1
|
González-Parra G, Mahmud MS, Kadelka C. Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models. Infect Dis Model 2024; 9:1057-1080. [PMID: 38988830 PMCID: PMC11233876 DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
As the world becomes ever more connected, the chance of pandemics increases as well. The recent COVID-19 pandemic and the concurrent global mass vaccine roll-out provides an ideal setting to learn from and refine our understanding of infectious disease models for better future preparedness. In this review, we systematically analyze and categorize mathematical models that have been developed to design optimal vaccine prioritization strategies of an initially limited vaccine. As older individuals are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, the focus is on models that take age explicitly into account. The lower mobility and activity level of older individuals gives rise to non-trivial trade-offs. Secondary research questions concern the optimal time interval between vaccine doses and spatial vaccine distribution. This review showcases the effect of various modeling assumptions on model outcomes. A solid understanding of these relationships yields better infectious disease models and thus public health decisions during the next pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilberto González-Parra
- Instituto de Matemática Multidisciplinar, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
- Department of Mathematics, New Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, 87801, NM, USA
| | - Md Shahriar Mahmud
- Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, 411 Morrill Rd, Ames, 50011, IA, USA
| | - Claus Kadelka
- Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, 411 Morrill Rd, Ames, 50011, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Alphen A, Lekkerkerker C, van Exel J, Baatenburg de Jong R, Ahaus K. Patients' perspectives on ethical principles to fairly allocate scarce surgical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a Q-methodology study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e086681. [PMID: 39313289 PMCID: PMC11429350 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare professionals were faced with prioritisation dilemmas due to limited surgical capacity. While the views of healthcare professionals on fair allocation have been given considerable attention, the views of patients have been overlooked. To address this imbalance, our study aimed to identify which ethical principles are most supported by patients regarding the fair allocation of surgical resources. DESIGN A Q-methodology study was conducted. Participants ranked ordered 20 statements covering different viewpoints on fair allocation according to their point of view, followed by an interview. Principal component analysis followed by varimax rotation was used to identify subgroups who broadly agreed in terms of their rankings. SETTING The setting of this study was in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 16 patient representatives were purposively sampled. RESULTS Two perspectives were identified, both of which supported utilitarianism. In perspective 1, labelled as 'clinical needs and outcomes', resource allocation should aim to maximise the health gains based on individual patient characteristics. In perspective 2, labelled as 'population outcomes and contribution to society', allocation should maximise health gains as with perspective 1, but this should also consider societal gains. CONCLUSIONS There was a broad agreement among patient representatives that utilitarianism should be the guiding ethical principle for fair allocation of scarce surgical resources. The insights gained from this study should be integrated into policymaking and prioritisation strategies in future healthcare crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk van Alphen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Lekkerkerker
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Ahaus
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Uribe-Carvajal R, Pelcastre-Villafuerte BE, Díaz-Castro L, Gómez-Dantés H. [Opportunities and challenges in vaccination implementation against COVID-19: A systematic review]. Aten Primaria 2024; 56:103047. [PMID: 39024921 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the experiences regarding the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies, emphasizing the opportunities and challenges identified during its implementation. DESIGN A systematic review of the literature published between 2020 and 2022. DATA SOURCES The study was conducted across four databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scielo, and Lilacs. SELECTION OF STUDIES Publications selection followed the PRISMA methodology (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis). DATA EXTRACTION A database was created where key elements of the selected study were identified and recorded, such as results, discussion, and conclusions. In addition, analysis categories were created such as: stages of the implementation plan, challenges identified and opportunity areas. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 292 publications were found, of which 25 were selected for analysis. Of these, 64% came from high-income countries and 32% from upper-middle-income countries. According to the stages of the implementation plan, 20% of the studies focused on regulations, planning and coordination; 28% in prioritization of the population to be vaccinated; 16% in acceptance, demand, and risk communication; and 16% in administration and information systems. Reflection on the response to the pandemic invites us to consider various aspects, such as the organization and function of health systems, the importance of collaborative work, efforts to achieve equity, communication strategies, as well as ethical dilemmas when seeking preserve health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebeca Uribe-Carvajal
- Centro de Investigación en Evaluación y Encuestas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| | | | - Lina Díaz-Castro
- Dirección de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Héctor Gómez-Dantés
- Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gonzalez-Parra G, Mahmud MS, Kadelka C. Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.03.04.24303726. [PMID: 38496570 PMCID: PMC10942533 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
As the world becomes ever more connected, the chance of pandemics increases as well. The recent COVID-19 pandemic and the concurrent global mass vaccine roll-out provides an ideal setting to learn from and refine our understanding of infectious disease models for better future preparedness. In this review, we systematically analyze and categorize mathematical models that have been developed to design optimal vaccine prioritization strategies of an initially limited vaccine. As older individuals are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, the focus is on models that take age explicitly into account. The lower mobility and activity level of older individuals gives rise to non-trivial trade-offs. Secondary research questions concern the optimal time interval between vaccine doses and spatial vaccine distribution. This review showcases the effect of various modeling assumptions on model outcomes. A solid understanding of these relationships yields better infectious disease models and thus public health decisions during the next pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilberto Gonzalez-Parra
- Instituto de Matemática Multidisciplinar, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
- Department of Mathematics, New Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, 87801, NM, USA
| | - Md Shahriar Mahmud
- Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, 411 Morrill Rd, Ames, 50011, IA, USA
| | - Claus Kadelka
- Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, 411 Morrill Rd, Ames, 50011, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boldea O, Alipoor A, Pei S, Shaman J, Rozhnova G. Age-specific transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 during the first 2 years of the pandemic. PNAS NEXUS 2024; 3:pgae024. [PMID: 38312225 PMCID: PMC10837015 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
During its first 2 years, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic manifested as multiple waves shaped by complex interactions between variants of concern, non-pharmaceutical interventions, and the immunological landscape of the population. Understanding how the age-specific epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 has evolved throughout the pandemic is crucial for informing policy decisions. In this article, we aimed to develop an inference-based modeling approach to reconstruct the burden of true infections and hospital admissions in children, adolescents, and adults over the seven waves of four variants (wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron BA.1) during the first 2 years of the pandemic, using the Netherlands as the motivating example. We find that reported cases are a considerable underestimate and a generally poor predictor of true infection burden, especially because case reporting differs by age. The contribution of children and adolescents to total infection and hospitalization burden increased with successive variants and was largest during the Omicron BA.1 period. However, the ratio of hospitalizations to infections decreased with each subsequent variant in all age categories. Before the Delta period, almost all infections were primary infections occurring in naive individuals. During the Delta and Omicron BA.1 periods, primary infections were common in children but relatively rare in adults who experienced either reinfections or breakthrough infections. Our approach can be used to understand age-specific epidemiology through successive waves in other countries where random community surveys uncovering true SARS-CoV-2 dynamics are absent but basic surveillance and statistics data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otilia Boldea
- Department of Econometrics and OR, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg 5037 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Amir Alipoor
- Department of Econometrics and OR, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg 5037 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Sen Pei
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Jeffrey Shaman
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
- Columbia Climate School, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
| | - Ganna Rozhnova
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
- Center for Complex Systems Studies (CCSS), Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CE, The Netherlands
- Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon PT1749-016, Portugal
- BioISI—Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon PT1749-016, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trejo I, Hung PY, Matrajt L. Covid19Vaxplorer: A free, online, user-friendly COVID-19 vaccine allocation comparison tool. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0002136. [PMID: 38252671 PMCID: PMC10802966 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
There are many COVID-19 vaccines currently available, however, Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) still have large proportions of their populations unvaccinated. Decision-makers must decide how to effectively allocate available vaccines (e.g. boosters or primary series vaccination, which age groups to target) but LMIC often lack the resources to undergo quantitative analyses of vaccine allocation, resulting in ad-hoc policies. We developed Covid19Vaxplorer (https://covid19vaxplorer.fredhutch.org/), a free, user-friendly online tool that simulates region-specific COVID-19 epidemics in conjunction with vaccination with the purpose of providing public health officials worldwide with a tool for vaccine allocation planning and comparison. We developed an age-structured mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and COVID-19 vaccination. The model considers vaccination with up to three different vaccine products, primary series and boosters. We simulated partial