1
|
Saha D, Iannuccelli M, Brun C, Zanzoni A, Licata L. The Intricacy of the Viral-Human Protein Interaction Networks: Resources, Data, and Analyses. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:849781. [PMID: 35531299 PMCID: PMC9069133 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.849781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Viral infections are one of the major causes of human diseases that cause yearly millions of deaths and seriously threaten global health, as we have experienced with the COVID-19 pandemic. Numerous approaches have been adopted to understand viral diseases and develop pharmacological treatments. Among them, the study of virus-host protein-protein interactions is a powerful strategy to comprehend the molecular mechanisms employed by the virus to infect the host cells and to interact with their components. Experimental protein-protein interactions described in the scientific literature have been systematically captured into several molecular interaction databases. These data are organized in structured formats and can be easily downloaded by users to perform further bioinformatic and network studies. Network analysis of available virus-host interactomes allow us to understand how the host interactome is perturbed upon viral infection and what are the key host proteins targeted by the virus and the main cellular pathways that are subverted. In this review, we give an overview of publicly available viral-human protein-protein interactions resources and the community standards, curation rules and adopted ontologies. A description of the main virus-human interactome available is provided, together with the main network analyses that have been performed. We finally discuss the main limitations and future challenges to assess the quality and reliability of protein-protein interaction datasets and resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeya Saha
- Aix-Marseille Univ., Inserm, TAGC, UMR_S1090, Marseille, France
| | | | - Christine Brun
- Aix-Marseille Univ., Inserm, TAGC, UMR_S1090, Marseille, France
- CNRS, Marseille, France
| | - Andreas Zanzoni
- Aix-Marseille Univ., Inserm, TAGC, UMR_S1090, Marseille, France
- *Correspondence: Andreas Zanzoni,
| | - Luana Licata
- Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Luana Licata,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghadie M, Xia Y. Mutation Edgotype Drives Fitness Effect in Human. FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS 2021; 1:690769. [PMID: 36303776 PMCID: PMC9581054 DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2021.690769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Missense mutations are known to perturb protein-protein interaction networks (known as interactome networks) in different ways. However, it remains unknown how different interactome perturbation patterns (“edgotypes”) impact organismal fitness. Here, we estimate the fitness effect of missense mutations with different interactome perturbation patterns in human, by calculating the fractions of neutral and deleterious mutations that do not disrupt PPIs (“quasi-wild-type”), or disrupt PPIs either by disrupting the binding interface (“edgetic”) or by disrupting overall protein stability (“quasi-null”). We first map pathogenic mutations and common non-pathogenic mutations onto homology-based three-dimensional structural models of proteins and protein-protein interactions in human. Next, we perform structure-based calculations to classify each mutation as either quasi-wild-type, edgetic, or quasi-null. Using our predicted as well as experimentally determined interactome perturbation patterns, we estimate that >∼40% of quasi-wild-type mutations are effectively neutral and the remaining are mostly mildly deleterious, that >∼75% of edgetic mutations are only mildly deleterious, and that up to ∼75% of quasi-null mutations may be strongly detrimental. These estimates are the first such estimates of fitness effect for different network perturbation patterns in any interactome. Our results suggest that while mutations that do not disrupt the interactome tend to be effectively neutral, the majority of human PPIs are under strong purifying selection and the stability of most human proteins is essential to human life.
