An innovative and cost-effective way of managing ankle fractures prior to surgery--home therapy

Comparison of Differences in Surgical Complications Between Fellowship-Trained Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons and All Other Orthopedic Surgeons Using the ABOS Database

During the past decade, US orthopedic residency graduates have become increasingly subspecialized presumably for decreased patient complications; however, no study has examined this clinical utility for foot and ankle (F&A) surgeries among different fellowship subspecialties. Data from American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery 1999 to 2016 Part II Board Certification Examinations were used to assess patients treated by F&A fellowship-trained, trauma fellowship-trained, and all other fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons performing ankle fracture repair. Adverse events were compared by surgical complexity and fellowship status. Factors independently associated with surgical complications were identified using a binary multivariate logistic regression. A total of 45,031 F&A cases met inclusion criteria. From 1999 to 2016, the percentage of F&A procedures performed by F&A fellowship surgeons steadily increased. Surgical complications were significantly different between fellowship trainings (F&A, 7.23%; trauma, 6.65%; and other, 7.84%). This difference became more pronounced with more complicated fracture pattern. On multivariate regression, F&A fellowship training was associated with significantly decreased likelihood of surgeon-reported complications (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92; P<.001), as was trauma fellowship training (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99; P=.035). Despite presumed increased complexity of cases treated by F&A fellowship-trained surgeons, these patients had significantly decreased risk of surgeon-reported surgical complications, thus highlighting the value of F&A fellowship training. In the absence of vital patient comorbidity data in the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database, further research must examine specific patient comorbidities and case acuity and their influence on treatments and surgical complications between fellowship-trained and other orthopedic surgeons to further illuminate the value of subspecialty training. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):e237-e243.].

Association of Delayed Surgery for Ankle Fractures and Patient-Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Several studies probe the association between prolonged time to surgery and postoperative complications in ankle fractures, but little is known about how a longer wait time affects clinical outcomes. The present study aims to assess the association between time from injury to surgery and patient-reported outcomes after operative treatment of severe ankle fractures.

METHOD

Patients treated operatively for low-energy ankle fractures that also involve the posterior malleolus from 2014 to 2016 were included. Patient charts were reviewed for patient demographics, type of trauma, fracture characteristics, treatment given, and complications. Ankle function was evaluated on a follow-up visit by clinical examination, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures (Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score [SEFAS], RAND-36, visual analog scale [VAS] of Pain, VAS of Satisfaction). We compared patients treated within 1 week to those treated later than a week from injury for analyses.

RESULTS

Follow-up visits of 130 patients were performed at mean 26 (SD 9) months after surgery. Patient demographics and fracture characteristics were similar between groups. Mean SEFAS was 34 (SD 10) in patients treated later than a week from injury vs 38 (SD 9) in those treated earlier (P = .012). Patients operated on later than 7 days from injury reported more pain (P = .008) and lower satisfaction than those treated earlier (P = .016).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective patient series of low-energy ankle fractures with posterior malleolar fragments, we found that waiting >7 days for definitive surgery was associated with poorer clinical outcomes and more pain compared with those who had surgery earlier.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The Influence of Obesity on Hospital Admission After Outpatient Foot and Ankle Surgery

We examined the association of body mass index (BMI) with sociodemographic data, medical comorbidities and hospital admission following ambulatory foot and ankle surgery. We conducted an analysis utilizing data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2007 to 2016. Adult patients who underwent ankle surgery defined as ankle arthrodesis, ankle open reduction and internal fixation, and Achilles tendon repair in the outpatient setting. We examined 6 BMI ranges: <20 kg/m² underweight, ≥20 to <25 kg/m² normal weight, ≥25 to <30 kg/m² overweight, ≥30 to <40 kg/m² obese, ≥40 kg/m²to <50 kg/m² severely obese, and ≥50 kg/m² extremely obese. The primary outcome was hospital admission. We performed multivariable logistic regression and reported odds ratios (OR) and their associated 95% confidence interval (CI) and considered a p value of <.05 as statistically significant. Data extraction yielded 13,454 adult patients who underwent ambulatory ankle surgery. We then performed listwise deletion to exclude cases with missing observations. After excluding 5.4% of the data, the final study population included 12,729 patients. The overall rate of hospital admission was in the population was 18.6% (2,377/12,729). The overall rate of postoperative complications was 0.03% (4/12,729). We found no significant association of BMI with hospital admission following multivariable logistic regression. We recommend that BMI alone should not be solely used to exclude patients from having ankle surgery performed in an outpatient setting, especially since this patient group makes up a significant proportion of orthopedic surgery.

