Arthroscopic assistance does not improve the functional or radiographic outcome of unstable intra-articular distal radial fractures treated with a volar locking plate

Are Clinical Practice Guidelines Representative of Patients With Distal Radius Fractures? A Review of Patient Demographics and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used to Inform Guidelines

PURPOSE

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are recommendations developed for broad application to optimize high-quality care and decision-making. The composition of patients and outcome measures used in studies informing CPGs; however, has not been rigorously evaluated. With growing evidence that outcomes in musculoskeletal surgery vary by sociocultural factors, we aimed to: (1) review the linguistic, racial, and ethnic representation of the patients in the studies informing CPGs for distal radius fractures and (2) assess their use of linguistically and culturally adapted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons website was used to identify relevant studies. Key variables were extracted, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, language of study, patient language and proficiency, patient race and ethnicity, and use of translated or culturally adapted PROMs. If provided, the clinical trial registration page for the study was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the frequency of each variable.

RESULTS

Fifty-four published texts were evaluated. Participant language was reported in four (7%) of the published texts and six (11%) when including the clinical trial registration information. Of the published texts, one (2%) reported ethnic group/race data and 40 (74%) used PROMs. Of those using PROMs, eight (20%) of 40 reported the use of translated PROMs, and three (8%) of 40 reported the use of culturally adapted PROMs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of reporting of linguistic, racial, and ethnic data and inconsistent use of PROMs, particularly those that are translated and culturally adapted, in studies included in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons CPG for distal radius fractures. As sociocultural characteristics and PROMs are associated with outcomes, ensuring they are broadly represented in studies, may improve equity and shared decision-making.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Greater inclusion and reporting of demographic data and PROMs are required in musculoskeletal studies to ensure broad applicability and advance health equity.

Adjuvant Arthroscopy Does Not Improve the Functional Outcome of Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of adding arthroscopy to osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures (DRF) with volar locking plate (VLP), by Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) 1 year after surgery.

METHODS

In total, 186 functionally independent adult patients who met the inclusion criteria (DRF and a clinical decision for surgery with a VLP) were randomized to arthroscopic assistance or not. Primary outcome was PRWE questionnaire results 1 year after surgery. For the main variable, PRWE, we obtained the minimal clinically important difference based on a distribution-based method. Secondary outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaires, range of motion, strength, radiographic measures, and presence of joint step-offs by computed tomography. Data were collected preoperatively and at +1 and +4 weeks, +3 and +6 months, and +1 year after surgery. Complications were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

In total, 180 patients (mean age: 59.0 ± 14.9 years; 76% women) were analyzed by modified intention to treat. A total of 82% of the fractures were intra-articular (AO type C). No significant difference between arthroscopic (AG) and control (CG) groups in median PRWE was found at +1 year (median AG: 5.0, median CG: 7.5, difference in medians 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0, 7.0, P = .328). The proportion of patients who exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 12.81 points in the AG and CG was 86.4% vs 85.1%, P = .819, respectively. Percentage of associated injuries and step-offs reduction maneuvers was greater with arthroscopy (mean differences: 17.1 95% CI -0.1, 26.1, P < .001) and 17.4 (95% CI 5.0, 29.7, P = .007). The difference in percentage of residual joint step-offs at the postsurgical computed tomography in radioulnar, radioscaphoid, and radiolunate joints was not significant (P = .990, P = .538, and P = .063). Complications were similar between groups (16.9% vs 20.9%, P = .842).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant arthroscopy did not significantly improve PRWE score +1 year after surgery for DRF with VLP, although the statistical power of the study is below the initially estimated to detect the expected difference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Arthroscopic Assistance in Surgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background  Wrist arthroscopy has become a commonly used tool for the management of adults with distal radius fractures (DRFs), although its implementation requires technical competence. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised the available evidence concerning the contribution of wrist arthroscopy to the functional and radiological outcomes of patients with DRFs operated with arthroscopic assistance. Methods  Randomized control trials were identified through five principal electronic databases on May 31, 2022: Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, Embase, and PubMed. Two authors independently performed the search and data extraction and assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB tool. Results  A total of 1,780 relevant abstracts and citations were extracted in the preliminary search, which yielded 6 trials that met the eligibility criteria, and 3 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The overall pooled mean difference (MD) estimate showed no significant difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores between surgical groups with and without arthroscopic assistance (MD = 0.77 points, 95% confidence interval = -6.58 to 5.03, p  = 0.79), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2  = 85%). Conclusion  There was low-quality evidence that wrist arthroscopy conveyed not clinically or statistically significant difference to functional outcomes of patients with DRFs. However, our findings are limited by the numbers of studies included and lack of long-term follow-up, although they do provide a good starting point for future quality research.

