1
|
Soni KD, Bansal V, Khajanchi M, Veetil DK, Anderson G, Rayker N, Sarang B, David S, Wärnberg MG, Roy N. Intubation and In-Hospital Mortality After Trauma With Glasgow Coma Scale Score Eight or Less-A Cohort Study. J Surg Res 2024; 299:188-194. [PMID: 38761677 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most trauma societies recommend intubating trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores ≤8 without robust supporting evidence. We examined the association between intubation and 30-d in-hospital mortality in trauma patients arriving with a GCS score ≤8 in an Indian trauma registry. METHODS Outcomes of patients with a GCS score ≤8 who were intubated within 1 h of arrival (intubation group) were compared with those who were intubated later or not at all (nonintubation group) using various analytical approaches. The association was assessed in various subgroup and sensitivity analyses to identify any variability of the effect. RESULTS Of 3476 patients who arrived with a GCS score ≤8, 1671 (48.1%) were intubated within 1 h. Overall, 1957 (56.3%) patients died, 947 (56.7%) in the intubation group and 1010 (56.0%) in the nonintubation group, with no significant difference in mortality (odds ratio = 1.2 [confidence interval, 0.8-1.8], P value = 0.467) in multivariable regression and propensity score-matched analysis. This result persisted across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Patients intubated within an hour of arrival had longer durations of ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Intubation within an hour of arrival with a GCS score ≤8 after major trauma was not associated with differences in-hospital mortality. The indications and benefits of early intubation in these severely injured patients should be revisited to promote optimal resource utilization in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kapil Dev Soni
- Critical and Intensive Care, JPN Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Varun Bansal
- Department of General Surgery, Seth. G. S. Medical College & K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Monty Khajanchi
- Department of General Surgery, Seth. G. S. Medical College & K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Geoffrey Anderson
- Division of Trauma, Burn, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency General Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nakul Rayker
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bhakti Sarang
- Trauma Research Group, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India
| | - Siddharth David
- Doctors For You, Mumbai, India; Health Systems and Policy, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Gerdin Wärnberg
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Function Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Nobhojit Roy
- Trauma Research Group, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India; Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Noninvasive Airway Management of Comatose Patients With Acute Poisoning. JAMA 2024; 331:1502-1503. [PMID: 38573647 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.1417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Schober
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stephan Alexander Loer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lothar Andreas Schwarte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mansvelder FJ, Bossers SM, Loer SA, Bloemers FW, Van Lieshout EMM, Den Hartog D, Hoogerwerf N, van der Naalt J, Absalom AR, Peerdeman SM, Bulte CSE, Schwarte LA, Schober P. Etomidate versus Ketamine as Prehospital Induction Agent in Patients with Suspected Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:742-751. [PMID: 38190220 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among young people around the world. Prehospital care focuses on the prevention and treatment of secondary brain injury and commonly includes tracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia. The choice of induction agent in this setting is controversial. This study therefore investigated the association between the chosen induction medication etomidate versus S(+)-ketamine and the 30-day mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital airway management in the Netherlands. METHODS This study is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected observational data of the Brain Injury: Prehospital Registry of Outcomes, Treatments and Epidemiology of Cerebral Trauma (BRAIN-PROTECT) cohort study. Patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury who were transported to a participating trauma center and who received etomidate or S(+)-ketamine for prehospital induction of anesthesia for advanced airway management were included. Statistical analyses were performed with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. RESULTS In total, 1,457 patients were eligible for analysis. No significant association between the administered induction medication and 30-day mortality was observed in unadjusted analyses (32.9% mortality for etomidate versus 33.8% mortality for S(+)-ketamine; P = 0.716; odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32; P = 0.711), as well as after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.73; P = 0.765; and risk difference 0.017; 95% CI, -0.051 to 0.084; P = 0.686). Likewise, in planned subgroup analyses for patients with confirmed traumatic brain injury and patients with isolated traumatic brain injury, no significant differences were found. Consistent results were found after multiple imputations of missing data. CONCLUSIONS The analysis found no evidence for an association between the use of etomidate or S(+)-ketamine as an anesthetic agent for intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury and mortality after 30 days in the prehospital setting, suggesting that the choice of induction agent may not influence the patient mortality rate in this population. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor J Mansvelder
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan M Bossers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephan A Loer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank W Bloemers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Den Hartog
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nico Hoogerwerf
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 3, Volkel, The Netherlands
| | - Joukje van der Naalt
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anthony R Absalom
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Peerdeman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carolien S E Bulte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Schober
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia-Fuertes X, López T, Abad-Gurumeta A, Casans-Francés R, Gómez-Ríos D, Garzón JC, Martínez-Pons V, Casalderrey-Rivas M, Fernández-Vaquero MÁ, Martínez-Hurtado E, Martín-Larrauri R, Reviriego-Agudo L, Gutierrez-Couto U, García-Fernández J, Serrano-Moraza A, Rodríguez Martín LJ, Camacho Leis C, Espinosa Ramírez S, Fandiño Orgeira JM, Vázquez Lima MJ, Mayo-Yáñez M, Parente-Arias P, Sistiaga-Suárez JA, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Charco-Mora P. Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management. Part II. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2024; 71:207-247. [PMID: 38340790 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
The Airway Management section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), and the Spanish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) present the Guide for the comprehensive management of difficult airway in adult patients. Its principles are focused on the human factors, cognitive processes for decision-making in critical situations, and optimization in the progression of strategies application to preserve adequate alveolar oxygenation in order to enhance safety and the quality of care. The document provides evidence-based recommendations, theoretical-educational tools, and implementation tools, mainly cognitive aids, applicable to airway management in the fields of anesthesiology, critical care, emergencies, and prehospital medicine. For this purpose, an extensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA-R guidelines and was analyzed using the GRADE methodology. Recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology. Recommendations for sections with low-quality evidence were based on expert opinion through consensus reached via a Delphi questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Á Gómez-Ríos
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
| | - J A Sastre
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - X Onrubia-Fuertes
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitary Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - T López
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - A Abad-Gurumeta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Casans-Francés
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena, Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - J C Garzón
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - V Martínez-Pons
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Casalderrey-Rivas
- Department of Anesthesiology. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | - M Á Fernández-Vaquero
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Martínez-Hurtado
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - L Reviriego-Agudo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - U Gutierrez-Couto
- Biblioteca, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol (CHUF), Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J García-Fernández
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; President of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - J M Fandiño Orgeira
- Emergency Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - M J Vázquez Lima
- Emergency Department, Hospital do Salnes, Vilagarcía de Arousa, Pontevedra, Spain; President of the Spanish Emergency Medicine Society (SEMES), Spain
| | - M Mayo-Yáñez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head Neck Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - P Parente-Arias
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head Neck Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J A Sistiaga-Suárez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - M Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; President of the Spanish Society for Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC), Spain
| | - P Charco-Mora
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Betend R, Suppan L, Chan M, Regard S, Sarasin F, Fehlmann CA. Association between prehospital physician clinical experience and discharge at scene - retrospective cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly 2023; 153:3533. [PMID: 38579323 DOI: 10.57187/s.3533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical experience has been shown to affect many patient-related outcomes but its impact in the prehospital setting has been little studied. OBJECTIVES To determine whether rates of discharge at scene, handover to paramedics and supervision are associated with clinical experience. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective study, performed on all prehospital interventions carried out by physicians working in a mobile medical unit ("service mobile d'urgence et de réanimationˮ [SMUR]) at Geneva University Hospitals between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. The main exclusion criteria were phone consultations and major incidents with multiple casualties. EXPOSURE The exposure was the clinical experience of the prehospital physician at the time of the intervention, in number of years since graduation. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS The main outcome was the rate of discharge at scene. Secondary outcomes were the rate of handover to paramedics and the need for senior supervision. Outcomes were tabulated and multilevel logistic regression was performed to take into account the cluster effect of physicians. RESULTS In total, 48,368 adult patients were included in the analysis. The interventions were performed by 219 different physicians, most of whom were male (53.9%) and had graduated in Switzerland (82.7%). At the time of intervention, mean (standard deviation [SD]) level of experience was 5.2 (3.3) years and the median was 4.6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.4-6.0). The overall discharge at scene rate was 7.8% with no association between clinical experience and discharge at scene rate. Greater experience was associated with a higher rate of handover to paramedics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.21) and less supervision (aOR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82-0.88). CONCLUSION In this retrospective study, there was no association between level of experience and overall rate of discharge at scene. However, greater clinical experience was associated with higher rates of handover to paramedics and less supervision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Betend
- Division of Emergency, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Suppan
- Division of Emergency, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michele Chan
- Division of Emergency, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Simon Regard
- Division of Emergency, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Cantonal Physician, General Directorate of Health, Department of Security, Population and Health, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - François Sarasin
- Division of Emergency, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christophe A Fehlmann
- Division of Emergency, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vera-López JD, Heredia-Pi IB, Pérez-Núñez R, Hijar M. [Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care]. REVISTA MEDICA DEL INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL SEGURO SOCIAL 2023; 61:819-840. [PMID: 37995348 PMCID: PMC10721338 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10064412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this paper was to identify the main indicators used to measure the performance in emergency trauma care. A literature review was carried out in the electronic databases: PubMEd, LILACS and Epistemónikos, including publications between January 2011 and December 31, 2021, in Spanish, English and Portuguese. A total of 962 publications were identified. When reviewing the full text, 48 articles were included. The indicators were classified in the dimensions of process and results. 100 different indicators were identified to analyze the performance of emergency trauma care. 71% were process indicators, including service time and triage. In the results dimension 29 indicators were identified; mortality was the indicator most analyzed as well as length of stay. Six indicators on the disability of injured people and 14 indicators related to satisfaction were identified, the most frequent being complaints. Various indicators have been used to assess the performance of emergency trauma care. In the results dimension, the indicators related to satisfaction and disability after injuries have been little explored. Decision-makers and those responsible for emergency care must promote performance evaluation exercises to learn about their current situation using appropriate and sensitive indicators with the available data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Daniel Vera-López
- Escuela de Salud Pública de México, Doctorado en Ciencias en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, Morelos, MéxicoEscuela de Salud Pública de MéxicoMéxico
| | - Ileana Beatriz Heredia-Pi
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, Morelos, MéxicoInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaMéxico
| | - Ricardo Pérez-Núñez
- Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Seguridad vial y prevención de lesiones no intencionales. Washington D.C., Estados UnidosOrganización Panamericana de la SaludEstados Unidos
| | - Martha Hijar
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, Morelos, MéxicoInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaMéxico
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thierry S, Jaulin F, Starck C, Ariès P, Schmitz J, Kerkhoff S, Bernard CI, Komorowski M, Warnecke T, Hinkelbein J. Evaluation of free-floating tracheal intubation in weightlessness via ice-pick position with a direct laryngoscopy and classic approach with indirect videolaryngoscopy. NPJ Microgravity 2023; 9:73. [PMID: 37684267 PMCID: PMC10491756 DOI: 10.1038/s41526-023-00314-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Long duration spaceflights to the Moon or Mars are at risk for emergency medical events. Managing a hypoxemic distress and performing an advanced airway procedure such as oro-tracheal intubation may be complicated under weightlessness due to ergonomic constraints. An emergency free-floating intubation would be dangerous because of high failure rates due to stabilization issues that prohibits its implementation in a space environment. Nevertheless, we hypothesized that two configurations could lead to a high first-pass success score for intubation performed by a free-floating operator. In a non-randomized, controlled, cross-over simulation study during a parabolic flight campaign, we evaluated and compared the intubation performance of free-floating trained operators, using either a conventional direct laryngoscope in an ice-pick position or an indirect laryngoscopy with a video-laryngoscope in a classic position at the head of a high-fidelity simulation manikin, in weightlessness and in normogravity. Neither of the two tested conditions reached the minimal terrestrial ILCOR recommendations (95% first-pass success) and therefore could not be recommended for general implementation under weightlessness conditions. Free-floating video laryngoscopy at the head of the manikin had a significant better success score than conventional direct laryngoscopy in an ice-pick position. Our results, combined with the preexisting literature, emphasis the difficulties of performing oro-tracheal intubation, even for experts using modern airway devices, under postural instability in weightlessness. ClinicalTrials registration number NCT05303948.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séamus Thierry
- Anaesthesiology Department, South Brittany General Hospital, 56100, Lorient, France.