Improving the efficiency of ankle fracture care through home care and day-surgery units: Delivering safe surgery on a value-based healthcare model

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative home care for suitable patients with ankle fractures is becoming an increasingly common practice. It allows adequate time for reduction of ankle swelling following a decision to undertake operative fixation has been made. We aim to assess the safety, efficiency, cost-effectiveness and differences in clinical & patient outcomes of day surgery unit (DSU) care for ankle fracture treatment in selected patients. Our study combined home therapy treatment with DSU care for suitable ankle fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Trauma Centre.

PATIENTS

Fifty-three patients requiring operative fixation for an ankle fracture were divided into 2 groups. Patients in group 1 entered the home care combined with DSU treatment pathway whilst in group 2 were treated as in patient in the main trauma theatre in our standard pathway.

INTERVENTION

Comparison of Home Care & Day Case Surgery vs. in patient admission for patients requiring operative ankle fractures fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prospective data collection was undertaken over a 2-year period, on fracture type, logistical outcomes including time to surgery and total length of stay in the hospital and clinical outcomes including the rate of post-operative complications, incidence of unplanned surgical revisions and objective patient satisfaction. Economic analysis was performed to compare the marginal cost saving per case for group 1 vs. group 2.

RESULTS

There were 21 patients in group 1. They waited for on average 5.8 days at home for their operation and none were admitted pre or post operatively. There were no associated complications and the majority of patients were discharged from follow-up at 6 weeks post-surgery. In-group 2, there were 32 patients. They waited on average 2.4 days for their operation in the hospital and had an average length of stay of 4.9 days. One patient in group 2 suffered from a deep vein thrombosis. The benefit from our chargeable tariff for group 1 patients was £2295 per case while the margin for group 2 patients was £277 per case. The financial benefit to the health care provider was £2018 in favour of home care and DSU treatment, with high service satisfaction and low complication rates.

DISCUSSION

This study provides focused evidence supporting the use of home care for the management of ankle fractures. The DSU pathway improves the value in healthcare delivery with high patient satisfaction scores when compared to the traditional pathway. Our model demonstrates predictably good clinical outcomes with a financial cost benefit over in-patient admission care model for selected patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Independent Risk Factors for Impaired Early Outcome after Isolated Ankle Fracture - A Multivariate Analysis and Prognostic Models

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are common operative indications in orthopedic surgery. Their incidence is increasing.

OBJECTIVES

To identify independent risk factors and to develop prognostic models for the prediction of prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) and the onset of postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study analyzing data of 154 consecutive, isolated, surgically treated ankle fractures. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was applied to identify significant independent risk factors. The validity and clinical applicability of the developed prognostic models was assessed with ROC-curve analysis (ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic). Internal validation of prognostic models was performed with randomized backwards bootstrapping.

RESULTS

The median LOS was 7 days. 50 patients (33%) had a longer LOS. 13% of operated patients had a postoperative complication (n = 20). Independent preoperative risk factors for prolonged length of stay were leukocytosis (p = 0.020; OR: 1.211), an increased CRP-level (p = 0.005; OR: 1.901), as well as a bi- (p = 0.002; OR: 15.197) or trimalleolar (p = 0.001; OR: 10.678) fracture type. Immediate operative therapy was an independent beneficial factor (p < 0.001; OR: 0.070). The onset of complications was associated significantly with diabetes mellitus (p = 0.004; OR: 9.903) and an elevated ASA score (p = 0,004; OR: 3.574). The developed prognostic models for the prediction of prolonged LOS (AUROC: 0.736) and postoperative complications (AUROC: 0.724) had a good clinical validity and were internally validated.

