Definitions matter: Heterogeneity of COVID-19 disease severity criteria and incomplete reporting compromise meta-analysis

Characteristics of long COVID in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Numerous cases of long coronavirus disease (long COVID) have been reported in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Despite the reviews on clinical manifestations of long COVID in the general population, systematic reviews on ARD patients are scarce. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients.

Methods

We searched the literature in PubMed and Embase as of 27 December 2022. Cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies relevant to long COVID in ARD patients were collected. Stratification based on the severity of COVID infection and subtypes of rheumatic diseases [systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) vs non-autoimmune rheumatic disease (NARD)] was also undertaken. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 15 relevant studies were identified from the literature. The prevalence of long COVID was 56% (95% CI 34, 76) in 2995 patients. Hospitalized COVID patients had a higher proportion of long COVID than non-hospitalized patients. The prevalence of long COVID was similar between SARD and NARD patients. In terms of symptoms, fatigue, arthralgia and pain were commonly reported in long COVID patients with ARDs.

Conclusion

The characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients are generally similar to those in the general population despite a higher prevalence and a higher proportion of arthralgia and pain.

Maternal vaccination against COVID-19 and neonatal outcomes during Omicron: INTERCOVID-2022 study

BACKGROUND

In early 2023, when Omicron was the variant of concern, we showed that vaccinating pregnant women decreased the risk for severe COVID-19-related complications and maternal morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy on newborns and the effects of maternal COVID-19 vaccination on neonatal outcomes when Omicron was the variant of concern.

STUDY DESIGN

INTERCOVID-2022 was a large, prospective, observational study, conducted in 40 hospitals across 18 countries, from November 27, 2021 (the day after the World Health Organization declared Omicron the variant of concern) to June 30, 2022, to assess the effect of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes and to assess vaccine effectiveness. Women diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy were compared with 2 nondiagnosed, unmatched women recruited concomitantly and consecutively during pregnancy or at delivery. Mother-newborn dyads were followed until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were a neonatal positive test for COVID-19, severe neonatal morbidity index, severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index, preterm birth, neonatal death, referral to neonatal intensive care unit, and diseases during the neonatal period. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with adjustment for maternal risk profile.

RESULTS

We enrolled 4707 neonates born to 1577 (33.5%) mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and 3130 (66.5%) nondiagnosed mothers. Among the diagnosed mothers, 642 (40.7%) were not vaccinated, 147 (9.3%) were partially vaccinated, 551 (34.9%) were completely vaccinated, and 237 (15.0%) also had a booster vaccine. Neonates of booster-vaccinated mothers had less than half (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.91) the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 when compared with those of unvaccinated mothers; they also had the lowest rates of preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, respiratory distress syndrome, and number of days in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborns of unvaccinated mothers had double the risk for neonatal death (relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.00) when compared with those of nondiagnosed mothers. Vaccination was not associated with any congenital malformations. Although all vaccines provided protection against neonatal test positivity, newborns of booster-vaccinated mothers had the highest vaccine effectiveness (64%; 95% confidence interval, 10%-86%). Vaccine effectiveness was not as high for messenger RNA vaccines only. Vaccine effectiveness against moderate or severe neonatal outcomes was much lower, namely 13% in the booster-vaccinated group (all vaccines) and 25% and 28% in the completely and booster-vaccinated groups, respectively (messenger RNA vaccines only). Vaccines were fairly effective in protecting neonates when given to pregnant women ≤100 days (14 weeks) before birth; thereafter, the risk increased and was much higher after 200 days (29 weeks). Finally, none of the neonatal practices studied, including skin-to-skin contact and direct breastfeeding, increased the risk for infecting newborns.

CONCLUSION

When Omicron was the variant of concern, newborns of unvaccinated mothers had an increased risk for neonatal death. Neonates of vaccinated mothers had a decreased risk for preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Because the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination decreases with time, to ensure that newborns are maximally protected against COVID-19, mothers should receive a vaccine or booster dose no more than 14 weeks before the expected date of delivery.

Neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2: A Pathological Examination of Neurosurgical Specimens

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neurological manifestations may occur in more than 80% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection, including severe disruptions of the central nervous system (CNS), such as strokes, encephalitis, or seizures. Although the primary pathophysiological mechanism for the effects of COVID-19 in CNS remains unknown, evidence exists for both direct injury from neuroinvasion and indirect effects from disruptions in systemic inflammatory and coagulation pathways. In this study, we analyzed CNS tissue from living patients to better understand these processes.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval and patient consent, samples that would be otherwise discarded from patients with active or recent (within 6 days of surgery) COVID-19 infection undergoing neurosurgical intervention were collected and tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, electron microscopy, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Five patients with perioperative mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection met inclusion criteria (2 male, 3 female; mean age 38.8 ± 13.5 years). Neurosurgical diagnoses included a glioblastoma, a ruptured arteriovenous malformation, a ruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm, a middle cerebral artery occlusion, and a hemorrhagic pontine cavernous malformation. Samples analyzed included the frontal lobe cortex, olfactory nerve, arteriovenous malformation/temporal lobe parenchyma, middle cerebral artery, cerebellum, and cavernous malformation/brainstem parenchyma. Testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 was negative in all samples.

