Medication-induced headache: overview and systematic review of therapeutic approaches

Medication-Overuse Headache

OBJECTIVE

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) has been described for almost 100 years and is characterized as a daily or near-daily headache that usually presents in patients with preexisting primary headache disorders who are overusing one or more acute or symptomatic headache medications. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of patients with MOH.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for MOH have changed over time. The worldwide prevalence appears to be between 1% and 2%. Together, headache disorders, including MOH, are currently ranked as the second leading cause of years lived with disability in the Global Burden of Disease world health survey. Significant neurophysiologic changes are seen in the brains of patients with MOH, including functional alterations in central pain processing and modulating systems and central sensitization. Research supports updates to the principles of management, including weaning off the overused medication, preventive therapy, biobehavioral therapy, and patient education.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

MOH is a fairly common and treatable secondary headache disorder that produces significant disability and a substantial reduction in quality of life. The costs related to lost income and disability are substantial. MOH is intimately related to chronic migraine, which continues to be underrecognized and undertreated. Treatment focuses on both the institution of effective preventive migraine therapy and the reduction or removal of the overused medications. Educational efforts directed toward both providers and patients have been shown to be effective in reducing the effect of MOH.

Migraine Management in Community Pharmacies: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Patterns of Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia

In Saudi Arabia, community pharmacies offer healthcare services for different conditions. However, clarity of the competence of pharmacists in managing migraines is lacking. This study aimed to explore the current knowledge, attitude, and practice patterns of community pharmacists concerning migraine management in the northwestern part of Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study was carried out between June and September 2022 among 215 Saudi community pharmacists. Data analysis was performed by descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS version 27. Most community pharmacists (87.9%) feel that migraine management is essential to their practice, and 83.3% suggest between one and five over-the-counter (OTC) migraine products daily. Among the study pharmacists, 83.7% feel migraine patients should try OTC before prescription medications. Only 9.3% of the community pharmacists do not believe that migraine is a neurological disorder. The medications most prescribed for migraine were triptans, representing 52.1% of prescriptions. There were significant differences between the gender of the pharmacists and their knowledge, attitude, and practice overall score (p-value = 0.04). Male pharmacists exhibited higher knowledge, attitude, and practice scores than female pharmacists. Although many community pharmacists acknowledge their expertise and involvement in managing migraines, there is a requirement for further education and training to enhance their capacity to offer complete care to migraine patients. Pharmacists should also consider non-pharmacological interventions and complementary therapies when treating migraine symptoms.

An altered reward system characterizes chronic migraine with medication overuse headache

BACKGROUND

Medication overuse headache shares several characteristics with substance use disorders. However, key features of substance use disorders such as increased impulsivity and alterations in reward processing remain little explored in medication overuse headache.

METHODS

Temporal discounting and impulsive decision making behavior and the associated brain mechanisms were assessed in 26 chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache and in 28 healthy controls. Regions-of-interest analyses were first performed for task-related regions, namely the ventral striatum and the ventromedial and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices. Resting-state functional connectivity between these regions were then explored. An additional 27 chronic migraine patients without medication overuse headache were included for comparison in the latter analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with medication overuse headache showed steeper temporal discounting behavior than healthy controls. They also showed weaker subjective value representations in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, when accepting larger delayed rewards, and in ventral striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, when accepting the smaller immediate reward. Resting-state functional connectivity was reduced among the valuation regions when comparing patients with medication overuse headache to the other two control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with medication overuse headache were characterized by altered processing and dysconnectivity in the reward system during intertemporal choices and in the resting-state.

Stability of extemporaneously prepared preservative-free prochlorperazine nasal spray

PURPOSE

The stability of an extemporaneously prepared preservative-free prochlorperazine 5-mg/mL nasal spray was evaluated.

METHODS

The preservative-free prochlorperazine nasal spray was prepared by adding 250 mg of prochlorperazine edisylate to 50 mL of citrate buffer in a low-density polyethylene nasal spray bottle. A stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed and validated using the major degradant prochlorperazine sulfoxide and by performing forced-degradation studies. For chemical stability studies, 3 100-μL samples of the preservative-free prochlorperazine from 5 nasal spray bottles stored at room temperature were collected at days 0, 20, 30, 45, and 60 and were assayed in triplicate using the stability-indicating HPLC method. Microbiological testing involved antimicrobial effectiveness testing based on United States Pharmacopeia (USP) chapter 51 and quantitative microbiological enumeration of aerobic bacteria, yeasts, and mold based on USP chapter 61. Samples for microbiological testing were collected at days 0, 30, and 60.

RESULTS

The stability-indicating HPLC method clearly identified the degradation product prochlorperazine sulfoxide without interference from prochlorperazine. All tested solutions retained over 90% of the initial prochlorperazine concentration for the 60-day study period. There were no detectable changes in color, pH, and viscosity in any sample. There was no growth of bacteria, yeast, and mold for 60 days in all samples tested.

CONCLUSION

An extemporaneously prepared preservative-free nasal spray solution of prochlorperazine edisylate 5 mg/mL was physically, chemically, and microbiologically stable for 60 days when stored at room temperature in low-density polyethylene bottles.

