1
|
Li Y, Xu Z, Xie T, Xing P, Ying J, Li J. Heterogeneity of resistant mechanisms in an EGFR-TKI relapsed patient with EGFR amplification and response to nimotuzumab: A case report. Front Oncol 2022; 12:937282. [PMID: 36033496 PMCID: PMC9403890 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
EGFR mutations are the most important drivers of gene alterations in lung adenocarcinomas and are sensitive to EGFR-TKIs. However, resistance to EGFR-TKIs is inevitable in the majority of EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients. Numerous resistant mechanisms have been revealed to date, and more are still under investigation. Owing to the selective pressure, intratumoral heterogeneity may exist after resistance, especially in patients after multiple lines of treatment. For those patients, it is important to choose therapies focused on the trunk/major clone of the tumor in order to achieve optimal clinical benefit. Here, we will report an EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patient with heterogeneity of resistant mechanisms including EGFR amplification, large fragment deletion of RB1, and histological transformations after targeted treatments. In our case, EGFR amplification seemed to be the major clone of the resistant mechanism according to the next-generation sequencing (NGS) results of both liquid biopsy monitoring and tissue biopsies. In consideration of the high EGFR amplification level, the patient was administered by combination treatment with EGFR-TKI plus nimotuzumab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), and achieved a certain degree of clinical benefit. Our case sheds light on the treatment of EGFR-mutant patients with EGFR amplification and indicates that a combination of EGFR-TKI with anti-EGFR mAb might be one of the possible treatment options based on genetic tests. Moreover, the decision on therapeutic approaches should focus on the major clone of the tumor and should make timely adjustments according to the dynamic changes of genetic characteristics during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Li
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziyi Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tongji Xie
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Puyuan Xing
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Ying
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junling Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Junling Li,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mutation Status and Immunohistochemical Correlation of EGFR Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Balkan J Med Genet 2021; 24:67-72. [PMID: 34447661 PMCID: PMC8366477 DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2021-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Being one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide and their resistance to conventional treatment methods, made gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) one of the hot topics in medical research areas in the past decade. To investigate molecular alterations underlying the tumor is of great importance to be able to develop new, targeted treatment options. In this study, GIST samples obtained from 40 Turkish patients were analyzed for actionable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations that are related to treatment regimes in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to understand whether EGFR expression is altered in GISTs. Established alterations in EGFR can make the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors possible, which are currently used in cancer therapy, especially in NSCLC. Our results indicated that EGFR mutations are rare in GISTs. Further research is needed to sequence whole coding regions of the gene to investigate new actionable mutations in EGFR in an increased sample size.
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams CJM, Seligmann JF, Elliott F, Shires M, Richman SD, Brown S, Zhang L, Singh S, Pugh J, Xu XM, Muranyi A, Guetter C, Lorsakul A, Kurkure U, Zhao Z, Martin J, Wang X, Nguyen K, Liu WW, Yan D, West NP, Barrett JH, Barnes M, Bai I, Seymour MT, Quirke P, Shanmugam K. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Amphiregulin and Epiregulin IHC Predicts Panitumumab Benefit in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:3422-3431. [PMID: 33888518 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine practice due to issues with analytic precision and practicality. We investigated whether AREG/EREG IHC could predict benefit from the anti-EGFR agent panitumumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Artificial intelligence algorithms were developed to assess AREG/EREG IHC in 274 patients from the PICCOLO trial of irinotecan with or without panitumumab (Ir vs. IrPan) in RAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were RECIST response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Models were repeated adjusting separately for BRAF mutation status and primary tumor location (PTL). RESULTS High ligand expression was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir [8.0 vs. 3.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.79; P = 0.001]; whereas low ligand expression was not (3.4 vs. 4.4 months; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74-1.49; P = 0.78). The ligand-treatment interaction was significant (P interaction = 0.02) and remained significant after adjustment for BRAF-mutation status and PTL. Likewise, RECIST RR was significantly improved in patients with high ligand expression (IrPan vs. Ir: 48% vs. 6%; P < 0.0001) but not those with low ligand expression (25% vs. 14%; P = 0.10; P interaction = 0.01). The effect on OS was similar but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AREG/EREG IHC identified patients who benefitted from the addition of panitumumab to irinotecan chemotherapy. IHC is a practicable assay that may be of use in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J M Williams
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny F Seligmann
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Faye Elliott
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Shires
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Susan D Richman
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Liping Zhang
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Shalini Singh
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Judith Pugh
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Xiao-Meng Xu
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Andrea Muranyi
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Christoph Guetter
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Imaging and Algorithms, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, California
| | - Auranuch Lorsakul
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Imaging and Algorithms, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, California
| | - Uday Kurkure
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Imaging and Algorithms, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, California
| | - Zuo Zhao
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Imaging and Algorithms, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, California
| | - Jim Martin
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Imaging and Algorithms, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, California
| | - Xingwei Wang
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Imaging and Algorithms, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, California
| | | | - Wen-Wei Liu
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Dongyao Yan
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Nicholas P West
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer H Barrett
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Isaac Bai
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Matthew T Seymour
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Quirke
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Kandavel Shanmugam
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Medical and Scientific Affairs, Tucson, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Samatiwat P, Tabtimmai L, Suphakun P, Jiwacharoenchai N, Toviwek B, Kukongviriyapan V, Gleeson MP, Choowongkomon K. The Effect of the EGFR - Targeting Compound 3-[(4-Phenylpyrimidin-2-yl) Amino] Benzene-1-Sulfonamide (13f) against Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Lines. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2021; 22:381-390. [PMID: 33639651 PMCID: PMC8190356 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.2.381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a noxious malignancy of epithelium of the bile duct with a low response rate to chemotherapy. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway is implicated in the development of cancerous cells, especially CCA. In this study, we report detailed biological profiling of 13f identified from our earlier hit expansion studies. The aim of this work was to expand our understanding of 13f via more detailed investigations of its mechanism of action against KKU-100, KKU-452 and KKU-M156 CCA cells, as well as in comparison to the EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib and non-specific chemotherapeutic agents such as Cisplatin. METHODS Inhibiting EGFR-Kinase, cytotoxicity, clonogenic assay, wound healing and apoptosis were performed. Levels of total expression of EGFR and EGFR phosphorylation proteins were detected. RESULTS 13f was confirmed as an inhibitor of EGFR with an IC50 value against the tyrosine kinase of EGFR of 22 nM and IC50 values for 48 h incubation period were 1.3 ± 1.9, 1.5 ± 0.4 and 1.7 ± 1.1 µM of KKU-100, KKU-452 and KKU-M156, respectively through dose- and time-dependent induction of early apoptosis of CCA cells. The compound also suppressed the clonogenic ability of KKU-100 and KKU-M156 cells stronger than Gefitinib, while potently inhibiting EGF-stimulated CCA cell migratory activity in KKU-452 cells. It was observed that under normal conditions EGFR was activated in CCA cells. EGF-stimulated basal expression of EGFR in KKU-452 cells was suppressed following 13f treatment, which was significantly greater than that of the marketed EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib. CONCLUSION In summary, our study showed that 13f has potent anti-cancer activities including antiproliferation, clonogenic ability and migration through the modulation of EGFR signaling pathway in CCA for the first time. The compound represents an interesting starting point as a potential chemotherapeutic agent in ongoing efforts to improve response rate in CCA patients.<br />.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Papavee Samatiwat
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand.
