Fatal fulminant hepatitis associated with bromfenac use

Role of microsomal metabolism in bromfenac-induced cytotoxicity

This study delves into the intricate mechanisms underlying drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with a specific focus on bromfenac, the withdrawn nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. DILI is a pervasive concern in drug development, prompting market withdrawals and posing significant challenges to healthcare. Despite the withdrawal of bromfenac due to DILI, the exact role of its microsomal metabolism in inducing hepatotoxicity remains unclear. Herein, employing HepG2 cells with human liver microsomes and UDP-glucuronic acid (UDPGA), our investigation revealed a substantial increase in bromfenac-induced cytotoxicity in the presence of UDPGA, pointing to the significance of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)-dependent metabolism in augmenting toxicity. Notably, among the recombinant UGTs examined, UGT2B7 emerged as a pivotal enzyme in the metabolic activation of bromfenac. Metabolite identification studies disclosed the formation of reactive intermediates, with bromfenac indolinone (lactam) identified as a potential mediator of hepatotoxic effects. Moreover, in cytotoxicity experiments, the toxicity of bromfenac lactam exhibited a 34-fold increase, relative to bromfenac. The toxicity of bromfenac lactam was mitigated by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-dependent metabolism. This finding underscores the role of UGT-dependent metabolism in generating reactive metabolites that contribute to the observed hepatotoxicity associated with bromfenac. Understanding these metabolic pathways and the involvement of specific enzymes, such as UGT2B7, provides crucial insights into the mechanisms of bromfenac-induced liver injury. In conclusion, this research sheds light on the metabolic intricacies leading to cytotoxicity induced by bromfenac, especially emphasizing the role of UGT-dependent metabolism and the formation of reactive intermediates like bromfenac lactam. These findings offer insight into the mechanistic basis of DILI and emphasize the importance of understanding metabolism-mediated toxicity.

Metabolite Profiling and Reaction Phenotyping for the in Vitro Assessment of the Bioactivation of Bromfenac †

Bromfenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that was approved and subsequently withdrawn from the market because of reported cases of acute hepatotoxicity. Recently, in vitro studies have revealed that bromfenac requires UDPGA and alamethicin supplemented human liver microsomes (HLM) to form a major metabolite, bromfenac indolinone (BI). Bromfenac and BI form thioether adducts through a bioactivation pathway in HLM and hepatocytes. [J. P. Driscoll et al., Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2018, 31, 223-230.] Here, Cytochrome P450 (CYP) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) reaction phenotyping experiments using recombinant enzymes were performed on bromfenac and BI to identify the CYP and UGT enzymes responsible for bromfenac's metabolism and bioactivation. It was determined that UGT2B7 converts bromfenac to BI, and that while CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 catalyze the hydroxylation of bromfenac, only CYP2C9 forms thioether adducts when incubated with NAC or GSH as trapping agents. Although CYP2C9 was shown to form a reactive intermediate, no inhibition of CYP2C9 was observed when an IC₅₀ shift assay was performed. Reaction phenotyping experiments with BI and recombinant CYP enzymes indicated that CYPs 1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 were responsible for the formation of an aliphatic hydroxylated metabolite. An aromatic hydroxylation on the indolinone moiety was also formed by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4. The aromatic hydroxylated BI is a precursor to the quinone methide and quinone imine intermediates in the proposed bioactivation pathway. Through time-dependent inhibition (TDI) experiments, it was revealed that BI can cause an IC₅₀ shift in CYP1A2 and CYP3A4. However, BI does not inhibit the other isoforms that were also responsible for the formation of the aliphatic hydroxylation, an alternative biotransformation that does not undergo further downstream bioactivation. The results of these metabolism studies with bromfenac and BI add to our understanding of the relationship between biotransformation, reactive intermediate generation, and a potential mechanistic link to the hepatotoxicity of this compound.

