A potential pitfall in provider assessments of the quality of asthma control

Parent Perceptions of a Validated Asthma Questionnaire in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

While a number asthma questionnaires have been validated, most have not been used in an emergency department (ED) setting, nor evaluated patient feedback or clinical benefit. We sought to evaluate parent feedback on an asthma questionnaire used in an ED setting.

METHODS

We recruited parents of children 2-17 years old presenting to a tertiary pediatric ED for asthma care. Parents first completed then rated the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI-ED).

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-four parents (84%) completed surveys. Approximately two-thirds were Latinx, and 82% completed high school. Ninety-three percent of children had uncontrolled asthma. Parents endorsed the PACCI-ED: as easy to answer (94%); useful in understanding their child's asthma (83%); used the right words to describe their child's condition (95%); and would help the ED physician (93%) and primary care provider (PCP) (89%) better understand their child's asthma. Eleven percent reported that the PACCI-ED interfered with ED care. Parents with lower health literacy were more likely to agree the PACCI-ED asked more complete questions about their child's asthma than the ED physician (64% vs 45%, P = .02). Parents of children with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to agree that the PACCI-ED should become part of regular ED care (88% vs 62%, P = .02). Parents were more likely to agree that the PACCI-ED would help their PCP understand their child's asthma if they had a lower income (92% vs 50%, P < .001), less education (100% vs 88%, P = .004), were Latinx (94% vs 83%, P = .006), or were not using controller medication (93% vs 83%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Parents endorse an asthma questionnaire as valuable during an ED encounter. Because it is endorsed to be valuable to parents, this questionnaire could be used to facilitate patient-centered asthma care.

A digital health application for managing pediatric asthma: Use and benefits

Childhood asthma is a common and serious chronic lung disease. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies may assist clinical providers, caregivers, and children in managing pediatric asthma. This study evaluated the Nemours app, an mHealth application. We examined: a) frequency of data access by providers and feature use by caregivers (parents/legal guardians) of 5-11-year-old children diagnosed with asthma and b) whether utilization was related to benefits. Nine providers (allergists/pulmonologists) and 80 patient-families (caregiver/child dyads) participated. Two-years of retrospective data were obtained for asthma control, in-person urgent healthcare utilization, and app utilization. Six-months of prospective data included asthma control, in-person urgent healthcare utilization, app utilization, surveys, and health literacy screeners. Providers (56%) accessed app data and caregivers (61%) utilized the app. Caregiver use of messaging feature predicted gains in health literacy scores (b = .44, p = .041), suggesting app use may offer some educational benefits. Implementation of strategies that support app engagement and utilization may help to maximize intended benefits.

Use of the composite asthma severity index in a pediatric subspecialty clinic

BACKGROUND

The Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI) is a comprehensive tool to assess asthma severity, which has been applied in the research setting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in an outpatient setting, whether a CASI score accurately predicts asthma severity or control as determined by means of subspecialist assessment. Asthma Control Test (ACT) and childhood ACT (C-ACT) scores were generated to provide additional context for CASI scores in relationship to assessments using another clinical tool.

METHODS

Children aged 5 to 18 years with a physician diagnosis of persistent asthma were recruited from a tertiary care center. A pediatric pulmonologist made determinations on each participant's asthma severity and control during a clinic visit. A CASI and ACT/C-ACT score was generated for each patient. Logistic regression and Spearman correlations were used to determine how well CASI scores predicted physician assessments. Agreement between ACT/C-ACT scores and physician assessment of asthma control was determined in supplemental analyses.

RESULTS

CASI scores strongly predicted physician assessment of severity (Spearman correlation = 0.61, P < .001); unadjusted odds ratio (OR) equal to 36.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.83-152.34); and adjusted OR equal to 32.76 (95% CI: 85.70-188.44). In supplemental analyses, ACT/C-ACT scores strongly predicted physician assessment of control (Spearman correlation = 0.72, P < .001) with an unadjusted OR equal to 42.12 (95% CI: 13.34-133.00) and adjusted OR equal to 55.34 (95% CI: 13.62-224.89).

CONCLUSION

Use of the CASI was feasible and accurately predicted physician assessments of asthma severity and control in this sample, which are not distinct entities. The CASI is a robust tool that may be used successfully in ambulatory pediatric asthma care.

Asthma specialist care preferences among parents of children receiving emergency department care for asthma

Objective: To learn factors associated with desire for asthma specialist care among parents of children seeking emergency department (ED) care for asthma, and if referral was indicated based on national asthma guidelines. Methods: We surveyed parents of children ages 0-18 years seeking pediatric ED asthma care, then comparisons were made according to parental level of interest in asthma specialist care, with regard to socio-demographics, asthma morbidity and care, by chi-squared and logistic regression. Results: Of 149 children, 20% reported specialist care, but 75% met guideline criteria for referral. About 80% of parents not seeing an asthma specialist expressed a desire to see one. Higher rates of prior urgent care visits (48% vs. 22%, p = 0.03), ED visits (82% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and oral steroid use (53% vs. 22%, p = 0.009) were reported by parents who desired an asthma specialist compared with parents who did not. 87% of parents not seeing a specialist attributed this to a perceived lack of necessity by their primary care provider. An ED visit within the prior 12 months was the most significant predictor in parental desire for specialist care (odds ratio 9.75; 95% CI 3.42-27.76) in adjusted logistic regression models. Conclusion: High rates of parental preference for asthma specialist care suggest that directly querying parents may be an efficient method to identify children appropriate for specialist care in the ED.

Impact of shared decision making on asthma quality of life and asthma control among children

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have examined the effectiveness of shared decision making (SDM) in clinical practice. This study evaluated the impact of SDM on quality of life and symptom control in children with asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective 3-year study in six community-based practices serving a low-income patient population. Practices received training on SDM using an evidence-based toolkit. Patients aged 2-17 with a diagnosis of asthma were identified from scheduling and billing data. At approximate 6-month intervals, patients completed a survey consisting of the Mini Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (range 1-7) and the control domain of the Pediatric Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (range 0-7). We used propensity scores to match 46 children receiving SDM to 46 children receiving usual care with decision support. Included children had completed a baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey. Random coefficient models incorporated repeated measures to assess the effect of SDM on asthma quality of life and asthma control.

