Data-driven brain network models differentiate variability across language tasks

Coarse graining and criticality in the human connectome

In the face of the stupefying complexity of the human brain, network analysis is a most useful tool that allows one to greatly simplify the problem, typically by approximating the billions of neurons making up the brain by means of a coarse-grained picture with a practicable number of nodes. But even such relatively small and coarse networks, such as the human connectome with its 100-1000 nodes, may present challenges for some computationally demanding analyses that are incapable of handling networks with more than a handful of nodes. With such applications in mind, we set out to study the extent to which dynamical behavior and critical phenomena in the brain may be preserved following a severe coarse-graining procedure. Thus we proceeded to further coarse grain the human connectome by taking a modularity-based approach, the goal being to produce a network of a relatively small number of modules. After finding that the qualitative dynamical behavior of the coarse-grained networks reflected that of the original networks, albeit to a less pronounced extent, we then formulated a hypothesis based on the coarse-grained networks in the context of criticality in the Wilson-Cowan and Ising models, and we verified the hypothesis, which connected a transition value of the former with the critical temperature of the latter, using the original networks. This preservation of dynamical and critical behavior following a severe coarse-graining procedure, in principle, allows for the drawing of similar qualitative conclusions by analyzing much smaller networks, which opens the door for studying the human connectome in contexts typically regarded as computationally intractable, such as Integrated Information Theory and quantum models of the human brain.

Task-relevant brain dynamics among cognitive subsystems induced by regional stimulation in a whole-brain computational model

Cognition involves the global integration of distributed brain regions that are known to work cohesively as cognitive subsystems during brain functioning. Empirical evidence has suggested that spatiotemporal phase relationships between brain regions, measured as synchronization and metastability, may encode important task-relevant information. However, it remains largely unknown how phase relationships aggregate at the level of cognitive subsystems under different cognitive processing. Here, we probe this question by simulating task-relevant brain dynamics through regional stimulation of a whole-brain dynamical network model operating in the resting-state dynamical regime. The model is constructed with structurally embedded Stuart-Laudon oscillators and then fitted with human resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Based on this framework, we first demonstrate the plausibility of introducing the cognitive system partition into the modeling analysis framework by showing that the clustering of regions across functional networks is better circumscribed by the predefined partition. At the cognitive subsystem level, we focus on how task-relevant phase dynamics are organized in terms of synchronization and metastability. We found that patterns of cognitive synchronization are more task specific, whereas patterns of cognitive metastability are more consistent across different states, suggesting it may encode a more task-general property during cognitive processing, an inherent property conferred by brain organization. This consistent network architecture in cognitive metastability may be related to the distinct functional responses of realistic cognitive systems. We also provide empirical evidence to partially support our computational results. Our paper may provide insights for the mechanisms underlying task-relevant brain dynamics, and establish a model-based link between brain structure, dynamics, and cognition, a fundamental step for computationally aided brain interventions.

Noise improves the association between effects of local stimulation and structural degree of brain networks

Stimulation to local areas remarkably affects brain activity patterns, which can be exploited to investigate neural bases of cognitive function and modify pathological brain statuses. There has been growing interest in exploring the fundamental action mechanisms of local stimulation. Nevertheless, how noise amplitude, an essential element in neural dynamics, influences stimulation-induced brain states remains unknown. Here, we systematically examine the effects of local stimulation by using a large-scale biophysical model under different combinations of noise amplitudes and stimulation sites. We demonstrate that noise amplitude nonlinearly and heterogeneously tunes the stimulation effects from both regional and network perspectives. Furthermore, by incorporating the role of the anatomical network, we show that the peak frequencies of unstimulated areas at different stimulation sites averaged across noise amplitudes are highly positively related to structural connectivity. Crucially, the association between the overall changes in functional connectivity as well as the alterations in the constraints imposed by structural connectivity with the structural degree of stimulation sites is nonmonotonically influenced by the noise amplitude, with the association increasing in specific noise amplitude ranges. Moreover, the impacts of local stimulation of cognitive systems depend on the complex interplay between the noise amplitude and average structural degree. Overall, this work provides theoretical insights into how noise amplitude and network structure jointly modulate brain dynamics during stimulation and introduces possibilities for better predicting and controlling stimulation outcomes.