Role of Glucuronidation and P450 Oxidation in the Bioactivation of Bromfenac

Bromfenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that was approved in the United States in 1997. It was withdrawn from clinical use less than one year later, in 1998, due to hepatotoxicity. We investigate the potential of bromfenac to be metabolized to reactive intermediates to further the current understanding of bromfenac bioactivation. Incubations were conducted with hepatocytes and human, rat, and cynomolgus liver microsomes fortified with cofactors and N-acetylcysteine. One thioether adduct of hydroxylated bromfenac and three thioether adducts of hydroxylated bromfenac indolinone were detected in extracts following incubations in liver microsomes fortified with NADPH and UDPGA. These findings demonstrate a bioactivation pathway for bromfenac and contribute to the body of evidence that could advance the understanding of the toxicity associated with bromfenac.

FXR antagonism of NSAIDs contributes to drug-induced liver injury identified by systems pharmacology approach

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are worldwide used drugs for analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory therapeutics. However, NSAIDs often cause several serious liver injuries, such as drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and the molecular mechanisms of DILI have not been clearly elucidated. In this study, we developed a systems pharmacology approach to explore the mechanism-of-action of NSAIDs. We found that the Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) antagonism of NSAIDs is a potential molecular mechanism of DILI through systematic network analysis and in vitro assays. Specially, the quantitative real-time PCR assay reveals that indomethacin and ibuprofen regulate FXR downstream target gene expression in HepG2 cells. Furthermore, the western blot shows that FXR antagonism by indomethacin induces the phosphorylation of STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), promotes the activation of caspase9, and finally causes DILI. In summary, our systems pharmacology approach provided novel insights into molecular mechanisms of DILI for NSAIDs, which may propel the ways toward the design of novel anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapeutics.

Profiling cumulative proportional reporting ratios of drug-induced liver injury in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

BACKGROUND

Early prediction and accurate characterization of risk for serious liver injury associated with newly marketed drugs remains an important challenge for clinicians, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulators. To date, a biomarker that specifically indicates exposure to a drug as the etiologic cause of liver injury has not been identified.

OBJECTIVES

Using cumulative proportional reporting ratios (PRRs), we investigated 'real-time' profiles of a set of pharmaceuticals, over the first 3 years of US marketing, for the signaling of clinically serious drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in a large spontaneous-reporting database.

METHODS

Using report counts of hepatic failure or clinically serious liver injury obtained from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database, PRRs of adverse drug event terms were calculated by division of counts of domestic reports of these events by counts of all serious adverse events for each of 13 selected drugs associated with a broad range of hepatotoxic risk (including three linked to only rare instances of clinically apparent liver injury) with reference to all other drugs in the database. Drug-specific cumulative PRRs were measured at successive intervals (calendar quarters) using cumulative tallies of FAERS reports to generate time-based profiles over the initial 3 years of US marketing.

RESULTS

In the set of drugs analyzed, those with no known hepatotoxic risk demonstrated time-based cumulative PRR profiles that approximate the background rates of hepatic failure and serious liver injury reported in the entire FAERS database. In contrast, those that were removed from marketing or subjected to marketing restrictions due to their potential to cause liver injury were associated with profiles of rapidly rising cumulative PRRs that were greater than 5 within the first 10 million domestic prescriptions or the first four quarters of US marketing. The systematic tracking and identification of rising PRRs for DILI associated with newly marketed pharmaceutical and biological agents is a valuable tool for identification of safety signals within the FAERS database.

LIMITATIONS

Disproportionality profiling of spontaneous reports in FAERS (e.g., cumulative PRR measurements), which signals an association between a recently marketed drug and liver injury, is not a method to quantitatively measure drug-related risk. Regulatory actions in response to emerging drug safety concerns often depend on an accurate assessment of risks using multiple sources of data and the consideration of overall benefits and risks of the agent. Causality must be determined through analysis of individual cases to exclude other etiologies of liver injury.

CONCLUSION

The FAERS database can be used to advance empiric hepatotoxicity time-trending reporting levels for newly marketed agents in order to rapidly identify recently launched potential hepatotoxic agents and initiate further evaluation.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced hepatoxicity

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are among the most prescribed medications worldwide. After antibiotics and anticonvulsants they are considered the most common medications associated with drug-induced liver injury mainly through an idiosyncratic form of hepatotoxicity. In rare cases severe hepatotoxicity has been described with significant morbidity and mortality. Genetic risk factors have been reported with diclofenac and lumiracoxib. Postmarketing surveillance and monitoring is crucial to identify severe cases of hepatotoxicity.