Outcome of Medication Overuse Headache after Abrupt in-Patient withdrawal

One hundred and one patients suffering from chronic daily headache (CDH) and medication overuse were treated, in an in-patient setting, with abrupt discontinuation of the medication overused, intravenous hydrating, and intravenous administration of benzodiazepines and ademetionine. The mean time to CDH resolution was 8.8 days. The in-patient withdrawal protocol used was effective, safe and well tolerated. There was a trend for a shorter time to CDH resolution in patients who overused triptans ( P = 0.062). There was no correlation between time to CDH resolution and either the type of initial primary headache or duration of medication abuse, whereas time to CDH resolution was related to daily drug intake ( P = 0.01). In multiple regression analysis, daily drug intake, age and type of medication overused were independent predictors of time to CDH resolution. At 3-months' follow-up, no patient had relapsed and was again overusing symptomatic medications.

Need for Analgesics/drugs of Abuse: A Comparison Between Headache Patients and Addicts by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ)

Our aim was to compare the need for analgesics/drugs of abuse between headache patients—chronic and episodic headache sufferers—and addicts, by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). This is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. We administered the LDQ questionnaire to 122 chronic daily headache (CDH) sufferers who had been taking one dose of analgesic drug every day for at least 1 year; 71 subjects suffering from episodic headache (EH) using analgesics only occasionally; 115 consecutive drug addicts (DA) with a diagnosis of substance dependence. The mean LDQ total score was similar in the CDH (11.58 ± 6.35) and DA (10.37 ± 6.51) groups, and for both it was significantly higher than the score in the EH (5.61 ± 3.00) group ( P < 0.001). The CDH group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the DA group (Z = −8.18, P < 0.001) in item 8, assessing the primacy of effect over the kind of analgesic used, and in item 10 (Z = −5.03, P < 0.001), asking if it is difficult to live without the analgesic; the DA group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the CDH group, in item 9 (Z = −5.07, P < 0.001) addressing the need for the continued administration of the drug to maintain well-being, and in item 3 (Z =−2.39, P < 0.05), exploring compulsion to start the use of the drug. The EH group had lower scores in all items ( P < 0.05) except for item 9, where there was no difference from CDH group; the EH group had also lower scores ( P < 0.001) than the DA group, except for item 8, where, instead, the score was higher than in the DA group (Z = −5.33, P < 0.001). A strong link develops between chronic headache patients and the analgesics they use. This sort of ‘dependence’ appears to be a consequence of headache, originating from the necessity for the analgesic to cope with everyday life.

Medication Overuse Headache: Clinical Features Predicting Treatment Outcome at 1-Year Follow-Up

We present a prospective study of 240 patients with medication overuse headache (MOH) treated with drug withdrawal and prophylactic medications. At 1-year follow-up, 137 (57.1%) patients were without chronic headache and without medication overuse, eight (3.3%) patients did not improve after withdrawal and 95 (39.6%) relapsed developing recurrent overuse. Age at time of MOH diagnosis, regular use of benzodiazepines, frequency and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score of chronic headache, age at onset of primary headache, frequency and MIDAS score of primary headache, ergotamine compound overuse and daily drug intake were significantly different between successfully and unsuccessfully treated patients. Multivariate analysis determined the frequency of primary headache disorder, ergotamine overuse and disability of chronic headache estimated by MIDAS as independent predictors of treatment efficacy at 1-year follow-up.

Advice Alone Vs. Structured Detoxification Programmes for Medication Overuse Headache: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial in Transformed Migraine Patients With Low Medical Needs

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of strong advice to withdraw the overused medication with the effectiveness of two structured pharmacological detoxification strategies in a cohort of patients diagnosed with probable migraine overuse headache (MOH) plus migraine and presenting low medical needs. One hundred and twenty patients participated in the study. Exclusion criteria included: previous detoxification treatments, coexistent medical or psychiatric illnesses and overuse of agents containing opioids, benzodiazepines and barbiturates. Group A received only intensive advice to withdraw the overused medication. Group B underwent a standard out-patient detoxification programme (advice + prednisone + preventive treatment). Group C underwent a standard inpatient withdrawal programme (as in group B + fluid replacement and antiemetics). Withdrawal therapy was considered successful if, after 2 months, the patient had reverted to an episodic pattern of headache and to an intake of symptomatic medication on fewer than 10 days/month. We were able to detoxify 75.4± of the whole cohort, 77.5± of patients in group A, 71.7± of patients in group B and 76.9± of those in group C ( P > 0.05). In patients with migraine plus MOH and low medical needs, effective drug withdrawal may be obtained through the imparting of advice alone.

Sodium valproate in migraine without aura and medication overuse headache: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of sodium valproate (800mg/die) compared with placebo in medication-overuse headache patients with a history of migraine without aura.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled medication-overuse headache patients for a 3-month treatment period with sodium valproate (800mg/day) or placebo after a 6 day outpatient detoxification regimen, followed by a 3-month follow-up. Primary outcome was defined by the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in the number of days with headache per month (responders) from the baseline to the last 4 weeks of the 3-month treatment. Multivariate logistic regression models were used on the primary endpoint, adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, comorbidity and surgery. The last-observation-carried-forward method was used to adjust for missing values.

RESULTS

Nine sites enrolled 130 patients and, after a 6-day detoxification phase, randomized 88 eligible patients. The 3-month responder rate was higher in the sodium valproate (45.0%) than in the placebo arm (23.8%) with an absolute difference of about 20% (p=0.0431). Sodium valproate had safety and tolerability profiles comparable to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports the efficacy and safety of sodium valproate in the treatment of medication overuse headache with history of migraine after detoxification.

