Natural acetabular orientation in arthritic hips

High accuracy of positioning custom triflange acetabular components in tumour and total hip arthroplasty revision surgery

Aims

Custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) play an important role in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, particularly in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and pelvic tumour resection procedures. Accurate CTAC positioning is essential to successful surgical outcomes. While prior studies have explored CTAC positioning in rTHA, research focusing on tumour cases and implant flange positioning precision remains limited. Additionally, the impact of intraoperative navigation on positioning accuracy warrants further investigation. This study assesses CTAC positioning accuracy in tumour resection and rTHA cases, focusing on the differences between preoperative planning and postoperative implant positions.

Methods

A multicentre observational cohort study in Australia between February 2017 and March 2021 included consecutive patients undergoing acetabular reconstruction with CTACs in rTHA (Paprosky 3A/3B defects) or tumour resection (including Enneking P2 peri-acetabular area). Of 103 eligible patients (104 hips), 34 patients (35 hips) were analyzed.

Results

CTAC positioning was generally accurate, with minor deviations in cup inclination (mean 2.7°; SD 2.84°), anteversion (mean 3.6°; SD 5.04°), and rotation (mean 2.1°; SD 2.47°). Deviation of the hip centre of rotation (COR) showed a mean vector length of 5.9 mm (SD 7.24). Flange positions showed small deviations, with the ischial flange exhibiting the largest deviation (mean vector length of 7.0 mm; SD 8.65). Overall, 83% of the implants were accurately positioned, with 17% exceeding malpositioning thresholds. CTACs used in tumour resections exhibited higher positioning accuracy than rTHA cases, with significant differences in inclination (1.5° for tumour vs 3.4° for rTHA) and rotation (1.3° for tumour vs 2.4° for rTHA). The use of intraoperative navigation appeared to enhance positioning accuracy, but this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates favourable CTAC positioning accuracy, with potential for improved accuracy through intraoperative navigation. Further research is needed to understand the implications of positioning accuracy on implant performance and long-term survival.

Relative Acetabular Retroversion and Its Association With Earlier-Onset Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Background

Hip osteoarthritis is associated with an aging population with the average total hip arthroplasty patient in the U.S. approximately 65 years of age. Although there is an association between femoroacetabular impingement and early arthritis, there is a paucity of data attributed to variation in native acetabular version and early onset osteoarthritis. We investigated that whether patients with relative acetabular retroversion are predisposed to earlier hip osteoarthritis.

Methods

Five hundred sixteen charts of patients undergoing THA by a single surgeon between March 2018 and May 2022 were reviewed (221 male and 295 female subjects; mean age 66.7 years [standard deviation (SD) 9.8]). Patients with advanced dysplasia, who are post-traumatic, septic, have inflammatory arthritis, and osteonecrosis were excluded. Operative hip anteversion was measured using three-dimensional computed tomography. A univariate analysis was used to correlate the age of male and female subjects with anteversion angles of ≤15° and >15°. The effect of age and gender on version angle was studied using a multivariate linear regression model.

Results

In patients with anteversion ≤15°, both male (P = .006) and female subjects (P = .015) presented at significantly lesser age (male: 98, avg. age: 63.7, SD: 8.7; female: 62, avg. age: 64.8, SD: 9.8) than those with anteversion >15° (male: 123, avg. age: 67.2, SD: 10.2; female: 233, avg. age: 68.2, SD: 9.8). Male subjects had lower anteversion than female subjects with age held constant (P < .001), and older patients had increased anteversion with gender held constant (P < .001).

Conclusions

This study suggests that patients with a relatively decreased version angle (≤15°) are more likely to present with earlier-onset symptomatic hip osteoarthritis.

Advances in fixation strength of reorienting rectangular triple pelvic innominate osteotomies - A biomechanical investigation of two screw fixation techniques

BACKGROUND

Reorientating pelvic osteotomies are performed to prevent femoral-acetabular impingement or degenerative arthritis. A Toennis-Kalchschmidt triple pelvis innominate osteotomy is used in symptomatic patients. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical behaviour of two different acetabular screw configurations for triple pelvis innominate osteotomy osteosynthesis.