| | - Lueacha Tabtimmai
- Department of Biochemistry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
| | - Prapasri Suphakun
- Department of Biochemistry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
| | - Nattanan Jiwacharoenchai
- Genetic Engineering Interdisciplinary Program, Graduate School, Kasetsart University, 10900, Thailand.
| | | | - Veerapol Kukongviriyapan
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
| | - M. Paul Gleeson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok. Thailand.
| | - Kiattawee Choowongkomon
- Department of Biochemistry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
- Center for Advanced Studies in Nanotechnology for Chemical, Food and Agricultural Industries, KU Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
- For Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A phase 2 study of panitumumab with irinotecan as salvage therapy in chemorefractory KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2019; 121:378-383. [PMID: 31363167 PMCID: PMC6738054 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0537-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted agents are standard treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the first- and second-line settings. This phase 2 study determined the benefit of targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with panitumumab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory patients. METHODS KRAS exon-2 wild-type patients failing prior irinotecan received panitumumab (6 mg/kg) and irinotecan (180 mg/m²) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). KRAS exon-2 status was evaluated centrally, along with NRAS, BRAF mutations, epiregulin, amphiregulin, PTEN and EGFR copy number status, and correlated with efficacy. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were treated. Among the 46 wild-type RAS patients, the ORR was 15.2% (seven partial responses), with median PFS of 3.8 months (95% CI 2.7-4.3) and median OS of 12.5 months (95% CI 6.7-15.9). Wild-type BRAF patients showed a 13.0% response rate. No significant correlations between response and baseline biomarker expression were identified. Common grade 3-4 adverse events were diarrhoea and rash (18.0% each), hypomagnesaemia and asthenia (8.2% each). CONCLUSIONS The addition of panitumumab to irinotecan as salvage therapy is feasible but has limited activity in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. No biomarkers predictive of response were identified.
Collapse
|
6
|
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Panitumumab in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet 2019; 57:455-473. [PMID: 28853050 PMCID: PMC5856878 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0590-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Despite progress in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the last 15 years, it is still a condition with a relatively low 5-year survival rate. Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is able to prolong survival in patients with mCRC. Panitumumab is used in different lines of therapy in combination with chemotherapy, and as monotherapy for the treatment of wild-type (WT) RAS mCRC. It is administered as an intravenous infusion of 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks and has a t½ of approximately 7.5 days. Elimination takes place via two different mechanisms, and immunogenicity rates are low. Only RAS mutations have been confirmed as a negative predictor of efficacy with anti-EGFR antibodies. Panitumumab is generally well tolerated and has a manageable toxicity profile, despite a very high prevalence of dermatologic side effects. This article presents an overview of the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of panitumumab, including a description of the studies that led to its approval in the different lines of therapy of mCRC.
Collapse
|
7
|
Getz M, Swanson L, Sahoo D, Ghosh P, Rangamani P. A predictive computational model reveals that GIV/girdin serves as a tunable valve for EGFR-stimulated cyclic AMP signals. Mol Biol Cell 2019; 30:1621-1633. [PMID: 31017840 PMCID: PMC6727633 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e18-10-0630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cellular levels of the versatile second messenger cyclic (c)AMP are regulated by the antagonistic actions of the canonical G protein → adenylyl cyclase pathway that is initiated by G-protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) and attenuated by phosphodiesterases (PDEs). Dysregulated cAMP signaling drives many diseases; for example, its low levels facilitate numerous sinister properties of cancer cells. Recently, an alternative paradigm for cAMP signaling has emerged in which growth factor–receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs; e.g., EGFR) access and modulate G proteins via a cytosolic guanine-nucleotide exchange modulator (GEM), GIV/girdin; dysregulation of this pathway is frequently encountered in cancers. In this study, we present a network-based compartmental model for the paradigm of GEM-facilitated cross-talk between RTKs and G proteins and how that impacts cellular cAMP. Our model predicts that cross-talk between GIV, Gαs, and Gαi proteins dampens ligand-stimulated cAMP dynamics. This prediction was experimentally verified by measuring cAMP levels in cells under different conditions. We further predict that the direct proportionality of cAMP concentration as a function of receptor number and the inverse proportionality of cAMP concentration as a function of PDE concentration are both altered by GIV levels. Taking these results together, our model reveals that GIV acts as a tunable control valve that regulates cAMP flux after growth factor stimulation. For a given stimulus, when GIV levels are high, cAMP levels are low, and vice versa. In doing so, GIV modulates cAMP via mechanisms distinct from the two most often targeted classes of cAMP modulators, GPCRs and PDEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Getz
- Chemical Engineering Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Lee Swanson
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Debashish Sahoo
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.,Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.,Moores Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Pradipta Ghosh
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.,Moores Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Padmini Rangamani