RESULTS

The sample was primarily of non-White patients (94.6%) with Medicaid insurance (92.4%). Receipt of SDM using an evidence-based toolkit was associated with higher asthma quality of life [mean difference 0.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.4] and fewer asthma control problems (mean difference -0.9; 95% CI -1.6--0.2) compared to usual care with decision support.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of SDM within clinical practices using a standardized toolkit is associated with improved asthma quality of life and asthma control for low-income children with asthma when compared to usual care with decision support.

Caregiver education to promote appropriate use of preventive asthma medications: what is happening in primary care?

OBJECTIVE

To describe actions taken by providers at primary care visits to promote daily use of preventive asthma medication, and determine whether patient or encounter variables are associated with the receipt of asthma medication education.

METHODS

As part of a larger study in Rochester, NY, caregivers of children (2-12 years old) with asthma were approached before an office visit for well-child, asthma-specific or other illness care from October 2009 to January 2013. Eligibility required persistent symptoms and a prescription for an inhaled asthma controller medication. Caregivers were interviewed within two weeks to discuss the health care encounter.

RESULTS

We identified 185 eligible children from six urban primary care offices (27% Black, 38% Hispanic, 65% Medicaid). Overall, 42% of caregivers reported a discussion of appropriate preventive medication use, fewer than 25% received an asthma action plan, and 17% reported "ideal" medication education (both discussing proper medication use and completing an asthma action plan); no differences were seen upon comparing well-child and asthma-specific visits with other visits. Well-child and asthma-specific visits together were more likely, compared with other visits, to include a recommendation for a follow-up visit (43% versus 23%, p = 0.007). No patient factors were associated with report of preventive medication education.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-recommended education for caregivers about preventive-asthma medication is not occurring in the majority of primary care visits for urban children with symptomatic persistent asthma. Novel methods to deliver asthma education may be needed to promote appropriate preventive medication use and reduce asthma morbidity.

Asthma control questionnaires in the management of asthma in children: A review

Several self-administered questionnaires have been developed to assess childhood asthma control in a simple and standardized way. This review discusses the most commonly used questionnaires and explores their usefulness in asthma management in children. We conclude that the use of asthma control questionnaires in daily practice and in research contributes to the standardized evaluation of children with asthma and helps to track asthma symptoms, but validation studies in a wider range of settings are needed.

Disparities in assessments of asthma control between children, parents, and physicians

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of asthma control in children by physicians, patients and their parents was compared, assuming parents may underestimate symptoms in asthmatic children and exploring whether physicians tend to agree with them.

DESIGN

Asthma control perception was assessed in 4- to 11-year-old asthmatic children and their parents, using C-ACT, during 2011-2012. Pediatric pulmonologists used GINA guidelines for their assessment; pediatricians, not having spirometry, used the information given in addition to physical examination. The C-ACT scores given by the children and their parents were further analyzed separately, and compared with their physicians' assessment. Statistical methods, which also measured possible influence of different variables, included kappa, Chi-square, linear-by-linear association, McNemar test and logistic regression.

PATIENT SELECTION

The study comprised 354 parents and children aged 4-11 years with moderate-severe asthma; 129 (36.4%) were treated by 23 pediatricians; 225 (63.6%) by 11 pediatric pulmonologists.

RESULTS

The C-ACT was generally found valid in assessing asthma control (P < 0.001; κ 0.529; CI 0.441, 0.617) and showed that in 229/354 (53%) of children the asthma was uncontrolled. Nevertheless, of the 229 children who indicated their asthma was uncontrolled, 124 (54.1%) of their parents (κ 0.245; CI 0.15, 0.34) and 96 (41.9%) of their physicians believed it to be controlled (κ 0.331; 0.24, 0.43). Comparing the physician-child discordance vis-à-vis the parents, the significant difference was when 96/229 children (41.9%) and 34/126 parents (27.0%) indicated the asthma was uncontrolled while the physician determined it controlled (OR 1.95; 1.19, 3.24). There were no significant differences between pediatric pulmonologists and pediatricians.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to increasing awareness of parents to symptoms in their asthmatic children, physicians should question the child appropriately, as well as using the children's responses to C-ACT as an information source for properly assessing asthma control.

Genetic predictors associated with improvement of asthma symptoms in response to inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

To date, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) response in asthmatic patients have focused primarily on lung function and exacerbations.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that GWAS analysis could identify novel genetic markers predicting a symptomatic response to ICSs.

METHODS

We analyzed differences in asthma symptoms in response to ICSs in 124 white children from the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) trial using scores from diary cards. Of the 440,862 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) analyzed, the top 100 ranked SNPs were pursued for replication initially in subjects from the pediatric Childhood Asthma Research and Education trials (77 white children) and then in subjects from the adult Asthma Clinical Research Network (110 white adults) and Leukotriene Modifier or Corticosteroid or Corticosteroid-Salmeterol trials (110 white adults).

RESULTS

The lowest P value for GWAS analysis in the CAMP trial was 8.94 × 10(-8) (rs2388639). Of the 60 SNPs available in the Childhood Asthma Research and Education Network trials, rs1558726 (combined P = 1.02 × 10(-5)), rs2388639 (combined P = 8.56 × 10(-9)), and rs10044254 (combined P = 9.16 × 10(-8)) independently replicated. However, these 3 SNPs were not additionally replicated in the adult asthmatic patients of the remaining trials. rs10044254 lies in the intronic region of F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 7 (FBXL7) and is associated with decreased expression in immortalized B cells derived from CAMP participants.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified a novel SNP, rs10044254, associated with both decreased expression of FBXL7 and improved symptomatic response to ICSs in 2 independent pediatric cohorts. Our results suggest that there might be a specific genetic mechanism regulating symptomatic response to ICSs in children that does not carry over to adults.

Disagreement among common measures of asthma control in children

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a worldwide problem. It cannot be prevented or cured, but it is possible, at least in principle, to control asthma with modern management. Control usually is assessed by history of symptoms, physical examination, and measurement of lung function. A practical problem is that these measures of control may not be in agreement. The aim of this study was to describe agreement among different measures of asthma control in children.