How to avoid being surprised by hepatotoxicity at the final stages of drug development and approval

Drugs that caused severe drug-induced live injury (DILI) in humans have typically not shown clear hepatotoxic signals in preclinical assessment. However, clinical trial databases may show evidence of a drug's potential for severe DILI if clinical and laboratory data are evaluated for evidence of milder liver injury. The most specific indicator during a clinical trial for a drug's potential to cause severe DILI is occurrence of cases of drug induced hepatocellular injury accompanied by altered liver function (eg, elevated direct bilirubin). Meticulous causality assessment of hepatic cases and strict adherence to hepatic discontinuation rules are critical components of this approach.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: What is the actual risk of liver damage?

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute a family of drugs, which taken as a group, represents one of the most frequently prescribed around the world. Thus, not surprisingly NSAIDs, along with anti-infectious agents, list on the top for causes of Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI). The incidence of liver disease induced by NSAIDs reported in clinical studies is fairly uniform ranging from 0.29/100 000 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-051] to 9/100 000 (95% CI: 6-15). However, compared with these results, a higher risk of liver-related hospitalizations was reported (3-23 per 100 000 patients). NSAIDs exhibit a broad spectrum of liver damage ranging from asymptomatic, transient, hyper-transaminasemia to fulminant hepatic failure. However, under-reporting of asymptomatic, mild cases, as well as of those with transient liver-tests alteration, in conjunction with reports non-compliant with pharmacovigilance criteria to ascertain DILI and flawed epidemiological studies, jeopardize the chance to ascertain the actual risk of NSAIDs hepatotoxicity. Several NSAIDs, namely bromfenac, ibufenac and benoxaprofen, have been withdrawn from the market due to hepatotoxicity; others like nimesulide were never marketed in some countries and withdrawn in others. Indeed, the controversy concerning the actual risk of severe liver disease persists within NSAIDs research. The present work intends (1) to provide a critical analysis of the dissimilar results currently available in the literature concerning the epidemiology of NSAIDS hepatotoxicity; and (2) to review the risk of hepatotoxicity for each one of the most commonly employed compounds of the NSAIDs family, based on past and recently published data.

Drug-induced liver injury

Many drugs and environmental chemicals are capable of evoking some degree of liver injury. The liver represents a primary target for adverse drug reactions due to its central role in biotransformation and excretion of foreign compounds, its portal location within the circulation exposing it to a wide variety of substances, and its anatomic and physiologic structure. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains the single most common adverse indication leading to drug candidate failure or withdrawal from the market. However, the absolute incidence of DILI is low, and this presents a challenge to mechanistic studies. DILI remains unpredictable making prevention very difficult. In this chapter, we focus on the current understanding of DILI. We begin with an overview regarding the significance and epidemiology of DILI and then examine the clinical presentation and susceptibility factors related to DILI. This is followed by a review of the current literature regarding the proposed pathogenesis of DILI, which involves the participation of a drug, or most often a reactive metabolite of the drug, that either directly affects cellular function or elicits an immune response. It is our hope that this chapter will shed light on the major problems associated with DILI in regards to the pharmaceutical industry, drug regulatory agencies, physicians and pharmacists, and patients.