immunity derived from waning of natural infection and vaccination. The model is embedded in an online tool, Covid19Vaxplorer that was optimized for its ease of use. By prompting users to fill information through several windows to input local parameters (e.g. cumulative and current prevalence), epidemiological parameters (e.g basic reproduction number, current social distancing interventions), vaccine parameters (e.g. vaccine efficacy, duration of immunity) and vaccine allocation (both by age groups and by vaccination status). Covid19Vaxplorer connects the user to the mathematical model and simulates, in real time, region-specific epidemics. The tool then produces key outcomes including expected numbers of deaths, hospitalizations and cases, with the possibility of simulating several scenarios of vaccine allocation at once for a side-by-side comparison. We provide two usage examples of Covid19Vaxplorer for vaccine allocation in Haiti and Afghanistan, which had as of Spring 2023, 2% and 33% of their populations vaccinated, and show that for these particular examples, using available vaccine as primary series vaccinations prevents more deaths than using them as boosters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imelda Trejo
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Pei-Yao Hung
- Institute For Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Laura Matrajt
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Espinosa O, Mora L, Sanabria C, Ramos A, Rincón D, Bejarano V, Rodríguez J, Barrera N, Álvarez-Moreno C, Cortés J, Saavedra C, Robayo A, Franco OH. Predictive models for health outcomes due to SARS-CoV-2, including the effect of vaccination: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2024; 13:30. [PMID: 38229123 PMCID: PMC10790449 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02411-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interaction between modelers and policymakers is becoming more common due to the increase in computing speed seen in recent decades. The recent pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus was no exception. Thus, this study aims to identify and assess epidemiological mathematical models of SARS-CoV-2 applied to real-world data, including immunization for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). METHODOLOGY PubMed, JSTOR, medRxiv, LILACS, EconLit, and other databases were searched for studies employing epidemiological mathematical models of SARS-CoV-2 applied to real-world data. We summarized the information qualitatively, and each article included was assessed for bias risk using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PROBAST checklist tool. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022344542. FINDINGS In total, 5646 articles were retrieved, of which 411 were included. Most of the information was published in 2021. The countries with the highest number of studies were the United States, Canada, China, and the United Kingdom; no studies were found in low-income countries. The SEIR model (susceptible, exposed, infectious, and recovered) was the most frequently used approach, followed by agent-based modeling. Moreover, the most commonly used software were R, Matlab, and Python, with the most recurring health outcomes being death and recovery. According to the JBI assessment, 61.4% of articles were considered to have a low risk of bias. INTERPRETATION The utilization of mathematical models increased following the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Stakeholders have begun to incorporate these analytical tools more extensively into public policy, enabling the construction of various scenarios for public health. This contribution adds value to informed decision-making. Therefore, understanding their advancements, strengths, and limitations is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Espinosa
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS) & Economic Models and Quantitative Methods Research Group, Centro de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
| | - Laura Mora
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Cristian Sanabria
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Antonio Ramos
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS) & Economic Models and Quantitative Methods Research Group, Centro de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Duván Rincón
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Valeria Bejarano
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS) & Economic Models and Quantitative Methods Research Group, Centro de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Jhonathan Rodríguez
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS) & Economic Models and Quantitative Methods Research Group, Centro de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Nicolás Barrera
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Jorge Cortés
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Carlos Saavedra
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Adriana Robayo
- Directorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies in Health, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Oscar H Franco
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu H, Han X, Lin X, Zhu X, Wei Y. Impact of vaccine measures on the transmission dynamics of COVID-19. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290640. [PMID: 37624833 PMCID: PMC10464839 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