METHODS

Two screw-orientation techniques in rectangular os ilium osteotomy were compared by osteotomising 12 artificial hemipelvises with triple pelvis innominate osteotomy protocol (fragment reorientation: 10.5° inclination and 10.0° anteversion) and randomising them in 2 groups (n = 6) for implantation with three 4.5 mm screws. Bidirectional group had a bidirectional screw orientation and Monoaxial group had a monoaxial direction of all three screws through iliac crest. All specimens were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading until failure. Group-wise comparisons of acetabular cup medialisation, anteversion and inclination were evaluated via motion tracking at cycles 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750, 2000, 2250, and 2500. Failure was defined as reaching 5° inclination or 5° anteversion.

FINDINGS

Acetabular cup medialisation (p ≤ 0.026), anteversion (p ≤ 0.021) and inclination (p ≤ 0.039) all increased significantly during testing in both groups. There were no significant differences for the group-wise comparisons at the cycle points defined in the methods (p ≥ 0.182). No significant differences were detected between groups for cycles to failure and failure load (p = 0.873).

INTERPRETATION

Bidirectional screw alignment does not lead to significant advantages compared to pure monoaxial if all three axial screws are evenly distributed over the osteotomy geometry. The triple pelvis innominate osteotomy is susceptible to changes in anteversion, inclination and medialisation under partial weight-bearing. Cautious rehabilitation protocols are recommended.

Orientation of Transverse Acetabular Ligament With Reference to Anterior Pelvic Plane

Background

Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a 3-dimensional structure which cannot be defined by a single plane. Therefore, we aimed at describing the orientation of different parts of TAL with respect to anterior pelvic plane (APP) and correlate it with gender, body mass index (BMI), and Lewinnek’s safe zone.

Methods

A total of 109 consecutive patients undergoing imageless navigated THA were prospectively studied. Computer navigation was used as the measurement tool. APP was registered for navigation. After excision of osteophytes, a trial component matching the size of unreamed acetabular cavity was aligned with acetabular rim, outer and inner margins, and middle of TAL to record cup orientation with computer tracker.

Results

Ninety-nine patients (41 males and 58 females, mean BMI of 28.8kg/m²) were studied after applying exclusion criteria. Mean acetabular inclination was 55.15°, 53.00°, 47.70°, and 42.60° respectively, for acetabular rim, outer, middle, and inner margins of the TAL. Corresponding mean acetabular anteversion was 6.63°, 7.41°, 11.23° and 14.90°respectively. Overall, 17.17%, 28.28%, 47.47% and 71.71% of cup orientation corresponding to acetabular rim, outer, middle, and inner margin of TAL respectively, were within Lewinnek’s safe zone. No association was established between BMI and acetabular orientation. Males had overall lesser anteversion than females.

Conclusion

We describe orientation of outer, middle, and inner margins of TAL, as reference planes for TAL, in relation to APP. The anteversion differs significantly with gender. A knowledge about these will assist surgeon in component placement during THA, with inner margin of TAL providing the best chance of orientation out of the studied landmarks.

Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted

BACKGROUND

Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

METHODS

A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms 'Lewinnek,' 'safe zone,' and 'total hip arthroplasty.' Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

RESULTS

A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

Electromagnetic navigation system for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty is more precise and accurate than the freehand technique: a randomized, controlled trial with 84 patients

Background and purpose - The accuracy of conventional navigation systems depends on precise registration of bony landmarks. We investigated the clinical use of electromagnetic navigation (EMN), with a unique device for precise determination of the anterior pelvic plane. Patients and methods - We randomly allocated patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty into 2 groups of 42 patients each. In the study group, cups were placed at the predetermined target angles (inclination: 42.5°; anteversion: 15°) with the support of EMN. In the control group, cups were placed freehand aiming at the same target angles. Postoperatively the true position of the cup was determined using computed tomography scan of the pelvis. Precision (root mean squared error, RMSE) bias (mean bias error, ME), accuracy, and duration of surgery were compared between the methods. Results - Cup anteversion was more accurate and precise in the navigated group. The ME in the navigated and freehand group was -1.7° (95% CI -2.4 to 1.1) and -4.5° (CI -6.5 to 2.5), respectively. The RMSE in the navigated and freehand group was 2.8° (CI 2.3-3.2) and 8.0° (CI 6.3-9.5), respectively. The inclination was also more precise in the navigated group, with the RMSE in the navigated and freehand group at 4.6° (CI 3.4-5.9) and 6.5° (CI 5.4-7.5), respectively. The accuracy of the inclination and the duration of surgeries were similar between the groups. Interpretation - Cup placement with the help of EMN is more precise than the freehand technique and it does not affect the duration of surgery.