The hepatic safety and tolerability of the cyclooxygenase-2 selective NSAID celecoxib: pooled analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess the hepatic safety and tolerability of celecoxib versus placebo and three commonly prescribed nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, pooled analysis of a 41-study dataset involving patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic low back pain, and Alzheimer's disease. Criteria for selection of studies were: (1) Randomized, parallel-group design and planned treatment duration of > or =2 weeks (2) > or =1 placebo or NSAID comparator (3) > or =1 arm with celecoxib at total daily dose of > or =200 mg (4) Data available as of October 31, 2004 Data were pooled by treatment and subject from the safety analysis population of included studies. Treatment-emergent hepatobiliary adverse events (AEs) were compared for celecoxib <200 mg/day (943 patients), 200 mg/day (12 008 patients), 400 mg/day (7380 patients), and 800 mg/day (4602 patients); placebo (4057 patients); diclofenac 100-150 mg/day (7639 patients); naproxen 1000 mg/day (2953 patients); and ibuprofen 2400 mg/day (2484 patients). Hepatobiliary laboratory abnormalities were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no cases of liver failure, treatment-related liver transplant, or treatment-related hepatobiliary death. Incidence of serious hepatic AEs was low, with 13 (0.05%) serious hepatic AEs among 24 933 celecoxib-treated patients, and 16 (0.21%) among 7639 diclofenac-treated patients. No patients receiving celecoxib or any nonselective NSAID met criteria for Hy's rule (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] > or =3 x upper limit of normal [ULN] with bilirubin > or =2 x ULN). The incidence of notable (> or =5 x ULN) and severe (> or =10 x ULN) ALT elevations was similar for all treatment groups except diclofenac. Significantly fewer hepatobiliary AEs were reported for celecoxib (any dose; 1.11%) than for diclofenac (vs. 4.24%, p < 0.0001); for ibuprofen (vs. 1.53%, p = 0.06) and placebo (vs. 0.89%, p = 0.21) the incidence of AEs was comparable to celecoxib.

LIMITATIONS

A number of limitations should be considered when evaluating the results: findings were limited by the quality and reporting of the studies selected; difficulty in estimating the incidence of AEs due to the low frequency of events; acetaminophen not included as an active comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pooled analysis, the incidence of hepatic AEs in patients treated with celecoxib was similar to that for both placebo-treated patients and patients treated with ibuprofen or naproxen, but lower than for diclofenac.

Role of Metabolism in Drug-Induced Idiosyncratic Hepatotoxicity

Rare adverse reactions to drugs that are of unknown etiology, or idiosyncratic reactions, can produce severe medical complications or even death in patients. Current hypotheses suggest that metabolic activation of a drug to a reactive intermediate is a necessary, yet insufficient, step in the generation of an idiosyncratic reaction. We review evidence for this hypothesis with drugs that are associated with hepatotoxicity, one of the most common types of idiosyncratic reactions in humans. We identified 21 drugs that have either been withdrawn from the U.S. market due to hepatotoxicity or have a black box warning for hepatotoxicity. Evidence for the formation of reactive metabolites was found for 5 out of 6 drugs that were withdrawn, and 8 out of 15 drugs that have black box warnings. For the other drugs, either evidence was not available or suitable studies have not been carried out. We also review evidence for reactive intermediate formation from a number of additional drugs that have been associated with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity but do not have black box warnings. Finally, we consider the potential role that high dosages may play in these adverse reactions.

Computational chemistry approach for the early detection of drug-induced idiosyncratic liver toxicity

Idiosyncratic drug toxicity (IDT), considered as a toxic host-dependent event, with an apparent lack of dose response relationship, is usually not predictable from early phases of clinical trials, representing a particularly confounding complication in drug development. Albeit a rare event (usually <1/5000), IDT is often life threatening and is one of the major reasons new drugs never reach the market or are withdrawn post marketing. Computational methodologies, like the computer-based approach proposed in the present study, can play an important role in addressing IDT in early drug discovery. We report for the first time a systematic evaluation of classification models to predict idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA), artificial neural networks (ANN), and machine learning algorithms (OneR) in conjunction with a 3D molecular structure representation and feature selection methods. These modeling techniques (LDA, feature selection to prevent over-fitting and multicollinearity, ANN to capture nonlinear relationships in the data, as well as the simple OneR classifier) were found to produce QSTR models with satisfactory internal cross-validation statistics and predictivity on an external subset of chemicals. More specifically, the models reached values of accuracy/sensitivity/specificity over 84%/78%/90%, respectively in the training series along with predictivity values ranging from ca. 78 to 86% of correctly classified drugs. An LDA-based desirability analysis was carried out in order to select the levels of the predictor variables needed to trigger the more desirable drug, i.e. the drug with lower potential for idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. Finally, two external test sets were used to evaluate the ability of the models in discriminating toxic from nontoxic structurally and pharmacologically related drugs and the ability of the best model (LDA) in detecting potential idiosyncratic hepatotoxic drugs, respectively. The computational approach proposed here can be considered as a useful tool in early IDT prognosis.

