Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement

In vivo kinematic comparison of bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty between mechanical alignment and functional alignment methods

Background/objective

This study aimed to clarify the kinematics of bi-cruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing the mechanical alignment (MA) and functional alignment (FA) methods and to evaluate differences between the two alignment methods.

Methods

The in vivo kinematics of 20 MA TKA and 20 FA TKA knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting using a two-to three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, knee flexion angle, axial rotational angle, varus-valgus angle, anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral low contact points of the femoral component relative to the tibial component and kinematic pathway were evaluated.

Results

No difference in the knee flexion angle was observed between the MA and FA TKA groups. Femoral external rotation was observed in both groups and no significant difference was observed. Significant varus alignment from extension to early flexion range was observed in the FA TKA group. The posterior translation of the medial side was smaller in the FA TKA group than in the MA TKA group. Conversely, no significant difference in the anteroposterior translation of the lateral side was observed. In the kinematic pathway, a medial pivot motion from 0° to 20° of flexion and a lateral pivot motion beyond 20° of flexion were observed in both groups.

Conclusion

During squatting in BCR TKA, the FA TKA group significantly showed varus alignment and smaller posterior translation of the medial side than the MA TKA group from extension to early flexion range.

Evaluation of the efficacy after Total Knee Arthroplasty by Gait analysis in patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee replacement (TKA) is a frequent modality performed in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the efficacy after TKA by gait analysis in patients with OA.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies from inception to July 2024. STATA SE 14.0 software was used for statistical analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guideline.

RESULTS

A total of 2525 reports were identified with 24 studies meeting pre-designed inclusion criteria. Several gait parameters were investigated. In patients with knee OA after TKA, there existed an increase in the Max knee flexion (WMD, 3.12; 95% CI, 0.93 to 5.32; I2 = 73.9%, P < 0.001), the Cadence (WMD, 4.05; 95% CI, 2.28 to 5.82; I2 = 48.9%, P = 0.068), the stride length (WMD, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.09; I2 = 77.1%, P < 0.001), the walking speed (WMD, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.14; I2 = 93.3%, P < 0.001), and the step length (WMD, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.07; I2 = 89.3%, P < 0.001) while a decrease in the double support time (WMD, -0.04; 95% CI, - 0.08 to -0.01; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.585). Besides, no statistically significant differences were observed in the Knee range of motion (ROM), the Max knee rotation at stance phase, the Max knee extension, the step width, the stride time and the step time. Sensitivity analysis showed that all the results were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the study found that, in patients with knee OA undergoing TKA may have great effects on improving gait parameters. If there are more high-quality studies in the future, we should make a more comprehensive evaluation of walking function by gait analysis together with other evaluation systems such as muscle strength and proprioception measurement.

Kinematic and mechanical alignments in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis with ≥1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Kinematic and mechanical alignment outcomes in total knee arthroplasty remain controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using kinematic and mechanical alignments.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published before November 2022. The data of interest were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager V.5.4.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomized controlled trials and cohort studies involving 880 kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasties and 965 mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasties were included. In this meta-analysis, the kinematic alignment group achieved better knee joint function scores, including the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Knee Society Score, and better flexion angles. No statistical differences were detected in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, extension angle, Forgotten Joint Score, European Quality of Life five-dimension measure, hip-knee-ankle angle, or complications between the kinematic and mechanical alignment groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicated that kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty provides clinical benefits in terms of the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Knee Society Score (knee), Knee Society Score (function), and better flexion angles. In addition, kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty led to similar clinical outcomes as mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty without increasing complications.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/CRD42022373227.

No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

There is continuing debate about the ideal philosophy for component alignment in TKA. However, there are limited long-term functional and radiographic data on randomized comparisons of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We present the 10-year follow-up findings of a single-center, multisurgeon randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two alignment philosophies in terms of the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in PROM scores? (2) Is there a difference in survivorship free from revision or reoperation for any cause? (3) Is there a difference in survivorship free from radiographic loosening?

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis were randomized to either the mechanical alignment (n = 50) or kinematic alignment (n = 49) group. Eligibility for the study was patients undergoing unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis who were suitable for a cruciate-retaining TKA and could undergo MRI. Patients who had previous osteotomy, coronal alignment > 15° from neutral, a fixed flexion deformity > 15°, or instability whereby constrained components were being considered were excluded. Computer navigation was used in the mechanical alignment group, and patient-specific cutting blocks were used in the kinematic alignment group. At 10 years, 86% (43) of the patients in the mechanical alignment group and 80% (39) in the kinematic alignment group were available for follow-up performed as a per-protocol analysis. The PROMs that we assessed included the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC, Forgotten Joint Score, and EuroQol 5-Dimension score. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survivorship free from reoperation (any reason) and revision (change or addition of any component). A single blinded observer assessed radiographs for signs of aseptic loosening (as defined by the presence of progressive radiolucent lines in two or more zones), which was reported as survivorship free from loosening.

RESULTS

At 10 years, there was no difference in any PROM score measured between the groups. Ten-year survivorship free from revision (components removed or added) likewise did not differ between the groups (96% [95% CI 91% to 99%] for the mechanical alignment group and 91% [95% CI 83% to 99%] for the kinematic alignment group; p = 0.38). There were two revisions in the mechanical alignment group (periprosthetic fracture, deep infection) and four in the kinematic alignment group (two secondary patella resurfacings, two deep infections). There was no statistically significant difference in reoperations for any cause between the two groups. There was no difference with regard to survivorship free from loosening on radiographic review (χ2 = 1.3; p = 0.52) (progressive radiolucent lines seen at 10 years were 0% for mechanical alignment and 3% for kinematic alignment).

CONCLUSION

Like the 2-year and 5-year outcomes previously reported, 10-year follow-up for this RCT demonstrated no functional or radiographic difference in outcomes between mechanical alignment and kinematic alignment TKA. Anticipated functional benefits of kinematic alignment were not demonstrated, and revision-free survivorship at 10 years did not differ between the two groups. Given the unknown long-term impact of kinematic alignment with regard to implant position (especially tibial component varus), we must conclude that mechanical alignment remains the reference standard for TKA. We could not demonstrate any advantage to kinematic alignment at 10-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

A Restricted Functional Balancing Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Varus Deformity: Does a Medial Soft-Tissue Release Result in a Worse Outcome?

BACKGROUND

A functional alignment technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizes implant position modifications to balance the soft tissues. There is concern that, in some cases, extreme coronal and tibial component alignment could facilitate early implant failure. To be cautious, a restricted functional alignment may be used. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the results of TKA in patients who have varus deformities using a restricted functional alignment technique. We hypothesized that adding a medial soft-tissue release within restricted boundaries would not result in inferior outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on robotic arm-assisted TKA patients with varus deformities utilizing a functional balancing strategy with a three-degree varus coronal limb and tibial component alignment restriction. Outcome scores of those patients still requiring a medial-soft tissue release were compared to those without for inferior outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 202 of 259 (78.0%) knees were able to be balanced without any medial soft-tissue release with an average final hip-knee-ankle alignment of 1.9° varus. The remaining 57 knees required a medial soft-tissue release. They had an average final hip-knee-ankle of 2.8° varus and an average medial proximal tibial angle of 2.5° varus. Comparing the cohorts without and with a release, at final follow-up averaging two years, there was not a statistically significant difference in Knee Society-Knee Score (97.7 and 98.4, P = .525), Functional Score (86.7 and 88.7, P = .514), Forgotten Joint Score (59.8 and 66.6, P = .136), and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey for Joint Replacement Junior Score (79.5 and 84.8, P = .066).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a restrictive functional balancing strategy for TKA minimizes the need for soft-tissue releases and provides for excellent overall outcomes. An additional medial soft-tissue release can still be utilized without an inferior average two-year outcome.

Improved Clinical Outcomes With Dynamic, Force-Controlled, Gap-Balancing in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Optimal soft-tissue management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may reduce symptomatic instability. We hypothesized that TKA outcomes using a computer-assisted dynamic ligament balancer that acquires medial and lateral gap sizes throughout the motion arc would show improved Knee Society Scores (KSS) compared to TKAs done with a traditional tensioner at 0 and 90°. We also sought to quantify the degree to which the planned femoral rotation chosen to optimize medio-lateral balance throughout the arc of motion deviated from the femoral rotation needed to achieve a rectangular flexion gap at 90° alone.