Editorial Commentary: Supplemental Wrist Arthroscopy May Not Be the Key to Improving Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

For decades, the surgical treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures has relied on indirect reduction. The goal is to mitigate the articular stepoff that has been associated with radiographic progression of arthritic changes. Continued advances in wrist arthroscopy give us the opportunity for direct visualization of these reductions, direct assessment of intra-articular screws, and diagnosis and treatment of concomitant soft tissue pathology, including those to the scapholunate interosseous ligament, lunotriquetral interosseous ligament, and the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Despite this, however, supplemental wrist arthroscopy does not appear to improve outcomes at 1 year in patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plates.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Fracture Treatment in the Wrist

Wrist arthroscopy in the setting of wrist fracture affords direct visualization of reduction and identification of associated cartilage and soft tissue injuries. Further, mitigating soft tissue insult in the setting of perilunate injuries may decrease postoperative pain and stiffness while attaining outcomes equivalent to open techniques in appropriately selected patients. Technical proficiency of the surgeon continues to be a limitation of the technique. Randomized controlled studies are needed to better understand outcomes.

Minimal invasions: is wrist arthroscopy supported by evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Wrist arthroscopy is used increasingly, but its benefits and harms are unclear. This systematic review aimed to identify all published randomized controlled trials on wrist arthroscopy and synthesize the evidence of the benefits and harms of wrist arthroscopic procedures.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for randomized controlled trials comparing wrist-arthroscopic surgery with corresponding open surgery, placebo surgery, a non-surgical treatment, or no treatment. We estimated the treatment effect with a random effect meta-analysis using patient reported outcome measure (PROM) as primary outcome where several studies assessed the same intervention.

RESULTS

Of 7 included studies, none compared wrist arthroscopic procedures with no treatment or placebo surgery. 3 trials compared arthroscopically assisted reduction with fluoroscopic reduction of intra-articular distal radius fractures. The certainty of evidence was low to very low for all comparisons. The benefit of arthroscopy was clinically unimportant (smaller than what patients may consider meaningful) at all time points. 2 studies compared arthroscopic and open resection of wrist ganglia, finding no significant difference in recurrence rates. 1 study estimated the benefit of arthroscopic joint debridement and irrigation in intra-articular distal radius fractures, showing no clinically relevant benefit. 1 study compared arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair with splinting in distal radioulnar joint instability in people with distal radius fractures, finding no evidence of benefits for repair at the long-term follow-up but the study was unblinded, and the estimates imprecise.

CONCLUSION

The current limited evidence from RCTs does not support benefits of wrist arthroscopy compared with open or non-surgical interventions.

Are Radiographic Characteristics Associated With Outcome in Surgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures?

PURPOSE

Evidence to date shows that distal radius fracture displacement measured on radiographs does not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. Quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) (Q3DCT) potentially captures fracture displacement more accurately. We aimed to assess the independent association between radiographic, CT, and Q3DCT measures of residual displacement and change in disability, quality of life, range of motion (ROM), and grip strength 12 weeks and 1 year after volar plating of intra-articular distal radius fractures.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from a prospective multicenter trial. Seventy-one patients underwent volar plating of their AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type B or C distal radius fracture and were available at 12 weeks; 67 (94%) were available at 1 year. We recorded demographics, postoperative periapical radiographs (radial height, ulnarward inclination, ulnar variance, gap, and step off), lateral radiographs (palmar tilt, scapholunate angle, teardrop angle, and anteroposterior distance), postoperative CT scans (gap [coronal, sagittal and axial]) and step off [sagittal and coronal]), and in 3-dimensional models (number of articular fragments, mean fragment articular surface area, 3-dimensional fragment displacement, and gap surface area). Radiographs and CT scans were obtained within 10 working days after fracture fixation. Outcome measures were change in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores, EuroQol Group 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ5D) results, grip strength, and composite wrist ROM at 12 weeks and 1 year compared to preinjury level.