Topical Bromfenac Sodium for Long-Term Management of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term management of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) with bromfenac sodium eye drops in combination with corticosteroids and anti-allergic eye drops.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with VKC were randomly assigned to receive two test eye drops, either bromfenac sodium 0.1% (group A) or placebo eye drops (normal saline; group B) for a mean observation period of 20.9 months. Topical corticosteroids and mast cell stabilizers were continued during the observation period.

RESULTS

The mean 2-year recurrence rate was 90.9% in group A and 11.3% in group B, with a significant difference. No serious side effect was observed in group A.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that bromfenac sodium eye drops can be used as baseline local treatment in patients with VKC.

A systematic review of NSAIDs withdrawn from the market due to hepatotoxicity: lessons learned from the bromfenac experience

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity is the leading cause of acute liver failure (ALF) in the US and the most common adverse event causing drug non-approval and drug withdrawal by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Three different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been withdrawn in the UK and/or the US due to hepatotoxicity (bromfenac, ibufenac, and benoxaprofen). A systematic review of clinical trials data for these drugs was performed in an effort to identify possible early signals that could have predicted post-marketing serious hepatoxicity. There were very limited published data on benoxaprofen and none on ibufenac or bromfenac. The publicly accessible archives of the FDA provided information on bromfenac. Flu-like symptoms associated with hepatic enzyme elevation and a case of possible drug-related hepatocellular jaundice may in retrospect have been signals for serious hepatotoxicity in the database of 1195 subjects reviewed by the FDA. Following approval, rates of acute liver failure for bromfenac were estimated to be in the range of 1:10 000. In addition, the safety databases of several drugs also accessed through FDA archives have been reviewed (simvastatin, tacrine, troglitazone, and ximelagatran). These data suggest that while ALT elevations alone do not reliably signal serious hepatotoxicity, elevated transaminases in association with symptomatic hepatitis or jaundice may be predictors of an increased risk of ALF. At present, however, pre-approval databases are generally not large enough to rule out low rates of serious hepatotoxicity. Therefore, it remains critical that clinicians report such cases to the FDA through the MEDWATCH system and that active post-marketing monitoring studies be used to identify potential rare cases of hepatotoxicity.

Investigation of proteomic biomarkers in in vivo hepatotoxicity study of rat liver: toxicity differentiation in hepatotoxicants

We investigated the overall protein expression profiles in the in vivo hepatotoxicity of rats induced by four well-recognized hepatotoxicants. Acetaminophen (APAP), amiodarone (AMD), tetracycline (TC) and carbon tetrachloride (CTC) were administered to male rats by gavages and the liver at 24 hr post-dosing was applied to the proteomic experiment. Blood biochemistry and histopathology were examined to identify specific changes related to the compounds given. Protein expression in the liver was investigated by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE), and spots showing a significantly different expression in treated versus control group were excised from gels and identified by Q-Tof mass spectrometer. They were well characterized based on their functions related to the mechanisms of toxicity of the compounds. Among them, we focused on the 8 proteins that were affected by all 4 compounds examined. Proteins related to oxidative stress response such as carbonic anhydrase III (CA3) and 60kDa heat shock protein (HSP60), and energy metabolism such as adenylate kinase 4 (AK4) were found. Moreover, hierarchical clustering analysis using 2D-gel spots information revealed the possibility to differentiate the groups based on their toxicity levels such as severity of liver damage. These results suggested that assessing the effects of hepatotoxicants on protein expression is worth trying to screen candidate compounds at the developmental stage of drugs.

Comparison of cyclooxygenase inhibitory activity and ocular anti-inflammatory effects of ketorolac tromethamine and bromfenac sodium

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cyclooxygenase (COX) activity and anti-inflammatory effects of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) ketorolac tromethamine (ketorolac) and bromfenac sodium (bromfenac).