METHODS

Baseline demographics, clinical outcomes, KSSs, and femoral rotations were compared in 100 consecutive, computer-assisted TKAs done with the balancer (balancer group) to the immediately prior 100 consecutive computer-assisted TKAs done without the balancer (control group). Minimum follow-up was 13 months and all patients had osteoarthritis. Mean knee motion did not differ preoperatively (110.1 ± 13.6° balancer, 110.4 ± 12.5° control, P = .44) or postoperatively (119.1 ± 10.3° balancer, 118.8 ± 10.9° control, P = .42). Tourniquet times did not differ (93.1 ± 13.0 minutes balancer, 90.7 ± 13.0 minutes control, P = .13). Postoperative length of stay differed (40.2 ± 20.9 hours balancer, 49.0 ± 18.3 hours control, P = .0009). There were 14 readmissions (7 balancer, 7 control), 11 adverse events (4 balancer, 7 control), and 3 manipulations (1 balancer, 2 control). The cohorts were compared using Student's t-tests, Shapiro-Wilk normalities, Wilcoxon rank-sums, and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Postoperative KSS improvements were higher in the balancer group (P < .0001). In multivariable regression analyses, the balancer group experienced 7 ± 2 point improvement in KSS Knee scores (P < .0001) and 4 ± 2 point improvement in KSS Function scores (P = .040) compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The statistically and clinically significant improvements in postoperative KSS demonstrated in the balancer cohort are likely driven by improved stability throughout the motion arc. Further study is warranted to evaluate replicability by non-design surgeons.

No difference in postoperative patient satisfaction rates between mechanical and kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review was to compare patient satisfaction patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) levels after mechanically aligned (MA) and kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus to identify potentially relevant articles for this review, published from the beginning of March 2013 until the end of October 2023. Only articles reporting satisfaction after KA TKA, MA TKA or both were included, which use valid and reliable tools for the evaluation and reporting of satisfaction after TKA. Title, authors, year of publication, study design, level of evidence, follow-up period, patients' demographic data, sample size, type of satisfaction score, postoperative satisfaction score, postoperative alignment, statistical significance, as well as other variables, were extracted for analysis. An Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) design-specific scale was used for assessing randomized control trials (RCTs). The nonrandomized control trials were evaluated by using the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was also used to assess cohort studies, while case series were evaluated using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.

Results

The initial search identified 316 studies, of which 178 were considered for screening. Eleven studies completely fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including one RCT, five nonrandomized control trials/quasi-experiments, three case series, and two cohort studies. The total number of patients recruited for MA TKA was 1740. Conversely, 497 patients were enrolled for KA TKA. Five studies used the visual analogue scale (VAS) for assessing postoperative patient satisfaction, four used the Knee Society Score (KSS) 2011 version and two Likert-based types of scores. Overall, the highest mean satisfaction score of KSS 2011 was 31.5 ± 6.6 in the MA group, and 29.8 ± 80 in the KA group in four studies. All of them showed high postoperative patient satisfaction rates for both MA and KA TKA, but with no statistically significant difference between them (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty, as well as kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty led to high rates of postoperative patient satisfaction, with no statistically significant differences between them.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review.

Comparison of Six-Week, Three-Month, and One-Year Postoperative Clinical Results of Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in Primary Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common surgical solution for severe osteoarthritis. Kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) are two popular techniques. There is ongoing debate over the optimal method, influenced by varying long-term results and a scarcity of data on short-term postoperative outcomes. Early evaluation of these techniques is vital for improving rehabilitation outcomes and ensuring patient satisfaction.  Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes from 71 KA-TKRs and 85 MA-TKRs performed between 2019 and 2021. Knee flexion, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, EuroQol-5d (EQ-5d) quality of life measures, and dependence on walking aids were evaluated. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, six-weeks, three-months, and 12-months postoperatively using two-sample t-tests for continuous data and Pearson's chi-squared test for categorical data.

RESULTS

At six-weeks and three-months postoperatively, the KA group exhibited significantly better outcomes in knee flexion (98.6° vs. 90.2° at six-weeks; 114.7° vs. 94.2° at three-months), pain management, and reduced walking aids compared to the MA group. By 12-months, these differences were no longer significant, with both groups showing comparable results in knee flexion, pain scores, and patient-reported outcomes.  Conclusion: KA offers substantial short-term advantages over MA for pain relief, increased knee flexion, and independence from walking aids. However, these benefits do not persist at one-year post-surgery, indicating a convergence of outcomes between the two techniques. Larger studies with extended follow-ups are required to determine the long-term implications of these alignment strategies.

Evaluating axial alignment and knee phenotypes in a young Indian population, using X-rays converted to three-dimensional bone models, and their relevance in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The standard principle of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) targeted by most orthopaedicians is the alignment of the lower limb in a neutral mechanical axis. However, for several patients the neutral mechanical alignment is not normal. Aligning these patients to a neutral mechanical axis may not result in desirable outcomes as it may feel unnatural. This study aimed to discover what percentage of the young healthy Indian population have a neutral hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA = 180°) and what percentage of this population have a deviation from the neutral HKA. We also studied the distribution of knee phenotypes in this non-arthritic population.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 196 lower limbs were evaluated from 100 subjects, between the ages of 20 and 35 years, without any history of lower limb pathology, of which 50 were males and 50 were females. All volunteers were subjected to full-leg standing anteroposterior and lateral digital radiographs on which various alignment parameters were analysed. Three-dimensional bone models were generated using a validated software.

RESULTS

125 limbs (63.7%) from the total population lay in the range of 180 ± 3°; 7.14% (14/196) of the total limbs had an HKA angle of 180°; 29.5% (58/196) of the total population had a varus alignment, i.e., HKA angle of ≤176° and 6.6% (13/196) had knees in valgus alignment, i.e., HKA angle of ≥184°. Thirty-four percent (33/96) of limbs in men and 25% (25/100) of limbs in women had constitutional varus knees with an alignment of ≤176°; 5.2% (5) of limbs in men and 8% (8) of limbs in women had constitutional valgus knees with an alignment of ≥184°; 67/96 knees in males and 58 knees in females were in the range of 180 ± 3°.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant portion of the normal population had limbs that deviated from the neutral HKA. If these subjects were to need TKA in the future, it would not be desirable to restore their alignment to its neutral.

Methodological Assessment of the 100 Most-Cited Articles in Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Last Decade Compared to the All-Time List

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been driven by a growing focus on evidence-based medicine. This transition is reflected in the critical appraisal of both, the quality of work and the potential impact on the orthopedic community. The purpose of our study was to (1) identify the top 100 most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade and from all-time, and (2) compare methodological rigor of the most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade to articles all-time by level of evidence.

METHODS

The top 100 cited articles were recorded for manuscripts from the last decade, January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022, and manuscripts from all-time for TKA. We collected authors, year of publication, journal of the article, country of origin of authors, article type (basic science article, clinical research article), level of evidence, methodological index for non-randomized studies score, physiotherapy evidence database scale, and citation density (total citations/years published).

RESULTS

The largest number of studies for all-time TKA (53.0%) and decade TKA (42.0%) were Level III. The average methodological index for non-randomized studies score for comparative studies was 18.7 for all-time TKA and 20.7 for decade TKA (P < .001). The average physiotherapy evidence database score was 6.1 for all-time TKA and 8.1 for decade TKA (P > .05). The highest citation density for all-time TKA was 111 and for past decade was 63. The number of level II studies in TKA increased from 19.0% from all time to 38.0% from the last decade (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings of improved methodologies over time reflect positive steps toward evidence-based practice in TKA. A continued focus on producing methodologically sound studies may guide evidence-based clinical decision-making.

High Expectations Among Patients Who Have Undergone TKA Do Not Correlate With Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

One of five patients is dissatisfied with the outcome of TKA. With the increasing number of TKAs, this affects many patients. It has been suggested that high expectations may influence satisfaction, but the relationship between preoperative patient expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction remains poorly understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Are preoperative patient expectations correlated with postoperative satisfaction? (2) Are expectations correlated with patient characteristics or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)? (3) Is satisfaction correlated with patient characteristics or PROMs? (4) Do patients report specific items as more relevant to their expectations?

METHODS

This was a single-center, observational, retrospective, comparative study involving patients who underwent TKA. Between December 2020 and June 2022, three senior surgeons performed 306 TKAs. Of these, 76% (234) had the preoperative PROMs required for this study, and of these, 82% (193) had completed PROMs at the 12-month follow-up interval and were analyzed. Of the 193 included patients, 53% (102) were women; the mean age was 68 ± 9 years. Data were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months. Twelve months of follow-up has been shown to be adequate in studies with PROMs. Patient expectations were measured using the validated Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher expectations. We also assessed patient satisfaction, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Forgotten Joint Score, High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, EQ-5D-3L, and the objective Knee Society Score. Bivariate linear correlations were analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman test.

RESULTS

Preoperative patient expectations did not correlate with postoperative satisfaction. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey score was 82 ±16 points and did not correlate with satisfaction at either 4 months (r = -0.061; p = 0.42) or 12 months (r = -0.126; p = 0.11). Expectations did not correlate with patient characteristics or any of the preoperative or postoperative PROMs or the Knee Society Score. Patient satisfaction was 88% (158 of 179) at 4 months and 83% (160 of 193) at 12 months and did not correlate with patient characteristics or any of the preoperative PROMs or Knee Society Score. Patient satisfaction was medium to strongly correlated with postoperative PROMs and Knee Society Score. The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey items with the most frequent expected improvement were "ability to walk" (99% [192 of 193]), "go downstairs" (99% [191 of 192]), and "go upstairs" (99% [192 of 193]).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative expectations were not correlated with postoperative satisfaction or PROMs. Surgeons should be aware that patients have high expectations. However, these expectations appear to be less relevant in determining postoperative satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Preoperative phenotype has no significant impact on the clinical outcomes and long-term survival of mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty in Asian patients with osteoarthritis

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of phenotypes in Asian patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and assess whether the phenotype affected the clinical outcome and survival of mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We also compared the survival of the group in which the phenotype unintentionally remained unchanged with those in which it was corrected to neutral.

