hip components. This study investigated the role of the software (3-dimensional preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty [THA] based on artificial intelligence technology, artificial intelligence hip [AIHIP]) for surgeons with different experience levels in primary THA. In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients, who had undergone THA with the help of the AIHIP, and matched to patients, who had undergone THA without the help of the AIHIP, by age and the doctor who operated on them. The subjects were divided into 4 groups, senior surgeon (Chief of Surgery) with AIHIP group, senior surgeon without AIHIP group, junior surgeon (Associate Chief of Surgery) with AIHIP group and junior surgeon without AIHIP group. The general data, imaging index, clinical outcomes and accuracy of stem size prediction and cup size prediction were retrospectively documented for all patients. There was a significant difference in discrepancy in leg length (P = .010), neck-shaft angle (P = .025) and femoral offset (P = .031) between the healthy side and the affected side, operation duration (P < .001), decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) per 24 hours (P = .046), intraoperative radiation exposure frequency (P < .050) and postoperative complications (overall P = .035) among the patients in junior surgeon group. No significant differences were found between senior surgeon groups with respect to discrepancy in leg length (P = .793), neck-shaft angle (P = .088)and femoral offset (P = .946) between the healthy side and the affected side, operation duration (P = .085), decrease in Hb per 24 hours (P = .952), intraoperative radiation exposure frequency (P = .094) and postoperative complications (overall P = .378). The stem sizes of 95% were accurately estimated to be within 1 stem size, and 97% of the cup size estimates were accurate to within 1 cup size in senior surgeon group with AIHIP. A total of 87% stem sizes were accurately estimated to be within 1 stem size, and 85% cup sizes were accurate to within 1 cup size in junior surgeon group with AIHIP. In conclusion, our study suggests that an AI-based preoperative 3D planning system for THA is a valuable adjunctive tool for junior doctor and should routinely be performed preoperatively.

The torsion of the proximal femur in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a 3-dimensional evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty has been widely studied but the horizontal plane was never considered, or only limited to the torsion of the femoral neck.

METHODS

Using CT-scan images from a group of 178 patients scheduled for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), we analysed the evolution of the torsion of the proximal femoral metaphysis, in reference to the posterior bicondylar plane of the femur. The evolution of the torsion, between 20 mm below the centre of the lesser trochanter and 20 mm above, was evaluated.

RESULTS

In cases of primary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and epiphysiolysis capitis femoris, the mean torsion decreased from 46° to 20° without significant differences in average values between the different diagnoses, but important individual variations were found. In the groups of dysplasia and congenital hip dislocation, the torsion values were significantly higher, decreasing in mean from 59° to 25° and 63° to 34° respectively, and with important individual variations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data are important when using cementless femoral stems, since an ideal fit-and-fill in the proximal femur zone has been shown to positively influence bone ingrowth of the stem. However, a strict adaptation of the stem to the medullary canal, without considering its torsion, can lead to an increased or decreased torsion of the prosthesis neck and thus to an instability of the arthroplasty. For these reasons, if a perfect adaptation of the stem to the intramedullary anatomy and an optimal reconstruction of the extramedullary anatomy are to be achieved, 3-dimensional planning should ideally be obtained for every patient. This will allow the best stem choice adapted to every single patient and every kind of anatomy.

Component Asymmetry in Bilateral Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

This study investigated the results of component asymmetry (CA) in bilateral cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

This study included 300 patients, who underwent bilateral cementless THA between April 2000 and December 2017. They were divided into the component symmetry (CS) and CA groups; CA group was sub-classified into acetabular component asymmetry (ACA) and femoral component asymmetry (FCA). Radiologic and clinical outcomes of the CA group were compared with those of the CS group.

Results

The incidence of CA was 25.7% (77/300 patients), including 55 patients with ACA, 34 patients with FCA, and 12 with both components asymmetric. The mean time interval between operations in the CA group was significantly longer than that in the CS group (p < 0.001). The mean differences in horizontal and vertical distances from teardrop to the center of rotation of the acetabular component between both hips in the ACA group were significantly larger than those in the CS group (p = 0.033 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean femoral component alignment angle difference between both hips was significantly larger in the FCA group than in the CS group (p < 0.001). The mean Harris Hip Score at last follow-up of the CA group was similar to that of the CS group.

Conclusions

CA in patients undergoing bilateral cementless THA was not rare, especially with a longer time interval between operations. Regardless of CA, when stable fixation of the components was achieved, satisfactory radiologic and clinical outcomes were obtained.

Pre-operative planning and templating with 3-D printed models for complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty

Background

Complex primary and revision THR requires comprehensive understanding of abnormal bony anatomy. Evaluation and classification of acetabular bone defects is essential to manage them appropriately. It is difficult to appreciate complex defects using conventional 2-Dimensional radiological modalities. 3D printed models can provide both visual and tactile reproduction of the bony anatomy, with potential for better pre-operative planning and making these complex surgeries more precise and accurate.

Materials and methods

Anatomical 3D models of pelvis and femur were made based on CT scans of 27 patients undergoing complex primary THR/Revision THR by FDM (Fusion Deposition Modeling) technology using Flash Forge-Dreamer 3D printer with ABS (plastic) material. Models were used for pre-operative planning and simulation of surgery. Aims of the study were to study the accuracy of 3D models in predicting the implant sizes, accuracy in evaluation of acetabular bone defects and validating the utility of 3 D models through surgeon feedback.

Results

The acetabular cup size and placement was accurate in 25 (92.6%) patients. Preoperative acetabular bone defect was accurately estimated in all the patients. There were no neurovascular complications at early and 1-year follow-up in this case series. Model realism and reliability survey response from five surgeons was graded, with average overall usefulness of 3D models of 4.86/5, average model realism was 4.9/5, average usefulness for planning was 4.74/5 and usefulness for teaching was 5/5.

Conclusion

3D models are accurate and help in assessing acetabular bone deficiencies reliably in complex and revision THR. Anatomical models help in surgical planning and simulation, enabling surgeons in predicting the correct implant sizes and importantly placement of acetabular cup and for management of bone defects. The safe trajectory of acetabular screws can be simulated and determined, thereby avoiding penetration into pelvis and neuro-vascular injuries.

Risk factor investigation for hip dislocation after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction via thin-slice CT-based 3D model

AIMS

Dislocation of the hip remains a major complication after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The position of the acetabular component is an important modifiable factor for surgeons in determining the risk of postoperative dislocation. We investigated the significance of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal displacement of the hip centre of rotation (COR) on postoperative dislocation using a CT-based 3D model, as well as other potential risk factors for dislocation.

METHODS

A total of 122 patients who underwent reconstruction following resection of periacetabular tumour between January 2011 and January 2020 were studied. The risk factors for dislocation were investigated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis on patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables.

RESULTS

The dislocation rate was 13.9% (n = 17). The hip COR was found to be significantly shifted anteriorly and inferiorly in most patients in the dislocation group compared with the non-dislocation group. Three independent risk factors were found to be related to dislocation: resection of gluteus medius (odds ratio (OR) 3.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 to 19.70); p = 0.039), vertical shift of COR > 18 mm (OR 24.8 (95% CI 6.23 to 128.00); p = 0.001), and sagittal shift of COR > 20 mm (OR 6.22 (95% CI 1.33 to 32.2); p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Among the 17 patients who dislocated, 70.3% (n = 12) were anterior dislocations. Three independent risk factors were identified, suggesting the importance of proper restoration of the COR and the role of the gluteus medius in maintaining hip joint stability.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1180-1188.

Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model

Aims

Traditionally, total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating has been performed on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Recently, additional AP hip radiographs have been recommended for accurate measurement of the femoral offset (FO). To verify this claim, this study aimed to establish quantitative data of the measurement error of the FO in relation to leg position and X-ray source position using a newly developed geometric model and clinical data.

Methods

We analyzed the FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs in a prospective consecutive series of 55 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA for hip osteoarthritis. To determine sample size, a power analysis was performed. Patients’ position and X-ray beam setting followed a standardized protocol to achieve reproducible projections. All images were calibrated with the KingMark calibration system. In addition, a geometric model was created to evaluate both the effects of leg position (rotation and abduction/adduction) and the effects of X-ray source position on FO measurement.

Results

The mean FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs were 38.0 mm (SD 6.4) and 36.6 mm (SD 6.3) (p < 0.001), respectively. Radiological view had a smaller effect on FO measurement than inaccurate leg positioning. The model showed a non-linear relationship between projected FO and femoral neck orientation; at 30° external neck rotation (with reference to the detector plane), a true FO of 40 mm was underestimated by up to 20% (7.8 mm). With a neutral to mild external neck rotation (≤ 15°), the underestimation was less than 7% (2.7 mm). The effect of abduction and adduction was negligible.

Conclusion

For routine THA templating, an AP pelvis radiograph remains the gold standard. Only patients with femoral neck malrotation > 15° on the AP pelvis view, e.g. due to external rotation contracture, should receive further imaging. Options include an additional AP hip view with elevation of the entire affected hip to align the femoral neck more parallel to the detector, or a CT scan in more severe cases. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):795–803.

Comparison between two- and three-dimensional methods for offset measurements after total hip arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to compare acetabular offset, femoral offset, and global offset measurements obtained after total hip arthroplasty (THA) between a two-dimensional (2D) method and a three-dimensional (3D) method. The subjects were 89 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis who underwent primary THA at our institution. Acetabular, femoral, and global offsets were measured by each of the 2D and 3D methods in native and implanted hips. In native hips, mean acetabular, femoral, and global offsets were 32.4 ± 3.3, 32.7 ± 4.5, 65.1 ± 5.7 mm, respectively, by the 2D method, and 32.3 ± 3.1, 38.1 ± 4.0, 70.4 ± 4.9 mm, respectively, by the 3D method. In implanted hips, mean acetabular, femoral, and global offsets were 27.6 ± 4.1, 33.8 ± 7.8, 61.4 ± 8.5 mm, respectively, by the 2D method, and 27.6 ± 3.9, 41.8 ± 6.2, 69.4 ± 7.2 mm, respectively, by the 3D method. There was significant difference in femoral and global offsets between the 2D and 3D methods in both native and implanted hips. Comparison of the 2D and 3D methods for evaluation of acetabular, femoral, and global offsets after THA clarified the usefulness and accuracy of the 3D method.

Higher femoral anteversion restoration accuracy after total hip arthroplasty with a proximally fixed anatomic stem than with a generic straight double-tapered stem

BACKGROUND

Femoral antetorsion in uncemented hip replacement hardly can be modified and the restoration of the anatomic anteversion might be difficult with standard stems. We compared femoral anteversion restoration of a generic straight stem with a proximally fixed anatomic stem that included a dual sagittal curvature and a proximal torsion. It was hypothesised that the restoration of the anteversion was more accurate with the anatomic stem.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this comparative study data were collected prospectively of 80 consecutive patients with total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. In the first 40 patients (Group I) a cementless proximally fixed anatomic stem with 15° antetorsion of the shaft and a dual sagittal curvature was used. Its design was based on a database of 3D CT images of 600 hips. For comparison a cementless generic straight double-tapered stem was implanted in the next 40 patients (Group II). All operations were performed by one experienced surgeon. All patients had a preoperative 3D planning. A low-dose CT scan was performed at 3 months postoperatively to determine the postoperative stem anteversion.

RESULTS

The demographics were similar in both groups. In group I the mean postoperative femoral anteversion was similar to the preoperative one (22.1° ± 10.2° vs. 20.4° ± 9°; p = 0.2). In Group II, the mean postoperative femoral anteversion was lower (12.9° ± 10.8°, vs. 18.3° ± 12°; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncemented standard femoral stems tend to reduce femoral anteversion. The used anatomic stem restored femoral anteversion better. The clinical impact of this finding has to be proven.

Stem Geometry Recommendation for Total Hip Replacement Planning Using Computed Tomography Data Analysis

Total Hip Replacement (THR) requires careful planning preparation, especially in the geometry suitability between the patient's bone and the implant. If it is applied incorrectly, it will be dangerous for the patient, such as the risk of complications, dislocation, and re-surgery. This paper aims to compare the size of the patient's THR geometry as a basis for consideration in implant designs to minimize the risk of harm after implantation. This study was limited to male patients only. The computed tomography scanning data (CT-Scan data) in the lower abdomen, segmented to hip joint area belonging to the American race and an Indonesian male, were compared. The comparison indicates that the American race data has a greater dimension than Indonesian. The American hip bone geometry result is following the standard modern implant by Johnson and Johnson size. By all analysis, the fittest geometry for the Indonesian male patient needs to adjust and has a smaller size than the commercial implant. This study finally recommends the specific length of the femoral stem for the optimal THR implant with the parameter values of Femoral Head Offset, Neck Length, Neck Shaft Angle, Mediolateral Width 1, Mediolateral Width 2, Mediolateral Width 3 respectively for the right THR, namely 37.9; 31.6; 134.3; 43.1; 13.62; 12.36; while the left THR is 38.9; 31.7; 134.5; 43.1; 13.70; 12.4 in mm. Overall, the precise implant planning based on real patient conditions and anthropometry is necessary to match implants and bone anatomy.

Pre-operative templating in THA using a short stem system: precision and accuracy of 2D versus 3D planning method

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most successful orthopaedic surgery of the past century. The current study aimed to compare the accuracy of digital planning using 2D versus 3D templating.

Materials and methods

Ninety-five THAs in 90 patients were included in the current study. Pre- and post-operative X-rays (in two planes) and low-dose rotation computed tomography scans from hip to foot were performed. Paired t-test and regression analyses were conducted to compare 2D and 3D templating accuracy of the definitive implant.

Results

Cup size planned both with 2D (p < 0.0001) and 3D (p = 0.012) templating was significantly different from the definitively used cup size. The difference between the 2D-planned and implanted stem size (p < 0.0001) was statistically significant. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the 3D-planned and implanted stem size (p = 0.181). Three-dimensional templating showed significantly higher accuracy than 2D templating in terms of cup size (1.1 ± 1.4 versus 1.7 ± 1.8; p = 0.007) and stem size (0.3 ± 0.6 versus 0.7 ± 0.7; p < 0.0001).

With increasing body mass index (BMI), 2D templating of the stem became more inaccurate (p = 0.041). Remarkably, 3D templating remained accurate for all components (stem, p = 0.533; cup, p = 0.479) despite increasing BMI.

Conclusion

Despite extended planning time and increased exposure to radiation, 3D-based planning showed higher accuracy than 2D templating, especially in obese patients. On the basis of our results, we believe that 3D-based pre-operative planning in THA is justifiable and beneficial in patients with increased BMI.

Level of Evidence

III.

Evaluation of optimal implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty based on postoperative range of motion simulation

BACKGROUND

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty is a frequent cause of revision surgery. This study was performed to determine the optimal implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty by simulating the postoperative range of motion.

METHODS

All operations were performed via posterolateral approach using combined anteversion of the stem and cup technique. Maximum range of motion without implant impingement was simulated in 79 replaced hips using postoperative computed tomography and the achievement of the required range of motion defined by previous studies was assessed. Optimal cup and stem alignment for impingement-free range of motion were statistically determined using the receiver operator coefficient curve.

