Histological and clinical findings in patients with post-transplantation and classical encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: a European multicenter study

Peritoneal transformation shortly after kidney transplantation in pediatric patients with preceding chronic peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

The unphysiological composition of peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluids induces progressive peritoneal fibrosis, hypervascularization and vasculopathy. Information on these alterations after kidney transplantation (KTx) is scant.

METHODS

Parietal peritoneal tissues were obtained from 81 pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5), 72 children on PD with low glucose degradation product (GDP) PD fluids, and from 20 children 4-8 weeks after KTx and preceding low-GDP PD. Tissues were analyzed by digital histomorphometry and quantitative immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

While chronic PD was associated with peritoneal hypervascularization, after KTx vascularization was comparable to CKD5 level. Submesothelial CD45 counts were 40% lower compared with PD, and in multivariable analyses independently associated with microvessel density. In contrast, peritoneal mesothelial denudation, submesothelial thickness and fibrin abundance, number of activated, submesothelial fibroblasts and of mesothelial-mesenchymal transitioned cells were similar after KTx. Diffuse peritoneal podoplanin positivity was present in 40% of the transplanted patients. In subgroups matched for age, PD vintage, dialytic glucose exposure and peritonitis incidence, submesothelial hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha abundance and angiopoietin 1/2 ratio were lower after KTx, reflecting vessel maturation, while arteriolar and microvessel p16 and cleaved Casp3 were higher. Submesothelial mast cell count and interleukin-6 were lower, whereas transforming growth factor-beta induced pSMAD2/3 was similar as compared with children on PD.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal membrane damage induced with chronic administration of low-GDP PD fluids was less severe after KTx. While peritoneal microvessel density, primarily defining PD transport and ultrafiltration capacity, was normal after KTx and peritoneal inflammation less pronounced, diffuse podoplanin positivity and profibrotic activity were prevalent.

Encapsulated Peritoneal Sclerosis in an Adolescent With Kidney Transplant After Long-Term Peritoneal Dialysis

Encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis is a rare complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis that has a high rate of morbidity and mortality. We present an 18-year-old female patient who was first diagnosed with renal failure at 8 years of age and who had 7 years of peritoneal dialysis and then hemodialysis before kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Before transplant, the patient developed encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis and was treated with tamoxifen and steroids. Three years after transplant, the patient presented with complaints of vomiting, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension and was again diagnosed with encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis. The patient required excretory paracentesis, pulse steroid treatment for 3 days, and treatment with methylprednisone and tamoxifen, which resulted in regression of signs and symptoms. Factors such as long-term peritoneal dialysis, a history of bacterial peritonitis, and use of high-concentration dialysate may cause encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis, but symptoms can recur after transplant, as shown in our patient. Thus, it is important to recognize that encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis may cause graft loss due to the various complications that it can cause.

Traduction des Recommandations de l'ISPD pour l'évaluation du dysfonctionnement de la membrane péritonéale chez l'adulte

Informations concernant cette traductionDans le cadre d’un accord de partenariat entre l’ISPD et le RDPLF, le RDPLF est le traducteur français officiel des recommandations de l’ISPD. La traduction ne donne lieu à aucune compensation financière de la part de chaque société et le RDPLF s’est engagé à traduire fidèlement le texte original sous la responsabilité de deux néphrologues connus pour leur expertise dans le domaine. Avant publication le texte a été soumis à l’accord de l’ISPD. La traduction est disponible sur le site de l’ISPD et dans le Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile.Le texte est, comme l’original, libremement téléchargeable sous licence copyright CC By 4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Cette traduction est destinée à aider les professionnels de la communauté francophone à prendre connaissance des recommandations de l’ISPD dans leur langue maternelle. Toute référence dans un article doit se faire au texte original en accès libre :Peritoneal Dialysis International https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860820982218 Dans les articles rédigés pour des revues françaises, conserver la référence à la version originale anglaise ci dessus, mais ajouter «version française  https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v4i3.62673"»TraducteursDr Christian Verger, néphrologue, président du RDPLFRDPLF, 30 rue Sere Depoin, 95300 Pontoise – FranceProfesseur Max Dratwa, néphrologueHôpital Universitaire Brugmann – Bruxelles – Belgique