Methods

The study involved 945 TKAs, which were performed in 641 patients with primary OA, between January 2000 and January 2009. These were classified into 12 phenotypes based on the combined assessment of four categories of the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and three categories of actual joint line obliquity. The rates of survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test. The Hospital for Special Surgery score and survival of each phenotype were compared with those of the reference phenotype with neutral alignment and a parallel joint line. We also compared long-term survival between the unchanged phenotype group and the corrected to neutral alignment-parallel joint line group in patients with Type IV-b (mild to moderate varus alignment-parallel joint line) phenotype.

Results

The most common phenotype was Type I-b (mild to moderate varus alignment-medial joint line; 27.1% (n = 256)), followed by Type IV-b (23.2%; n = 219). There was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and long-term survival between the groups. In Type IV-b phenotypes, the neutrally corrected group showed higher 15-year survival compared with the unchanged-phenotype group (94.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.0 to 97.8) vs 74.2% (95% CI 98.0 to 100); p = 0.020).

Conclusion

Constitutional varus was confirmed in more than half of these patients. Mechanically aligned TKA can achieve consistent clinical outcomes and long-term survival, regardless of the patient's phenotype. The neutrally corrected group had better long-term survival compared with the unchanged phenotype group.

Tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment restores bony phenotypes and joint line obliquity in a great majority of varus and straight knees and normalises valgus and severe varus deformities

PURPOSE

The present study focuses on testing the capability of a restricted tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment technique (PSA) to restore bony morphology and phenotypes.

METHODS

Three-hundred and sixty-seven patients were treated with navigated total knee arthroplasty and tibia-first gap-balanced PSA technique. Boundaries for medial proximal tibial angle were 86°-92°, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle 86°-92°, and hip-knee-ankle angle 175°-183°. Knees were classified by coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK), with subsequent analyses comparing pre- and postoperative distributions. Phenotype classification within CPAK groups assessed pre- and postoperative distributions.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the largest CPAK group was type II (30.8%), followed by type I (20.5%) and type V (17.8%). Postoperatively, type II remained the largest group (39%), followed by type V (30%). All groups with varus/valgus deformities (I, III, IV and VI) became smaller. While in straight legs (II, IV), the CPAK was restored in more than 70%-75%, in varus groups (I, IV) in 40%-50% and in valgus (III and VI) in 5%-18%. The joint line obliquity remained the same in the majority of knees (straight >75%; varus 63%-80%; valgus VI 95%), with the exception of CPAK III (40%). The phenotype analysis showed for straight legs a phenotype restoration of 85%, for varus 94% and for valgus 37%. Joint line convergence angle was reduced significantly in all groups from 1.8°-4.3° preoperatively to 0.6°-1.2° postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

PSA restores bony phenotypes and joint line obliquity in the majority of straight and varus knees, while most of the valgus and extreme varus knees are normalised.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Superiority of kinematic alignment over mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty during medium- to long-term follow-up: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

PURPOSE

To compare and determine the reliability and conclusiveness of the medium- and long-term efficacy in terms of patient-reported outcome measures and the risk of revisions or reoperations (RRRs) of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Database Library to identify relevant literature. Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) published before July 2023 were included. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and RRR were compared. Additionally, OKS and RRR were subjected to a trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving 572 knees were identified. The pooled analysis of the included studies demonstrated that KA showed better medium-term WOMAC and OKS (mean difference [MD] = -6.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.52 to -2.99, p < 0.05 and MD = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.05-2.15, p < 0.05), respectively), but no significant differences were observed in the long-term follow-up (MD = 2.1, 95% CI: -3.21 to 7.31, not significant [n.s.] and MD = 0.01, 95% CI: -2.43 to 2.46, n.s., respectively). FJS (standardised MD = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.19, n.s.) and RRR (risk ratio = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.74, n.s.) showed no significant intergroup differences (n.s.). The evidence quality ranged from moderate to high, and the trial sequential analysis indicated the need for additional high-quality RCTs to draw more conclusive results.

CONCLUSIONS

KA showed better medium-term WOMAC and OKS, while KA and MA had similar FJS without increasing the RRR in medium- and long-term follow-up. Further research is needed for more conclusive results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II (meta-analyses).

Preoperative Joint Distraction Imaging and Planning Protocol for Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Current preoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) planning strategies are bone-referencing and do not consider the ligamentous profile of the knee. This study assessed the mean Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle of the planned Distracted Alignment (DA), an alignment output using a joint distraction radiology and planning protocol, which incorporates preoperative evaluation of ligament laxity.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 144 knees undergoing TKA was performed. Each patient received a preoperative computer tomograph scan, a weight-bearing antero-posterior knee radiograph, and distracted knee radiographs in extension and flexion. The imaging was used to develop a preoperative DA plan aiming for medio-lateral and extension-flexion space balance. The mean DA, weight-bearing, and arithmetic HKA angles were compared to each other, and to the HKA of a healthy nonarthritic population.

RESULTS

The mean weight-bearing, arithmetic, and planned DA HKA angles were 4.8° (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5°) varus, 0.4° (IQR 4.5°) varus, and 2.2° (IQR 4.0°) varus, respectively. This compares to a healthy adult HKA angle of 1.3° varus. The difference between the planned DA and arithmetic HKA angles was greater than 3° for 36% of the patients in the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

The planned DA HKA angle was fundamentally different from the arithmetic HKA angle, but comparable to a healthy population. Considering both hard and soft tissue information of the knee, we believe the planned DA resulting from the joint distraction radiology protocol allows for optimized preoperative surgical planning in TKA. This protocol has been shown to be clinically viable.

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and medial pivot (MP) knee designs already showed superior outcomes in independent comparative studies. The objective of this study was to assess whether rKA with MP TKA provides better clinical and functional outcomes compared to mechanical alignment (MA) with MP TKA.

METHODS

This is a randomised, parallel two group study involving a total of 98 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomly allocated to either rKA or MA TKA procedures conducted with a MP prothesis using patient-specific instruments between 2017 and 2020. Final follow-up was at 2 years postoperatively. Demographic data and clinical and functional scores (Oxford knee score, knee society score [KSS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], forgotten joint score [FJS]) were collected and compared preoperative, 1 year postoperative and 2 years postoperative. Coronal plane alignment of the knee and functional knee phenotype classification were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (rKA) and 51 patients (MA) were included in final analysis. Superior joint awareness scores (FJS) were found at 1 year postoperative for rKA (62.2 vs. 52.4, p = 0.04). KSS subscores (expectation score, satisfaction score) improved with rKA with significant differences at both 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Major differences between rKA and MA were found in subgroup analysis of varus and neutral CPAK phenotypes. Both 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, FJS was significantly better in KA compared with MA in varus CPAK phenotypes (63.1 vs. 44.9, p = 0.03; 71.1 vs. 46.0, p = 0.005). Further clinical and functional scores showed improvement in the varus CPAK phenotypes with predominantly significant improvement in the expectation and satisfaction KSS subscores. No significant differences were found in the comparison of rKA and MA in neutral CPAK phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

The rKA of MP TKA design shows superior patient satisfaction and self-reported function when compared to MA MP TKA. Furthermore, rKA MP TKA shows superior joint awareness at early postoperative stage. The most important clinical relevance of this study is the clear superiority of rKA in varus phenotypes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Comparative analysis of radiation exposure in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using popular robotic systems

Robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) is a rapidly emerging technique that has been shown to improve precision and accuracy in implant alignment in TKA. Robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) uses computer software to create a three-dimensional model of the patient's knee. Different types of preoperative imaging, including radiographs and CT scans, are used to create these models, each with varying levels of radiation exposure. This study aims to determine the radiation dose associated with each type of imaging used in RATKA, to inform patients of the potential risks. A retrospective search of our clinical radiology and arthroplasty database was conducted to identify 140 knees. The patients were divided into three groups based on the type of preoperative imaging they received: (1) CT image-based MAKO Protocol, (2) Antero-posterior long leg alignment films (LLAF), (3) standard AP, lateral, and skyline knee radiographs. The dose of CT imaging technique for each knee was measured using the dose-length product (DLP) with units of mGycm2, whereas the measurement for XRAY images was with the dose area product (DAP) with units of Gycm2. The mean radiation dose for patients in the CT (MAKO protocol) image-based group was 1135 mGy.cm2. The mean radiation dose for patients in the LLAF group was 3081 Gycm2. The mean radiation dose for patients undergoing knee AP/lateral and skyline radiographs was the lowest of the groups, averaging 4.43 Gycm2. Through an ANOVA and post hoc analysis, the results between groups was statistically significant. In this study, we found a significant difference in radiation exposure between standard knee radiographs, LLAF and CT imaging. Nonetheless, the radiation dose for all groups is still within acceptable safety limits.