Definitions of medication-overuse headache in population-based studies and their implications on prevalence estimates: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Case definitions of medication-overuse headache (MOH) in population-based research have changed over time. This study aims to review MOH prevalence reports with respect to these changes, and to propose a practical case definition for future studies based on the ICHD-3 beta.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify MOH prevalence studies. Findings were summarized according to diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were included. The commonly used case definition for MOH was headache ≥15 days/month with concurrent medication overuse ≥3 months. There were varying definitions for what was considered as overuse. Studies that all used ICHD-2 criteria showed a wide range of prevalence among adults: 0.5%-7.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

There are limits to comparing prevalence of MOH across studies and over time. The wide range of reported prevalence might not only be due to changing criteria, but also the diversity of countries now publishing data. The criterion "headache occurring on ≥15 days per month" with concurrent medication overuse can be applied in population-based studies. However, the new requirement that a respondent must have "a preexisting headache disorder" has not been previously validated. Exclusion of other headache diagnoses by expert evaluation and ancillary examinations is not feasible in large population-based studies.

Medication overuse headache: history, features, prevention and management strategies

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a daily, or almost daily, headache form that arises from overuse of one or more classes of migraine-abortive or analgesic medication. The main classes of drugs that cause MOH are opioids, butalbital-containing mixed analgesics, triptans, ergotamine tartrate derivatives, simple analgesics (except for plain aspirin), and perhaps non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MOH can be debilitating and results from biochemical and functional brain changes induced by certain medications taken too frequently. At this time, migraine and other primary headache disorders in which migraine or migraine-like elements occur seem exclusively vulnerable to the development of MOH. Other primary headache disorders are not currently believed to be vulnerable. The treatment of MOH consists of discontinuation of the offending drug(s), acute treatment of the withdrawal symptoms and escalating pain, establishing a preventive treatment when necessary, and the implementation of educational and behavioral programs to prevent recidivism. In most patients, MOH can be treated in the outpatient setting but, for the most difficult cases, including those with opioid or butalbital overuse, or in patients with serious medical or behavioral disturbances, effective treatment requires a multidisciplinary, comprehensive headache program, either day-hospital with infusion or an inpatient hospital setting.

High-frequency use of over-the-counter analgesics among adolescents: reflections of an emerging difficult life, a cross-sectional study

AIMS

To examine characteristics of 15- to 16-year-old adolescents who used over-the-counter analgesics daily to weekly (high-frequency users) as compared to those who used less or no analgesics (low-frequency users). Further to analyse the differences in pain experience, lifestyle, self-esteem, school attendance and educational ambition.

METHODS

An anonymous cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. The questionnaire covered the use of over-the-counter analgesics, pain experience, sociodemographics, lifestyle factors, self-esteem, school absence and future educational plans. The study took place in the 10th grade in six junior high schools in a medium-sized town in Norway. The local sales data for analgesics and antipyretics were close to the national average. We invited 626 adolescents to participate. Of the 367 adolescents (59%) who responded, 51% were girls. Associations between the frequency of use of over-the-counter analgesic and the mentioned variables were analysed using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 26% (42 boys and 48 girls) used over-the-counter analgesics daily to weekly. These high-frequency users experienced more widespread pain, slept less, had more paid spare-time work, drank more caffeinated drinks, participated more often in binge drinking, had lower self-esteem, less ambitious educational plans and more frequent school absence than did the low-frequency users. These associations remained significant when controlling for gender, cultural background and self-evaluated economic status.

CONCLUSION

Adolescent, who are high-frequency users of over-the-counter analgesics, suffer more pain and have identifiable characteristics indicative of complex problems. Their ability to handle stress appears to be discordant with the kind of situations to which they are exposed. The wear and tear associated with allostatic mechanisms counteracting stress may heighten their pain experience.

Medication-overuse headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a chronic daily headache in which acute medications used at high frequency cause transformation to headache occurring 15 or more days per month for 4 or more hours per day if left untreated. MOH is a form of US Food and Drug Administration-defined chronic migraine. This review will describe (1) MOH clinical features and diagnosis, (2) pathophysiology and structural and functional MOH brain changes, and (3) prevention and treatment of MOH.

RECENT FINDINGS

MOH causes structural and functional brain changes. Any butalbital or opioid use increases the risk of transforming episodic into chronic migraine (sometimes referred to as chronification). The American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study demonstrated that transformation is most likely to occur with 5 days of butalbital use per month, 8 days of opioid use per month, 10 days of triptan or combination analgesic use per month, and 10 to 15 days of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use per month. Acute migraine treatment should be limited to 2 or fewer days per week, and opioids and butalbital should be avoided.Treatment of MOH consists of combining prophylaxis, 100% wean of overused acute medications, and provision of new acute medications, strictly limiting use to 2 or fewer days per week. Wean can be done slowly in an outpatient setting or it can be done abruptly, sometimes requiring hospitalization with medicine bridges.