RESULTS

At 1 year, greater recovery in PRWE scores was independently associated with older age. Greater recovery in composite ROM at 1 year was associated with injury to the dominant side and less step-off on posteroanterior radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Less posteroanterior step-off was associated with a small improvement in composite wrist ROM at 1 year. This should be considered when counseling patients on the risks and benefits of surgical treatment when radiographic and CT measures of displacement fall within the range found in this study, and in older, low-demand patients.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Practical Application of the 2020 Distal Radius Fracture AAOS/ASSH Clinical Practice Guideline: A Clinical Case

The Clinical Practice Guideline Management of Distal Radius Fractures released by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Society for Surgery of the Hand is a summary of the available evidence designed to guide surgeons and other qualified physicians in the management of distal radius fractures. According to this guideline, age of 65 is used as a proxy for functional activity and can serve as a threshold under which patients are likely to benefit from surgical fixation and over which patients are less likely to benefit from surgical fixation when compared with nonsurgical treatment. Supervised therapy and arthroscopic assistance should be used sparingly and on a case-by-case basis. Routine radiographs should also be used on a case-by-case basis. As strong evidence suggests no difference observed in clinical or radiographic outcomes by fixation technique used after 3 months, fixation technique should be driven by fracture pattern. These guidelines serve to guide physicians in the care of patients with distal radius fractures.

Arthroscopic debridement of the dorsal capsule in intraarticular distal radius fractures: does it provide superior outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are very common. One of the most significant complications after intraarticular DRF is arthrofibrosis with loss of wrist motion and pain. Wrist arthroscopy has become increasingly popular in the treatment of DRF with the advantage of good visualization of the joint surface and soft tissue injuries. In intraarticular DRFs injuries of the dorsal capsule are a characteristic finding which potentially cause loss of wrist motion. In this study, we investigated if arthroscopic debridement of dorsal capsule injuries at time of surgical fixation provides superior outcomes compared to the same treatment without debridement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, we included 42 patients who underwent arthroscopy-assisted palmar plating for intraarticular DRFs in a prospective randomized controlled study. In group A (intervention group), the dorsal capsule tears were debrided during primary surgery, while in group B these were left in place. Active range of motion (AROM), grip strength, subjective outcomes and radiographic results were assessed 3, 6 and 12 months after primary surgery. A subgroup analysis was performed for patient age, fracture severity and duration of immobilization.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic debridement of the dorsal capsule improved AROM in patients over 60 years of age, more severe fractures (AO 23 C2/C3) and prolonged postoperative immobilization for more than two weeks, while it was not relevant for younger patients with simple fractures and short immobilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Debridement of the injured dorsal capsule in arthroscopic-assisted surgical treatment of intraarticular DRFs can improve surgical performance and optimize patient outcomes in a specific subgroup of patients.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic-Assisted Distal Radius Fracture Volar Plating: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The use of wrist arthroscopy to assist fixation of distal radius fractures with volar locking plates (VLPs) has been gaining popularity in recent years; however, there is no consensus on its benefits. This meta-analysis compares outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted VLP to fluoroscopic-assisted VLP in distal radius fractures through a systematic review of the published literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of publications from databases (Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane) was obtained from inception to May 2020. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate effect sizes. Outcomes included postoperative radiographic reduction (gap, stepoff, radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance), procedural outcomes (operative time, additional soft tissue injuries and complications), and functional outcomes (range of motion; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score; Mayo clinic score; and grip strength).

RESULTS

Six studies, involving 280 patients, met the final inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis for postoperative stepoff was statistically significant, favoring arthroscopic-assisted VLP. In addition, there was greater identification of associated soft tissue injuries, increased wrist extension, and a longer operative duration when performing arthroscopic-assisted VLP fixation. There were no differences in other postoperative radiographic outcomes, complications, or functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature suggests that arthroscopic-assisted VLP is a useful adjunct to intra-articular reduction and treatment of associated soft tissue injuries in distal radius fractures. Considerations should include operative time, costs, and the additional training required. Further studies are needed to assess functional outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/American Society for Surgery of the Hand Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Management of Distal Radius Fractures

The Management of Distal Radius Fractures Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies for the treatment of distal radius fractures in adults older than 18 years. The scope of this guideline is limited to the treatment of acute distal radius fractures and does not address distal radius malunion. This guideline contains seven recommendations to assist orthopaedic surgeons and all qualified physicians managing patients with acute distal radius fractures based on the best current available evidence. It serves as an information resource for professional healthcare practitioners and developers of practice guidelines and recommendations. In addition to providing pragmatic practice recommendations, this guideline also highlights gaps in the literature and informs areas for future research and quality measure development.