- Space Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
- Medical Simulation Centre B3S, 56100, Lorient, France.
- Laboratoire Psychologie, Cognition, Communication, Comportement, Université Bretagne Sud, 56000, Vannes, France.
| | - François Jaulin
- Sorbonne Medical University, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Human Factor in Healthcare Association, Group FHS, Paris, France
| | - Clément Starck
- Space Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany
- Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Brest, 29200, Brest, France
| | - Philippe Ariès
- Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Brest, 29200, Brest, France
| | - Jan Schmitz
- Space Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Kerkhoff
- Space Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany
| | - Cécile Isabelle Bernard
- Laboratoire Psychologie, Cognition, Communication, Comportement, Université Bretagne Sud, 56000, Vannes, France
| | - Matthieu Komorowski
- Space Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tobias Warnecke
- Space Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hospital of Oldenburg, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Hinkelbein
- Space Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ji F, Zhou X. Effect of prehospital intubation on mortality rates in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scott Med J 2023; 68:80-90. [PMID: 37499223 DOI: 10.1177/00369330231189886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is unclear if prehospital intubation improves survival in patients with traumatic brain injury. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of prehospital intubation on mortality rates of traumatic brain injury. METHODS PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched without any language restriction up to 20 June 2022 for all types of comparative studies reporting survival of traumatic brain injury patients based on prehospital intubation. RESULTS In total, 18 studies with 41,185 patients were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that traumatic brain injury patients receiving prehospital intubation had higher odds of mortality as compared to those not receiving prehospital intubation. Meta-analysis of adjusted data also indicated that prehospital intubation was associated with increased odds of mortality in traumatic brain injury patients. The results did not change on sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analysis based on study type, the severity of traumatic brain injury, inclusion of isolated traumatic brain injury, emergency department intubation in the control group, and prehospital intubation group sample size demonstrated variable results. CONCLUSION Heterogeneous data from mostly observational studies demonstrates higher mortality rates among traumatic brain injury patients receiving prehospital intubation. The efficacy of prehospital intubation is difficult to judge without taking into account multiple confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Ji
- Department of Emergency, Lishui People's Hospital, Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiaohui Zhou
- Department of Emergency, Lishui People's Hospital, Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al-Sayed MF, Tarek El-Wakad M, Hassan MA, Soliman AM, Eldesoky AS. Optimal Concentration and Duration of Endotracheal Tube Coating to Achieve Optimal Antimicrobial Efficacy and Safety Balance: An In Vitro Study. Gels 2023; 9:gels9050414. [PMID: 37233005 DOI: 10.3390/gels9050414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and genuine complication in fundamentally sick patients accepting mechanical ventilation. Silver nitrate sol-gel (SN) has been proposed as a potential preventative measure against VAP. Be that as it may, the arrangement of SN with distinctive concentrations and pH values remains a basic factor influencing its effectiveness. METHODS Silver nitrate sol-gel was arranged with distinctive concentrations (0.1852%, 0.03496%, 0.1852%, and 0.01968%) and pH values (8.5, 7.0, 8.0, and 5.0) separately. The antimicrobial action of the silver nitrate and NaOH arrangements were assessed against Escherichia coli as a reference strain. The thickness and pH of the arrangements were measured, and biocompatibility tests were performed on the coating tube. The auxiliary changes in the endotracheal tube (ETT) tests after treatment were analyzed utilizing electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). RESULTS The pH estimations of the diverse arrangements showed that the pH values shifted depending on the test conditions, with pH values extending from 5.0 to 8.5. The consistency estimations of the arrangements showed that the thickness values expanded as the pH values drew closer to 7.5 and diminished when the pH values went over 7.5. The antimicrobial action of the silver nitrate and NaOH arrangements were successful against Escherichia coli, with microbial checks decreasing in concentration (0.03496%, 0.1852% (pH: 8), and 0.01968%). The biocompatibility tests revealed tall cell reasonability rates, demonstrating that the coating tube was secure for therapeutic utilization and did not hurt typical cells. The SEM and TEM investigation gave visual proof of the antibacterial impacts of the silver nitrate and NaOH arrangements on the bacterial surface or interior of the bacterial cells. Moreover, the investigation revealed that a concentration of 0.03496% was the foremost successful in hindering the development of ETT bacterial colonization at the nanoscale level. CONCLUSIONS We propose that cautious control and alteration of the pH and thickness of the arrangements are essential to guaranteeing the reproducibility and quality of the sol-gel materials. The silver nitrate and NaOH arrangements may serve as a potential preventative degree against VAP in sick patients, with a concentration of 0.03496% appearing to show the most elevated viability. The coating tube may serve as a secure and viable preventative measure against VAP in sick patients. Further investigation is required to optimize the concentration and introduction time of the arrangements to maximize their adequacy in avoiding VAP in real-world clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manar Fathy Al-Sayed
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo 11511, Egypt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Higher Technological Institute, Cairo 11511, Egypt
| | | | - Mohammed A Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo 11511, Egypt
| | - Ahmed M Soliman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo 11511, Egypt
| | - Amal S Eldesoky
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Higher Technological Institute, Cairo 11511, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lulla A, Lumba-Brown A, Totten AM, Maher PJ, Badjatia N, Bell R, Donayri CTJ, Fallat ME, Hawryluk GWJ, Goldberg SA, Hennes HMA, Ignell SP, Ghajar J, Krzyzaniak BP, Lerner EB, Nishijima D, Schleien C, Shackelford S, Swartz E, Wright DW, Zhang R, Jagoda A, Bobrow BJ. Prehospital Guidelines for the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury - 3rd Edition. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023:1-32. [PMID: 37079803 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2187905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Al Lulla
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Angela Lumba-Brown
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Annette M Totten
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Patrick J Maher
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Neeraj Badjatia
- Department of Neurocritical Care, Neurology, Anesthesiology, Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Randy Bell
- Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Mary E Fallat
- Hiram C. Polk Jr Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Louisville, Norton Children's Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Gregory W J Hawryluk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic and Akron General Hospital, Fairlawn, Ohio
| | - Scott A Goldberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Halim M A Hennes
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Steven P Ignell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jamshid Ghajar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | - E Brooke Lerner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Daniel Nishijima
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Charles Schleien
- Pediatric Critical Care, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Uniondale, New York
| | - Stacy Shackelford
- Trauma and Critical Care, USAF Center for Sustainment of Trauma Readiness Skills, Seattle, Washington
| | - Erik Swartz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts
| | - David W Wright
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rachel Zhang
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Andy Jagoda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Bentley J Bobrow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bossers SM, Mansvelder F, Loer SA, Boer C, Bloemers FW, Van Lieshout EMM, Den Hartog D, Hoogerwerf N, van der Naalt J, Absalom AR, Schwarte LA, Twisk JWR, Schober P. Association between prehospital end-tidal carbon dioxide levels and mortality in patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:491-504. [PMID: 37074395 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07012-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Severe traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, and these patients are frequently intubated in the prehospital setting. Cerebral perfusion and intracranial pressure are influenced by the arterial partial pressure of CO2 and derangements might induce further brain damage. We investigated which lower and upper limits of prehospital end-tidal CO2 levels are associated with increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. METHODS The BRAIN-PROTECT study is an observational multicenter study. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury, treated by Dutch Helicopter Emergency Medical Services between February 2012 and December 2017, were included. Follow-up continued for 1 year after inclusion. End-tidal CO2 levels were measured during prehospital care and their association with 30-day mortality was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 1776 patients were eligible for analysis. An L-shaped association between end-tidal CO2 levels and 30-day mortality was observed (p = 0.01), with a sharp increase in mortality with values below 35 mmHg. End-tidal CO2 values between 35 and 45 mmHg were associated with better survival rates compared to < 35 mmHg. No association between hypercapnia and mortality was observed. The odds ratio for the association between hypocapnia (< 35 mmHg) and mortality was 1.89 (95% CI 1.53-2.34, p < 0.001) and for hypercapnia (≥ 45 mmHg) 0.83 (0.62-1.11, p = 0.212). CONCLUSION A safe zone of 35-45 mmHg for end-tidal CO2 guidance seems reasonable during prehospital care. Particularly, end-tidal partial pressures of less than 35 mmHg were associated with a significantly increased mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan M Bossers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Floor Mansvelder
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephan A Loer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christa Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank W Bloemers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit Dept. of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Den Hartog
- Trauma Research Unit Dept. of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nico Hoogerwerf
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud Unversity Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 3, Zeelandsedijk 10, Volkel, The Netherlands
| | - Joukje van der Naalt
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anthony R Absalom
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Schober
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Butterfield M, Bodnar D, Williamson F, Parker L, Ryan G. Prevalence of secondary insults and outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury intubated in the prehospital setting: a retrospective cohort study. Emerg Med J 2023; 40:167-174. [PMID: 36604161 PMCID: PMC9985756 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehospital neuroprotective strategies aim to prevent secondary insults (SIs) in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This includes haemodynamic optimisation in addition to oxygenation and ventilation targets achieved through rapid sequence intubation (RSI).The primary aim was to report the incidence and prevalence of SIs (prolonged hypotension, prolonged hypoxia and hyperventilation) and outcomes of patients with TBI who were intubated in the prehospital setting. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of adult patients with TBI who underwent RSI by a metropolitan road-based service in South-East Queensland, Australia between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of any SI sustained. Prolonged SIs were defined as occurring for ≥5 min. The association between SIs and mortality was examined in multivariable logistic regression and reported with adjusted ORs (aORs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS 277 patients were included for analysis. Median 'Head' Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score were 4 (IQR: 3-5) and 26 (IQR: 17-34), respectively. Most episodes of prolonged hypotension and prolonged hypoxia were detected with the first patient contact on scene. Overall, 28-day mortality was 26%. Patients who sustained any SI had a higher mortality than those sustaining no SI (34.9% vs 14.7%, p<0.001). Prolonged hypoxia was an independent predictor of mortality (aOR 4.86 (95% CI 1.65 to 15.61)) but not prolonged hypotension (aOR 1.45 (95% CI 0.5 to 4.25)) or an end-tidal carbon dioxide <30 mm Hg on hospital arrival (aOR 1.28 (95% CI 0.5 to 3.21)). CONCLUSION SIs were common in the early phase of prehospital care. The association of prolonged hypoxia and mortality in TBI is potentially more significant than previously recognised, and if corrected early, may improve outcomes. There may be a greater role for bystander intervention in prevention of early hypoxic insult in TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Butterfield
- Emergency Department, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia .,LifeFlight Retrieval Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daniel Bodnar
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Frances Williamson
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lachlan Parker
- Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Glenn Ryan
- Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bossers SM, Schwarte LA, Loer SA, Schober P. Prehospital tracheal intubation in severe traumatic brain injury. Comment on Br J Anaesth 129: 977-84. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:e408-e409. [PMID: 36593164 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan M Bossers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stephan A Loer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Schober