Global excitability and network structure in the human brain

We utilize a model of Wilson-Cowan oscillators to investigate structure-function relationships in the human brain by means of simulations of the spontaneous dynamics of brain networks generated through human connectome data. This allows us to establish relationships between the global excitability of such networks and global structural network quantities for connectomes of two different sizes for a number of individual subjects. We compare the qualitative behavior of such correlations between biological networks and shuffled networks, the latter generated by shuffling the pairwise connectivities of the former while preserving their distribution. Our results point towards a remarkable propensity of the brain to achieve a trade-off between low network wiring cost and strong functionality, and highlight the unique capacity of brain network topologies to exhibit a strong transition from an inactive state to a globally excited one.

Within-subject reproducibility varies in multi-modal, longitudinal brain networks

Network neuroscience provides important insights into brain function by analyzing complex networks constructed from diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI), functional MRI (fMRI) and Electro/Magnetoencephalography (E/MEG) data. However, in order to ensure that results are reproducible, we need a better understanding of within- and between-subject variability over long periods of time. Here, we analyze a longitudinal, 8 session, multi-modal (dMRI, and simultaneous EEG-fMRI), and multiple task imaging data set. We first confirm that across all modalities, within-subject reproducibility is higher than between-subject reproducibility. We see high variability in the reproducibility of individual connections, but observe that in EEG-derived networks, during both rest and task, alpha-band connectivity is consistently more reproducible than connectivity in other frequency bands. Structural networks show a higher reliability than functional networks across network statistics, but synchronizability and eigenvector centrality are consistently less reliable than other network measures across all modalities. Finally, we find that structural dMRI networks outperform functional networks in their ability to identify individuals using a fingerprinting analysis. Our results highlight that functional networks likely reflect state-dependent variability not present in structural networks, and that the type of analysis should depend on whether or not one wants to take into account state-dependent fluctuations in connectivity.

Moving from phenomenological to predictive modelling: Progress and pitfalls of modelling brain stimulation in-silico

Brain stimulation is an increasingly popular neuromodulatory tool used in both clinical and research settings; however, the effects of brain stimulation, particularly those of non-invasive stimulation, are variable. This variability can be partially explained by an incomplete mechanistic understanding, coupled with a combinatorial explosion of possible stimulation parameters. Computational models constitute a useful tool to explore the vast sea of stimulation parameters and characterise their effects on brain activity. Yet the utility of modelling stimulation in-silico relies on its biophysical relevance, which needs to account for the dynamics of large and diverse neural populations and how underlying networks shape those collective dynamics. The large number of parameters to consider when constructing a model is no less than those needed to consider when planning empirical studies. This piece is centred on the application of phenomenological and biophysical models in non-invasive brain stimulation. We first introduce common forms of brain stimulation and computational models, and provide typical construction choices made when building phenomenological and biophysical models. Through the lens of four case studies, we provide an account of the questions these models can address, commonalities, and limitations across studies. We conclude by proposing future directions to fully realise the potential of computational models of brain stimulation for the design of personalized, efficient, and effective stimulation strategies.

Basins of attraction of chimera states on networks

Networks of identical coupled oscillators display a remarkable spatiotemporal pattern, the chimera state, where coherent oscillations coexist with incoherent ones. In this paper we show quantitatively in terms of basin stability that stable and breathing chimera states in the original two coupled networks typically have very small basins of attraction. In fact, the original system is dominated by periodic and quasi-periodic chimera states, in strong contrast to the model after reduction, which can not be uncovered by the Ott-Antonsen ansatz. Moreover, we demonstrate that the curve of the basin stability behaves bimodally after the system being subjected to even large perturbations. Finally, we investigate the emergence of chimera states in brain network, through inducing perturbations by stimulating brain regions. The emerged chimera states are quantified by Kuramoto order parameter and chimera index, and results show a weak and negative correlation between these two metrics.