SUMMARY

MOH development is linked to baseline frequency of headache days per month, acute medication class ingested, frequency of acute medications ingested, and other risk factors. Using less effective or nonspecific medication for severe migraine results in inadequate treatment response, with redosing and attack prolongation, frequently leading to chronification. Use of any barbiturates or opioids increases the transformation likelihood.Patients with MOH can usually be effectively treated. The first step is 100% wean, followed by establishing preventive medications such as onabotulinumtoxinA or daily prophylaxis and providing acute treatment for severe migraine 2 or fewer days per week. Slow wean or quick termination of rebound medications can be accomplished for most patients on an outpatient basis, but some more difficult problems may need referral for multidisciplinary day hospital or inpatient treatments.

In-patient versus out-patient withdrawal programmes for medication overuse headache: a 2-year randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) management usually includes a medication withdrawal. The choice of withdrawal modalities remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy of in-patient versus out-patient withdrawal programmes in 82 consecutive patients with MOH in an open-label prospective randomized trial. The main outcome measure was the reduction in number of headache days after 2 months and after 2 years. The responders were defined as patients who had reverted to episodic headaches and to an intake of acute treatments for headache less than 10 days per month.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients had a complete drug withdrawal (n = 36 in the out-patient group; n = 35 in the in-patient group). The reduction of headache frequency and subjective improvement did not differ between groups. The long-term responder rate was similar in the out- and in- patient groups (44% and 44%; p = 0.810). The only predictive factor of a bad outcome 2 years after withdrawal was an initial consumption of more than 150 units of acute treatments for headache per month (OR = 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1-9.3; p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Given that we did not observe any difference in efficacy between the in- and out-patient withdrawals, we would recommend out-patient withdrawal in the first instance for patients with uncomplicated MOH.

Patterns of medication use by chronic and episodic headache sufferers in the general population: results from the frequent headache epidemiology study

Though symptomatic medication overuse is believed to play a role in progression from episodic headaches (EH) to chronic daily headaches (CDH), population-based data on this topic are limited. Our objective was to describe patterns of medication use among CDH and EH sufferers in a general population sample. We compared medications used to treat headache in CDH cases and EH controls identified from a large population-based computer-assisted telephone interview survey. CDH began within 5 years of the computer-assisted telephone interview. Questions on medication use focused on treatment prior to the onset of CDH for cases and on an equivalent period in the past for controls. We asked about the likelihood of treating, time waiting to treat, number of different medications used, first, second and third most frequently used headache pain medication, and total treatment days. Questions were also asked about the use of medication for non-headache pain. Current treatment patterns and past treatment patterns were assessed. Likelihood of use of specific medications was compared between CDH cases and EH controls after adjusting for age, sex, primary headache type and number of medications taken to treat pain. Our sample consists of 206 CDH cases and 507 EH controls. CDH subjects were more likely than EH controls to use over-the-counter/caffeine combination products, triptans, opioid compounds and 'other' prescription pain medications. Use of aspirin was protective. After adjustment, aspirin and ibuprofen were (negatively) associated with CDH [OR = 0.5 (0.3-0.9), OR = 0.7 (0.5-1.0)] and opioids remained positively associated with CDH [OR = 2.3 (1.3-3.9)]. For past use, CDH was positively associated with over-the-counter/caffeine combination products and opioid compounds and was negatively associated with use of aspirin. Only ibuprofen remained (negatively) associated with CDH after adjustment [OR = 0.6 (0.4-0.9)]. After adjusting for demographic factors, primary headache type and number of medications taken, CDH sufferers are more likely to use opioid-combination analgesics, and less likely to use aspirin or ibuprofen, than EH sufferers.

Headache in the elderly

Headache in an elderly patient can be a sign of serious, potentially life-threatening disorders. All patients require a full assessment, including a complete neurologic examination. Particular emphasis should be placed on excluding subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, giant cell arteritis, intracranial neoplasm, cerebrovascular accident, acute-angle-closure glaucoma, and infectious etiologies such as meningitis and encephalitis. Once life-threatening disorders are excluded, the geriatrician can focus on more benign etiologies such as migraine, tension headache, and medication withdrawal. Treatment depends on the underlying etiology. This article discusses headaches that require emergent treatment and then describes more benign etiologies of headaches.

Evidence-based understanding of medication-overuse headache: clinical implications

This article discusses the problem of medication-overuse headache from a variety of perspectives, based on the best available evidence. This presentation clarifies the definition of the disorder, distinguishing it from alternative terminology, and describes its epidemiology, natural history, and clinical course. Antimigraine medications are believed to differ in their relative liability to contribute to the development of medication-overuse headache. Patients most at risk of developing medication-overuse headache need to be identified so that appropriate preventive measures can be initiated.

Medication overuse headache in patients with primary headache disorders: epidemiology, management and pathogenesis

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a common medical condition that is associated with considerable long-term morbidity and disability. Patients experiencing MOH have primary headache disorders (migraine, tension-type headache [TTH] or the combination of migraine and TTH) that change to a pattern of daily or near-daily headaches over a period of years or decades following the overuse of symptomatic headache medications. Overused drugs include analgesics, ergot alkaloids, serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists ('triptans') and medications containing barbiturates, codeine, caffeine, tranquillisers and mixed analgesics. Affected patients usually have a long history of primary headache, overuse of medications and MOH before they consult a physician for care. Patients with MOH are usually managed in specialist centres by withdrawal of the overused drugs and treatment of withdrawal symptoms (on an inpatient or outpatient basis), headache prophylaxis and limited use of symptomatic acute medications. Most patients respond to this therapy, although the prognosis is not always good and >or=50% may lapse over an initial 5-year follow-up period. The best practical strategy at present is to prevent the overuse of drugs in the first place by patient education and formal management approaches conducted in primary care to treat the primary headache before it changes to MOH. The quality of the clinical evidence on MOH is suboptimal and further biological and clinical research is urgently required to help facilitate the management of these patients more effectively in the future.