The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality Rehabilitation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Extended reality (XR), including virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality, has been increasingly used in postoperative rehabilitation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of XR-based rehabilitation in TKA compared to conventional rehabilitation.

METHODS

In this study, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to February 15, 2023 for eligible studies. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials with 989 patients were included in our study. The primary outcomes were pain and function. The secondary outcomes were anxiety and quality of life. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The pooled data indicated XR-based rehabilitation significantly improved the visual analog scale (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.31, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] [-0.47 to -0.15], P = .0001), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (SMD = -0.46, 95% CI [-0.86 to -0.06], P = .02), range of motion (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI [0.09 to 0.72], P = .01), and anxiety scores (mean difference = -3.95, 95% CI [-7.76 to -0.13], P = .04) than conventional rehabilitation, but Timed Up and Go test and quality of life were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found XR-based rehabilitation improved pain, function, and anxiety, but not quality of life in TKA compared to conventional rehabilitation within 1 month postoperatively. Based on the pooled results, we suggested that XR-based rehabilitation may have benefit in patients' postoperative rehabilitation in TKA.

Ten Flaws of Systematic Mechanical Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty

Mechanical alignment (MA) and its tenets have been considered essential for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) success since they were introduced in 1973. However, over time, there have been colossal advances in our knowledge and understanding of the anatomy and kinematics of the knee, as well as in surgical precision and implants. However, the MA systematic principles of prosthetic arthroplasty and implant position related to the lower-extremity mechanical axis, have only recently been called into question. The high rates of dissatisfaction and residual pain reported after MA TKA prompted this questioning, and that leaves plenty of room for improvement. Despite the general consensus that there is great variability between patients' anatomy, it is still the norm to carry out a systematic operation that does not consider individual variations. Evolving to a more personalized arthroplasty surgery was proposed as a rational and reasonable option to improve patient outcomes. Transitioning to a personalized TKA approach requires questioning and even disregarding certain MA TKA principles. Based on current knowledge, we can state that certain principles are erroneous or unfounded. The aim of this narrative review was to discuss and challenge 10 previously accepted, yet we believe, flawed, principles of MA, and to present an alternative concept, which is rooted in personalized TKA techniques.

Why Kinematic Alignment Makes Little Sense in Valgus Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Narrative Review

There is a debate about the best alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical alignment (MA) targets in combination with necessary soft tissue releases are the gold standard for TKA in end-stage valgus osteoarthritis. Some authors propagate kinematic alignment (KA) with the aim of restoring the patient's native alignment and minimizing the need for soft tissue releases. Our previous studies showed that MA with standardized soft tissue release produces reproducible results, and that the preoperative phenotype does not influence the results of patients with valgus osteoarthritis. These data suggest that there is no functional advantage to preserving valgus alignment in patients with valgus osteoarthritis. Many patients with valgus osteoarthritis present with a compromised medial collateral ligament and leaving the knee in valgus could increase the risk of secondary instability. The current literature supports MA TKA with soft tissue release as the gold standard. While using more sophisticated enabling technologies like robotic surgery might allow for aiming for very slight (1-2°) valgus alignment on the femoral side, any valgus alignment outside this range should be avoided. This review paper summarizes our current knowledge on the surgical techniques of TKA in patients with valgus osteoarthritis.

Only 26% of Native Knees Show an Identical Coronal Functional Knee Phenotype in the Contralateral Knee

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive exploration evaluating left-to-right knee symmetry across all anatomical planes utilizing three-dimensional (3D) scans stands absent from the existing body of research. Therefore, the primary objectives of this investigation involved examining potential differences and resemblances in alignment and structure between left and right non-osteoarthritic (native) knees in various planes (coronal, sagittal, and axial) using three-dimensional single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) images.

METHODS

A total of 282 native knees from 141 patients were retrospectively gathered from the hospital's records. Patients, aged between 16 and 45, who underwent Tc99m-methyl diphosphonate SPECT/CT scans for both knees, adhering to the Imperial Knee Protocol, were included. A statistical analysis was conducted, including 23 knee morphometric parameters, comparing left and right knees, and classifying them based on functional knee phenotypes across the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes.

RESULTS

Regarding the functional coronal knee phenotype, 26% of patients (n = 37) exhibited identical phenotypes in both knees (p < 0.001). Significant correlated similarities between the left and right knees were observed in the coronal plane (Pearson's r = 0.76, 0.68, 0.76, 0.76, p < 0.001) and in several morphometric measures in the sagittal plane (Pearson's r = 0.92, 0.72, 0.64, p < 0.001). Moderately correlated similarities were noted in the axial plane (Pearson's r = 0.43, 0.44, 0.43, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 26% of native knees exhibit an identical coronal phenotype in their contralateral knee, whereas 67% have the adjacent coronal phenotype. Strongly correlated resemblances were established across various left and right knee morphometric parameters in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. These findings could enhance decisions in procedures like total knee arthroplasties or osteotomies, where alignment is key to outcomes, and reveal a potential for future artificial intelligence-driven models to improve our understanding and improve personalized treatment strategies for knee osteoarthritis.

The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is a reliable landmark for 3° varus tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty: a radiological evaluation on 1296 cases

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and the accuracy of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (DTFS) as landmark to perform controlled varus tibial resections during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that DTFS can be used to perform an accurate 3° varus tibial cut.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis on a consecutive series of standard weightbearing full-length anteroposterior views of the lower limbs radiographic images was conducted. For each radiograph, the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, the angle between the tibial mechanical axis and the line connecting the centre of the tibial spines and the DTFS (tibiofibular angle, TFA) and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were calculated. Each measurement was carried out twice by three independent observers, and intra- and inter-observer measurement reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1296 lower limbs were analysed from a series of 648 weightbearing full-length anteroposterior radiographs. The ICC were > 90% for all measurements. The mean TFA value was 2.94 ± 0.68 (range 2.38-3.51). No differences were detected comparing the mean TFA value on the right and left limb (p = 0.795) as well as comparing the values in male and female patients (p = 0.691). Linear regression analysis did not find statistically significant correlation between TFA and MPTA, or TFA and HKA angles, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is a reliable and easy reproducible radiographic landmark that can be used when planning a 3° varus tibial cut. Future studies are needed to confirm the validity of this method also in clinical settings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective case series.

Comparing Outcomes of Bicruciate-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore normal kinematics by replicating the function of both cruciate ligaments. Conventional cruciate-retaining (CR) design in TKA has shown previous clinical success with lower complication rates. This study compared the patient-reported outcomes between the BCS and CR TKA designs.

Methods

This retrospective study examined patients who underwent primary TKA using a CR or a BCS implant. Patient demographics, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were compared between two cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed using independent samples t-tests.

Results

There were no significant preoperative demographic differences between groups. The CR cohort (n = 756) had significantly higher average KOOS, JR Scores compared to the BCS cohort (n = 652) at 3 months (59.7 ± 3.8 vs. 53.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.001) and 2 years (62.6 ± 8.0 vs. 53.8 ± 6.7, p = 0.001) after TKA. Within the cohort, KOOS, JR delta differences were not significant for CR when comparing patient scores 3 months to 1 year after surgery. Meanwhile, the BCS patients did show significant delta improvement (4.1 ± 1.9, p = 0.030) when compared 3 months to 1 year after surgery. One year postoperatively, the BCS cohort (n = 134) showed a significantly higher average FJS score (49.5 ± 31.4, vs. 36.8 ± 28.5, p = 0.028) than the CR cohort (n = 203). Both cohorts displayed a significant difference in delta improvements within their respective cohort when measuring FJS from 3 months to 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery.

Conclusions

The CR cohort performed better on average, compared to the BCS cohort in measures of KOOS, JR scores at the 2-year follow-up. The BCS cohort performed marginally better regarding FJS only at 1-year follow-up.

Patients Consistently Report Worse Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between primary TKA (pTKA) and revision TKA (rTKA) have not been well-studied. Therefore, we compared pTKA and rTKA patients by the rates of achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W).

METHODS

A total of 2,448 patients (2,239 pTKAs/209 rTKAs) were retrospectively studied. Patients who completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patient-reported outcome measures and MCID-I/MCID-W rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models measured relationships between surgery type and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent rTKA (all causes) had lower rates of improvement and higher rates of worsening compared to pTKA patients for KOOS-PS (MCID-I: 54 versus 68%, P < .001; MCID-W: 18 versus 8.6%, P < .001), PF10a (MCID-I: 44 versus 65%, P < .001; MCID-W: 22 versus 11%, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-I: 34 versus 45%, P = .005), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 51 versus 60%, P = .014; MCID-W: 29 versus 14%, P < .001). Undergoing revision was predictive of worsening postoperatively for KOOS-PS, PF10a, and PROMIS Global-Physical compared to pTKA. Postoperative scores were significantly higher for all 4 PROMs following pTKA.