Use of a Dual mobility cup to prevent hip early arthroplasty dislocation in patients at high falls risk

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture is a common serious injury that occurs mainly in elderly. Dual-mobility hip arthroplasty or bipolar emiarthroplasty for its treatment remains a controversial decision. Co-morbidities and risk of fall represent additional aspects to be considered. The aim of our study was to determine the rate of mechanical complications for these two types of implants related to fall risk status of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study is a retrospective clinical trial of patients operated with a biarticular hemiarthroplasty or a dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty. Primary outcome was dislocation rate and need for any revision procedure. Patients were treated in a single center from January 2013 to March 2017. In all cases Morse Fall Scale (MSF) was calculated at patient admission to evaluate the risk of postoperative fall. Inclusion criteria to the study were: subcapital or femoral neck fracture of non-pathologic nature, patients with neuromuscular disorders or cognitive dysfunction, age > 75 years with MFS ≥ 45. The patients were reviewed postoperatively at 8 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually. Patients had clinical (Harris hip score) and radiological assessment.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the follow-up was 283 months. There were five dislocations in Group A (5,6%) and no dislocations in Group B (0%). All dislocations occurred within the first 6 months after surgery. The mean Harris Hip score was 81,7 in Group A patients and 79, 8 in Group B patients.

DISCUSSION

Treatment of hip fractures on non-cooperative patients still represents a dilemma. Falls and runaway motions represent high risk factors of dislocation. Use of dual-mobility cup has been found to be associated with a not statistically proved decrease of dislocation compared to traditional cups.

CONCLUSION

Dual-mobility cups might be considered a valuable option to prevent postoperative dislocation but further study is needed before extending the indications for dual-mobility following a fracture of the femoral neck, to assess the potential cost and complications of a longer procedure. So far, despite a lower dislocation risk, the authors actually cannot recommend widely use of a dual-motility cup instead of emiarthroplasty in high falls risk patients.

Can an Augmented Reality Headset Improve Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Orientation in Simulated THA? A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Accurate implant orientation reduces wear and increases stability in arthroplasty but is a technically demanding skill. Augmented reality (AR) headsets overlay digital information on top of the real world. We have developed an enhanced AR headset capable of tracking bony anatomy in relation to an implant, but it has not yet been assessed for its suitability as a training tool for implant orientation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) In the setting of simulated THA performed by novices, does an AR headset improve the accuracy of acetabular component positioning compared with hands-on training by an expert surgeon? (2) What are trainees' perceptions of the AR headset in terms of realism of the task, acceptability of the technology, and its potential role for surgical training?

METHODS

Twenty-four study participants (medical students in their final year of school, who were applying to surgery residency programs, and who had no prior arthroplasty experience) participated in a randomized simulation trial using an AR headset and a simulated THA. Participants were randomized to two groups completing four once-weekly sessions of baseline assessment, training, and reassessment. One group trained using AR (with live holographic orientation feedback) and the other received one-on-one training from a hip arthroplasty surgeon. Demographics and baseline performance in orienting an acetabular implant to six patient-specific values on the phantom pelvis were collected before training and were comparable. The orientation error in degrees between the planned and achieved orientations was measured and was not different between groups with the numbers available (surgeon group mean error ± SD 16° ± 7° versus AR 14° ± 7°; p = 0.22). Participants trained by AR also completed a validated posttraining questionnaire evaluating their experiences.