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maissan IM, Hollestelle RV, Rijs K, Jaspers S, Hoeks S, Haitsma IK, den Hartog D, Stolker RJ. Intravenous lidocaine attenuates distention of the optical nerve sheath, a correlate of intracranial pressure, during endotracheal intubation. Minerva Anestesiol 2023; 89:131-137. [PMID: 36287389 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.22.16574-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND By preventing hypoxia and hypercapnia, advanced airway management can save lives among patients with traumatic brain injury. During endotracheal intubation (ETI), tracheal stimulation causes an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), which may impair brain perfusion. It has been suggested that intravenous lidocaine might attenuate this ICP response. We hypothesized that adding lidocaine to the standard induction medication for general anesthesia might reduce the ICP response to ETI. Here, we measured the optical nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) as a correlate of ICP and evaluated the effect of intravenous lidocaine on ONSD during and after ETI in patients undergoing anesthesia. METHODS This double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial included 60 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II physical status that were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. In addition to the standard anesthesia medication, 30 subjects received 1.5 mg/kg 1% lidocaine (0.15 mL/kg, ONSD lidocaine) and 30 received 0.15 mL/kg 0.9% NaCl (ONSD placebo). ONSDs were measured with ultrasound on the left eye, before (T0), during (T1), and 4 times after ETI (T2-5 at 5-min intervals). RESULTS Compared to placebo, lidocaine did not significantly affect the baseline ONSD after anesthesia induction measured at T0. During ETI, the ONSD lidocaine was significantly smaller (β=-0.24 mm P=0.022) than the ONSD placebo. At T4 and T5, the ONSD placebo increased steadily, up to 20 min after ETI, but the ONSD lidocaine tended to return to baseline levels. CONCLUSIONS We found that the ONSD was distended during and after ETI in anesthetized patients, and intravenous lidocaine attenuated this effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iscander M Maissan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands -
| | - Rutger V Hollestelle
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen Rijs
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Selma Jaspers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne Hoeks
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iain K Haitsma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis den Hartog
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Stolker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maurya I, Maurya VP, Mishra R, Moscote-Salazar LR, Janjua T, Yunus M, Agrawal A. Airway Management of Suspected Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in the Emergency Room. INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA 2023. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AbstractThe patients of trauma offers a special challenge because of the associated head injury, maxillofacial, neck and spine injuries, which puts the airway at imminent risk. The response time for the emergency team to initiate the airway management determines the outcome of the individual undergoing treatment. A judious implementatin of triage and ATLS guidelines are helpful in the allocation of resources in airway management of trauma patients. One must not get distracted with the severity of other organ systems because cerebral tissue permits a low threshold to the hypoxic insults. Adequate preparedness and a team effort result in better airway management and improved outcomes in trauma patients with variable hemodynamic response to resuscitation. All possible efforts must be made to secure a definitive airway (if required) and should be verified clinically as well as with the available adjuncts. The success of a trauma team depends on the familiarity to the airways devices and their discrete application in various situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indubala Maurya
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Kalyan Singh Super Specialty Cancer Institute, CG City, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Rakesh Mishra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Tariq Janjua
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Physician Regional Medical Center, Naples, Florida, United States
| | - Mohd Yunus
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Saket Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Amit Agrawal
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Saket Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koch DA, Hagebusch P, Faul P, Steinfeldt T, Hoffmann R, Schweigkofler U. Analysis of the primary utilization of videolaryngoscopy in prehospital emergency care in Germany. DIE ANAESTHESIOLOGIE 2023; 72:245-252. [PMID: 36602556 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-022-01247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2019, the German prehospital airway management guidelines were published. One of the recommendations was the primary utilization of videolaryngoscopy (VL) for every prehospital endotracheal intubation (phETI). Guideline compliance is extremely important in emergency medicine as non-compliance in the worst-case scenario leads to death. The study aims to quantify guideline compliance among emergency medical service (EMS) physicians and, subsequently to analyze subgroups influencing compliance. MATERIAL AND METHODS An online survey was developed and distributed as a hyperlink via email to all medical directors of EMS (n = 155) and the three main operators of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) in Germany. The survey was online from August 1st 2021 until October 3rd 2021. The primary outcome measure was the primary VL utilization. Data were evaluated descriptively. A multivariate regression analysis was used to determine associations between the primary VL utilization and age, sex, educational level, specialization, phETI per year, operating field, VL device type, and guideline knowledge. RESULTS The analysis included 698 EMS physicians. More than 55% of the EMS physicians do not primarily use a videolaryngoscope for phETI. Multivariate regression analysis showed a significantly higher compliance if the devices C‑MAC® or McGrath® were on board, guidelines were known or EMS physicians were female. Age, educational level, specialization or prehospital intubation experience had no significant impact. CONCLUSION The study shows non-compliance with prehospital airway management guidelines in Germany. The guideline recommendation is based on scientific evidence but is not yet generally accepted by all EMS physicians. Videolaryngoscope device type and sex seem to influence the primary VL utilization. Training for EMS physicians must be extended and individual prehospital airway management should be reconsidered by every EMS physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Anthony Koch
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Paul Hagebusch
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Faul
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thorsten Steinfeldt
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Reinhard Hoffmann
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Uwe Schweigkofler
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Treatment of pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury by Dutch Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277528. [PMID: 36584019 PMCID: PMC9803178 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sparse data are available on prehospital care by Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) for pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study focusses on prehospital interventions, neurosurgical interventions and mortality in this group. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric (0-18 years of age) patients with TBI treated by Rotterdam HEMS. RESULTS From January 2012 to December 2017 415 pediatric (<18 years of age) patients with TBI were included. Intubation was required in in 92 of 111 patients with GCS ≤ 8, 92 (82.9%), compared to 12 of 77 (15.6%) with GCS 9-12, and 7 of 199 (3.5%) with GCS 13-15. Hyperosmolar therapy (HSS) was started in 73 patients, 10 with a GCS ≤8. Decompressive surgery was required in 16 (5.8%), nine patients (56.3%) of these received HSS from HEMS. Follow-up data was available in 277 patients. A total of 107 (38.6%) patients were admitted to a (P)ICU. Overall mortality rate was 6.3%(n = 25) all with GCS ≤8, 15 (60.0%) died within 24 hours and 24 (96.0%) within a week. Patients with neurosurgical interventions (N = 16) showed a higher mortality rate (18.0%). CONCLUSIONS The Dutch HEMS provides essential emergency care for pediatric TBI patients, by performing medical procedures outside of regular EMS protocol. Mortality was highest in patients with severe TBI (n = 111) (GCS≤8) and in those who required neurosurgical interventions. Despite a relatively good initial GCS (>8) score, there were patients who required prehospital intubation and HSS. This group will require further investigation to optimize care in the future.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bossers SM, Verheul R, van Zwet EW, Bloemers FW, Giannakopoulos GF, Loer SA, Schwarte LA, Schober P. Prehospital Intubation of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Dutch Nationwide Trauma Registry Analysis. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2022:1-7. [PMID: 36074561 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2119494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
ObjectivePatients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are commonly intubated during prehospital treatment despite a lack of evidence that this is beneficial. Accumulating evidence even suggests that prehospital intubation may be hazardous, in particular when performed by inexperienced EMS clinicians. To expand the limited knowledge base, we studied the relationship between prehospital intubation and hospital mortality in patients with severe TBI in a large Dutch trauma database. We specifically hypothesized that the relationship differs depending on whether a physician-based emergency medical service (EMS) was involved in the treatment, as opposed to intubation by paramedics.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed using the Dutch Nationwide Trauma Registry that includes all trauma patients in the Netherlands who are admitted to any hospital with an emergency department. All patients treated for severe TBI (Head Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥4) between January 2015 and December 2019 were selected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between prehospital intubation and mortality while adjusting for potential confounders. An interaction term between prehospital intubation and the involvement of physician-based EMS was added to the model. Complete case analysis as well as multiple imputation were performed.Results8946 patients (62% male, median age 63 years) were analyzed. The hospital mortality was 26.4%. Overall, a relationship between prehospital intubation and higher mortality was observed (complete case: OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.35-2.57, P < 0.001; multiple imputation: OR 1.92, 95%CI 1.56-2.36, P < 0.001). Adding the interaction revealed that the relationship of prehospital intubation may depend on whether physician-based EMS is involved in the treatment (complete case: P = 0.044; multiple imputation: P = 0.062). Physician-based EMS involvement attenuated but did not completely remove the detrimental association between prehospital intubation and mortality.ConclusionThe data do not support the common practice of prehospital intubation. The effect of prehospital intubation on mortality might depend on EMS clinician experience, and it seems prudent to involve prehospital personnel well proficient in prehospital intubation whenever intubation is potentially required. The decision to perform prehospital intubation should not merely be based on the largely unsupported dogma that it is generally needed in severe TBI, but should rather individually weigh potential benefits and harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan M Bossers
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Verheul
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik W van Zwet
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Frank W Bloemers
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Georgios F Giannakopoulos
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stephan A Loer
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Schober
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Boccio E. Letter to editor in response to Vlatten et al. study Randomized trial of three airway management techniques for restricted access in a simulated pediatric scenario. Am J Emerg Med 2022; 60:179-180. [PMID: 36031483 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Boccio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School - Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA; Department of Healthcare Delivery & Population Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School - Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa. BMC Emerg Med 2022; 22:129. [PMID: 35842578 PMCID: PMC9287876 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00688-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prehospital advanced airway management, including endotracheal intubation (ETI), is one of the most commonly performed advanced life support skills. In South Africa, prehospital ETI is performed by non-physician prehospital providers. This practice has recently come under scrutiny due to lower first pass (FPS) and overall success rates, a high incidence of adverse events (AEs), and limited evidence regarding the impact of ETI on mortality. The aim of this study was to describe non-physician ETI in a South African national sample in terms of patient demographics, indications for intubation, means of intubation and success rates. A secondary aim was to determine what factors were predictive of first pass success. Methods This study was a retrospective chart review of prehospital ETIs performed by non-physician prehospital providers, between 01 January 2017 and 31 December 2017. Two national private Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and one provincial public EMS were sampled. Data were analysed descriptively and summarised. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors that affect the likelihood of FPS. Results A total of 926 cases were included. The majority of cases were adults (n = 781, 84.3%) and male (n = 553, 57.6%). The most common pathologies requiring emergency treatment were head injury, including traumatic brain injury (n = 328, 35.4%), followed by cardiac arrest (n = 204, 22.0%). The mean time on scene was 46 minutes (SD = 28.3). The most cited indication for intubation was decreased level of consciousness (n = 515, 55.6%), followed by cardiac arrest (n = 242, 26.9%) and ineffective ventilation (n = 96, 10.4%). Rapid sequence intubation (RSI, n = 344, 37.2%) was the most common approach. The FPS rate was 75.3%, with an overall success rate of 95.7%. Intubation failed in 33 (3.6%) patients. The need for ventilation was inversely associated with FPS (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.88, p = 0.02); while deep sedation (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36–0.88, p = 0.13) and no drugs (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.90, p = 0.02) compared to RSI was less likely to result in FPS. Increased scene time (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.985–0.997, p < 0.01) was inversely associated FPS. Conclusion This is one of the first and largest studies evaluating prehospital ETI in Africa. In this sample of ground-based EMS non-physician ETI, we found success rates similar to those reported in the literature. More research is needed to determine AE rates and the impact of ETI on patient outcome. There is an urgent need to standardise prehospital ETI reporting in South Africa to facilitate future research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00688-4.