Day-case surgery for total hip and knee replacement: How safe and effective is it?

Complication rates are not higher after outpatient compared to inpatient fast-track total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched prospective comparative study

PURPOSE

Concerns remain with regards to safety of fast-track (FT) and especially outpatient procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and clinical outcomes of propensity-matched patients who received FT total hip arthroplasty (THA) in outpatient versus inpatient settings. The hypothesis was that 90-day postoperative complication rates of outpatient FT THA would not be higher than after inpatient FT THA.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of consecutive patients who received FT THA at various rates of outpatient and inpatient surgery by 10 senior surgeons (10 centres). The decision between outpatient and inpatient surgery was made on a case-by-case basis depending on the surgeon and patient. All patients were followed until 90 days after surgery. Complications, readmissions and reoperations were collected, and their severity was assessed according to Clavien-Dindo. Patients completed Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared to inpatient FT THA, patients scheduled for outpatient FT THA had no significant differences in 90-day postoperative complication rates (10.7% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.129). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in 90-day readmission rates and reoperation rates, in severity of postoperative complications, and in time of occurrence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in rates of intraoperative complications, 90-day postoperative complications, readmissions, or reoperations between outpatient and inpatient FT THA. These findings may help hesitant surgeons to move towards outpatient THA pathways as there is no greater risk of early postoperative complications that could be more difficult to manage after discharge.

Perioperative bleeding control in total hip arthroplasty: hemostatic powder vs. tranexamic acid-a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Perioperative bleeding in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to various problems, so effective management of blood loss is needed. This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy of topical administration of SURGICEL® (a hemostatic agent of oxidized regenerated cellulose) powder (SP) and tranexamic acid (TXA) in controlling perioperative bleeding during THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 114 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis were randomized to either group S (THA with SP) or group T (THA with TXA). Data including patient demographics, laboratory data (C-reactive protein [CRP], hemoglobin, and hematocrit), operative time, and intraoperative blood loss were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using WOMAC, JOA, FJS scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Primary outcomes were estimated total and postoperative blood loss, while secondary outcomes included hematological test results and various clinical scores.

RESULTS

57 patients were allocated to each group, with 55 in group S and 56 in group T were finally included in the analysis. There was no significant difference (p = 0.141) in estimated total blood loss between group S (788.2 ± 350.1 ml) and group T (714.1 ± 318.4 ml). Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels and WOMAC, and FJS scores were not significantly different between the two groups at any time point. CRP levels were significantly different on postoperative days 4 and 7, and JOA score was significantly different on preoperative and postoperative period. However, the differences in CRP and JOA score values themselves were relatively small and not clinically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical administration of SP is as effective as TXA in reducing perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing THA. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in early postoperative clinical outcomes between SP and TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) registration number UMIN000047607.

Implementation of a day-stay joint replacement pathway in an Australian regional public hospital: A descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the implementation, feasibility and safety of a day-stay joint replacement pathway in a regional public hospital in Australia.

METHOD

Over a 12-month pilot period, a prospective descriptive analysis of consecutive patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty was conducted. The number of eligible day-stay patients, proportion of successful same-day discharges and reasons for same-day failure to discharge were recorded. Outcome measures captured for all joint replacements across this period included length of stay (LoS), patient reported outcomes, complications and patient satisfaction. The implementation pathway as well as patient and staff identified success factors derived from interviews were outlined.

RESULTS

Forty-one/246 (17%) patients booked for joint replacement surgery were eligible for day-stay and 21/41 (51%) achieved a successful same-day discharge. Unsuccessful same-day discharges were due to time of surgery too late in the day (7/20), no longer meeting same-day discharge criteria (11/20) and declined discharge same-day (2/20). Over the implementation period 65% (162/246) of all patients were discharged with a LoS of 2 days or less. Patient satisfaction for the day-stay pathway was high. Complication rates and patient-reported outcomes were equivalent across LoS groups.

CONCLUSION

The day-stay joint replacement surgery pathway was feasible to implement, safe and acceptable to patients. Day-stay pathways have potential patient and system-level efficiency benefits.

An analysis of the effect of the COVID-19-induced joint replacement deficit in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland suggests recovery will be protracted

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the provision of arthroplasty services in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. This study aimed to quantify the backlog, analyze national trends, and predict time to recovery.

Methods

We performed an analysis of the mandatory prospective national registry of all independent and publicly funded hip, knee, shoulder, elbow, and ankle replacements in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland between January 2019 and December 2022 inclusive, totalling 729,642 operations. The deficit was calculated per year compared to a continuation of 2019 volume. Total deficit of cases between 2020 to 2022 was expressed as a percentage of 2019 volume. Sub-analyses were performed based on procedure type, country, and unit sector.

Results

Between January 2020 and December 2022, there was a deficit of 158,994 joint replacements. This is equivalent to over two-thirds of a year of normal expected operating activity (71.6%). There were 104,724 (-47.1%) fewer performed in 2020, 41,928 (-18.9%) fewer performed in 2021, and 12,342 (-5.6%) fewer performed in 2022, respectively, than in 2019. Independent-sector procedures increased to make it the predominant arthroplasty provider (53% in 2022). NHS activity was 73.2% of 2019 levels, while independent activity increased to 126.8%. Wales (-136.3%) and Northern Ireland (-121.3%) recorded deficits of more than a year's worth of procedures, substantially more than England (-66.7%). It would take until 2031 to eliminate this deficit with an immediate expansion of capacity over 2019 levels by 10%.