In many nations, efforts to prevent and control COVID-19 have been significantly impeded by the SARS-CoV-2 virus ongoing mutation. The Omicron strain, a more recent and prevalent strain, has had more significant detrimental effects in countries worldwide. To investigate the impact of the Omicron BA.2 strain on vaccine efficacy, we proposed a model with vaccination and immunological decline in this research. Then, we fitted our model based on the number of daily new instances reported by the government in Jilin and Shanghai, China. We estimated the effective reproduction number Re = 4.71 for the Jilin and Re = 3.32 for Shanghai. Additionally, we do sensitivity analysis to identify the critical factors affecting the effective reproduction number Re. It was found that vaccination rate, effectiveness rate, and declining rate had a significant effect on Re. Further, we investigate the relevant parameter thresholds that make Re lower than unity. Finally, rich numerical experiments were then carried out. We observed that even when vaccine efficiency was not high, increasing vaccination rates had a significant effect on early disease transmission, that limiting social distance was the most economical and rational measure to control the spread of disease, and that for a short period, reducing immune decline was not significant in curbing disease transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Liu
- School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xiaotao Han
- School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Xiaofen Lin
- School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xinjie Zhu
- School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yumei Wei
- Experimental Teaching Department, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Geubbels ELPE, Backer JA, Bakhshi-Raiez F, van der Beek RFHJ, van Benthem BHB, van den Boogaard J, Broekman EH, Dongelmans DA, Eggink D, van Gaalen RD, van Gageldonk A, Hahné S, Hajji K, Hofhuis A, van Hoek AJ, Kooijman MN, Kroneman A, Lodder W, van Rooijen M, Roorda W, Smorenburg N, Zwagemaker F, de Keizer NF, van Walle I, de Roda Husman AM, Ruijs C, van den Hof S. The daily updated Dutch national database on COVID-19 epidemiology, vaccination and sewage surveillance. Sci Data 2023; 10:469. [PMID: 37474530 PMCID: PMC10359398 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02232-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The Dutch national open database on COVID-19 has been incrementally expanded since its start on 30 April 2020 and now includes datasets on symptoms, tests performed, individual-level positive cases and deaths, cases and deaths among vulnerable populations, settings of transmission, hospital and ICU admissions, SARS-CoV-2 variants, viral loads in sewage, vaccinations and the effective reproduction number. This data is collected by municipal health services, laboratories, hospitals, sewage treatment plants, vaccination providers and citizens and is cleaned, analysed and published, mostly daily, by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) in the Netherlands, using automated scripts. Because these datasets cover the key aspects of the pandemic and are available at detailed geographical level, they are essential to gain a thorough understanding of the past and current COVID-19 epidemiology in the Netherlands. Future purposes of these datasets include country-level comparative analysis on the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 in different contexts, such as different cultural values or levels of socio-economic disparity, and studies on COVID-19 and weather factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E L P E Geubbels
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - J A Backer
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - F Bakhshi-Raiez
- National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R F H J van der Beek
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - B H B van Benthem
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - J van den Boogaard
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- The network of regional epidemiological consultants (REC), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - D A Dongelmans
- National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Eggink
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - R D van Gaalen
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - A van Gageldonk
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - S Hahné
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - K Hajji
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - A Hofhuis
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - A J van Hoek
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - M N Kooijman
- Centre of Information Services and CIO office, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - A Kroneman
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - W Lodder
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - M van Rooijen
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - W Roorda
- GGD GHOR Nederland, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Smorenburg
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - F Zwagemaker
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - N F de Keizer
- National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I van Walle
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - A M de Roda Husman
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - C Ruijs
- GGD GHOR Nederland, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S van den Hof
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gong J, Gujjula KR, Ntaimo L. An integrated chance constraints approach for optimal vaccination strategies under uncertainty for COVID-19. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES 2023; 87:101547. [PMID: 36845344 PMCID: PMC9942454 DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Despite concerted efforts by health authorities worldwide to contain COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has continued to spread and mutate into new variants with uncertain transmission characteristics. Therefore, there is a need for new data-driven models for determining optimal vaccination strategies that adapt to the new variants with their uncertain transmission characteristics. Motivated by this challenge, we derive an integrated chance constraints stochastic programming (ICC-SP) approach for finding vaccination strategies for epidemics that incorporates population demographics for any region of the world, uncertain disease transmission and vaccine efficacy. An optimal vaccination strategy specifies the proportion of individuals in a given household-type to vaccinate to bring the reproduction number to below one. The ICC-SP approach provides a quantitative method that allows to bound the expected excess of the reproduction number above one by an acceptable amount according to the decision-maker's level of risk. This new methodology involves a multi-community household based epidemiology model that uses census demographics data, vaccination status, age-related heterogeneity in disease susceptibility and infectivity, virus variants, and vaccine efficacy. The new methodology was tested on real data for seven neighboring counties in the United States state of Texas. The results are promising and show, among other findings, that vaccination strategies for controlling an outbreak should prioritize vaccinating certain household sizes as well as age groups with relatively high combined susceptibility and infectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangyue Gong
