Complications of Open Elbow Arthrolysis in Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness: A Systematic Review

Open Arthrolysis for Chronic Elbow Dislocation with Extremely Severe Stiffness in Children

OBJECTIVE

Studies on extremely severe elbow stiffness after chronic dislocation in children are scarce. This study aims to investigate the choice of surgical treatment modalities and to analyze their treatment efficacy in children with chronic elbow dislocation with extremely severe periarticular stiffness.

METHODS

Data of 21 children with chronic elbow dislocation with extremely severe periarticular stiffness diagnosed and treated in our department between February 2015 and February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty boys and one girl were included in the study, their mean age was 11 ± 2.5 years, and they had concomitant distal humerus fractures. For the treatment protocol, all children with extremely severe elbow stiffness were treated with open arthrolysis, and elbow joint stability was intraoperatively assessed. All children performed passive functional exercises the day after surgery. The elbow flexion and extension angles, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo score were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 21 children, only one had recurrent severe stiffness of the elbow joint after surgery; nevertheless, the function was still improved compared with that before surgery. Preoperatively, the mean elbow extension and flexion angles were 72.2° ± 12.7° and 93.6° ± 11.1°, respectively, and the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint was 17.8° ± 8.3°. At the final follow-up, the mean elbow extension and flexion angles were 22.7° ± 18.6° and 118.8° ± 15.4°, respectively, and the elbow joint ROM was 96.1° ± 17.4°. The differences in the preoperative and postoperative ROMs, flexion angles, and extension angles of the elbow joint were significant (p < 0.01). The MEPS at the final follow-up was 78.57 ± 14.24, which was significantly higher than preoperative (29.76 ± 10.89), and the excellent rate was 81%.

CONCLUSION

Open arthrolysis and open reduction and internal fixation of the elbow joint are effective in treating chronic elbow dislocation with extremely severe stiffness in children.

Comparison of results of arthroscopic arthrolysis between traumatic and degenerative elbow stiffness

INTRODUCTION

Elbow stiffness significantly affects the patient's quality of life. This joint must have at least 30°/130° extension/flexion and 50°/50° pronation/supination to function normally according to Morrey.

HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to evaluate functional outcome of arthroscopic arthrolysis by comparing stiffness of post-traumatic and degenerative origin. The hypothesis was that this surgical technique allows functional improvement in any indication but with a faster result in degenerative pathology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study including all patients who underwent elbow arthrolysis under arthroscopy, operated on by a single operator, between 2013 and 2020. Thirty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 45years (range, 18-78years). Patients were divided into two groups according to etiology. Group A (post-traumatic) consisted of 18 patients with a mean age of 33years (range, 18-64years) and group B (degenerative) of 16 patients with a mean age of 59years (range, 42-78years). All patients were clinically assessed at a mean 27months. Range of motion, level of satisfaction and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were collected.

RESULTS

In the overall series, preoperative range of motion was 81° and significantly improved postoperatively to 122° (p<0.001). The preoperative data of the 2 groups were comparable except for age (p<0.001) and MEPS (p=0.044). Postoperatively, range of motion improved significantly in both groups but with greater gain in group A (p=0.003). MEPS improved significantly in both groups, but the postoperative score was poorer in group B (p=0.001). Recovery of range of motion was faster in group B (2.4months) than in group A (3.7months) (p=0.021). There were 5 complications: 4 secondary decompensations of ulnar tunnel syndrome, and 1 postoperative radial nerve paresis. 94% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic arthrolysis is an effective option for post-traumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness. Improvement was significant in terms of both function and range of motion, with, however, better results in the post-traumatic group but results achieved more rapidly in the degenerative pathology group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Arthrofibrosis Nightmares: Prevention and Management Strategies

Arthrofibrosis (AF) is an exaggerated immune response to a proinflammatory insult leading to pathologic periarticular fibrosis and symptomatic joint stiffness. The knee, elbow, and shoulder are particularly susceptible to AF, often in the setting of trauma, surgery, or adhesive capsulitis. Prevention through early physiotherapeutic interventions and anti-inflammatory medications remain fundamental to avoiding motion loss. Reliable nonoperative modalities exist and outcomes are improved when etiology, joint involved, and level of dysfunction are considered in the clinical decision making process. Surgical procedures should be reserved for cases recalcitrant to nonoperative measures. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current understanding of AF pathophysiology, identify common risk factors, describe prevention strategies, and outline both nonoperative and surgical treatment options. This manuscript will focus specifically on sterile AF of the knee, elbow, and shoulder.