FINDINGS

Cup inclination and anteversion, stem anteversion, and combined anteversion were 37.6°, 20.1°, 26.2°, and 46.3°, respectively. Maximum range of motion in flexion, extension, internal rotation at 90° of flexion, and external rotation were 131.8°, 42.3°, 56.4°, and 64.5°, respectively. Flexion >110°, extension >30°, internal rotation >30° at 90° of flexion, and external rotation >30° were fulfilled by 96%, 86%, 92%, and 96% of all replaced hips, respectively. Optimal implant alignment for impingement-free range of motion was 34°-43° of cup inclination, 18°-26° of cup anteversion, 17°-29° of stem anteversion, and 35°-56° of combined anteversion. Both cup and stem anteversion showed significant relationship with postoperative range of motion.

INTERPRETATION

Surgeons could gain valuable insights into optimal cup and stem alignment to perform postoperative range of motion simulations.

Total elbow arthroplasty using an augmented reality-assisted surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Precision placement of implants in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using conventional surgical techniques can be difficult and riddled with errors. Modern technologies such as augmented reality (AR) and 3-dimensional (3D) printing have already found useful applications in many fields of medicine. We proposed a cutting-edge surgical technique, augmented reality total elbow arthroplasty (ARTEA), that uses AR and 3D printing to provide 3D information for intuitive preoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of humeral and ulnar component placement using ARTEA.

METHODS

Twelve upper extremities from human frozen cadavers were used for experiments performed in this study. We scanned the extremities via computed tomography prior to performing TEA to plan placement sites using computer simulations. The ARTEA technique was used to perform TEA surgery on 6 of the extremities, whereas conventional (non-ARTEA) techniques were used on the other 6 extremities. Computed tomography scanning was repeated after TEA completion, and the error between the planned and actual placements of humeral and ulnar components was calculated and compared.

RESULTS

For humeral component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 1.4° ± 0.6° vs. 4.4° ± 0.9° in total rotation (P = .002) and 1.5 ± 0.6 mm vs. 8.6 ± 1.3 mm in total translation (P = .002). For ulnar component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 5.5° ± 3.1° vs. 19.5° ± 9.8° in total rotation (P = .004) and 1.5 ± 0.4 mm vs. 6.9 ± 1.6 mm in total translation (P = .002). Both rotational accuracy and translational accuracy were greater for joint components replaced using the ARTEA technique compared with the non-ARTEA technique (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional surgical techniques, ARTEA had greater accuracy in prosthetic implant placement when used to perform TEA.

Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Objective

We performed a retrospective study to compare the accuracy of preoperative planning using three-dimensional AI-HIP software and traditional two-dimensional manual templating to predict the size and position of prostheses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI-HIP in preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

In total, 316 hips treated from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A typical preoperative planning process for patients was implemented to compare the accuracy of the two preoperative planning methods with respect to prosthetic size and position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the homogeneity between the actual prosthetic size and position and the preoperative planning method.

Results

When AI-HIP software and manual templating were used for preoperative planning, the stem agreement was 87.7% and 58.9%, respectively, and the cup agreement was 94.0% and 65.2%, respectively. The results showed that when AI-HIP software was used, an extremely high level of consistency (ICC > 0.95) was achieved for the femoral stem size, cup size, and femoral osteotomy level (ICC = 0.972, 0.962, and 0.961, respectively).

Conclusion

AI-HIP software showed excellent reliability for predicting the component size and implant position in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Development and assessment of 3-dimensional computed tomography measures of proximal humeral bone density: a comparison to established 2-dimensional measures and intraoperative findings in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The purpose of this study was to develop novel three-dimensional (3D) measures of bone density from computed tomography (CT) scans and to compare them with validated two-dimensional (2D) radiographic assessments of bone density. Patient demographic data were also analyzed to see if there were any predictors of bone density (age, sex, etiology).

Methods

The study group consisted of 290 consecutive patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty surgery (total anatomic, reverse, and hemiarthroplasty). All underwent preoperative CT imaging. Three 3D CT measurements (metaphysis cancellous, metaphysis cortical, and proximal diaphysis) were developed and automated into software. The developed 3D measurements were compared with validated 2D measures (Tingart and Gianotti Index). Patient demographic data were correlated with these measurements. The difference between the size of the final sounder and of the final stem was calculated as Delta.

Results

There was moderately strong correlation between Tingart and Gianotti measures (0.674, P < .001), as well as between 3D metaphysis cancellous measurements and Tingart (0.645, P < .001). Decreased bone density was highly correlated with female sex. Tingart (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.91) and 3D metaphysis cancellous (AUC: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.84) had the highest correlation. These were significantly more than other measures of bone density (P < .01). Decreased bone density measured with Tingart also had moderate correlation with advanced age (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.6-0.73), but less so for etiology (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.55-0.69). The 3D metaphysis cancellous measure had lower correlation with age (AUC: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52-0.66) and etiology (AUC: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52-0.65). The highest correlation with Delta (the difference between the final sounder and the stem size) was with the 3D metaphysis cancellous measure (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.59-0.73), followed by Tingart (AUC: 0.647, 95% CI: 0.57-0.671). A multiple regression model to predict Delta demonstrated the stronger prediction using 3D metaphysis cancellous (analysis of variance F-ratio of 42.6, P < .001) than Tingart (35.9, P < .001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that automated measures of bone density can be obtained from 3D CT scans. Of the three novel 3D measurements of bone density, the humeral metaphysis cancellous measurement was most correlated to the known 2D measures and most correlated to the intraoperative assessment of bone density (delta).

A higher reliability with a computed tomography scan-based three dimensional technique than with a two dimensional measurement for lower limb discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty planning

PURPOSE

The goal was to compare the reliability of a novel 3D method with the standard 2D technique for lower limb discrepancy (LLD) measurement during pre-operative THA planning.

METHODS

This prospective study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent THA using 3D planning based on a low-dose CT scan. The LLD was subdivided into three parameters: the intra-articular LLD (IA-LLD), the segmental extra-articular LLD (EA-LLD), and the total LLD (T-LLD). The LLD was assessed with a standard 2D technique on CT scanograms and also with a 3D method. A pelvic reference line (PBL) was determined as the 3D line joining the deepest part of the two great sciatic notches. The IA length was measured from the lesser trochanters (MLT) to the PBL. The EA length was measured from the MLT to the ankle center, and the total length was measured from the ankle center to the PBL. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the measurements was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The intra-observer ICC was higher with the 3D technique for IA-LLD (0.96-0.97 vs. 0.79-0.84), EA-LLD (0.96 vs. 0.78-0.92), and T-LLD (0.99 vs. 0.90-0.97). Inter-observer ICC was also higher with the 3D technique for IA-LLD (0.90-0.94 vs. 0.70-0.84) and EA-LLD (0.93-0.96 vs. 0.80-0.82), but not for T-LLD (0.91-0.94 vs. 0.91-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The presented 3D method has a higher reliability than 2D assessment of LLD during pre-operative THA planning. This article presents the first discussion of measuring LLD from 3D models. As 3D reconstruction becomes both more feasible and less-invasive, this study has interest to the orthopaedic surgeon.