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tata P, Gondaliya P, Sunkaria A, Srivastava A, Kalia K. Modulation of CD44, EGFR and RAC Pathway Genes (WAVE Complex) in Epithelial Cancers. Curr Pharm Des 2019; 25:833-848. [PMID: 30799784 DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190222143044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cancer hallmarks help in understanding the diversity of various neoplasms. Epithelial cancers play an immense role in the tumor biology through Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) process. Receptor tyrosine kinase, as well as phosphatidyl ionositol-3 kinase pathways, play an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation during EMT. Till date, numerous studies have shown modulation in the expression profile of potential targets like CD44, EGFR, and Rac in epithelial cancers. CD44 interacts with EGFR and recruits other molecules which further activate the Rac pathway intermediates. This review mainly focused on modulation of genes like CD44, EGFR, and Rac pathway intermediates which play a crucial role in the tumor progression, metastasis, proliferation, and invasion characteristics in epithelial cancers with EMT properties. Hence, targeting Rac pathway might be a more strategically relevant approach in treating epithelial cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranathi Tata
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Palaj, Opposite Air Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382355, India
| | - Piyush Gondaliya
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Palaj, Opposite Air Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382355, India
| | - Aditya Sunkaria
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Palaj, Opposite Air Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382355, India
| | - Akshay Srivastava
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Palaj, Opposite Air Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382355, India
| | - Kiran Kalia
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Palaj, Opposite Air Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382355, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-Targeted Cancer Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19113491. [PMID: 30404198 PMCID: PMC6274851 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past two decades, several molecular targeted inhibitors have been developed and evaluated clinically to improve the survival of patients with cancer. Molecular targeted inhibitors inhibit the activities of pathogenic tyrosine kinases. Particularly, aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) activation is a potential therapeutic target. An increased understanding of genetics, cellular biology and structural biology has led to the development of numerous important therapeutics. Pathogenic RTK mutations, deletions, translocations and amplification/over-expressions have been identified and are currently being examined for their roles in cancers. Therapies targeting RTKs are categorized as small-molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Studies are underway to explore abnormalities in 20 types of RTK subfamilies in patients with cancer or other diseases. In this review, we describe representative RTKs important for developing cancer therapeutics and predicting or evaluated resistance mechanisms.
Collapse
|
10
|
Prognostic and predictive role of EGFR pathway alterations in biliary cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and anti-EGFR. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0191593. [PMID: 29352306 PMCID: PMC5774843 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The association of anti-EGFR to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy did not improve survival in biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) patients. Multiple mechanisms might be involved in the resistance to anti-EGFR. Here, we explored the mutation profile of EGFR extracellular domain (ECD), of tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), and its amplification status. EGFR mutational status of exons 12, 18–21 was analyzed in 57 tumors by Sanger sequencing. EGFR amplification was evaluated in 37 tumors by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated using the log-rank test. Six patients had mutations in exon 12 of EGFR ECD and 7 in EGFR TKD. Neither EGFR ECD nor TKD mutations affected progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in the entire population. In the panitumumab plus GEMOX (P-GEMOX) arm, ECD mutated patients had a worse OS, while EGFR TKD mutated patients had a trend towards shorter PFS and OS. Overall, the presence of mutations in EGFR or in its transducers did not affect PFS or OS, while the extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) mutated patients had a worse prognosis compared to WT. Nineteen out of 37 tumors were EGFR amplified, but the amplification did not correlate with survival. ECC EGFR amplified patients had improved OS, whereas the amplification significantly correlated with poor PFS (p = 0.03) in gallbladder carcinoma patients. The high molecular heterogeneity is a predominant feature of BTC: the alterations found in this work seem to have a prognostic impact rather than a predictive role towards anti-EGFR therapy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yamaoka T, Ohba M, Ohmori T. Molecular-Targeted Therapies for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Its Resistance Mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18112420. [PMID: 29140271 PMCID: PMC5713388 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18112420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer therapies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as small-molecule kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, have been developed as standard therapies for several cancers, such as non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Although these therapies can significantly prolong progression-free survival, curative effects are not often achieved because of intrinsic and/or acquired resistance. The resistance mechanisms to EGFR-targeted therapies can be categorized as resistant gene mutations, activation of alternative pathways, phenotypic transformation, and resistance to apoptotic cell death. Analysis of the processes that modulate EGFR signal transduction by EGFR-targeted inhibitors, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, has revealed new therapeutic opportunities and has elucidated novel mechanisms contributing to the discovery of more effective anticancer treatments. In this review, we discuss the roles of EGFR in cancer development, therapeutic strategies for targeting EGFR, and resistance mechanisms to EGFR-targeted therapies, with a focus on cancer therapies for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshimitsu Yamaoka
- Institute of Molecular Oncology, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan.
| | - Motoi Ohba
- Institute of Molecular Oncology, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan.