Long-term outcomes of open arthrolysis combined with radial head arthroplasty for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: results are durable over 8 years

BACKGROUND

Post-trauma elbow stiffness (PTES) is a common complication after elbow trauma that causes severe upper limb disability. Open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) with radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is an effective method to treat PTES with rotation limitation, or persistent pain/instability after radial head resection. However, no long-term results have been reported for this technique. This study aimed to show the clinical and radiographic outcomes of OEA with RHA over 8 years and compare its efficacy at 3 years (short-term).

METHODS

Patients with PTES treated by OEA with RHA between September 2010 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen patients were followed up over 8 years (range, 100-106 months). A bipolar prosthesis of RHA was performed during OEA. Preoperative, 3-year, and 8-year elbow and forearm motion, upper limb function, radiographic outcomes, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Clinically important improvements in elbow motion and forearm rotation were obtained, from 34° and 58° preoperatively, to 109° and 135° at 3 years, which were maintained over 8 years, to 113° (P = .262) and 134° (P = .489). The Mayo Elbow Performance Index had clinically important increases from the preoperative level of 58 to 94 points at 3 years, and was maintained over 8 years (95 points, P = .422), with 100% reporting excellent to good outcomes. Pain and nerve symptoms were also improved. Complications consisted of new-onset ulnar nerve symptoms in 1 patient, nonclinically significant heterotopic ossification recurrence in 3, humeroulnar arthritis exacerbation in 4, and periprosthetic lucency in 8.

CONCLUSIONS

OEA with RHA yielded satisfactory short-term outcomes for PTES at 3 years, with substantial improvements in elbow mobility and function, and the results were durable over the long term (8 years).

Comparative study of the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis with or without external fixation for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation.

CONCLUSION

Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Intravenous tranexamic acid reduce postoperative drainage and pain after open elbow arthrolysis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Open elbow arthrolysis (OEA), which has become an established treatment for post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES), requires complete release of contracture tissue and wide excision of ectopic bone, which results in extensive bleeding. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) on postoperative drainage, calculated blood loss, and early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing OEA.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial including 96 patients undergoing OEA was undertaken. Patients received intravenously either 100 mL saline (placebo group, n = 48), or 100 mL saline plus 1 g TXA (TXA group, n = 48) before skin incision. The primary outcome was the drainage volume on postoperative days (PODs) 1-3. Secondary outcomes included the calculated blood loss, elbow pain score measured by visual analog scale (VAS), elbow function valued by Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and rate of complications after OEA.

RESULTS

Mean total postoperative drainage volume (TXA group: 182 mL vs. placebo group: 214 mL, P = .003) and mean calculated total blood loss (TXA group: 582 mL vs. placebo group: 657 mL, P = .004) were significantly lower in the TXA group. No transfusions were necessary in either group. Mean VAS pain scores in elbow motion showed marked differences between both groups on POD 1 (TXA: 5 vs. placebo: 6, P = .003) and POD 2 (TXA: 4 vs. placebo: 5, P = .023) but not in other postoperative time points. No differences were detected in complications, such as pin-related infection, hematoma, new or exacerbation of ulnar nerve symptoms, and recurrent heterotopic ossification. At the 6-month follow-up, no statistical differences were found between the 2 groups with respect to the elbow functions including range of motion, VAS score, and MEPS.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous administration of TXA significantly decreased the postoperative drainage volume and the total estimated blood loss and alleviated the elbow pain with motion during early postoperative days in patients undergoing OEA.

Surgical Treatment of Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness by Wide Posterior Approach

Objective  To demonstrate the clinical outcomes and complication rates of the surgical release with a single posterior approach in the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

Methods  A prospective study with patients submitted to surgery between May 2013 and June 2018 in a single center. The access to the elbow was made through the posterior approach. The patients were followed up by an occupational therapy team, and were submitted to a standardized rehabilitation protocol, with static progressive orthoses and dynamic orthoses. The primary outcome was the range of flexion-extension of the elbow after 6 months.

Results  A total of 26 patients completed the minimum follow-up of 6-months. The mean range of flexion-extension of the elbow at the end of 6 months was of 98.3 ± 22.0°, with an amplitude gain of 40.0 ± 14.0° in relation to the pre-operative period ( p  < 0.001). The average flexion-extension gain at the end of 6 months was of 51.7% ± 17.1% ( p  < 0.001). The mean pronosupination at the end of 6 months was of 129.0 ± 42.7° ( p  < 0.001). Half of the cases had moderate and severe stiffness in the pre-operative period, compared with 7.7% at 6 months post-operatively ( p  < 0.001). The mean score for the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) instruments was 74.4 ± 16.8 points and 31.7 ± 21.9 points respectively ( p  < 0.001 for both). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score presented no statistically significant difference compared to the pre-operative period ( p  = 0.096). Complications were observed in 6 (23%) patients, and no new surgical procedures were necessary.