Social cognitive network neuroscience

Over the past three decades, research from the field of social neuroscience has identified a constellation of brain regions that relate to social cognition. Although these studies have provided important insights into the specific neural regions underlying social behavior, they may overlook the broader neural context in which those regions and the interactions between them are embedded. Network neuroscience is an emerging discipline that focuses on modeling and analyzing brain networks-collections of interacting neural elements. Because human cognition requires integrating information across multiple brain regions and systems, we argue that a novel social cognitive network neuroscience approach-which leverages methods from the field of network neuroscience and graph theory-can advance our understanding of how brain systems give rise to social behavior. This review provides an overview of the field of network neuroscience, discusses studies that have leveraged this approach to advance social neuroscience research, highlights the potential contributions of social cognitive network neuroscience to understanding social behavior and provides suggested tools and resources for conducting network neuroscience research.

Brain network dynamics fingerprints are resilient to data heterogeneity

CONTEXT

Large multi-site neuroimaging datasets have significantly advanced our quest to understand brain-behavior relationships and to develop biomarkers of psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Yet, such data collections come at a cost, as the inevitable differences across samples may lead to biased or erroneous conclusions.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to validate the estimation of individual brain network dynamics fingerprints and appraise sources of variability in large resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) datasets by providing a novel point of view based on data-driven dynamical models.

APPROACH

Previous work has investigated this critical issue in terms of effects on static measures, such as functional connectivity and brain parcellations. Here, we utilize dynamical models (Hidden Markov models - HMM) to examine how diverse scanning factors in multi-site fMRI recordings affect our ability to infer the brain's spatiotemporal wandering between large-scale networks of activity. Specifically, we leverage a stable HMM trained on the Human Connectome Project (homogeneous) dataset, which we then apply to an heterogeneous dataset of traveling subjects scanned under a multitude of conditions.

MAIN RESULTS

Building upon this premise, we first replicate previous work on the emergence of non-random sequences of brain states. We next highlight how these time-varying brain activity patterns are robust subject-specific fingerprints. Finally, we suggest these fingerprints may be used to assess which scanning factors induce high variability in the data.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results demonstrate that we can i) use large scale dataset to train models that can be then used to interrogate subject-specific data, ii) recover the unique trajectories of brain activity changes in each individual, but also iii) urge caution as our ability to infer such patterns is affected by how, where and when we do so.

Path-dependent connectivity, not modularity, consistently predicts controllability of structural brain networks

The human brain displays rich communication dynamics that are thought to be particularly well-reflected in its marked community structure. Yet, the precise relationship between community structure in structural brain networks and the communication dynamics that can emerge therefrom is not well understood. In addition to offering insight into the structure-function relationship of networked systems, such an understanding is a critical step toward the ability to manipulate the brain's large-scale dynamical activity in a targeted manner. We investigate the role of community structure in the controllability of structural brain networks. At the region level, we find that certain network measures of community structure are sometimes statistically correlated with measures of linear controllability. However, we then demonstrate that this relationship depends on the distribution of network edge weights. We highlight the complexity of the relationship between community structure and controllability by performing numerical simulations using canonical graph models with varying mesoscale architectures and edge weight distributions. Finally, we demonstrate that weighted subgraph centrality, a measure rooted in the graph spectrum, and which captures higher order graph architecture, is a stronger and more consistent predictor of controllability. Our study contributes to an understanding of how the brain's diverse mesoscale structure supports transient communication dynamics.

Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook

Recent advances in computational models of signal propagation and routing in the human brain have underscored the critical role of white-matter structure. A complementary approach has utilized the framework of network control theory to better understand how white matter constrains the manner in which a region or set of regions can direct or control the activity of other regions. Despite the potential for both of these approaches to enhance our understanding of the role of network structure in brain function, little work has sought to understand the relations between them. Here, we seek to explicitly bridge computational models of communication and principles of network control in a conceptual review of the current literature. By drawing comparisons between communication and control models in terms of the level of abstraction, the dynamical complexity, the dependence on network attributes, and the interplay of multiple spatiotemporal scales, we highlight the convergence of and distinctions between the two frameworks. Based on the understanding of the intertwined nature of communication and control in human brain networks, this work provides an integrative perspective for the field and outlines exciting directions for future work.

