A toolbox for class I HDACs reveals isoform specific roles in gene regulation and protein acetylation

Novel hydroxamic acid derivative induces apoptosis and constrains autophagy in leukemic cells

INTRODUCTION

Posttranslational modification of proteins by reversible acetylation regulates key biological processes. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) catalyze protein deacetylation and are frequently dysregulated in tumors. This has spurred the development of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi). Such epigenetic drugs modulate protein acetylation, eliminate tumor cells, and are approved for the treatment of blood cancers.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify novel, nanomolar HDACi with increased potency over existing agents and selectivity for the cancer-relevant class I HDACs (HDAC1,-2,-3,-8). Moreover, we wanted to define how such drugs control the apoptosis-autophagy interplay. As test systems, we used human leukemic cells and embryonic kidney-derived cells.

METHODS

We synthesized novel pyrimidine-hydroxamic acid HDACi (KH9/KH16/KH29) and performed in vitro activity assays and molecular modeling of their direct binding to HDACs. We analyzed how these HDACi affect leukemic cell fate, acetylation, and protein expression with flow cytometry and immunoblot. The publicly available DepMap database of CRISPR-Cas9 screenings was used to determine sensitivity factors across human leukemic cells.

RESULTS

Novel HDACi show nanomolar activity against class I HDACs. These agents are superior to the clinically used hydroxamic acid HDACi SAHA (vorinostat). Within the KH-series of compounds, KH16 (yanostat) is the most effective inhibitor of HDAC3 (IC50 = 6 nM) and the most potent inducer of apoptosis (IC50 = 110 nM; p < 0.0001) in leukemic cells. KH16 though spares embryonic kidney-derived cells. Global data analyses of knockout screenings verify that HDAC3 is a dependency factor in 115 human blood cancer cells of different lineages, independent of mutations in the tumor suppressor p53. KH16 alters pro- and anti-apoptotic protein expression, stalls cell cycle progression, and induces caspase-dependent processing of the autophagy proteins ULK1 and p62.

CONCLUSION

These data reveal that HDACs are required to stabilize autophagy proteins through suppression of apoptosis in leukemic cells. HDAC3 appears as a valid anti-cancer target for pharmacological intervention.

The Histone Deacetylase Family: Structural Features and Application of Combined Computational Methods

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are crucial in gene transcription, removing acetyl groups from histones. They also influence the deacetylation of non-histone proteins, contributing to the regulation of various biological processes. Thus, HDACs play pivotal roles in various diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and inflammatory conditions, highlighting their potential as therapeutic targets. This paper reviews the structure and function of the four classes of human HDACs. While four HDAC inhibitors are currently available for treating hematological malignancies, numerous others are undergoing clinical trials. However, their non-selective toxicity necessitates ongoing research into safer and more efficient class-selective or isoform-selective inhibitors. Computational methods have aided the discovery of HDAC inhibitors with the desired potency and/or selectivity. These methods include ligand-based approaches, such as scaffold hopping, pharmacophore modeling, three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships, and structure-based virtual screening (molecular docking). Moreover, recent developments in the field of molecular dynamics simulations, combined with Poisson-Boltzmann/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area techniques, have improved the prediction of ligand binding affinity. In this review, we delve into the ways in which these methods have contributed to designing and identifying HDAC inhibitors.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Signaling Pathways and Epigenetic Regulation

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are characterized by dysregulated signaling pathways that are crucial for tumor formation and progression. The efficacy of traditional therapies is limited, particularly in the treatment of PNETs at an advanced stage. Epigenetic alterations profoundly impact the activity of signaling pathways in cancer development, offering potential opportunities for drug development. There is currently a lack of extensive research on epigenetic regulation in PNETs. To fill this gap, we first summarize major signaling events that are involved in PNET development. Then, we discuss the epigenetic regulation of these signaling pathways in the context of both PNETs and commonly occurring-and therefore more extensively studied-malignancies. Finally, we will offer a perspective on the future research direction of the PNET epigenome and its potential applications in patient care.

Discussion on structure classification and regulation function of histone deacetylase and their inhibitor

Epigenetic regulation of genes through posttranslational regulation of proteins is a well-explored approach for disease treatment, particularly in cancer chemotherapy. Histone deacetylases have shown significant potential as effective drug targets in therapeutic studies aiming to restore epigenetic normality in oncology. Besides their role in modifying histones, histone deacetylases can also catalyze the deacetylation of various nonhistone proteins and participate in the regulation of multiple biological processes. This paper provides a review of the classification, structure, and functional characteristics of the four classes of human histone deacetylases. The increasing abundance of structural information on HDACs has led to the gradual elucidation of structural differences among subgroups and subtypes. This has provided a reasonable explanation for the selectivity of certain HDAC inhibitors. Currently, the US FDA has approved a total of six HDAC inhibitors for marketing, primarily for the treatment of various hematological tumors and a few solid tumors. These inhibitors all have a common pharmacodynamic moiety consisting of three parts: CAP, ZBG, and Linker. In this paper, the structure-effect relationship of HDAC inhibitors is explored by classifying the six HDAC inhibitors into three main groups: isohydroxamic acids, benzamides, and cyclic peptides, based on the type of inhibitor ZBG. However, there are still many questions that need to be answered in this field. In this paper, the structure-functional characteristics of HDACs and the structural information of the pharmacophore model and enzyme active region of HDAC is are considered, which can help to understand the inhibition mechanism of the compounds as well as the rational design of HDACs. This paper integrates the structural-functional characteristics of HDACs as well as the pharmacophore model of HDAC is and the structural information of the enzymatic active region, which not only contributes to the understanding of the inhibition mechanism of the compounds, but also provides a basis for the rational design of HDAC inhibitors.

