Comparison of cell therapy and other novel adjunctive therapies combined with core decompression for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head : a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 studies

The pandemic is gone but its consequences are here to stay: avascular necrosis following corticosteroids administration for severe COVID-19

BACKGROUND

In patients with COVID-19 infection and respiratory insufficiency, corticosteroid (CCS) administration is recommended. Among the wide range of complications and interactions, time-limited high-dose CCS administration might promote avascular necrosis (AVN) in a cumulative dose. This systematic review updated the current evidence and characterises the trend of AVN following time-limited high-dose CCS administration in patients who had severe COVID-19, discussing management strategies and outcomes.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. In October 2023, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus restricting the search to the years 2019 to 2023. All the clinical studies which investigated the association between time-limited high-dose CCS administration in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and AVN were accessed.

RESULTS

A total of 245 patients (9 studies) who experienced AVN following COVID-19 were included in the present investigation. 26% (63 of 245 included patients) were women. The mean age of the patients was 42.9 ± 17.7 years. Four studies focused on AVN of the hip and two on the knee, and the other studies included patients with AVN from mixed areas of the body (spine, pelvis, and shoulder). The mean time elapsed from COVID-19 infection to the development of symptomatic AVN was 79.4 ± 59.2 days (range, 14 to 166 days).

CONCLUSION

It is possible that even time-limited high-dose CCS administration in patients with severe COVID-19 infection increased the incidence of AVN. The mean time elapsed from COVID-19 infection to the development of symptomatic AVN was approximately 80 days. Given the high risk of bias in all the included studies, the quality of recommendations of the present investigation is low, and no reliable conclusion can be inferred.

Systematic analysis of hip-preserving treatment for early osteonecrosis of the femoral head from the perspective of bibliometrics (2010-2023)

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a serious condition that causes bone tissue death, femoral head collapse, and hip joint destruction. Early intervention through hip-preserving treatment is crucial to slow down disease progression, preserve hip joint function, and improve the quality of life of patients. We analyzed the knowledge map, research gaps, and future research directions in the field of hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH.

METHODS

All publications related to hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH published between 2010 and 2023 were identified from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using VOSviewer 1.6.19, CiteSpace 6.2.R2, and Scimago Graphica 1.0.35.

RESULTS

In total, 234 articles were analyzed. The results showed an exponential growth trend in the number of publications related to hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH in the past decade. China and the USA were the main contributors. International Orthopaedics published the most papers in this field, whereas Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume had the highest average citation count per article. Several stable research topics were noted in this field, including core decompression (CD), osteotomy, bone transplantation in hip-preserving surgery, and cell therapy, which have become research hotspots in hip-preserving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH has received increasing attention, and research in this field is expected to grow. Stable research topics include core decompression (CD), osteotomy, bone transplantation, and cell therapy. Future research is predicted to focus on cell therapy and combination therapy, resulting in an increasing number of publications on hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH.

The efficiency of genetically modified mesenchymal stromal cells combined with a functionally graded scaffold for bone regeneration in corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head in rabbits

Core decompression (CD) with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is an effective therapy for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Preconditioning of MSCs, using inflammatory mediators, is widely used in immunology and various cell therapies. We developed a three-dimensional printed functionally graded scaffold (FGS), made of β-TCP and PCL, for cell delivery at a specific location. The present study examined the efficacy of CD treatments with genetically modified (GM) MSCs over-expressing PDGF-BB (PDGF-MSCs) or GM MSCs co-over-expressing IL-4 and PDGF-BB and preconditioned for three days of exposure to lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (IL-4-PDGF-pMSCs) using the FGS for treating steroid-induced ONFH in rabbits. We compared CD without cell-therapy, with IL-4-PDGF-pMSCs alone, and with FGS loaded with PDGF-MSCs or IL-4-PDGF-pMSCs. For the area inside the CD, the bone volume in the CD alone was higher than in both FGS groups. The IL-4-PDGF-pMSCs alone and FGS + PDGF-MSCs reduced the occurrence of empty lacunae and improved osteoclastogenesis. There was no significant difference in angiogenesis among the four groups. The combined effect of GM MSCs or pMSCs and the FGS was not superior to the effect of each alone. To establish an important adjunctive therapy for CD for early ONFH in the future, it is necessary and essential to develop an FGS that delivers biologics appropriately and provides structural and mechanical support.

Prognosis of hip osteonecrosis after cell therapy with a calculator and artificial intelligence: ten year collapse-free survival prediction on three thousand and twenty one hips

PURPOSE

Several reports have identified prognostic factors for hip osteonecrosis treated with cell therapy, but no study investigated the accuracy of artificial intelligence method such as machine learning and artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the efficiency of the treatment. We determined the benefit of cell therapy compared with core decompression or natural evolution, and developed machine-learning algorithms for predicting ten year collapse-free survival in hip osteonecrosis treated with cell therapy. Using the best algorithm, we propose a calculator for "prognosis hip osteonecrosis cell therapy (PHOCT)" accessible for clinical use.