Adult Distal Radius Fracture Management

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are some of the most commonly encountered fractures, and the incidence is increasing. Optimal treatment remains controversial. Critical evaluation of the initial imaging is necessary to recognize fracture characteristics and stability. The fracture pattern, injury mechanism, soft-tissue injury, patient characteristics, and surgeon preference are generally taken into consideration when choosing the most appropriate modality. Volar plating has become the workhorse of surgical DRF management but is not without complications. The surgeon should be comfortable using a wide variety of techniques to customize the fixation to the fracture pattern. Recognition of potential dangers and use of intraoperative imaging techniques can mitigate complications. Goals of rehabilitation after the initial treatment of DRF include regaining motion, strength, and ultimately function while managing pain.

Distal Radius Fracture Clinical Practice Guidelines-Updates and Clinical Implications

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Society for Surgery of the Hand released updated Clinical Practice Guidelines in 2020 on the evaluation and treatment of acute distal radius fractures. Following a rigorous methodology designed and implemented through the AAOS, 7 guidelines based upon the best available evidence were released to assist surgeons and physicians managing distal radius fractures. These guidelines can serve as a reference for surgeons when managing patients with distal radius fractures. We review the evidence behind each guideline and highlight the practical implications of each guideline on care.

A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Variable-Angle and Fixed-Angle Volar Locking Plating for Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of using a variable-angle volar locking plate (VAVLP) with those of using a fixed-angle volar locking plate (FAVLP) for treating unstable intra-articular fractures of the distal radius.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients with unstable intra-articular fractures of the distal radius were randomized to open reduction and internal fixation with a VAVLP (n = 60) or an FAVLP (n = 60). Supplementary methods (eg., Kirschner wire fixation) were required in 4 patients with a VAVLP and 9 with an FAVLP. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were used to measure standard radiographic parameters before surgery, in the immediate postoperative period, and at 1 year. Plate prominence and articular congruity were quantified using computed tomography at 6 months.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in any clinical outcome between the groups at any follow-up time. Volar tilt was significantly greater in patients treated with a FAVLP in the immediate postoperative period (8° vs 6°) and at 1 year (8° vs 5°). Although significant differences were not found in articular gap or stepoff between the 2 plates, the distal and volar prominence of the VAVLP was significantly greater than that of the FAVLP at 6 months. Significantly more patients treated with a VAVLP had a complication (38% vs 19%). However, most secondary surgeries were performed for hardware removal, and no patients from either group had complex regional pain syndrome or tendon rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures can expect good functional and radiographic outcomes with VAVLP or FAVLP fixation. The VAVLP may be more prone to technical errors, leading to complications, whereas the FAVLP is more likely to require supplementary fixation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic I.

Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of orthopedic trauma literature: A cross-sectional review

OBJECTIVES

A cross-sectional analysis of orthopedic trauma randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts to assess the frequency and manifestations of spin, the misrepresentation or distortion of research findings, in orthopedic trauma clinical trials.

METHODS

The top 5 orthopedic trauma journals were searched from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. RCTs with nonsignificant endpoints (p > .05) were analyzed for spin in the abstract. The primary endpoint of our investigation was the frequency and type of spin. The secondary endpoint was to assess whether funding source was associated with the presence of spin. Due to the low reporting of funding sources no statistics were able to be computed for this outcome.

RESULTS

Our PubMed search yielded 517 articles. Primary screening excluded 303 articles, and full text evaluation excluded an additional 161. Overall, 53 articles were included. Spin was identified in 35 of the 53 (66.0%) abstracts analyzed. Evidence of spin was found in 21 (39.6%) abstract results sections and 22 (41.5%) abstract conclusion sections. Of the 21 RCTs reporting a clinical trial registry, 3 (14.3%) had evidence of selective reporting bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopedic trauma RCTs from highly ranked journals with nonsignificant endpoints published from 2012 to 2017 frequently have spin in their abstracts. Abstracts with evidence of spin may influence a reader's perception of new drugs or procedures. In orthopedic trauma, the implications of spin may affect the treatment of patients with orthopedic trauma, so efforts to mitigate spin in RCT abstracts must be prioritized.

