1
|
Franchi M, Pellegrini G, Avogaro A, Buzzetti G, Candido R, Cavaliere A, Consoli A, Marzona I, Mennini FS, Palcic S, Corrao G. Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sulfonylureas and newer diabetes drugs as second-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2024; 12:e003991. [PMID: 38802266 PMCID: PMC11131106 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness profiles of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) compared with sulfonylureas and glinides (SU). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Population-based retrospective cohort study based on linked regional healthcare utilization databases. The cohort included all residents in Lombardy aged ≥40 years, treated with metformin in 2014, who started a second-line treatment between 2015 and 2018 with SU, GLP-1-RA, SGLT2i, or DPP-4i. For each cohort member who started SU, one patient who began other second-line treatments was randomly selected and matched for sex, age, Multisource Comorbidity Score, and previous duration of metformin treatment. Cohort members were followed up until December 31, 2022. The association between second-line treatment and clinical outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and compared between newer diabetes drugs and SU. RESULTS Overall, 22 867 patients with diabetes were included in the cohort, among which 10 577, 8125, 2893 and 1272 started a second-line treatment with SU, DPP-4i, SGLT2i and GLP-1-RA, respectively. Among these, 1208 patients for each group were included in the matched cohort. As compared with SU, those treated with DPP-4i, SGLT2i and GLP-1-RA were associated to a risk reduction for hospitalization for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of 22% (95% CI 3% to 37%), 29% (95% CI 12% to 44%) and 41% (95% CI 26% to 53%), respectively. The ICER values indicated an average gain of €96.2 and €75.7 each month free from MACE for patients on DPP-4i and SGLT2i, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Newer diabetes drugs are more effective and cost-effective second-line options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes than SUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Franchi
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pellegrini
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Avogaro
- Department of Medicine, Division of Metabolic Diseases, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Candido
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- SC Patologie Diabetiche, ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Agostino Consoli
- DMSI and CAST, Università degli Studi Gabriele d'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Saverio Mennini
- Centre for Economics and International Studies-Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Palcic
- SC Farmacia Ospedaliera e Territoriale-Area Giuliana, ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giovanni Corrao
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ciardullo S, Savaré L, Rea F, Perseghin G, Corrao G. Adherence to GLP1-RA and SGLT2-I affects clinical outcomes and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2024; 40:e3791. [PMID: 38549238 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the impact of adherence to glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose transporter two inhibitors (SGLT2-I) on clinical outcomes and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS The 121,115 residents of the Lombardy Region (Italy) aged ≥40 years newly treated with metformin during 2007-2015 were followed to identify those who started therapy with GLP1-RA or SGLT2-I. Adherence to drug therapy over the first year was defined as the proportion of days covered >80%. Within each drug class, for each adherent patient, one non-adherent patient was matched for age, sex, duration, adherence to metformin treatment and propensity score. The primary clinical outcome was a composite of insulin initiation, hospitalisation for micro- and macrovascular complications and all-cause mortality after the first year of drug treatment. Costs were evaluated based on reimbursements from the national healthcare system. RESULTS After matching, 1182 pairs of adherent and non-adherent GLP1-RA users and 1126 pairs of adherent and non-adherent SGLT2-I users were included. In both groups, adherent patients experienced a significantly lower incidence of the primary outcome (HR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-0.98 for GLP1-RA and HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87 for SGLT2-I). A significant reduction in hospitalizations was found for adherent patients in the GLP1-RA group but not for the SGLT2-I group. Results were consistent when analyses were stratified by age and sex. While higher drug-related costs in the adherent group were counterbalanced by decreased hospitalisation costs in SGLT2-I treated patients, this was not the case for GLP1-RA. CONCLUSIONS Higher adherence to drug treatment with GLP1-RA and SGLT2-I during the first year of the drug intake is associated with a lower incidence of adverse clinical outcomes in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Ciardullo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Laura Savaré
- National Centre for Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, at the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- MOX - Laboratory for Modeling and Scientific Computing, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- CHDS - Center for Health data Science, Human Technopole, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- National Centre for Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, at the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Perseghin
