1
|
Ngarmbatedjimal A, Abdelaziz M, Allambademel VDP, Diarra A, Djerambete V, Kodjimadje T, Luketa S, Madjigoto R, Miangotar Y, Ndingayande A, Tamira S, Varelis T, Vourbane K, Casey SE. Refugee women's and providers' perceptions of person-centered maternity care: a qualitative study in two refugee camps in Chad. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:225. [PMID: 38561681 PMCID: PMC10983620 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06424-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, mistreatment of women during labor and delivery is a common human rights violation. Person-centered maternity care (PCMC), a critical component of quality of care, is respectful and responsive to an individual's needs and preferences. Factors related to poor PCMC are often exacerbated in humanitarian settings. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study to understand Sudanese refugee women's experiences, including their perceptions of quality of care, during labor and delivery at the maternities in two refugee camps in eastern Chad, as well as maternity health workers' perceptions of PCMC and how they could be better supported to provide this. In-depth interviews were conducted individually with 22 women who delivered in the camp maternities and five trained midwives working in the two maternities; and in six dyads with a total of 11 Sudanese refugee traditional birth attendants and one assistant midwife. In addition, facility assessments were conducted at each maternity to determine their capacity to provide PCMC. RESULTS Overall, women reported positive experiences in the camp maternities during labor and delivery. Providers overwhelmingly defined respectful care as patient-centered and respect as being something fundamental to their role as health workers. While very few reported incidents of disrespect between providers and patients in the maternity, resource constraints, including overwork of the providers and overcrowding, resulted in some women feeling neglected. CONCLUSIONS Despite providers' commitment to offering person-centered care and women's generally positive experiences in this study, one of few that explored PCMC in a refugee camp, conflict and displacement exacerbates the conditions that contribute to mistreatment during labor and delivery. Good PCMC requires organizational emphasis and support, including adequate working conditions and ensuring suitable resources so health workers can effectively perform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Ngarmbatedjimal
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Mahamat Abdelaziz
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Vincent de Paul Allambademel
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Aminata Diarra
- RAISE Initiative, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Valentin Djerambete
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Thérèse Kodjimadje
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Samy Luketa
- International Rescue Committee Chad, BP 5208, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Robert Madjigoto
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Yodé Miangotar
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | | | - Salomon Tamira
- Laboratoire de Sociologie, d'Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, BP 1117, N'Djaména, Chad
| | - Theodora Varelis
- RAISE Initiative, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Sara E Casey
- RAISE Initiative, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corsi Decenti E, Salvatore MA, Mandolini D, Sampaolo L, D'Aloja P, Donati S. Perinatal care in SARS-CoV-2 infected women: the lesson learnt from a national prospective cohort study during the pandemic in Italy. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2562. [PMID: 38129838 PMCID: PMC10740257 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17390-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the growing importance given to ensuring high-quality childbirth, perinatal good practices have been rapidly disrupted by SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This study aimed at describing the childbirth care provided to infected women during two years of COVID-19 emergency in Italy. METHODS A prospective cohort study enrolling all women who gave birth with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 7 days from hospital admission in the 218 maternity units active in Italy during the periods February 25, 2020-June 30, 2021, and January 1-May 31, 2022. Perinatal care was assessed by evaluating the prevalence of the following indicators during the pandemic: presence of a labour companion; skin-to-skin; no mother-child separation at birth; rooming-in; breastfeeding. Logistic regression models including women' socio-demographic, obstetric and medical characteristics, were used to assess the association between the adherence to perinatal practices and different pandemic phases. RESULTS During the study period, 5,360 SARS-CoV-2 positive women were enrolled. Overall, among those who had a vaginal delivery (n = 3,574; 66.8%), 37.5% had a labour companion, 70.5% of newborns were not separated from their mothers at birth, 88.1% were roomed-in, and 88.0% breastfed. These four indicators showed similar variations in the study period with a negative peak between September 2020 and January 2021 and a gradual increase during the Alpha and Omicron waves. Skin-to-skin (mean value 66.2%) had its lowest level at the beginning of the pandemic and gradually increased throughout the study period. Among women who had a caesarean section (n = 1,777; 33.2%), all the indicators showed notably worse outcomes with similar variations in the study period. Multiple logistic regression analyses confirm the observed variations during the pandemic and show a lower adherence to good practices in southern regions and in maternity units with a higher annual number of births. CONCLUSIONS Despite the rising trend in the studied indicators, we observed concerning substandard childbirth care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Continued efforts are necessary to underscore the significance of the experience of care as a vital component in enhancing the quality of family-centred care policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Corsi Decenti
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Michele Antonio Salvatore
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Donatella Mandolini
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Letizia Sampaolo
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola D'Aloja
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Serena Donati
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maaløe N, Kujabi ML, Nathan NO, Skovdal M, Dmello BS, Wray S, van den Akker T, Housseine N. Inconsistent definitions of labour progress and over-medicalisation cause unnecessary harm during birth. BMJ 2023; 383:e076515. [PMID: 38084433 PMCID: PMC10726361 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nanna Maaløe
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Monica Lauridsen Kujabi
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
| | - Nina Olsén Nathan
- Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Skovdal
- Section for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brenda Sequeira Dmello
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- CCBRT Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, East Africa
| | - Susan Wray
- Women and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Thomas van den Akker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Natasha Housseine