Conclusion

The arthroplasty deficit following the COVID-19 pandemic is now equivalent to over two-thirds of a year of normal operating activity, and continues to increase. Patients awaiting different types of arthroplasty, in each country, have been affected disproportionately. A rapid and significant expansion in services is required to address the deficit, and will still take many years to rectify.

Day-case hip and knee arthroplasty: stages of care and the development of an institutional pathway

Day-case, or outpatient, arthroplasty is growing and has been adopted in healthcare systems because of its cost-effectiveness. A number of studies that reported on day-case total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have shown that they can be performed successfully in a select group of patients. However, safety remains a concern, as a clear pathway, including discharge criteria, is not well described in the literature. This article outlines the stages of care involved in day-case hip and knee arthroplasty and gives insights from University College London Hospital's own evidence-based day-case arthroplasty pathway.

Identifying Preoperative Predictors for 24-Hour Discharge After Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

Introduction The resumption of elective medical services post-pandemic has brought to the forefront the importance of outpatient arthroplasty services in promoting efficiency and mitigating hospital-acquired infections. This study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict the success of outpatient lower limb arthroplasty surgeries. Methods Our investigation involved a retrospective review of 606 patients who underwent elective hip and knee arthroplasty. We documented variables such as the hospital length of stay, patient demographics (age and gender), Oxford Joint Scores, body mass index, socioeconomic status, American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status classification, comorbid conditions, the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI), preoperative blood test results, implant types, scheduling details of the surgery, and rates of readmission within 30 days post-surgery. A two-step analysis using univariate and multivariate regression models was performed to pinpoint preoperative indicators that could predict same-day discharge following arthroplasty. Results Forty-five patients (7.4%) were discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Early discharge did not correlate with higher rates of readmission within 30 days (p>0.05). Neither weekend nor afternoon surgeries significantly extended the length of stay beyond 24 hours (p>0.05). No significant differences in the prevalence of comorbidities, FCI scores, socioeconomic status, or preoperative blood test results were found when comparing patients discharged within 24 hours to those who stayed longer. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients younger than 65 years (relative risk (RR) 2.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-5.74) and those receiving partial knee arthroplasty (RR 8.91; 95% CI 3.05-26.04) were more likely to be discharged within 24 hours. Conclusions Outpatient arthroplasty is a viable option, especially for individuals younger than 65 years undergoing partial knee arthroplasty, independent of other patient-related factors, comorbidities, and specifics of the hospital episode.

Perceived barriers and facilitators of day-case surgery for major foot and ankle procedures? A cross-sectional survey of United Kingdom surgeons

BACKGROUND

Advances in minimally invasive surgery and improved post-operative pain management make it possible to consider performing even major foot/ankle operations as day-case. This could have significant benefits for patients and the health service. However there are theoretical concerns about post-operative complications and patient satisfaction due to pain.

AIM

To scope the current practice of foot and ankle surgeons on day-case surgery for major foot and ankle procedures in the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

An online survey (19 questions) was sent to UK foot and ankle surgeons via the British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society membership list in August 2021. Major foot and ankle procedures were defined as surgery that is usually performed as an inpatient in majority of centres and day-case as same day discharge, with day surgery as the intended treatment pathway.

RESULTS

132 people responded to the survey invitation with 80% working in Acute NHS Trusts. Currently 45% of respondents perform less than 100 day-case surgeries per year for these procedures. 78% felt that there was scope to perform more procedures as day-case at their centre. Post-operative pain (34%) and patient satisfaction (10%) was not highly measured within their centres. Lack of adequate physiotherapy input pre/post-operatively (23%) and lack of out of hours support (21%) were the top perceived barriers to performing more major foot and ankle procedures as day-case.

CONCLUSION

There is consensus among UK surgeons to do more major foot/ankle procedures as day-case. Out of hours support and physiotherapy input pre/ post-op were perceived as the main barriers. Despite theoretical concerns about post-operative pain and satisfaction this was only measured by a third of those surveyed. There is a need for nationally agreed protocols to optimise the delivery of and measurement of outcomes in this type of surgery. At a local level, the provision of physiotherapy and out of hours support should be explored at sites where this is a perceived barrier.

The effect of BMI and other factors on post-operative length of stay: A multivariable regression analysis of 860 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is a trend towards minimising length of stay (LOS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as greater LOS is associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs. Patient factors known to influence LOS post-TKA include age and ASA grade. Evidence regarding the effect of body mass index (BMI) in particular is conflicting, with some studies finding that increased BMI predicts increased LOS, while others have found no relationship. Few previous studies, which have mostly been conducted outside the UK, have examined the effect of living alone or socioeconomic deprivation, which may be confounders.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1031 consecutive primary TKAs performed between 1 April 2021 and 31 December 2021 in a single high-volume arthroplasty centre. A multivariable negative binomial regression model was performed for the 860 patients with complete data, using pre-operative (BMI, age, gender, ASA grade, smoking, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, living arrangement, EQ5D quality of life score, and indication for surgery) and peri-operative variables (surgeon, surgical approach, tourniquet use, a.m./p.m operation, operation side, duration, and day of the week).

RESULTS

Mean LOS was 2.6 days. BMI and socioeconomic deprivation had no effect on LOS (P > 0.05). Increased LOS was associated with living alone, lower EQ5D, age and ASA grade (all P < 0.001), p.m. operation (P < 0.01), female gender and duration of surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BMI and socioeconomic status were not correlated with LOS after TKA. Living alone, which has not been previously reported and lower pre-operative EQ5D status were significant risk factors, which merit consideration in pre-operative planning and counselling.