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia and Intubation Location in Adults with Traumatic Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 93:e130-e138. [PMID: 35789149 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients, particularly those who present with traumatic injuries. This review aims to determine whether patients with traumatic injuries who are intubated in the prehospital setting are at higher risk of developing VAP compared to those intubated in the hospital. METHODS A systematic review of Medline, Scopus and Cochrane electronic databases was conducted from inception through January 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients with traumatic injuries who were intubated in the prehospital or hospital settings with VAP as an outcome. Using a random effects model, the risk of VAP across study arms was compared by calculating a summary relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The results of individual studies were also summarized qualitatively. RESULTS The search identified 754 articles of which 6 studies (N = 2990) met inclusion criteria. All studies were good quality based on assessment with the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Prehospital intubation demonstrated an increased risk of VAP development in 2 of the 6 studies. Among the 6 studies, the overall quality weighted risk ratio was 1.09 (95% CI 0.90-1.31). CONCLUSIONS Traumatically injured patients who are intubated in the prehospital setting have a similar risk of developing VAP compared to those that are intubated in the hospital setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV systematic review and meta-analysis.
Collapse
|
22
|
Impact of Operator Medical Specialty on Endotracheal Intubation Rates in Prehospital Emergency Medicine—A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071992. [PMID: 35407600 PMCID: PMC8999662 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) can be challenging, and the risk of complications is higher than in the operating room. The goal of this study was to compare prehospital ETI rates between anaesthesiologists and non-anaesthesiologists. This retrospective cohort study compared prehospital interventions performed by either physicians from the anaesthesiology department (ADP) or physicians from another department (NADP, for non-anaesthesiology department physicians). The primary outcome was the prehospital ETI rate. Overall, 42,190 interventions were included in the analysis, of whom 68.5% were performed by NADP. Intubation was attempted on 2797 (6.6%) patients, without any difference between NADPs and ADPs (6.5 versus 6.7%, p = 0.555). However, ADPs were more likely to proceed to an intubation when patients were not in cardiac arrest (3.4 versus 3.0%, p = 0.026), whereas no difference was found regarding cardiac arrest patients (65.2 versus 67.7%, p = 0.243) (p for homogeneity = 0.005). In a prehospital physician-staffed emergency medical service, overall ETI rates did not depend on the frontline operator’s medical specialty background. ADPs were, however, more likely to proceed with ETI than NADPs when patients were not in cardiac arrest. Further studies should help to understand the reasons for this difference.
Collapse
|
23
|
Sepponen R, Saviluoto A, Jäntti H, Harve-Rytsälä H, Lääperi M, Nurmi J. Validation of Score to Detect Intracranial Lesions in Unconscious Patients in Prehospital Setting. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022; 31:106319. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
24
|
Maissan I, van Lieshout E, de Jong T, van Vledder M, Houmes RJ, Hartog DD, Stolker RJ. The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48:4205-4213. [PMID: 35362731 PMCID: PMC9532291 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01962-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The first-pass success rate for endotracheal intubation (ETI) depends on provider experience and exposure. We hypothesize that video laryngoscopy (VL) improves first-pass and overall ETI success rates in low and intermediate experienced airway providers and prevents from unrecognized oesophageal intubations in prehospital settings. Methods In this study 3632 patients were included. In all cases, an ambulance nurse, HEMS nurse, or HEMS physician performed prehospital ETI using direct Laryngoscopy (DL) or VL. Results First-pass ETI success rates for ambulance nurses with DL were 45.5% (391/859) and with VL 64.8% (125/193). For HEMS nurses first-pass success rates were 57.6% (34/59) and 77.2% (125/162) respectively. For HEMS physicians these successes were 85.9% (790/920) and 86.9% (1251/1439). The overall success rate for ambulance nurses with DL was 58.4% (502/859) and 77.2% (149/193) with VL. HEMS nurses successes were 72.9% (43/59) and 87.0% (141/162), respectively. HEMS physician successes were 98.7% (908/920) and 99.0% (1425/1439), respectively. The incidence of unrecognized intubations in the oesophagus before HEMS arrival in traumatic circulatory arrest (TCA) was 30.6% with DL and 37.5% with VL. In medical cardiac arrest cases the incidence was 20% with DL and 0% with VL. Conclusion First-pass and overall ETI success rates for ambulance and HEMS nurses are better with VL. The used device does not affect success rates of HEMS physicians. VL resulted in less unrecognized oesophageal intubations in medical cardiac arrests. In TCA cases VL resulted in more oesophageal intubations when performed by ambulance nurses before HEMS arrival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iscander Maissan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Esther van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Timo de Jong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark van Vledder
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Houmes
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis den Hartog
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Stolker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dufour-Neyron H, Tanguay K, Nadeau A, Emond M, Harrisson J, Robert S, Capolla-Daneau N, Groulx M, Carmichael PH, Mercier E. Prehospital Use of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Supraglottic Airway Device: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Emerg Med 2022; 62:324-331. [PMID: 35067394 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the province of Quebec (Canada), paramedics use the esophageal tracheal Combitube (ETC) for prehospital airway management. OBJECTIVES Our main objective was to determine the proportion of patients with successful ventilation achieved after ETC use. Our secondary aim was to determine the number of ETC insertion attempts required to ventilate the patient. METHOD This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who had ≥1 attempt to insert an ETC during prehospital care between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were included. Prehospital and in-hospital data were extracted. Successful ventilation was defined as thorax elevation, lung sounds on chest auscultation, or positive end-tidal capnography after ETC insertion. RESULTS A total of 580 emergency medical services interventions (99.3% cardiac arrests) were included. Most patients were men (62.5%) with a mean age 67.0 years (SD 17.6 years), and 35 (13.1%) of the 298 patients transported to emergency department survived to hospital discharge. Sufficient information to determine whether ventilation was successful or not was available for 515 interventions. Ventilation was achieved during 427 (82.7%) of these interventions. The number of ETC insertion attempts was available for 349 of the 427 successful ETC use. Overall, the first insertion resulted in successful ventilation during 294 interventions for an overall proportion of first-pass success ranging between 57.1% and 72.1%. CONCLUSION Proportions of successful ventilation and ETC first-pass success are lower than those reported in the literature with supraglottic airway devices. The reasons explaining these lower rates and their impact on patient-centered outcomes need to be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marcel Emond
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable de l'Université Laval; Département de médecine d'urgence, Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de l'Université Laval; Direction des services préhospitaliers d'urgence, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale
| | - Jessica Harrisson
- Direction des services préhospitaliers d'urgence, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale
| | - Sébastien Robert
- Département de médecine d'urgence, Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de l'Université Laval
| | - Nicolas Capolla-Daneau
- Direction des services préhospitaliers d'urgence, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale
| | | | | | - Eric Mercier
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable de l'Université Laval; Département de médecine d'urgence, Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de l'Université Laval; Direction des services préhospitaliers d'urgence, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saviluoto A, Jäntti H, Kirves H, Setälä P, Nurmi JO. Association between case volume and mortality in pre-hospital anaesthesia management: a retrospective observational cohort. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:e135-e142. [PMID: 34656323 PMCID: PMC8792835 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-hospital anaesthesia is a core competency of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). Whether physician pre-hospital anaesthesia case volume affects outcomes is unknown in this setting. We aimed to investigate whether physician case volume was associated with differences in mortality or medical management. METHODS We conducted a registry-based cohort study of patients undergoing drug-facilitated intubation by HEMS physician from January 1, 2013 to August 31, 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, analysed using multivariate logistic regression controlling for patient-dependent variables. Case volume for each patient was determined by the number of pre-hospital anaesthetics the attending physician had managed in the previous 12 months. The explanatory variable was physician case volume grouped by low (0-12), intermediate (13-36), and high (≥37) case volume. Secondary outcomes were characteristics of medical management, including the incidence of hypoxaemia and hypotension. RESULTS In 4818 patients, the physician case volume was 511, 2033, and 2274 patients in low-, intermediate-, and high-case-volume groups, respectively. Higher physician case volume was associated with lower 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.79 per logarithmic number of cases [95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.98]). High-volume physician providers had shorter on-scene times (median 28 [25th-75th percentile: 22-38], compared with intermediate 32 [23-42] and lowest 32 [23-43] case-volume groups; P<0.001) and a higher first-pass success rate for tracheal intubation (98%, compared with 93% and 90%, respectively; P<0.001). The incidence of hypoxaemia and hypotension was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Mortality appears to be lower after pre-hospital anaesthesia when delivered by physician providers with higher case volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anssi Saviluoto
- Research and Development Unit, FinnHEMS, Vantaa, Finland; University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Helena Jäntti
- Centre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hetti Kirves
- Prehospital Emergency Care, Hyvinkää Hospital Area, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Piritta Setälä
- Centre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jouni O Nurmi
- Research and Development Unit, FinnHEMS, Vantaa, Finland; Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dorsett M, Panchal AR, Stephens C, Farcas A, Leggio W, Galton C, Tripp R, Grawey T. Prehospital Airway Management Training and Education: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2022; 26:3-13. [PMID: 35001822 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1977877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAirway management competency extends beyond technical skills to encompass a comprehensive approach to optimize patient outcomes. Initial and continuing education for airway management must therefore extend beyond a narrow focus on psychomotor skills and task completion to include appreciation of underlying pathophysiology, clinical judgment, and higher-order decision making. NAEMSP recommends:Active engagement in deliberate practice should be the guiding approach for developing and maintaining competence in airway management.EMS learners and clinicians must be educated in an escalating approach to airway management, where basic airway maneuvers form the central focus.Educational activities should extend beyond fundamental knowledge to focus on the development of clinical judgment.Optimization of patient outcomes should be valued over performance of individual airway management skills.Credentialing and continuing education activities in airway management are essential to advance clinicians beyond entry-level competency.Initial and continuing education programs should be responsive to advances in the evidence base and maintain adaptability to re-assess content and expected outcomes on a continual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Dorsett
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| | - Ashish R Panchal
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| | - Christopher Stephens
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| | - Andra Farcas
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| | - William Leggio
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| | - Christopher Galton
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| | - Rickquel Tripp
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| | - Tom Grawey
- Received August 10, 2021 from Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (MD); Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (ARP); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX (CS); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD) San Diego California USA, San Diego, CA (AF); Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Austin-Travis County EMS, Austin, TX (WL); Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (CG); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (RT); Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (TG). Revision received August 31, 2021; accepted for publication September 3, 2021