CONCLUSION

Patients reported significantly less improvement and higher rates of worsening following rTKA, particularly for PROMs that assessed physical function. Although pTKA patients did better overall, the improvement rates may be considered relatively low and should prompt discussions on improving outcomes following pTKA and rTKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The use of virtual reality to assess the bony landmarks at the knee joint - The role of imaging modality and the assessor's experience

BACKGROUND

At present, extended reality technologies such as virtual reality (VR) have gained popularity in orthopedic surgery. The first aim of this study was to assess the precision of VR and other imaging modalities - computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - to localize bony landmarks near the knee joint. Secondly, the impact of the educational level of the assessor - medical master students, orthopedic residents, and orthopedic surgeons - on the precision with which landmarks near the knee joint could be localized was analyzed.

METHODS

We included a total of 77 participants: 62 medical master students, 10 orthopedic residents, and 5 orthopedic surgeons to analyze three cadaver legs. Every participant localized a series of sixteen bony landmarks on six different imaging modalities (CT, MRI, 3D-CT, 3D-MRI, VR-CT, VR-MRI).

RESULTS

Concerning the imaging modality, the inter- and intra-observer variability were lowest for 3D and VR, higher for MRI (respectively 7.6 mm and 6.9 mm), and highest for CT (respectively 9 mm and 8.7 m).Concerning the educational level of the assessor, inter- and intra-observer variability in VR were lowest for surgeons, (respectively 3.2 mm and 3.6 mm), higher for residents (respectively 5.9 mm and 6.5 mm) and medical students (respectively 5.9 mm and 5.8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

VR can be considered a reliable imaging technique. Localization of landmarks tends to be more precise in VR and on 3D than on conventional CT and MRI images. Furthermore, orthopedic surgeons localize landmarks more precisely than orthopedic residents and medical students in VR.

Restricted kinematic alignment is clinically non-inferior to mechanical alignment in the short and mid-term: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, kinematic alignment (KA) is becoming a valid alternative to mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, to avoid early failures, the restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) approach has been developed to restore native knee kinematics without reproducing extreme knee phenotype. This systematic review aims to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes between rKA and MA for TKA.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines on Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane Library. The following search string was adopted: (((restricted kinematic) AND (mechanical)) AND (alignment)) AND (knee). We included studies that analyzed rKA versus MA in terms of clinical outcomes and complications with a minimum of 6 months of follow up. The following rKA- and MA-related data were evaluated: patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs), radiographic analysis of lower limb alignment, and complications. Criteria from the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies were used to assess the methodological quality of the articles.

RESULTS

This systematic review included seven clinical studies with a total of 892 knees (471 for MA group and 421 for rKA group, respectively). Overall, post-operative PROMs were similar between rKA and MA. Moreover, rKA reached better results regarding Forgotten Joint Score and post-operative patient satisfaction. Finally, no higher complication rate was observed with the rKA approach.

CONCLUSION

The rKA aims to restore native knee kinematics, avoiding extreme deformities. Clinical outcomes are not inferior or even better for rKA compared with MA, without increasing the risk of short-middle-term implant failure. However, there is a high heterogeneity regarding the 'restricted' protocols used.

Medial tibial bone resorption following total knee arthroplasty comparing a traditional with a kinematic design

BACKGROUND

New total knee prostheses are being designed to improve clinical outcome, survivorship and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A new knee system was developed with improvements in patellofemoral joint, trochlear geometry, polyethylene formulation and tibial baseplate. Aim of this study was to compare the newer kinematic knee system with its existing predecessor knee system in terms of clinical outcome, revision rates, radiographic outcomes specifically medial tibial bone resorption.

METHODS

The prospective matched-pair study included 88 TKA surgeries using newer kinematic design knee prostheses, performed between January 2015 and December 2016, out of which 82 patients were available for final follow-up. The control cohort of 82 traditional TKA prosthesis was matched in terms of age, gender and body mass index. All surgeries were performed by the single surgeon using medial parapatellar arthrotomy and posterior stabilized implants were used. Clinical outcomes were assessed using knee society score, range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain and crepitation. Radiological examinations included recording of radiolucent lines and medial tibial bone resorption.

RESULTS

At the 5-year follow-up, no significant differences were noted in terms of mean knee society score (93.3 ± 6.6 vs 94.2 ± 8.1), knee function score (88.5 ± 10.5 vs 89.1 ± 11.2) and ROM. The incidences of anterior knee pain and crepitation were lower in the newer group (8.5% vs 21.9% and 14.6% vs 32.9%, respectively) compared to the traditional prosthesis group. No cases of aseptic loosening were observed in either cohort. No significant difference was seen in terms of radiolucent lines (29.3% vs 26.8%) and medial tibial resorption (2.43% in each group) incidences.

CONCLUSIONS

At the 5 years follow-up no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes, except the former proved to be better for anterior knee pain and crepitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections Into a Preexisting Total Knee Arthroplasty are Associated With Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision

Background

This study aims to determine the risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and revision associated with injecting a preexisting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with intra-articular corticosteroids (IACSs).

Methods

The PearlDiver database was used to identify patients who underwent elective, primary TKA between 2015 and 2019. Patients who received IACS injections into the ipsilateral knee within 1 year after their primary TKA were matched 2:1 on age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index and compared to a no-injection control group. The incidence of PJI at 1 year postoperatively and revision at 2 years postoperatively were compared between groups.

Results

A total of 27,059 patients were in the injection cohort and 54,116 patients in the control cohort. The overall PJI rate was 1.3% in the injection cohort and 0.8% in the control cohort (P < .001). The rate of PJI increased with the number of post-TKA IACS injections received: 1 injection (1.3%), 2 injections (1.4%), and >3 injections (1.8%) (P < .001 for all, compared to controls). The revision rate was 3.1% in the injection cohort and 1.3% in the control cohort (P < .001). Revision rates increased with the number of post-TKA IACS injections received: 1 injection (2.5%), 2 injections (4.2%), and >3 injections (7.3%) (P < .001 for all, compared to controls).

Conclusions

IACS injections into a preexisting TKA are associated with an incremental increased risk of prosthetic joint infection and revision. Considering the potential deleterious impact of PJI and complexity of revision procedures, IACS injections into a preexisting TKA should be strongly discouraged.

Comparison of knee kinematics and ligament forces in single and multi-radius cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A computer simulation study

BACKGROUND

The single-radius design in total knee arthroplasty has been designed to develop a more fixed flexion-extension axis without mid-flexion instability compared with the multi-radius design. It remains unclear whether differences between the multi-radius and single-radius designs can affect kinematics and collateral ligament forces. This study aimed to simulate knee kinematics and kinetics between single-radius and multi-radius models using a musculoskeletal computer model.

METHODS

The single-radius and multi-radius femoral components were virtually implanted in a computer simulation using the same tibial insert. The effects of implant design on kinematics and medial collateral ligament forces during squatting and gait activities were analyzed.

RESULTS

During squatting, the multi-radius model exhibited paradoxical anterior translation on both the medial and lateral flexion facet center where peak anterior translation was 2.4 mm for medial flexion facet center and 2.2 mm for the lateral flexion facet center, while the peak anterior translation of the single-radius model was less than 1 mm at early flexion. A rapid decrease in medial collateral ligament tension was observed in the early flexion phase in the multi-radius model, which occurred simultaneously with paradoxical anterior translation, whereas the relatively constant medial collateral ligament tension was observed in the single-radius model. During gait activity, the single-radius model exhibited a more posterior position than the multi-radius model.

CONCLUSION

These suggest that abrupt changes in the medial collateral ligament force influence anterior sliding of the femur, and that the single-radius design is a reasonable choice for prevention of mid-flexion instability.

Learning curve analysis of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a Chinese surgical system

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the learning curve of total operative time, bone cutting accuracy, and limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a Chinese image-based knee surgery robot known as HURWA. Additionally, a comparison was conducted with conventional TKA to ascertain the benefits of robotic-assisted TKA.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed a series of patients (n = 90) who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the HURWA robot between December 2021 and October 2022. The procedures were performed by one of three orthopedic surgeons with varying levels of experience. As a control group, we selected the last 30 conventional TKA cases performed by each of these three surgeons. To determine the learning curve, we recorded the operative time, bone cutting error, and pre- and post-surgery radiographs.

RESULTS

The study found no significant differences in total operative time, bone cutting accuracy, or limb alignment among the three surgeons. Of the three surgeons, surgeon 1, who had the most experience in joint arthroplasty, reached the learning curve in case 8, with the shortest bone cutting time and robot time. Surgeon 2 reached the learning curve in case 16, while surgeon 3 reached the learning curve in case 9. There was no observable learning curve effect for bone cutting accuracy and limb alignment. However, the percentage of cases where limb alignment differed from preoperative planning by 3° or less was higher in robotic-assisted TKA (77.97%) than in conventional TKA (47.19%).