GSE1 links the HDAC1/CoREST co-repressor complex to DNA damage

Post-translational modifications of histones are important regulators of the DNA damage response (DDR). By using affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) we discovered that genetic suppressor element 1 (GSE1) forms a complex with the HDAC1/CoREST deacetylase/demethylase co-repressor complex. In-depth phosphorylome analysis revealed that loss of GSE1 results in impaired DDR, ATR signalling and γH2AX formation upon DNA damage induction. Altered profiles of ATR target serine-glutamine motifs (SQ) on DDR-related hallmark proteins point to a defect in DNA damage sensing. In addition, GSE1 knock-out cells show hampered DNA damage-induced phosphorylation on SQ motifs of regulators of histone post-translational modifications, suggesting altered histone modification. While loss of GSE1 does not affect the histone deacetylation activity of CoREST, GSE1 appears to be essential for binding of the deubiquitinase USP22 to CoREST and for the deubiquitination of H2B K120 in response to DNA damage. The combination of deacetylase, demethylase, and deubiquitinase activity makes the USP22-GSE1-CoREST subcomplex a multi-enzymatic eraser that seems to play an important role during DDR. Since GSE1 has been previously associated with cancer progression and survival our findings are potentially of high medical relevance.

Discovery of Selective Histone Deacetylase 1 and 2 Inhibitors: Screening of a Focused Library Constructed by Click Chemistry, Kinetic Binding Analysis, and Biological Evaluation

Histone deacetylase 1 and 2 (HDAC1/2) inhibitors are potentially useful as tools for probing the biological functions of the isoforms and as therapeutic agents for cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. To discover potent and selective inhibitors, we screened a focused library synthesized by using click chemistry and obtained KPZ560 as an HDAC1/2-selective inhibitor. Kinetic binding analysis revealed that KPZ560 inhibits HDAC2 through a two-step slow-binding mechanism. In cellular assays, KPZ560 induced a dose- and time-dependent increase of histone acetylation and showed potent breast cancer cell growth-inhibitory activity. In addition, gene expression analyses suggested that the two-step slow-binding inhibition by KPZ560 regulated the expression of genes associated with cell proliferation and DNA damage. KPZ560 also induced neurite outgrowth of Neuro-2a cells and an increase in the spine density of granule neuron dendrites of mice. The unique two-step slow-binding character of o-aminoanilides such as KPZ560 makes them interesting candidates as therapeutic agents.

HDAC3 and HDAC8 PROTAC dual degrader reveals roles of histone acetylation in gene regulation

HDAC3 and HDAC8 have critical biological functions and represent highly sought-after therapeutic targets. Because histone deacetylases (HDACs) have a very conserved catalytic domain, developing isozyme-selective inhibitors remains challenging. HDAC3/8 also have deacetylase-independent activity, which cannot be blocked by conventional enzymatic inhibitors. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) can selectively degrade a target enzyme, abolishing both enzymatic and scaffolding function. Here, we report a novel HDAC3/8 dual degrader YX968 that induces highly potent, rapid, and selective degradation of both HDAC3/8 without triggering pan-HDAC inhibitory effects. Unbiased quantitative proteomic experiments confirmed its high selectivity. HDAC3/8 degradation by YX968 does not induce histone hyperacetylation and broad transcriptomic perturbation. Thus, histone hyperacetylation may be a major factor for altering transcription. YX968 promotes apoptosis and kills cancer cells with a high potency in vitro. YX968 thus represents a new probe for dissecting the complex biological functions of HDAC3/8.

Activation of β2-adrenergic receptors prevents AD-type synaptotoxicity via epigenetic mechanisms

We previously reported that prolonged exposure to an enriched environment (EE) enhances hippocampal synaptic plasticity, with one of the significant mechanistic pathways being activation of β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) signaling, thereby mitigating the synaptotoxic effects of soluble oligomers of amyloid β-protein (oAβ). However, the detailed mechanism remained elusive. In this work, we recorded field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) in the CA1 region of mouse hippocampal slices treated with or without toxic Aβ-species. We found that pharmacological activation of β2-AR, but not β1-AR, selectively mimicked the effects of EE in enhancing LTP and preventing oAβ-induced synaptic dysfunction. Mechanistic analyses showed that certain histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors mimicked the benefits of EE, but this was not seen in β2-AR knockout mice, suggesting that activating β2-AR prevents oAβ-mediated synaptic dysfunction via changes in histone acetylation. EE or activation of β-ARs each decreased HDAC2, whereas Aβ oligomers increased HDAC2 levels in the hippocampus. Further, oAβ-induced inflammatory effects and neurite degeneration were prevented by either β2-AR agonists or certain specific HDAC inhibitors. These preclinical results suggest that activation of β2-AR is a novel potential therapeutic strategy to mitigate oAβ-mediated features of AD.