Total hip replacement performed via a direct anterior approach: A comparison of the lateral and supine position

Background

The direct anterior approach (DA) is a recognised approach for performing a total hip replacement (THR). Proponents cite improved recovery times, lower pain levels and improved patient satisfaction in the early post operative period. The procedure can be performed in the supine or lateral position. We wanted to compare the direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus (LD) position and supine (SU) position.

Methods

Single site, non-randomised, multiple surgeon retrospective cohort study between 2014 and 2021 to compare outcomes, complications and implant position for patients undergoing DAA THR in the SU or LD position.

Results

A total of 39 patients (22 lateral/17 supine) were identified. Patients had an average follow up of 45 months (17-81). 95% of the cohort were ASA 1 or 2. The majority of cases were uncemented (95%). A greater implant selection was used in the lateral group and the supine group used mainly implants associated with the supine table. No significant differences were found in post operative oxford hip scores, haemoglobin, length of stay, operative time, cup inclination, offset or post operative leg length. There were no recorded intra-operative complications in the LA group and two in the SU group - one calcar fracture and one canal perforation. No patient in either group has undergone a revision procedure.

Conclusion

Both the supine and lateral position have resulted in satisfactory patient and radiological outcomes. We identified a higher rate of intra-operative fracture in the supine group which is comparable with existing literature. Given the similar outcomes between both groups we would suggest that surgeons wishing to consider the DAA may consider performing this in the lateral position as this will be more familiar to them, they will be able to use their existing implants and do not need a specialised operating table.

The Efficacy of Bone Wax in Reduction of Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Perioperative blood management in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become a prime focus of research. Given the morbidity, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospital stay associated with postoperative anemia, various measures have been proposed to reduce perioperative blood loss (PBL). In this trial, we studied the efficacy of bone wax application on the distal cut surface of the femoral neck in reducing PBL during THA through the direct anterior approach.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 152 patients underwent THA through the direct anterior approach with use of bone wax (n = 75) or without bone wax (control) (n = 77). The study was triple-blinded. The primary outcomes were apparent PBL (blood in sponges and suction canister) and total PBL on postoperative days (PODs) 3 and 5 (as calculated with the Good and Nadler methods). Transfusion and complications were the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, etiology, preoperative hematologic/coagulation profile, anesthesia, intraoperative mean arterial pressure, or operative time. Apparent PBL, total PBL on POD3, and total PBL, in milliliters, on POD5 were significantly lower in the wax group, with median values of 200 (interquartile range [IQR]: 115 to 310) versus 370 (IQR: 195 to 513.7), 505.2 (IQR: 409.2 to 637.6) versus 747 (IQR: 494.6 to 955.4), and 536.7 (IQR: 430.9 to 689.3) versus 767.8 (IQR: 537.8 to 1,021.9) in the wax and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences in the rates of transfusion and complications were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone wax on the cut surface of femoral neck can significantly reduce PBL during THA through the direct anterior approach. Bone wax is accessible and inexpensive and can be considered a routine part of the surgical technique in THA through the direct anterior approach. This intervention has no impact on complication or transfusion rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No Effect of Surgical Approach on Discharge Outcomes in Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: The interest in ambulatory total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased recently due to a national focus on value-based care and improved rapid recovery protocols. Purpose: We sought to determine if surgical approach had an effect on discharge outcomes in outpatient THA. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining patients who underwent unilateral THA at a single institution using a standardized perioperative care pathway who were discharged home within 24 hours. In total, we compared 106 patients who underwent THA using the direct anterior approach (ATHA) and 90 patients who underwent THA using the posterior approach (PTHA). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare time to ambulation, length of surgery, readmissions, and 90-day complications. Results:Time to ambulation in the ATHA and PTHA groups was 3.9 hours and 4.1 hours, respectively, and time to discharge was 5.9 hours and 6.0 hours, respectively. Length of surgery was shorter in the ATHA group than in the PTHA group (78 minutes vs 86 minutes, respectively). Complications occurred in 3 patients (3%) in the ATHA group vs 4 patients (4%) in PTHA group. In both groups, early ambulation (within 5 hours) predicted earlier time to discharge. Surgical approach was not associated with time to ambulation or time to discharge on multivariable analysis. Conclusion: In this retrospective study, outpatient THA was feasible in a well-selected population of patients undergoing anterior or posterior approaches. Further study is warranted.

Same-day discharge after early mobilisation and increased frequency of physiotherapy following hip and knee arthroplasty

Background

Advanced rehabilitation pathway (ARP) after hip and knee arthroplasties is popular globally and is gaining ground in South Africa (SA). A multidisciplinary team in Rustenburg, SA, has implemented an ARP with the first same-day discharge (SDD) from hospital. The lack of evidence of physiotherapy protocols within an ARP determined our study.

Objectives

Determine and compare hospital length of stay (LOS) (hours), patient satisfaction (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)), patient safety (30-day re-admission) and cost between the two cohorts.

Method

A quantitative prospective patient (treatment) group receiving early mobilisation with increased frequency of physiotherapy on post-operative day zero (POD0) was compared to a conservatively managed retrospective historical (control) group following post-operative elective hip and knee arthroplasties.

Results

Results for the prospective group which were significantly improved relative to the retrospective group included decreased LOS (median 7.650, p < 0.001), less pain at 6 weeks (mean 16.20, standard deviation [SD] = 2.673, p < 0.001), less stiffness (mean 5.82, SD = 1.214, p = 0.007), higher function (mean 54.87, SD = 8.544, p < 0.001), lower hospital cost (mean R43 340, p < 0.001) and physiotherapy cost (mean R1069, p < 0.001), and total costs compared to the retrospective group (mean R117 062, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Safe and cost-effective SDD is possible in an ARP with earlier mobilisation and increased frequency of physiotherapy on POD0.