METHODS

A total of 3145 patients with 5261 osteonecroses without collapses were included in this study, comprising 1321 (42%) men and 1824 (58%) women, with a median age of 34 (12-62) years. Cell therapy was the treatment for 3021 hips, core decompression alone for 1374 hips, while absence of treatment was the control group of 764 hips. First, logistic regression and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to compare results of the three groups at ten years. Then an artificial neural network model was developed for ten year collapse-free survival after cell therapy. The models' performances were compared. The algorithms were assessed by calibration, and performance, and with c-statistic as measure of discrimination. It ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 1.0 being perfect discrimination and 0.5 poor (no better than chance at making a prediction).

RESULTS

Among the 3021 hips with cell therapy, 1964 hips (65%) were collapse-free survival at ten years, versus 453 (33%) among those 1374 treated with core decompression alone, and versus 115 (15%) among 764 hips with natural evolution. We analyzed factors influencing the prediction of collapse-free period with classical statistics and artificial intelligence among hips with cell therapy. After selecting variables, a machine learning algorithm created a prognosis osteonecrosis cell therapy calculator (POCT). This calculator proved to have good accuracy on validation in these series of 3021 hip osteonecroses treated with cell therapy. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.871 suggesting good-to-excellent discrimination when all the osteonecroses were mixed. The c-statistics were calculated separately for subpopulations of categorical osteonecroses. It retained good accuracy, but underestimated ten year survival in some subgroups, suggesting that specific calculators could be useful for some subgroups. This study highlights the importance of multimodal evaluation of patient parameters and shows the degree to which the outcome is modified by some decisions that are within a surgeon's control, as the number of cells to aspirate, the choice of injecting in both the osteonecrosis and the healthy bone, the choice between unilateral or bilateral injection, and the possibility to do a repeat injection.

CONCLUSION

Many disease conditions and the heterogeneities of patients are causes of variation of outcome after cell therapy for osteonecrosis. Predicting therapeutic effectiveness with a calculator allows a good discrimination to target patients who are most likely to benefit from this intervention.

Regenerative medicine for osteonecrosis of the femoral head : present and future

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):5-8.

Is There an Association Between Femoral Head Collapse and Acetabular Coverage in Patients With Osteonecrosis?

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) classification systems are based on the size, volume, and location of necrotic lesions. Often-but not always-ONFH results in femoral head collapse. Because acetabular coverage is associated with mechanical stress on the femoral head, it might also be associated with femoral head collapse in patients with ONFH. However, the association between acetabular coverage and femoral head collapse in these patients has not been established.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is femoral head collapse associated with acetabular coverage or pelvic incidence (PI) in patients with ONFH? (2) Are established predictors of femoral head collapse in ONFH classification systems associated with acetabular coverage?

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2018, we evaluated 343 hips in 218 patients with ONFH. We considered all patients with ONFH except for those with a traumatic etiology, a history of surgical treatment before collapse, or those with collapse at initial presentation as potentially eligible for this study. Of those, 101 hips with ONFH (50% [50] were in males with a mean age of 44 ± 15 years) met our inclusion criteria. These patients were subsequently divided into two groups: those with femoral head collapse within 12 months (collapse group, 35 hips) and those without femoral head collapse (noncollapse group, 66 hips). No differences in patient demographics were observed between the two groups. CT images were used to measure the PI and acetabular coverage in three planes: the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) in the coronal plane, the anterior and posterior center-edge angle in the sagittal plane, and the anterior and posterior acetabular sector angle in the axial plane; in addition, the difference between these parameters was investigated between the groups. The thresholds for femoral head collapse in the parameters that showed differences were investigated. Necrotic location and size were evaluated using the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification and the Steinberg grade classification, respectively. We examined the relationship between these parameters and classifications.

RESULTS

The mean LCEA was slightly greater in the noncollapse group than in the collapse group (32° ± 6° versus 28° ± 7°; mean difference 4° [95% CI 1.15° to 6.46°]; p = 0.005); the clinical importance of this small difference is uncertain. There were no differences in PI between the two groups. After accounting for sex, age, BMI, and etiology as confounding factors, as well as acetabular coverage parameters and PI, we found a lower LCEA to be independently associated with increased odds of collapse, although the effect size is small and of questionable importance (OR 1.18 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.33]; p = 0.001). The threshold of LCEA for femoral head collapse was 28° (sensitivity = 0.79, specificity = 0.60, area under the curve = 0.73). The percentage of patients with an LCEA less than 28° was larger in JIC Type C1 (OR 6.52 [95% CI 1.64 to 43.83]; p = 0.006) and C2 (OR 9.84 [95% CI 2.34 to 68.38]; p = 0.001) than in patients with both Type A and Type B. The acetabular coverage data for the excluded patients did not differ from those of the patients included in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that acetabular coverage appears to have little, if any, association with the likelihood of collapse in patients with ONFH. We found a small association between a lower LCEA and a higher odds of collapse, but the effect size may not be clinically important. Factors other than acetabular coverage need to be considered, and if our findings are verified by other investigators, osteotomy is unlikely to have a protective role. As the patients in our study were fairly homogeneous in terms of ethnicity and BMI, these factors need to be further investigated to determine whether they are associated with femoral head collapse in ONFH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Volume and location of bone regeneration after autologous expanded mesenchymal stromal cells in hip osteonecrosis : a pilot study