Evaluation of femoral anteversion, hip rotation, and lateral patellar tilt after total hip arthroplasty using a changeable neck system

In patients with secondary osteoarthritis due to acetabular dysplasia, femoral anteversion has many variations. A changeable neck system is one useful option to adjust the femoral anteversion. Retroverted necks can effectively adjust anatomical anteversion (AA), femoral rotational angle (FRA), and functional anteversion (FA); however, effectiveness of anteverted necks for these adjustments has not been investigated. Moreover, although the lateral patellar tilt after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to externally rotate, the influence on lateral patellar tilt using a changeable neck system remains unknown. To clarify the effectiveness of anteverted necks in THA, 96 consecutive patients (111 hips) who underwent THA using anatomical short stem with a changeable neck system were retrospectively investigated using pre- and post-operative computed tomography. Patients were divided into the straight (ST) group using straight and 4-mm-high-offset neck (N = 34) and the anteverted (AV) group using 15°-anteverted and 15°-anteverted/3-mm-high-offset neck (N = 34) after age, body mass index, and surgical approach were matched using propensity scores. AA did not change in the ST group, while it increased by 14.0° in the AV group. FRA decreased after surgery in both groups. FA decreased after surgery in the ST group, while it did not change in the AV group. Lateral patella tilt did not significantly change in both groups between pre- and post-operative position. In conclusion, with a changeable neck system, straight and anteverted necks can adjust AA to achieve pre-operative planning while not influencing lateral patellar tilt.

EOS Imaging is Accurate and Reproducible for Preoperative Total Hip Arthroplasty Templating

BACKGROUND

Templating is a critical part of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The accuracy of templating on images acquired with EOS is unknown. This study sought to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of templating for THA using EOS imaging to conventional digital radiographs.

METHODS

Forty-three consecutive primary unilateral THAs were retrospectively templated, six months postoperatively, using preoperative 2D EOS imaging and conventional radiographs. Two blinded observers templated each case for acetabular and femoral component size and femoral offset. The retrospectively templated sizes were compared to the sizes selected during surgery. Interobserver agreement was calculated, and the influence of demographic variables was explored.

RESULTS

EOS templating predicted the exact acetabular and femoral size in 71% and 66% of cases, respectively, and to within one size in 98% of cases. The acetabular and femoral component size was more likely to be templated to the exact size using EOS compared to conventional imaging (P < .05). The femoral component offset choice was accurately predicted in 83% of EOS cases compared to 80% of conventional templates (P = .341). Component size and offset were not influenced by patient age, gender, laterality, or BMI. Interobserver agreement was excellent for acetabular (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and femoral (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96) component size.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative templating for THA using EOS imaging is accurate, with an excellent interobserver agreement. EOS exposes patients to less radiation than traditional radiographs, and its three-dimensional applications should be explored as they may further enhance preoperative plans.

The use of density mapping in the analysis of thigh pain after total hip arthroplasty in patients with well-fixed tapered wedge stems

PURPOSE

The mechanisms underlying thigh pain in patients with well-fixed cementless femoral components after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. We hypothesized that the thigh pain is correlated with the initial contact state of the stem and aimed to investigate the relation between thigh pain and the initial contact state.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 209 hips of 184 patients were analysed in this retrospective case-control study. The patients were divided into a thigh pain group (n = 13 hips) and a control group (without thigh pain, n = 196). Post-operative stem contact images were three-dimensionally visualized by a density mapping function using computed tomography data, which quantified the stem contact area according to Gruen zones. Thigh pain was defined as anterior or anterolateral pain upon loading at 3-month post-operatively.

RESULTS

Thirteen hips (6.2%) had thigh pain; however, all the hips demonstrated stable bony ingrowth radiographically. The thigh pain group had a significantly lower contact area in zone 2 (p = 0.014). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the contact area of zone 2 was negatively correlated with thigh pain [odds ratio (OR): 0.858, p = 0.018], and the canal flare index was negatively correlated with the development of thigh pain (OR: 0.336, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified an association between the initial contact state and post-operative thigh pain. Our data demonstrated that proper lateral contact prevents the occurrence of thigh pain in THA using a tapered wedge stem.

Risk factors for early dislocation of the hip after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the hemipelvis

AIMS

There is an increased risk of dislocation of the hip after the resection of a periacetabular tumour and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the defect in the hemipelvis. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and timing of dislocation and to identify its risk factors.

METHODS

To determine the dislocation rate, we conducted a retrospective single-institution study of 441 patients with a periacetabular tumour who had undergone a standard modular hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction between 2003 and 2019. After excluding ineligible patients, 420 patients were enrolled. Patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables were studied using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The dislocation rate was 9.3% (n = 41). Dislocation was most likely to occur in the first three months after surgery. Four independent risk factors were found, one of which was older age at operation (p = 0.039). The odds ratios (ORs) of those aged ≥ 60 years and 30 to 60 years were 8.50 and 4.64, respectively, compared with those aged < 30 years. The other three risk factors were resection of gluteus maximus (p = 0.010, OR = 5.8), vertical shift of the centre of rotation (COR) of the hip by ≥ 20 mm (p = 0.008, OR = 3.60), and a type I+II+III pelvic resection (p = 0.014, OR = 3.04).

CONCLUSION

Hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of a periacetabular tumour has a dislocation rate of 9.3% (n = 41). Patients are most likely to dislocate in the first three months after surgery. The risk is increased for older patients (especially those aged > 60 years) and for those with gluteus maximus resection, vertical shift of the COR ≥ 20 mm, and a type I+II+III pelvic resection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):382-390.

Three-dimensional pre-operative planning of primary hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review

Three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is being recognized as a useful tool in planning elective surgery, and as crucial to define the optimal component size, position and orientation. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature for the use of 3D pre-operative planning in primary THA.A systematic literature search was performed using keywords, through PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar, to retrieve all publications documenting the use of 3D planning in primary THA. We focussed on (1) the accuracy of implant sizing, restoration of hip biomechanics and component orientation; (2) the benefits and barriers of this tool; and (3) current gaps in literature and clinical practice.Clinical studies have highlighted the accuracy of 3D pre-operative planning in predicting the optimal component size and orientation in primary THAs. Component size planning accuracy ranged between 34-100% and 41-100% for the stem and cup respectively. The absolute, average difference between planned and achieved values of leg length, offset, centre of rotation, stem version, cup version, inclination and abduction were 1 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, 4°, 7°, 0.5° and 4° respectively.Benefits include 3D representation of the human anatomy for precise sizing and surgical execution. Barriers include increased radiation dose, learning curve and cost. Long-term evidence investigating this technology is limited.Emphasis should be placed on understanding the health economics of an optimized implant inventory as well as long-term clinical outcomes. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:845-855. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200046.

Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Modern designs of joint replacements require a large inventory of components to be available during surgery. Pre-operative CT imaging aids 3D surgical planning and implant sizing, which should reduce the inventory size and enhance clinical outcome. We aimed to better understand the impact of the use of 3D surgical planning and Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) on hip implant inventory.

METHODS

An initial feasibility study of 25 consecutive cases was undertaken to assess the discrepancy between the planned component sizes and those implanted to determine whether it was possible to reduce the inventory for future cases. Following this, we performed a pilot study to investigate the effect of an optimized inventory stock on the surgical outcome: we compared a group of 20 consecutive cases (experimental) with the 25 cases in the feasibility study (control). We assessed: (1) accuracy of the 3D planning system in predicting size (%); (2) inventory size changes (%); (3) intra and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

The feasibility study showed variability within 1 size range, enabling us to safely optimize inventory stock for the pilot study. (1) 3D surgical planning correctly predicted sizes in 93% of the femoral and 89% of the acetabular cup components; (2) there was a 61% reduction in the implant inventory size; (3) we recorded good surgical outcomes with no difference between the 2 groups, and all patients had appropriately sized implants.

CONCLUSIONS

3D planning is accurate in up to 95% of the cases. CT-based planning can reduce inventory size in the hospital setting potentially leading to a reduction in costs.

Conventional computed tomography software can be used for accurate pre-operative templating in bipolar hip arthroplasty: A preliminary report

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of pre-operative templating for bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) for displaced femoral neck fracture using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) of computed tomography (CT) images.