Clinical implications

Achieving safe SDD after hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries saved costs and improved patient satisfaction, with a decrease in LOS being beneficial for medical funders and stakeholders including government aiming to implement National Health Insurance (NHI) in the future.

Length of Hospital Stay after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Correlation Study on 1200 Patients

In countries with a high average population age, total knee arthroplasty is still carried out in an inpatient setting. The roadmap to performing major surgery on an outpatient basis passes through the understanding of those perioperative features that correlate with higher lengths of hospital stay (LOS). A retrospective database of 1200 patients was reviewed for retrieving preoperative and perioperative factors including anthropometric and demographic data, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory assessment, and surgical time. Considering the LOS as a discrete series, data were analyzed by means of logistic regression with multiple univariate and multivariate models. The results showed a median length of hospital stay of 3 (IQR 3, 4) days. According to multiple univariate analysis, arterial hypertension (p = 0.008), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.028), CCI score (p < 0.001), ASA score (p = 0.006), surgical time (p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the duration of hospital stay in days. Moreover, preoperative hemoglobin value was inversely correlated to the LOS (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation between LOS and surgical time and intraoperative blood loss. Many factors influence the permanence of the inpatient and acting on those variables, by stabilizing comorbidities and optimizing laboratory values, may reduce the overall healthcare burden.

Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on safety and efficacy of hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, clinical pathways (CPs) for hip and knee arthroplasty have been strongly and continuously evolved based on scientific evidence and innovation.

AIM

The present systematic review, including meta-analysis, aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) with regular pathways for patients with hip and/or knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A literature search in healthcare databases (Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science) was conducted from inception up to June 2018. Relevant randomized controlled trials as well as observational studies comparing ERP, based on novel evidence, with regular or standard pathways, prescribing care as usual for hip and/or knee arthroplasty, were included. The effect of both CPs was assessed for (serious) adverse events [(S)AEs], readmission rate, length of hospital stay (LoS), clinician-derived clinical outcomes, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and financial benefits. If possible, a meta-analysis was performed. In case of considerable heterogeneity among studies, a qualitative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Forty studies were eligible for data extraction, 34 in meta-analysis and 40 in qualitative analysis. The total sample size consisted of more than 2 million patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, with a mean age of 66 years and with 60% of females. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from average to good. The ERP had lower (S)AEs [relative risk (RR): 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1] and readmission rates (RR: 0.8, 95%CI: 0.7-1), and reduced LoS [median days 6.5 (0.3-9.5)], and showed similar or improved outcomes for functional recovery and PROMs compared to regular pathways. The analyses for readmission presented a statistically significant difference in the enhanced recovery pathway in favor of knee arthroplasties (P = 0.01). ERP were reported to be cost effective, and the cost reduction varied largely between studies (€109 and $20573). The overall outcomes of all studies reported using Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation, presented moderate or high quality of evidence.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that implementation of ERP resulted in improved clinical and patient related outcomes compared to regular pathways in hip and knee arthroplasty, with a potential reduction of costs.

Blood loss and transfusion rates following total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis

This study aimed to identify factors that inde- pendently predict increased rates of transfusion following total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing THA surgery over 12 months was performed. Electronic operative records were analysed to determine the following patient factors: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, indication for surgery, surgical technique, type of implant used, haematological markers, hospital length of stay (LOS) and complications. A total of 244 patients were included. There were 141 females (58%) and 103 males (42%). The median age was 65±12. The median pre-operative blood volume was 4500mls (IQR; 4000-5200). The median blood loss was 1069mls (IQR; 775-1390). The total number of patients requiring transfusion was 28 (11%), with a median of two units being transfused. Pre-operative haemoglobin (p<0.001) level, haematocrit (p<0.001) level and weight (p=0.016) were found to be predictive of transfusion requirement as well as ASA grade (p=0.005). Application of an intra-operative surgical drain was associated with higher rates of transfusion (p<0.001). Our study strengthens the evidence that pre-operative haemoglobin and haematocrit levels are valuable predictors of patients requiring transfusion. Additionally, ASA grade may be viewed as a helpful factor in predicting risk of transfusion. A strategy incorporating pre-operative optimisation of modifiable factors may reduce rates of transfusion requirement.

The patient perspective, experience and satisfaction of day case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A short-term mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Day case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is increasingly being performed worldwide. When performed in the appropriate patient, day case UKA has been demonstrated to be safe, cost effective and improve resource allocation. Limited evidence highlights increased patient satisfaction of day case UKA when compared with inpatient UKA. A detailed study of the patient perspective, experience and satisfaction following day case UKA has not been described before.

METHODS

A retrospective case series review of 21 consecutive patients (19 unilateral, 2 bilateral) undergoing day case UKA in an elective orthopaedic centre was undertaken. A qualitative and quantitative patient assessment of the day case UKA experience was administered. A five-point Likert scale satisfaction questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and open-ended interview was undertaken. The qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred percent of patients expressed satisfaction (76.2% completely satisfied, 33.8% moderately satisfied) with day case UKA. The majority of patients (90.5%) reported that if they had to undergo UKA again they would prefer a day case over an inpatient procedure. Patients consider surgical outcome, physiotherapy provision, discharge planning, postoperative medications and follow up as key aspects of day case UKA care. One patient was re-admitted following discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates a high level of patient satisfaction with day case UKA. The results reported herein are subject to the study limitations of sample size, recall bias and inclusion criteria. We recommend that the themes identified by patients are addressed through a multidisciplinary approach with well-defined clinical pathways for a high-quality patient-centred experience.