METHODS

A prospective sequential sample of children aged 4 to 11 years with atopic asthma attending a routine follow-up evaluation were studied. Patients were assessed with the following four steps: (1) fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), (2) spirometry, (3) Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT), and (4) conventional clinical assessment by a pediatrician. The outcome for each test was coded as controlled or uncontrolled asthma. Agreement among measures was examined by cross-tabulation and κ statistics.

RESULTS

Eighty children were enrolled, and nine were excluded. Mean FENO in pediatrician-judged uncontrolled asthma was double that of controlled asthma (37 parts per billion vs 15 parts per billion, P < .005). There was disagreement among measures of control. Spirometric indices revealed some correlation, but of the unrelated comparisons, those that agreed with each other most often (69%) were clinical assessment by the pediatrician and the cACT. Worst agreement was noted for FENO and cACT (49.3%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, different measures to assess control of asthma showed a lack of agreement for all comparisons in this study.

The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument asthma questionnaire: for use in diverse children of all ages

BACKGROUND

National Institutes of Health asthma guidelines recommend questionnaires to assess asthma control, but these questionnaires are not useable across the entire pediatric age spectrum and have not been validated among significant numbers of minority or Spanish-speaking children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate a questionnaire designed to assess asthma control across a broad age range of minority and Spanish-speaking children cared for in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

Between July 1, 2007, and September 30, 2010, we collected information using the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI), the Asthma Control Test (ACT; or the childhood ACT for children 4-11 years old), the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire, and lung function and clinicians' ratings of asthma status among a population of children presenting for routine asthma specialist care. The PACCI measure of asthma control was validated by evaluating accuracy, internal reliability, and concurrent, discriminative, and known-groups validity.

RESULTS

We collected information on 265 English- and 52 Spanish-speaking children (mean age, 8.2 years; 58% male; 44% African American). Across all age groups and in both languages, PACCI control showed good internal reliability and strong concurrent, discriminative, and known-groups validity with ACT and Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire scores and clinicians' ratings of asthma control. The accuracy of the PACCI in classifying children with uncontrolled asthma was good (area under the curve, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

The PACCI accurately measures asthma control in English- and Spanish-speaking children. The PACCI should be useful to clinicians to assess and classify asthma according to National Institutes of Health asthma guidelines.

Four of a kind: asthma control, FEV1, FeNO, and psychosocial problems in adolescents

BACKGROUND

Many adolescents have poor asthma control and are at high risk for psychosocial problems. However, structured assessment of asthma control or psychosocial problems is still not implemented in routine asthma care. Pediatricians typically rely on their clinical view and physiological measurements. To date, it is unknown whether clinical and patient reported outcomes are interrelated. Furthermore, there is no consensus on who should be the informant; the adolescent or his caregiver. STUDY AIM(S): This study aimed to assess the relationship between patient and caregiver reported outcomes [Asthma Control Questionnaire and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)] and physiological parameters (FEV1 and Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide) in adolescents (aged 11-16) with asthma.

METHODS

A multicenter observational study was performed in four Dutch pediatric outpatient departments. Association between asthma control, physiological parameters, and results of psychosocial questionnaires completed by both adolescent and caregiver was analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight adolescents and their caregivers participated in this study. Asthma was uncontrolled in about 30%. Asthma control was not associated with age, gender, FEV1, FeNO, or psychosocial problems. Agreement between adolescents and caregivers about how well asthma was controlled was moderate (κ = 0.577, P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Asthma control, physiological parameters, and psychosocial problems are different domains of health status. It could be suggested to use validated patient and caregiver reported outcomes in routine adolescent asthma care.

CONCLUSION

Patient and caregiver reported outcomes on asthma control and the presence of psychosocial problems add valuable, unique information to physiological parameters in adolescent asthma management.

Working toward a sustainable system of asthma care: development of the School-Based Preventive Asthma Care Technology (SB-PACT) trial

OBJECTIVE

We previously conducted the School-Based Asthma Therapy trial to improve adherence to national asthma guidelines for urban children through directly observed administration of preventive asthma medications in school. The trial successfully improved outcomes among these children; however, several factors limit its potential for dissemination. To enhance sustainability, we subsequently developed a new model of care using web-based guides for efficient communications and integration within school and community systems. This article describes the development of the School-Based Preventive Asthma Care Technology (SB-PACT) trial.

METHOD

We developed the SB-PACT web-based system based on stakeholder feedback, and conducted a pilot randomized trial with 100 children to establish its feasibility in facilitating preventive asthma care for high-risk children. The SB-PACT system represents a new model of care using web-based guides for asthma symptom screening, follow-up control assessments, and electronic communications with providers.

RESULT

We enrolled and successfully screened all children using the web-based system. Most providers used the electronic communication system without difficulty, and the majority of children in the intervention group received preventive medications through school as planned and dose adjustments as needed. Several challenges to implementation also were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

This program is designed to promote sustainability of school-based asthma care, reduce program costs, and ultimately succeed in a real-world setting. With further refinements, it has the potential to be implemented nationally in schools.

Comparison of asthma control criteria: importance of spirometry

AIMS

To compare the measurements of asthma control using Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Asthma Management Consensus Summary and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines composite indices with and without spirometry.

METHODS

Asthma control parameters were extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) of patients ≥6 years old at two primary care sites. Asthma control ratings calculated according to CTS and GINA criteria were compared.

RESULTS

Data were available from 113 visits by 93 patients, aged 6-85 years (38.7 ± 24.8; mean ± SD). The proportion of visits at which individuals' asthma was completely controlled was 22.1% for CTS symptoms only and 9.7% for CTS with spirometry (p < .01); and 17.7% versus 14.1% for GINA symptoms only versus symptoms with spirometry (p = .125).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma control ratings using GINA and CTS criteria are discordant in more than half of the patients deemed "in control" by at least one scale. Differences in the spirometry criterion threshold are primarily responsible for this discordance. Failure to include spirometry as part of the control index consistently overestimates asthma control and may underestimate future risk of exacerbations.

Home environmental factors associated with poor asthma control in Montreal children: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Home environmental exposures may aggravate asthma. Few population-based studies have investigated the relationship between asthma control in children and home environmental exposures.