RESULTS

During the four training sessions, participants using AR-guidance had smaller mean (± SD) errors in orientation than those receiving guidance from the surgeon: 1° ± 1° versus AR 6° ± 4°, p < 0.001. In the fourth session's assessment, participants in both groups had improved (surgeon group mean improvement 6°, 95% CI, 4-8°; p < 0.001 versus AR group 9°, 95% CI 7-10°; p < 0.001). There was no difference between participants in the surgeon-trained and AR-trained group: mean difference 1.2°, 95% CI, -1.8 to 4.2°; p = 0.281. In posttraining evaluation, 11 of 12 participants would use the AR platform as a training tool for developing visuospatial skills and 10 of 12 for procedure-specific rehearsals. Most participants (11 of 12) stated that a combination of an expert trainer for learning and AR for unsupervised training would be preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel head-mounted AR platform tracked an implant in relation to bony anatomy to a clinically relevant level of accuracy during simulated THA. Learners were equally accurate, whether trained by AR or a surgeon. The platform enabled the use of real instruments and gave live feedback; AR was thus considered a feasible and valuable training tool as an adjunct to expert guidance in the operating room. Although there were no differences in accuracy between the groups trained using AR and those trained by an expert surgeon, we believe the tool may be useful in education because it demonstrates that some motor skills for arthroplasty may be learned in an unsupervised setting. Future studies will evaluate AR-training for arthroplasty skills other than cup orientation and its transfer validity to real surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Prior work suggests that computer-assisted navigation improves acetabular component position during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, it is not known whether this translates to improvements in clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to test for associations between navigation use and the risk of dislocation, aseptic revision of the acetabular component, aseptic revision of the femoral component, aseptic revision of either component, and acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted using the 100% Medicare Part A claims data set. Inclusion criteria were an age of ≥65 years and primary THA for osteoarthritis. First, the association between navigation use and patient and hospital characteristics was assessed. Second, while controlling for these characteristics, multivariate regression was used to test for the association of navigation use and the outcomes listed above.

RESULTS

A total of 803,732 primary THA procedures were identified; 14,540 (1.81%) involved the use of navigation. Navigation use was associated with younger age, other/unknown race, the Western census region, higher socioeconomic status, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, shorter length of stay, private hospitals, teaching hospitals, and larger hospitals (p < 0.05 for each). Navigation use was associated with a lower rate of dislocation (1.00% versus 1.70% for no navigation; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 0.82; p < 0.001) and aseptic revision of the acetabular component (1.03% versus 1.55%; adjusted HR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.88; p < 0.001). Navigation was not associated with aseptic revision of the femoral component (1.54% versus 1.87%; p = 0.064), aseptic revision of either component (1.91% versus 2.31%; p = 0.077), acute PJI at 6 weeks (0.34% versus 0.45%; p = 0.121), or acute PJI at 90 days (0.50% versus 0.66%; p = 0.458).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that navigation is associated with reductions in the rates of dislocation and aseptic acetabular revision following primary THA. However, these results should be interpreted carefully in the setting of potential confounding by unmeasured variables, such as surgeon volume, family support, and patient compliance. Causality cannot be inferred until further prospective trials can vet this technology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient positioning and cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty: assessment of current UK practice

INTRODUCTION:

Acetabular cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a challenge. This is influenced by patient positioning during surgery and the method used to orientate the acetabular cup. The aim of this study was to assess current UK practice for patient positioning and cup orientation, particularly with respect to patient supports and techniques used to achieve target version and inclination.

METHODS:

A literature review and pilot study were initially conducted to develop the questionnaire, which was completed by British Hip Society members ( n = 183). As the majority of THA surgical procedures within the UK are performed with the patient in lateral decubitus, orthopaedic surgeons who operated with the patient in the supine position were excluded ( n = 18); a further 6% were incomplete and also excluded ( n = 11).

RESULTS:

Of those who operated in lateral decubitus, 76.6% ( n = 118/154) used the posterior approach. Only 31% ( n = 47/154) considered their supports to be completely rigid. More than 35% ( n = 55/154) were unhappy with the supports that they presently use. The most common methods for controlling operative inclination and version were a mechanical alignment guide (MAG; n = 78/154; 50.6%) and the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL; n = 82/154; 53.2%); 31.2% (48/154) used a freehand technique to control operative inclination.

