Extraretinal induced visual sensations during IMRT of the brain

Light flashes and other sensory illusions perceived in space travel and on ground, including proton and heavy ion therapies

Most of the astronauts experience visual illusions, apparent flashes of light (LF) in absence of light. The first reported observation of this phenomenon was in July 1969 by Buzz Aldrin, in the debriefing following the Apollo 11 mission. Several ground-based experiments in the 1970s tried to clarify the mechanisms behind these light flashes and to evaluate possible related risks. These works were supported by dedicated experiments in space on the following Apollo flights and in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). It was soon demonstrated that the LF could be caused by charged particles (present in the space radiation) traveling through the eye, and, possibly, some other visual cortical areas. In the 1990s the interest in these phenomena increased again and additional experiments in Low Earth Orbit and others ground-based were started. Recently patients undergoing proton and heavy ion therapy for eye or head and neck tumors have reported the perception of light flashes, opening a new channel to investigate these phenomena. In this paper the many LF studies will be reviewed, presenting an historical and scientific perspective consistent with the combined set of observations, offering a single comprehensive summary aimed to provide further insights on these phenomena. While the light flashes appear not to be a risk by themselves, they might provide information on the amount of radiation induced radicals in the astronauts' eyes. Understanding their generation mechanisms might also support radiation countermeasures development. However, even given the substantial progress outlined in this paper, many questions related to their generation are still under debate, so additional studies are suggested. Finally, it is also conceivable that further LF investigations could provide evidence about the possible interaction of single particles in space with brain function, impacting with the crew ability to optimally perform a mission.

Synchronization of light flash with the irradiation pulse in proton beam therapy: A case report

The correlation between sensory light flash and proton beam delivery was evaluated by measuring the timing of pulse beam delivery and light flash sensing using an event recorder in an 83-year-old patient receiving proton beam therapy (PBT) for nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. The treatment dose was 65 Gy (RBE) in 26 fractions with 2 ports, and both beams included the visual pathway (retina, optic nerve, chiasma). Measurements were obtained in 13 of the 26 fractions. The patient sensed a light flash in all 13 fractions and pressed the recorder button for 426 of the 430 pulsed beam deliveries, giving a sensing rate of 99.1%. The median duration of button-pressing of 0.3 s was almost the same as that of the beam pulse of 0.2 s, with a reaction time lag of 0.35 s. These results suggest a consistency between light flash during PBT and the timing of irradiation.

X-ray perception: Animal studies of sensory and behavioral responses to X-rays

Since their discovery in 1895, many studies have been conducted to understand the effect of X-rays on neural function and behavior in animals. These studies examined a range of acute and chronic effects, and a subset of studies has attempted to determine if X-rays can produce any sensory responses. Here we review literature on animal behavioral responses to X-rays from 1895 until 2021 to assess the evidence for detection of X-rays by sensory receptors in animals. We focus on the changes in appetitive and consummatory behavior, radiotaxis, behavioral arousal, and olfactory responses to X-rays that have been reported in the literature. Taken together, the reviewed literature provides a large body of evidence that X-rays can induce sensory responses in a wide variety of animals and also suggests that these responses are mediated by known sensory receptors. Furthermore, we postulate the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the most biologically active byproduct of X-rays, as a key mediator of sensory receptor responses to X-rays.

Long term food stability for extended space missions: a review

At present, human spaceflight is confined to low Earth orbit but, in future, will again go to the Moon and, beyond, to Mars. The provision of food during these extended missions will need to meet the special nutritional and psychosocial needs of the crew. Terrestrially grown and processed food products, currently provided for consumption by astronauts/cosmonauts, have not yet been systematically optimised to maintain their nutritional integrity and reach the shelf-life necessary for extended space voyages. Notably, space food provisions for Mars exploration will be subject to extended exposure to galactic cosmic radiation and solar particle events, the impact of which is not fully understood. In this review, we provide a summary of the existing knowledge about current space food products, the impact of radiation and storage on food composition, the identification of radiolytic biomarkers and identify gaps in our knowledge that are specific in relation to the effect of the cosmic radiation on food in space.