METHODS

Nineteen patients who underwent BHA were enrolled in this study. For pre- and post-operative evaluation, a CT scan was performed from the pelvis to the knee joints. MPR of the CT image was done using software to measure the femoral head cup diameter, offset, stem size, length of the modular neck, distance from the neck osteotomy, and femoral anteversion. We compared these parameters pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Both the femoral head cup diameter and length of the modular neck were found to be significantly different between pre- and post-operative measurements, although the differences were minor. Other parameters, including the femoral offset, were not significantly different between the pre- and post-operative measurements. The size of the femoral stem, cup diameter, and length of the modular neck were consistent with the planned size and accurate (within ±1 size) in more than 84% cases.

CONCLUSION

Our pre-operative templating approach for BHA using MPR of CT has potential clinical utility as a complementary tool for pre-operative planning using three-dimensional templating software. Moreover, this technique could be feasible in most hospitals without additional expenditure.

Pre-operative templating in THA. Part II: a CT-based strategy to correct architectural hip deformities

INTRODUCTION

Pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains inaccurate due to improper magnification and alignment. We aimed to describe an improved templating strategy using computed tomography (CT) to predict component sizes and offsets with greater accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed 184 CT images acquired for pre-operative templating of primary THA. We aimed to restore native (pre-arthritic) femoral offset and limb length, by raising the head center to the level of the templated cup center cranio-caudally, but maintaining the pathologic (pre-operative) head center medio-laterally (except in medialized hips). Acetabular offset (AO) and femoral offset (FO) were measured on pre-operative CT scans, during acetate templating, and on post-operative true antero-posterior radiographs.

RESULTS

The post-operative offsets were within ± 5 mm from templated estimates in 174 hips (91%) for AO, in 116 hips (61%) for FO, in 111 hips (58%) for GO, and in 134 hips (70%) for neck cut level. The post-operative hip architecture reproduced the templated hip architecture within ±5 mm in 77 hips (40%). The agreement between planned and post-operative parameters was moderate for stem size (0.57), cup size (0.62), AO (0.50), but fair for FO (0.45). The AO decreased in most arthritic types, notably in lateralized hips (6.6 mm), but remained unchanged in medialized hips. The FO increased in most arthritic types (1.8-3.1 mm) but remained unchanged in medialized and lateralized hips.

CONCLUSIONS

We described a strategy for pre-operative templating in THA. Despite the accuracy of CT, the authors found significant variations between planned and post-operative reconstructions, which suggest that pre-operative templating should only be used as an approximate guide.

Pre-operative planning in THA. Part III: do implant size prediction and offset restoration influence functional outcomes after THA?

INTRODUCTION

Few studies evaluated clinical benefits of pre-operative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated whether mismatch between planned and real implant sizes and medio-lateral offsets compromises THA outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed records of 184 primary THAs with pre-operative CT scans used for templating. Acetabular offset (AO), femoral offset (FO) and global offset (GO) were measured on pre-operative CT scans, during acetate templating, and post-operative antero-posterior radiographs. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine if Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at > 2 years were associated with differences between post-operative and planned parameters.

RESULTS

The FJS and OHS were not influenced by mismatch of component sizes nor of FO and GO. The FJS was better when the post-operative AO was greater than planned (p = 0.050). The FJS differed among arthritic types (p = 0.015). Multivariable analyses confirmed that older patients had better OHS (beta - 0.16; p = 0.033) and FJS (beta 0.74; p = 0.002), medialized hips had worse FJS (beta - 20.1; p = 0.041) and hips with greater AO than planned had better FJS (beta 1.71; p = 0.024) CONCLUSIONS: Implanting a component of different size than planned did not compromise THA outcomes, but medialized hips had worse scores, and conservative acetabular reaming improved scores.

Three-dimensional templating in hip arthroplasty: the basis for template-directed instrumentation?

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography-based three-dimensional models may allow the accurate determination of the center of rotation, lateral and anterior femoral offsets, and the required implant size in total hip arthroplasty. In this cadaver study, the accuracy of anatomical reconstruction was evaluated using a three-dimensional planning tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of eight hip arthroplasties were performed on four bilateral specimens. Based on a computed tomography scan, the position and size of the prosthesis were templated with respect to the anatomical conditions.

RESULTS

On average, all parameters were reconstructed to an accuracy of 4.5 mm and lie within the limits recommended in the literature. All prostheses were implanted with the templated size.

CONCLUSIONS

The exact anatomy of the patient and the required size and position of the prosthesis were precisely analyzed using a templating software. Based on the present findings, the development of template-directed instrumentation is conceivable using this method. However, further technical features (e.g., navigation or robot-assisted surgery) are required for improved precision for implant positioning.

Impact of stem design and cementation on postoperative femoral antetorsion in 227 patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA)

OBJECTIVE

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), surgeons attempt to achieve a physiological antetorsion. However, postoperative antetorsion of the femoral stem is known to show large variabilities. The purpose of this study was to assess whether postoperative antetorsion is influenced by stem design or cementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 227 patients with a hip prosthesis with five different stem designs (S1: short curved, S2 and S3: standard straight, S4: standard straight collared, S5: cemented straight), who had metal suppressed 1.5T-MRI of the hip between February 2015 and October 2019. Measurement of femoral antetorsion was done independently by two fellowship-trained radiologists on axial images by measuring the angle between the long axis of the femoral neck and the posterior condylar tangent of the knee. Measured angles in the different groups were compared using the t test for independent samples.

RESULTS

The cementless collared stem S4 showed the highest antetorsion with 18.1° (± 10.5°; range -10°-45°), which was significantly higher than the antetorsion of the collarless S3 with 13.3° (± 8.4°; - 4°-29°) and the cemented S5 with 12.7° (± 7.7°; - 3°-27°) with p = 0.012 and p = 0.007, respectively. S1 and S2 showed an antetorsion of 14.8° (± 10.0°; 1°-37°) and 14.1° (± 12.2°; - 20°-41°). The torsional variability of the cementless stems (S1-4) was significantly higher compared with that of the cemented S5 with a combined standard deviation of 10.5° and 7.7° (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Prosthesis design impacts the postoperative femoral antetorsion, with the cementless collared stem showing the highest antetorsion. Cemented stems demonstrated significantly lower variability, suggesting the lowest rate of inadvertent malrotation.

Pre-operative templating in THA. Part I: a classification of architectural hip deformities

INTRODUCTION

While numerous classifications of hip arthritis have been proposed, none considered the magnitude and direction of femoral head translation relative to the native acetabulum. A more precise classification of architectural hip deformities is necessary to improve preoperative templating and anticipate surgical challenges of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of the present study was to introduce a classification system to distinguish different types of architectural hip deformities, based on femoral head translation patterns, and to evaluate its repeatability using plain radiographs (qualitative) and Computed Tomography (CT) measurements (quantitative).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied pre-operative frontal and lateral hip radiographs and CT scans of 191 hips (184 patients) that received primary THA. The distance between the femoral head center (FC) and the acetabular center (AC) was measured, as well as femoral offset, acetabular offset, head center height, acetabular floor distance and femoral neck angle. The hips were classified qualitatively using frontal plain radiographs, and then quantitatively using CT scans (with an arbitrary threshold of 3 mm as Centered, Medialized, Lateralized, Proximalized or Proximo-lateralized. The agreement between qualitative and quantitative classification methods was compared for applying the same classification.