CONCLUSION

The study determined that the learning curve for robotic-assisted TKA using the HURWA knee surgery robot ranged from 8 to 20 cases. No observable learning curve effect was detected for bone cutting accuracy or limb alignment. Experienced surgeons using the HURWA robot for bone cutting took less time and reached the learning curve earlier. The HURWA robot achieved better limb alignment without depending on the experience of conventional TKA.

Definitions and consequences of current alignment techniques and phenotypes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) - there is no winner yet

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been extensively documented and it was attributed to numerous factors. In recent years, significant focus has been directed towards implant alignment and stability as potential causes and solutions to this issue. Surgeons are now exploring a more personalized approach to TKA, recognizing the importance of thoroughly understanding each individual patient's anatomy and functional morphology. A more comprehensive preoperative analysis of alignment and knee morphology is essential to address the unresolved questions in knee arthroplasty effectively. The crucial task of determining the most appropriate alignment strategy for each patient arises, given the substantial variability in bone resection resulting from the interplay of phenotype and the alignment strategy chosen. This review aims to comprehensively present the definitions of different alignment techniques in all planes and discuss the consequences dependent on knee phenotypes.Level of evidence V.

High degree of alignment precision associated with total knee arthroplasty performed using a surgical robot or handheld navigation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the precision of bony resections during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using different computer-assisted technologies.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a primary TKA using an imageless accelerometer-based handheld navigation system (KneeAlign2®, OrthAlign Inc.) or computed tomography-based large-console surgical robot (Mako®, Stryker Corp.) from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Templated alignment targets and demographic data were collected. Coronal plane alignment of the femoral and tibial components and tibial slope were measured on postoperative radiographs. Patients with excessive flexion or rotation preventing accurate measurement were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients who underwent TKA using either a handheld (n = 120) or robotic (n = 120) system were included. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, and BMI between groups. A small but statistically significant difference in the precision of the distal femoral resection was observed between the handheld and robotic cohorts (1.5° vs. 1.1° difference between templated and measured alignments, p = 0.024), though this is likely clinically insignificant. There were no significant differences in the precision of the tibial resection between the handheld and robotic groups (coronal plane 0.9° vs. 1.0°, n.s.; sagittal plane 1.2° vs. 1.1°, n.s.). There were no significant differences in the rate of overall precision between cohorts (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

A high degree of component alignment precision was observed for both imageless handheld navigation and CT-based robotic cohorts. Surgeons considering options for computer-assisted TKA should take other important factors, including surgical principles, templating software, ligament balancing, intraoperative adjustability, equipment logistics, and cost, into account.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Alignment strategy for different types of varus knee with generic instruments: Mechanical alignment or kinematic alignment?

OBJECTIVE

A thorough examination of the available approaches is crucial to comprehensively understand the variance among the alignment strategies employed in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we assessed the functional outcomes during the perioperative and postoperative periods of TKA in patients using generic instruments with varus knee to compare the mechanical alignment (MA) and kinematic alignment (KA) procedures.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College who had undergone unilateral TKA between November 2019 and April 2021 were included. The patients with varus knee deformity were categorized into two groups [type I (n = 64) and type IV (n = 63)] based on the modified coronal plane alignment of the knee (mCPAK) classification. The type I and IV groups were further subdivided into MA (n = 30 and n = 32) and KA subgroups (n = 34 and n = 21), respectively. The clinical information collected included sex, surgical side, age, body mass index, and perioperative data [including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification]. All patients were monitored for 12 months post-surgery to evaluate the recovery of knee joint function. During this period, the Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and the active range of motion (AROM) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were compared at different time points, i.e., before the operation and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-operation. Additionally, the patients' subjective experiences were assessed at 6 and 12 months post-surgery using Forgotten Joint Score Knee (FJS-12 Knee), while complications were recorded throughout the monitoring period.

RESULTS

No significant variances were observed in ASA classification, operation duration, blood loss volume during surgery, and hospital stay length between the patients who underwent KA TKA and those who received MA TKA (P > 0.05). During the initial 6 weeks post-operation, the KA group exhibited a significantly reduced average VAS pain score (P < 0.05), with no such differences at 6 months and 1 year after the surgery (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the KA group had significantly higher scores on the KOOS JR at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year following the surgery (P < 0.05). Moreover, the AROM score of the KA group significantly improved only at 6 weeks after the surgery (P < 0.05); however, no prominent differences were found at 6 months and 1 year after the operation (P > 0.05). The KA cohort also exhibited a significant increase in FJS-12 Knee at 1 year following the operation (P < 0.05), whereas no such difference was detected at 6 months following the surgery (P > 0.05). Thus, compared to the MA method, the KA procedure provided pain relief and improved active motion range within 6 weeks after the surgery in patients undergoing TKA. Further, the KOOS JR exhibited significant increases at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year while the FJS-12 Knee demonstrated a significant increase at 1 year after the KA TKA procedure.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, our study results suggest that the KA approach can be considered in patients using generic instruments with varus alignment of the knee, particularly those with mCPAK type I and IV varus knees, to help improve patient satisfaction.

Individual Phenotype Does Not Impact the Outcome of Mechanical Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties for Valgus Osteoarthritis

Background and Objectives: There is an ongoing discussion about the best alignment targets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical alignment has been the standard in TKA for years. Alongside the development of various classification systems to describe the native alignment of the knee (knee phenotype), kinematic alignment restoring the individual phenotype of the knee has been advocated more recently. Alignment in TKA becomes even more challenging in knees with preoperative deformities such as valgus osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: The study retrospectively evaluated 158 knees in 135 patients who underwent TKA with a mechanical alignment target for valgus osteoarthritis. Pre- and postoperative hip knee angle, lateral distal femur angle, and medial proximal tibial angle/tibial plate angle (pre-/postoperative) were measured on standing hip-to-ankle radiographs. Knees were grouped according to the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-related outcome measures (WOMAC, UCLA, SF-12, pain) were assessed. Results: There was no difference in outcome for mechanically aligned TKA between the different CPAK phenotypes, suggesting that mechanical alignment is an appropriate target for the different phenotypes analyzed in the study. Remaining valgus alignment was associated with decreased postoperative UCLA scores and decreased improvement in SF-12 scores (p = 0.011/p = 0.028). Within CPAK III, mechanical aligned TKA showed better postoperative UCLA Scores than TKA with valgus alignment (p = 0.015). The individual knee phenotype in patients with valgus osteoarthritis did not influence the outcome of mechanical aligned TKA operated with standardized soft-tissue release.

Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter

Background

Residual pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) refers to knee pain after 3 to 6 months postoperatively. The estimates of the proportion of patients who experience residual pain after TKA vary widely. We hypothesized that the variation may stem from the range of methods used to assess residual pain. We analyzed data from 2 prospective studies to assess the proportion of subjects with residual pain as defined by several commonly used metrics and to examine the association of residual pain defined by each metric with participant dissatisfaction.

Methods

We combined participant data from 2 prospective studies of TKA outcomes from subjects recruited between 2011 and 2014. Residual pain was defined using a range of metrics based on the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) pain score (0 to 100, in which 100 indicates worst), including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). We also examined combinations of MCID and PASS cutoffs. Subjects self-reported dissatisfaction following TKA, and we defined dissatisfied as somewhat or very dissatisfied at 12 months. We calculated the proportion of participants with residual pain, as defined by each metric, who reported dissatisfaction. We examined the association of each metric with dissatisfaction by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and Youden index.

Results

We analyzed data from 417 subjects with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 66.3 ± 8.3 years. Twenty-six participants (6.2%) were dissatisfied. The proportion of participants defined as having residual pain according to the various metrics ranged from 5.5% to >50%. The composite metric Improvement in WOMAC pain score ≥20 points or final WOMAC pain score ≤25 had the highest positive predictive value for identifying dissatisfied subjects (0.54 [95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.71]). No metric had a Youden index of ≥50%.

Conclusions

Different metrics provided a wide range of estimates of residual pain following TKA. No estimate was both sensitive and specific for dissatisfaction in patients who underwent TKA, underscoring that measures of residual pain should be defined explicitly in reports of TKA outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrument for Cylindrical Axis Implementation in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

In kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA), the cylindrical axis (CA) is very important in restoring the native joint line and kinematics of the pre-arthritic knee. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of patient-specific instrument (PSI) for restoring the CA for femoral bone resection in KA-TKA.

Methods

Thirty KA-TKAs were performed using a computed tomography (CT)-based PSI system. Data from preoperative CT were reconstructed into three-dimensional (3D) models using 3D-planning software. The CA was created by connecting the centers of each virtual sphere to the medial and lateral femoral condyles using computer software. Femoral bone resection of the distal and posterior condyles was performed parallel to the sagittal planes of the CA. The thickness of the CA-referenced bone resection was determined based on the thickness necessary for the respective regions of the femoral component. The PSI was manufactured to locate the guide pin for a conventional cutting block. The accuracy of PSI for KA-TKA was evaluated as the absolute error between the preoperatively predicted thickness and the intraoperative measurements in each of the four regions, as well as the difference in error between distal-medial (DM) and posterior-medial (PM) and between distal-lateral (DL) and posterior-lateral (PL).