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, at the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kurpershoek E, Visser LNC, Malekzadeh A, de Bie RMA, Dijk JM, Hillen MA. How Information Affects Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review of the Literature. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2024; 14:1115-1127. [PMID: 38995802 PMCID: PMC11380222 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-240073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Background Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) need to receive adequate information to manage their disease. However, little is known about how information provision affects patients. Objective To conduct a scoping review of the literature on the relationship between content, timing, manner of delivery, and source of PD-specific information on the one hand, and patient outcomes on the other. Methods All literature reporting about original data and published until April 2024 in peer-reviewed journals was searched in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and PsychInfo (Ovid). Subsequently, data were extracted and synthesized. Results 40 publications describing the effects of information provision or patients' evaluation thereof were retrieved. Four categories of patient outcomes were described, namely 1) evaluation and experience of information provision; 2) physical functioning; 3) psychosocial well-being; and 4) quality of life. In intervention studies, patients generally valued the provided information. Findings from cross-sectional and qualitative studies showed the importance of tailoring information to individuals' needs and capabilities. Due to variation in study designs and outcomes, no unambiguous conclusions could be drawn regarding the relationship between information and outcomes. Conclusions This scoping review identified how PD patients acquire information and revealed a lack of systematic research into the effect of information on patient outcomes. Future studies should assess 1) what information is currently provided by clinicians; 2) what additional information might be beneficial to provide; and 3) how information can be effectively aligned to benefit patients. This will eventually yield insight into how information might optimally empower PD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Kurpershoek
- Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie N C Visser
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Malekzadeh
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob M A de Bie
- Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joke M Dijk
- Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marij A Hillen
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hartmann-Nardin D, Stock S, Kalbe E, Folkerts AK. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Non-Pharmacological and Non-Surgical Interventions in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2024; 14:S241-S252. [PMID: 38339939 PMCID: PMC11380296 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-230213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Background Interest in non-pharmacological/non-surgical interventions to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) has substantially increased. Although a few health-economic studies have been conducted, summary information on the cost-effectiveness is still scarce. Objective To give an overview of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) focusing on non-pharmacological/non-surgical interventions in PD patients. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in five databases. Studies were included that provided cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) or cost-utility analysis (CUA) of non-pharmacological/non-surgical interventions in PD patients. Study quality was assessed with the Drummond and CHEERS 2022 checklists, respectively for economic evaluation. Results N = 9 studies published between 2012-2023 were identified. Most studies undertook a CUA (n = 5); n = 3 reported a combination of CEA and CUA, and n = 1 a pure CEA. Most studies (n = 6) examined physical exercise. The CEA studies identified additional costs of 170€ -660€ for the improvement of one single unit of a clinical outcome and savings of 18.40€ -22.80€ per score gained as measured with established instruments. The four studies that found significant quality of life benefits show large variations in the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3,220€ -214,226€ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY); notably interventions were heterogenous regarding content and intensity. Conclusions Despite increasing numbers of non-pharmacological/non-surgical intervention trials in PD patients, health-economic evaluations are rare. The examined intervention types and health-economic results vary greatly. Together with the heterogeneity of the health-economic studies these factors limit the conclusions that can be drawn. Further research and a standardization of methods is needed to allow decision makers to make meaningful interpretations, and to allocate scarce resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hartmann-Nardin
- Medical Psychology | Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elke Kalbe
- Medical Psychology | Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ann-Kristin Folkerts