Conclusions  The surgical release of the elbow associated with a rehabilitation protocol is a safe technique, with satisfactory results and low rate of complications.

Primary open elbow arthrolysis in post-traumatic elbow stiffness - A comparison of outcomes in severity of elbow injury

PURPOSE

Stiffness is a sequelae of elbow trauma. Arthrolysis may be considered to increase range of movement (ROM). Little is published on the outcomes/complications of elbow arthrolysis. We present our series of primary open arthrolysis in posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients that underwent primary open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness in our unit (2011-2018) were analysed. All procedures were performed by an elbow surgeon. Postoperative rehabilitation followed protocol with early motion; continuous passive motion (CPM) was utilised if requested. Data collected included patient demographics, traumatic injury type, arthrolysis technique, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative elbow ROM, complications and postoperative Oxford Elbow Score (OES).

RESULTS

41 patients were included. 59% were male. Mean age at time of arthrolysis was 43 years (range 12-79 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 53 months (range 8-100 months). Median duration from time of injury to arthrolysis was 11 months (range 2-553 months). Mean preoperative flexion-extension arc (FEA) was 70°, improving to 104° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean preoperative pronosupination arc (PSA) was 125°, improving to 165° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean postoperative OES was 37 (n = 28). Complication rate was 24% with 7 recurrence requiring surgery, 2 nerve injuries and 1 infection. CPM, 10 patients, saw mean FEA improvement of 56°. Mean PSA improvement was 36°. Complication rate for these patients was 40%. Severe traumatic injury was associated with increased preoperative stiffness (FEA 61° vs 84°, PSA 111° vs 149°) but larger improvements in ROM (postoperative FEA 98° [p < 0.001], PSA 165° [p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

This series demonstrates improvement in elbow ROM following open arthrolysis with significantly higher gain in pronosupination for those withsevere injury. Moderate results were seen in a patient reported outcome measure. Patients considering arthrolysis should be counselled regarding expectations/complication rate.

Randomized trial for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: surgical release vs. rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

There are no previous randomized trials comparing surgical to conservative treatment for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The aim of our study was to compare elbow range of motion (ROM) and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing surgical treatment or a standardized rehabilitation for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trial of patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness for more than 6 months who failed conventional physical therapy for 4 months. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups. The conservative group underwent the rehabilitation protocol associated with the use of orthoses (static progressive for extension and dynamic for flexion) and continuous passive motion. The surgical group underwent surgical release by a posterior approach without triceps detachment, followed by a rehabilitation protocol similar to the conservative group. The primary outcome of the study was flexion-extension ROM at 6 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the visual analog scale for pain, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, absolute and relative increase in flexion-extension ROM, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were analyzed in the study, 15 in each group. The mean elbow flexion-extension ROM at the end of 6 months of follow-up was 108° in the surgical group and 88° in the conservative group (P = .002). The mean absolute and the relative increase of elbow flexion-extension at 6 months were, respectively, 17° and 27% in the conservative group and 41° and 59% in the surgical group (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical elbow release associated with the rehabilitation protocol resulted in a greater flexion-extension ROM, as well as a greater absolute and relative increase compared with rehabilitation alone at 6 months of follow-up. The groups did not differ regarding clinical scores and complication rates.

Effect of hyperuricemia on functional outcomes and complications in patients with elbow stiffness after open arthrolysis combined with hinged external fixation: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hyperuricemia is considered a risk factor for increased postoperative complications and adverse functional outcomes in a variety of orthopedic surgeries. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of patients with different uric acid levels after elbow arthrolysis.

METHODS

The study included 131 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent arthrolysis between March 2014 and March 2016. All patients were divided into 4 groups based on the preoperative serum level of uric acid (UA). The quartile method was used for grouping patients, including 33 in Q1 (UA <293 μmol/L), 34 in Q2 (293-348 μmol/L), 32 in Q3 (348-441 μmol/L), and 32 in Q4 (441-710 μmol/L). At baseline and each time point of follow-up, functional performance, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, visual analog scale for pain, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Preoperative data were not significantly different among the 4 groups (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4). At the final follow-up, the following data showed significant differences among the 4 groups: extension (P = .031), flexion (P = .008), range of motion (P = .003), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (P = .011), and visual analog scale (P = .032). Interestingly, patients in the Q4 group had the poorest clinical outcomes. However, no significant differences were found among the 4 groups in new onset or exacerbation of nerve symptoms (P = .919), reduced muscle strength (P = .536), instability (P = .567), or infection (P = .374) at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness, abnormal serum uric acid metabolism was a risk factor for poor performance and postoperative pain after arthrolysis. Therefore, detecting the preoperative serum uric acid levels of the patients would be helpful for evaluating the postoperative outcomes.