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University, Tanzania, East Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kinrade SH. Reducing the Adverse Effects of Birth Trauma Among Birth Companions. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2023; 52:509-519. [PMID: 37634544 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Birth trauma affects the entire family, yet limited attention has been directed to how nurses influence the experiences of birth companions. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to increase awareness of birth trauma among birth companions and provide nursing strategies to reduce the adverse effects of traumatic childbirth among birth companions. I review background information describing birth companions' perceptions of childbirth as traumatic and the implications of birth trauma. I then present protective nursing strategies before, during, and after birth, followed by a discussion on implications. Lastly, I offer a summary of protective nursing strategies, an example of postnatal debriefing using the adapted ASSIST communication tool, and available online birth companion resources.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mehrtash H, Bohren MA, Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Irinyenikan TA, Berger BO, Maya E, Balde MD, Maung TM, Aderoba AK, Tuncalp Ö, Leslie HH. Comparing observed occurrence of mistreatment during childbirth with women's self-report: a validation study in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 5:e012122. [PMID: 37479486 PMCID: PMC10366988 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been substantial progress in developing approaches to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth. However, less is known about the differences in measurement approaches. In this study, we compare measures of mistreatment obtained from the same women using labour observations and community-based surveys in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria. METHODS Experiences of mistreatment during childbirth are person-centred quality measures. As such, we assessed individual-level and population-level accuracy of labour observation relative to women's self-report for different types of mistreatment. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement and population-level inflation factor (IF), assessing prevalence of mistreatment in labour observation divided by 'true' prevalence in women's self-report. We report the IF degree of bias as: low (0.75 RESULTS 1536 women across Ghana (n=779), Guinea (n=425) and Nigeria (n=332) were included. Most mistreatment items demonstrated better specificity than sensitivity: observation of any physical abuse (44% sensitive, 89% specific), any verbal abuse (61% sensitive, 73% specific) and presence of a labour companion (19% sensitive, 93% specific). Items for stigma (IF 0.16), pain relief requested (IF 0.38), companion present (IF 0.32) and lack of easy access to fluids (IF 0.46) showed high risk of bias, meaning labour observations would substantially underestimate true prevalence. Other items showed low or moderate bias. CONCLUSION Using self-report as the reference standard, labour observations demonstrated moderate-to-high specificity (accurately identifying lack of mistreatment) but low-to-moderate sensitivity (accurately identifying presence of mistreatment) among women. For overall prevalence, either women's self-report or observations can be used with low-moderate bias for most mistreatment items. However, given the dynamicity, complexity, and limitations in 'objectivity', some experiences of mistreatment (stigma, pain relief, labour companionship, easy access to fluids) require measurement via women's self-report. More work is needed to understand how subjectivity influences how well a measure represents individual's experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedieh Mehrtash
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Blair O Berger
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ernest Maya
- Department of Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Mamadou Dioulde Balde
- Cellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), Conakry, Guinea
| | - Thae Maung Maung
- Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Adeniyi Kolade Aderoba
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mother and Child Hospital Akure, Akure, Nigeria
| | - Özge Tuncalp
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hannah H Leslie
- Division of Prevention Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yaya Bocoum F, Kabore CP, Barro S, Zerbo R, Tiendrebeogo S, Hanson C, Dumont A, Betran AP, Bohren MA. Women's and health providers' perceptions of companionship during labor and childbirth: a formative study for the implementation of WHO companionship model in Burkina Faso. Reprod Health 2023; 20:46. [PMID: 36941676 PMCID: PMC10029160 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01597-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A key component of achieving respectful maternal and newborn care is labor companionship. Despite important health benefits for the woman and baby, there are critical gaps in implementing labor companionship for all women globally. The paper aims to present the perceptions and experiences of pregnant women, postpartum women, and health care providers regarding companionship during labor and childbirth, and to identify barriers and facilitating factors to the implementation of labor companionship in Burkina Faso. METHODS This is a formative study to inform the "Appropriate use of cesarean section through QUALIty DECision-making by women and providers" (QUALI-DEC) study, to design, adapt and implement a strategy to optimize the use of the cesarean section, including labor companionship. We use in-depth interviews (women, potential companions, and health workers) and health facility readiness assessments in eight hospitals across Burkina Faso. We use a thematic analysis approach for interviews, and narrative summaries to describe facility readiness assessment. RESULTS In all, 77 qualitative interviews and eight readiness assessments are included in this analysis. The findings showed that all participants acknowledged an existing traditional companionship model, which allowed companions to support women only in the hospital waiting room and post-natal room. Despite recognizing clear benefits, participants were not familiar with companionship during labor and childbirth in the hospital as recommended by WHO. Key barriers to implementing companionship throughout labor and birth include limited space in labor and delivery wards, no private rooms for women, hospital rules preventing companionship, and social norms preventing the choice of a companion by the woman. CONCLUSION Labor companionship was considered highly acceptable in Burkina Faso, but more work is needed to adapt to the hospital environment. Revisions to hospital policies to allow companions during labor and childbirth are needed as well as changes to provide private space for women. Training potential companions about their roles and encouraging women's rights to choose their companions may help to facilitate effective implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadima Yaya Bocoum
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
- African Population Health Research Center, Dakar, Senegal.
| | | | - Saran Barro
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Roger Zerbo
- INSS-CNRST/LARISS et CEFORGRIS-UJKZ/IRL-3189 "Environnement Santé et Sociétés", Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Simon Tiendrebeogo
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Alexandre Dumont
- CEPED, Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, IRD-Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France
| | - Ana Pilar Betran
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|