The Effect of Structural Violence on Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

Health Supervision for Children and Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease: Clinical Report

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of complex genetic disorders of hemoglobin with multisystem manifestations. The scope of this clinical report is such that in-depth recommendations for management of all complications is not possible. Rather, the authors present an overview focused on the practical management of children and adolescents with SCD and the complications that are of particular relevance to pediatric primary care providers. References with detailed commentary provide further information. Timely and appropriate treatment of acute illness is critical, because life-threatening complications may develop rapidly. Specialized comprehensive medical care decreases morbidity and mortality during childhood. The provision of comprehensive care is a time-intensive endeavor that includes ongoing patient and family education, periodic comprehensive evaluations and other disease-specific health maintenance services, nursing support, psychosocial care, and genetic counseling. Ideally, this care includes comanagement by the pediatrician or other pediatric primary care provider and a team of specialist SCD experts: Hematologist, other pediatric specialists, advanced practice providers, nurse specialists, social workers, patient navigators, and educational liaisons.

Effects of Experienced Discrimination in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Caregiver and Provider Perspectives

For Black children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and their families, high disease stigmatization and pervasive racism increase susceptibility to discrimination in healthcare settings. Childhood experiences of discrimination can result in medical nonadherence, mistrust of healthcare providers, and poorer health outcomes across the lifespan. Caregivers and medical providers are essential to childhood SCD management and are therefore well-positioned to provide insight into discrimination in the context of pediatric SCD. This mixed-methods study sought caregivers' and providers' perspectives on processes underlying discrimination and potential solutions to mitigate the negative effects of perceived discrimination among children with SCD. Caregivers (N = 27) of children with SCD (≤ 12 years old) and providers from their hematology clinics (N = 11) participated in individual semi-structured interviews exploring experiences of discrimination and daily SCD management and completed a quantitative measure of discrimination. Qualitative data were collected until themes reached saturation and subsequently transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data converged to suggest the pervasiveness of discrimination in healthcare settings. Three qualitative themes emerged: (1) healthcare system factors underlie discrimination, (2) families' challenging interactions with providers lead to perceptions of discrimination, and (3) experiences of discrimination impact caregiver-provider interactions. Both caregivers and providers highlighted building trusting patient-provider relationships and encouraging patients' self-advocacy as means to reduce experiences and impacts of discrimination. These findings offer potential approaches to tangibly mitigate occurrences of discrimination in pediatric healthcare settings by trust building, accountability keeping, and fostering rapport to improve quality of care and pediatric SCD health outcomes.

The Bias of Medicine in Sickle Cell Disease

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common monogenetic condition in the United States (US) and one that has been subjected to a history of negative bias. Since SCD was first described approximately 120 years ago, the medical establishment has, directly and indirectly, harmed patients by reinforcing biases and assumptions about the disease. Furthermore, negative biases and stigmas have been levied upon patients with SCD by healthcare providers and society, researchers, and legislators. This article will explore the historical context of SCD in the US; discuss specific issues in care that lead to biases, social and self-stigma, inequities in access to care, and research funding; and highlight interventions over recent years that address racial biases and stigma.

Hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of guided relaxation and acupuncture for chronic sickle cell disease pain (GRACE): A protocol

Background

People with sickle cell disease frequently use complementary and integrative therapies to cope with their pain, yet few studies have evaluated their effectiveness. The 3-arm, 3-site pragmatic Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial of Guided Relaxation and Acupuncture for Chronic Sickle Cell Disease Pain (GRACE) has 3 priorities: (1) evaluate guided relaxation and acupuncture to improve pain control; (2) determine the most appropriate and effective treatment sequence for any given patient based on their unique characteristics; and (3) describe the processes and structures required to implement guided relaxation and acupuncture within health care systems.

Methods

Participants (N = 366) are being recruited and randomized 1:1:1 to one of 2 intervention groups or usual care. The acupuncture intervention group receives 10 sessions over approximately 5 weeks. The guided relaxation intervention group receives access to video sessions ranging from 2 to 20 min each viewed daily over 5 weeks. The usual care group receives the standard of clinical care for sickle cell disease. Participants are re-randomized at 6 weeks depending on their pain impact score. Assessments occur at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in pain impact score and secondary measures include opioid use, anxiety, depression, sleep, pain catastrophizing, substance use, global impression of change, constipation, and hospitalizations. The GRACE study uses the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to plan, execute, and evaluate the associated implementation processes.

Conclusion

The results from GRACE will represent a critical step toward improving management of pain affecting patients with sickle cell disease.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04906447.