| | - Tohru Ohmori
- Institute of Molecular Oncology, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ning T, Zhang H, Wang X, Li S, Zhang L, Deng T, Zhou L, Liu R, Wang X, Bai M, Ge S, Li H, Huang D, Ying G, Ba Y. miR-370 regulates cell proliferation and migration by targeting EGFR in gastric cancer. Oncol Rep 2017; 38:384-392. [DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
13
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Bryan Rumble R, Temple-Smolkin R, B Ventura C, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:625-657. [PMID: 28165284 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0554-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES - To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. METHODS - The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. RESULTS - Twenty-one guideline statements were established. CONCLUSIONS - Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R Sepulveda
- From the 1 Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | | | - Carmen J Allegra
- 5 Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
| | - Wayne Grody
- 6 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - William K Funkhouser
- 8 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | | | - Christopher Lieu
- 9 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
| | | | - Bruce D Minsky
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Daniel J Sargent
- 12 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Joseph Willis
- 14 Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer Clark
- 15 ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
| | - Carol Colasacco
- 16 Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - R Bryan Rumble
- 17 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | - Christina B Ventura
- 16 Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - Jan A Nowak
- From the 1 Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY
- 2 Department of Pathology
- 3 Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- 5 Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
- 6 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- 7 Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
- 8 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
- 9 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
- 10 Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
- 11 Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX
- 12 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- 13 Biocept, San Diego, CA
- 14 Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- 15 ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
- 16 Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
- 17 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
- 18 Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD
- 19 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miao F, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Li X, Yao R, Wu F, Huang R, Li K, Miao S, Ma C, Ju H, Song W, Wang L. RHBDD1 upregulates EGFR via the AP-1 pathway in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:25251-25260. [PMID: 28445956 PMCID: PMC5421926 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Our previous study showed that RHBDD1 can activate the EGFR signaling pathway to promote colorectal cancer growth. In the present study, EGFR was decreased when RHBDD1 was knocked down or inactivated. Further analysis found that c-Jun and EGFR protein expression was decreased in RHBDD1 knockdown and inactivated cells. c-Jun overexpression in RHBDD1-inactivated cells rescued EGFR expression in a dose-dependent manner. RHBDD1 overexpression in RHBDD1-inactivated cells restored EGFR expression, but this effect was counteracted by c-Jun knockdown. Furthermore, EGFR and c-Jun were attenuated in the RHBDD1 knockdown and inactivated groups in animal tumor models. Tissue microarray assays demonstrated a correlation between RHBDD1 and EGFR in colorectal cancer patients. Therefore, our findings indicate that RHBDD1 stimulates EGFR expression by promoting the AP-1 pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Miao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Mengmeng Zhang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Yuechao Zhao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Xiaolu Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Rongyan Yao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Fan Wu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Rong Huang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Shiying Miao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Changwu Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng 024000, China
| | - Hongge Ju
- Department of Pathology, Baotou Medical College, Baotou 014040, China.,Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Baotou 014010, China
| | - Wei Song
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Linfang Wang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Rumble RB, Temple-Smolkin R, Ventura CB, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2017; 147:221-260. [PMID: 28165529 PMCID: PMC7263311 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. Methods: The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. Results: Twenty-one guideline statements were established. Conclusions: Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R. Sepulveda
- From theDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY; Departments of
| | | | - Carmen J. Allegra
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
| | - Wayne Grody
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - William K. Funkhouser
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | | | - Christopher Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
| | | | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | | | | - Joseph Willis
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer Clark
- ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | | | | | - Christina B. Ventura
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - Jan A. Nowak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Rumble RB, Temple-Smolkin R, Ventura CB, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Mol Diagn 2017; 19:187-225. [PMID: 28185757 PMCID: PMC5971222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. METHODS The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. RESULTS Twenty-one guideline statements were established. CONCLUSIONS Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented. Key Words: Molecular diagnostics; Gastrointestinal; Histology; Genetics; Oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R Sepulveda
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY.
| | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Carmen J Allegra
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
| | - Wayne Grody
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - William K Funkhouser
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | - Scott E Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Christopher Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
| | | | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Daniel J Sargent
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Joseph Willis
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer Clark
- ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | | | | | - Christina B Ventura
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Rumble RB, Temple-Smolkin R, Ventura CB, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1453-1486. [PMID: 28165299 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.9807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Molecular testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to improve patient care and outcomes of targeted and conventional therapies has been the center of many recent studies, including clinical trials. Evidence-based recommendations for the molecular testing of CRC tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -targeted therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens are warranted in clinical practice. The purpose of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing for CRC through a systematic review of the literature. Methods The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing, guide targeted therapies, and advance personalized care for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included over 4,000 articles was conducted to gather data to inform this guideline. Results Twenty-one guideline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established. Recommendations Evidence supports mutational testing for genes in the EGFR signaling pathway, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize molecular testing for predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers involve selection of assays, type of specimens to be tested, timing of ordering of tests and turnaround time for testing results. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/CRC-markers-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R Sepulveda
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Carmen J Allegra
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Wayne Grody
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Allison M Cushman-Vokoun
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - William K Funkhouser
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Scott E Kopetz
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Christopher Lieu
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Federico A Monzon
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Daniel J Sargent
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Veena M Singh
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Joseph Willis
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Jennifer Clark
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - R Bryan Rumble
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Robyn Temple-Smolkin
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Christina B Ventura
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Haddad J, Slika S, Mahfouz R. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the era of Precision Medicine: The tale of a perfect example of targeted therapy. A review. Meta Gene 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2016.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
19
|