Endogenous expression of inactive lysine deacetylases reveals deacetylation-dependent cellular mechanisms

Acetylation of lysine residues is an important and common post-translational regulatory mechanism occurring on thousands of non-histone proteins. Lysine deacetylases (KDACs or HDACs) are a family of enzymes responsible for removing acetylation. To identify the biological mechanisms regulated by individual KDACs, we created HT1080 cell lines containing chromosomal point mutations, which endogenously express either KDAC6 or KDAC8 having single inactivated catalytic domain. Engineered HT1080 cells expressing inactive KDA6 or KDAC8 domains remained viable and exhibited enhanced acetylation on known substrate proteins. RNA-seq analysis revealed that many changes in gene expression were observed when KDACs were inactivated, and that these gene sets differed significantly from knockdown and knockout cell lines. Using GO ontology, we identified several critical biological processes associated specifically with catalytic activity and others attributable to non-catalytic interactions. Treatment of wild-type cells with KDAC-specific inhibitors Tubastatin A and PCI-34051 resulted in gene expression changes distinct from those of the engineered cell lines, validating this approach as a tool for evaluating in-cell inhibitor specificity and identifying off-target effects of KDAC inhibitors. Probing the functions of specific KDAC domains using these cell lines is not equivalent to doing so using previously existing methods and provides novel insight into the catalytic functions of individual KDACs by investigating the molecular and cellular changes upon genetic inactivation.

Lysine Deacetylase Substrate Selectivity: Distinct Interaction Surfaces Drive Positive and Negative Selection for Residues Following Acetyllysine

Lysine acetylation is a post-translational modification that is reversed by lysine deacetylases (KDACs). The goal of this work was to identify determinants of substrate specificity for KDACs, focusing on short-range interactions occurring with residues immediately following the acetyllysine. Using a fluorescence-based in vitro assay, we determined the activity for each enzyme with a limited panel of derivative substrate peptides, revealing a distinct reactivity profile for each enzyme. We mapped the interaction surface for KDAC6, KDAC8, and KDAC1 with the +1 and +2 substrate residues (with respect to acetyllysine) based on enzyme-substrate interaction pairs observed in molecular dynamics simulations. Characteristic residues in each KDAC interact preferentially with particular substrate residues and correlate with either enhanced or inhibited activity. Although nonpolar aromatic residues generally enhanced activity with all KDACs, the manner in which each enzyme interacted with these residues is distinct. Furthermore, each KDAC has distinctive interactions that correlate with lower activity, primarily ionic in nature. KDAC8 exhibited the most diverse and widest range of effects, while KDAC6 was sensitive only to the +1 position and KDAC1 selectivity was primarily driven by negative selection. The substrate preferences were validated for KDAC6 and KDAC8 using a set of peptides derived from known acetylated proteins. Overall, we determined how KDAC6, KDAC8, and KDAC1 achieve substrate specificity with residues following the acetyllysine. These new insights into KDAC specificity will be critical for identifying novel substrates of particular KDACs, designing KDAC-specific inhibitors, and demonstrate a general framework for understanding substrate specificity for other enzyme classes.

DOT1L inhibition does not modify the sensitivity of cutaneous T cell lymphoma to pan-HDAC inhibitors in vitro

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are a subset of T-cell malignancies presenting in the skin. The treatment options for CTCL, in particular in advanced stages, are limited. One of the emerging therapies for CTCL is treatment with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. We recently discovered an evolutionarily conserved crosstalk between HDAC1, one of the targets of HDAC inhibitors, and the histone methyltransferase DOT1L. HDAC1 negatively regulates DOT1L activity in yeast, mouse thymocytes, and mouse thymic lymphoma. Here we studied the functional relationship between HDAC inhibitors and DOT1L in two human CTCL cell lines, specifically addressing the question whether the crosstalk between DOT1L and HDAC1 observed in mouse T cells plays a role in the therapeutic effect of clinically relevant broad-acting HDAC inhibitors in the treatment of human CTCL. We confirmed that human CTCL cell lines were sensitive to treatment with pan-HDAC inhibitors. In contrast, the cell lines were not sensitive to DOT1L inhibitors. Combining both types of inhibitors did neither enhance nor suppress the inhibitory effect of HDAC inhibitors on CTCL cells. Thus our in vitro studies suggest that the effect of commonly used pan-HDAC inhibitors in CTCL cells relies on downstream effects other than DOT1L misregulation.