Migraine Therapy: A Survey of Pharmacists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Patterns

OBJECTIVE

Study pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns with regard to migraine therapy.

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists interact with headache sufferers at least 53,000 times daily, thus are well positioned to improve the less than optimal medication management of these disorders. Methods.-Two hundred self-administered surveys, distributed at a migraine symposium, assessing pharmacists' demographic characteristics and level of agreement or disagreement with treatment approaches were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 171 useable surveys (86%) were received. Of the sample, 35% were community pharmacists, 29% were hospital pharmacists, and the remainder were from other work environments. Exclusively among community pharmacists, 80% feel that headache is an important part of their practice, 85% make between one and five over-the-counter (OTC) headache product suggestions per day, and 12% make six or more daily OTC recommendations. Among all the sample's pharmacists, more than half feel migraine patients should try OTC drugs prior to prescription medications, only half ask patients about headache-related morbidity, and one-third feel migraine-specific medications should be reserved only for patients who initially fail nonspecific drugs. Few pharmacists utilize published migraine treatment guidelines. Approximately two-thirds of pharmacists do not feel migraine is a neurobiological illness. The majority is comfortable with their ability to identify people needing a physician referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show pharmacists, particularly those in community pharmacies, interact with headache sufferers multiple times daily. Most pharmacists were neither familiar with nor practice migraine therapies endorsed by evidence-based guidelines. Further training of pharmacists is warranted.

Challenging or difficult headache patients

This article addresses interesting and enigmatic presentations of headache from a diagnostic and treatment perspective. The emphasis is on migraineurs and other headache patients who represent a significant burden for the primary care provider. In particular, the author focuses on undiagnosed migraine, menstrual migraine, migraine in pregnancy, intractable migraine and status migrainosus,transformed migraine, hemiplegic migraine, basilar migraine, "triptan syndrome," sudden onset of severe headache, post-traumatic headache, and headache in elderly patients.

Medication overuse headache

Medication overuse headache may complicate any type of headache and occurs in young people, adults, and even elderly patients. Overuse of acute medications may change intermittent or self-limited headaches into chronic daily headache. Migraineurs seem particularly prone to analgesic rebound headache/ transformed migraine/chronic migraine. Prophylactic therapies are often ineffective in the setting of medication overuse. Recognition of this condition allows appropriate clinical intervention that includes cessation of the offending medications.

Migraine Headache Misconceptions: Barriers to Effective Care

Migraine headaches affect 12% of the adult population in the United States and cause a significant economic loss due to decreased workplace productivity Although interactions between pharmacists and individuals with headache are common, few pharmacists receive adequate training regarding migraine therapy. We refute several misconceptions that hinder effective care, such as that migraine is a vascular disease, triptans cause rampant cardiacrelated morbidity and even mortality, a best oral triptan exists, sinus and tension headaches are prevalent, and migraine is a minor economic problem. Our pathophysiologic understanding demonstrates that migraine is a neurologic process of the trigeminovascular system, of which vascular effects are secondary. This process can result in a myriad of clinical signs and symptoms, often leading to a misdiagnosis of sinus or tension headache. The last decade's experience with triptans in more than half a billion people worldwide reveals a benign adverse-effect profile, particularly when taken early in an attack. Published reports and real-world experiences illustrate that these drugs do not merit fears of triptan-induced cardiac consequences in appropriately selected individuals. Society's productivity loss due to migraine is measured in billions of dollars. Restoring a patient's ability to function normally is now recognized as the primary treatment goal, not merely relieving pain. Thus, the overreliance on "pain killer" drugs such as butalbital-containing products and the continued underutilization of migraine-specific drugs need to be addressed. Opportunities exist for pharmacists and other health care providers to dispel continually propagated migraine misconceptions and familiarize themselves with advances in therapy. Such actions will benefit patients, the health care system, and society as a whole.

Out-patient detoxification in chronic migraine: comparison of strategies

Chronic migraine (CM) patients frequently overuse symptomatic medications (SM). These medications may create a cycle of rebound, worsening of headache and withdrawal symptoms that perpetuate the headache itself. In addition, the overuse of such substances is believed to counteract the efficacy of preventive treatments. We conducted a prospective randomized open-label trial comparing approaches to out-patient management in 150 CM patients (125 women, 25 men; ages 18-80 years, mean 40.3 +/- 13.8) with overuse of SM. In each group, 50 patients received education and orientation and were then abruptly withdrawn from all SM. Immediately following withdrawal, the first group took prednisone (60 mg/ day 2 days, 40 mg/day 2 days and 20 mg/day 2 days) for 6 days, the second group did not have any regular medications to take and the third group took naratriptan (2.5 mg twice a day) during this initial period. All patients had similar profiles of headache characteristics and consumption (quality and quantity) of SM before initiation of the treatment, but most were not severe headache sufferers, heavy SM overusers or were overusing opioids. After 5 weeks the headache frequency and intensity, the prevalence and frequency of withdrawal symptoms and consumption of rescue medications during the first 6 days were compared between groups. In addition, adherence to treatment (who returned or not and for which reasons, between groups) and headache frequency, week by week, among the groups of patients were also compared. Forty-four (88%) patients from the prednisone group, 41 (82%) from the 'nothing' group and 35 (70%) from the naratriptan group adhered to the treatment and returned. The were no differences between groups with regard to treatment adherence (P = 0.072), headache frequency as well as intensity (P = 0.311) and decreasing of days with headache after 5 weeks and weekly (P = 0.275). However, the incidence of withdrawal symptoms and consumption of rescue drugs was higher among the patients who did not take regular medications during the first 6 days (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.006). We concluded that CM patients with moderate overuse of SM other than opioids may be detoxified on an out-patient basis regardless of the strategy adopted with regard to the use of regular drugs during the initial days of withdrawal, but prednisone and naratriptan may be useful for reducing withdrawal symptoms and rescue medication consumption. Further controlled studies are necessary to confirm these observations.