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jarvis JL, Lyng JW, Miller BL, Perlmutter MC, Abraham H, Sahni R. Prehospital Drug Assisted Airway Management: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2022; 26:42-53. [PMID: 35001829 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1990447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Airway management is a critical intervention for patients with airway compromise, respiratory failure, and cardiac arrest. Many EMS agencies use drug-assisted airway management (DAAM) - the administration of sedatives alone or in combination with neuromuscular blockers - to facilitate advanced airway placement in patients with airway compromise or impending respiratory failure who also have altered mental status, agitation, or intact protective airway reflexes. While DAAM provides several benefits including improving laryngoscopy and making insertion of endotracheal tubes and supraglottic airways easier, DAAM also carries important risks. NAEMSP recommends:DAAM is an appropriate tool for EMS clinicians in systems with clear guidelines, sufficient training, and close EMS physician oversight. DAAM should not be used in settings without adequate resources.EMS physicians should develop clinical guidelines informed by evidence and oversee the training and credentialing for safe and effective DAAM.DAAM programs should include best practices of airway management including patient selection, assessmenct and positioning, preoxygenation strategies including apneic oxygenation, monitoring and management of physiologic abnormalities, selection of medications, post-intubation analgesia and sedation, equipment selection, airway confirmation and monitoring, and rescue airway techniques.Post-DAAM airway placement must be confirmed and continually monitored with waveform capnography.EMS clinicians must have the necessary equipment and training to manage patients with failed DAAM, including bag mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices and surgical airway approaches.Continuous quality improvement for DAAM must include assessment of individual and aggregate performance metrics. Where available for review, continuous physiologic recordings (vital signs, pulse oximetry, and capnography), audio and video recordings, and assessment of patient outcomes should be part of DAAM continuous quality improvement.
Collapse
|
29
|
El-Swaify ST, Refaat MA, Ali SH, Abdelrazek AEM, Beshay PW, Kamel M, Bahaa B, Amir A, Basha AK. Controversies and evidence gaps in the early management of severe traumatic brain injury: back to the ABCs. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2022; 7:e000859. [PMID: 35071780 PMCID: PMC8734008 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounts for around 30% of all trauma-related deaths. Over the past 40 years, TBI has remained a major cause of mortality after trauma. The primary injury caused by the injurious mechanical force leads to irreversible damage to brain tissue. The potentially preventable secondary injury can be accentuated by addressing systemic insults. Early recognition and prompt intervention are integral to achieve better outcomes. Consequently, surgeons still need to be aware of the basic yet integral emergency management strategies for severe TBI (sTBI). In this narrative review, we outlined some of the controversies in the early care of sTBI that have not been settled by the publication of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s 4th edition guidelines in 2017. The topics covered included the following: mode of prehospital transport, maintaining airway patency while securing the cervical spine, achieving adequate ventilation, and optimizing circulatory physiology. We discuss fluid resuscitation and blood product transfusion as components of improving circulatory mechanics and oxygen delivery to injured brain tissue. An outline of evidence-based antiplatelet and anticoagulant reversal strategies is discussed in the review. In addition, the current evidence as well as the evidence gaps for using tranexamic acid in sTBI are briefly reviewed. A brief note on the controversial emergency surgical interventions for sTBI is included. Clinicians should be aware of the latest evidence for sTBI. Periods between different editions of guidelines can have an abundance of new literature that can influence patient care. The recent advances included in this review should be considered both for formulating future guidelines for the management of sTBI and for designing future clinical studies in domains with clinical equipoise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mazen A Refaat
- Department of surgery, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sara H Ali
- Department of surgery, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | | | - Menna Kamel
- Department of surgery, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Bassem Bahaa
- Department of surgery, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Abdelrahman Amir
- Department of surgery, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Kamel Basha
- Department of neurosurgery, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zapata HA, Fort P, Roberts KD, Kaluarachchi DC, Guthrie SO. Surfactant Administration Through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airways (SALSA): A Viable Method for Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:853831. [PMID: 35372140 PMCID: PMC8966228 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.853831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Administration of liquid surfactant through an endotracheal tube for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome has been the standard of care for decades. A skilled health care provider is needed to perform this procedure. In lower-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), healthcare resources are often limited, leading to increased mortality of premature infants, many of whom would benefit from surfactant administration. Therefore, having a simplified procedure for delivery of surfactant without the need for advanced skills could be life-saving, potentially diminish gaps in care, and help ensure more equitable global neonatal survival rates. Modifications to the standard approach of surfactant administration have been put into practice and these include: INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation (INSURE), thin catheter surfactant administration (TCA), aerosolized surfactant, and surfactant administration through laryngeal or supraglottic airways (SALSA). Although there is a need for larger studies to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of these newer methods, these methods are being embraced by the global community and being implemented in various settings throughout the world. Because the SALSA technique does not require laryngoscopy, a provider skilled in laryngoscopy is not required for the procedure. Therefore, because of the ease of use and safety profile, the SALSA technique should be strongly considered as a viable method of delivering surfactant in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry A Zapata
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Prem Fort
- Department of Pediatrics, Maternal, Fetal, Neonatal Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL, United States.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kari D Roberts
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Dinushan C Kaluarachchi
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Scott O Guthrie
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Alenazi A, Alotaibi B, Saleh N, Alshibani A, Alharbi M, Aljerian N, Alharthy N, Alsomali S. Perception and success rate of using advanced airway management by hospital-based paramedics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Br Paramed J 2021; 6:24-30. [PMID: 34970079 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2021.12.6.3.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The study aimed to measure the success rate of pre-hospital tracheal intubation (TI) and supraglottic airway devices (SADs) performed by paramedics for adult patients and to assess the perception of paramedics of advanced airway management. Method The study consisted of two phases: phase 1 was a retrospective analysis to assess the TI and SADs' success rates when applied by paramedics for adult patients aged >14 years from 2012 to 2017, and phase 2 was a distributed questionnaire to assess paramedics' perception of advanced airway management. Result In phase 1, 24 patients met our inclusion criteria. Sixteen (67%) patients had TI, of whom five had failed TI but then were successfully managed using SADs. The TI success rate was 69% from the first two attempts compared to SADs (100% from first attempt). In phase 2, 63/90 (70%) paramedics responded to the questionnaire, of whom 60 (95%) completed it. Forty-eight (80%) paramedics classified themselves to be moderately or very competent with advanced airway management. However, most of them (80%) performed only 1-5 TIs or SADs a year. Conclusion Hospital-based paramedics (i.e. paramedics who are working at hospitals and not in the ambulance service, and who mostly respond to small restricted areas in Saudi Arabia) handled few patients requiring advanced airway management and had a higher competency level with SADs than with TI. The study findings could be impacted by the low sample size. Future research is needed on the success rate and impact on outcomes of using pre-hospital advanced airway management, and on the challenges of mechanical ventilation use during interfacility transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amani Alenazi
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)
| | | | | | | | - Meshal Alharbi
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)
| | | | - Nesrin Alharthy
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Botha JC, Lourens A, Stassen W. Rapid sequence intubation: a survey of current practice in the South African pre-hospital setting. Int J Emerg Med 2021; 14:45. [PMID: 34404352 PMCID: PMC8369626 DOI: 10.1186/s12245-021-00368-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an advanced airway skill commonly performed in the pre-hospital setting globally. In South Africa, pre-hospital RSI was first approved for non-physician providers by the Health Professions Council of South Africa in 2009 and introduced as part of the scope of practice of degree qualified Emergency Care Practitioners (ECPs) only. The research study aimed to investigate and describe, based on the components of the minimum standards of pre-hospital RSI in South Africa, specific areas of interest related to current pre-hospital RSI practice. Methods An online descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst operational ECPs in the pre-hospital setting of South Africa, using convenience and snowball sampling strategies. Results A total of 87 participants agreed to partake. Eleven (12.6%) incomplete survey responses were excluded while 76 (87.4%) were included in the data analysis. The survey response rate could not be calculated. Most participants were operational in Gauteng (n = 27, 35.5%) and the Western Cape (n = 25, 32.9%). Overall participants reported that their education and training were perceived as being of good quality. The majority of participants (n = 69, 90.8%) did not participate in an internship programme before commencing duties as an independent practitioner. Most RSI and post-intubation equipment were reported to be available; however, our results found that introducer stylets and/or bougies and end-tidal carbon dioxide devices are not available to some participants. Only 50 (65.8%) participants reported the existence of a clinical governance system within their organisation. Furthermore, our results indicate a lack of clinical feedback, deficiency of an RSI database, infrequent clinical review meetings and a shortage of formal consultation frameworks. Conclusion The practice of safe and effective pre-hospital RSI, performed by non-physician providers or ECPs, relies on comprehensive implementation and adherence to all the components of the minimum standards. Although there is largely an apparent alignment with the minimum standards, recurrent revision of practice needs to occur to ensure alignment with recommendations. Additionally, some areas may benefit from further research to improve current practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-021-00368-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Catharina Botha
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Andrit Lourens
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Willem Stassen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rosenthal ES, Elm JJ, Ingles J, Rogers AJ, Terndrup TE, Holsti M, Thomas DG, Babcock L, Okada PJ, Lipsky RH, Miller JB, Hickey RW, Barra ME, Bleck TP, Cloyd JC, Silbergleit R, Lowenstein DH, Coles LD, Kapur J, Shinnar S, Chamberlain JM. Early Neurologic Recovery, Practice Pattern Variation, and the Risk of Endotracheal Intubation Following Established Status Epilepticus. Neurology 2021; 96:e2372-e2386. [PMID: 34032604 PMCID: PMC8166444 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the association between early neurologic recovery, practice pattern variation, and endotracheal intubation during established status epilepticus, we performed a secondary analysis within the cohort of patients enrolled in the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT). METHODS We evaluated factors associated with the endpoint of endotracheal intubation occurring within 120 minutes of ESETT study drug initiation. We defined a blocked, stepwise multivariate regression, examining 4 phases during status epilepticus management: (1) baseline characteristics, (2) acute treatment, (3) 20-minute neurologic recovery, and (4) 60-minute recovery, including seizure cessation and improving responsiveness. RESULTS Of 478 patients, 117 (24.5%) were intubated within 120 minutes. Among high-enrolling sites, intubation rates ranged from 4% to 32% at pediatric sites and 19% to 39% at adult sites. Baseline characteristics, including seizure precipitant, benzodiazepine dosing, and admission vital signs, provided limited discrimination for predicting intubation (area under the curve [AUC] 0.63). However, treatment at sites with an intubation rate in the highest (vs lowest) quartile strongly predicted endotracheal intubation independently of other treatment variables (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.08-21.4, model AUC 0.70). Site-specific variation was the factor most strongly associated with endotracheal intubation after adjustment for 20-minute (aOR 23.4, 95% CI 6.99-78.3, model AUC 0.88) and 60-minute (aOR 14.7, 95% CI 3.20-67.5, model AUC 0.98) neurologic recovery. CONCLUSIONS Endotracheal intubation after established status epilepticus is strongly associated with site-specific practice pattern variation, independently of baseline characteristics, and early neurologic recovery and should not alone serve as a clinical trial endpoint in established status epilepticus. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01960075.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S Rosenthal
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.