Arthroscopy in Distal Radius Fractures: Indications and When to Do It

Wrist arthroscopy in the setting of distal radius fractures allows for direct visualization of the articular surface and treatment of associated soft tissue injuries. Arthroscopic techniques may be used to fine tune reductions with residual articular step-off or gap after an initial reduction attempt and are critical for addressing free articular fragments and die-punch lesions. Surgeon training, experience, and comfort with wrist arthroscopy remains a barrier to widespread adoption of this technique. Level I studies are needed to investigate whether improved articular reduction leads to meaningful clinical differences.

Comparing Outcomes between Arthroscopic-Assisted Reduction and Fluoroscopic Reduction in AO Type C Distal Radius Fracture Treatment

Background  Distal radius fracture is one of the most common injuries. Poor functional result with restricted wrist motion can be developed when there is intra-articular fibrous tissue development arising from articular step-off and gapping. Objectives  The aim of this study is to compare the functional and radiological outcome between arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fluoroscopic reduction in treating unstable intra-articular distal radius fracture. Methods  We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients with intraarticular AO type C distal radius fracture treated with arthroscopic-assisted fracture reduction and internal fixation and compared them with another group of 12 patients in which fracture reduction is assessed by fluoroscopy alone (15 males and 9 females, mean age 57.3, range 27-73). The two cohorts were analyzed for differences in radiological parameters including articular stepping and gapping, palmar tilt, radial inclination, ulnar variance as well as functional outcome in range of motion, grip strength, modified mayo wrist score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at an average of 12.5 months (range 5-26) after surgery. Results  Arthroscopic-assisted fracture reduction group has statistically better restoration of articular stepping and gapping, volar tilt and ulnar variance. Range of motion, grip strength, modified mayo wrist score and Quick DASH score also had statistically significant improvement in arthroscopic group. Conclusion  Our study showed arthroscopic-assisted technique can precisely restore radiological parameters in highly comminuted distal radius fracture with good functional outcome. Also, associated intra-articular soft tissue injury can be detected and treated simultaneously. Level of Evidence  This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.

Management of Comminuted Distal Radius Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review

Distal radius fractures occur in a bimodal age and sex distribution. Their incidence continues to rise with an increasingly active aging population. The current American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines for operative intervention are radial shortening of >3 mm, dorsal tilt of >10[degrees], or intra-articular displacement or step-off of >2 mm. The method of reduction and fixation should be selected on a case-by-case basis with a focus on patient factors, fracture behavior, surgical proficiency, and functional outcomes.

Arthroscopic treatment of chronic wrist pain after distal radius fractures

We report the arthroscopic and clinical findings of patients with chronic wrist pain following distal radius fracture (DRF) who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment.We retrospectively analyzed the records of 15 patients with chronic wrist pain following DRF, who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment from 2010 to 2017. The average patient age was 44 years (range, 20-68 years), average time from injury to treatment 21 ± 23.46 months (range, 3-96 months) and average follow up period 20.13 ± 8.71 months (range, 12-39 months). The functional outcome was evaluated by comparing the preoperative and final follow up values of the range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, visual analogue scale for pain and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score.Based on the arthroscopic findings, synovitis was found in all cases and the pathologic intra-articular lesions were classified into 4 patterns. Triangular fibrocartilage complex rupture was seen in 14 cases, intercarpal and radiocarpal ligament ruptures in 9 cases, ulnar impaction syndrome in 5 cases, and cartilage lesion in 9 cases. In terms of surgical treatment, 15 patients underwent arthroscopic synovectomy, 7 foveal or capsular repair of TFCC, 7 intercarpal Kirschner wires fixation or intercarpal thermal shrinkage, 1 intercarpal ligament reconstruction, 2 Sauve-Kapandji procedure, and 2 unlar shortening osteotomy. Postoperatively, the average range of motion, grip strength, and pinch strength increased significantly. From preoperative to final follow up values, the average visual analogue scale and quick disabilities of the arm score decreased from 5.93 ± 1.58 (range, 3-8) to 1.33 ± 1.29 (range, 0-3) (P = .001) and from 49.38 ± 19.09 to 12.63 ± 7.63 (P = .001), respectively.Diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment of chronic wrist pain following DRF can provide an accurate diagnosis, significant pain relief, and functional improvement.