- Medical Psychology | Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Faurie I, Harroch E, Scotto d'Apollonia C, Corte S, Arcari C, Mohara C, Barthelemy C, Fabre MH, Boussac M, Damase-Michel C, Almudever B, Croity-Belz S, Brefel-Courbon C. Impact of therapeutic education on the evolution of social representations of medication in patients with Parkinson's disease: A quantitative and qualitative study (ETPARK REMED). Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:1086-1094. [PMID: 37633737 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among the workshops of our therapeutic patient education (TPE) program, the medication workshop (TPEM workshop) is very frequently proposed to patients in view of the difficulties they encounter related to the complexity of managing antiparkinsonian treatment. Patients' appropriation of their medications could depend on their social representations. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of our TPEM workshop on the social representations PD patients have of their medications and to compare it with that of another therapeutic intervention such as a talking group defined as the control group. METHODS This single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study investigated the social representations of medication through a questionnaire on knowledge about antiparkinsonian medications, a questionnaire on beliefs about medication (BMQ), and a word association task. RESULTS In the TPEM group (n=16), the workshop induced significant effects over time on the knowledge questionnaire (P=0.01), BMQ specific necessity and concerns scores (P=0.04 and 0.01, respectively), necessity-concerns differential (P=0.04), and BMQ general harm (P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the talking group (n=6). Comparison of the two groups showed a significant difference of the BMQ general harm with a decrease in belief in the harmfulness of the medications in the workshop group (P=0.03). The results of the verbal association task showed a modification in the content and structure of the social representations of medication in the TPEM group. DISCUSSION The TPEM workshop helped reduce initial negative aspects of medication representations. Improved knowledge of their medication allowed patients to feel more competent and legitimate in communicating with caregivers, modifying their beliefs about medications. Indeed, the medication was perceived as less restrictive, care becoming central as shown by the emergence of the medical team in the social representations of the medication. CONCLUSION All the results show a specific beneficial effect of the TPEM workshop through an evolution of the social representations of medications, which became more positive in our PD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Faurie
- Laboratoire Psychologie de la Socialisation - Développement et Travail, Maison de la Recherche, Université Toulouse - Jean-Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - E Harroch
- Centre Expert Parkinson, Neurosciences Department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - C Scotto d'Apollonia
- Centre Expert Parkinson, Neurosciences Department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - S Corte
- Laboratoire Psychologie de la Socialisation - Développement et Travail, Maison de la Recherche, Université Toulouse - Jean-Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - C Arcari
- Centre Expert Parkinson, Neurosciences Department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - C Mohara
- Centre Expert Parkinson, Neurosciences Department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - C Barthelemy
- Centre Expert Parkinson, Neurosciences Department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - M H Fabre
- Centre Expert Parkinson, Neurosciences Department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - M Boussac
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - C Damase-Michel
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medicine Faculty of Purpan, 37, allées Jules-Guesde, 31073 Toulouse cedex, France
| | - B Almudever
- Laboratoire Psychologie de la Socialisation - Développement et Travail, Maison de la Recherche, Université Toulouse - Jean-Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - S Croity-Belz
- Laboratoire Psychologie de la Socialisation - Développement et Travail, Maison de la Recherche, Université Toulouse - Jean-Jaurès, 31058 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - C Brefel-Courbon
- Centre Expert Parkinson, Neurosciences Department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France; Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medicine Faculty of Purpan, 37, allées Jules-Guesde, 31073 Toulouse cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Corrao G, Franchi M, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, de Marinis F, Spaggiari L, Orecchia R, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Upfront Advanced Radiotherapy and New Drugs for NSCLC Patients with Synchronous Brain Metastases: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? A Real-World Analysis from Lombardy, Italy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041103. [PMID: 36831447 PMCID: PMC9953825 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Healthcare administrative databases represent a valuable source for real-life data analysis. The primary aim of this study is to compare effectiveness and cost profile in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring synchronous brain metastases (BMs) who received non-chemo first-line systemic therapy with or without advanced radiotherapy (aRT). METHODS Diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes were used for identifying all patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer between 2012 and 2019. Among these, patients who had started a first-line systemic treatment with either TKIs or pembrolizumab, alone or in combination with intensity-modulated or stereotactic RT, were selected. Clinical outcomes investigated included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The cost outcome was defined as the average per capita cumulative healthcare direct costs of the treatment, including all inpatient and outpatient costs. RESULTS The final cohort included 177 patients, of whom 58 were treated with systemic treatment plus aRT (STRT) and 119 with systemic treatment alone. The addition of aRT to systemic treatment was associated with a significantly better OS (p = 0.020) and PFS (p = 0.041) than systemic therapy alone. The ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) value indicated an average cost of €3792 for each month of survival after STRT treatment and confirmed clinical effectiveness but higher healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS This real-world study suggests that upfront aRT for NCLSC patients with synchronous BMs represents a valid treatment strategy, boosting the efficacy of novel and emerging drug classes with sustainable costs for the health service. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE The present real-world study reports that the use of upfront advanced radiotherapyaRT and new-generation systemic agents, such as TKIs and pembrolizumab, may have higher oncological control and an improved cost-effectiveness profile than the use of new-generation systemic agents alone in NCLSC patients with synchronous brain metastases. Acquired evidence can also be used to inform policymakers that adding advanced radiotherapy results is a sustainable cost for the health service. Since approximately 50% of patients do not meet RCT inclusion criteria, a significant proportion of them is receiving treatment that is not evidence-informed; therefore, these results warrant further studies to identify the best radiotherapy timing and possible dose escalation approaches to improving treatment efficacy in patient subgroups not typically represented in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Franchi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
De Pandis MF, Torti M, Rotondo R, Iodice L, Levi Della Vida M, Casali M, Vacca L, Viselli F, Servodidio V, Proietti S, Stocchi F. Therapeutic education for empowerment and engagement in patients with Parkinson's disease: A non-pharmacological, interventional, multicentric, randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1167685. [PMID: 37144003 PMCID: PMC10151770 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1167685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In 1997 the European Parkinson's Disease Associations launched the Charter for People with Parkinson's disease that stated the right of patients to be informed and trained on the disease, its course, and treatments available. To date, few data analyzed the effectiveness of education program on motor and non-motor symptoms of PD. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an education program as it was a pharmacological treatment, thus choosing as the primary endpoint the change in daily OFF hours, the most widely used outcome in pharmaceutical clinical trials on PD patients with motor fluctuations. Secondary outcomes were change in motor and non-motor symptoms, quality of life and social functioning. The long-term efficacy of the education therapy was also evaluated by analyzing data collected at 12- and 24-weeks follow-up outpatient visits. Methods One hundred and twenty advanced patients and their caregivers were assigned to the intervention or control group in a single-blind, multicentric, prospective, randomized study evaluating an education program structured in individual and group sessions over a 6-weeks period.At the end of study, the intervention group showed a significant reduction in daily OFF hours compared to control patients (-1.07 ± 0.78 vs. 0.09 ± 0.35, p < 0.0001) and a significant improvement was also reported in most secondary outcomes. Patients retained significant medication adherence and daily OFF hours reduction at 12- and 24-weeks follow-up. Conclusion The results obtained demonstrated that education programs may translate in a notable improvement in motor fluctuations and non-motor symptoms in advanced PD patients.Clinical Trial Registration:Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04378127.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lanfranco Iodice
- Health Management, University Hospital “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- Italian Health Ministry c/o USMAF Campania, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fabrizio Stocchi
- IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy
- San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Profile of Second-Line Treatments with Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15040489. [PMID: 35455486 PMCID: PMC9025730 DOI: 10.3390/ph15040489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
No evidence is available on the head-to-head comparison of clinical outcomes of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness profile of nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab. We used a population-based retrospective cohort study based on the healthcare utilization databases of the Lombardy Region, Italy. The study cohort included all patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer, who started a second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab from 2015 to 30 June 2020. Overall survival and average cumulative healthcare costs were measured from the start of second-line treatment until 31 December 2020. The study cohort included 1607 patients who started a second-line treatment with ICIs, of which there were 1193 with nivolumab, 138 with pembrolizumab and 276 with atezolizumab. No differences were observed between treatment arms in terms of sex, age or comorbidities. Median OS was very similar between groups, being 8.9, 9.4 and 8.7 months, respectively, in patients treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab (p = 0.898). The adjusted hazard ratio of death of patients treated with pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, as compared to nivolumab, were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.81 to 1.25) and 1.03 (0.88 to 1.21), respectively. Healthcare cumulative costs measured in the first two years of follow-up were EUR 43,764, 46,233 and 34,116, on average, associated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, respectively. In our real-world study, atezolizumab was the ICI associated with the most favorable cost-effectiveness profile.