Results

The differences in thickness of bone cut in the DM, DL, PM, and PL were 0.79 ± 0.39 mm (range, -1.20 to 1.50), 0.70 ± 0.42 mm (range, -1.50 to 1.50), 0.80 ± 0.46 mm (range, -0.80 to 1.50), and 0.75 ± 0.47 mm (range, -2.10 to 1.40), respectively. There was no significant difference in the thickness error between DM and PM (p = 0.959) and between DL and PL (p = 0.812).

Conclusions

In KA-TKA, PSI was effective for accurate femoral bone resection based on virtually planned thickness.

Navigated functional alignment total knee arthroplasty achieves reliable, reproducible and accurate results with high patient satisfaction

PURPOSE

The decision on which technique to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become more complicated over the last decade. Perceived limitations of mechanical alignment (MA) and kinematic alignment (KA) have led to the development of the functional alignment (FA) philosophy. This study aims to report the 2-year results of an initial patient cohort in terms of revision rate, PROMs and complications for Computer Aided Surgery (CAS) Navigated FA TKA.

METHODS

This paper reports a single surgeon's outcomes of 165 consecutive CAS FA TKAs. The final follow-up was 24 months. Pre-operative and post-operative patient-reported outcome measures, WOMAC and KSS, and intra-operative CAS data, including alignment, kinematic curves, and gaps, are reported. Stress kinematic curves were analysed for correlation with CAS final alignment and CAS final alignment with radiographic long-leg alignment. Pre- and post-operative CPAK and knee phenotypes were recorded. Three different types of prostheses from two manufacturers were used, and outcomes were compared. Soft tissue releases, revision and complication data are also reported.

RESULTS

Mean pre-operative WOMAC was 48.8 and 1.2 at the time of the final follow-up. KSS was 48.8 and 93.7, respectively. Pre- and post-operative range of motion was 118.6° and 120.1°, respectively. Pre-operative and final kinematic curve prediction had an accuracy of 91.8%. CAS data pre-operative stress alignment and final alignment strongly correlate in extension and flexion, r = 0.926 and 0.856, p < 0.001. No statistical outcome difference was detected between the types of prostheses. 14.5% of patients required soft tissue release, with the lateral release (50%) and posterior capsule (29%) being the most common.

CONCLUSION

CAS FA TKA in this cohort proved to be a predictable, reliable, and reproducible technique with acceptable short-term revision rates and high PROMs. FA can account for extremes in individual patient bony morphology and achieve desired gap and kinematic targets with soft tissue releases required in only 14.5% of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective case series review).

Improved Knee Function with Customized vs. Off-the-Shelf TKA Implants-Results of a Single-Surgeon, Single-Center, Single-Blinded Study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have been able to show certain benefits of Customized, Individually Made (CIM) compared to Off-the-Shelf (OTS) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), but evidence is still lacking regarding the benefits of these implant systems. This study aimed to find differences in scores and functional outcome by comparing CIM and OTS implants, using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and functional tests for activities of daily living in a single-surgeon setup.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients (16 CIM vs. 32 OTS) were consecutively enrolled and blindly examined. Functional testing was performed using four timed functional tests (TUG, WALK, TUDS, and BBS) and the VAS for pain. The Aggregated Locomotor Function (ALF) score was then calculated based on the addition of the average times of the three functional tests.

RESULTS

The CIM group showed significantly faster times in all functional tests and significantly better ALF scores. There were remarkable differences in the assessment of maximum pain sensation between the two groups, with superiority in the CIM group. The PROMs analysis revealed a higher proportion of excellent and good ratings for the items objective and function (KSS) in the CIM group.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that time-limited activities of daily living (ADLs) can be completed significantly faster with a CIM prosthesis and that a significantly higher percentage in this group reports freedom from pain during certain loads. Partial aspects of the PROM scores are also better in this group; however, this superiority could not be shown with regard to most PROM scores collected in this study.

Current Concepts in Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, emphasis has been placed on implant positioning and limb alignment. Traditionally, the aim for TKA has been to achieve a neutral mechanical alignment (MA) to maximize implant longevity. However, with the recent spike in interest in individualized alignment techniques and with the advent of new technologies, surgeons are slowly evolving away from classical MA.

METHODS

This review elucidates the differences in alignment techniques for TKA, describes the concept of knee phenotypes, summarizes comparative studies between MA and individualized alignment, and provides a simple way to incorporate the latter into surgeons' practice.

RESULTS

In order to manage patients by applying these strategies in day-to-day practice, a basic understanding of the aforementioned concepts is essential. Transition to an individualized alignment technique should be done gradually with caution in a stepwise approach.

CONCLUSION

Alignment and implant positioning are now at the heart of the debate and surgeons are investigating a more personalized approach to TKA.

Sub-optimal femoral fit in total knee arthroplasty, a systematic review of human femoral data vs off-the-shelf contemporary femoral components

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the inadequacy of fit between the human distal femur and the knee implants offerings and describe the available strategies to overcome this issue.

METHODS

A systematic research of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting morphologic measures of the distal femur. Studies were excluded if they included unhealthy knees or the morphological analysis did not report the two key dimensions to identify the patient's unique anatomy: AP length and mediolateral (ML) width. Clinically relevant component overhang or underhang was considered when the metal-bone mismatch was > 3 mm as described in the literature.

RESULTS

Six studies with anthropometric analysis of 1395 distal femurs met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that by employing the available sizes of four current "state-of-the-art" primary off-the shelf (OTS) femoral implants up to 13-41% would show underhang and 9-27% overhang clinically relevant and the introduction of narrower sizes did not reduce this percentage of underhang but improved the overhang rate of 10-15%.

CONCLUSIONS

Whenever an ML/AP mismatch in encountered in the operating room, adaptations are needed, and these bring about deleterious biomechanical and clinical complications. Therefore, this study highlights the need for implants design with multiple ML offerings per AP size, since they provide not only more sizes options but more femoral shapes to match the different ML sizes of the distal femur, compared to designs with single ML offerings for a given femoral AP dimension.

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty non-inferior to posterior-stabilized prostheses after 5 years: a randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) prostheses may improve satisfaction of patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether BCR prostheses provide better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilized (PS) prostheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a randomized single-blind control trial involving a total of 77 patients with knee osteoarthritis, randomly assigned to undergo TKA with a BCR or PS implant between 2015 and 2019. Mean follow-up period was 39 months. Clinical and demographic data were extracted manually from medical records. Data acquisition included patient demographics, knee range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes via KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 scores.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were randomized to the PS group and 39 to the BCR group. At the 5-year follow-up, no statistical differences were noted for knee range of motion or patient-reported outcomes between the two groups, except for a greater knee flexion in the early follow-up period in the PS group. Five adverse events occurred in the BCR group compared to none in the PS group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

BCR TKA yield similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes 5 years following the intervention compared with PS TKA. The BCR TKA had more complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I (Randomized Controlled Trial).

No difference in clinical outcomes between functionally aligned cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of subjects undergoing primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA), following functional alignment (FA) principles, with cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) bearing designs, at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective study included 167 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA with cemented PS and cementless CR implants performed with a CT-base robotic-arm assisted system (Mako, Stryker), following FA principles, between 2017 and 2020. Patients were followed up with a clinical and radiographic assessment and were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), and the 5-level Likert scale (5-LLS).

RESULTS

Three TKA revisions were performed (2 PS, 1 CR); therefore, a total of 164 knees with a mean age of 71.7 years (SD 8.9) were considered (80 cemented PS; 84 cementless CR). No statistically significant differences were recorded between study groups relative to FJS-12, KOOS-JR, and 5-LLS at a minimum of two year follow-up (FJS-12 89.3 ± 9.2 vs 87.5 ± 12.8, p-value 0.46; KOOS-JR 88.8 ± 10.0 vs 86.7 ± 14.0, p-value 0.31; 5-LLS 4.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.5 ± 0.8, p-value 0.34).

CONCLUSION

No significant outcome differences were reported between patients undergoing PS and CR RA-TKA at a minimum of two year follow-up. RA-TKA achieves excellent clinical results and high satisfaction scores, regardless of the implant design used.

Neutral Mechanical Alignment Alters the Native Distal Femoral Joint Line: A Virtual Three-Dimensional Planning Total Knee Arthroplasty Study

BACKGROUND

Alternative alignment concepts have garnered great interest in an effort to improve patient satisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to determine variation or deviation from an individual's native joint line in primary TKA using neutral mechanical versus a restricted kinematic technique.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study was performed evaluating the effect of neutral mechanical alignment (nMA) versus a restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) on the native joint line in 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA. Using preoperative computed tomography and intraoperative 3-dimensional software, 2 virtual preoperative plans were created: nMA and rKA. Templated bone resections were recorded. Change in joint line was calculated using known implant planar thickness and planned bone resection.