Arthroscopic debridement does not enhance surgical treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial

The aim of this study was to determine the difference in functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with and without arthroscopic debridement in adults with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. In this multicentre trial, 50 patients were randomized between ORIF with or without arthroscopic debridement. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Secondary outcome measures were Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, pain scores, range of wrist motion, grip strength, and complications. Median PRWE was worse for the intervention group at 3 months and was equal for both groups at 12 months. The secondary outcome measures did not show consistent patterns of differences at different time-points of follow-up. We conclude that patients treated with additional arthroscopy to remove intra-articular hematoma and debris did not have better outcomes than those treated with ORIF alone. We therefore do not recommend arthroscopy for removal of hematoma and debris when surgically fixing distal radius fractures. Level of evidence: I.

Radiographic Change in Articular Reduction After Volar Locking Plating for Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures

PURPOSE

To examine the stability of the articular reduction 12 weeks after intra-articular distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation with a volar locking plate (VLP).

METHODS

We prospectively assessed for losses in articular reduction, including gap and step, during the 12 weeks following surgery for intra-articular DRF treated with a VLP in 68 wrists. The mean patient age was 62 years (range, 16-88 years). Frontal and lateral digital tomosynthesis, a recently developed form of digital tomography, was employed to measure articular gap and step in the lunate and scaphoid fossa of the radius. The average time between surgery and imaging was 1.2 days (range, 0-2 days) for the first evaluation and 87.0 days (range, 74-105 days) for the second examination.

RESULTS

The mean gap and step were similar at the first and second examinations: 0.4 mm (SD, 0.8) and 0.3 mm (SD, 0.6) and 0.3 mm (SD, 0.7) and 0.3 mm (SD, 0.5), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no change in the alignment of the fragments in cases treated with VLP.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Arthroscopic assisted treatment of distal radius fractures and concomitant injuries

Wrist arthroscopy is mainly used to assist fracture reduction and fixation and to diagnose and treat concomitant injuries mainly to the scapholunate (SL), lunotriquetral (LT) ligament and the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). Arthroscopy is beneficial in improving anatomical reduction of fracture steps and gaps in intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). Yet, the literature that the functional outcome correlates with the use of arthroscopy, is limited. Non-surgical treatment and immobilization is recommended for Geissler grade I-III Sl-ligament injuries, while open reduction, ligament suture and/or K-wire pinning is mandatory for complete ligament tears according to Geissler grade IV. This manuscript describes the current literature and gives insight into the authors' opinions and practice.

Contribution of arthroscopy to the management of intra-articular distal radius fractures: Knowledge update based on a systematic 10-year literature review

The objective of this study was to review current data on the contribution of wrist arthroscopy to the management of intra-articular distal radius fractures (IADRFs). The literature published over the last 10 years was reviewed by searching databases with the key indexing terms 'distal radius fracture', 'articular', and 'wrist arthroscopy'. The information in the 21 articles thus retrieved was used to answer the following questions: (i) Can arthroscopy improve the reduction of IADRFs? (ii) How does arthroscopy contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of concomitant ligament injuries? and (iii) Does arthroscopy help to improve the functional scores? The contribution of arthroscopy to IADRF reduction remains controversial. Follow-ups were limited (15 months on average) and some of the studies provided only level IV evidence. The data do not consistently suggest that arthroscopically assisted surgery may improve the quality of reduction. In contrast, they highlight the usefulness of arthroscopy in allowing the same-stage management of carpal ligament injuries. In the 12 studies providing data on this point, scapholunate inter-osseous ligament injuries were present in 41% of cases; one-fourth of these injuries were full-thickness tears that were successfully repaired by arthroscopy. The triangular fibrocartilage complex was injured in 48% of cases, and 30% of these injuries were peripheral ulnar detachments that were successfully repaired by arthroscopy. At present, arthroscopy does not allow the repair of all diagnosed ligament injuries. Comparative studies with longer follow-ups will shed light on the ability of arthroscopy to improve functional scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The clinical result of arterialized venous free flaps for the treatment of soft tissue defect of the fingers