| | - Jordan J Elm
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - James Ingles
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Alexander J Rogers
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas E Terndrup
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Maija Holsti
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Danny G Thomas
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Lynn Babcock
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Pamela J Okada
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Robert H Lipsky
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Joseph B Miller
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Robert W Hickey
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Megan E Barra
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas P Bleck
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - James C Cloyd
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Robert Silbergleit
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Daniel H Lowenstein
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Lisa D Coles
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jaideep Kapur
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Shlomo Shinnar
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - James M Chamberlain
- From the Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Division of Neurocritical Care (E.S.R.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Pharmacy (M.E.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Public Health Sciences (J.J.E., J.I.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Departments of Emergency Medicine (A.J.R., R.S.) and Pediatrics (A.J.R.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.E.T.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (M.H.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Pediatrics (D.G.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Division of Emergency Medicine (L.B.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (P.J.O.), Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurosciences (R.H.L.), Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.B.M.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.W.H.), Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA; Feinberg School of Medicine (T.P.B.), Northwestern University and Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (J.C.C., L.D.C.), College of Pharmacy and Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Neurology (D.H.L.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (J.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Montefiore Medical Center (S.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and Division of Emergency Medicine (J.M.C.), Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bossers SM, van der Naalt J, Jacobs B, Schwarte LA, Verheul R, Schober P. Face-to-Face Versus Telephonic Extended Glasgow Outcome Score Testing After Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2021; 36:E134-E138. [PMID: 33201032 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) is used for objective assessment of functional outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). In situations where face-to-face contact is not feasible, telephonic assessment of the GOS-E might be desirable. The aim of this study is to assess the level of agreement between face-to-face and telephonic assessment of the GOS-E. SETTING Multicenter study in 2 Dutch University Medical Centers. Inclusion was performed in the outpatient clinic (face-to-face assessment, by experienced neurologist), followed by assessment via telephone of the GOS-E after ±2 weeks (by trained researcher). PARTICIPANTS Patients ±6 months after TBI. DESIGN Prospective validation study. MAIN MEASURES Interrater agreement of the GOS-E was assessed with Cohen's weighted κ. RESULTS From May 2014 until March 2018, 50 patients were enrolled; 54% were male (mean age 49.1 years). Median time between trauma and in-person GOS-E examination was 158 days and median time between face-to-face and telephonic GOS-E was 15 days. The quadratic weighted κ was 0.79. Sensitivity analysis revealed a quadratic weighted κ of 0.77, 0.78, and 0.70 for moderate-severe, complicated mild, and uncomplicated mild TBI, respectively. CONCLUSION No disagreements of more than 1 point on the GOS-E were observed, with the κ value representing good or substantial agreement. Assessment of the GOS-E via telephone is a valid alternative to the face-to-face interview when in-person contact is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan M Bossers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Bossers, Schwarte, Verheul, and Schober); and Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (Drs van der Naalt and Jacobs)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Haddad N, Tsur AM, Nadler R, Glassberg E, Benov A, Chen J. Inexperienced but Confident: A Survey of Advanced Life Support Providers and Life-saving Interventions in the Israel Defense Forces. Mil Med 2021; 186:261-265. [PMID: 33499523 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usaa465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the current experience of Israel Defense Forces' (IDF) advanced life support (ALS) providers in performing life-saving interventions (LSIs), the rate of doctors and paramedics achieving the Trauma and Combat Medicine Branch benchmarks, and the rate of providers feeling confident in performing the interventions although not achieving the benchmarks. METHODS This study was based on an online survey delivered to IDF ALS providers. The survey investigated demographics; experience in performing endotracheal intubation, cricothyroidotomy, tube thoracostomy, and intraosseous access on human patients; and confidence in performing these LSIs. All benchmarks chosen referred to the number of times performed in the previous year. The benchmarks were 20 for intubation, 3 for cricothyroidotomy, 4 for tube thoracostomy, and 3 for intraosseous access. RESULTS During the survey period, 175 IDF ALS providers started the survey, but only 138 (79%) completed it, 93 (67%) of them were paramedics. Doctors had higher rates than paramedics of failing to achieve the benchmarks for intubation (96 vs. 57%, P < .001) and intraosseous access (100 vs. 66%, P < .001). All respondents failed to achieve the benchmark for cricothyroidotomy, and all but one paramedic failed to achieve the tube thoracostomy benchmark. Doctors had lower rates of high confidence when failing to achieve the benchmark for intubation (35 vs. 64%, P = .008) and intraosseous access (7 vs. 31%, P = .005) compared to paramedics. CONCLUSION IDF ALS providers have alarmingly limited experience in performing LSIs. Many of them are confident in their ability despite not achieving evidence-based benchmarks. Additional training is required, maybe as a part of an annual medical fitness test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadav Haddad
- Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General's Headquarters, Military POB 02149 Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Military Postal Code, Israel.,The Joyce & Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel
| | - Avishai M Tsur
- Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General's Headquarters, Military POB 02149 Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Military Postal Code, Israel
| | - Roy Nadler
- Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General's Headquarters, Military POB 02149 Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Military Postal Code, Israel
| | - Elon Glassberg
- Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General's Headquarters, Military POB 02149 Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Military Postal Code, Israel
| | - Avi Benov
- Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General's Headquarters, Military POB 02149 Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Military Postal Code, Israel.,The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-ilan University Ramat-gan, 5290002, Israel
| | - Jacob Chen
- Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General's Headquarters, Military POB 02149 Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Military Postal Code, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Takahashi CE, Virmani D, Chung DY, Ong C, Cervantes-Arslanian AM. Blunt and Penetrating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurol Clin 2021; 39:443-469. [PMID: 33896528 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2021.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Severe traumatic brain injury is a common problem. Current practices focus on the importance of early resuscitation, transfer to high-volume centers, and provider expertise across multiple specialties. In the emergency department, patients should receive urgent intracranial imaging and consideration for tranexamic acid. Close observation in the intensive care unit environment helps identify problems, such as seizure, intracranial pressure crisis, and injury progression. In addition to traditional neurologic examination, patients benefit from use of intracranial monitors. Monitors gather physiologic data on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures to help guide therapy. Brain tissue oxygenation monitoring and cerebromicrodialysis show promise in studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney E Takahashi
- Department of Neurology, Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, Collamore, C-3, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| | - Deepti Virmani
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, Collamore, C-3, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - David Y Chung
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, Collamore, C-3, Boston, MA 02118, USA; Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charlene Ong
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, Collamore, C-3, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Anna M Cervantes-Arslanian
- Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, Collamore, C-3, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Suppan L, Chan M, Gartner B, Regard S, Campana M, Chatellard G, Cottet P, Larribau R, Sarasin FP, Niquille M. Evaluation of a Prehospital Rotation by Senior Residents: A Web-Based Survey. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 9:healthcare9010024. [PMID: 33383633 PMCID: PMC7824315 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9010024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The added value of prehospital emergency medicine is usually assessed by measuring patient-centered outcomes. Prehospital rotations might however also help senior residents acquire specific skills and knowledge. To assess the perceived added value of the prehospital rotation in comparison with other rotations, we analyzed web-based questionnaires sent between September 2011 and August 2020 to senior residents who had just completed a prehospital rotation. The primary outcome was the perceived benefit of the prehospital rotation in comparison with other rotations regarding technical and non-technical skills. Secondary outcomes included resident satisfaction regarding the prehospital rotation and regarding supervision. A pre-specified subgroup analysis was performed to search for differences according to the participants’ service of origin (anesthesiology, emergency medicine, or internal medicine). The completion rate was of 71.5% (113/158), and 91 surveys were analyzed. Most senior residents found the prehospital rotation either more beneficial or much more beneficial than other rotations regarding the acquisition of technical and non-technical skills. Anesthesiology residents reported less benefits than other residents regarding pharmacological knowledge acquisition and confidence as to their ability to manage emergency situations. Simulation studies should now be carried out to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Suppan
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Michèle Chan
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
| | - Birgit Gartner
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
| | - Simon Regard
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
| | - Mathieu Campana
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ghislaine Chatellard
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Cottet
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
| | - Robert Larribau