CONCLUSION

The CNS is likely not a significant viral reservoir during mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection, although direct neuroinvasion is not definitively excluded. Additional testing to help elucidate the relative contributions of direct and indirect pathways for CNS injury from COVID is warranted.

[Retrospective clinical-causal evaluation of a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients across the age spectrum in a primary care hospital]

INTRODUCTION

It is often discussed that a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients may not be causally linked to the hospital stay, but no scientific data are available from Germany. Therefore, we analyzed to what extent a positive PCR test could be assessed as causal or secondary to admission according to clinical criteria in a tertiary care hospital of the first 4 months of 2022.

METHODS

SARS-CoV-2-positive patients of RoMed-Klinikum Rosenheim/Bavaria from 01/01/2022 to 30/04/2022 were included. Patients were divided into a group with COVID-19 as direct reason for admission (CAW), and a group, in which this did not apply according to a comprehensive clinical assessment (nCAW). Patients with no clear allocation to these groups were counted separately. Categorization was based on a multilevel procedure and performed by an internist experienced in COVD-19 (M.H.). It included all available clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings as well as treatment decisions.

RESULTS

647 cases were included (age 10 days to 101 years, median 68 years; 49.5% women), including 13 patients in two admissions with positive PCR. 45.3% (n=293) were attributable to the group with COVID as the reason for admission, 48.8% (n=316) were not, no clear decision could be made in 35 patients, 3 patients were transferred from other clinics for isolation. In infants (up to 1 year), a positive PCR test was more frequently categorized as causative than in older patients. Leading symptoms of classification were found to be fatigue/fatigue, fever/chills, and cough on admission. Febrile convulsions accounted for the reason for admission in 10 cases of children (age 1.1-7.6 years). Length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (median (quartiles) 5 (2; 10) days for CAW, 5 (2; 12) for nCAW), nor did in-hospital mortality and median age of deceased or survivors.

DISCUSSION

A retrospective analysis of all clinical data revealed that positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR played a major and - according to clinical criteria - causative role for admission and hospitalization in nearly 50% of cases, whereas it was an incidental finding in just under 50%. These results confirm data from other countries and demonstrate that the role of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test for hospitalization can only be answered by a comprehensive and elaborate analysis of individual data.

Rare Variants in Primary Immunodeficiency Genes and Their Functional Partners in Severe COVID-19

The development of severe COVID-19, which is a complex multisystem disease, is thought to be associated with many genes whose action is modulated by numerous environmental and genetic factors. In this study, we focused on the ideas of the omnigenic model of heritability of complex traits, which assumes that a small number of core genes and a large pool of peripheral genes expressed in disease-relevant tissues contribute to the genetics of complex traits through interconnected networks. We hypothesized that primary immunodeficiency disease (PID) genes may be considered as core genes in severe COVID-19, and their functional partners (FPs) from protein-protein interaction networks may be considered as peripheral near-core genes. We used whole-exome sequencing data from patients aged ≤ 45 years with severe (n = 9) and non-severe COVID-19 (n = 11), and assessed the cumulative contribution of rare high-impact variants to disease severity. In patients with severe COVID-19, an excess of rare high-impact variants was observed at the whole-exome level, but maximal association signals were detected for PID + FP gene subsets among the genes intolerant to LoF variants, haploinsufficient and essential. Our exploratory study may serve as a model for new directions in the research of host genetics in severe COVID-19.

Soluble RAGE as a Prognostic Marker of Worsening in Patients Admitted to the ICU for COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The different waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection have strained hospital resources and, notably, intensive care units (ICUs). Identifying patients at risk of developing a critical condition is essential to correctly refer patients to the appropriate structure and to spare limited resources. The soluble form of RAGE (sRAGE), the endoplasmic stress response and its surrogates, GRP78 and VEGF-A, may be interesting markers. Methods: This was a prospective monocenter cohort study of adult patients admitted to the ICU for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The plasma levels of sRAGE, GRP78 and VEGF-A were measured within the first 24 h. Patients were classified as critical if they further needed vasopressor therapy, renal replacement therapy, or invasive mechanical ventilation, or died during their ICU stay, and were otherwise classified as not critical. Results: A total of 98 patients were included and 39 developed a critical condition. Critical patients presented higher sRAGE (626 [450−1043] vs. 227 [137−404] pg/mL, p < 0.0001), interleukin-6 (43 [15−112] vs. 11 [5−20] pg/mL, p < 0.0001), troponin T (17 [9−39] vs. 10 [6−18] pg/mL, p = 0.003) and NT-pro-BNP (321 [118−446] vs. 169 [63−366] pg/mL, p = 0.009) plasma levels. No difference was observed for VEGF-A and GRP78. The variables independently associated with worsening in the ICU were sRAGE (1.03 [1.01−1.05] per 10 pg/mL) and age (1.7 [1.2−2.4] per 5 years). An sRAGE value of 449.5 pg/mL predicted worsening with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 80%. Conclusion: sRAGE may allow the identification of patients at risk of developing a critical form of COVID-19 pneumonia, and thus may be useful to correctly refer patients to the appropriate structure of care.