OBJECTIVE

Identify home environmental exposures associated with poor control of asthma among asthmatic children less than 12 years of age in Montreal (Quebec, Canada).

METHODS

This cross-sectional population-based study used data from a respiratory health survey of Montreal children aged 6 months to 12 years conducted in 2006 (n = 7980). Asthma control was assessed (n = 980) using an adaptation of the Canadian asthma consensus report clinical parameters. Using log-binomial regression models, prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated to explore the relationship between inadequate control of asthma and environmental home exposures, including allergens, irritants, mold, and dampness indicators. Subjects with acceptable asthma control were compared with those with inadequate disease control.

RESULTS

Of 980 children with active asthma in the year prior to the survey, 36% met at least one of the five criteria as to poor control of their disease. The population's characteristics found to be related with a lack of asthma control were younger age, history of parental atopy, low maternal education level, foreign-born mothers, and tenant occupancy. After adjustments, children living along high-traffic density streets (PR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00-1.81) and those with their bedroom or residence at the basement level (PR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.66) were found to be at increased risk of poor asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal asthma control appears to be mostly associated with traffic, along with mold and moisture conditions, the latter being a more frequent exposure and therefore having a greater public health impact.

Motivation to quit smoking among parents of urban children with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with motivation to quit smoking among parents of urban children with asthma.

METHODS

We analyzed data from parents who smoke and had a child enrolled in the School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) trial. We assessed asthma symptoms, children's cotinine, and parent smoking behaviors. Motivation to quit smoking was assessed by a 10-point continuous measure (1, not at all motivated; 10, very motivated).

RESULTS

209 parents smoked (39% of sample), and children's mean cotinine was 2.48 ng/ml. Motivation to quit was on average 6.9, and 47% of parents scored >or=8 on the scale. Parents who believed their child's asthma was not under good control, and parents who strongly agreed their child's asthma symptoms would decrease if they stop smoking had higher motivation to quit compared to their counterparts (p<.05). In a multivariate analysis, parents who believed their child's asthma was not under control had more than twice the odds of reporting high motivation to quit.

CONCLUSION

Parents' perception of the risks of smoking to their child with asthma is associated with motivation to quit.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Raising awareness about the effect of smoking and quitting on children's asthma might increase motivation to quit among parents.

Make an M-PACT on asthma: rapid identification of persistent asthma symptoms in a pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a brief assessment instrument for persistent asthma symptoms in a pediatric emergency department (ED) population.

METHODS

Parents of children aged 1 to 18 years being discharged home after treatment for acute asthma in an urban children's hospital completed a 6-item screen for persistent symptoms that had been developed from national guidelines and previously validated. During a follow-up phone call 4 weeks after the ED visit, the instrument was repeated. An 8-item asthma-related quality-of-life (ARQOL) instrument was also administered at both times to assess construct validity. Item analysis assessed the performance of individual items and their combination versus the full instrument.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-three children were enrolled, and 361 patients (83%) had complete data. Sensitivity and predictive value were calculated for the full screen and combination of items in detecting persistent symptoms at baseline and follow-up. A 3-item version included symptoms with activity, symptoms at night, and need for rescue albuterol. This version was 96% sensitive (95% confidence interval, 92-99) for persistent symptoms compared with the 6-item screen, and 69% (95% confidence interval, 62-76) of the participants continued to report persistent symptoms 4 weeks after the visit. For both screens, subjects with persistent symptoms had significantly worse ARQOL score at baseline and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief screen can identify persistent symptoms in pediatric ED patients with good sensitivity compared with a longer instrument. Most of these patients will continue to report persistent symptoms and reduced ARQOL score 1 month after the ED visit and may be candidates for additional interventions in the ED to improve long-term asthma care.

Home use of albuterol for asthma exacerbations

BACKGROUND

To reduce symptoms and emergency department (ED) visits, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines recommend early treatment of acute asthma symptoms with albuterol and oral corticosteroids. Yet, ED visits for asthma are frequent and often occur several days after onset of increased symptoms, particularly for children from low-income, urban neighborhoods.

OBJECTIVES

To describe home use of albuterol and identify factors associated with appropriate albuterol use.

METHODS

A total of 114 caregivers in the intervention group of a randomized trial to reduce emergent care for low-income, urban children completed a structured telephone interview with an asthma nurse to evaluate home management of their child's acute asthma symptoms. Interviews lasted approximately 20 minutes and were conducted from November 5, 2003, through September 30, 2005. Albuterol use as reported by caregivers was categorized as appropriate or inappropriate based on NAEPP recommendations.

RESULTS

Albuterol use for worsening asthma symptoms was categorized as appropriate for only 68% of caregivers and was more likely if the children had an ED visit or hospitalization for asthma in the prior year. The remaining 32% of caregivers used albuterol inappropriately (overtreatment or undertreatment). Appropriate albuterol use was not associated with caregiver report of having an asthma action plan (AAP) or a recent primary care physician visit to discuss asthma maintenance care.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers reported that they would use albuterol to treat their child's worsening asthma symptoms, but many described inappropriate use. Detailed evaluation of proper albuterol use at home may provide insight into how health care professionals can better educate and support parents in their management of acute exacerbations and more effective use of AAPs.

Asthma self-assessment in a Medicaid population

BACKGROUND

Self-assessment of symptoms by patients with chronic conditions is an important element of disease management. A recent study in a commercially-insured population found that patients who received automated telephone calls for asthma self-assessment felt they benefitted from the calls. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of disease self-assessment in Medicaid populations. The goals of this study were to: (1) assess the feasibility of asthma self-assessment in a population predominantly insured by Medicaid, (2) study whether adding a gift card incentive increased completion of the self-assessment survey, and (3) evaluate how the self-assessment affected processes and outcomes of care.

METHODS

We studied adults and children aged 4 years and older who were insured by a Medicaid-focused managed care organization (MCO) in a pre- and post-intervention study. During the pre-incentive period, patients with computerized utilization data that met specific criteria for problematic asthma control were mailed the Asthma Control Test (ACT), a self-assessment survey, and asked to return it to the MCO. During the intervention period, patients were offered a $20 gift card for returning the completed ACT to the MCO. To evaluate clinical outcomes, we used computerized claims data to assess the number of hospitalization visits and emergency department visits experienced in the 3 months after receiving the ACT. To evaluate whether the self-management intervention improved processes of care, we conducted telephone interviews with patients who returned or did not return the ACT by mail.