ISPD recommendations for the evaluation of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in adults: Classification, measurement, interpretation and rationale for intervention

Lay summary

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) uses the peritoneal membrane for dialysis. The peritoneal membrane is a thin layer of tissue that lines the abdomen. The lining is used as a filter to help remove extra fluid and poisonous waste from the blood. Everybody is unique. What is normal for one person’s membrane may be very different from another person’s. The kidney care team wants to provide each person with the best dialysis prescription for them and to do this they must evaluate the person’s peritoneal lining. Sometimes dialysis treatment itself can cause the membrane to change after some years. This means more assessments (evaluations) will be needed to determine whether the person’s peritoneal membrane has changed. Changes in the membrane may require changes to the dialysis prescription. This is needed to achieve the best dialysis outcomes. A key tool for these assessments is the peritoneal equilibration test (PET). It is a simple, standardized and reproducible tool. This tool is used to measure the peritoneal function soon after the start of dialysis. The goal is to understand how well the peritoneal membrane works at the start of dialysis. Later on in treatment, the PET helps to monitor changes in peritoneal function. If there are changes between assessments causing problems, the PET data may explain the cause of the dysfunction. This may be used to change the dialysis prescription to achieve the best outcomes. The most common problem with the peritoneal membrane occurs when fluid is not removed as well as it should be. This happens when toxins (poisons) in the blood cross the membrane more quickly than they should. This is referred to as a fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR). Since more efficient fluid removal is associated with better outcomes, developing a personal PD prescription based on the person’s PSTR is critically important. A less common problem happens when the membrane fails to work properly (also called membrane dysfunction) because the peritoneal membrane is less efficient, either at the start of treatment or developing after some years. If membrane dysfunction gets worse over time, then this is associated with progressive damage, scarring and thickening of the membrane. This problem can be identified through another change of the PET. It is called reduced ‘sodium dip’. Membrane dysfunction of this type is more difficult to treat and has many implications for the individual. If the damage is major, the person may need to stop PD. They would need to begin haemodialysis treatment (also spelled hemodialysis). This is a very important and emotional decision for individuals with kidney failure. Any decision that involves stopping PD therapy or transitioning to haemodialysis therapy should be made jointly between the clinical team, the person on dialysis and a caregiver, if requested. Although evidence is lacking about how often tests should be performed to determine peritoneal function, it seems reasonable to repeat them whenever there is difficulty in removing the amount of fluid necessary for maintaining the health and well-being of the individual. Whether routine evaluation of membrane function is associated with better outcomes has not been studied. Further research is needed to answer this important question as national policies in many parts of the world and the COVID-19 has placed a greater emphasis and new incentives encouraging the greater adoption of home dialysis therapies, especially PD. For Chinese and Spanish Translation of the Lay Summary, see Online Supplement Appendix 1.

Key recommendations

Guideline 1:

A pathophysiological taxonomy: A pathophysiological classification of membrane dysfunction, which provides mechanistic links to functional characteristics, should be used when prescribing individualized dialysis or when planning modality transfer (e.g. to automated peritoneal dialysis (PD) or haemodialysis) in the context of shared and informed decision-making with the person on PD, taking individual circumstances and treatment goals into account. (practice point)

Guideline 2a:

Identification of fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR): It is recommended that the PSTR is determined from a 4-h peritoneal equilibration test (PET), using either 2.5%/2.27% or 4.25%/3.86% dextrose/glucose concentration and creatinine as the index solute. (practice point) This should be done early in the course dialysis treatment (between 6 weeks and 12 weeks) (GRADE 1A) and subsequently when clinically indicated. (practice point)

Guideline 2b:

Clinical implications and mitigation of fast solute transfer: A faster PSTR is associated with lower survival on PD. (GRADE 1A) This risk is in part due to the lower ultrafiltration (UF) and increased net fluid reabsorption that occurs when the PSTR is above the average value. The resulting lower net UF can be avoided by shortening glucose-based exchanges, using a polyglucose solution (icodextrin), and/or prescribing higher glucose concentrations. (GRADE 1A) Compared to glucose, use of icodextrin can translate into improved fluid status and fewer episodes of fluid overload. (GRADE 1A) Use of automated PD and icodextrin may mitigate the mortality risk associated with fast PSTR. (practice point)