RESULTS

Qualitative classification identified 120 centered (63%), 8 medialized (4%), 49 lateralized (26%), 3 proximalized (2%), and 11 proximo-lateralized (6%) hips, while quantitative classification identified 116 centered (61%), 8 medialized (4%), 51 lateralized (27%), 5 proximalized (3%), and 11 proximo-lateralized (6%) hips. The agreement between the two methods was excellent (0.94; CI 0.90-0.98). Medialization reached 9.7 mm, while lateralization reached 10.9 mm, and proximalization reached 8.5 mm. Proximalized and proximo-lateralized hips had more valgus necks, while medialized hips had more varus necks (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The classification system enabled repeatable distinction of 5 types of architectural hip deformities. The excellent agreement between quantitative and qualitative methods suggests that plain radiographs are sufficient to classify architectural hip deformities.

High Variability of Acetabular Offset in Primary Hip Osteoarthritis Influences Acetabular Reaming-A Computed Tomography-Based Anatomic Study

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the present study were to (1) evaluate the accuracy and reliability of native acetabular offset (AO) measurements performed on conventional supine anterior-posterior (ap) pelvis radiographs with reference to computed tomography (CT) in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA); (2) determine the minimum and maximum amount of medialization of the center of rotation (COR) simulating different reaming techniques; and (3) identify patients at increased risk of excessive medialization of the COR.

METHODS

A consecutive series of corresponding 131 CT scans and radiographs of patients with primary hip OA was evaluated using validated software for three-dimensional acetabular and femoral measurements. We simulated the implantation of a hemispherical press-fit cup comparing anatomic and conventional reaming techniques and assessed corresponding changes in AO.

RESULTS

Standardized ap pelvis radiographs allowed for an accurate and reliable assessment of AO compared with CT. Cup placement in the most lateral position (anatomic reaming technique) resulted in a mean implant-related medialization of 5.9 ± 3.4 mm. Anatomic cup placement did not require reaming to the true floor in 64 hips (49%). With the conventional reaming technique, the total medialization of the COR (implant-related and reaming-related) was 6.8 ± 2.9, with 34% of cases having a medialization ≥8 mm.

CONCLUSION

The present study highlights the variability of acetabular anatomy in patients with primary OA. AO can be accurately and reliably determined on conventional radiographs and appears to be independent of femoral shape and geometry. Depending on the preferred reaming technique a substantial number of patients appear at risk for excessive cup medialization.

Is computerised 3D templating more accurate than 2D templating to predict size of components in primary total hip arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional 2-dimensional (2D) and computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensional (3D) measures.

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen consecutive primary THAs were analysed. The preoperative diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in all cases. The 2D templating and the 3D templating were performed by two different residents. All templating results were available for the orthopaedic surgeon performing the procedure. Accuracies with regard to the predicted and actual implant sizes were determined for each procedure. Implantation of the size as planned was defined as "exact", whereas the use of components within one size larger or smaller (±1) as planned were defined as "accurate."

RESULTS

The 3D templating was significantly more accurate in predicting implant sizing compared to 2D templating for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The difference was statistically significant for the cup templating (''exact'' p = 0.02; ''accurate'' p = 0.01) and for the stem templating (''exact'' p = 0.04; ''accurate'' p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results support the superiority of 3D templating over 2D templating in predicting implant size.

Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Biplanar Weightbearing Radiographs

Two-dimensional (2D) planning on standard radiographs for total hip arthroplasty may not be sufficiently accurate to predict implant sizing or restore leg length and femoral offset, whereas 3D planning avoids magnification and projection errors. Furthermore, weightbearing measures are not available with computed tomography (CT) and leg length and offset are rarely checked postoperatively using any imaging modality. Navigation can usually achieve a surgical plan precisely, but the choice of that plan remains key, which is best guided by preoperative planning. The study objectives were therefore to (1) evaluate the accuracy of stem/cup size prediction using dedicated 3D planning software based on biplanar radiographic imaging under weightbearing and (2) compare the preplanned leg length and femoral offset with the postoperative result. This single-centre, single-surgeon prospective study consisted of a cohort of 33 patients operated on over 24 months. The routine clinical workflow consisted of preoperative biplanar weightbearing imaging, 3D surgical planning, navigated surgery to execute the plan, and postoperative biplanar imaging to verify the radiological outcomes in 3D weightbearing. 3D planning was performed with the dedicated hipEOS® planning software to determine stem and cup size and position, plus 3D anatomical and functional parameters, in particular variations in leg length and femoral offset. Component size planning accuracy was 94% (31/33) within one size for the femoral stem and 100% (33/33) within one size for the acetabular cup. There were no significant differences between planned versus implanted femoral stem size or planned versus measured changes in leg length or offset. Cup size did differ significantly, tending towards implanting one size larger when there was a difference. Biplanar radiographs plus hipEOS planning software showed good reliability for predicting implant size, leg length, and femoral offset and postoperatively provided a check on the navigated surgery. Compared to previous studies, the predictive results were better than 2D planning on conventional radiography and equal to 3D planning on CT images, with lower radiation dose, and in the weightbearing position.

The influence of cavity preparation and press-fit cup implantation on restoring the hip rotation center

BACKGROUND

Reaming of the acetabular cavity and cup implantation directly influence the hip rotation center and contact area between implant and bone. Previous studies have reported on an altered rotation center after total hip arthroplasty, but have not studied the influence of reaming and cup implantation separately. Aim of this study was therefore to analyze the individual influence of acetabular reaming and subsequent cup implantation on the rotation center and how this influences the contact conditions at the bone-implant interface.

METHODS

Acetabular press-fit cups were implanted into the left and right hips of three full cadavers (n = 6). CT scans were performed to calculate the change in hip rotation center after reaming and prior to liner insertion. 3D models of the cups were used to determine the polar gap, the contact conditions and the effective press-fit.

FINDINGS

Reaming the acetabular cavity shifted the rotation center medially (median 5.8 mm, range 4.8-9.1), superiorly (5.3 mm, 3.0-7.0) and posteriorly (2.9 mm, 1.0-5.3). With cup implantation, the rotation center shifted back towards the native position, but no full restoration was observed. The degree of shift increased with the size of polar gap (r_s = 0.829, P = .042), which inversely reduced the contact area (r_s = 0.886, P = .019).

INTERPRETATION

This study reveals that the dominant factor in hip rotation center restoration is the reaming process, while the cup implantation for a given nominal press-fit has only a small influence. Increasing the press-fit would improve the restoration but bares the danger of insufficient bone coverage and periprosthetic fractures due to the high forces needed.

Surgically Relevant Morphological Parameters of Proximal Human Femur: A Statistical Analysis Based on 3D Reconstruction of CT Data

Objectives

Recently, more accurate description of the femoral geometry has become of interest to engineers and orthopedic surgeons. However, an appropriate database is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study is to present morphological parameters and their correlations, which are relevant for medical issues such as impingement after total hip replacement, as well as for implant design and the etiology of hip fractures.

Methods

We investigated 12 well‐known morphological parameters of the femur in 169 healthy human subjects through evaluation of 3D‐reconstructed CT scans. Pearson's coefficients of correlations were calculated using a statistical t‐test method for each pair of parameters.

Results

The mean, maximum, minimum, median, and standard deviation values are reported for all parameters. Histograms showing the distribution of each morphological parameter are also presented. It is shown that absolute and horizontal offsets, total femur length, and NCVD parameters are normally distributed, but NCDF and NCDS are not. Furthermore, an inter‐correlation matrix was reported to reveal statistical correlations between these parameters. The strongest positive correlation existed between absolute offset (OSA) and horizontal offset (OSH), while the least positive correlation was found between NCDF and total femur length (TFL), and also between NCDS and NCDF. Anteversion angle (ATA) and OSA showed the least negative correlation. However, the strongest negative correlation was found between neck‐shaft angle (NSA) and greater trochanter height (GTH), as well as between OSA and NCVD.