RESULTS

During the pre-incentive period, 1183 patients were identified as having problems with asthma control; 25 (2.0%) of these returned the ACT to the MCO. In contrast, during the incentive period, 1612 patients were identified as having problems with asthma control and 87 (5.4%) of these returned the ACT to the MCO (p < 0.0001). Of all 95 ACTs that were returned, 87% had a score of 19 or less, which suggested poor asthma control.During the 3 months after they received the ACT, patients who completed it had similar numbers of outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for asthma as patients who did not complete the ACT. We completed interviews with 95 patients, including 28 who had completed the ACT and 67 who had not. Based on an ACT administered at the time of the interview, patients who had previously returned the ACT to the MCO had asthma control similar to those who had not (mean scores of 14.2 vs. 14.6, p = 0.70). Patients had similar rates of contacting their providers within the past 2 months whether they had completed the mailed ACT or not (71% vs. 76%, p = 0.57).

CONCLUSION

Mailing asthma self-assessment surveys to patients with poorly controlled asthma was not associated with better asthma-associated outcomes or processes of care in the Medicaid population studied. Adding a gift card incentive did not meaningfully increase response rates. Asthma disease management programs for Medicaid populations will most likely need to involve alternative strategies for engaging patients and their providers in managing their conditions.

Test for respiratory and asthma control in kids (TRACK): a caregiver-completed questionnaire for preschool-aged children

BACKGROUND

A validated questionnaire is needed to monitor respiratory control in preschool-aged children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop and validate a caregiver-completed questionnaire that measures respiratory control in young children.

METHODS

A 33-item questionnaire that included asthma impairment and risk items was administered to 486 caregivers of children aged younger than 5 years with a current, recent, or past history of respiratory symptoms. Stepwise regression was used to select a subset of items with the greatest discriminant validity in relation to guidelines-defined asthma control in a random two-thirds development sample. Reliability, validity, and ability to screen for respiratory control problems were tested in development and validation samples (remaining one-third sample).

RESULTS

The content of the 5 items selected, the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK), included frequency of respiratory symptoms (wheeze, cough, shortness of breath), activity limitation, and nighttime awakenings in the past 4 weeks; rescue medication use in the past 3 months; and oral corticosteroid use in the previous year. Reliability was greater than 0.70 in both samples. ANOVA showed that mean scores differed significantly (P < .001) in the expected direction across both samples for 3 levels of guidelines-based respiratory control, physician-recommended change in therapy, and symptom status. In the development and validation samples, screening analyses revealed areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 and 0.82, respectively; control status was correctly classified in 81% and 78% of cases.

CONCLUSION

TRACK is a valid, easy-to-administer, caregiver-completed questionnaire of respiratory control in preschool-aged children with symptoms consistent with asthma.

Socioeconomic, family, and pediatric practice factors that affect level of asthma control

BACKGROUND

Multiple issues play a role in the effective control of childhood asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors related to the level of asthma control in children receiving asthma care from community pediatricians.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data for 362 children participating in an intervention study to reduce asthma morbidity were collected by a telephone-administered questionnaire. Level of asthma control (well controlled, partially controlled, or poorly controlled) was derived from measures of recent impairment (symptoms, activity limitations, albuterol use) and the number of exacerbations in a 12-month period. Data also included demographic characteristics, asthma-related quality of life, pediatric management practices, and medication usage. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with poor asthma control and to explore the relationship between control and use of daily controller medications.

RESULTS

Asthma was well controlled for 24% of children, partially controlled for 20%, and poorly controlled for 56%. Medicaid insurance, the presence of another family member with asthma, and maternal employment outside the home were significant univariable factors associated with poor asthma control. Medicaid insurance had an independent association with poor control. Seventy-six percent of children were reported by parents as receiving a daily controller medication. Comparison of guideline recommended controller medication with current level of asthma control indicated that a higher step level of medication would have been appropriate for 74% of these children. Significantly lower overall quality-of-life scores were observed in both parents and children with poor control.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite substantial use of daily controller medication, children with asthma continue to experience poorly controlled asthma and reduced quality of life. Although Medicaid insurance and aspects of family structure are significant factors associated with poorly controlled asthma, attention to medication use and quality-of-life indicators may further reduce morbidity.

At what age do children start taking daily asthma medicines on their own?

OBJECTIVE

Use of daily controller medications is a critical task in management of persistent asthma. Study aims were to examine (1) the association between child age and extent of daily controller-medication responsibility in a sample aged 4 to 19 years, (2) parent, child, and disease predictors of child daily controller-medication responsibility and overall daily controller-medication adherence, and (3) the association between child daily controller-medication responsibility and overall daily controller-medication adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey of 351 parents of children who were prescribed daily controller medication. Children's mean age was 10.4 years; 61.5% were male, and 88.1% were white. Parents provided all data, including an estimate of the percentage of child and parent daily controller-medication responsibility. Daily controller-medication adherence was measured as parents' report of percentage of daily doses taken per doses prescribed in a typical week. We used multivariate linear regression to determine associations between parent race/ethnicity, education, income, number of dependents, child age, gender, years since diagnosis, parent perception of symptom severity and control, and dependent variables (child daily controller-medication responsibility and daily controller-medication adherence). We also examined associations between child daily controller-medication responsibility and daily controller-medication adherence.

RESULTS

Child daily controller-medication responsibility increased with age. By age 7, children had assumed, on average, almost 20% of daily controller-medication responsibility; by age 11, approximately 50%; by age 15, 75%; and by age 19, 100%. In multivariate models, child age and male gender remained significantly associated with child daily controller-medication responsibility, and child's age and parents' race/ethnicity remained significantly associated with daily controller-medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians may need to screen for child daily controller-medication management and include even young children when educating families on the use of asthma medications and other key asthma-management tasks.