The purpose of this study is to report the clinical results of the arterialized venous free flaps in reconstructing soft tissue defects of the finger and to extend the indications for the use of the flaps based on clinical experiences of the authors.We retrospectively reviewed the records of 35 patients who underwent an arterialized venous free flaps for a finger reconstruction, between May 2007 and August 2015. The mean size of flap was 4.8 ± 1.23 × 3.1 ± 0.84 cm. The donor site was the ipsilateral volar aspect of the distal forearm in all cases. There were 17 (48.6%) cases of venous skin flaps, 9 (25.7%) cases of innervated venous flaps, 7 (20%) cases of tendocu taneous flaps, and 2 (5.7%) case of innervated tendocutaneous flap. The vascularity of recipient beds was good except 8 (22.9%) cases (partial devascularity in 3, more than 50% avascularity [bone cement] in 3, and chronic infected bed in 2).Of the 35 cases, 29 (82.9%) cases (including 3 cases who had more than 50% avascularity recipient bed) showed complete survival. 3 (8.6%) cases, which had partially devascularity of distal phalanx in recipient bed, showed partial necrosis (P = .015). The mean number of included veins was 2.4 ± 0.5 for a flap.A forearm arterialized venous free flap is a useful procedure for single-stage reconstructing of a soft tissue or combined defect of a finger, we consider that this technique could be applied to fingers despite an avascular or insufficient vascular recipient bed if the periphery of recipient bed vascularity was good and if the recipient beds were free from infection.

[Preliminary effectiveness of carpal arthroscopic adjuvant treatment of intra-articular fractures of distal radius]

Objective

To investigate the early-term effectiveness of carpal arthroscopy in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of distal radius.

Methods

The clinical data of 50 cases of intra-articular fractures of distal radius between January 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of intraoperative assisted treatment, the patients were divided into the trial group (11 cases with carpal arthroscopy assisted treatment) and the control group (39 cases with traditional open reduction). There was no significant difference between the two groups in general data such as gender, age, affected side, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, and preoperative displacement ( P>0.05), which were comparable. Six patients in the trial group had triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury and received one-stage repair. Postoperative X-ray films were taken to estimate the fracture reduction. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) wrist function score and modified Mayo score were used at 3 months after operation to evaluate the function of the wrist. The range of wrist flexion, extension, pronation, and supination motion of the two groups were recorded and compared at 3 months after operation. Patients in the trial group were further divided into the reduction group after arthroscopic exploration (group A, 6 cases) and the simple cleaning group after arthroscopic exploration (group B, 5 cases), and their wrist motions were compared.

Results

The operation time of the trial group was greater than that of the control group ( t=11.08, P=0.00). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and fracture reduction between the two group ( P>0.05). X-ray film at 1 day after operation showed that the degree of fracture displacement was significantly decreased when compared with preoperative one in each group ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between the two groups at 1 day after operation ( t=0.19, P=0.85). Patients in both groups were followed up 8-20 months, with an average of 12 months. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( t=0.52, P=0.60). At 3 months after operation, the PRWE score, modified Mayo score, and wrist motions in the trial group were all better than those in the control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in wrist motions between group A and group B ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

Carpal arthroscope assisted treatment of intra-articular fractures of distal radius can achieve good reduction and postoperative function. Meanwhile, TFCC, ligament, articular cartilage, and other injuries can be repaired in one stage.

APPLICABILITY OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN HAND SURGERY: SURVEY STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To assess the applicability of randomized clinical trials and whether certain factors (surgeon experience/journal impact factor) influence their applicability.

METHODS

In this survey study we used the Pubmed/Medline database to select 32 consecutive randomized clinical trials published between 2013 and 2015, involving hand surgery (high/low impact). These studies were independently assessed by 20 hand surgeons (with more or less than 10 years of practice) who answered 4 questions regarding their applicability. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa and comparison of proportions via chi-square statistics. P-value <5% constituted statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 640 evaluations were produced, generating 2560 responses. A weak correlation was observed between less and more experienced respondents (kappa <0.2; range 0.119-0.179). Applicability between the least and most experienced respondents was similar (p = 0.424 and p = 0.70). Stratification by journal impact factor showed no greater propensity of applicability (p = 0.29) for any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low agreement was found between the respondents for the applicability of the randomized studies. Surgeon experience and journal impact do not seem to influence this decision. Level of Evidence II, Prospective comparative study.

Operative Treatment of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures With versus Without Arthroscopy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

In the past several years, an increase in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for intra-articular distal radius fractures has been observed. This technique leads to a quicker recovery of function compared to non-operative treatment. However, some patients continue to have a painful and stiff wrist postoperatively. Arthroscopically assisted removal of intra-articular fracture haematoma and debris may improve the functional outcomes following operative treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures. The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to determine the difference in functional outcome, assessed with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, after ORIF with and without an additional wrist arthroscopy in adult patients with displaced complete articular distal radius fractures.