Hatch AJ, Sibley AB, Starr MD, Brady JC, Jiang C, Jia J, Bowers DL, Pang H, Owzar K, Niedzwiecki D, Innocenti F, Venook AP, Hurwitz HI, Nixon AB. Blood-based markers of efficacy and resistance to cetuximab treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from CALGB 80203 (Alliance). Cancer Med 2016; 5:2249-60. [PMID: 27465221 PMCID: PMC5055181 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Revised: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Circulating protein markers were assessed in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with cetuximab in CALGB 80203 to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC received FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy (chemo) or chemo in combination with cetuximab. Baseline plasma samples from 152 patients were analyzed for six candidate markers [epidermal growth factor (EGF), heparin‐binding EGF (HBEGF), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER2, HER3, and CD73]. Analyte levels were associated with survival endpoints using univariate Cox proportional hazards models. Predictive markers were identified using a treatment‐by‐marker interaction term in the Cox model. Plasma levels of EGF, HBEGF, HER3, and CD73 were prognostic for overall survival (OS) across all patients (KRAS mutant and wild‐type). High levels of EGF predicted for lack of OS benefit from cetuximab in KRAS wild‐type (WT) patients (chemo HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.74–1.29; chemo+cetuximab HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.05–2.25; interaction P = 0.045) and benefit from cetuximab in KRAS mutant patients (chemo HR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.02–2.92; chemo+cetuximab HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.67–1.21; interaction P = 0.026). Across all patients, higher HER3 levels were associated with significant OS benefit from cetuximab treatment (chemo HR = 4.82, 95% CI = 1.68–13.84; chemo+cetuximab HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.31–2.95; interaction P = 0.046). CD73 was also identified as predictive of OS benefit in KRASWT patients (chemo HR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.88–1.84; chemo+cetuximab HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.32–1.13; interaction P = 0.049). Although these results are preliminary, and confirmatory studies are necessary before clinical application, the data suggest that HER3 and CD73 may play important roles in the biological response to cetuximab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ace J Hatch
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alexander B Sibley
- Duke Cancer Institute Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mark D Starr
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - J Chris Brady
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Chen Jiang
- Alliance Statistical and Data Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jingquan Jia
- East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | | | - Herbert Pang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.,School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kouros Owzar
- Duke Cancer Institute Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.,Alliance Statistical and Data Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Alliance Statistical and Data Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Alan P Venook
- University of California, San Francisco - Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Matsusaka S, Kobunai T, Yamamoto N, Chin K, Ogura M, Tanaka G, Matsuoka K, Ishikawa Y, Mizunuma N, Yamaguchi T. Prognostic impact of KRAS mutant type and MET amplification in metastatic and recurrent gastric cancer patients treated with first-line S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy. Genes Cancer 2016; 7:27-35. [PMID: 27014419 PMCID: PMC4773703 DOI: 10.18632/genesandcancer.96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-related genes, including HER2, EGFR, MET, FGFR2 and KRAS, are target molecules that are clinically beneficial in gastric cancer (GC). We investigated the correlation between RTK-related genes and the curative effect of first-line S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) combination chemotherapy in metastatic and recurrent GC. We enrolled 150 patients with histopathologically confirmed metastatic and recurrent GC treated with SP. KRAS mutation was detected using direct sequencing. DNA copy number was measured by real-time PCR. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens were examined immunohistochemically for HER2, EGFR, FGFR2 and MET. Among 144 patients, KRAS mutation was detected in five (3.5%) at codon 12 and one (0.7%) at codon 13. FGFR2, EGFR, HER2, MET and KRAS gene amplification was suggested in 4.4%, 5.9%, 9%, 3.7% and 10.3% of patients, respectively. KRAS mutation, but not KRAS amplification, was associated with significantly shorter overall and progression-free survival. MET membranous overexpression was associated with a significantly higher tumor response. MET amplification was associated with significantly shorter overall survival. We show for the first time that KRAS mutation and MET amplification are promising predictive markers in metastatic and recurrent GC patients treated with SP. KRAS status may be a useful prognostic marker in patients treated with SP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Matsusaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobunai
- Translational Research Laboratory, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Yamamoto
- Department of Pathology, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisho Chin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Ogura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gotaro Tanaka
- Applied Pharmacology Laboratory, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Matsuoka
- Translational Research Laboratory, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Ishikawa
- Department of Pathology, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Mizunuma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiharu Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu J, Hu J, Cheng L, Ren W, Yang M, Liu B, Xie L, Qian X. Biomarkers predicting resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS. Onco Targets Ther 2016; 9:557-65. [PMID: 26869800 PMCID: PMC4734822 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s86966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
EGFR pathway is an important therapeutic target in human tumors, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The advent of EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies panitumumab and cetuximab has generated promise for the treatment of mCRC and has largely improved patients' progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies is only effective in a subset of mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS. This indicates that there are other factors affecting the efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Existing studies have demonstrated that among colorectal cancer patients with wild-type KRAS, harboring mutations of BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, or PTEN-null may demonstrate resistance to anti-EGFR-targeted therapy, and biomarkers detection can provide better-personalized treatment for mCRC patients. How to identify and reverse the secondary resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy is also another great challenge to improve the anti-EGFR efficacy in wild-type KRAS mCRC patients. Finally, both of the molecular mechanisms of response and acquired resistance would be important for the directions of future research. This review focuses on how to further improve the predictive value of anti-EGFR therapies and how to also try and avoid futile treatment for wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Liu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Hu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Cheng
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Ren
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Mi Yang
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Baorui Liu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Xie
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoping Qian
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum-Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Higaki E, Kuwata T, Nagatsuma AK, Nishida Y, Kinoshita T, Aizawa M, Nitta H, Nagino M, Ochiai A. Gene copy number gain of EGFR is a poor prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer: evaluation of 855 patients with bright-field dual in situ hybridization (DISH) method. Gastric Cancer 2016; 19:63-73. [PMID: 25487305 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-014-0449-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EGFR overexpression is a prognostic biomarker and is expected to be a predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR therapies in gastric cancer. However, few studies have reported the clinical impact of EGFR gene copy number (GCN) and its correlation with EGFR overexpression. METHODS We used dual in situ hybridization (DISH) to detect EGFR GCN and chromosome 7 centromere (CEN7) in a set of tissue microarrays representing 855 patients with gastric cancer. These data were compared with those of immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of EGFR expression to evaluate prognostic value. RESULTS EGFR GCN gain (≥ 2.5 EGFR signals per cell) was detected in 194 patients (22.7%) and indicated poor prognosis. Among 194 patients, EGFR amplification (EGFR/CEN7 ≥ 2.0) was observed in 29 patients (14.9%), which was almost identical to the IHC 3+ subgroup and worst prognostic subgroup. Patients with EGFR GCN gain but not amplification, including those exhibiting polysomy, also exhibited poorer prognosis than GCN non-gain patients and were distributed between IHC 0/1+ and 2+ subgroups. GCN gain was frequently observed in patients with more advanced disease, but served as an independent prognostic factor regardless of the pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS EGFR GCN gain is a more accurate prognostic biomarker than EGFR overexpression in patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eiji Higaki
- Division of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kuwata
- Division of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Akiko Kawano Nagatsuma
- Division of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yasunori Nishida
- Division of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kinoshita
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masaki Aizawa
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, 2-15-3 Kawagishi-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8566, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nitta
- Technology and Applied Research, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., 1910 E Innovation Park Drive, Tucson, AZ, 85755, USA
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ochiai
- Division of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu FF. Colorectal cancer immunotherapy: Current clinical studies and prospect of clinical application. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2015; 23:4464-4472. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v23.i28.4464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a type of malignant gastrointestinal cancer with a high incidence rate. Current treatments, mostly surgery and chemotherapy, have not improved the 5-year survival rate of the patients significantly. About one-third of patients died of metastatic colorectal cancer eventually. Cancer immunotherapy has received more and more attention in recent years and become a hot research topic. Immunotherapy includes a variety of methods with an aim at improving the patient's own immune system and anti-tumor ability to control and kill tumor cells by the use of modern bio-technology. It has become the fourth form of cancer treatment after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This paper expounds the types of tumor immunotherapy, their applications in colorectal cancer, and the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of immunotherapy. In particular, we discuss the relationship between inflammation microenvironment and immunotherapy, and the relationship between chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Immunotherapy may become an important component of individualized treatment for colorectal cancer in the near future.
