Vascular surgery by numbers

Assessment of failure to rescue after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted data set

OBJECTIVE

Open aortic repair (OAR) is associated with higher risk of mortality compared with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to compare failure to rescue (FTR) after major predischarge complications in patients undergoing OAR and EVAR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent OAR or EVAR in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2011 and 2015 were selected. Patients with ruptured aneurysm and those with type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms were excluded. The primary outcome was FTR, defined as 30-day mortality in patients who developed at least one complication during their hospital stay. Univariable and multivariable statistics were used.

RESULTS

A total of 9097 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Of those, 3291 (36.2%) had at least one major predischarge complication, 82.5% after OAR (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.9%-84.1%) vs 21.3% after EVAR (95% CI, 20.4%-22.3%; P < .001). Increased FTR was seen after aneurysm rupture, cardiac arrest, septic shock, and acute kidney injury. On multivariable analysis, FTR was not significantly different between OAR and EVAR (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61-1.24; P = .44). Propensity score matching and coarsened exact matching showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although EVAR has fewer complications and lower in-hospital mortality than OAR, FTR after major predischarge complications does not depend on the type of surgical approach. When an in-hospital major complication occurs after EVAR, surgeons should be alert that FTR risk resulting in mortality is similar to that of OAR. Therefore, there is no safety net with EVAR.

Professionalism Redundant, Reshaped, or Reinvigorated? Realizing the "Third Logic" in Contemporary Health Care

Recent decades have seen the influence of the professions decline. Lately, commentators have suggested a revived role for a "new" professionalism in ensuring and enhancing high-quality health care in systems dominated by market and managerial logics. The form this new professionalism might take, however, remains obscure. This article uses data from an ethnographic study of three English health care improvement projects to analyze the place, potential, and limitations of professionalism as a means of engaging clinicians in efforts to improve service quality. We found that appeals to notions of professionalism had strong support among practitioners, but converting enthusiasm for the principle of professionalism into motivation to change practice was not straightforward. Some tactics used in pursuit of this deviated sharply from traditional models of collegial social control. In systems characterized by fissures between professional groups and powerful market and managerial influences, we suggest that professionalism must interact creatively but carefully with other logics.

Failure-to-rescue and interprovider comparisons after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

The use of postoperative complication rates to derive metrics such as failure-to-rescue (FTR) is of increasing interest in assessing the quality of care. The aim of this study was to quantify FTR rates for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in England using administrative data, and to examine its validity against case-note review.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data was combined with a multicentre audit of data quality. All elective AAA repairs done in England between 2005 and 2010 were identified. Postoperative complications were extracted, FTR rates quantified, and differences in FTR and in-hospital death rates established. A multicentre case-note review was performed to establish the accuracy of coding of complications, and the impact of inaccuracies on FTR rates derived from HES data.

RESULTS

A total of 19 638 elective AAA repairs were identified from HES; the overall mortality rate was 4·6 per cent. Patients with complications (19·2 per cent) were more likely to die than those without complications (odds ratio 12·22, 95 per cent c.i. 10·51 to 14·21; P < 0·001) and had longer hospital stays (P < 0·001). FTR rates correlated strongly with death rates, whereas complication rates did not. On case-note review (661 procedures), 41·5 per cent of patients had a complication recorded in the case notes. There was evidence of systematic under-reporting of complications in HES, leading to an overall misclassification rate of 36·3 (95 per cent c.i. 33·7 to 39·2) per cent (P < 0·001), which was less pronounced for surgical complications (12·6 (11·1 to 13·9) per cent; P <0·001). Despite this, the majority of FTR rates derived from HES were not significantly different from those derived from case-note data.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complication and FTR rates after elective AAA repair can be derived from HES data. However, use of the metric for interprovider comparisons should be done cautiously, and only with concurrent case-note validation given the degree of miscoding identified.

Determination of patient preference for location of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

OBJECTIVE

Aneurysm repair is centralized in higher volume centers resulting in reduced mortality, with longer travel distances. The purpose of this study is to explore patients' preference between local care versus longer distances and lower mortality rates.

METHODS

Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) measuring 4 to 5 cm and living at least a 1-hour drive from our hospital were asked to assume it had grown to 5.5 cm, and repair was recommended with a mortality risk of 2%. The level of additional risk they would accept to undergo surgery locally was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were surveyed. If mortality risk was equivalent at the local and regional hospitals, 44% preferred care at our tertiary center, while 56% preferred surgery locally. If perioperative mortality was increased at the local hospital, 9% preferred local surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients with AAA will accept longer travel distances for care as long as it results in a reduction in perioperative mortality.