Intra-articular injection of mitomycin C prevents progression of immobilization-induced arthrogenic contracture in the remobilized rat knee

This study tested whether cell cycle inhibitor mitomycin C (MMC) prevents arthrogenic contracture progression during remobilization by inhibiting fibroblast proliferation and fibrosis in the joint capsule. Rat knees were immobilized in a flexed position to generate flexion contracture. After three weeks, the fixation device was removed and rat knees were allowed to freely move for one week. Immediately after and three days after fixator removal, rats received intra-articular injections of MMC or saline. The passive extension range of motion (ROM) was measured before and after myotomy of the knee flexors to distinguish myogenic and arthrogenic contractures. In addition, both cellularity and fibrosis in the posterior joint capsule were assessed histologically. Joint immobilization significantly decreased ROMs both before and after myotomy compared with untreated controls. In saline-injected knees, remobilization increased ROM before myotomy, but further decreased that after myotomy compared with that of knees immediately after three weeks of immobilization. Histological analysis revealed that hypercellularity, mainly due to fibroblast proliferation, and fibrosis characterized by increases in collagen density and joint capsule thickness occurred after remobilization in saline-injected knees. Conversely, MMC injections were able to prevent the remobilization-enhanced reduction of ROM after myotomy by inhibiting both hypercellularity and joint capsule fibrosis. Our results suggest that joint capsule fibrosis accompanied by fibroblast proliferation is a potential cause of arthrogenic contracture progression during remobilization, and that inhibiting fibroblast proliferation may constitute an effective remedy.

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness: Pathogenesis and current treatments

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a major cause of functional impairment after elbow trauma. A stiff elbow limits patients' ability to position their hand in space for optimal use of their upper extremities, and as such, is a frequent indication for reoperation. This article reviews current concepts on the pathogenesis of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Current nonoperative treatment options include therapy, bracing, and manipulation under anesthesia, while operative treatment options include arthroscopic and open arthrolysis. The pros and cons of various treatment options are discussed, with a focus on the evidence supporting their use, the expected functional gains, and associated complications. Future directions in post-traumatic elbow stiffness are highlighted.

What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness?

BACKGROUND

The elbow is more susceptible to loss of motion after trauma than any other joint. Open arthrolysis often is performed for posttraumatic elbow stiffness if the stiffness does not improve with nonsurgical treatment, but the midterm results of this procedure and factors that may limit recovery have not been widely studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We reviewed patients who had undergone open arthrolysis with hinged external fixator for severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness (ROM ≤ 60°) with a minimum of 5 years followup to (1) analyze ROM gains; (2) assess functional improvement with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and DASH, quality of life with the SF-36, pain with VAS, and ulnar nerve function with the Amadio rating scale and Dellon classification; and (3) identify complications and risk factors that might hinder mid-term elbow motion recovery after this procedure.

METHODS

Between March 2011 and December 2012, we generally offered patients with elbow stiffness an open arthrolysis procedure when function did not improve with 6 months of nonoperative therapy, and no contraindications such as immature heterotopic ossification or complete destruction of articular cartilage were present. During that time, 161 patients underwent open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness at our institution; 49 of them satisfied the study inclusion criteria (adults with elbow ROM ≤ 60° as a result of trauma) and exclusion criteria (stiffness caused by burns or central nervous system injuries, causative trauma associated with nonunion or malunion of the elbow, severe articular damage that would have necessitated joint arthroplasty, or prior elbow release). In general, a combined medial-lateral approach to the elbow was performed to address the soft tissue tethers and any blocks to elbow motion, and a hinged external fixator was applied for 6 weeks to maintain elbow stability and improve the efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation. These patients were evaluated retrospectively at a mean followup period of 69 months (range, 62-83 months), and demographics, disease characteristics, arthrolysis details, pre- and postoutcome measures as noted, and complications were recorded via an electronic database. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM recovery.