CONCLUSION:

Limited studies have been conducted whereby patient supports have been analysed and key design principles outlined. With 35.7% of the orthopaedic surgeons surveyed having issues with their current supports, a greater awareness of essential characteristics for patient supports is required.

Variability of Pelvic Orientation in the Lateral Decubitus Position: Are External Alignment Guides Trustworthy?

BACKGROUND

The position of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is critical for success. However, this remains the most variable aspect of the surgery. We hypothesized that there is wide variation in pelvic orientation in the lateral decubitus position. We sought to determine the variability in pelvic positioning and the frequency of pelvic malposition during THA in lateral decubitus with regard to pelvic tilt and pelvic rotation.

METHODS

We analyzed preoperative standing and intraoperative anteroposterior pelvis X-rays in 248 consecutive THAs performed in lateral decubitus by one surgeon. Pelvic tilt and rotation were determined for preoperative and intraoperative X-rays. Proper intraoperative positioning was defined as less than 10° change in tilt or rotation between preoperative and intraoperative X-rays.

RESULTS

With regard to pelvic tilt, the intraoperative position was proper in 188 (76%) cases. There was a pelvic tilt discrepancy of 10°-20° in 43 (17.5%) cases and greater than 20° in 16 (6.5%) patients. With regard to pelvic rotation, the intraoperative position was proper in 202 (81%) cases. There was a pelvic rotation discrepancy of 10°-20° in 38 (15.4%) cases and greater than 20° in 7 (2.8%) cases. In 248 cases, only 154 (62.1%) had intraoperative positioning within 10° of preoperative tilt and axial rotation. Pelvic malposition occurred in 38% of cases overall.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variation in pelvic orientation in lateral decubitus and frequent discrepancy in pelvic tilt and rotation between preoperative and intraoperative anteroposterior X-rays. Anatomic landmarks should be used to guide acetabular component positioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Diagnostic.

Variations in pelvic dimensions: An anatomical and computed tomography study

The anterior pelvic plane (APP) is a useful anatomical reference with both clinical and research applications in orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. It is used as a marker for computer-assisted total hip replacement and image-guided assessment of the hip center in clinical gait analysis. Despite its common use, no published data exist on the variations in height and width in an adult population. The aim of this study was to determine the range of dimensions for the anterior pelvic plane found in the Scottish adult population. Thirty-five human cadavers and 100 pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans were examined. Pelvic height and width were measured, and the ratios were determined. The mean width and height for combined cadaver and CT pelves were found to be 238.0 mm (SD 20.1, range 188.3-273.8) and 92.7 mm (SD 10.5, range 71.2-114.7), respectively. The mean width-to-height ratio for all pelves was 2.59 (SD 0.31, range 1.73-3.50). There were no statistically significant differences in means between males and females. The variations of APP dimensions within an adult population are presented. These will be of value in the validation of algorithms for computer navigation and hip joint center calculation in total hip arthroplasty and gait analysis. Furthermore, differences in dimensions between cadaveric and CT measurements have been shown which may have implications for further research and the validity of reference data dependent on data-point acquisition. Clin. Anat. 31:981-987, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Computer assisted navigation in total knee and hip arthroplasty

Introduction: Computer assisted surgery was pioneered in early 1990s. The first computer assisted surgery (CAS) total knee replacement with an imageless system was carried out in 1997. In the past 25 years, CAS has progressed from experimental in vitro studies to established in vivo surgical procedures.

Methods: A comprehensive body of evidence establishing the advantages of computer assisted surgery in knee and hip arthroplasty is available. Established benefits have been demonstrated including its role as an excellent research tool. Its advantages include dynamic pre-operative and per-operative assessment, increased accuracy in correction of deformities, kinematics and mechanical axis, a better alignment of components, better survival rates of prostheses and a better functional outcome. Adoption of computer navigation in the hip arthroplasty is still at an early stage compared to knee arthroplasty, though the results are well documented. Evidence suggests improved accuracy in acetabular orientation, positioning, hip offset and leg length correction.