Collapse
|
24
|
Su YH, Ng KF, Yu MC, Wu TJ, Yeh TS, Lee WC, Lin YS, Hsieh TH, Lin CY, Yeh CT, Chen TC. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor protein and gene alteration on Taiwanese hepatocellular carcinomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 30:1397-404. [PMID: 25765471 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is associated with disease progression and poor survival in a variety of solid tumors. The role of EGFR in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. METHODS One hundred thirty-eight HCCs were analyzed for total EGFR (t-EGFR) and phospho-EGFR (p-EGFR) expression and gene amplification using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The role of EGFR was analyzed in relation to the clinicopathological features. RESULTS Weak to strong p-EGFR immunostaining was noted in 42 of the 138 HCCs. p-EGFR expression correlated with alcoholism (P = 0.03) and chronic hepatitis B infection (P = 0.041). There was no correlation between t-EGFR expression and any of the clinicopathological features. Amplification of the EGFR gene was not identified in the 138 HCCs, but 39.1% of the HCCs showed balanced polysomy of both the EGFR gene and centromere 7. Moreover, 65 tumors showed > 2.2 copies per tumor cell. EGFR copy number gain (CNG) was significantly correlated with gender (P = 0.0491), tumor grade (P = 0.006), and vascular invasion (P = 0.005). HCCs with EGFR CNG also had a poor recurrence-free survival (RFS), as compared with HCCs without EGFR CNG (P = 0.031). When exploring the impact of gender, a significant association of EGFR CNG was found with tumor grade (P = 0.044) and cirrhosis (P = 0.015) exclusively in the male group only; however, the OS and RFS analysis show no significant difference between male and female groups. CONCLUSIONS EGFR CNG was related to crucial clinicopathological features and early recurrence, indicating that EGFR CNG might be a poor prognosis factor for Taiwanese HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hung Su
- Cancer Diagnostic Laboratory, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Kwai-Fong Ng
- Department of Pathology, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chin Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Jung Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Sen Yeh
- Department of General Surgery, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Yong-Shiang Lin
- Department of Pathology, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Han Hsieh
- Department of Biobank, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yen Lin
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Chau-Ting Yeh
- Liver Research Center, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Tse-Ching Chen
- Cancer Diagnostic Laboratory, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.,Department of Pathology, Lin-Kou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Erstad DJ, Tumusiime G, Cusack JC. Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Implications for the Clinical Surgeon. Ann Surg Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4706-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
26
|
Stintzing S, Zhang W, Heinemann V, Neureiter D, Kemmerling R, Kirchner T, Jung A, Folwaczny M, Yang D, Ning Y, Sebio A, Stremitzer S, Sunakawa Y, Matsusaka S, Yamauchi S, Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Falcone A, Lenz HJ. Polymorphisms in Genes Involved in EGFR Turnover Are Predictive for Cetuximab Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2015. [PMID: 26206335 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Transmembrane receptors, such as the EGFR, are regulated by their turnover, which is dependent on the ubiquitin-proteasome system. We tested in two independent study cohorts whether SNPs in genes involved in EGFR turnover predict clinical outcome in cetuximab-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The following SNPs involved in EGFR degradation were analyzed in a screening cohort of 108 patients treated with cetuximab in the chemorefractory setting: c-CBL (rs7105971; rs4938637; rs4938638; rs251837), EPS15 (rs17567; rs7308; rs1065754), NAE1 (rs363169; rs363170; rs363172), SH3KBP1 (rs7051590; rs5955820; rs1017874; rs11795873), SGIP1 (rs604737; rs6570808; rs7526812), UBE2M (rs895364; rs895374), and UBE2L3 (rs5754216). SNPs showing an association with response or survival were analyzed in BRAF and RAS wild-type samples from the FIRE-3 study. One hundred and fifty-three FOLFIRI plus cetuximab-treated patients served as validation set, and 168 patients of the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab arm served as controls. EGFR FISH was done in 138 samples to test whether significant SNPs were associated with EGFR expression. UBE2M rs895374 was significantly associated with progression-free survival (log-rank P = 0.005; HR, 0.60) within cetuximab-treated patients. No association with bevacizumab-treated patients (n = 168) could be established (P = 0.56; HR, 0.90). rs895374 genotype did not affect EGFR FISH measurements. EGFR recycling is an interesting mechanism of secondary resistance to cetuximab in mCRC. This is the first report suggesting that germline polymorphisms in the degradation process predict efficacy of cetuximab in patients with mCRC. Genes involved in EGFR turnover may be new targets in the treatment of mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Stintzing
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California. Department for Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Wu Zhang
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department for Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK); German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ralf Kemmerling
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria. Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Trier, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK); German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Folwaczny
- Department of Preventive Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dongyun Yang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yan Ning
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ana Sebio
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Stremitzer
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yu Sunakawa
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California
| | - Satoshi Matsusaka
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shinichi Yamauchi
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California. Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fotios Loupakis
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2-Aziendo Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2-Aziendo Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alfredo Falcone
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2-Aziendo Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Sharon Carpenter Laboatory, Los Angeles, California. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Colorectal Cancer Classification and Cell Heterogeneity: A Systems Oncology Approach. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:13610-32. [PMID: 26084042 PMCID: PMC4490512 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160613610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease that manifests through diverse clinical scenarios. During many years, our knowledge about the variability of colorectal tumors was limited to the histopathological analysis from which generic classifications associated with different clinical expectations are derived. However, currently we are beginning to understand that under the intense pathological and clinical variability of these tumors there underlies strong genetic and biological heterogeneity. Thus, with the increasing available information of inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity, the classical pathological approach is being displaced in favor of novel molecular classifications. In the present article, we summarize the most relevant proposals of molecular classifications obtained from the analysis of colorectal tumors using powerful high throughput techniques and devices. We also discuss the role that cancer systems biology may play in the integration and interpretation of the high amount of data generated and the challenges to be addressed in the future development of precision oncology. In addition, we review the current state of implementation of these novel tools in the pathological laboratory and in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
28
|