METHODS

Cyclooxygenase activity and selectivity was determined in vitro by measuring prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) production following incubation of varying concentrations of NSAID with human recombinant COX-1 or COX-2 and arachidonic acid. Anti-inflammatory effects were evaluated in a rabbit model in which an ocular inflammatory response was induced by intravenous injection of 10 microg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In study animals, one eye was treated with 50 microL (+/-) ketorolac 0.4% (Acular LS) or bromfenac 0.09% (Xibrom) and the other eye with 50 microL buffered saline. In control animals, both eyes were treated with vehicle. All animals were treated twice: 2 hours and 1 hour before LPS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PGE(2) production in vitro, measured by enzyme immunoassay; fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran leakage into the anterior chamber, measured by fluorophotometry; aqueous PGE(2) levels in vivo, measured by ELISA immunoassay.

RESULTS

Ketorolac was six times more active against COX-1 (IC(50) = 0.02 microM) than COX-2 (IC(50) = 0.12 microM) while bromfenac was approximately 32 times more active against COX-2 (IC(50) = 0.0066 microM) than COX-1 (IC(50) = 0.210 microM). In the animal model, both drugs resulted in nearly complete inhibition of FITC-dextran leakage and PGE(2) production in the anterior chamber of treated eyes. There was also a 79% inhibition (p < 0.001) of FITC-dextran leakage in the contralateral eyes of bromfenac-treated rabbits, and a 22.5% inhibition (not statistically significant) in the contralateral eyes of ketorolac-treated rabbits.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketorolac is relatively COX-1 selective while bromfenac is potently selective for COX-2 over COX-1. In the animal model, both ketorolac 0.4% and bromfenac 0.09% demonstrated maximal anti-inflammatory activity in treated eyes. Only bromfenac 0.09% had a significant effect on the contralateral eye, suggesting possible systemic absorption of this drug.

Systematic review: the hepatotoxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been implicated in reports of liver injury. However, the precise risk of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for this rare complication is unknown.

AIM

To review systematically the published literature of population-based epidemiological studies reporting the incidence or comparative risk of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for liver injury resulting in clinically significant events, defined as hospitalization or death.

DATA EXTRACTION

Duplicate extraction of the methodological quality, design, source, population, years studied, particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs studied, definitions, patient counts and follow-up, and the adjustment for confounders.

RESULTS

Seven articles met inclusion criteria. The comparative risk of liver injury resulting in hospitalization for current non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users compared with past non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users ranged from 1.2 to 1.7, but none was statistically significant. The incidence of liver injury resulting in hospitalization ranged from 3.1 to 23.4/100,000 patient-years of current use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with an excess risk compared with past non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs users of 4.8-8.6/100,000 patient-years of exposure. There were zero deaths from liver injury associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use in over 396,392 patient-years of cumulative exposure.

CONCLUSION

These findings allow for the possibility of a small increase in the risk of clinically relevant hepatotoxicity with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use, but do not document that such a risk occurs.

Hepatocellular damage from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for the management of rheumatological disorders, and as analgesics and antipyretics. Hepatotoxicity is an uncommon, but potentially lethal complication, which usually occurs within 12 weeks of starting therapy. It can occur with all NSAIDs, but appears to be more common with diclofenac and particularly sulindac. Female patients aged >50 years, with autoimmune disease, and those on other potentially hepatotoxic drugs, appear to be particularly susceptible. Liver function test abnormalities generally settle within 4-6 weeks of stopping the causative drug. However, some patients may develop acute liver failure and successful orthotopic liver transplantation may be undertaken in such patients. Recent in vitro animal studies have shown that the mechanism of diclofenac toxicity relates both to impairment of ATP synthesis by mitochondria, and to production of active metabolites, particularly n,5-dihydroxydiclofenac, which causes direct cytotoxicity. Mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) has also been shown to be important in diclofenac-induced liver injury, resulting in generation of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial swelling and oxidation of NADP and protein thiols. Physicians and hepatologists must be vigilant to the hepatotoxic potential of any NSAID, as increased awareness, surveillance and reporting of these events will lead to a better understanding of the risk factors and the pathophysiology of NSAID-related hepatotoxicity.