RESULTS

nMA yielded significantly greater deviation from the patient's native joint line along the lateral compartment of the knee (lateral distal femoral condyle, lateral posterior femoral condyle, lateral tibial resection). With nMA, the lateral distal femoral joint line was distalized by a mean 4.3 versus 2.6 mm using rKA technique (P < .001). In rKA, >60% of knees had <3 mm of deviation from the native lateral posterior femoral offset, whereas in nMA, >95% of knees had ≥3 mm change in the lateral posterior femoral condylar offset.

CONCLUSION

nMA-TKA resulted in statistically larger joint line deviations compared to rKA-TKA, most notably along the lateral distal femoral condyle joint line. Further analysis is needed to determine the clinical consequences of joint line deviation from the native anatomy using nMA as the target for primary TKA.

Cross-sectional Analysis Study Between SIGMA Knee System and ATTUNE in a Cruciate-Retaining Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Replacement, with no Patellar Resurfacing

Background

The purpose of our study was to compare the knee implant SIGMA to the ATTUNE knee implant in a cruciate-retaining (CR) fixed-bearing (FB) total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, with no patellar resurfacing.

Methods

We examined 40 patients (19 SIGMA; 21 ATTUNE) who underwent a TKR FB CR surgery, without patellar resurfacing, due to osteoarthritis, between August 2013 and July 2017. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. We performed a cross-sectional analytical study based on preoperative patient data and data collected in follow-up sessions. All patients were asked to fill a quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire, SF-36 translated to the Hebrew language. All patients were clinically evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Knee Function Score (KFS).

Results

Patients from the SIGMA cohort reported fewer postoperative physical function limitations in the SF-36 (p = 0.01) and the KFS (p = 0.04). Patients who underwent surgery using the SIGMA implant reported increased vitality when compared to the ATTUNE (p = 0.02). No significant differences were found between the groups in other measures of quality of life, ranges of motion, valgus, and postoperative knee stability. The average follow-up period was significantly longer for the SIGMA (p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Significant differences were found in postoperative physical function and vitality scores between SIGMA and ATTUNE knee implants. SIGMA cohort presented superior results. Presumably, these findings are due to the differences in follow-up times.

Are 20% of Patients Actually Dissatisfied Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is among the most performed orthopaedic surgeries in the United States with at least 1,000,000 cases performed per year. Dissatisfaction following TKA has often been reported as 20% or more, with a multitude of causes including sociodemographic, preoperative, and postoperative factors. The purpose of this study was to re-examine the rate and causes of dissatisfaction following TKA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed searching databases from 2010 to 2022. Only primary TKA cases were included and all cases of unicompartmental arthroplasty and revisions were excluded. After abstracts were reviewed, 35 articles were selected for a full-length review, which was ultimately reduced to 21 articles for final inclusion.

RESULTS

The average rate of patient dissatisfaction was 10%. Excluding complications, the average rate of dissatisfaction was 7.3%. The most common sociodemographic factors for dissatisfaction were age < 65 years, lower income, and non-White patients. Preoperative factors included lower Kellgren-Lawrence scores, depression/anxiety, and pain catastrophizing. Postoperatively, most dissatisfaction was due to complications, unmet expectations, persistent pain, and stiffness.

CONCLUSION

Based on our review, the average rate of patient dissatisfaction following TKA is 10%. Improved counseling for known risk factors may have reduced dissatisfaction rates by increasing preoperative patient optimization. Many studies in recent years have demonstrated the issue of poor patient coping skills, such as pain catastrophizing and anxiety/depression as a common cause of dissatisfaction. Ultimately, dissatisfaction following TKA still continues to affect a high portion of patients but less than historical reports of 20%.

Study on the correlation between early three-dimensional gait analysis and clinical efficacy after robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Robot-assisted technology is a forefront of surgical innovation that improves the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). But whether the accuracy of surgery can improve the clinical efficacy still needs further research. The purpose of this study is to perform three-dimensional (3D) analysis in the early postoperative period of patients who received robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA), and to study the trend of changes in gait parameters after RATKA and the correlation with the early clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Patients who received RATKA in the Center of Joint Surgery, the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military Medical University from October 2020 to January 2021 were included. The imaging parameters, i.e., hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, posterior condylar angle were measured 3 months post-TKA. The 3D gait analysis and clinical efficacy by Western Ontario Mac Master University Index (WOMAC) score were performed pre-TKA, 3 and 6 months post-TKA. The differences in spatiotemporal parameters of gait, kinetic parameters, and kinematic parameters of the operated limb and the contralateral limb were compared. The correlation between gait parameters and WOMAC scores was analyzed. Paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to analyze the difference between groups, and Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation.

RESULTS

There were 31 patients included in this study, and the imaging indexes showed that all of them returned to normal post-TKA. The WOMAC score at 3 months post-TKA was significantly lower than that pre-TKA, and there was no significant difference between at 3 and 6 months. The 3D gait analysis results showed that the double support time of the operated limb reduced at 3 and 6 months (all p < 0.05), the maximum extension and maximum external rotation of the knee joint increased at stance phase, and the maximum flexion angle, the range of motion and the maximum external rotation increased at swing phase. Compared with the preoperative data, there were significant improvements (all p < 0.05). Compared with the contralateral knee joint, the maximum external rotation of the knee joint at swing phase was smaller than that of the contralateral side, and the maximum flexion and extension moment was greater than that of the contralateral knee. The maximum external rotation moment of the joint was greater than that of the contralateral knee joint (p < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between the single support time pre-TKA and the WOMAC score at 3 months (p = 0.017), and the single support time at 3 months was negatively correlated with the WOMAC score at 6 months (p = 0.043). The cadence at 6 months was negatively correlated with the WOMAC score at 6 months (p = 0.031). The maximum knee extension at stance phase at 6 months was negatively correlated with the WOMAC score at 6 month (p = 0.048). The maximum external rotation at stance phase at 6 months was negatively correlated with the WOMAC score at 6 months (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

The 3D gait analysis of RATKA patients is more sensitive than WOMAC score in evaluating the clinical efficacy. Trend of changes in gait parameters shows that the knee joint support, flexion and extension function, range of motion, external rotation and varus deformity moment of the patient were significantly improved at 3 months after surgery, and continued to 6 months after surgery. Compared with the contralateral knee, the gait parameters of the operated limb still has significant gaps in functionality, such as the external rotation and flexion and extension. The single support time, cadence, knee extension, and knee external rotation of the operated limb have a greater correlation with the postoperative WOMAC score. Postoperative rehabilitation exercises should be emphasized, which is of great value for improving the early efficacy of RATKA.

The impact of different alignment strategies on bone cuts in total knee arthroplasty for varus knee phenotypes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to visualise the influence of alignment strategy on bone resection in varus knee phenotypes. The hypothesis was that different amounts of bone resection would be required depending on the alignment strategy chosen. Through visualisation of the corresponding bone sections, it was hypothesised, it would be possible to assess which of the different alignment strategies would require the least amount of change to the soft tissues for the chosen phenotype, whilst still ensuring acceptable alignment of the components, and thus could be considered the most ideal alignment strategy.

METHODS

Simulations of the different alignment strategies (mechanical, anatomical, constrained kinematic and unconstrained kinematic) in relation to their bone resections were performed on five common exemplary varus knee phenotypes. VAR_HKA174° VAR_FMA87° VAR_TMA84°, VAR_HKA174° VAR_FMA90° NEU_TMA87°, VAR_HKA174° NEU_FMA93° VAR_TMA84°, VAR_HKA177° NEU_FMA93° NEU_TMA87° and VAR_HKA177° VAL_FMA96° VAR_TMA81°. The phenotype system used categorises knees based on overall limb alignment (i.e. hip knee angle) but also takes into account joint line obliquity (i.e. TKA and FMA) and has been applied in the global orthopaedic community since its introduction in 2019. The simulations are based on long-leg radiographs under load. It is assumed that a change of 1° in the alignment of the joint line corresponds to a displacement of the distal condyle by 1 mm.

RESULTS

In the most common phenotype VAR_HKA174° NEU_FMA93° VAR_TMA84°, a mechanical alignment would result in an asymmetric elevation of the tibial medial joint line by 6 mm and a lateral distalisation of the femoral condyle by 3 mm, an anatomical alignment only by 0 and 3 mm, a restricted by 3 and 3 mm, respectively, whilst a kinematic alignment would result in no change in joint line obliquity. In the similarly common phenotype 2 VAR_HKA174° VAR_FMA90° NEU_TMA87° with the same HKA, the changes are considerably less with only 3 mm asymmetric height change on one joint side, respectively, and no change in restricted or kinematic alignment.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that significantly different amounts of bone resection are required depending on the varus phenotype and the alignment strategy chosen. Based on the simulations performed, it can, therefore, be assumed that an individual decision for the respective phenotype is more important than the dogmatically correct alignment strategy. By including such simulations, the modern orthopaedic surgeon can now avoid biomechanically inferior alignments and still obtain the most natural possible knee alignment for the patient.