Collapse
|
9
|
Corrao G, Rea F, Mancia G, Perseghin G, Merlino L, Martini N, Carbone S, Carle F. Cost-effectiveness of the adherence with recommendations for clinical monitoring of patients with diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 31:3111-3121. [PMID: 34531108 DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS To validate a set of indicators for monitoring the quality of care of patients with diabetes in 'real-life' practice through its relationship with measurable clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. METHODS AND RESULTS A population-based cohort study was carried out by including the 20,635 patients, residents in the Lombardy Region (Italy), who in the year 2012 were newly taken-in-care for diabetes. Adherence with clinical recommendations (i.e., controls for glycated haemoglobin, lipid profile, urine albumin excretion and serum creatinine) was recorded during the first year after the patient was taken-in-care, and categorized according whether he/she complied with none or almost none (0 or 1), just some (2) or all or almost all (3 or 4) the recommendations, respectively denoted as poor, intermediate and high adherence. Short- and long-term complications of diabetes, and healthcare cost incurred by the National Health Service, were assessed during follow-up. Compared with patients with poor adherence, those with intermediate and high adherence respectively showed (i) a delay in outcome occurrence of 13 days (95% CI, -2 to 27) and 23 days (9-38), and (ii) a lower healthcare cost of 54 € and 77 €. In average, a gain of 18 Euros and 15 Euros for each day free from diabetic complication by increasing adherence respectively from poor to intermediate and from poor to high were observed. CONCLUSION Close control of patients with diabetes through regular clinical examinations must be considered the cornerstone of national guidance, national audits, and quality improvement incentive schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Gianluca Perseghin
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Luca Merlino
- Epidemiologic Observatory, Lombardy Region Welfare Department, Milan, Italy
| | - Nello Martini
- Research and Health Foundation (Fondazione ReS -Ricerca e Salute-), Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Carbone
- Department of Health Planning, Italian Health Ministry, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Carle
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Center of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Factors that predict a change in quality of life among Parkinson's disease patients participating in a patient education program. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2021; 177:1151-1159. [PMID: 34183162 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient education is essential in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is not known which aspects of patient education are associated with an improvement in quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVE To identify factors that predicted an improvement in QoL in PD patients that participate in an education program. METHODS EduPark is a community-hospital patient education program. PD Patients that had participated in the program between September 2013 and March 2017 were retrospectively included. QoL was prospectively evaluated (using the PDQ-8 questionnaire) before and after the patient's participation. We used mixed linear models (adjusted for the initial value of the PDQ-8) to determine socio-demographic and clinical variables that predicted the change in the PDQ-8 score. RESULTS A total of 181 patients were included (mean±standard deviation age: 62.9±8.2 years; disease duration: 9.1±5.3 years). 76.7% of the 103 patients having undergone a cognitive evaluation did not display cognitive impairment. We did not identify any factors that predicted the program's impact on the patient's QoL. Participation in the program was associated with a significant decrease (improvement) in the PDQ-8 score (39.4±17.81 before and 35.6±15.9 afterwards, P<0.001). CONCLUSION We did not identify any factors that were predictive of the patient education program's impact on QoL in patients with PD. Participation in the program was associated with a significant improvement in QoL. Our results suggest that Patient Education Programs should be more widely prescribed and developed in the management of PD.