Guideline 3:

Recognizing low UF capacity: This is easy to measure and a valuable screening test. Insufficient UF should be suspected when either (a) the net UF from a 4-h PET is <400 ml (3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose) or <100 ml (2.27% glucose /2.5% dextrose), (GRADE 1B) and/or (b) the daily UF is insufficient to maintain adequate fluid status. (practice point) Besides membrane dysfunction, low UF capacity can also result from mechanical problems, leaks or increased fluid absorption across the peritoneal membrane not explained by fast PSTR.

Guideline 4a:

Diagnosing intrinsic membrane dysfunction (manifesting as low osmotic conductance to glucose) as a cause of UF insufficiency: When insufficient UF is suspected, the 4-h PET should be supplemented by measurement of the sodium dip at 1 h using a 3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose exchange for diagnostic purposes. A sodium dip ≤5 mmol/L and/or a sodium sieving ratio ≤0.03 at 1 h indicates UF insufficiency. (GRADE 2B)

Guideline 4b:

Clinical implications of intrinsic membrane dysfunction (de novo or acquired): in the absence of residual kidney function, this is likely to necessitate the use of hypertonic glucose exchanges and possible transfer to haemodialysis. Acquired membrane injury, especially in the context of prolonged time on treatment, should prompt discussions about the risk of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. (practice point)

Guideline 5:

Additional membrane function tests: measures of peritoneal protein loss, intraperitoneal pressure and more complex tests that estimate osmotic conductance and ‘lymphatic’ reabsorption are not recommended for routine clinical practice but remain valuable research methods. (practice point)

Guideline 6:

Socioeconomic considerations: When resource constraints prevent the use of routine tests, consideration of membrane function should still be part of the clinical management and may be inferred from the daily UF in response to the prescription. (practice point)

Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis: Pathophysiology and Current Treatment Options

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a life-threatening complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD), which may even occur after patients have switched to hemodialysis (HD) or undergone kidney transplantation. The incidence of EPS varies across the globe and increases with PD vintage. Causative factors are the chronic exposure to bioincompatible PD solutions, which cause long-term modifications of the peritoneum, a high peritoneal transporter status involving high glucose concentrations, peritonitis episodes, and smoldering peritoneal inflammation. Additional potential causes are predisposing genetic factors and some medications. Clinical symptoms comprise signs of intestinal obstruction and a high peritoneal transporter status with incipient ultrafiltration failure. In radiological, macro-, and microscopic studies, a massively fibrotic and calcified peritoneum enclosed the intestine and parietal wall in such cases. Empirical treatments commonly used are corticosteroids and tamoxifen, which has fibrinolytic properties. Immunosuppressants like azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or mTOR inhibitors may also help with reducing inflammation, fibrin deposition, and collagen synthesis and maturation. In animal studies, N-acetylcysteine, colchicine, rosiglitazone, thalidomide, and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors yielded promising results. Surgical treatment has mainly been performed in severe cases of intestinal obstruction, with varying results. Mortality rates are still 25–55% in adults and about 14% in children. To reduce the incidence of EPS and improve the outcome of this devastating complication of chronic PD, vigorous consideration of the risk factors, early diagnosis, and timely discontinuation of PD and therapeutic interventions are mandatory, even though these are merely based on empirical evidence.

Incidence and outcomes of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) and factors associated with severe EPS