Conclusions

Comprehending patients’ native bone morphology, including the variations and correlations, is essential for orthopedic surgeons to undertake preoperative planning and surgery as well as to appropriately design medical devices. Thus, more population‐based detailed databases are necessary. We investigated an extensive set of proximal femoral morphology parameters using a statistically standardized method to expand the existing knowledge. The results of our study can be used for diverse medical and biomechanical purposes.

Value of Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Pre-operative Planning in Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Dysplastic Acetabulum

Objects: To investigate the value of CT-based 3D templating software for pre-operative planning in patients with acetabular dysplasia undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's cohort of patients with Crowe I to III developmental dysplastic hip (49 hips in 41 patients) who underwent cementless primary THA and were available for follow-up at a mean of 2.7 years after THA. We analyzed the accuracy of cup size prediction, the reliability of pre- and post-operative cup orientation and position of reconstructed rotation center using CT-based 3D templating software. Post-operative Harris Hip Score and lower limb discrepancy was obtained at the last follow-up. Results: The sizes of 71% of the cup components (35/49) were estimated exactly, and 100% of the cup size estimates were accurate to within one-cup size. There was good reproducibility of pre- and post-operative position of reconstructed rotation center (correlation coefficient r = 0.396 for vertical position, p = 0.005; r = 0.326 for horizontal position, p = 0.024). There was no substantial agreement between the planned acetabular orientation and that measured post-operatively (correlation coefficient -0.174 for inclination and 0.045 for anteversion). There were 44 (90%) excellent or good results according to HHS. Seven patients (14%) reported lower limb discrepancy. Conclusions: Pre-operative CT-based 3D templating made it possible to predict accurate cup size and achieve reproducible cup position in patients with dysplastic acetabulum. The reproducibility of cup orientation could not be demonstrated in this study.

Computed tomography-based 3-dimensional preoperative planning for unlinked total elbow arthroplasty

HYPOTHESIS

Three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning for unlinked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) would be helpful for estimation of the implant size and accurate placement of implants.

METHODS

We included 28 patients who underwent TEA with an unlinked total elbow implant in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography scans of the elbow before surgery, and a 3D digital model of the elbow was reconstructed. After the appropriate size and position of the prosthesis were determined, 10 points around the bone tunnel (4 on the humerus and 6 on the ulna) were measured to plan the insertion of the humeral and ulnar stems. Two-dimensional planning was also performed using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Intraoperatively, the surgeon measured the planned parameters using a slide gauge to reproduce the 3D planned position of the stem insertion.

RESULTS

The stem sizes were accurately estimated in 57% of patients for the humerus and 68% for the ulna with 2-dimensional planning and in 86% for the humerus and 96% for the ulna with 3D planning. The mean differences between the positions of the prostheses after surgery with reference to the planned positions were 0.8° of varus and 1.5° of flexion for the humeral component and 0.7° of varus and 2.9° of flexion for the ulnar component. We did not evaluate rotational positioning in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D surgical planning allowed accurate estimation of the implant size and appropriate placement of implants. This method may contribute to a reduced incidence of complications and improved long-term outcomes from TEA.

What is the tolerated width of periacetabular osteophytes to avoid impingement in cementless THA?: a three-dimensional simulation study

BACKGROUNDS

Impingement is a risk factor for instability and prosthetic failure following total hip arthroplasty (THA). If the periacetabular osteophytes are not removed at surgery, impingement could occur between the osteophytes and the femoral stem following THA. However, excessive removal of the osteophytes could lead to bleeding from the bone. The aim of our study, therefore, was to locate the site of the impingement and to determine the width of tolerable osteophytes, which does not induce impingement during activities of daily living (ADL), using a three-dimensional simulation.

METHODS

On 35 hip models, virtual THA was performed. The acetabular cups were positioned at 45° abduction and 20° anteversion, and the anteversion of femoral stems was 15°. Circular osteophytes with a 30-mm rim were built around the acetabular cup. Fourteen ADL motions were simulated, and the osteophytes were removed until there was no impingement. A clock face was used to map the location and the width of tolerable osteophytes.

RESULTS

The impingement mainly occurred in antero-superior and posterior portions around the acetabular cup. Only 4.2-6.2-mm osteophytes were tolerable at the antero-superior portion (12-3 o'clock) and 6.3-7.2-mm osteophytes at the posterior portion (8-10 o'clock) following a total hip arthroplasty. In antero-inferior and postero-superior portions, over-20-mm osteophytes did not induce any impingement.

CONCLUSION

Osteophytes in the antero-superior and posterior portion of the acetabulum should be excised during a THA to avoid impingement of the femur-stem construct on the acetabular osteophytes during ADLs.

Biomechanical Robustness of a Contemporary Cementless Stem to Surgical Variation in Stem Size and Position

Successful designs of total hip replacement (THR) need to be robust to surgical variation in sizing and positioning of the femoral stem. This study presents an automated method for comprehensive evaluation of the potential impact of surgical variability in sizing and positioning on the primary stability of a contemporary cementless femoral stem (Corail®, DePuy Synthes). A patient-specific finite element (FE) model of a femur was generated from computed tomography (CT) images from a female donor. An automated algorithm was developed to span the plausible surgical envelope of implant positions constrained by the inner cortical boundary. The analysis was performed on four stem sizes: oversized, ideal (nominal) sized, and undersized by up to two stem sizes. For each size, Latin hypercube sampling was used to generate models for 100 unique alignment scenarios. For each scenario, peak hip contact and muscle forces published for stair climbing were scaled to the donor's body weight and applied to the model. The risk of implant loosening was assessed by comparing the bone–implant micromotion/strains to thresholds (150 μm and 7000 με) above which fibrous tissue is expected to prevail and the periprosthetic bone to yield, respectively. The risk of long-term loosening due to adverse bone resorption was assessed using bone adaptation theory. The range of implant positions generated effectively spanned the available intracortical space. The Corail stem was found stable and robust to changes in size and position, with the majority of the bone–implant interface undergoing micromotion and interfacial strains that are well below 150 μm and 7000 με, respectively. Nevertheless, the range of implant positions generated caused an increase of up to 50% in peak micromotion and up to 25% in interfacial strains, particularly for retroverted stems placed in a medial position.

Clinical outcomes following arthroscopic treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement using a minimal traction approach and an initial capsulotomy. Minimum two year follow-up

PURPOSE

Although the arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is increasing, severe complications have been reported due to traction. We developed an arthroscopic technique based on an initial capsulotomy and a minimal traction approach. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of FAI treatment using this technique after at least two years of follow-up.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients underwent surgery for FAI. There were two initial portals: a proximal anterolateral portal and a distal anterior instrumental portal. An anterior working space was created and a T-shaped incision was made in the anterior capsule to relieve joint distraction. Short traction (less than 20 mn) made it possible to approach the central compartment. Acetabuloplasty was performed in the presence of pincer impingement. Traction was then released. A head-neck femoral osteochondroplasty was performed in case of bump impingement. All patients underwent a mean 3.3 ± one years of follow-up based on two self-administered questionnaires: the Harris hip score and the QOL Oxford score. None of the patients were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

There were three complications: two ossifications and one case of injury to the femoral cutaneous nerve with good clinical outcomes at the final follow-up. Five patients (10%) underwent surgical revision after a mean 1.4 years of follow-up: three total hip arthroplasties, one peri-acetabular osteotomy, and one repeat arthroscopic hip debridement. The Harris score increased significantly from 60 ± 10 to 86 ± 15 (p < 0.0001) and the Oxford score improved from 34 ± 15 to 50 ± 11. Only 25% of patients had a "forgotten hip" at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our clinical results were comparable to previously reported outcomes with other surgical techniques for the management of FAI. However, it should also be noted that despite these good clinical outcomes, the percentage of patients with a "forgotten hip" is low, and patients should be informed of this.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning Software in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to clarify interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of the three-dimensional (3D) templating of total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We selected preoperative computed tomography from 60 hips in 46 patients (14 men and 32 women) who underwent primary THA. To evaluate interobserver and intraobserver reliability, 6 orthopedic surgeons performed 3D templating twice over a 4-week interval. We investigated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and percent agreement of component size and alignment, comparing morphological differences in the hip. Reproducibility was also compared between groups with osteoarthritis (OA) and those with osteonecrosis (ON).