Collapse
|
11
|
Franchi M, Vener C, Garau D, Kirchmayer U, Di Martino M, Romero M, De Carlo I, Scondotto S, Stival C, Della Porta MG, Passamonti F, Corrao G. Bortezomib-based therapy in non-transplant multiple myeloma patients: a retrospective cohort study from the FABIO project. Ther Adv Hematol 2021; 12:2040620721996488. [PMID: 33747423 PMCID: PMC7905486 DOI: 10.1177/2040620721996488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Randomized clinical trials showed that bortezomib, in addition to
conventional chemotherapy, improves survival and disease progression in
multiple myeloma (MM) patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation.
The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is the
evaluation of both clinical and economic profile of bortezomib-based
versus conventional chemotherapy in daily clinical
practice. Methods: Healthcare utilization databases of six Italian regions were used to identify
adult patients with non-transplant MM, who started a first-line therapy with
bortezomib-based or conventional chemotherapy. Patients were matched by
propensity score and were followed from treatment start until death, lost to
follow-up or study end-point. Overall survival (OS) and restricted mean
survival time (RMST) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.
Association between first-line treatment and risk of death was estimated by
a conditional Cox proportional regression model. Average mean cumulative
costs were estimated and compared between groups. Results: In the period 2010–2016, 3509 non-transplant MM patients met the inclusion
criteria, of which 1157 treated with bortezomib-based therapy were matched
to 1826 treated with conventional chemotherapy. Median OS and RMST were 33.9
and 27.9 months, and 42.9 and 38.4 months, respectively, in the two
treatment arms. Overall, these values corresponded to a HR of death of 0.79
(95% CI 0.71–0.89) over a time horizon of 84 months. Average cumulative cost
were 83,839 € and 54,499 €, respectively, corresponding to an incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio of 54,333 € per year of life gained, a cost
coherent with the willingness-to-pay thresholds frequently adopted from
Western countries. Conclusions: These data suggested that, in a large cohort of non-transplant MM patients
treated outside the experimental setting, first-line treatment with
bortezomib-based therapy was associated with a favourable effectiveness and
cost-effectiveness profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Franchi
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Building U7, Via Bicocca degli Arcimboldi 8, Milan, 20126, Italy
| | - Claudia Vener
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ursula Kirchmayer
- Department of Epidemiology ASL Roma 1, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Mirko Di Martino
- Department of Epidemiology ASL Roma 1, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Marilena Romero
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences - Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Chieti, Italy
| | - Ilenia De Carlo
- Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Regional Health Authority, Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Scondotto
- Department of Health Services and Epidemiological Observatory, Regional Health Authority, Palermo, Sicily Region, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Stival
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, ItalyLaboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Matteo Giovanni Della Porta
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Passamonti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo of Varese, Varese, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Franchi M, Tritto R, Torroni L, Reno C, La Vecchia C, Corrao G. Effectiveness and Healthcare Cost of Adding Trastuzumab to Standard Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061691. [PMID: 32630517 PMCID: PMC7352495 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A randomized clinical trial showed that trastuzumab, added to traditional chemotherapy, significantly improved overall survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing metastatic gastric cancer patients. This population-based study aimed at evaluating both the clinical and economic impact of trastuzumab in a real-world setting. By using the healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy, Italy, a cohort of patients newly diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer during the period 2011–2016 was selected. Among these, patients initially treated with either trastuzumab-based chemotherapy or standard chemotherapy alone were followed up until death, migration in other regions or June 2018. Overall survival and average cumulative costs were estimated and compared between the two treatment arms. Among the 1198 metastatic gastric cancer patients who started therapy within six months after metastasis detection, 87 were initially treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy and 1111 with standard chemotherapy. Median overall survival and restricted mean survival were 10.2 and 7.4 months, and 14.9 and 11.4 months, respectively, in the two treatment arms. The adjusted hazard ratio of death was 0.73 (95% CI 0.57–0.93). The average per capita cumulative healthcare costs were, respectively, EUR 39,337 and 26,504, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 43,998 for each year of survival gained. Our study shows that adding trastuzumab to conventional chemotherapy is effective and cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Franchi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.T.); (G.C.)