Unusual visual and olfactory perceptions during radiotherapy sessions: an investigation of the organs responsible

During radiotherapy sessions to treat brain tumors or head-and-neck cancers, some patients experience unusual visual and/or olfactory perceptions. This prospective study sought to answer two questions: (i) what proportion of patients experience these unpleasant sensations?, and (ii) which organs are responsible? Eligible patients had brain or near-orbital tumors treated by helical tomotherapy. All were aged 10 years or older, able to communicate, and interviewed by a radiation oncologist at least once weekly during radiation therapy. If they had experienced such sensations, they were encouraged to join the second phase of the study. The patients were asked to indicate, using a button, when a sensation commenced and ended. The recorded data were collated with the treatment log. Thirty-eight consecutive patients were eligible. Twenty-six experienced visual and 13 olfactory sensations. The radiation doses to the organs related to the visual or olfactory sensations did not differ between patients who reported sensations and those who did not. Seventeen patients were enrolled in the second phase of the study. All 14 with visual sensations reported that the sensations occurred when the X-rays passed at eye level. Olfactory sensations were reported by eight out of nine patients when the X-rays passed through the olfactory epithelium and/or ethmoid sinus level. In conclusion, 68% of patients experienced visual sensations caused by X-rays passing through the level of the eyes, and 34% complained of olfactory sensations. With the exception of one patient, olfactory sensations occurred when the X-rays passed through the levels of the olfactory epithelium and/or ethmoid sinus.

Visual light perceptions caused by medical linear accelerator: Findings of machine-learning algorithms in a prospective questionnaire-based case-control study

This study aimed to investigate the possible incidence of visual light perceptions (VLPs) during radiation therapy (RT). We analyzed whether VLPs could be affected by differences in the radiation energy, prescription doses, age, sex, or RT locations, and whether all VLPs were caused by radiation. From November 2016 to August 2018, a total of 101 patients who underwent head-and-neck or brain RT were screened. After receiving RT, questionnaires were completed, and the subjects were interviewed. Random forests (RF), a tree-based machine learning algorithm, and logistic regression (LR) analyses were compared by the area under the curve (AUC), and the algorithm that achieved the highest AUC was selected. The dataset sample was based on treatment with non-human units, and a total of 293 treatment fields from 78 patients were analyzed. VLPs were detected only in 122 of the 293 exposure portals (40.16%). The dataset was randomly divided into 80% and 20% as the training set and test set, respectively. In the test set, RF achieved an AUC of 0.888, whereas LR achieved an AUC of 0.773. In this study, the retina fraction dose was the most important continuous variable and had a positive effect on VLP. Age was the most important categorical variable. In conclusion, the visual light perception phenomenon by the human body during RT is induced by radiation rather than being a self-suggested hallucination or induced by phosphenes.

Multiple sensory illusions are evoked during the course of proton therapy

Visual illusions from astronauts in space have been reported to be associated with the passage of high energy charged particles through visual structures (retina, optic nerve, brain). Similar effects have also been reported by patients under proton and heavy ion therapies. This prompted us to investigate whether protons at the Loma Linda University Proton Therapy and Research Center (PTRC) may also affect other sensory systems beside evoking similar perceptions on the visual system. A retrospective review of proton radiotherapy patient records at PTRC identified 29 sensory reports from 19 patients who spontaneously reported visual, olfactory, auditory and gustatory illusions during treatment. Our results suggest that protons can evoke neuronal responses sufficient to elicit conscious sensory illusion experiences, in four senses (auditory, taste, smell, and visual) analogous to those from normal sensory inputs. The regions of the brain receiving the highest doses corresponded with the anatomical structures associated with each type of illusion. Our findings suggest that more detailed queries about sensory illusions during proton therapy are warranted, possibly integrated with quantitative effect descriptions (such as electroencephalography) and can provide additional physiological basis for understanding the effects of protons on central nervous system tissues, needed for radiation risk assessment in advance of deep space human exploration.

Mechanisms of phosphenes in irradiated patients

Anomalous visual perceptions have been reported in various diseases of the retina and visual pathways or can be experienced under specific conditions in healthy individuals. Phosphenes are perceptions of light in the absence of ambient light, occurring independently of the physiological and classical photonic stimulation of the retina. They are a frequent symptom in patients irradiated in the region of the central nervous system (CNS), head and neck and the eyes. Phosphenes have historically been attributed to complex physical phenomena such as Cherenkov radiation. While phosphenes are related to Cherenkov radiation under high energy photon/electron irradiation conditions, physical phenomena are unlikely to be responsible for light flashes at energies used for ocular proton therapy. Phosphenes may involve a direct role for ocular photoreceptors and possible interactions between cones and rods. Other mechanisms involving the retinal ganglion cells or ultraweak biophoton emission and rhodopsin bleaching after exposure to free radicals are also likely to be involved. Despite their frequency as shown in our preliminary observations, phosphenes have been underreported probably because their mechanism and impact are poorly understood. Recently, phosphenes have been used to restore the vision and whether they might predict vision loss after therapeutic irradiation is a current field of investigation. We have reviewed and also investigated here the mechanisms related to the occurrence of phosphenes in irradiated patients and especially in patients irradiated by proton therapy for ocular tumors.