Introducing a day-case arthroplasty pathway significantly reduces overall length of stay

Aims

Day-case arthroplasty is gaining popularity in Europe. We report outcomes from the first 12 months following implementation of a day-case pathway for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an NHS hospital.

Methods

A total of 47 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 24 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients were selected for the day-case arthroplasty pathway, based on preoperative fitness and agreement to participate. Data were likewise collected for a matched control group (n = 58) who followed the standard pathway three months prior to the implementation of the day-case pathway. We report same-day discharge (SDD) success, reasons for delayed discharge, and patient-reported outcomes. Overall length of stay (LOS) for all lower limb arthroplasty was recorded to determine the wider impact of implementing a day-case pathway.

Results

Patients on the day-case pathway achieved SDD in 47% (22/47) of THAs and 67% (16/24) of UKAs. The most common reasons for failed SDD were nausea, hypotension, and pain, which were strongly associated with the use of fentanyl in the spinal anaesthetic. Complications and patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Following the introduction of the day-case pathway, the mean LOS reduced significantly by 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5 days respectively in THA, UKA, and total knee arthroplasty cases (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Day-case pathways are feasible in an NHS set-up with only small changes required. We do not recommend fentanyl in the spinal anaesthetic for day-case patients. An important benefit seen in our unit is the so-called ‘day-case effect’, with a significant reduction in mean LOS seen across all lower limb arthroplasty.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):900–908.

Physiotherapy in an advanced rehabilitation pathway for patients after hip and knee arthroplasty: A proposal

Background

Accelerated rehabilitation pathway (ARP) decrease patients’ hospital length of stay (LOS). A lack of evidence exists on physiotherapy management and outcome as part of ARP in South Africa (SA). Our study will aim to determine whether early mobilisation and increased frequency of physiotherapy treatments for participants after hip or knee arthroplasty surgery on post-operative day 0 (POD 0) affect outcome.

Methods/design

A quantitative prospective cohort study incorporating ARP on (n = 60) non-randomised elective hip and knee arthroplasty participants will be compared with a more conservatively managed historical control group (n = 60). The physiotherapy protocol includes early mobilisation and exercises 1–3 h post-operatively on POD 0 and a second mobilisation and exercise session, 1–2 h later. Outcomes measures are as follows: hours for LOS, the WOMAC measured pre-operatively, 6 weeks and 3 months post-operatively, 30-day readmission for safety and cost comparison between the prospective and historical cohorts. Descriptive statistics will be undertaken. A paired t-test will be used to analyse each of the outcome measures across the time periods if data are normally distributed. Length of stay, WOMAC score and cost data will be compared between the groups, using a Mann–Whitney U test. The occurrence of adverse events will be compared between the groups using Pearson’s chi-square tests. The confidence interval will be set at 95% and p = 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Discussion

Globally, ARP’s are successfully implemented to manage patients presenting with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Research investigating physiotherapy protocols in an ARP is lacking in the literature.

Conclusion

Achieving the same-day discharge after hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries may help elective surgery backlogs and waiting lists in a more cost-effective manner.

Clinical implications

The same day discharge after arthroplasty may be a cost-effective management option in the future.

Protocol identification

Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, PACTR202103637993156.

Day case unicompartmental knee replacement: An update of the Torbay experience

BACKGROUND

Hospitals throughout the United Kingdom face significant challenges in regards to inpatient bed capacity, leading to growing interest in day case arthroplasty. Day case Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has been offered within our unit since 2010, with successive evaluations of pathway outcomes performed in 2011 and 2015. Since then, our day case UKR pathway has expanded. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction with this expanded pathway.

METHODS

Data was prospectively collected for all patients undergoing a UKR between January 2017 and August 2019. Data collected included the pathway planned, date of admission, date of discharge and re-admissions to hospital within 30 days of surgery. Patient satisfaction was evaluated via a follow-up questionnaire.

RESULTS

109 patients underwent a UKR between January 2017 and August 2019. 83 patients (76%) were planned through the day case pathway. 63 patients were successfully discharged on the day of surgery. One day case pathway and two inpatient pathway patients were re-admitted within 30 days of surgery with medical conditions. A high level of patient satisfaction with our day case pathway was identified.

CONCLUSION

UKR with planned discharge on the day of surgery is possible for a large proportion of patients provided that robust pathway and protocol design is undertaken. Following 10 years' experience, our day case UKR pathway has increasingly become the default for the majority of our patients. We report high patient satisfaction and low 30-day re-admission rates. However, 100% success rate for day of surgery discharge remains challenging.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the length of stay following total hip and knee arthroplasty in a high volume elective orthopaedic unit

Aims

Elective orthopaedic services have had to adapt to significant system-wide pressures since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019. Length of stay is often recognized as a key marker of quality of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Expeditious discharge is key in establishing early rehabilitation and in reducing infection risk, both procedure-related and from COVID-19. The primary aim was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty at a high-volume, elective orthopaedic centre.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients undergoing primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty over a six-month period, from 1 July to 31 December 2020, were compared to the same period in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, wait to surgery, COVID-19 status, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results

A total of 1,311 patients underwent hip or knee arthroplasty in the six-month period following recommencement of elective services in 2020 compared to 1,527 patients the year before. Waiting time to surgery increased in post-COVID-19 group (137 days vs 78; p < 0.001). Length of stay also significantly increased (0.49 days; p < 0.001) despite no difference in age or ASA grade. There were no cases of postoperative COVID-19 infection.

Conclusion

Time to surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly higher following recommencement of elective orthopaedic services in the latter part of 2020 in comparison to a similar patient cohort from the year before. Longer waiting times may have contributed to the clinical and radiological deterioration of arthritis and general musculoskeletal conditioning, which may in turn have affected immediate postoperative rehabilitation and mobilization, as well as increasing hospital stay.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):655–660.