- Texas A&M University, Wm Michael Barnes '64 Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, 3131 TAMU, College Station, TX, 78743, USA
| | - Krishna Reddy Gujjula
- Texas A&M University, Wm Michael Barnes '64 Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, 3131 TAMU, College Station, TX, 78743, USA
| | - Lewis Ntaimo
- Texas A&M University, Wm Michael Barnes '64 Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, 3131 TAMU, College Station, TX, 78743, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roubenoff E, Feehan D, Mahmud AS. Evaluating primary and booster vaccination prioritization strategies for COVID-19 by age and high-contact employment status using data from contact surveys. Epidemics 2023; 43:100686. [PMID: 37167836 PMCID: PMC10155422 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The debate around vaccine prioritization for COVID-19 has revolved around balancing the benefits from: (1) the direct protection conferred by the vaccine amongst those at highest risk of severe disease outcomes, and (2) the indirect protection through vaccinating those that are at highest risk of being infected and of transmitting the virus. While adults aged 65+ are at highest risk for severe disease and death from COVID-19, essential service and other in-person workers with greater rates of contact may be at higher risk of acquiring and transmitting SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, there have been relatively little data available to understand heterogeneity in contact rates and risk across these demographic groups. Here, we retrospectively analyze and evaluate vaccination prioritization strategies by age and worker status. We use a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and uniquely detailed contact data collected as part of the Berkeley Interpersonal Contact Survey to evaluate five vaccination prioritization strategies: (1) prioritizing only adults over age 65, (2) prioritizing only high-contact workers, (3) splitting prioritization between adults 65+ and high-contact workers, (4) tiered prioritization of adults over age 65 followed by high-contact workers, and (5) tiered prioritization of high-contact workers followed by adults 65+. We find that for the primary two-dose vaccination schedule, assuming 70% uptake, a tiered roll-out that first prioritizes adults 65+ averts the most deaths (31% fewer deaths compared to a no-vaccination scenario) while a tiered roll-out that prioritizes high contact workers averts the most number of clinical infections (14% fewer clinical infections compared to a no-vaccination scenario). We also consider prioritization strategies for booster doses during a subsequent outbreak of a hypothetical new SARS-CoV-2 variant. We find that a tiered roll-out that prioritizes adults 65+ for booster doses consistently averts the most deaths, and it may also avert the most number of clinical cases depending on the epidemiology of the SARS-CoV-2 variant and the vaccine efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Roubenoff
- Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.
| | - Dennis Feehan
- Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
| | - Ayesha S Mahmud
- Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Penn MJ, Donnelly CA. Asymptotic Analysis of Optimal Vaccination Policies. Bull Math Biol 2023; 85:15. [PMID: 36662446 PMCID: PMC9859927 DOI: 10.1007/s11538-022-01114-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Targeted vaccination policies can have a significant impact on the number of infections and deaths in an epidemic. However, optimising such policies is complicated, and the resultant solution may be difficult to explain to policy-makers and to the public. The key novelty of this paper is a derivation of the leading-order optimal vaccination policy under multi-group susceptible-infected-recovered dynamics in two different cases. Firstly, it considers the case of a small vulnerable subgroup in a population and shows that (in the asymptotic limit) it is optimal to vaccinate this group first, regardless of the properties of the other groups. Then, it considers the case of a small vaccine supply and transforms the optimal vaccination problem into a simple knapsack problem by linearising the final size equations. Both of these cases are then explored further through numerical examples, which show that these solutions are also directly useful for realistic parameter values. Moreover, the findings of this paper give some general principles for optimal vaccination policies which will help policy-makers and the public to understand the reasoning behind optimal vaccination programs in more generic cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Penn
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, St Giles’, Oxford, OX1 3LB UK
| | - Christl A. Donnelly