Morbidity and Medication Preferences of Individuals With Headache Presenting to a Community Pharmacy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the degree of debilitation and the treatment views of individuals with headache presenting to a community pharmacy.

BACKGROUND

Migraine and chronic daily headache are common poorly managed illnesses. Pharmacists recommend an over-the-counter "headache product" to customers more than 53 000 times daily, thus they are well positioned to help those with headache.

DESIGN

Pilot project of 22 self-administered surveys of individuals presenting to a community pharmacy with a complaint of headache.

RESULTS

Thirteen persons had Migraine Disability Assessment scores of grade III or grade IV. Of the sample population, a substantial minority (41%) did not believe their headaches could be effectively managed with over-the-counter medications, 72% did not feel over-the-counter agents were safer than prescription products, 96% did not indicate that over-the-counter drugs were more effective than prescription drugs, and 50% disagreed that a physician's evaluation was not necessary. Only half of the population was satisfied with their current therapy, and individuals overwhelmingly (91%) wished they could prevent their headaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of individuals with headache presenting to a community pharmacy had high levels of morbidity and were in need of education regarding the proper role of over-the-counter medications, the advantages of prescription agents, and the benefits of a physician's referral. These preliminary results indicate that community pharmacies are potentially important locations for identification, education, and referral of individuals with headache.

Factors associated with the onset and remission of chronic daily headache in a population-based study

The etiology and prognosis of chronic daily headache (CDH) are not well understood. The aim of this study is to describe factors that predict CDH onset or remission in an adult population. Potential cases (180+ headaches per year, n=1134) and controls (two to 104 headaches per year, n=798) were interviewed two times over an average 11 months of follow-up. Factors associated with CDH prevalence at baseline were evaluated. The incidence of CDH and risk factors for onset were assessed in controls whose headache frequency increased to 180+ per year at follow-up. Prognostic factors were assessed in CDH cases whose headache frequency fell at follow-up. CDH was more common in women, in whites, and those of less education. CDH cases were more likely to be previously married (divorced, widowed, separated), obese, and report a physician diagnosis of diabetes or arthritis. At follow-up, 3% of the controls reported 180 or more headaches per year. Obesity and baseline headache frequency were significantly associated with new onset CDH. In CDH cases, the projected 1-year remission rate to less than one headache per week was 14% and to less than 180 headaches per year was 57%. A better prognosis was associated with higher education, non-white race, being married, and with diagnosed diabetes. Individuals with less than a high-school education, whites, and those who were previously married had a higher risk of CDH at baseline and reduced likelihood of remission at follow-up. New onset CDH was associated with baseline headache frequency and obesity.

Medications and substances as a cause of headache: a systematic review of the literature

Medication- or substance-induced headache is probably an underrecognized entity with numerous etiologies, including prescribed medication, over-the-counter medication, illicit drugs, anesthetic agents, foods, food additives, beverages, vitamins, inhaled substances, and substances used in diagnostic procedures. The author performs a systemic review of the literature to provide an exhaustive description of the relationship between medications and substances and headaches of various types, along with pathophysiologic mechanisms whenever possible. Suggestions for improved identification of this phenomenon and its avoidance are provided. More scientific evaluation of substances and their possible association with headache is required with almost all substances indicated herein.

Over-the-counter drugs for acute migraine attacks: literature review and recommendations

Migraines affect 28 million people in the United States, and most of these individuals experience attack-related morbidity. Six of every 10 patients with migraine treat their headache exclusively with over-the-counter (OTC) products. Overreliance on OTC agents contributes to preventable morbidity and drug-induced headaches. To evaluate the role of OTC drugs in the management of migraine headaches, we performed a qualitative systematic literature search by using MEDLINE (January 1966-April 2002), analyzed the references of articles returned by the MEDLINE search, and reviewed other pertinent literature. In the studied populations, acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, and an aspirin-acetaminophen-caffeine combination product were shown to be more effective than placebo at reducing moderate or severe migraine pain to mild or no pain by 2 hours after administration. However, published trials of OTC agents have systematically excluded patients enduring morbidity with 50% or more of attacks and/or vomiting with 20% or more of attacks. Patients who experience disability during the predominance of their attacks are poor candidates for OTC-exclusive therapy and should seek a physician's help for migraine-specific prescription drugs. For those with migraine who encounter disability with less than 50% of attacks and/or vomiting with less than 20% of attacks, sole treatment with OTC products is a feasible option. Patients who fail to obtain acceptable relief after an adequate trial of OTC agents also should be referred to a physician. Pharmacists are well positioned to assess whether patients could benefit from OTC agents or should seek a physician's assistance.