BACKGROUND

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare but serious complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, previous studies reported large variations in its mortality rates that may associate with a different degree of EPS severity. This study reports the incidence and outcomes of EPS and identifies the risk factors associated with severe EPS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of EPS patients from 3 medical centers in Taiwan from January 1982 to September 2015, and classified patients as having mild/moderate or severe EPS. Patients with intractable intestinal obstruction/gut-related sepsis that needed surgical intervention or resulted in mortality were in severe EPS group. Follow-up for outcome was through December 31, 2015. Clinical characteristics, peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related parameters, biochemical and imaging results were analyzed and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight of 3202 patients undergoing PD during the study period had EPS (prevalence 1.8%). The incidence of EPS increased for patients on PD for >6-8 years (≤6 yrs. vs. >6-8 yrs., 0.0% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.001). Relative to those on PD for >6-8 years, the risk of EPS significantly increased with PD duration longer than 10 years (>10-12 years vs. >6-8 years: OR: 5.5, 95% CI: 1.7-17.1, p < 0.01). Twenty-three patients fulfilled the criteria for severe EPS. The overall mortality rate of EPS was 35% (20/58), and was 74% (17/23) in the severe EPS group. The average serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and intact-parathyroid hormone (i-PTH), which were checked every 3~6 months within one year before diagnosis of EPS, were higher in severe EPS group than in mild/moderate group (p = 0.02, p = 0.08, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed severe EPS was independently associated with bowel tethering (based on CT), presentation with bloody ascites, diagnosis of EPS after withdrawal from PD, and i-PTH ≥ 384 pg/mL. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that presentation with 2 or more of the 5 risk factors (EPS diagnosis after PD withdrawal, bloody ascites, bowel tethering, CRP ≥ 29 mg/L, and i-PTH ≥ 384 pg/mL) had a good accuracy (AUC = 0.80, p = 0.001) for prediction of severe EPS.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of EPS increases with PD duration. Severe EPS has high mortality rate and is associated with bowel tethering, presentation of bloody ascites, diagnosis after PD withdrawal, and higher serum levels of i-PTH before EPS diagnosis. Having 2 or more of the 5 risk factors can provide a good accuracy for prediction of severe EPS.

Absence of Post-Transplantation Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis after Relatively Short Exposure to Peritoneal Dialysis: Prospective Analysis Using Repeated Abdominal CT Scanning

BACKGROUND

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is the most severe complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Several retrospective reports published between 2007 and 2009 have suggested an increasing incidence of EPS occurring after kidney transplantation. We conducted a prospective observational study to determine the incidence of post-transplantation EPS and identify possible risk factors.

METHODS

Consecutive PD patients undergoing kidney transplantation between 2009 and 2013 were included. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis was defined as gastrointestinal obstruction combined with radiological evidence of EPS. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using a self-administered Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed prospectively at 6 and 18 months post-transplantation. The primary end point was EPS during follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-three PD patients were included (age 51 ± 14 years). Mean PD duration was 31.3 months. Peritoneal dialysis solutions low in glucose degradation products and icodextrin were used by 86.8% of patients. A fast or average-fast transport status was documented in 83.0%. After a median follow-up of 19 months, complete data of 47 patients were available for analysis. None of the patients developed clinical or radiological signs of EPS. The GSRS score improved from 1.87 to 1.55 (p = 0.024) and body weight increased from 75.9 to 78.3 kg (p = 0.003). Only 1 patient had new onset localized (< 20%) peritoneal thickening on CT 22 months post-transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Post-transplantation EPS did not develop in this cohort of patients with a relatively short time of PD exposure. This suggests that these patients can be transplanted safely without concern for the development of EPS, at least within the follow-up period of 19 months.

CD147 expression in peritoneal injury

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal injury is an important cause of technical failure of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe complication of long-term PD with potentially life threatening consequences. CD147 is a glycoprotein with diverse functions including modulation of extracellular matrix via induction of matrix metalloproteinases, cell adhesion, and regulation of immune reactions. We hypothesized that CD 147 plays a role in the peritoneal cavity.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we localized CD147 by immunohistochemistry in peritoneal biopsies from uremic patients not on PD (n = 8), on PD without signs of EPS (n = 7), and in biopsies in patients with the diagnosis of EPS (n = 7). Double immunofluorescence was used to co-localize α-smooth-muscle actin (α-SMA) and CD147 in selected biopsies from each group. Expression was scored semi-quantitatively.

RESULTS

In biopsies from uremic controls, CD147 was prominently expressed in mesothelial cells, focally between fat cells and by some perivascular cells. In patients on PD, a similar distribution was present (although mesothelium was rarely conserved), with some focal accentuation. In EPS, layers of fibroblastic cells were positive for CD147. EPS biopsies demonstrated a significantly higher score in a blinded evaluation, compared to uremic patients. Cells expressing CD147 were α-SMA positive myofibroblasts as demonstrated by double immunofluorescence. Mean CD147 scores did not differ between patients with different transporter status.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study demonstrating CD147 on a major part of fibroblastic cells in EPS. Future studies need to address the role of these cells in this severe complication of long-term PD.