Sickle cell disease and social determinants of health: A scoping review

Social determinants of health (SDoH) may impact outcomes in sickle cell disease (SCD). We conducted a comprehensive literature review of five electronic databases to elucidate the relationship between SDoH and SCD, and identify gaps in the literature. Our search yielded 59 articles, which we organized into five SDoH areas: Neighborhood and Built Environment, Health and Healthcare, Social and Community Context, Education, and Economic Stability. We found that social determinants, such as access to healthcare, were inconsistently evaluated. Improved recognition and understanding of SDoH should enhance the development of programs that directly address its detrimental effects on patients with SCD.

An Integrative Review: The Evolution of Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions and Perceived Barriers to Caring for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease 1970-Now

Approximately 100,000 Americans have sickle cell disease (SCD). In the USA, the majority of patients with SCD are of African descent. Due to persistent racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare in the USA, patients with SCD experience disproportionately more health inequities because of providers' implicit biases regarding patient race. Lack of access to health insurance, lack of transportation to healthcare providers, and inadequate provider knowledge contribute to the morbidity and mortality of patients with SCD. The purpose of this integrative review was to analyze and synthesize the literature on providers' knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes toward patients with SCD. A modified (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) method was used to conduct a comprehensive review of the literature yielding 31 publications included in this review. Three connected, yet distinct areas of focus were identified: (1) providers' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of patients with SCD; (2) providers' perceived or true barriers to caring for patients with SCD; and (3) interventions to improve providers' attitudes, perceptions, and care of patients with SCD. In each area of focus, research has evolved over time. Also included in this integrative review is a synthesis of measurement instruments used to assess provider knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and perceived and true barriers to caring for patients with SCD. Adolescents with SCD who are transitioning from pediatric to adult care are at a particularly high risk for morbidity and mortality, so this review focused on the many opportunities that exist to advance the healthcare for young adults with SCD to improve patient outcomes later in life. This includes improving providers' knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes, and lessening the real or perceived barriers to care for patients with SCD.

Structural violence: An evolutionary concept analysis

AIMS

To enhance conceptual clarity and interdisciplinary understanding of structural violence, and to illuminate its implications for contemporary social justice and health equity research, by: (1) synthesizing scholarly literature pertaining to structural violence and health; (2) defining its key attributes, antecedents, consequences and characteristics; (3) contextually situating this phenomenon over time and across disciplines.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review of scholarly health literature pertaining to 'structural violence' or its surrogate term 'structural determinants of health' was guided by a Research and Education Librarian.

DATA SOURCES

In November 2019 and again in April 2021, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles that described structural violence in the context of health. Of the 238 unique records identified, 32 articles were selected for inclusion and comprise the review sample.

REVIEW METHODS

Using Beth Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method, articles were comparatively analysed to identify key attributes, antecedents and consequences associated with the concept's use in health research.

RESULTS

The five interrelated attributes characterizing structural violence are: power, marginality, oppression, adversity and trauma. Hegemonic social, cultural, economic and political systems serve as antecedents, whilst the consequences of structural violence can be broadly classified as health inequity, injustice and indignity, and social disorganization.

CONCLUSION

This analysis contributes to conceptual clarity and mutual understanding of the usage, application and significance of structural violence across health disciplines and provides a strong foundation for continued concept development and operationalization. Further research is needed to substantiate the relationship between structural violence and health inequity.

The Meaning of Informed Consent: Genome Editing Clinical Trials for Sickle Cell Disease

BACKGROUND

A first therapeutic target of somatic genome editing (SGE) is sickle cell disease (SCD), the most commonly inherited blood disorders, affecting more than 100,000 individuals in the United States. Advancement of SGE is contingent on patient participation in first in human clinical trials. However, seriously ill patients may be vulnerable to overestimating the benefits of early phase studies while underestimating the risks. Therefore, ensuring potential clinical trial participants are fully informed prior to participating in a SGE clinical trial is critical. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults with SCD as well as parents and physicians of individuals with SCD. Participants were asked to complete a genetic literacy survey, watch an educational video about genome editing, complete a two-part survey, and take part in focus group discussions. Focus groups addressed topics on clinical trials, ethics of gene editing, and what is not understood regarding gene editing. All focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using conventional content analysis techniques to identify major themes. Results: Our study examined the views of SCD stakeholders regarding what they want and need to know about genome editing to make an informed decision to participate in a SGE clinical trial. Prominent themes included stakeholders' desire to understand treatment side effects, mechanism of action of SGE, trial qualification criteria, and the impact of SGE on quality of life. In addition, some physicians expressed concerns about the extent to which their patients would understand concepts related to SGE; however, individuals with SCD demonstrated higher levels of genetic literacy than estimated by physicians. Conclusions: Designing ethically robust genome editing clinical trials for the SCD population will require, at a minimum, addressing the expressed information needs of the community through culturally sensitive engagement, so that they can make informed decisions to consider participation in clinical trials.