Opioid resistance in chronic daily headache: a synthesis of ideas from the bench and bedside

Chronic daily headache is a complex pain disorder that encompasses many diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Our understanding of the pathophysiologic processes of intermittent migraine has improved over the past decade, but the biologic basis of chronic daily headache remains obscure. Some of the more common issues confounding management of patients who experience chronic daily headache are medication overuse, psychiatric comorbidity, refractoriness to pharmacologic treatments, and disability. Long-acting opioid analgesics would appear to provide a viable treatment option for those patients who remain refractory to other treatment interventions; however, clinical experience often does not support this belief. Current concepts of the pathophysiologic basis of chronic pain and associated neural plasticity may elucidate a biologic basis for the general inefficacy of opioids in the management of chronic daily headache. This article explores the models of pathophysiology for migraine and chronic daily headache, the concept of chronic daily headache as a neuropathic pain syndrome, neural plasticity in the context of neuropathic pain states, the physiologic basis for opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and how each of these conditions interact to provoke the general lack of opioid efficacy often observed in the management of chronic daily headache.

American Headache Society members' assessment of headache diagnostic criteria

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the views of physicians interested in headache as to the diagnosis of the most commonly occurring and currently controversial headaches.

BACKGROUND

The International Headache Society (IHS) classification system has received wide professional endorsement and considerable empirical support, but in the United States, their adoption by clinicians may be proceeding more slowly. Questions remain, including what diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache clinicians may continue to favor over those outlined by the IHS, to what extent is the "transformed migraine" diagnosis used in clinical practice, and how is analgesic rebound headache diagnosed with regard to the various quantitative measures of analgesic use.

METHODS

Members of the American Headache Society rated the importance of IHS and non-IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache and for analgesic rebound headache. Respondents also described their use of the proposed transformed migraine diagnosis.

RESULTS

Two-thirds (67.3%) of the respondents reported use of the IHS criteria or the IHS criteria in conjunction with clinical judgment. For migraine and tension-type headache, IHS criteria were rated with high importance, but some respondents reported using additional non-IHS diagnostic criteria and de-emphasizing certain IHS criteria. For chronic headache, almost two-thirds (63%) of respondents reported using the transformed migraine diagnosis. For analgesic rebound headache, respondents preferred to make the diagnosis based on medication consumption that is lower than amounts stipulated in the IHS classification system.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains a number of physicians interested in headache who do not use the IHS classification system, who modify the IHS criteria in practice, and who use the "transformed migraine" diagnosis for patients with chronic daily headache.

Risk factors for chronic daily headache

There are many people who experience headaches that are independent of illness, injury, or hangover. Approximately 4% of the population suffer from headaches on a daily or near-daily basis. It is apparent that patients with chronic daily headache in community samples differ in important ways from patients with chronic daily headache in subspecialty clinics. In this manuscript, we review clinic-based data on risk factors for chronic daily headache and summarize the current data on the epidemiology of chronic daily headache.

Do butalbital-containing products have a role in the management of migraine?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of butalbital-containing products in the management of migraine.

METHODS

Qualitative systematic search using MEDLINE (January 1966-November 2001), review of the United States Headache Consortium's evidence-based guidelines for migraine treatment, and review of other pertinent literature.

RESULTS

Over 28 million people suffer with migraine, yet this illness is less than optimally diagnosed and managed. Between 14% and 36% of diagnosed migraineurs are prescribed butalbital-containing products, often as initial therapy. However, the only identified controlled trial of these drugs for migraine treatment showed that butalbital-containing products were inferior to butorphanol. The consortium's guidelines specifically discourage administration of butalbital-containing products for migraine. In addition, other published literature highlights the frequent adverse consequences of butalbital-containing products for migraineurs, such as poor migraine control, disability, drug-induced headaches, and withdrawal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Although butalbital-containing products commonly are prescribed for migraine, no evidence in the literature demonstrates their benefit over other agents or placebo. Drugs with proven migraine efficacy, as listed in the consortium's evidence-based guidelines, should be prescribed instead.

Practical approaches to migraine management

Migraine is a recurrent clinical syndrome characterised by combinations of neurological, gastrointestinal and autonomic manifestations. The exact pathophysiological disturbances that occur with migraine have yet to be elucidated; however, cervico-trigemino-vascular dysfunctions appear to be the primary cause. Despite advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine and new effective treatment options, migraine remains an under-diagnosed, under-treated and poorly treated health condition. Most patients will unsuccessfully attempt to treat their headaches with over-the-counter medications. Few well designed, placebo-controlled studies are available to guide physicians in medication selection. Recently published evidence-based guidelines advocate migraine-specific drugs, such as serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists (the 'triptans') and dihydroergotamine mesylate, for patients experiencing moderate to severe migraine attacks. Additional headache attack therapy options include other ergotamine derivatives, phenothiazines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and opioids. Preventative medication therapy is indicated for patients experiencing frequent and/or refractory attacks.

Headache education in colleges of pharmacy

OBJECTIVE

To assess primary headache education in colleges of pharmacy during the 2000-2001 academic year.

DESIGN

A survey seeking to quantify students' primary headache education was mailed to all 82 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy member schools.