Recommendations for pathological diagnosis on biopsy samples from peritoneal dialysis patients

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been established as an essential renal replacement therapy for patients with end stage renal disease during the past half century. Histological evaluation of the peritoneal membrane has contributed to the pathophysiological understanding of PD-related peritoneal injury such as peritonitis, fibrosis, and encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS). Hyalinizing peritoneal sclerosis (HPS), also known as simple sclerosis, is observed in almost all of PD patients. HPS is morphologically characterized by fibrosis of the submesothelial interstitium and hyalinizing vascular wall, particularly of the post-capillary venule (PCV). Two histological factors, the thickness of submesothelial compact zone (SMC) and the lumen/vessel ratio (L/V) at the PCV, have been used for the quantitative evaluation of HPS. The measuring system on SMC thickness and L/V ratio is easy and useful for evaluating the severity of HPS. On the other hand, EPS is characterized by unique encapsulation of the intestines by an "encapsulating membrane". This newly formed membranous structure covers the visceral peritoneum of the intestines, which contains fibrin deposition, angiogenesis, and proliferation of fibroblast-like cells and other inflammatory cells. This review will cover the common understandings of PD-related peritoneal alterations and provide a basic platform for clinical applications and future studies in this field.

Preventing peritoneal membrane fibrosis in peritoneal dialysis patients

Long-term peritoneal dialysis causes morphologic and functional changes in the peritoneal membrane. Although mesothelial-mesenchymal transition of peritoneal mesothelial cells is a key process leading to peritoneal fibrosis, and bioincompatible peritoneal dialysis solutions (glucose, glucose degradation products, and advanced glycation end products or a combination) are responsible for altering mesothelial cell function and proliferation, mechanisms underlying these processes remain largely unclear. Peritoneal fibrosis has 2 cooperative parts, the fibrosis process itself and the inflammation. The link between these 2 processes is frequently bidirectional, with each one inducing the other. This review outlines our current understanding about the definition and pathophysiology of peritoneal fibrosis, recent studies on key fibrogenic molecular machinery in peritoneal fibrosis, such as the role of transforming growth factor-β/Smads, transforming growth factor-β β/Smad independent pathways, and noncoding RNAs. The diagnosis of peritoneal fibrosis, including effluent biomarkers and the histopathology of a peritoneal biopsy, which is the gold standard for demonstrating peritoneal fibrosis, is introduced in detail. Several interventions for peritoneal fibrosis based on biomarkers, cytology, histology, functional studies, and antagonists are presented in this review. Recent experimental trials in animal models, including pharmacology and gene therapy, which could offer novel insights into the treatment of peritoneal fibrosis in the near future, are also discussed in depth.

Quantitative Histomorphometry of the Healthy Peritoneum

The peritoneum plays an essential role in preventing abdominal frictions and adhesions and can be utilized as a dialysis membrane. Its physiological ultrastructure, however, has not yet been studied systematically. 106 standardized peritoneal and 69 omental specimens were obtained from 107 patients (0.1–60 years) undergoing surgery for disease not affecting the peritoneum for automated quantitative histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. The mesothelial cell layer morphology and protein expression pattern is similar across all age groups. Infants below one year have a thinner submesothelium; inflammation, profibrotic activity and mesothelial cell translocation is largely absent in all age groups. Peritoneal blood capillaries, lymphatics and nerve fibers locate in three distinct submesothelial layers. Blood vessel density and endothelial surface area follow a U-shaped curve with highest values in infants below one year and lowest values in children aged 7–12 years. Lymphatic vessel density is much lower, and again highest in infants. Omental blood capillary density correlates with parietal peritoneal findings, whereas only few lymphatic vessels are present. The healthy peritoneum exhibits major thus far unknown particularities, pertaining to functionally relevant structures, and subject to substantial changes with age. The reference ranges established here provide a framework for future histomorphometric analyses and peritoneal transport modeling approaches.