RESULTS

At final followup, total ROM increased from a preoperative mean of 27 ± 20° to a postoperative mean of 131 ± 11° (mean difference, 104°; 95% CI, 98°-111°; p < 0.001), and 98% (48 of 49) of patients achieved a functional ROM of 30° to 130°. Improvements were also found in functional scores (MEPI: 54 ± 12 to 95 ± 7, mean difference, 41 points; DASH: 48 ± 17 to 8 ± 8, mean difference, 40 points; both p < 0.001), life quality (physical SF-36: 46 ± 11 to 81 ± 12, mean difference, 35 points; mental SF-36: 43 ± 14 to 80 ± 9, mean difference, 37 points; both p < .001), pain (VAS: 2.5 ± 2.4 to 0.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 2.0 points; p < 0.001), and ulnar nerve function (Amadio score: 7.8 ± 1.9 to 8.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 0.6 points; p = 0.004). A total of 18% (nine of 49 patients) developed complications, including new-onset or exacerbated nerve symptoms (four patients), recurrent heterotopic ossification (two patients), and pin-related infections (three patients). No patients underwent subsequent surgery for any of the above complications. Lastly, the medium-term ROM was divided into ROM ≤ 120° (n = 9) and ROM > 120° (n = 40). After controlling for potential confounding variables such as duration of stiffness and tobacco use, we found that tobacco use was the only independent risk factor examined (odds ratio, 9; 95% CI, 2-47; p = 0.009) associated with recovery of ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory medium-term results were found for open arthrolysis with hinged external fixation with our protocol in patients who had severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness. Appropriate and sufficient releases of tethered soft tissues and correction of any blocks that affect elbow motion intraoperatively, a dedicated team approach, and an aggressive and systematic postoperative rehabilitation program are the core steps for this procedure. Additionally, the importance of preoperative discontinuation of tobacco use should be emphasized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Tobacco use predicts poorer clinical outcomes and higher post-operative complication rates after open elbow arthrolysis

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco use is a worldwide public health problem, and has been found to be a predisposing factor for adverse functional outcomes and increased postoperative complication rates after various orthopedic operations. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential impact of tobacco use on open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A database search identified 145 patients with open arthrolysis performed for post-traumatic elbow stiffness; these were divided into three groups: current tobacco users (37), former users (28), and nonusers (80). All surgeries were performed using the same technique by the same doctor. General patient data, functional performance, and complications were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of range of motion (P < 0.001), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (P = 0.006), visual analog scale score for pain (P = 0.015), Dellon classification for ulnar nerve symptoms (P = 0.013), and total complication rates (P < 0.001). The current tobacco users group had the poorest clinical outcomes and highest complication rates, while no significant differences were found between former users and nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Current tobacco users reported increased risk of poorer clinical outcomes and higher postoperative complication rates after open arthrolysis. Former users were found to have outcomes similar to those of nonusers. This study underlines the importance of discontinuing tobacco use for patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who are considering open arthrolysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Retrospective Cohort Design; Therapeutic Study.

Determining the effective timing of an open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Following trauma, the elbow is the most susceptible to restricted motion among all joints. Open arthrolysis is often performed for post-traumatic elbow stiffness if that stiffness does not improve with non-operative management. However, the optimal timing for performing an open arthrolysis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome (elbow motion and function) and the rate of complications among patients who had undergone early, median and late release procedures to establish an optimal time interval following the injury, after which, an effective open arthrolysis can be performed.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we included total 133 patients, who had undergone open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The subjects were divided into 3 groups, with 31 patients in the early release group (arthrolysis performed at 6–10 months after injury), 78 patients in the median release group (at 11–20 months), and 24 patients in the late release group (at > 20 months). The release procedure in all patients was performed by the same surgeon, using the same technique. The general data, functional performance, and complications, if any, were retrospectively documented for all patients and statistically analysed.

Results

The demographic data and disease characteristics of all patients were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found among the three groups with respect to the range of motion (p = 0.067), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p = 0.350) and its ratings (p = 0.329), visual analog scale score for pain (p = 0.227), Dellon classification for ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.497), and each discrete complication (all p values > 0.05).

Conclusions

At the final follow-up, our results showed no significant difference in the postoperative elbow motion capacities, functional scores and the rates of complications among patients who had undergone an early, median, and late release. Therefore, we have recommended that an early arthrolysis would be preferable due to its multiple advantages, and the conventionally observed interval of > 1 year after the injury, could be shortened.

Level of evidence

Level III; Retrospective Cohort Design; Therapeutic Study.