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-6448-5859
| | - Roberta Tritto
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.T.); (G.C.)
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorena Torroni
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Università degli studi di Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Chiara Reno
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.T.); (G.C.)
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Effectiveness and Costs Associated to Adding Cetuximab or Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results from the Observational FABIO Project. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12040839. [PMID: 32244478 PMCID: PMC7226266 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence available on the effectiveness and costs of biological therapies for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is scarce and contrasting. We conducted a population-based cohort investigation for assessing overall survival and costs associated with their use in a real-world setting. Healthcare utilization databases were used to select patients newly diagnosed with mCRC between 2010 and 2016. Those initially treated with biological therapy (bevacizumab or cetuximab) added to chemotherapy were propensity-score-matched to those treated with standard chemotherapy alone, and were followed up to June 30th, 2018. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, restricted mean survival time (RMST) and cumulative costs were compared between the two treatment arms. The study cohort included 1896 mCRC patients treated with biological therapy matched to 5678 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was 21.8 and 20.2 months, respectively. After 84 months of follow-up, RMSTs were 30.9 and 31.9 months (p = 0.193), indicating no differences between the average survival time between treatment arms. Patients treated with biological therapy were associated with higher costs. Cumulative per capita costs were €59,663 and €44,399, respectively. In our study, first-line biological therapy did not improve long-term overall survival and was associated with higher costs as compared to standard chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Spindola B, Leite MA, Orsini M, Fonoff E, Landeiro JA, Pessoa BL. Ablative surgery for Parkinson’s disease: Is there still a role for pallidotomy in the deep brain stimulation era? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017; 158:33-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 02/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
15
|
Dupouy J, Ory-Magne F, Brefel-Courbon C. [Other care in Parkinson's disease: Psychological, rehabilitation, therapeutic education and new technologies]. Presse Med 2017; 46:225-232. [PMID: 28040344 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) is often traumatic. It is then important to organize this announcement in order to support the patient in this major step of his care course. Anxiety and depression are present in about 50% of PD patients. Besides pharmacological treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy induces improvement in anxio-depressive symptoms. We have to promote physical activity for PD patients, from the beginning of the disease, because it prevents from deconditioning, improves motor and non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and decreases loneliness. Rehabilitation may be also proposed (physiotherapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy). But there is no specific recommendation in PD, and usual activities can be proposed. Therapeutic education is an answer for PD patients who need to know and understand their disease and treatment. Organization of therapeutic education is different depending of the teams: group workshop and/or individual sessions, conduct by doctors or paramedical staff (nurse, physiotherapist, psychologist…). Therapeutic education programs are always evolving. It will soon be proposed therapeutic education for care partners, and some patients may join therapeutic education staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Dupouy
- CHU de Toulouse, centre expert Parkinson, service de neurologie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Fabienne Ory-Magne
- CHU de Toulouse, centre expert Parkinson, service de neurologie, 31059 Toulouse, France; UMR 1214, Inserm, imagerie cérébrale et handicaps neurologiques, Toulouse, France
| | - Christine Brefel-Courbon
- CHU de Toulouse, centre expert Parkinson, service de neurologie, 31059 Toulouse, France; UMR 1214, Inserm, imagerie cérébrale et handicaps neurologiques, Toulouse, France; CHU de Toulouse, service de pharmacologie clinique, 31000 Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|