CONCLUSION

The current data pronounce the importance of preoperative laboratory works. Furthermore, co-morbidities play a major role in the prognosis of outcome. The developed prognostic models are able to reliably predict the outcome and enable the preoperative identification of high-risk patients.

Outpatient surgery in patients with ankle fractures minimises hospital admissions and utilisation of healthcare resources

Purpose

The recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has emphasised the need to minimise hospital admissions and utilisation of healthcare resources. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of an outpatient surgery protocol for acute closed ankle fractures.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 262 patients underwent outpatient surgery for their closed ankle fractures at our level-1 trauma centre. A total of 196 patients met our inclusion criteria and were ultimately included in the final analysis. Our primary outcomes’ measures included post-operative admission to the emergency department within 30 days after surgery and unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after surgery. Our secondary outcome measure included the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) within 12 weeks after surgery.

Results

Thirty-two patients (16.3%) had an unplanned emergency department visit within 30 days of fracture fixation and two patients (1.0%) required hospital readmission within 30 days of their surgery. Sixteen patients (8.2%) developed SSI, which included 11 (5.6%) superficial and five (2.6%) deep infections.

Conclusion

Strategic outpatient management of acute closed ankle fractures is associated with acceptable rates of unplanned emergency department visits, hospital readmissions, and SSIs. In the context of the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, outpatient management of these injuries may aide in the mitigation of nosocomial infections and the preservation of finite healthcare resources.

Profile of practitioners, and factors influencing home care physiotherapy model of practice in Nigeria

The present study investigated factors that influenced home care physiotherapy (HCP) services and profile of the practitioners in Nigeria. It also investigated if the service was registered with the Regulatory Agency. Three hundred and thirty conveniently sampled physiotherapists in Nigeria participated in the cross-sectional survey. A newly developed, nine-part, content-validated questionnaire was used to obtain information about the demographics, sources of referral, case types, frequency of treatment, costing, benefits, and challenges of the HCP, job satisfaction, and registration status. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. All the respondents (100%) were involved in HCP irrespective of their professional profile. The mean duration of practice experience was 9.09 ± 7.34 years. Stroke (41.8%) was the most prevalent case treated. Poor working environment (M = 4.16, R = 1-5), transportation cost (M = 4.16, R = 1-5) and intrusion by impostors (M = 3.66, R = 1-5), were some of the factors that had impact on the HCP services. A preponderance of HCP services was not registered with the Regulatory Agency in Nigeria.

Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital

Introduction

Patients suffering ankle fractures provide a common economic and time burden to modern healthcare in the UK. They continue to be admitted to await operative intervention and may have to wait days before an operation occurs. Unnecessary bed stay is one are that may be subject to cost savings if the safety of the patient is maintained.

Patient and methods

We prospectively collected data on 23 patients over a four-month period identifying their admission status, length of stay, and time to operative intervention. We were able to cost analyse the patients journey from admission to discharge, postoperative intervention. We then instilled the Ankle Home Stay Programme, identifying patients safe to be discharged who were able to re-attend for their operation. Seventeen patients were enrolled in this and a subsequent cost-analysis was compared to the pre-intervention cohort.

Results

Pre Ankle Home Stay Programme demonstrated cost per patient of admitted patients to be £2690 and £1347 for patients managed in the outpatient setting. Implementation of the pathway maintained this cost saving with those in the outpatient setting costing £1781 per patient and those admitted costing £2855.

Conclusions

Patients can be safely managed in the outpatient setting, with regular clinic review before formal operative intervention as opposed to blanket admission to an acute inpatient bed. This is cost saving in a healthcare system with finite resources focussed on improving use of economic resources. It also maintains patient care with select admission criteria onto the pathway and regular review to ensure standards are maintained.