Development and validation of a new elbow-specific scoring system for patients with elbow stiffness: the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score

BACKGROUND

Clinical scoring systems are increasingly important and popular for the evaluation of orthopedic patients. Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new elbow-specific assessment score to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The new system, the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score (SHEDS), was developed in 3 portions: elbow motion capacities, elbow-related symptoms, and patient satisfaction level. A total of 73 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach α values were calculated for test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the SHEDS with previously validated scoring systems. Effect sizes (ES) and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for responsiveness.

RESULTS

Positive reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 and adequate homogeneity with a Cronbach α value of 0.74 were found for the SHEDS. Good to excellent validity using Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) were determined for the total (0.51-0.82), motion (0.65-0.89), and symptom (0.35-0.53) scores. Responsiveness was large for the total ES, 3.48; SRM, 2.96), motion (ES, 2.54; SRM, 2.08), and symptom (ES, 1.26; SRM, 1.14) scores. There were no ceiling or floor effects. Significant positive correlations were found between patient satisfaction levels and the final scores (SCC, 0.62), as well as the score changes of the SHEDS (SCC, 0.42).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the newly developed SHEDS is an excellent, comprehensive, valid scoring system to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness.

[Performance control after arthroscopic arthrolysis with capsulectomy in fresh-frozen elbow joints]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Posttraumatic or postoperative movement restrictions in elbow joints can often occur (including capsular contracture) and can generate everyday limitations. In persistent elbow stiffness, arthroscopic arthrolysis with removal of the dorsal and ventral capsule portions can be carried out. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic capsulectomy by means of an in vitro anatomical study.

METHODS

A standardized elbow arthroscopy with ventral and dorsal capsulectomy was performed and image-documented in five fresh-frozen elbow specimens. Subsequently, open dissection of the elbow joint was performed to analyze the amount of residual capsule by means of photodocumentation of the specimens.

RESULTS

Regardless of the surgeon and surgical experience, anterior and posterior remnants of the capsule remained in all specimens. Dorsal capsule strands around the standard arthroscopy portals were noticed particularly more often in the area of the high dorsolateral camera portal. An incomplete capsulectomy was seen on the ulnar side at the level of the posterior medial ligament (PML) in the immediate vicinity of the ulnar nerve. Ventrally, a capsulectomy was performed from the radial side and also the ulnar side until the brachialis muscle and additionally a complete capsulectomy as far as the anterior medial ligament (AML) and radial collateral ligament (RCL) was achieved. The capsule was completely resected in a proximal direction. Distally, irrelevant capsular remnants were found in the region of the annular ligament and distal of the tip of the coronoid process.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic arthrolysis can be performed with a high degree of radicality. The radicality must be self-critically taken into account in one's own action. The radicality of the portal change may even be higher ventrally than with an isolated column procedure. On the other hand, it must be critically considered that posteriorly, the PML cannot be adequately addressed by means of arthroscopy due to the risk of ulnar nerve injury. Portal changes might help to enable a more complete visualization of the joint capsule and may avoid leaving possibly relevant remnants of the capsule. If a release of the PML is required, this may have to be carried out in combination with an ulnar nerve release in a mini-open technique.

Validation of the Liverpool Elbow Score for evaluation of elbow stiffness

Background

The Liverpool Elbow Score (LES) has been widely used to assess the outcomes of total elbow replacement in various conditions. However, there have been no published validation studies on LES for patients with stiff elbows undergoing arthrolysis. The purpose of this study was to find out whether LES could be equally applied to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness.

Methods

A total of 63 patients with elbow stiffness were included in this retrospective validation study. The LES combines a nine-item patient-answered questionnaire (PAQ) and a six-item clinical assessment score (CAS), and can also be divided to evaluate two different parameters: elbow motion capacity (EMC) and elbow-related symptoms (ERS). Construct validity was assessed by correlating LES with previously validated scoring systems, and Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) were calculated. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated to determine responsiveness.

Results

There were no ceiling or floor effects in the target population. Good-to-excellent validity was determined based on total score (0.45–0.89), PAQ (0.42–0.88), CAS (0.35–0.60), EMC (0.46–0.86), and ERS (0.36–0.59). High responsiveness (ES/SRM) was observed in total score (2.80/2.24), PAQ (2.34/1.78), CAS (2.90/2.34), EMC (2.92/2.35), and ERS (0.55/0.52).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the LES is a valid elbow-specific scoring system that can be used to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness, though some items included had some weakness either.