Day-case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a literature review and development of a novel hospital pathway

INTRODUCTION

We have seen unparalleled changes in our healthcare systems globally as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As we strive to regenerate our full capacity elective services in order to contest the increasing demand for lower limb arthroplasty, this pandemic has allowed us a rare opportunity to revise and develop novel elective arthroplasty pathways intended to improve patient care and advance healthcare efficiency. We present an extensive evidence-based review of the approaches used to achieve day-case unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) as well as the development of a day-case UKA care pathway in a UK NHS institution based on the evidence provided in the literature.

METHODS

An extensive search of the literature was performed for articles that reported on readmission or complication rates ≥30 days postoperatively following day-case UKA.

FINDINGS

Fifteen manuscripts reporting the results of day-case UKA, defined as discharged on the same calendar day of surgery, were included in our review. Mean reported complication rates for day-case and inpatient UKA within the follow-up periods were 4.05% and 6.52%, respectively. Mean readmission rates were 2.71% and 4.36% for day-case and inpatient UKA, respectively. The mean rate of successful same-day discharge was 92.45%.

CONCLUSION

We introduce our institutional Elective Day Surgery Arthroplasty Pathway (EDSAP) founded upon the evidence presented in the literature. Stringent patient selection complimented by a well-defined day-case arthroplasty pathway is fundamental for successful commencement of day-case UKA in the NHS.

Day-case open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip

Aims

Open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is regularly performed despite screening programmes, due to failure of treatment or late presentation. A protocol for open reduction of DDH has been refined through collaboration between surgical, anaesthetic, and nursing teams to allow same day discharge. The objective of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of performing open reduction of DDH as a day case.

Methods

A prospectively collected departmental database was visited. All consecutive surgical cases of DDH between June 2015 and March 2020 were collected. Closed reductions, bilateral cases, cases requiring corrective osteotomy, and children with comorbidities were excluded. Data collected included demographics, safety outcome measures (blood loss, complications, readmission, reduction confirmation), and feasibility for discharge according to the Face Legs Activity Cry Consolidability (FLACC) pain scale. A satisfaction questionnaire was filled by the carers. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results

Out of 168 consecutive DDH cases, 16 patients fit the inclusion criteria (age range 10 to 26 months, 13 female). Intraoperative blood loss ranged from "minimal" to 120 ml, and there were no complications or readmissions. The FLACC score was 0 for all patients. The carers satisfaction questionnaire expressed high satisfaction from the experience with adequate information and support provided.

Conclusion

Open reduction in DDH, without corrective osteotomy, is safe and feasible to be managed as a day case procedure. It requires a clear treatment pathway, analgesia, sufficient counselling, and communication with carers. It is even more important during the COVID-19 pandemic when reduced length of hospital stay is likely to be safer for both patient and their parents.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2021;2(4):271–277.

The safety and efficacy of day-case total joint arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The popularity of day-case arthroplasty has been fuelled by focus on its cost effectiveness for the healthcare system. Safety concerns still remain. The aim of this review was to compare readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty for patients undergoing day-case surgery and for inpatients.

METHODS

A comprehensive online search of databases was performed for all published articles in the English language evaluating readmission rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Seventeen studies were deemed eligible and included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

All studies included in the meta-analysis described readmission rates following THA/TKA. The readmission rate for day-case patients was 1.9% (n=124) whereas for inpatients, it was 2.0% (n=12,399). Compared with inpatient arthroplasty, day-case arthroplasty was associated with lower total readmission rates (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.94, p=0.01). Furthermore, day-case surgery conferred a decrease in readmission rates for both THA (1.3% vs 7.0%) and TKA (2.7% vs 4.3%). Moreover, day-case THA and TKA were both associated with a decreased chance of readmission (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17-0.42, p<0.00001; and OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42-0.72, p<0.00001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasises that with a thoughtful, designated protocol and with careful patient selection, day-case arthroplasty is a safe and effective option.

Estimation of blood volume and blood loss in primary total hip and knee replacement: An analysis of formulae for perioperative calculations and their ability to predict length of stay and blood transfusion requirements

Introduction

Blood loss continues to be a common surgical risk in total hip (THR) and knee replacements (TKR). Accurate prediction of blood loss permits appropriate counselling of risks to patients, target optimisation and forecasting future transfusion requirements. We compared blood volume formulae of Moore and Nadler, and blood loss formulae of Liu, Mercuriali, Bourke, Ward, Gross, Lisander and Meunier, to assess associations between calculated values with length of stay and transfusion requirements and determine which are useful in contemporary practice.

Methods

We retrospectively studied patients undergoing primary THR and TKR. We collected data on patient demographics, surgical interventions, pre- and postoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit values, length of stay and blood transfusion requirements. Spearman correlation tests and least squares multiple linear regression were performed.

Results

149 THRs and 90 TKRs in 239 patients were analysed over four months. There was a very strong correlation between blood volume formulae. There were multiple very strong and strong associations between blood loss formulae. Bourke correlated significantly to length of stay, and Liu, Mercuriali, Lisander and Meunier correlated for incidence of transfusion.

Conclusion

Accurate estimation of perioperative blood loss is increasingly important as demand for joint replacement surgery increases in an ageing population. If the primary interest is the association of blood loss and length of stay, Bourke's formula should be preferred. If the primary interest is calculating risk of transfusion, the formulae of Liu or Meunier should be preferred. The formulae of Mercuriali and Lisander are becoming redundant in contemporary practice.