RESULTS

The interobserver reliabilities for mean cup size and stem size were excellent, with ICC = 0.907 and 0.944, respectively. The value was significantly higher in the ON group than in the OA group. In the OA group, the reliability of cup size and alignment decreased in hips with severe subluxation. Percent agreement of stem size was significantly different between the shapes of femoral canal. For intraobserver reliability, the mean ICC of cup size was 0.965 overall, while the value in the ON group was significantly higher than in the OA group. The mean ICC of stem size was 0.972 overall.

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography-based 3D templating showed excellent reliability for component size and alignment in THA. Deformity of the affected joint influenced the reliability of preoperative planning.

Modal analysis for the assessment of cementless hip stem primary stability in preoperative THA planning

This numerical vibration finite element (FE) study introduces resonance three-dimensional planning (RP3D) to assess preoperatively the primary stability of a cementless stem for total hip arthroplasty. Based on a patient's CT-scan and a numerical model of a stem, RP3D aims at providing mechanical criteria indicative of the achievable primary stability. We investigate variations of the modal response of the stem to changes of area and apparent stiffness of the bone-implant interface. The model is computationally cheap as it does not include a mesh of the bone. The apparent stiffness of the bone is modeled by springs attached to the nodes of the stem's mesh. We investigate an extended range of stiffness values while, in future works, patient's specific Hounsfield values could be used to define stiffness. We report modal frequencies, shapes, and a ratio of elastic potential energies (rEPE) that quantifies the proximal motion that should be minimum for a stable stem. The modal response exhibits a clear transition between loose and tight contact as area and stiffness of the interface increase. rEPE thresholds that could potentially discriminate preoperatively between stable and unstable stems are given for a Symbios SPS^® size C stem.

A Single-Center Experience With a Titanium Modular Neck Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Added modular junction has been associated with implant-related failures. We report our experience with a titanium-titanium modular neck-stem interface to assess complications, possible clinical factors influencing use of neck modularity, and whether modularity reduced the incidence of dislocation.

METHODS

A total of 809 total hip arthroplasties completed between 2005 and 2012 from a prospectively collected database were reviewed. The mean follow-up interval was 5.7 years (3.3-10.3 years). Forty-five percent were male (360 of 809), and 55% were female (449 of 809). All stems were uncemented PROFEMUR TL (titanium, flat-tapered, wedge) or PROFEMUR Z (titanium, rectangular, dual-tapered) with a titanium neck.

RESULTS

Increased modularity (anteverted/retroverted and anteverted/retroverted varus/valgus (anteverted/retroverted + anteverted/retroverted varus/valgus) was used in 39.4% (135 of 343) of cases using the posterior approach compared with 6.8% (20 of 293) of anterior and 23.7% (41 of 173) of lateral approaches. Four males sustained neck fractures at a mean of 95.5 months (69.3-115.6 months) after primary surgery. Overall dislocation rate was 1.1% (9 of 809). The posterior approach had both the highest utilization of increased modularity and the highest dislocation rate (2.3%), of which the most were recurrent. The anterior (0.3%) and lateral (0%) approaches had lower dislocation rates with no recurrences.

CONCLUSION

At a mean 5.7 years, our experience demonstrates a low neck fracture (0.5%) and a low dislocation rate (1.1%). Use of increased modularity may not improve dislocation risk for the posterior approach. Continued surveillance of this group will be necessary to determine long term survivorship of this modular titanium implant.

Two-incisions direct anterior approach for THR: Surgical technique and early outcome

PURPOSE

In recent times the direct anterior approach for total hip replacement has gained considerable interest among orthopaedic surgeons because of the relative muscle-sparing nature than other surgical approaches. However, critics believe that this approach is associated with steep learning curve and high complication rates, mainly attributed to a more limited exposure to the femur. In order to make femoral access easier and implantation of acetabulum in anatomic plane, we designed a "two incisions anterior approach technique" for total hip replacement. The aim of the present study is to determine safety of this technique with respect to perioperative complications as well as early clinical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review is carried out on a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary total hip replacement by the single surgeon through the two incisions direct anterior approach from 01/2014 to 11/2014. We analysed peri-operative complications and clinical outcome at two years' follow-up.

RESULTS

We observed 01(0.9%) intra-operative complication; calcar fracture and 01(0.9%) anterior dislocation in first post-operative week. All patients reported improvement of their symptoms. The mean modified oxford hip score was significantly better from 25(11-37), preoperatively to 46.97(33-48) at mean latest follow-up. The mean modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved to 16.84(12-18) from 9.25 (4-14) preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The described surgical technique is simple and reproducible technique for easier exposure of femur and insertion of acetabulum in anatomic plane for total hip replacement through direct anterior approach. Easier and better femoral access helps to place implant in anatomical position as well as reduces the risk of femoral fracture associated with inadequate femoral exposure. The added advantage of this technique is, risks of injury to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve can be minimised by careful dissection and isolation of the nerve.

Accuracy and reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional planning for total hip arthroplasty using biplanar low-dose radiographs : A pilot study

BACKGROUND

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the acetabular cup and femoral stem must be correctly sized and positioned to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications, achieve good functional outcomes and ensure long-term survival. Current two-dimensional (2D) techniques do not provide sufficient accuracy, while low-dose biplanar X-rays (EOS) had not been assessed in this indication. Therefore, we performed a case-control study to : (1) evaluate the prediction of stem and cup size for a new 3D planning technique (stereoradiographic imaging plus 3D modeling) in comparison to 2D templating on film radiographs and (2) evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of this 3D technique for preoperative THA planning.

HYPOTHESIS

Accuracy and reproducibility are better with the 3D vs. 2D method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stem and cup sizes were retrospectively determined by two senior surgeons, twice, for a total of 31 unilateral primary THA patients in this pilot study, using 3D preplanning software on low-dose biplanar X-rays and with 2D templating on conventional anteroposterior (AP) film radiographs. Patients with a modular neck or dual-mobility prosthesis were excluded. All patients but one had primary osteoarthritis; one following trauma did not have a cup implanted. The retrospectively planned sizes were compared to the sizes selected during surgery, and intraclass coefficients (ICC) calculated.

RESULTS

3D planning predicted stem size more accurately than 2D templating: stem sizes were planned within one size in 26/31 (84%) of cases in 3D versus 21/31 (68%) in 2D (P=0.04). 3D and 2D planning accuracies were not significantly different for cup size: cup sizes were planned within one size in 28/30 (92%) of cases in 3D versus 26/30 (87%) in 2D (P=0.30). ICC for stem size were 0.88 vs. 0.91 for 3D and 2D, respectively. Inter-operator ICCs for cup size were 0.84 vs. 0.71, respectively. Repetitions of the 3D planning were within one size (except one stem), with the majority predicting the same size.

DISCUSSION

Increased accuracy in 3D may be due to the use of actual size (non-magnified) images, and judging fit on AP and lateral images simultaneously. Results for other implant components may differ from those presented. Size selection may improve further with planning experience, based on a feedback loop between planning and surgical execution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Retrospective case-control study.