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
| | - François Pierre Sarasin
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
| | - Marc Niquille
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (M.C.); (B.G.); (S.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (P.C.); (R.L.); (F.P.S.); (M.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sumann G, Moens D, Brink B, Brodmann Maeder M, Greene M, Jacob M, Koirala P, Zafren K, Ayala M, Musi M, Oshiro K, Sheets A, Strapazzon G, Macias D, Paal P. Multiple trauma management in mountain environments - a scoping review : Evidence based guidelines of the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine (ICAR MedCom). Intended for physicians and other advanced life support personnel. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28:117. [PMID: 33317595 PMCID: PMC7737289 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00790-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple trauma in mountain environments may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to urban environments. Objective To provide evidence based guidance to assist rescuers in multiple trauma management in mountain environments. Eligibility criteria All articles published on or before September 30th 2019, in all languages, were included. Articles were searched with predefined search terms. Sources of evidence PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and hand searching of relevant studies from the reference list of included articles. Charting methods Evidence was searched according to clinically relevant topics and PICO questions. Results Two-hundred forty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were developed and graded according to the evidence-grading system of the American College of Chest Physicians. The manuscript was initially written and discussed by the coauthors. Then it was presented to ICAR MedCom in draft and again in final form for discussion and internal peer review. Finally, in a face-to-face discussion within ICAR MedCom consensus was reached on October 11th 2019, at the ICAR fall meeting in Zakopane, Poland. Conclusions Multiple trauma management in mountain environments can be demanding. Safety of the rescuers and the victim has priority. A crABCDE approach, with haemorrhage control first, is central, followed by basic first aid, splinting, immobilisation, analgesia, and insulation. Time for on-site medical treatment must be balanced against the need for rapid transfer to a trauma centre and should be as short as possible. Reduced on-scene times may be achieved with helicopter rescue. Advanced diagnostics (e.g. ultrasound) may be used and treatment continued during transport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Sumann
- Austrian Society of Mountain and High Altitude Medicine, Emergency physician, Austrian Mountain and Helicopter Rescue, Altach, Austria
| | - D Moens
- Emergency Department Liège University Hospital, CMH HEMS Lead physician and medical director, Senior Lecturer at the University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - B Brink
- Mountain Emergency Paramedic, AHEMS, Canadian Society of Mountain Medicine, Whistler Blackcomb Ski Patrol, Whistler, Canada
| | - M Brodmann Maeder
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland and Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - M Greene
- Medical Officer Mountain Rescue England and Wales, Wales, UK
| | - M Jacob
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Hospitallers Brothers Saint-Elisabeth-Hospital Straubing, Bavarian Mountain Rescue Service, Straubing, Germany
| | - P Koirala
- Adjunct Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Mountain Medicine Society of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - K Zafren
- ICAR MedCom, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.,Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - M Ayala
- University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - M Musi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - K Oshiro
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Director of Mountain Medicine, Research, and Survey Division, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - A Sheets
- Emergency Department, Boulder Community Health, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - G Strapazzon
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.,The Corpo Nazionale Soccorso Alpino e Speleologico, National Medical School (CNSAS SNaMed), Milan, Italy
| | - D Macias
- Department of Emergency Medicine, International Mountain Medicine Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - P Paal
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. John of God Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Orso D, Vetrugno L, Federici N, D'Andrea N, Bove T. Endotracheal intubation to reduce aspiration events in acutely comatose patients: a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28:116. [PMID: 33303004 PMCID: PMC7726605 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00814-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is customary to believe that a patient with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than or equal to 8 should be intubated to avoid aspiration. We conducted a systematic review to establish if patients with GCS ≤ 8 for trauma or non-traumatic emergencies and treated in the acute care setting (e.g., Emergency Department or Pre-hospital environment) should be intubated to avoid aspiration or aspiration pneumonia/pneumonitis, and consequently, reduce mortality. Methods We searched six databases, Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, SpringerLink, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Emcare, from April 15th to October 14th, 2020, for studies involving low GCS score patients of whom the risk of aspiration and related complications was assessed. Results Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis (7 on non-traumatic population, 4 on trauma population, 1 pediatric and 1 adult mixed case studies). For the non-traumatic cases, two prospective studies and one retrospective study found no difference in aspiration risk between intubated and non-intubated patients. Two retrospective studies reported a reduction in the risk of aspiration in the intubated patient group. For traumatic cases, the study that considered the risk of aspiration did not show any differences between the two groups. A study on adult mixed cases found no difference in the incidence of aspiration among intubated and non-intubated patients. A study on pediatric patients found increased mortality for intubated versus non-intubated non-traumatic patients with a low GCS score. Conclusion Whether intubation results in a reduction in the incidence of aspiration events and whether these are more frequent in patients with low GCS scores are not yet established. The paucity of evidence on this topic makes clinical trials justifiable and necessary. Trial registration Prospero registration number: CRD42020136987. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-020-00814-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Orso
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Luigi Vetrugno
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy. .,Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, ASUFC University Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia" of Udine, Udine, Italy.
| | - Nicola Federici
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Natascia D'Andrea
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Tiziana Bove
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.,Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, ASUFC University Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia" of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gurney JM, Loos PE, Prins M, Van Wyck DW, McCafferty RR, Marion DW. The Prehospital Evaluation and Care of Moderate/Severe TBI in the Austere Environment. Mil Med 2020; 185:148-153. [PMID: 32074372 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usz361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased resource constraints secondary to a smaller medical footprint, prolonged evacuation times, or overwhelming casualty volumes all increase the challenges of effective management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the austere environment. Prehospital providers are responsible for the battlefield recognition and initial management of TBI. As such, targeted education is critical to efficient injury recognition, promoting both provider readiness and improved patient outcomes. When austere conditions limit or prevent definitive treatment, a comprehensive understanding of TBI pathophysiology can help inform acute care and enhance prevention of secondary brain injury. Field deployable, noninvasive TBI assessment and monitoring devices are urgently needed and are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Evidence shows that the assessment, monitoring, and treatment in the first few hours and days after injury should focus on the preservation of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation. For cases where medical management is inadequate (eg, evidence of an enlarging intracranial hematoma), guidelines have been developed for the performance of cranial surgery by nonneurosurgeons. TBI management in the austere environment will continue to be a challenge, but research focused on improving evidence-based monitoring and therapeutic interventions can help to mitigate some of these challenges and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Gurney
- Joint Trauma System/U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, San Antonio, TX 78234
| | - Paul E Loos
- Non-Standard Medical Detachment, Office of Strategic Warfare, 1st Special Forces Command, Fort Bragg, NC 28310
| | - Mayumi Prins
- Department of Neurosurgery, UCLA, 300 Stein Plaza Suite 532, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | | | - Randall R McCafferty
- San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234
| | - Donald W Marion
- The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center and General Dynamics Information Technology, 1335 East West Hwy, Silver Spring, MD 20910
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bossers SM, Boer C, Bloemers FW, Van Lieshout EMM, Den Hartog D, Hoogerwerf N, Innemee G, van der Naalt J, Absalom AR, Peerdeman SM, de Visser M, de Leeuw MA, Schwarte LA, Loer SA, Schober P. Epidemiology, Prehospital Characteristics and Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in The Netherlands: The BRAIN-PROTECT Study. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2020; 25:644-655. [PMID: 32960672 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1824049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A thorough understanding of the epidemiology, patient characteristics, trauma mechanisms, and current outcomes among patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is important as it may inform potential strategies to improve prehospital emergency care. The aim of this study is to describe the prehospital epidemiology, characteristics and outcome of (suspected) severe TBI in the Netherlands. METHODS The BRAIN-PROTECT study is a prospective observational study on prehospital management of patients with severe TBI in the Netherlands. The study population comprised all consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of TBI and a prehospital GCS score ≤ 8, who were managed by one of the 4 Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). Patients were followed-up in 9 trauma centers until 1 year after injury. Planned sub-analyses were performed for patients with "confirmed" and "isolated" TBI. RESULTS Data from 2,589 patients, of whom 2,117 (81.8%) were transferred to a participating trauma center, were analyzed. The incidence rate of prehospitally suspected and confirmed severe TBI were 3.2 (95% CI: 3.1;3.4) and 2.7 (95% CI: 2.5;2.8) per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Median patient age was 46 years, 58.4% were involved in traffic crashes, of which 37.4% were bicycle related. 47.6% presented with an initial GCS of 3. The median time from HEMS dispatch to hospital arrival was 54 minutes. The overall 30-day mortality was 39.0% (95% CI: 36.8;41.2). CONCLUSION This article summarizes the prehospital epidemiology, characteristics and outcome of severe TBI in the Netherlands, and highlights areas in which primary prevention and prehospital care can be improved.