Patient factors used by pediatricians to assign asthma treatment

OBJECTIVE

Although asthma is often inappropriately treated in children, little is known about what information pediatricians use to adjust asthma therapy. The purpose of this work was to assess the importance of various dimensions of patient asthma status as the basis of pediatrician treatment decisions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, random-sample survey, between November 2005 and May 2006, of 500 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics using standardized case vignettes. Vignettes varied in regard to (1) acute health care use (hospitalized 6 months ago), (2) bother (parent bothered by the child's asthma status), (3) control (frequency of symptoms and albuterol use), (4) direction (qualitative change in symptoms), and (5) wheezing during physical examination. Our primary outcome was the proportion of pediatricians who would adjust treatment in the presence or absence of these 5 factors.

RESULTS

Physicians used multiple dimensions of asthma status other than symptoms to determine treatment. Pediatricians were significantly more likely to increase treatment for a recently hospitalized patient (45% vs 18%), a bothered parent (67% vs 18%), poorly controlled symptoms (4-5 times per week; 100% vs 18%), or if there was wheezing on examination (45% vs 18%) compared with patients who only had well-controlled symptoms. Pediatricians were significantly less likely to decrease treatment for a child with well-controlled symptoms and recent hospitalization (28%), parents who reported being bothered (43%), or a child whose symptoms had worsened since the last doctor visit (10%) compared with children with well-controlled symptoms alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatricians treat asthma on the basis of multiple dimensions of asthma status, including hospitalization, bother, symptom frequency, direction, and wheezing but use these factors differently to increase and decrease treatment. Tools that systematically assess multiple dimensions of asthma may be useful to help further improve pediatric asthma care.

Symptom perception and functional morbidity across a 1-year follow-up in pediatric asthma

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between asthma symptom perception measured during a 5-6 week baseline and functional morbidity measured prospectively across a 1-year follow-up. Symptom perception was measured by comparing subjective ratings with peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)). We hypothesized that accurate symptom perception (ASP) would be associated with less functional morbidity. Participants consisted of 198 children with asthma ages 7-17 recruited from three sites. The children used a programmable electronic spirometer in the home setting to guess their PEFR prior to exhalation. Each "subjective" guess was classified as being in an ASP, dangerous symptom perception (DSP; underestimation of symptoms), or symptom magnification (SM; overestimation) zone based upon the corresponding measurement of PEFR or FEV(1). An index of functional morbidity was collected by parent report at baseline and across 1-year follow-up. A greater proportion of ASP blows and a lower proportion of DSP blows based on PEFR predicted less functional morbidity reported at baseline, independent of asthma severity and race/ethnicity. A greater proportion of ASP blows (using PEFR and FEV(1)) and a lower proportion of SM blows (using FEV(1)) predicted less functional morbidity across 1-year follow-up. Symptom perception was not associated with emergency department visits for asthma at baseline or across follow-up. In comparison to PEFR, FEV(1) more frequently detected a decline in pulmonary function that children did not report. Symptom perception measured in naturalistic settings was associated with functional morbidity at baseline and prospectively across 1-year follow-up. Support was found for including multiple measures of pulmonary function in the assessment of asthma symptom perception.

The impact of inadequately controlled asthma in urban children on quality of life and productivity

BACKGROUND

The burden of inadequately controlled pediatric asthma on education and other daily activities is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate asthma-related activity limitations and productivity losses among children and caregivers.

METHODS

Surveys were mailed to caregivers of children with asthma. Caregivers provided demographics, health-related quality of life (HRQL), workplace productivity, and asthma-related costs. Adolescents (aged 12-18 years) provided HRQL, asthma control, and school-based productivity, and young children (aged 4-11 years) completed an asthma control questionnaire with help from a caregiver.

RESULTS

Among the 239 respondents, the mean age was 10.1 years; 49% were girls. More than half were inadequately controlled as measured using the Asthma Control Test. Both HRQL and productivity were significantly lower in patients with inadequately controlled asthma compared with those with controlled asthma. In the previous year, caregivers reported missing 1.4 days of work due to their child's asthma, with the child missing an average of 4.1 school days. Fewer adolescents with controlled asthma reported missing 1 or more school days in the previous week compared with adolescents with inadequately controlled asthma (3.5% vs 34.0%; P < .001). There were similar differences in caregiver workdays missed and health care resource use: both were significantly higher in children with inadequately controlled asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequately controlled asthma has a significant impact on asthma-specific HRQL, school productivity and attendance, and work productivity of children and their caregivers.

Development and validation of an instrument to measure asthma symptom control in children

BACKGROUND

Few instruments exist to measure control of asthma symptoms in children. A brief instrument administered at healthcare visits could provide a more consistent approach to symptom recognition for patients and providers.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a Pediatric Asthma Control Tool to measure asthma symptom control at pediatric healthcare visits and evaluate the instrument compared to expert assessment and an asthma-related quality-of-life (QOL) measure.

DESIGN/METHOD

A preliminary 14-item instrument was generated through a process of literature review, meetings of institutional experts, and focus groups of parents and providers. The preliminary survey measured asthma control over the past 3 months in 2 domains: frequency of asthma flares and presence of symptoms when the child was at their best. Persistent symptoms were categorized according to published national asthma guidelines (NAEPP). The instrument and an asthma-related QOL measure were administered in the waiting room before a specialist visit for asthma. After the visit the specialist independently assessed asthma control in both domains on a 7-point Likert scale. Internal consistency and assessments of criterion and construct validity were calculated using standard statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 200 subjects ranging from 1 to 18 years of age and their caregivers were enrolled; 60% were male. During the prior 3 months, 19% had an emergency visit and 24% described persistent asthma symptoms. After item review the instrument was shortened to five items each for frequency of flares and symptoms at best. Internal consistency was high for each of these domains (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81/0.83, respectively). Correlation of each domain was good when compared to expert assessment (r = 0.54/0.59) and QOL (r = 0.61/0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Responses to a 10-item instrument to measure control of asthma symptoms in children at a healthcare visit demonstrated internal consistency and criterion and construct validity.