Perioperative Systemic Dexamethasone Reduces Length of Stay in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The objective of this review is to examine the effect of perioperative systemic corticosteroids at varying doses and timings on early postoperative recovery outcomes following unilateral total knee and total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 1, 2020. Studies comparing the outcome of adult patients receiving a systemic steroid to patients who did not receive steroids were included.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included, incorporating 1957 patients. Perioperative corticosteroids reduced hospital LOS (mean difference [MD] = -0.39 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.61 to -0.18). A subsequent dose of corticosteroid at 24 hours further reduced LOS (MD = -0.33, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.11). Corticosteroids resulted in reduced levels of pain on postoperative day (POD) 0 (MD = -1.99, 95% CI -3.30 to -0.69), POD1 (MD = -1.47, 95% CI -2.15 to -0.79), and POD2. Higher doses were more effective in reducing pain with activity on POD0 (P = .006) and 1 (P = .023). Steroids reduced the incidence of PONV on POD1 (log odds ratio [OR] = -1.05, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.84) and POD2, with greater effect at higher doses (P = .046). Corticosteroids did not increase the incidence of infection (P = 1.000), venous thromboembolism (P = 1.000), or gastrointestinal hemorrhage (P = 1.000) but were associated with an increase in blood glucose (MD = 5.30 mg/dL, 95% CI 2.69-7.90).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative corticosteroids are safe, facilitate earlier discharge, and improve patient recovery following unilateral total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Higher doses (15-20 mg of dexamethasone) are associated with further reductions in dynamic pain and PONV, and repeat dosing may further reduce LOS.

Day-case total hip arthroplasty: a literature review and development of a hospital pathway

Aims

We present the development of a day-case total hip arthroplasty (THA) pathway in a UK National Health Service institution in conjunction with an extensive evidence-based summary of the interventions used to achieve successful day-case THA to which the protocol is founded upon.

Methods

We performed a prospective audit of day-case THA in our institution as we reinitiate our full capacity elective services. In parallel, we performed a review of the literature reporting complication or readmission rates at ≥ 30-day postoperative following day-case THA. Electronic searches were performed using four databases from the date of inception to November 2020. Relevant studies were identified, data extracted, and qualitative synthesis performed.

Results

Our evaluation and critique of the evidence-based literature identifies day-case THA to be safe, effective, and economical, benefiting both patients and healthcare systems alike. We further validate this with our institutional elective day surgery arthroplasty pathway (EDSAP) and report a small cohort of successful day-case THA cases as an example in the early stages of this practice in our unit.

Conclusion

Careful patient selection and education, adequate perioperative considerations, including multimodal analgesia, surgical technique and blood loss management protocols and appropriate postoperative pathways comprising reliable discharge criteria are essential for successful day-case THA.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):93–102.

Resection of the coccyx as an outpatient procedure

We wished to determine if coccygectomy as an outpatient procedure is a safe alternative to inpatient treatment. 68 patients were treated at our institution with coccygectomy as an outpatient procedure during a seven-year period. Out of these 61 (90%) responded to final follow-up questionnaires after a minimum of one year. We recorded satisfaction with the outpatient modality, and compared postoperative complications and long-term satisfaction with patients who had been operated as inpatients during the same period. Out of the 61 patients who responded to final follow up, 39 (64%) were satisfied with having the operation as an outpatient procedure. The patients who would have preferred overnight hospitalization generally felt that traveling home the same day was painful. There was significantly less pain on the journey home if the procedure had been performed under spinal anaesthesia. In terms of complications, there were 10% reoperations due to deep infection in the outpatient group, and 12% superficial wound infections treated with oral antibiotics. The corresponding numbers for the in-patient group were 8% and 14%. The long-term success rate was similar for both groups. 87% of outpatients and 89% of inpatients reported that they would have consented to the operation if they had known the result in advance. Coccygectomy as an outpatient procedure gives similar results to inpatient treatment and can be regarded as an acceptable alternative. Spinal anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain on the journey home.

Preoperative iron treatment in anaemic patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased risks of postoperative complications, blood transfusion and mortality. This meta-analysis aims to review the best available evidence on the clinical effectiveness of preoperative iron in anaemic patients undergoing elective total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).

DESIGN

Electronic databases and handsearching were used to identify randomised and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI) reporting perioperative blood transfusion rates for anaemic participants receiving iron before elective THR or TKR. Searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and other databases were conducted on 17 April 2019 and updated on 15 July 2020. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility and evaluated risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale for NRSIs. Data extraction was performed by ABS and checked by AB. Meta-analysis used the Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effects models.

RESULTS

807 records were identified: 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 10 were eligible for meta-analyses (one RCT and nine NRSIs). Five of the NRSIs were of high-quality while there were some concerns of bias in the RCT. Meta-analysis of 10 studies (n=2178 participants) showed a 39% reduction in risk of receiving a perioperative blood transfusion with iron compared with no iron (risk ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.73, p<0.001, I²=0%). There was a significant reduction in the number of red blood cell units transfused with iron compared with no iron (mean difference -0.37units, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.27, p<0.001, I²=40%); six studies (n=1496). Length of stay was significantly reduced with iron, by an average of 2.08 days (95% CI -2.64 to -1.51, p<0.001, I²=40%); five studies (n=1140).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative iron in anaemic, elective THR or TKR patients, significantly reduces the number of patients and number of units transfused and length of stay. However, high-quality, randomised trials are lacking.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019129035.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ambulatory Surgery Centers: The New Reality!