Lee EK, Song KA, Chae JH, Kim KM, Kim SH, Kang MS. GAGE12 mediates human gastric carcinoma growth and metastasis. Int J Cancer 2014; 136:2284-92. [PMID: 25346337 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The spontaneous metastasis from human gastric carcinoma (GC) remains poorly reproduced in animal models. Here, we established an experimental mouse model in which GC progressively developed in the orthotopic stomach wall and metastasized to multiple organs; the tumors colonized in the ovary exhibited typical characteristics of Krukenberg tumor. The expression of mesenchymal markers was low in primary tumors and high in those in intravasating and extravasating veins. However, the expression of epithelial markers did not differ, indicating that the acquisition of mesenchymal markers without a concordant loss of typical epithelial markers was associated with metastasis. We identified 35 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in GC cells metastasized to ovary, among which overexpression of GAGE12 family genes, the top-ranked DEGs, were validated. In addition, knockdown of the GAGE12 gene family affected transcription of many of the aforementioned 35 DEGs and inhibited trans-well migration, tumor sphere formation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. In accordance, GAGE12 overexpression augmented migration, tumor sphere formation and sustained in vivo tumor growth. Taken together, the GAGE12 gene family promotes GC growth and metastasis by modulating the expression of GC metastasis-related genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Kyung Lee
- Samsung Biomedical Research Institute (SBRI), Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
EGFR inhibitors and autophagy in cancer treatment. Tumour Biol 2014; 35:11701-9. [PMID: 25293518 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2660-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor treatment is a strategy for cancer therapy. However, innate and acquired resistance is a major obstacle of the efficacy. Autophagy is a self-digesting process in cells, which is considered to be associated with anti-cancer drug resistance. The activation of EGFR can regulate autophagy through multiple signal pathways. EGFR inhibitors can induce autophagy, but the specific function of the induction of autophagy by EGFR inhibitors remains biphasic. On the one hand, autophagy induced by EGFR inhibitors acts as a cytoprotective response in cancer cells, and autophagy inhibitors can enhance the cytotoxic effects of EGFR inhibitors. On the other hand, a high level of autophagy after treatment of EGFR inhibitors can also result in autophagic cell death lacking features of apoptosis, and the combination of EGFR inhibitors with an autophagy inducer might be beneficial. Thus, autophagy regulation represents a promising approach for improving the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of cancer patients.
Collapse
|
30
|
Stiegelbauer V, Perakis S, Deutsch A, Ling H, Gerger A, Pichler M. MicroRNAs as novel predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:11727-11735. [PMID: 25206276 PMCID: PMC4155362 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2014] [Revised: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 06/05/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in western countries. Despite significant improvement in available treatment options, CRC still remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Traditionally, 5-fluorouracil has been used as the main chemotherapy drug for treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, during the last two decades more effective chemotherapeutic agents such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan and the monoclonal antibodies cetuximab, panitumumab and bevacizumab have been used in clinical practice. More recently, the therapeutic armamentarium has been supplemented by the monoclonal antibodies bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab as well as the protein-trap aflibercept and the small molecule multi-kinase inhibitor regorafenib. One of the major problems for the management of CRC is the inherent or acquired resistance to therapeutic approaches. The discovery of microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small, endogenous, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs that play a role as post-transcriptional regulators, has added new dimensions to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Because miRNAs are important regulators of carcinogenesis, progression, invasion, angiogenesis and metastases in CRC, they might serve as potential predictive and prognostic factors and even as therapeutic targets themselves. Several miRNAs are already known to be dysregulated in CRCs and have been linked to biological processes involved in tumor progression and response to anti-cancer therapies. This review summarizes current therapeutic approaches for treating CRC and highlights the role of miRNAs as novel predictive biomarkers and potential drug targets in CRC patients.
Collapse
|
31
|
Jeong WJ, Cha PH, Choi KY. Strategies to overcome resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:9862-9871. [PMID: 25110417 PMCID: PMC4123368 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2013] [Revised: 01/14/2014] [Accepted: 04/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) such as cetuximab and panitumumab in combination with conventional chemotherapy substantially prolongs survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the efficacy of these mAbs is limited due to genetic variation among patients, in particular K-ras mutations. The discovery of K-ras mutation as a predictor of non-responsiveness to EGFR mAb therapy has caused a major change in the treatment of mCRC. Drugs that inhibit transformation caused by oncogenic alterations of Ras and its downstream components such as BRAF, MEK and AKT seem to be promising cancer therapeutics as single agents or when given with EGFR inhibitors. Although multiple therapeutic strategies to overcome EGFR mAb-resistance are under investigation, our understanding of their mode of action is limited. Rational drug development based on stringent preclinical data, biomarker validation, and proper selection of patients is of paramount importance in the treatment of mCRC. In this review, we will discuss diverse approaches to overcome the problem of resistance to existing anti-EGFR therapies and potential future directions for cancer therapies related to the mutational status of genes associated with EGFR-Ras-ERK and PI3K signalings.
Collapse
|
32
|
Kumar SS, Price TJ, Townsend AR, Hocking C, Hardingham JE. Predictive biomarkers of response to anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibody therapies. COLORECTAL CANCER 2014. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.14.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY The EGF receptor (EGFR) pathway plays an important role in the progression of several carcinomas, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The EGFR has emerged as a candidate for targeted therapy for CRC. Two monoclonal antibodies used to inhibit the EGFR signaling pathway are cetuximab and panitumumab. Both these monoclonal antibodies inhibit tumor-promoting activities, such as tumor cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis and metastasis. However, only a subpopulation of metastatic CRC patients responds to such therapy. Constitutive activation within the pathway gives rise to other aberrantly expressed biomarkers that are able to circumvent the anti-EGFR treatment and confer resistance. Mechanisms of resistance and the value of these emerging predictive biomarkers in the clinical setting are discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini Sree Kumar
- Hematology–Oncology Department, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
- Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Timothy J Price
- Medical Oncology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Amanda R Townsend
- Medical Oncology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Christopher Hocking
- Medical Oncology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Jennifer E Hardingham
- Hematology–Oncology Department, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
- Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Des mutations de KRAS aux mutations de RAS : vers une meilleure définition de la réponse aux anticorps anti-EGFR dans le cancer colorectal métastatique. ONCOLOGIE 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s10269-014-2376-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
34
|
Koido S, Ohkusa T, Homma S, Namiki Y, Takakura K, Saito K, Ito Z, Kobayashi H, Kajihara M, Uchiyama K, Arihiro S, Arakawa H, Okamoto M, Gong J, Tajiri H. Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:8531-8542. [PMID: 24379570 PMCID: PMC3870498 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2013] [Revised: 10/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/19/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is on the rise, and the prognosis for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease is extremely poor. Although chemotherapy and radiation therapy can improve survival rates, it is imperative to integrate alternative strategies such as immunotherapy to improve outcomes for patients with advanced CRC. In this review, we will discuss the effect of immunotherapy for inducing cytotoxic T lymphocytes and the major immunotherapeutic approaches for CRC that are currently in clinical trials, including peptide vaccines, dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines, whole tumor cell vaccines, viral vector-based cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer therapy, antibody-based cancer immunotherapy, and cytokine therapy. The possibility of combination therapies will also be discussed along with the challenges presented by tumor escape mechanisms.