Results: Among the orthopaedic surgeons, navigated knee arthroplasty is gaining popularity though slowly. The uptake rates vary from country to country. The Australian joint registry data shows increased navigated knee arthroplasty from 2.4% in 2003 to 28.6% in 2015 and decreased revision rates with navigated knee arthroplasty in comparison with traditional instrumented knee arthroplasty in patient cohort under the age of 55 years.

Conclusion: Any new technology has a learning curve and with practice the navigation assisted knee and hip arthroplasty becomes easy. We have actively followed the evidence of CAS in orthopaedics and have successfully adopted it in our routine practice over the last decades. Despite the cautious inertia of orthopaedic surgeons to embrace CAS more readily; we are certain that computer technology has a pivotal role in lower limb arthroplasty. It will evolve to become a standard practice in the future in various forms like navigation or robotics.

Computer navigation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a narrative review

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure for primary osteoarthritis, but increasing numbers are also being performed for other pathologies such as secondary arthritis, inflammatory arthropathies and trauma. Estimates suggest that around 8.5 million people in the UK are affected by joint pain secondary to arthritis and a rising ageing population has resulted in an increase in THA operations of around 4% per year over the last six years.

Multiple studies have shown that THA provides improved quality of life scores, but there remains the burden of complications which account for 15% of £1bn NHS liability payouts. DaPalma et al analysed the financial impact of complications following THA and found the additional cost of a dislocation within six weeks of surgery is 342% of the primary cost.

Following primary THA, complications may occur as a result of incorrect component positioning of the femoral stem, the acetabular cup or both. It is known that acetabular malposition may lead to increased rates of dislocation, impingement, edge-loading, polyethylene wear, pelvic osteolysis and prosthesis failure.

Acetabular component positioning has been described as the single most important factor in dictating risk of dislocation following THA. Furthermore, instability and dislocation after primary THA is the most common single reason for revision surgery accounting for 22.5% of all revisions and 33% of acetabular revisions.

We outline the currently available methods of acetabular navigation comparing freehand techniques with computer and robotic-assisted navigation of the acetabular component.

Cite this article: Davenport D, Kavarthapu V. Computer navigation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a narrative review. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:279-285. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000050.

Three-Dimensional Templating for Acetabular Component Alignment During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Appropriate placement of the acetabular cup is an important determinant of implant stability and longevity. Malposition of acetabular cups negatively influences prosthesis survival and leads to an increased dislocation rate. The objective of the study was to determine the role of 3-dimensional templating in obtaining accurate acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty. In this computed tomography-based study, the authors identified 93 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with computer-assisted navigation. Using 3-dimensional planning, the authors templated the acetabular component at an inclination of 40° and anteversion of 20°. To classify acetabular cup coverage by bone, the acetabulum was used as a clock face with the center of the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) as 6-o'clock. Analyses revealed that 72% of cups were uncovered between 9- to 1-o'clock for right hips. On the left side, 88% of cups were uncovered between 11- to 3-o'clock. Across all hips, 74% of cups had a 1-o'clock position at the most lateral aspect. Further analysis revealed that 46% of acetabular cups had a teardrop at the same level of the most inferior aspect of the cup, whereas only 37% of cups had a teardrop above the inferior aspect of the cup. Finally, the acetabular component was aligned with the TAL in 76% of hips, retroverted to the TAL in 16%, and anteverted to the TAL in 8%. The current study demonstrates a useful gross intraoperative reference tool to standardize cup position without the need for additional equipment and reliance on anatomical landmarks. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e708-e713.].

Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: Analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) acetabular orientation is a fundamental topic in orthopedic surgery. Computed tomography (CT) allows 3D measurement of native acetabular orientation, but with a substantial radiation dose. The EOS imaging system was developed to perform this kind of evaluation, but has not been validated in this indication with specific attention to the acetabulum. We therefore performed a prospective study using EOS to assess: (1) the reproducibility of the 3D acetabulum orientation measures; (2) normative asymptomatic acetabular morphology in standing position, according to side and gender; and (3) the relationship between acetabular anteversion and pelvic incidence.