•

Patients can be safely managed in the outpatient setting.

•

Expedited home discharge with limited risk to acquiring hospital borne conditions.

•

Cost efficiency savings for inpatient stay.

Timing of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

Background. Unstable ankle fractures are treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to prevent posttraumatic arthritis. Typically, ORIF is performed as an ambulatory surgery several days to a few weeks after injury. It is unclear what effect this delay may have on functional outcome. This study aimed to assess the effect of timing of ankle ORIF on wound complications and functional outcome. Methods. A retrospective review of 121 patients who underwent ankle ORIF was performed. A total of 58 patients had a follow-up of at least 24 months. Time between injury and surgery greater than 14 days was defined as "delayed." Demographic variables, injury characteristics, length of surgery, and postoperative stay were documented. Comparison of demographic variables, wound complications, and functional outcome determined by Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) was performed. Results. 118 patients were included. The duration between injury and surgery was 6 days in the "early" group and 19 days in the "delayed" group. There were no significant differences in demographic variables, injury characteristics, and length of surgery between the groups. Wound complications in the early and delayed groups were 5% and 11.8%, although this difference was not statistically significant. Among 58 patients who had a follow-up of at least 24 months, the median follow-up time was 38 (range, 24-76) months. Each subscale of FAOS demonstrated no significant difference. Conclusion. Ankle ORIF more than 14 days after injury did not significantly increase the rate of wound complication, nor did it impair ultimate functional outcome in this group. Levels of Evidence: Level III.

Effect on Hospital Length of Stay of Tourniquet Use During Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: Randomized Controlled Trial

Approximately 50% of ankle fractures require internal fixation. A tourniquet is often used to create a bloodless operative field, but its effect on hospital length of stay (LOS) is unclear. This article reports a parallel-group observer-blinded randomized trial of the effect of tourniquet use on LOS. One hundred eighty-eight adult patients requiring internal fixation of ankle fracture were randomized to surgery with or without a tourniquet. LOS was analyzed on intention-to-treat principles using Poisson regression. As a secondary outcome, duration of operation was analyzed by analysis of covariance. Mean LOS was 1.79 ± 1.50 days in the tourniquet group and 1.65 ± 1.11 days in the no-tourniquet group. The covariate-adjusted rate ratio for LOS (reference group: no tourniquet) was 1.084 (95% confidence interval 0.871, 1.348; p = .470). Sensitivity analyses (unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis and as-treated analysis) gave similar nonsignificant results. The covariate-adjusted mean difference in duration of operation was 3.03 minutes (95% confidence interval -4.96, 11.02; p = .455), favoring the tourniquet group; sensitivity analyses again gave similar results. Adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, the use of a tourniquet during internal fixation does not significantly influence hospital LOS, of which preinjury medical condition of the patient appears to be the most important determinant.

Incidence and root causes of delays in emergency orthopaedic procedures: a single-centre experience of 36,017 consecutive cases over seven years

Background

Emergency surgery is unplanned by definition and patients are scheduled for surgery with minimal preparation. Some patients who have sustained emergency orthopaedic trauma or other conditions must be operated on immediately or within a few hours, while others can wait until the hospital’s resources permit and/or the patients’ health status has been optimised as needed. This may affect the prioritisation procedures for both emergency and elective surgery and might result in waiting lists, not only for planned procedures but also for emergencies.

Method

The main purpose of this retrospective, observational, single-centre study was to evaluate and describe for the number and reasons of delays, as well as waiting times in emergency orthopaedic surgery using data derived from the hospital’s records and registers. All the emergency patients scheduled for emergency surgery whose procedures were rescheduled and delayed between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2013 were studied.

Result

We found that 24% (8474) of the 36,017 patients scheduled for emergency surgeries were delayed and rescheduled at least once, some several times. Eighty per cent of these delays were due to organisational causes. Twenty-one per cent of all the delayed patients had surgery within 24 h, whilst 41% waited for more than 24 h, up to 3 days.