Relations between large-scale brain connectivity and effects of regional stimulation depend on collective dynamical state

At the macroscale, the brain operates as a network of interconnected neuronal populations, which display coordinated rhythmic dynamics that support interareal communication. Understanding how stimulation of different brain areas impacts such activity is important for gaining basic insights into brain function and for further developing therapeutic neurmodulation. However, the complexity of brain structure and dynamics hinders predictions regarding the downstream effects of focal stimulation. More specifically, little is known about how the collective oscillatory regime of brain network activity—in concert with network structure—affects the outcomes of perturbations. Here, we combine human connectome data and biophysical modeling to begin filling these gaps. By tuning parameters that control collective system dynamics, we identify distinct states of simulated brain activity and investigate how the distributed effects of stimulation manifest at different dynamical working points. When baseline oscillations are weak, the stimulated area exhibits enhanced power and frequency, and due to network interactions, activity in this excited frequency band propagates to nearby regions. Notably, beyond these linear effects, we further find that focal stimulation causes more distributed modifications to interareal coherence in a band containing regions’ baseline oscillation frequencies. Importantly, depending on the dynamical state of the system, these broadband effects can be better predicted by functional rather than structural connectivity, emphasizing a complex interplay between anatomical organization, dynamics, and response to perturbation. In contrast, when the network operates in a regime of strong regional oscillations, stimulation causes only slight shifts in power and frequency, and structural connectivity becomes most predictive of stimulation-induced changes in network activity patterns. In sum, this work builds upon and extends previous computational studies investigating the impacts of stimulation, and underscores the fact that both the stimulation site, and, crucially, the regime of brain network dynamics, can influence the network-wide responses to local perturbations.

Stimulation can be used to alter brain activity and is a therapeutic option for certain neurological conditions. However, predicting the distributed effects of local perturbations is difficult. Previous studies show that responses to stimulation depend on anatomical (or structural) coupling. In addition to structure, here we consider how stimulation effects also depend on the brain’s collective dynamical (or functional) state, arising from the coordination of rhythmic activity across large-scale networks. In a whole-brain computational model, we show that global responses to regional stimulation can indeed be contingent upon and differ across various dynamical working points. Notably, depending on the network’s oscillatory regime, stimulation can accelerate the activity of the stimulated site, and lead to widespread effects at both the new, excited frequency, as well as in a much broader frequency range including areas’ baseline frequencies. While structural connectivity is a good predictor of “excited band” changes, in some states “baseline band” effects can be better predicted by functional connectivity, which depends upon the system’s oscillatory regime. By integrating and extending past efforts, our results thus indicate that dynamical—in additional to structural—brain organization plays a role in governing how focal stimulation modulates interactions between distributed network elements.

A two-layered brain network model and its chimera state

Based on the data of cerebral cortex, we present a two-layered brain network model of coupled neurons where the two layers represent the left and right hemispheres of cerebral cortex, respectively, and the links between the two layers represent the inter-couplings through the corpus callosum. By this model we show that abundant patterns of synchronization can be observed, especially the chimera state, depending on the parameters of system such as the coupling strengths and coupling phase. Further, we extend the model to a more general two-layered network to better understand the mechanism of the observed patterns, where each hemisphere of cerebral cortex is replaced by a highly clustered subnetwork. We find that the number of inter-couplings is another key parameter for the emergence of chimera states. Thus, the chimera states come from a matching between the structure parameters such as the number of inter-couplings and clustering coefficient etc and the dynamics parameters such as the intra-, inter-coupling strengths and coupling phase etc. A brief theoretical analysis is provided to explain the borderline of synchronization. These findings may provide helpful clues to understand the mechanism of brain functions.

Cognitive chimera states in human brain networks

The human brain is a complex dynamical system, and how cognition emerges from spatiotemporal patterns of regional brain activity remains an open question. As different regions dynamically interact to perform cognitive tasks, variable patterns of partial synchrony can be observed, forming chimera states. We propose that the spatial patterning of these states plays a fundamental role in the cognitive organization of the brain and present a cognitively informed, chimera-based framework to explore how large-scale brain architecture affects brain dynamics and function. Using personalized brain network models, we systematically study how regional brain stimulation produces different patterns of synchronization across predefined cognitive systems. We analyze these emergent patterns within our framework to understand the impact of subject-specific and region-specific structural variability on brain dynamics. Our results suggest a classification of cognitive systems into four groups with differing levels of subject and regional variability that reflect their different functional roles.