Impact of different glucose metabolism status on clinical outcomes of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Diabetes and prediabetes are worldwide public health problems and are considered predisposing factors for adverse functional outcomes after various orthopedic operations. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the impact of glucose metabolism status on functional outcomes and complications after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The study included 152 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness undergoing arthrolysis, including 120 in the normoglycemic group, 21 in the impaired glucose regulation group, and 11 in the diabetes mellitus group. General patient data, functional performance, and complications were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, significant differences were found in range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score: the diabetes mellitus group had the poorest clinical outcomes. However, there were no significant differences in forearm rotation, visual analog scale pain scores, and complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness and abnormal glucose metabolism were at increased risk of poorer outcomes after open arthrolysis, and patients with diabetes mellitus had the poorest performance. This study underlines the importance of glycemic control in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism before open arthrolysis.

Post-traumatic stiff elbow

Post-traumatic and post-operative stiffness of the elbow joint is relatively common and may in pronounced cases markedly interfere with normal upper extremity function.Soft-tissue contractures and heterotopic bone formation are two major causes of limited movement.Extensive recent research has elucidated many of the pathways contributing to these conditions, but the exact mechanisms are still unknown.In the early phase of soft-tissue contractures conservative treatment may be valuable, but in longstanding cases operative treatment is often necessary.Several different options are available depending on the severity of the condition and the underlying offending structures. Surgical treatment may allow significant gains in movement but rarely complete restoration, and complications are not uncommon.The following presentation reviews the recent literature on pathomechanisms and treatment alternatives. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170062.

Effect of disease duration on functional outcomes and complications after arthrolysis in patients with elbow stiffness

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a long duration of elbow stiffness on functional outcomes and complications after arthrolysis.

METHODS

Participants included consecutive patients with a long duration of elbow stiffness (≥5 years, n = 23) and control patients matched for age, sex, and initial injury type (n = 46). All patients underwent elbow arthrolysis combined with hinged external fixation between March 2014 and March 2016. At baseline and follow-up, we evaluated elbow motion (flexion, extension, supination, pronation, and range of motion) and patient-reported outcomes, including the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and visual analog scale for pain. Postoperative complications including infection, nerve dysfunction, and instability were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative elbow pain, range of motion, or MEPS between groups. Postoperatively, pronation and the MEPS in patients with a long disease duration were inferior to those in control patients (P = .041 and P = .016, respectively). Patients with a long disease duration also had a significantly higher incidence of complications than control patients (P = .002). At final follow-up, 7 patients (30%) in the long disease duration group and 3 patients (7%) in the control group presented with nerve symptoms (P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

A long duration of elbow stiffness may negatively influence functional outcomes and increase the risk of complications after arthrolysis.

[Treatment of elbow joint stiffness by open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation]

Objective

To observe the effectiveness of open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation for the treatment of elbow stiffness.

Methods

A total of 77 patients with elbow stiffness caused by trauma were enrolled in this study between October 2014 and October 2015. The patients were divided into control group (39 cases) and observation group (38 cases) by random number table method. The patients in the observation group were treated with elbow joint opening and release combined with distal radial fixation hinged external fixation, while the control group was treated with traditional release. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease causes, original damage diagnosis, the time from injury to operation, preoperative flexion and extension activity of elbow joint, and preoperative Mayo elbow joint function score between 2 groups ( P>0.05). After operation, the function of elbow joint was evaluated by the flexion and extension activity of the elbow joint and the Mayo elbow joint function evaluation standard.

Results

The incisions healed by first intention in 2 groups. In observation group, there were 1 case infection of nail tract, 2 cases ulnar nerve symptoms, 1 case elbow ossification, and 1 case moderate pain in the elbow; while in control group, there were 2 cases of infection of nail tract, 2 cases of ulnar nerve symptoms, and 3 cases moderate pain in the elbow. The patients in 2 groups were followed up 6 weeks to 12 months, with an average of 6 months. The flexion and extension activity of elbow joint and Mayo elbow joint function score at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); at last follow-up, the flexion and extension activity of elbow joint and Mayo elbow joint function score in observation group patients were significantly better than those in control group ( P<0.05). According to the Mayo elbow function evaluation standard, the results were excellent in 27 cases, good in 10 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 97.4% in observation group; and the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 21 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.6% in control group; showing no significant difference between 2 groups ( P=0.108).

Conclusion

Open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation can significantly improve the elbow function of patients with traumatic elbow stiffness, its recovery of elbow function was superior to the traditional release.