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, St Giles’, Oxford, OX1 3LB UK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhu J, Wang Q, Huang M. Optimizing two-dose vaccine resource allocation to combat a pandemic in the context of limited supply: The case of COVID-19. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1129183. [PMID: 37168073 PMCID: PMC10166111 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The adequate vaccination is a promising solution to mitigate the enormous socio-economic costs of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and allow us to return to normal pre-pandemic activity patterns. However, the vaccine supply shortage will be inevitable during the early stage of the vaccine rollout. Public health authorities face a crucial challenge in allocating scarce vaccines to maximize the benefits of vaccination. In this paper, we study a multi-period two-dose vaccine allocation problem when the vaccine supply is highly limited. To address this problem, we constructed a novel age-structured compartmental model to capture COVID-19 transmission and formulated as a nonlinear programming (NLP) model to minimize the total number of deaths in the population. In the NLP model, we explicitly take into account the two-dose vaccination procedure and several important epidemiologic features of COVID-19, such as pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic transmission, as well as group heterogeneity in susceptibility, symptom rates, severity, etc. We validated the applicability of the proposed model using a real case of the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the Midlands of England. We conducted comparative studies to demonstrate the superiority of our method. Our numerical results show that prioritizing the allocation of vaccine resources to older age groups is a robust strategy to prevent more subsequent deaths. In addition, we show that releasing more vaccine doses for first-dose recipients could lead to a greater vaccination benefit than holding back second doses. We also find that it is necessary to maintain appropriate non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the vaccination rollout, especially in low-resource settings. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that starting vaccination as soon as possible is able to markedly alleviate the epidemic impact when the vaccine resources are limited but are currently available. Our model provides an effective tool to assist policymakers in developing adaptive COVID-19 likewise vaccination strategies for better preparedness against future pandemic threats.
Collapse
|
14
|
Nakazawa H, Sakai K, Sudo Y, Iwabuchi R, Sakai H, Nishina S, Kawakami T, Kawakami F, Matsuzawa S, Ito T, Kitahara M, Kamijo Y, Umemura T, Ushiki A, Kanai S, Tsuchiya H, Ishida F. Comparative analysis of humoral responses to BNT162b2 vaccine among patients with hematologic disorders and organ transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol 2022; 75:101713. [PMID: 36100196 PMCID: PMC9465495 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination against SARS-COV-2 is considered the most promising approach to curbing the pandemic. Patients with an immunocompromised state, such as those with hematological malignancies and organ transplantation recipients, are considered more susceptible to infection, but these at-risk patients were underrepresented in early clinical trials for vaccination. Although a growing body of studies suggests that the humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in each of these at-risk groups of patients may be suboptimal in comparison to healthy controls, a clinical and strategic information for the further comparative analysis among these groups is not fully described. The humoral responses after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccination were evaluated in a total of 187 patients either with allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation, with renal transplantation, with anti-CD20 antibody therapy, or with anti-CD38 antibody therapy, and in 66 healthy controls. The early response at one to three months after vaccination was significantly inferior among patients with renal transplantation, patients with anti-CD20 antibody therapy, and patients with anti-CD38 antibody therapy in comparison to healthy control. But the patients with allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation showed early humoral response comparable to healthy control. The late response at 6 months after vaccination was still suboptimal among patients with renal transplantation and patients with anti-CD20 therapy. Among our patient group, renal transplant recipients had the lowest antibody titers after vaccination regardless of timing of vaccination. Patients who had received allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation attained a comparable serological response to the control group especially if they are vaccinated >300 days after transplantation, but the response was suboptimal if the vaccination was within 300 days after transplantation. Our results may provide policy makers with critical information for the further stratification of at-risk groups, helping contribute to a better allocation of resources, including additional booster vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Nakazawa
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
| | - Kaoko Sakai
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Yuriko Sudo
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Ryohei Iwabuchi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Sakai
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Sayaka Nishina
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Toru Kawakami
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Fumihiro Kawakami
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Shuji Matsuzawa
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Toshiro Ito
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Matsumoto Medical Center, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Mari Kitahara
- Department of Hematology, Nagano Red-Cross Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | - Yuji Kamijo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Takeji Umemura
- The Second Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Atsuhito Ushiki
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Kanai
- Infection Control Room, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
- Department of Pharmacy, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Fumihiro Ishida
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|