A review of the common properties of drugs with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity and the "multiple determinant hypothesis" for the manifestation of idiosyncratic drug toxicity

Idiosyncratic drug toxicity is generally believed to be a phenomenon that cannot be readily evaluated experimentally. Reasons for this difficulty include the following: 1. It is a rare event (<1/5,000) and therefore impossible to be studied in clinical trials; 2. It is a human-specific event not detectable in experimental animals. To aid the understanding of idiosyncratic toxicity and to develop an experimental strategy for this phenomenon, a hypothesis is proposed. The hypothesis states that the low frequency of idiosyncratic drug toxicity is due to the requirements for the occurrence of multiple critical and discrete events, with the probability for the occurrence of idiosyncratic drug toxicity as a product of the probabilities of each event. The key determinants of these critical events are proposed to be: 1. Chemical properties; 2. exposure; 3. environmental factors; and 4. genetic factors. Based on this hypothesis, idiosyncratic drug toxicity can be evaluated experimentally via studying these key determinants. The chemical properties critical to idiosyncratic drug toxicity are identified via a review of the common properties of drugs that cause idiosyncratic liver toxicity. These properties include: 1. Formation of reactive metabolites. 2. Metabolism by P450 isoforms. 3. Preponderance of P450 inducers, and 4. Occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with co-administered drugs. Based on this review, it is proposed that these common properties may be useful experimental endpoints for the prediction and therefore avoidance of the selection of drug candidates with idiosyncratic drug toxicity for further development.

Over-the-counter analgesics: a toxicology perspective

The decision to use any analgesic is a balance of benefit and risk. In the case of analgesics, it is important to balance the therapeutic benefit against both the risk in therapeutic use and the risk (and ease of treatment) in overdose. Paracetamol in therapeutic dose carries little risk of adverse events. Less than 0.1% of the estimated 30 million paracetamol users in the United Kingdom attend hospital with a paracetamol overdose each year, and approximately 200 people die, most of whom presented late or did not receive antidote, N-acetylcysteine, within 12 hours. Nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have greater adverse effects in therapeutic use than paracetamol but also have a lower incidence of severe features or death in overdose. There is no antidote available for NSAID poisoning. Aspirin carries both significant adverse effects in therapeutic dose and a substantial risk in overdose, for which there is no antidote. Its risk-benefit profile is probably the poorest of all analgesics currently available over-the-counter (OTC); this is reflected in current trends both in analgesic use and overdose figures. Although a number of options to reduce deaths from poisoning by OTC analgesics have been considered, few are practical, and all must take account of the public health benefits provided by these drugs. A perspective should be retained that the vast majority of the population in Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Denmark derive therapeutic benefit from OTC analgesics and do not take them in overdose. The majority of those who do take overdoses come to little or no harm. Management of serious poisoning by paracetamol, aspirin, or NSAIDs remains a medical challenge.

Acute liver failure

Worldwide, viral hepatitis is the leading cause of acute liver failure, whereas acetaminophen hepatotoxicity is the most commonly identified cause in Western countries. Restricting the quantity of acetaminophen tablets dispensed has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in countries with a high incidence of acetaminophen overdose. Troglitazone and bromfenac are two recently approved medications that were withdrawn from the market due to an unacceptably high incidence of severe hepatotoxicity. In addition, trovafloxacin, nefazodone, and ritonavir were reported to be associated with severe hepatitis and acute liver failure. Moderate hypothermia is a simple and potentially effective means of reducing intracranial pressure in patients with acute liver failure and cerebral edema. However, controlled clinical trials are needed to determine proper patient selection and optimize treatment. Extracorporeal bioartificial liver support devices remain an exciting but as yet unproven means of supporting acute liver failure patients with advanced encephalopathy. Living donor liver transplantation has recently been reported for adults and children with acute liver failure. However, ethical concerns regarding donor safety and the ability to obtain informed consent without coercion have been raised. Lastly, advances in the identification and isolation of pluripotent liver stem cells in human bone marrow provides hope for a simple and effective means of enhancing native liver regeneration.

Drug-induced liver disease

The incidence of drug-induced liver disease appears to be increasing, reflecting the increasing number of new agents that have been introduced into clinical use over the past several decades. Among the topics covered, the author discusses incidence, diagnosis, risk factors, clinical presentations, hepatitis, and vascular injury. The author also reviews the hepatic injury seen with commonly prescribed drugs, emphasizing newer developments in the field and recent publications and reports.