Effect on muscle strength of the upper extremities after open elbow arthrolysis

Background

Open elbow arthrolysis manipulates tendons and soft tissues surrounding the elbow and may lead to strength decline after the operation. We hypothesized that strength of elbow and wrist motions and handgrip could be compromised after the procedure and that the strength recovery pattern may differ between men and women and between the dominant and nondominant side.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. We monitored 32 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent open arthrolysis between June 2014 and December 2014. All patients underwent standardized postoperative physical therapy. Preoperative and postoperative isometric strength were measured by a handheld dynamometer. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and arc of motion (AOM) were also analyzed.

Results

Mean follow-up was 26.13 months. Significant improvement was noticed in mean AOM (from 46° to 127°) and MEPS (from 67.97 to 96.86). No significant decline was noted in isometric strength at the last follow-up day. The strength ratios between men and women showed no significant difference from postoperative day 7 to the last follow-up day. At all follow-up assessments, isometric strength showed no significant difference between the dominant and nondominant side.

Conclusions

AOM and MEPS achieved significant enhancement after open elbow arthrolysis. The procedure did not lead to isometric strength decline. Postoperative gain of strength was proportional to the baseline strength level of each muscle group, and men had a more prominent gain of strength than women during the entire follow-up. Dominance had no effect on postoperative strength recovery.

The influence of body mass index on outcome of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Being overweight has become a serious public health concern in China. Higher body mass index has been proven to be associated with poor outcome after orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of being overweight on functional outcomes and complications after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including 122 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness undergoing arthrolysis, including 84 in the normal weight group and 38 in the overweight group. Demographic data, surgical data, and data on preoperative and postoperative functional performance and complications were obtained.

RESULTS

Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups at baseline. All patients showed significant improvement after elbow arthrolysis. Postoperatively, the range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the normal weight group were significantly better than those of the overweight group. Sixteen patients developed postoperative complications. No significant differences in complication rates between the 2 groups were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients showed satisfactory functional outcomes after arthrolysis. The postoperative functional outcomes of the overweight group were inferior to those of the normal weight group to a certain extent. This study underlines the importance of detailed rehabilitation instructions in patients with higher body mass index.

Application of distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator in complete open release for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Radical release for severe stiff elbows may lead to instability. Hinged external fixation is used to treat unstable elbows. We hypothesized that extensive open release combined with a distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator would have good performance and low complications rate in treating severe elbow stiffness. Thus, the efficacy and security of this technique were assessed in this study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 38 post-traumatic elbows with severe stiffness that underwent arthrolysis between February 2011 and February 2014. All patients were assessed as having elbow instability after complete arthrolysis. Ligament repair was combined with implantation of a hinged external fixator (fixed to the humerus and distal radius) to maintain elbow stability. Flexion arc, forearm rotation, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, elbow stability, and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 31 months. Significant improvement was noted in flexion-extension arc (from 27° to 126°), forearm rotation (from 148° to 153°), and mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (from 68 points to 96 points). Mean pronation arc decreased from 66° preoperatively to 6° at 1.5 months of follow-up and showed a transient reduction during first 6 months postoperatively. Pin-related infection occurred in 2 patients, which was cured with conservative treatment. Two patients had moderate instability after removal of the fixator and regained stability at the 12-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, complications included ulnar nerve paralysis in 3, recurrence of heterotopic ossification in 1, and moderate pain in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete open release combined with a distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator is an effective treatment for severe stiff elbows. This technique had a low complication rate.

Ulnar neuritis after open elbow arthrolysis combined with ulnar nerve subcutaneous transposition for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: outcome and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Ulnar neuritis (UN) is a common complication of open elbow arthrolysis for elbow stiffness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve during open elbow arthrolysis and to describe the risk factors for UN.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 260 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent routine ulnar nerve transposition during open elbow arthrolysis. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and incidence and reoperation rate of UN were recorded. UN was defined as new-onset ulnar nerve symptoms and no relief or worsening of pre-existing ulnar nerve symptoms during the period of postoperative rehabilitation. Factors affecting the development of UN were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 9.2% of the patients had UN, 25% of whom required reoperation for progressive neuropathy. The Dellon grade of patients associated with UN at last follow-up improved significantly compared with that preoperatively. The mean arc of motion in patients with UN decreased during follow-up in a time-dependent manner. Univariate analysis showed that male sex, limited preoperative flexion and arc of motion, preoperative heterotopic ossification (HO), and preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were significantly associated with the development of UN. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that preoperative HO was the only independent risk factor for the development of UN.

CONCLUSIONS

UN is still an important complication, although ulnar nerve subcutaneous transposition was performed during open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Identified risk factors for UN, especially preoperative HO, should be taken into consideration before surgery.