Targeted interventions for difficult-to-treat asthma

Chronic persistent asthma has a significant burden in terms of healthcare-related expenses, decreased productivity and reduced quality of life for patients. Currently available guideline-directed therapy can control the majority of patients, but roughly one-third of patients will require additional care. This article reviews the barriers that hinder the ability of practitioners and patients to gain and maintain control of asthma, including inaccurate assessment measures, variability in patient response, and poor adherence. Strategies aimed at controlling difficult-to-treat disease, such as the use of biomarkers to assess control, are discussed. Newer and developing therapies that cater to specific types of asthmatic patients and may lead to improved outcomes in those patients for whom standard care is insufficient are also looked at.

Is there a best outcome measurement for patients with asthma?

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the outcomes used to evaluate inhaled corticosteroid intervention in terms of the Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) model and to discuss the value of this more comprehensive approach in assessing therapeutic efficacy in asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant articles were identified by a search of the PubMed database for English-language articles published from 1991 to 2006 and references identified from bibliographies of relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION

The author's expert opinion was used to select studies for inclusion in this review.

RESULTS

Studies that assessed therapeutic effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma have traditionally focused on clinical indicators of treatment effect, including pulmonary function and symptoms. However, reliance on clinical indicators alone may not represent the full effect of the treatment on patients with asthma. The ECHO model is proposed as a more comprehensive and useful alternative to evaluate therapeutic effectiveness in patients with asthma. The model takes into account more recent concerns of patients and health care practitioners, including quality of life and treatment cost. Clinical studies using various ECHO outcomes are presented and the limitations of using individual outcomes are discussed. The Pediatric Asthma Episodes of Care Program, which exemplifies successful application of the ECHO model in the real-world setting, is also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The more comprehensive approach to determining therapeutic effectiveness in asthma provided by the ECHO model should enable optimization of asthma treatment, with limited health care resources.

Quantifying preventive asthma care delivered at office visits: the Preventive Asthma Care-Composite Index (PAC-CI)

Our objective was to develop a composite index to measure and quantify preventive asthma care delivered in the primary care office. We documented preventive actions used for children with asthma at the time of an office visit and weighted actions based on their intensity to create a composite index. The usefulness of the index was supported by significant correlations with several measures of symptom severity. The composite index also varied by visit type, with the highest scores noted for asthma-related visits, compared to well-child and other illness visits. This composite index has potential use for research and quality improvement efforts.

Symptom reporting in childhood asthma: a comparison of assessment methods

BACKGROUND

One barrier to receiving adequate asthma care is inaccurate estimations of symptom severity.

AIMS

To interview parents of children with asthma in order to: (1) describe the range of reported illness severity using three unstructured methods of assessment; (2) determine which assessment method is least likely to result in a "critical error" that could adversely influence the child's care; and (3) determine whether the likelihood of making a "critical error" varies by sociodemographic characteristics.

METHODS

A total of 228 parents of children with asthma participated. Clinical status was evaluated using structured questions reflecting National Asthma Education and Prevention Panel (NAEPP) criteria. Unstructured assessments of severity were determined using a visual analogue scale (VAS), a categorical assessment of severity, and a Likert scale assessment of asthma control. A "critical error" was defined as a parent report of symptoms in the lower 50th centile for each method of assessment for children with moderate-severe persistent symptoms by NAEPP criteria.

RESULTS

Children with higher severity according to NAEPP criteria were rated on each unstructured assessment as more symptomatic compared to those with less severe symptoms. However, among the children with moderate-severe persistent symptoms, many parents made a critical error and rated children in the lower 50th centile using the VAS (41%), the categorical assessment (45%), and the control assessment (67%). The likelihood of parents making a critical error did not vary by sociodemographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the unstructured assessment methods tested yielded underestimations of severity that could adversely influence treatment decisions. Specific symptom questions are needed for accurate severity assessments.

Symptom profile and asthma control in school-aged children

BACKGROUND

Children with poorly controlled asthma are at high risk of airway remodeling, sleep disruption, school absenteeism, and limited participation in activities.

OBJECTIVE

To determine asthma prevalence and characterize disease severity and burden in school-aged children.

METHOD

A case-finding study was conducted via a multiple-choice questionnaire and asthma algorithm. Items used for analysis include physician diagnosis of asthma, symptom severity, and health care utilization. The chi2 test was used to determine the significance of differences among cases. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of patient factors and asthma indicators.

RESULTS

Of the 5,417 children surveyed, 1,341 (25%) were classified as being at risk of asthma. Of these asthma cases, 55% were positive by diagnosis and algorithm (active), 10% were positive per algorithm alone (suspected), and 35% were positive per diagnosis alone (nonactive). Only 14% of all asthma cases reported experiencing no respiratory symptoms (< 1% active, 2% suspected, and 40% nonactive) compared with 75% of noncases. Also, 75% of noncases reported never missing school compared with 19%, 33%, and 54% of active, suspected, and nonactive asthma cases. African American race, Medicaid enrollment, and male sex were independent predictors of asthma risk. Similarly, African American race, Medicaid enrollment, age, and persistent asthma were independent predictors of emergency department use among asthma cases.

DISCUSSION

Prevalence of active symptoms suggestive of poor asthma control was extremely high among urban, minority children enrolled in Arkansas' largest public school district. Poor asthma control greatly affects quality of life, including school attendance and performance. Interventions should raise expectations and emphasize the importance of achieving asthma control.

Disease control in asthmatic children seen in private practice in Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood disease in Switzerland with a prevalence of 10%. Asthma has a high economic burden accounting for high medical costs. Assessment of disease control is likely to be of help in the implementation of strategies to improve asthma. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate asthma control and therapy regimens among children in private practice.

METHODS

We assessed asthma control as well as therapy regimens in 575 asthmatic children in an experience programme in Switzerland by using an abbreviated questionnaire based on the asthma control questionnaire and the child health questionnaire on Visit 1 and Visit 2.

RESULTS

Good asthma control at Visit 1 was only present in 25.7% of asthmatic children. Occasional asthma symptoms, limitation of physical activity, nocturnal awakening and anxiety of the parent was present in 80.5%, 41.2%, 46.8% and 57% of the children, respectively. After adjustment of therapy regimens at Visit 1, mainly by adding a leukotriene receptor antagonist, asthma control was reported to be much better in 53.4% of the children at Visit 2.