AIMS

Successful cell therapy in hip osteonecrosis (ON) may help to avoid ON progression or total hip arthroplasty (THA), but the achieved bone regeneration is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate amount and location of bone regeneration obtained after surgical injection of expanded autologous mesenchymal stromal cells from the bone marrow (BM-hMSCs).

METHODS

A total of 20 patients with small and medium-size symptomatic stage II femoral head ON treated with 140 million BM-hMSCs through percutaneous forage in the EudraCT 2012-002010-39 clinical trial were retrospectively evaluated through preoperative and postoperative (three and 12 months) MRI. Then, 3D reconstruction of the original lesion and the observed postoperative residual damage after bone regeneration were analyzed and compared per group based on treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative lesion volume was 18.7% (SD 10.2%) of the femoral head. This reduced to 11.6% (SD 7.5%) after three months (p = 0.015) and 3.7% (SD 3%) after one year (p < 0.001). Bone regeneration in healed cases represented a mean 81.2% (SD 13.8%) of the initial lesion volume at one year. Non-healed cases (n = 1 stage progression; n = 3 THAs) still showed bone regeneration but this did not effectively decrease the ON volume. A lesion size under mean 10% (SD 6%) of the femoral head at three months predicted no ON stage progression at one year. Regeneration in the lateral femoral head (C2 under Japanese Investigation Committee (JCI) classification) and in the central and posterior regions of the head was predominant in cases without ON progression.

CONCLUSION

Bone regeneration was observed in osteonecrotic femoral heads three months after expanded autologous BM-hMSC injection, and the volume and location of regeneration indicated the success of the therapy.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(12):881-889.

Multiple Drilling with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Korean Patients with Non-Traumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study with a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up

We sought to determine whether multiple drilling (MD) combined with the injection of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) could improve survival of the femoral head in pre-collapse lesions of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) as compared with MD alone. We conducted a single-site, off-label, comparative and prospective cohort study between November 2017 and May 2019. We enrolled 25 hips (25 patients) with non-traumatic ONFH (Ficat–Arlet stage 2A or less). We performed a survival analysis, and the primary outcome was the occurrence of femoral head collapse on follow-up radiograph. Our cohort consisted of 11 men and 9 women of age 52.5 ± 8.8 years and a body mass index of 24.3 ± 3.0 kg/m². The femoral heads were preserved in 9 hips (45.0%) and collapsed in 11 hips (55.0%) at the final follow-up; mean survival to collapse was 6.9 (range 2.8–13.5) months. There were no significant differences in the survival of the femoral head between the MD alone group and the MD with rhBMP-2 and β-TCP group (five hips survived, 50% vs. four hips survived, 40%, respectively; p = 0.83). MD combined with the injection of rhBMP-2 and β-TCP did not improve femoral head survival compared to MD alone in the pre-collapse non-traumatic ONFH lesion.

Effect on Osteogenic Differentiation of Genetically Modified IL4 or PDGF-BB Over-Expressing and IL4-PDGF-BB Co-Over-Expressing Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells In Vitro

The use of genetically modified (GM) mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and preconditioned MSCs (pMSCs) may provide further opportunities to improve the outcome of core decompression (CD) for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). GM interleukin-4 (IL4) over-expressing MSCs (IL4-MSCs), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB over-expressing MSCs (PDGF-BB-MSCs), and IL4-PDGF-BB co-over-expressing MSCs (IL4-PDGF-BB-MSCs) and their respective pMSCs were used in this in vitro study and compared with respect to cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. IL4-MSCs, PDGF-BB-MSCs, IL4-PDGF-BB-MSCs, and each pMSC treatment significantly increased cell proliferation compared to the MSC group alone. The percentage of Alizarin red-stained area in the IL4-MSC and IL4-pMSC groups was significantly lower than in the MSC group. However, the percentage of Alizarin red-stained area in the PDGF-BB-MSC group was significantly higher than in the MSC and PDGF-BB-pMSC groups. The percentage of Alizarin red-stained area in the IL4-PDGF-BB-pMSC was significantly higher than in the IL4-PDGF-BB-MSC group. There were no significant differences in the percentage of Alizarin red-stained area between the MSC and IL4-PDGF-BB-pMSC groups. The use of PDGF-BB-MSCs or IL4-PDGF-BB-pMSCs increased cell proliferation. Furthermore, PDGF-BB-MSCs promoted osteogenic differentiation. The addition of GM MSCs may provide a useful supplementary cell-based therapy to CD for treatment of ONFH.