Collapse
|
3
|
Messina F, Montaldo C, Abbate I, Antonioli M, Bordoni V, Matusali G, Sacchi A, Giombini E, Fimia GM, Piacentini M, Capobianchi MR, Lauria FN, Ippolito G. Rationale and Criteria for a COVID-19 Model Framework. Viruses 2021; 13:1309. [PMID: 34372515 PMCID: PMC8309961 DOI: 10.3390/v13071309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Complex systems are inherently multilevel and multiscale systems. The infectious disease system is considered a complex system resulting from the interaction between three sub-systems (host, pathogen, and environment) organized into a hierarchical structure, ranging from the cellular to the macro-ecosystem level, with multiscales. Therefore, to describe infectious disease phenomena that change through time and space and at different scales, we built a model framework where infectious disease must be considered the set of biological responses of human hosts to pathogens, with biological pathways shared with other pathologies in an ecological interaction context. In this paper, we aimed to design a framework for building a disease model for COVID-19 based on current literature evidence. The model was set up by identifying the molecular pathophysiology related to the COVID-19 phenotypes, collecting the mechanistic knowledge scattered across scientific literature and bioinformatic databases, and integrating it using a logical/conceptual model systems biology. The model framework building process began from the results of a domain-based literature review regarding a multiomics approach to COVID-19. This evidence allowed us to define a framework of COVID-19 conceptual model and to report all concepts in a multilevel and multiscale structure. The same interdisciplinary working groups that carried out the scoping review were involved. The conclusive result is a conceptual method to design multiscale models of infectious diseases. The methodology, applied in this paper, is a set of partially ordered research and development activities that result in a COVID-19 multiscale model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Messina
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Chiara Montaldo
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Isabella Abbate
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Manuela Antonioli
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Veronica Bordoni
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Giulia Matusali
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Alessandra Sacchi
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Emanuela Giombini
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Gian Maria Fimia
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Piacentini
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
- Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Capobianchi
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Francesco Nicola Lauria
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | - Giuseppe Ippolito
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases, “Lazzaro Spallanzani”–IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (C.M.); (I.A.); (M.A.); (V.B.); (G.M.); (A.S.); (E.G.); (G.M.F.); (M.P.); (M.R.C.); (F.N.L.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Antiviral drugs have traditionally been developed by directly targeting essential viral components. However, this strategy often fails due to the rapid generation of drug-resistant viruses. Recent genome-wide approaches, such as those employing small interfering RNA (siRNA) or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) or those using small molecule chemical inhibitors targeting the cellular "kinome," have been used successfully to identify cellular factors that can support virus replication. Since some of these cellular factors are critical for virus replication, but are dispensable for the host, they can serve as novel targets for antiviral drug development. In addition, potentiation of immune responses, regulation of cytokine storms, and modulation of epigenetic changes upon virus infections are also feasible approaches to control infections. Because it is less likely that viruses will mutate to replace missing cellular functions, the chance of generating drug-resistant mutants with host-targeted inhibitor approaches is minimized. However, drug resistance against some host-directed agents can, in fact, occur under certain circumstances, such as long-term selection pressure of a host-directed antiviral agent that can allow the virus the opportunity to adapt to use an alternate host factor or to alter its affinity toward the target that confers resistance. This review describes novel approaches for antiviral drug development with a focus on host-directed therapies and the potential mechanisms that may account for the acquisition of antiviral drug resistance against host-directed agents.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lasso G, Mayer SV, Winkelmann ER, Chu T, Elliot O, Patino-Galindo JA, Park K, Rabadan R, Honig B, Shapira SD. A Structure-Informed Atlas of Human-Virus Interactions. Cell 2019; 178:1526-1541.e16. [PMID: 31474372 PMCID: PMC6736651 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
While knowledge of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is critical for understanding virus-host relationships, limitations on the scalability of high-throughput methods have hampered their identification beyond a number of well-studied viruses. Here, we implement an in silico computational framework (pathogen host interactome prediction using structure similarity [P-HIPSTer]) that employs structural information to predict ∼282,000 pan viral-human PPIs with an experimental validation rate of ∼76%. In addition to rediscovering known biology, P-HIPSTer has yielded a series of new findings: the discovery of shared and unique machinery employed across human-infecting viruses, a likely role for ZIKV-ESR1 interactions in modulating viral replication, the identification of PPIs that discriminate between human papilloma viruses (HPVs) with high and low oncogenic potential, and a structure-enabled history of evolutionary selective pressure imposed on the human proteome. Further, P-HIPSTer enables discovery of previously unappreciated cellular circuits that act on human-infecting viruses and provides insight into experimentally intractable viruses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gorka Lasso
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sandra V Mayer
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evandro R Winkelmann
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tim Chu
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Elliot
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kernyu Park
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raul Rabadan
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Barry Honig
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Sagi D Shapira
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|