Collapse
|
35
|
Genetic and immune factors underlying the efficacy of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2013; 18:7-16. [PMID: 24876815 PMCID: PMC4037996 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2013.38566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 10/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Efficacy of monoclonal anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab) used in combination with chemotherapy or alone has been demonstrated in clinical trials of patients with mCRC. Both drugs block signaling EGFR pathway in malignant cells (blocking ligand binding and EGFR dimerization). Obtaining treatment responses with anti-EGFR agents is possible only in a selected subgroup of patients with mCRC. Successful treatment with cetuximab and panitumab is possible almost exclusively in patients without RAS mutations. Research on predictive value of EGFR gene copy number, PI3KCA gene mutations, P53 and PTEN, and EGFR their ligands concentrations is ongoing. Cetuximab, as IgG1 class antibody, can cause antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity against neoplasm cells, while panitumumab, as IgG2 class antibody, does not induce such effect. Therefore a potential predictor cetuximab therapy may be the presence of different polymorphic forms of the genes for receptor immunoglobulin Fc fragments: FcγRIIa and FcγRIII subclasses.
Collapse
|
36
|
Huang SH, Li Y, Chen HG, Rong J, Ye S. Activation of Proteinase-Activated Receptor 2 Prevents Apoptosis of Lung Cancer Cells. Cancer Invest 2013; 31:578-81. [DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2013.845674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
37
|
Shaib W, Mahajan R, El-Rayes B. Markers of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2013; 4:308-18. [PMID: 23997942 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a therapeutic target in colorectal cancer (CRC). The benefit from EGFR inhibitors appears to be limited to a subset of patients with CRC. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR inhibitors are being identified. KRAS codon 12 activating mutation is a predominate mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibitors in around 40% of patients with advanced CRC. Other potential mechanisms of resistance include ligand expression, increased EGFR number, mutations of BRAF and activation of alternate signaling pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walid Shaib
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Haraldsdottir S, Bekaii-Saab T. Integrating anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2013; 4:285-98. [PMID: 23997940 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer remains one of the most common causes of cancer diagnoses and mortality in the United States. The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer has evolved significantly over the last decade with near-tripling of patient survival rate. A significant contribution to this outcome was the advent of novel targeted agents, such as the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitors. In an era of emphasis on refining therapy, the presence of KRAS mutation will predict for resistance and limit exposure to patients who are more likely to benefit. In contrast, the presence of BRAF mutations does not seem to have a predictive value. Agents that are thought to reverse resistance to EGFR inhibitors such as those targeting PI3K, c-MET or IGF-1R are currently under study. EGFR inhibitors have exhibited single agent activity, and seem to synergize very well with standard chemotherapy except for cetuximab and 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). Preliminary data suggests that EGFR inhibitors have similar effectiveness to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in the first line setting. Skin toxicity remains the main limiting factor for the utilization of EGFR inhibitors, but strategies including the use of agents such as minocycline or doxycycline added to topical care seem to limit the severity of the rash.
Collapse
|
39
|
Hong L, Han Y, Brain L. Epidermal growth factor receptor: an important target in esophageal cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2013; 17:1179-85. [PMID: 23855932 DOI: 10.1517/14728222.2013.820709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Even after complete tumor removal by surgery, the clinical outcomes remain poor in patients with advanced esophageal cancer, justifying the need for new treatment options. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a molecular target for antibody-based therapy in various cancer types, and it may play important roles in the development of esophageal cancer. AREAS COVERED This review evaluates the expression, function, and mechanism of EGFR in esophageal cancer and analyzes its value for the prognosis and therapy of esophageal cancer. Future developments toward the clinical applications of EGFR to cancer treatment are also envisaged. EXPERT OPINION EGFR may function as an ideal therapeutic target for esophageal cancer. Further investigation of epidermal growth-factor-receptor-mediated pathways will push insight into the novel strategies of target therapy for esophageal cancer. More clinical trials should be performed to promote the success of therapeutic-clinical use of EGFR and its targets in esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu Hong
- Fourth Military Medical University, Xijing Hospital, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology , Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi Province , China +86 29 84773974 ; +86 29 82539041 ;
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Morotti M, Becker CM, Menada MV, Ferrero S. Targeting tyrosine-kinases in ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2013; 22:1265-79. [PMID: 23815710 DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2013.816282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of gynaecologic cancer death. Although in some cases initial treatment is effective, most of the women diagnosed with EOC will probably need medical treatment for their disease. There is a critical need to develop effective new strategies for the management of patients with advanced or recurrent EOC, and targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has continued to be an area of active research and development in this setting. AREAS COVERED This review summarises the available evidence on the use of TKIs in the clinical management of women with EOC. This article consists of material obtained via Medline, PubMed and EMBASE literature searches up to March 2013. EXPERT OPINION Several Phase I/II and III trials evaluated TKIs in EOC; however, it is difficult to draw conclusions on the efficacy of TKI regimens in these patients. TKIs seem to be better tolerated than conventional chemotherapy with a different toxicity profile. A better understanding of the signalling pathways, the toxicity profiles, the potential pharmacokinetic interactions as well as the identification of predictive biomarkers are needed to better identify a targeted patient population before these agents become part of routine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Morotti
- University of Genoa, San Martino Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Largo R. Benzi 1, 16132 Genoa , Italy +01139010511525 ; +01139010511525 ;
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|