By streamlining surgical care and eliminating postoperative hospitalization, the transition to ambulatory total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has the potential to improve efficiency and minimize the costs of care. However, practical, legal, and financial implications remain to be addressed. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has also yet to address concerns generated by the removal of TKA from the Inpatient-Only List and provide guidance on patient selection. Rolling out regulatory changes that impact high-volume procedures, such as TKA, in a short period of time and without appropriate feedback can only lead to further confusion. As surgeons, we are in a unique business model that requires us to constantly innovate to deliver high quality care, while also taking financial cuts as a result of our innovations.

Day case vs inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Day case total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a novel approach, not widely practiced in Europe. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients comparing elective day case and inpatient TSAs in our United Kingdom centre.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of day case TSA compared to standard inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

All patients undergoing TSA between January 2017 and July 2018 were included. Outcome measures were: Change in abduction and extension 3 mo postoperatively; 30-d postoperative adverse events and re-admissions in day case and inpatient groups. We also conducted an economic evaluation of outpatient arthroplasty. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to adjust for demographic and operative covariates.

RESULTS

Fifty nine patients were included, 18 d cases and 41 inpatients. There were no adverse events or re-admissions at 30 d postoperatively in either group. There were no significant differences in adjusted flexion (mean difference 16.4, 95%CI: 17.6-50.5, P = 0.337) or abduction (mean difference: 13.2, 95%CI: 18.4-44.9, P = 0.405) postoperatively between groups. Median savings with outpatient arthroplasty were £529 (interquartile range: 247.33-789, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Day case TSA is a safe, effective procedure, with significant cost benefit. Wider use may be warranted in the United Kingdom and beyond, with potential for significant cost savings and improved efficiency.

Achieving discharge within 24 h of robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty may be possible with appropriate patient selection and a multi-disciplinary team approach

Aims

There has been significant interest in day-case and rapid discharge pathways for unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR). Robotic-assisted surgery has the potential to improve surgical accuracy in UKR. However, to date there are no published studies reporting results of rapid-discharge pathways in patients receiving UKR using the NAVIO ^◊ robotic system.

Methods

A retrospective analysis identified 19 patients who were safely discharged within 24 h following UKR using the NAVIO ^◊ robotic system between June 2017 and October 2019. All patients went through a standardised UKR pathway protocol. Pre-operatively patients underwent education sessions and anaesthetic assessment, with selected patients undergoing occupational/physiotherapy assessment prior to surgery. All patients received a general anaesthetic with local anaesthetic infiltration prior to closure; nerve blocks were not used routinely. A multi-modal analgesic regime was utilised. Patients were discharged home once they were safe to mobilise on ward, had normal vital signs and pain was adequately controlled. Patients were discharged with outpatient physiotherapy referral and consultant follow up at 6 weeks.

Results

All patients were discharged within 24 h; there were no post-operative complications and no readmissions to hospital. The mean length of stay was 19.5 h (SD = 6.8), with patients seen twice on average by physiotherapy post-operatively. Active range of motion at 6 weeks was 105.8°, with all patients mobilising independently. The median 6-month post-operative Oxford Knee Score was 44 out of 48.

Conclusion

This initial feasibility study suggests that patients may be safely discharged within 24 h of UKR using the NAVIO robotic system. Appropriate patient selection will ensure successful discharge. Further prospective studies are needed.

Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications

Introduction

Patients undergoing TKA or THA have traditionally been managed post-operatively as inpatients. However, with current surgical techniques and pain management, there is evidence that outpatient joint arthroplasty can be safely performed in selected patient. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the post-operative complication rates of outpatient and inpatient TJA with subgroup analysis of TKA and THA.

Methods

Electronic searches were performed using five databases from their date of inception to October 2018. Relevant studies were identified, with data extracted and meta-analyzed from the studies.

Results

From seven included studies, 176,179 patients were inpatient TJA and 1613 were outpatient TJA. The outpatient and inpatient TJA cohorts had similar mean age and BMI, with a greater proportion of females in the inpatient group. For TJA we found no significant difference in total complications (P = 0.06), major complications (P = 0.59), readmissions (P = 0.60), DVT (P = 0.94), UTI (P = 0.50), pneumonia (P = 0.42) and wound complications (P = 0.50) between the outpatient and inpatient groups. However, there were fewer transfusions (P = 0.05) but increased reoperations (P = 0.02) in the outpatient TJA group. Subgroup analysis of TKA (P = 0.25) and THA (P = 0.39) also found no significant differences in total complications between the outpatient and inpatient groups.

Conclusion

Outpatient TJA had comparable total complication rates to inpatient TJA. Along with that outpatient TJA can significantly reduce costs to healthcare systems but careful pre-operative patient selection is required to optimize outcomes. More quality randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to add to this body of evidence.

Does Dexamethasone Reduce Hospital Readiness for Discharge, Pain, Nausea, and Early Patient Satisfaction in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Reduction in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty may facilitate earlier discharge from hospital and reduce healthcare costs. This study was performed to primarily assess whether perioperative dexamethasone reduced hospital length of stay and to assess the effect on pain, nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either 8 mg intravenous dexamethasone (n = 86) or placebo (n = 78) at induction and at 24 hours postsurgery. The primary outcome was length of stay and secondary outcomes were pain and nausea visual analog scale scores, analgesic and antiemetic usage, blood glucose level, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Participants in the study group achieved earlier readiness for discharge. There was a 20% reduction in pain scores and morphine usage was 27% lower in the study group. Nausea scores were similar in the 2 groups but there was lower antiemetic usage in the study group. Satisfaction scores at 6 weeks postsurgery in the dexamethasone group were significantly higher than the placebo group. There was no difference in complication rates between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The administration of intravenous dexamethasone could lead to earlier readiness for discharge especially in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty, primarily by a reduction in postoperative pain scores and/or morphine requirements.