Conclusion

A large number of the clinic’s emergency orthopaedic procedures were rescheduled and delayed and the majority of the delays were related to organisational reasons. The results can be interpreted in two ways; first, organisational reasons are avoidable and the potential for improvement is great and, secondly and most importantly, the delays might negatively affect patient outcomes.

Economic Burden of Inpatient Admission of Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are among the most prevalent traumatic orthopaedic injuries. A large proportion of patients sustaining operative ankle fractures are admitted directly from the emergency department prior to operative management. In the authors' experience, however, many closed ankle injuries may be safely and effectively managed on an outpatient basis. The aim of this study was to characterize the economic impact of routine inpatient admission of ankle fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all outpatient ankle fracture surgery performed by a single foot and ankle fellowship-trained surgeon at a tertiary level academic center in 2012 was conducted to identify any patients requiring postoperative inpatient admission. The National Inpatient Sample was queried for operative management of lateral malleolus, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar ankle fractures in 2012 with regard to national estimates of total volume and length of stay by age. The maximum allowable Medicare inpatient facility reimbursements for diagnosis related group 494 and Medicare outpatient facility reimbursements for Current Procedural Terminology codes 27792, 27814, and 27822 were obtained from the Medicare Acute Inpatient Prospective Pricer and the Medicare Outpatient Pricer Code, respectively. Private facility reimbursement rates were estimated at 139% of inpatient Medicare reimbursement and 280% of outpatient reimbursement, as described in the literature. Surgeon and anesthesiologist fees were considered similar between both inpatient and outpatient groups. A unique stochastic decision-tree model was derived from probabilities and associated costs and evaluated using modified Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS

Of 76 lateral malleolar, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation cases performed in 2012 by the senior author, 9 patients required admission for polytrauma, medical comorbidities, or age. All 67 outpatients were discharged home the day of surgery. In the 2012 national cohort analyzed, 48,044 estimated inpatient admissions occurred postoperatively for closed ankle fractures. The median length of stay was 3 days for each admission and was associated with an estimated facility reimbursement ranging from $12,920 for Medicare reimbursement of lateral malleolus fractures to $18,613 for private reimbursement of trimalleolar fractures. Outpatient facility reimbursements per case were estimated at $4,125 for Medicare patients and $11,459 for private insurance patients. Nationally, annual inpatient admissions accounted for $796,033,050 in reimbursements, while outpatient surgery would have been associated with $419,327,612 for treatment of these same ankle fractures.

CONCLUSION

In the authors' experience, closed lateral malleolus, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar fractures were safely and effectively treated on an outpatient basis. Routine perioperative admission of patients sustaining ankle fractures likely results in more than $367 million of excess facility reimbursements annually in the United States. Even if a 25% necessary admission rate were assumed, routine inpatient admission of ankle fractures would result in a $282 million excess economic burden annually in the United States. Although in certain cases, inpatient admission may be necessary, with value-based decision making becoming increasingly the responsibility of the orthopaedic surgeon, understanding the implications of inpatient stays for ankle fracture surgery can ultimately result in cost savings to the US health care system and patients individually.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

Early versus late surgery for closed ankle fractures

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome after early versus late surgery for closed ankle fractures in terms of the length of hospital stay and infection rate.

METHODS

Records of 95 men and 119 women aged 14 to 92 (mean, 46) years who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for ankle fractures during three 6-month periods in 2004, 2007, and 2010 were reviewed. 82 and 132 patients underwent surgery <24 hours and >24 hours after presentation, respectively. The most common reason for delayed surgery was unavailability of the operation theatre, followed by delayed admission to the fracture clinic and excess soft tissue swelling.

RESULTS

Patient and injury characteristics of the 3 study periods were comparable (p=0.399). The early and late surgery groups were comparable in proportions of various fracture patterns but not in patient age (40 vs. 49 years, p=0.002). The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was shorter in the early surgery group (2.9 vs. 5.5 days, p=0.009). The 2 groups did not differ significantly in the infection rate (7% vs. 11%, p=0.589) or the need for additional surgery (3.7% vs. 5.3%, p=0.63).