Collapse
|
43
|
Bergmans SF, Schober P, Schwarte LA, Loer SA, Bossers SM. Prehospital fluid administration in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 2020; 51:2356-2367. [PMID: 32888722 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) focuses on preventing secondary brain injury. Therefore, hypotension should be prevented, or if present, should be promptly treated in order to maintain optimal cerebral perfusion pressure. Fluid resuscitation is a traditional mainstay in the prehospital treatment of hypotension, however, the choice of fluid type that is to be administered in the prehospital setting is the subject of an on-going debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore performed to assess the effect of different fluid types on outcome in patients with severe TBI. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for articles up to March 2020. Studies comparing two or more prehospital administered fluid types with suspected or confirmed severe TBI were deemed eligible for inclusion. Studied outcomes were mortality and (extended) Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The meta-analysis tested for differences in survival between hypertonic saline (HTS) and normotonic crystalloids (i.e. normal saline or Lactated Ringer's) and between hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) and normotonic crystalloids. The systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO register with number CRD42020140423. RESULTS This literature search yielded a total of 519 articles, of which 12 were included in the systematic review and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies found no statistically significant difference in survival between patients treated with different fluid types (e.g. normal saline and hypertonic saline). All studies assessing neurological outcome, measured through (extended) GOS, found no statistically significant difference between different fluid types. Meta-analysis showed no better survival for patients treated with HSD, when compared to normotonic crystalloids (overall RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.06). Moreover, HTS compared to normotonic crystalloids does not result in a better survival (overall RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival or neurological benefit for one specific fluid type administered in the prehospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Bergmans
- Department Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - P Schober
- Department Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service "Lifeliner 1", Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L A Schwarte
- Department Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service "Lifeliner 1", Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S A Loer
- Department Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S M Bossers
- Department Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Whiting MD, Dengler BA, Rodriguez CL, Blodgett D, Cohen AB, Januszkiewicz AJ, Rasmussen TE, Brody DL. Prehospital Detection of Life-Threatening Intracranial Pathology: An Unmet Need for Severe TBI in Austere, Rural, and Remote Areas. Front Neurol 2020; 11:599268. [PMID: 33193067 PMCID: PMC7662094 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.599268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries, and in austere, rural, and remote settings. The purpose of this Perspective is to challenge the notion that accurate and actionable diagnosis of the most severe brain injuries should be limited to physicians and other highly-trained specialists located at hospitals. Further, we aim to demonstrate that the great opportunity to improve severe TBI care is in the prehospital setting. Here, we discuss potential applications of prehospital diagnostics, including ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for detection of life-threatening subdural and epidural hemorrhage, as well as monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics following severe TBI. Ultrasound-based methods for assessment of cerebrovascular hemodynamics, vasospasm, and intracranial pressure have substantial promise, but have been mainly used in hospital settings; substantial development will be required for prehospital optimization. Compared to ultrasound, NIRS is better suited to assess certain aspects of intracranial pathology and has a smaller form factor. Thus, NIRS is potentially closer to becoming a reliable method for non-invasive intracranial assessment and cerebral monitoring in the prehospital setting. While one current continuous wave NIRS-based device has been FDA-approved for detection of subdural and epidural hemorrhage, NIRS methods using frequency domain technology have greater potential to improve diagnosis and monitoring in the prehospital setting. In addition to better technology, advances in large animal models, provider training, and implementation science represent opportunities to accelerate progress in prehospital care for severe TBI in austere, rural, and remote areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Whiting
- The Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.,Stephens Family Clinical Research Institute, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Bradley A Dengler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Carissa L Rodriguez
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States
| | - David Blodgett
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States
| | - Adam B Cohen
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States.,Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Todd E Rasmussen
- The Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.,Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - David L Brody
- The Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.,Department of Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.,Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Curry BW, Ward S, Lindsell CJ, Hart KW, McMullan JT. Mechanical Ventilation of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in the Prehospital Setting. Air Med J 2020; 39:410-413. [PMID: 33012481 DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2020.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Suboptimal ventilation may impact outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study compares the incidence of eucapnia between manually and mechanically ventilated patients with severe TBI during helicopter transport. METHODS This retrospective chart review included consecutive intubated adults with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 9) transported by helicopter from the scene of injury to a level 1 trauma center between 2009 and 2015. The primary outcome was the first venous partial pressure of carbon dioxide obtained in the emergency department. Hypocapnia, eucapnia, and hypercapnia were defined based on the normal range for the testing instrument. The Fisher exact test was used to compare groups. RESULTS Of 1,070 trauma patients intubated and transported, 93 met the inclusion criteria with full data. The mean age was 43 years, 81 of 93 were white, and 70 of 93 were men. The mean Injury Severity Score was 29, and 26 of 93 were mechanically ventilated. Hypocapnia occurred in 4 of 93 and hypercapnia in 56 of 93. There was no difference in the rate of eucapnia in manually ventilated compared with mechanically ventilated patients (36% vs. 35%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSION Eucapnia at emergency department arrival occurred in 36% of patients and was unaffected by whether ventilation was manually or mechanically controlled. Few patients were hypocapnic, indicating a low incidence of hyperventilation during helicopter transport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bentley Woods Curry
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
| | - Steven Ward
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Christopher J Lindsell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Kimberly W Hart
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Jason T McMullan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rakhit S, Nordness MF, Lombardo SR, Cook M, Smith L, Patel MB. Management and Challenges of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 42:127-144. [PMID: 32916746 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability in trauma patients, and can be classified into mild, moderate, and severe by the Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Prehospital, initial emergency department, and subsequent intensive care unit (ICU) management of severe TBI should focus on avoiding secondary brain injury from hypotension and hypoxia, with appropriate reversal of anticoagulation and surgical evacuation of mass lesions as indicated. Utilizing principles based on the Monro-Kellie doctrine and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), a surrogate for cerebral blood flow (CBF) should be maintained by optimizing mean arterial pressure (MAP), through fluids and vasopressors, and/or decreasing intracranial pressure (ICP), through bedside maneuvers, sedation, hyperosmolar therapy, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, and, in refractory cases, barbiturate coma or decompressive craniectomy (DC). While controversial, direct ICP monitoring, in conjunction with clinical examination and imaging as indicated, should help guide severe TBI therapy, although new modalities, such as brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) monitoring, show great promise in providing strategies to optimize CBF. Optimization of the acute care of severe TBI should include recognition and treatment of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH), early seizure prophylaxis, venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, and nutrition optimization. Despite this, severe TBI remains a devastating injury and palliative care principles should be applied early. To better affect the challenging long-term outcomes of severe TBI, more and continued high quality research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Rakhit
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Mina F Nordness
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sarah R Lombardo
- Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Madison Cook
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Laney Smith
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia
| | - Mayur B Patel
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Department of Neurosurgery and Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Surgical Service, Nashville VA Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, Tennessee.,Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center Service, Nashville VA Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ninokawa S, Friedman J, Tatum D, Smith A, Taghavi S, McGrew P, Duchesne J. Patient Contact Time and Prehospital Interventions in Hypotensive Trauma Patients: Should We Reconsider the "ABC" Algorithm When Time Is of the Essence? Am Surg 2020; 86:937-943. [PMID: 32762468 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820940244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is disagreement in the trauma community concerning the extent to which emergency medical services (EMS) should perform on-scene interventions. Additionally, in recent years the "ABC" algorithm has been questioned in hypotensive patients. The objective of this study was to quantify the delay introduced by different on-scene interventions. METHODS A retrospective analysis of hypotensive trauma patients brought to an urban level 1 trauma center by EMS from 2007 to 2018 was performed, and patients were stratified by mechanism of injury and new injury severity score (NISS). Independent samples median tests were used to compare median on-scene times. RESULTS Among 982 trauma patients, median on-scene time was 5 minutes (interquartile range 3-8). In penetrating trauma patients (n = 488) with NISS of 16-25, intubation significantly increased scene time from 4 to 6 minutes (P < .05). In penetrating trauma patients with NISS of 10-15, wound care significantly increased scene time from 3 to 6 minutes (P < .05). Tourniquet use, interosseous (IO) access, intravenous (IV) access, and needle decompression did not significantly increase scene time. CONCLUSION Understanding that intubation increases scene time in penetrating trauma, while IV and IO access do not, alterations to the traditional "ABC" algorithm may be warranted. Further investigation of prehospital interventions is needed to determine which are appropriate on-scene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Ninokawa
- 5783 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Jessica Friedman
- 5783 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Danielle Tatum
- Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Alison Smith
- 5783 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Sharven Taghavi
- 5783 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Patrick McGrew
- 5783 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Juan Duchesne
- 5783 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Physician Prehospital Care in Mexico City: Retrospective Analysis of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Severe Head Trauma. Prehosp Disaster Med 2020; 35:128-132. [PMID: 31973785 DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x20000035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Mexico, physicians have become part of public service prehospital care. Head injured patients are a sensitive group that can benefit from early advanced measures to protect the airway, with the objective to reduce hypoxia and maintain normocapnia. PROBLEM The occurrence of endotracheal intubation to patients with severe head injuries by prehospital physicians working at Mexico City's Service of Emergency Medical Care (SAMU) is unknown. METHODS A retrospective analysis of five-year data (2012-2016) from Mexico City's Medical Emergencies Regulation Center was performed. Only SAMU ambulance services were analyzed. Adult patients with a prehospital diagnosis of head injury based on mechanism of injury and physical examination with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <nine were included. RESULTS A total of 293 cases met the inclusion criteria; the mean GCS was five points. Of those, 150 (51.1%) patients were intubated. There was no difference in the occurrence of intubation among the different GCS scales, or if the patient was considered to have isolated head trauma versus polytrauma. Fifteen patients were intubated using sedation and neuromuscular blockage. Four patients were intubated with sedation alone and six patients with neuromuscular blockage alone. One patient was intubated using opioid analgesia, sedation, and neuromuscular blockage. CONCLUSIONS Patients with severe head injuries cared by prehospital physicians in Mexico City were intubated 51.1% of the time and were more likely to be intubated without the assistance of anesthetics.
Collapse
|
49
|
Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate in an Urban, Supervised, Resident-Staffed Emergency Mobile System: An 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9010238. [PMID: 31963162 PMCID: PMC7019886 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: In the prehospital setting, endotracheal intubation (ETI) is sometimes required to secure a patient’s airways. Emergency ETI in the field can be particularly challenging, and success rates differ widely depending on the provider’s training, background, and experience. Our aim was to evaluate the ETI success rate in a resident-staffed and specialist-physician-supervised emergency prehospital system. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on data extracted from the Geneva University Hospitals’ institutional database. In this city, the prehospital emergency response system has three levels of expertise: the first is an advanced life-support ambulance staffed by two paramedics, the second is a mobile unit staffed by an advanced paramedic and a resident physician, and the third is a senior emergency physician acting as a supervisor, who can be dispatched either as backup for the resident physician or when a regular Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation unit (Service Mobile d’Urgence et de Réanimation, SMUR) is not available. For this study, records of all adult patients taken care of by a second- and/or third-level prehospital medical team between 2008 and 2018 were screened for intubation attempts. The primary outcome was the success rate of the ETI attempts. The secondary outcomes were the number of ETI attempts, the rate of ETI success at the first attempt, and the rate of ETIs performed by a supervisor. Results: A total of 3275 patients were included in the study, 55.1% of whom were in cardiac arrest. The overall ETI success rate was 96.8%, with 74.4% success at the first attempt. Supervisors oversaw 1167 ETI procedures onsite (35.6%) and performed the ETI themselves in only 488 cases (14.9%). Conclusion: A resident-staffed and specialist-physician-supervised urban emergency prehospital system can reach ETI success rates similar to those reported for a specialist-staffed system.
Collapse
|
50
|
Lockey DJ, Wilson M. Early airway management of patients with severe head injury: opportunities missed? Anaesthesia 2020; 75:7-10. [PMID: 31531980 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D J Lockey
- School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.,Emergency Medical Retrieval and Transfer Service (EMRTS), UK
| | - M Wilson
- Imperial College London, UK.,Faculty of Pre-hospital Care, Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|