Methods

In this multicentre trial, adult patients with a displaced complete articular distal radius fracture are randomised between ORIF with an additional wrist arthroscopy to remove fracture haematoma and debris (intervention group) and conventional fluoroscopic-assisted ORIF (control group). The primary outcome is functional outcome assessed with the PRWE score after three months. Secondary outcomes are wrist function assessed with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, postoperative pain, range of motion, grip strength, complications and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, in the intervention group, the quality of reduction, associated ligamentous injuries and cartilage damage will be assessed. A total of 50 patients will be included in this study.

Discussion

Although ORIF of intra-articular distal radius fractures leads to a quicker resume of function compared to non-operative treatment, some patients continue to have a painful and stiff wrist postoperatively. We hypothesise that, due to the removal of fracture haematoma and debris by an additional arthroscopy, functional outcomes will be better compared to the non-arthroscopically treated group.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02660515. Registered on 13 January 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2409-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Treatment of intra-articular fracture of distal radius fractures with fluoroscopic only or combined with arthroscopic control: A prospective tomodensitometric comparative study of 40 patients

BACKGROUND

Considering articular distal radius fractures treated with volar plate, we hypothesized that articular radio-carpal displacement was better reduced with arthroscopic control than with only fluoroscopic control.

METHODS

Forty patients with similar articular radius fracture (type C according to AO classification) and high functional needs were treated with volar plate fixation. They were divided in two comparative groups: 20 patients in Fluoroscopic group and 20 patients in Arthroscopic group. Pre and postoperative radiographs and tomodensitometric images were analysed by an independent observer. We evaluate extra and intra-articular displacements according to "Patient Accident Fracture" classification.

RESULTS

We observed a better reduction of the radio-carpal step-off and gap in the arthroscopic group, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). The index of postoperative intra-articular reduction was better in the fluoroscopic group (5.5) than in the arthroscopic group (2.2) with a significant difference (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

According to these results, arthroscopy is useful to perform a better articular radio-carpal reduction in distal radius fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Longitudinal recovery following distal radial fractures managed with volar plate fixation

AIMS

To synthesise the literature and perform a meta-analysis detailing the longitudinal recovery in the first two years following a distal radius fracture (DRF) managed with volar plate fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Following eligibility screening and quality assessment, data were extracted and outcomes were assimilated at the post-operative time points of interest. A state-of-the-art longitudinal mixed-effects meta-analysis model was employed to analyse the data.

RESULTS

The search identified 5698 articles, of which 46 study reports met the selection criteria. High levels of disability and impairment were reported in the immediate post-operative period with subsequently a rapid initial improvement followed by more gradual improvement for up to one year. The results highlight that the period associated with the greatest physical recovery is in the first three months and suggest that the endpoint of treatment outcomes is best measured at one year post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

Clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes can be expected for 12 months, after which progress plateaus and reaches normal values. This paper adopted a novel approach to meta-analyses in that the research question was of a longitudinal nature, which required a unique method of statistical analysis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1665-76.

Treatment of Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures

This review of current literature discusses the morphology of the volar aspect of the distal radius; the surgical procedure, arthroscopic findings, and clinical results of a plate presetting and arthroscopic reduction technique for acute intra-articular fractures; and a novel simulation guidance system for malunited intra-articular fractures. Classification of intra-articular distal radius fractures is also discussed, focusing on central depression fracture fragments, associated soft tissue injuries, and results for measuring scapholunate distances at different sites. Problems of the distal radioulnar joint are reviewed, in particular, functional outcomes of the authors' prospective cohort study on unstable intra-articular fractures involving the distal radioulnar joint.

Distal Radius Fractures: Approaches, Indications, and Techniques

Distal radius fractures remain among the most common fractures of the upper extremity. The indications for operative management continue to evolve based on outcomes from the most recent clinical studies. Advancements over the past decade have expanded the variety of fixation options available; however, the clinical superiority of a particular treatment modality remains without consensus. Each approach requires the use of unique surgical techniques, and the choice of a particular implant system should be based on the surgeon's familiarity with the implant design and its limitations. As our understanding of the management of distal radius fractures improves, so will our indications for each specific treatment modality.