CONCLUSION

Patients with delayed surgery for ankle fracture had a longer postoperative length of hospital stay. Surgery should be performed within 24 hours of injury to minimise the length of hospital stay.

The impact of the Major Trauma Network: will trauma units continue to treat complex foot and ankle injuries?

INTRODUCTION

April 1st 2012 saw the introduction of National Trauma Networks in England. The aim to optimise the management of major trauma. Patients with an ISS≥16 would be transferred to the regional Major Trauma Centre (level 1). Our premise was that trauma units (level 2) would no longer manage complex foot and ankle injuries thereby obviating the need for a foot and ankle specialist service.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries, using the Gloucestershire trauma database, from a trauma unit with a population of 750,000. Rates of open fractures, complex foot and ankle injuries and requirement for stabilisation with external fixation were reviewed before and after the introduction of the regional Trauma Network. Secondly, using the Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) database, all foot and ankle injuries triaged to the regional Major Trauma Centre (MTC) were reviewed.

RESULTS

Incidence of open foot and ankle injuries was 2.9 per 100,000 per year. There were 5.1% open injuries before the network and 3.2% after (p>0.05). Frequency of complex foot and ankle injuries was 4.2% before and 7.5% after the network commenced, showing no significant change. There was no statistically significant change in the numbers of patients with complex foot and ankle injuries treated by application of external fixators. Analysis of TARN data revealed that only 18% of patients with foot and ankle injuries taken to the MTC had an ISS≥16. The majority of these patients were identified as requiring plastic surgical intervention for open fractures (69%) or were polytrauma patients (43%). Only 4.5% of patients had isolated, closed foot and ankle injuries.

CONCLUSION

We found that at the trauma unit there was no decrease in the numbers of complex foot and ankle injuries, open fractures, or the applications of external fixators, following the introduction of the Trauma Network. These patients will continue to attend trauma units as they usually have an ISS<16. Our findings suggest that there is still a need for foot and ankle specialists at trauma units, in order to manage patients with complex foot and ankle injuries.

Competing in value-based health care: keys to winning the foot race

The US health care system is transitioning to a value-based model of health care in which providers will be rewarded for delivering services that achieve excellent clinical outcomes with efficient cost utilization. The concept of "value" in health care (defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent) is rapidly spreading as physicians and health systems brace for the paradigm shift from "fee-for-volume" to "fee-for-value" reimbursement. What constitutes good value versus poor value in health care remains nebulous at this time. Various specialties across medicine and within orthopaedics are seeking to better demonstrate value delivered to patients, payers, and policy makers. The objective of this article is to develop a framework for defining and measuring value in foot and ankle surgery. In this new era of health care, we believe that a working knowledge of value and its determinants will be imperative for foot and ankle surgeons to unify research and quality improvement efforts so as to demonstrate the value of services rendered within the subspecialty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.

Home therapy pathway - safe and streamlined method of initial management of ankle fractures

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures requiring operative fixation often swell up after 24h and surgery during this period is not feasible as there are several associated risks including infection and wound breakdown. The affected limb is kept elevated usually in hospital and once the swelling has sufficiently subsided then the operation takes place. We conducted a study looking at the impact of a home therapy ankle pathway on the length of stay and safety of patients with ankle fractures requiring surgical fixation.