CONCLUSIONS

As asthma control is inadequately achieved within a major portion of asthmatic children, it is imperative to find measures to improve asthma control and hence, to reduce the burden of disease.

Assessment of asthma severity and asthma control in children

National and international guidelines for asthma recommend the assessment and documentation of severity as the basis for patient management. However, studies show that there are problems with application of the severity assessment to children in clinical practice. More recently, asthma control has been introduced as a method to assess the adequacy of current treatment and inform asthma management. In this article we review the application and limitations of the severity assessment and the asthma-control tools that have been tested for use in children. A system of using asthma severity for disease assessment in the absence of treatment and using asthma-control assessment to guide management decisions while a child is receiving treatment appears to be a promising approach to tailor treatment to improve care and outcomes for children with asthma.

Poor asthma control in children: evidence from epidemiological surveys and implications for clinical practice

The objectives of this study is to compile current knowledge about asthma control in children in relation to goals proposed in international guidelines, to elucidate the factors associated with insufficient asthma control and to address the implications for clinical practice. Review of recent worldwide large population epidemiological surveys and clinical asthma studies of more than 20,000 children are the methods used in this study. The studies report high frequencies of sleep disturbances, emergency visits, school absence and limitations of physical activity due to asthma. Only a small percentage of children with asthma reach the goals of good asthma control set out by Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). There is evidence of underuse of inhaled corticosteroids even in children with moderate or severe persistent asthma and over-reliance on short-acting beta(2)-agonist rescue medication. Both parents and physicians generally overestimate asthma control and have low expectations about the level of achievable control. Many children with asthma are not being managed in accordance with guideline recommendations, and asthma management practices vary widely between countries. Asthma control falls short of guideline recommendations in large proportions of children with asthma worldwide. Simple methods for assessing asthma control in clinical practice are needed. Treatment goals based on raised expectations should be established in partnership with the asthmatic child and the parents. Effective anti-inflammatory treatment should be used more frequently, and patients should be reviewed regularly.

Improved asthma care after enrollment in the State Children's Health Insurance Program in New York

BACKGROUND

Uninsured children with asthma are known to face barriers to asthma care, but little is known about the impact of health insurance on asthma care.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the impact of New York's State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) on health care for children with asthma.

DESIGN

Parents of a stratified random sample of new enrollees in New York's SCHIP were interviewed by telephone shortly after enrollment (baseline, n = 2644 [74% of eligible children]) and 1 year later (follow-up, n = 2310 [87%]). Asthma was defined by parent report using questions based on National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria. A comparison group (n = 401) who enrolled in SCHIP 1 year later was interviewed as a test for secular trends.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Access (having a usual source of care [USC], unmet health needs, problems receiving acute asthma care), asthma-related medical visits, quality (continuity of care at the USC, problems receiving chronic asthma care, use of antiinflammatory medications), and asthma outcomes (change in asthma care or severity) were the main outcome measures used. Bivariate and multivariate analyses compared measures at baseline (year before SCHIP) versus follow-up (year during SCHIP).

RESULTS

Three-hundred eighty-three children (14%) had asthma at baseline, and 364 had asthma at follow-up (16%). No secular trends were detected between the baseline study group and the comparison group. After enrollment in SCHIP, improvements were noted in access: lacking a USC (decrease from 5% to 1%), unmet health needs (48% to 21%), and problems getting to the USC for asthma (13 to 4%). Children had fewer asthma-related attacks and medical visits after SCHIP (mean number of attacks: 9.5 to 3.8: mean number of asthma visits: 3.0 to 1.5; hospitalizations: 11% to 3%). Quality of asthma care improved for general measures (most/all visits to USC: 53% to 94%; mean rating of provider: 7.9 to 8.8 of 10) and asthma-specific measures (problems getting to the USC for asthma care when child was well: 13% to 1%). More than two thirds of the parents at follow-up reported that both quality of asthma care and asthma severity were "better or much better" than at baseline, generally because of insurance coverage or lower costs of medications and medical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Enrollment in New York's SCHIP was associated with improvements in access to asthma care, quality of asthma care, and asthma-specific outcomes. These findings suggest that health insurance improves the health of children with asthma.

The language of breathlessness: do families and health care providers speak the same language when describing asthma symptoms?

INTRODUCTION

Effective communication about symptoms is a critical prerequisite to appropriate treatment. Study aims were to: (a) document the symptoms that children with asthma and their parents associate with asthma, (b) identify differences between the "professional model "of asthma symptoms and the "lay model," (c) describe the family's proposed action in response to symptoms, and (d) investigate the congruence between parental assessment of "good control" and severity obtained using National Asthma Education and Prevention Program criteria.

METHOD

Children with asthma and their parents (N = 228) were recruited from diverse clinical practice sites. Parents and children described symptoms they associated with an asthma exacerbation and their proposed action. Perceived asthma control was compared with a structured assessment of severity.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six unique symptoms were reported. While 78% of parents reported at least one standard asthma symptom, 48% also reported nonstandard asthma symptoms. Sixty-five percent of parents whose children's symptoms were consistent with severe asthma reported "good control."

DISCUSSION

Improved communication about symptoms would improve asthma care. Proposed strategies include standardized screening questionnaires to assess symptoms, more frequent routine visits for children with persistent asthma, and wide dissemination of realistic goals for symptom control.

Asking the correct questions to assess asthma symptoms

A national survey of 896 parents of children with asthma was performed and responses to 2 types of inquiry were compared: global assessment versus specific assessment of symptoms. Almost all parents, 860 (96%), described their child's asthma as under "good control'' when asked a global assessment question. However, 306 (34%)-when asked specific questions-actually described poor asthma control with frequent symptoms. Medicaid insurance (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.44) and parental smoking (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.43) increased the likelihood that parents' responses would be at risk for misinterpretation. Increased education (OR 0.41: 95% CI: 0.18, 0.91) and English as the primary language (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.16, 0.96) were associated with decreased likelihood of misinterpretation. Vague, global assessment questions lead to incomplete clinical information and places the patient at risk for inadequate asthma therapy. A better approach is to use specific questions to determine the frequency of daytime or nighttime symptoms.