RESULTS

A usable response was obtained from 65 of 74 answering schools. Per professional year, the average pharmacy student receives 1 headache core course contact hour and no headache elective course contact hours. Two schools offer clerkships devoted exclusively to headaches. Six schools offer clerkships in which a student could expect to focus on headache therapy at least 25% of the time. Seven schools plan to alter their current curriculum to include more headache education, all via additional lectures.

CONCLUSIONS

Few opportunities exist for students to learn about primary headaches in colleges of pharmacy. Given the high prevalence and poor medical management of primary headache disorders along with the commonality of pharmacist-headache patient interactions occurring in practice, pharmacy schools should evaluate and alter their curriculum to include more primary headache education.

Drug-associated headache is unrecognized in patients treated at a neurological centre

OBJECTIVE

We studied the frequency of unrecognized headache associated with overuse of analgesic drugs in a population of headache patients treated at a neurological centre.

METHODS

Patients in North Norway referred to a neurologist for headache during a 2-year period completed a questionnaire. From a total of 945, 262 patients (28%) reported headache 3 days or more per week and used analgesic drugs on a daily bases.

RESULTS

A specific diagnoses given by the neurologist was reported in 134 of the patients (51%). Only two patients reported that they suffered from a possible drug-associated headache.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that drug overuse may be the cause of chronic headache in more than 1/4 patients referred to neurologists. Drug-associated headache is a difficult diagnosis which deserves more attention because it is a common and treatable condition.

Are there predictive factors for long-term outcome after withdrawal in drug-induced chronic daily headache?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate prognostic factors for long-term outcome of patients after inpatient withdrawal because of drug-induced chronic daily headache.

PROCEDURES

Fifty-five patients (36 females) were re-examined by means of a standardized interview after inpatient withdrawal. The mean observation period was 9.28 +/- 2.85 years (mean +/- SD; median 8.58; range 5.00-13.50).

RESULTS

Five years after withdrawal, one-third of the patients (34.6%) had an overall favourable outcome, one-third (32.7%) had no recurrent drug overuse and reported a clear-cut improvement of headache, and one-third (32.7%) developed recurrent drug overuse. Most relapses occurred within 2 years, and a small percentage within 5 years. No predictors for long-term outcome after inpatient withdrawal were found.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients with drug-induced chronic daily headache should be considered as good candidates for inpatient withdrawal, and no patient should be excluded from that therapy.

Current options for the prevention and treatment of migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common condition affecting approximately 18% of women and 6% of men in the United States. The goals of managing migraine are 2-fold: to prevent attacks from occurring and to effectively and rapidly end them when they do occur.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the acute and prophylactic treatment of migraine.

METHODS

Information for inclusion in this review was identified through a search of MEDLINE from 1995 to the present. Search terms included migraine, acute treatment, prophylactic treatment, preventive treatment, and individual drug names.

RESULTS

Preventive measures for migraine include lifestyle changes (eg, avoiding migraine triggers and maintaining regular sleep, eating, and work habits) and drug therapy. Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, and anticonvulsants are among the more common drug classes used for migraine prophylaxis, but preventive therapy must be individualized, taking into account efficacy, potential adverse effects, co-existing medical conditions, and drug costs. Many medications are available for the acute treatment of migraine, including over-the-counter analgesics and prescription drugs. Of the latter, the 5-hydroxytryptamine(1B/1D)-receptor agonists, or triptans, are the most recently introduced class. Each of the 4 available triptans (sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, and rizatriptan) is effective in ending a migraine attack, but comparative trials have shown differences between individual drugs in the time to pain relief and the percentage of patients who obtain pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Medications to prevent or reduce the frequency of migraine tend to be less specific and effective than medications for the acute treatment of migraine. As a class, triptans are generally well tolerated and may be considered drugs of choice for the acute treatment of moderate to severe migraine.

Withdrawal therapy improves chronic daily headache associated with long-term misuse of headache medication: a retrospective study

Chronic daily headache (CDH) associated with long-term misuse of headache medication is a common clinical problem which is refractory to most treatments. The present study is a retrospective analysis of the effect of drug withdrawal therapy in patients with CDH and frequent long-term use of headache symptomatic medication. One hundred and one adult patients (74 women and 27 men, aged between 16 and 72 years, mean age 43 years) were evaluated 1-3 months after drug withdrawal therapy had been initiated. The mean headache frequency at baseline was 26.9+/-4.0 days per month. Fifty-seven (56%) patients were significantly improved (defined as at least 50% reduction in number of headache days) after a period of drug withdrawal therapy. Based on the outcome of the drug withdrawal therapy, the patients were divided into three categories: group I, those who had between 0 and 10 headache days per month (n = 41), group II, those who had 11-20 days (n = 37), and group III, those who had 21-30 days (n = 23). The mean headache frequencies in groups I, II and III were 5.6+/-2.8 days, 15.7+/-2.5 days and 28.7+/-2.4 days, respectively. Treatment with amitriptyline was offered to patients in whom no improvement had been achieved. Ten of those 22 patients (36%) experienced a significant (> or = 50%) reduction of headache days. It is concluded that out-patient drug withdrawal therapy is the treatment of choice in patients with CDH and frequent long-term use of headache symptomatic medication, and that about one quarter of these CDH patients do not respond to drug withdrawal therapy only.