HYPOTHESIS

The low-dose EOS imaging system is a reproducible method for measuring 3D acetabular orientation in standing position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a previous prospective study of spine sagittal balance, 165 asymptomatic volunteers were examined on whole-body EOS biplanar X-ray; 102 had appropriate images for pelvic and acetabular analysis, with an equal sex-ratio (53 female, 49 male). These EOS images were reviewed using sterEOS 3D software, allowing automatic measurement of acetabular parameters (anteversion and inclination) and pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope) in an anatomical (anterior pelvic plane: APP) and a functional reference plane (patient vertical plane: PVP).

RESULTS

Both intra- and inter-observer analysis showed good agreement (ICC>0.90); Bland-Altman plot distributions were good. Acetabular anatomical anteversion and inclination relative to APP (AAAPP and AIAPP, respectively) were significantly greater in women than in men, with no effect of side (right AAA: women 21.3°±3.4° vs. men 16.1°±3.3° (P<0001); right AIAPP: women 55.3°±3.7° vs. men 52.5°±3.0° (P<0001); left AAAPP: women 20.9°±3.5° vs. men 15.6°±4.0° (P<0001); left AIAPP: women 54.6°±3.5° vs. men 52.7°±2.8° (P=0003)). The same differences between men and women were observed when measurements were related to PVP. Pelvic incidence subgroup (<44°; 44-62°; >62°) correlated significantly with functional acetabular orientation in standing position: PVP functional anteversion decreased by 5° relative to APP anteversion with incidence <44°, was equal to APP with incidence 44-62°, and or was greater by 4° relative to APP with incidence >62°.

DISCUSSION

The use of a 3D sterEOS software prototype version for 3D reconstruction of the native acetabulum from standard EOS X-ray was shown to be a reliable and reproducible method. This innovative method enabled the reference values of 3D acetabular orientation in standing position to be measured for the first time. The results reinforced the concept of hip-spine relationships, and involved very low radiation dose.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV prospective study without control group.

Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Repeatability and Reliability of EOS 3-Dimensional Imaging Analysis Software

BACKGROUND

Quantifying ideal component position for the acetabulum and stem during total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been described by many methods. A new imaging method using low-dose digital stereoradiography, the EOS imaging system, is a biplanar low-dose X-ray system that allows for 3-dimensional modeling of lower limbs and semiautomated measurement of pelvic parameters and implant alignment.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent primary THA by a single surgeon between October 2014 and December 2014 were retrospectively selected. Only patients with unilateral THA without associated spine pathologies were included, totaling 16 right hips and 9 left hips. There were 8 men and 17 women in the cohort, with a mean age of 67 years (range, 53-82). Three individuals performed measurements of pelvic parameters and implant alignment on 3 separate occasions. An interclass correlation of >0.75 was accepted as evidence of excellent agreement and a confirmation of measurement reliability.

RESULTS

Before reviewing patient radiographs, 4 pelvic phantom models were analyzed using the EOS 3-dimensional software to verify accuracy. All anatomic and implant measurements performed by the 3 independent reviewers showed interobserver and intraobserver agreement with interclass correlation >0.75.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional modeling of hip implants with the EOS imaging system is a reasonable option for the evaluation of component position after THA.

The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip

We evaluated the accuracy with which a custom-made acetabular component could be positioned at revision arthroplasty of the hip in patients with a Paprosky type 3 acetabular defect.

A total of 16 patients with a Paprosky type 3 defect underwent revision surgery using a custom-made trabecular titanium implant. There were four men and 12 women with a median age of 67 years (48 to 79). The planned inclination (INCL), anteversion (AV), rotation and centre of rotation (COR) of the implant were compared with the post-operative position using CT scans.

A total of seven implants were malpositioned in one or more parameters: one with respect to INCL, three with respect to AV, four with respect to rotation and five with respect to the COR.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which CT data acquired for the pre-operative planning of a custom-made revision acetabular implant have been compared with CT data on the post-operative position. The results are encouraging.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:780–5.