METHODS

The length of stay of a control group was studied from December 2009 to March 2010. The home therapy ankle pathway was then introduced in August 2010. If patients could not have their operation within 24h then they were placed in a Plaster of Paris back slab in casualty with the ankle reduced, limb care advice given - elevation, cooling and DVT thromboprophylaxis - and the patient was discharged home on crutches after a slot was determined on the trauma list typically six days later. The patient was also given an emergency contact number in case an untoward event occurred, and they were called at least once during their home stay by hospital staff to ensure all was well. Patients who were unsafe to be discharged on home therapy were admitted. This cohort of patients was studied between August 2010 and December 2011 RESULTS: In the control group, 49 ankle fractures required operative intervention. The mean pre-operative length of stay was 2.88 days and the mean post op length of stay was 5 days. Between August 2010 and December 2011, after implementation of the pathway, 176 ankle fractures requiring operative treatment presented to the orthopaedic department. Of these, 105 were eligible for home therapy on the ankle pathway prior to surgery. The average pre-operative length of stay on the pathway was 0.17 days. The average post op length of stay was 1.72 days (P<0.001 in all modalities). Home therapy was carried out for an average of 6.63 days. Challenges of home therapy included persistent swelling and blistering (11), loss of reduction (4), poor pain management whilst at home (4) and cancellation due to lack of availability of a theatre slot (6).

CONCLUSION

With patients in whom it is indicated, the home therapy ankle pathway has proved to be a safe and resource sparing method of managing ankle fractures prior to surgery.

The challenge of obtaining information necessary for multi-criteria decision analysis implementation: the case of physiotherapy services in Canada

BACKGROUND

As fiscal constraints dominate health policy discussions across Canada and globally, priority-setting exercises are becoming more common to guide the difficult choices that must be made. In this context, it becomes highly desirable to have accurate estimates of the value of specific health care interventions.Economic evaluation is a well-accepted method to estimate the value of health care interventions. However, economic evaluation has significant limitations, which have lead to an increase in the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). One key concern with MCDA is the availability of the information necessary for implementation. In the Fall 2011, the Canadian Physiotherapy Association embarked on a project aimed at providing a valuation of physiotherapy services that is both evidence-based and relevant to resource allocation decisions. The framework selected for this project was MCDA. We report on how we addressed the challenge of obtaining some of the information necessary for MCDA implementation.

METHODS

MCDA criteria were selected and areas of physiotherapy practices were identified. The building up of the necessary information base was a three step process. First, there was a literature review for each practice area, on each criterion. The next step was to conduct interviews with experts in each of the practice areas to critique the results of the literature review and to fill in gaps where there was no or insufficient literature. Finally, the results of the individual interviews were validated by a national committee to ensure consistency across all practice areas and that a national level perspective is applied.

RESULTS

Despite a lack of research evidence on many of the considerations relevant to the estimation of the value of physiotherapy services (the criteria), sufficient information was obtained to facilitate MCDA implementation at the local level.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this research project serve two purposes: 1) a method to obtain information necessary to implement MCDA is described, and 2) the results in terms of information on the benefits provided by each of the twelve areas of physiotherapy practice can be used by decision-makers as a starting point in the implementation of MCDA at the local level.

Role of patient information handouts following operative treatment of ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Widespread evidence exists for directed patient information interventions (eg, pamphlets) in the setting of several orthopaedic conditions and interventions. Up until now, no study had assessed the role of these interventions in the management of patients following ankle fractures.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2007, 40 patients who suffered an operative ankle fracture were randomized to either a standard treatment group for an ankle fracture or an enhanced information group who received an American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons ankle fracture information pamphlet that explained postoperative routine at our institution and a physiotherapy handout depicting a standard protocol. Study participants were followed for 3 months clinically and radiographically. At the 6-week and 3-month intervals, study participants completed the Olerud-Molander Questionnaire and 2 questions regarding their level of satisfaction. The primary outcome measure was the Likert-scale-based survey question determining the level of satisfaction with the treating staff.

RESULTS

Participants in the enhanced information group were more satisfied with treatment at 3 months (9.2 vs 6.3; P < .001). There were significant improvements in work/activity ability at 6 weeks (P = .01), but this advantage disappeared at 3 months (P = .24). No differences in postoperative complication rates were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Information enhancement in the form of pamphlets can be helpful in providing patients with accessible information in the postoperative period. While they do not seem to have a sustained impact on postoperative outcomes, handouts may enhance the interaction between staff and patient at postoperative visits, improving patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, appropriately powered randomized prospective cohort study.