1
|
Mitchell JD, Drymon JM, Vardon J, Coulson PG, Simpfendorfer CA, Scyphers SB, Kajiura SM, Hoel K, Williams S, Ryan KL, Barnett A, Heupel MR, Chin A, Navarro M, Langlois T, Ajemian MJ, Gilman E, Prasky E, Jackson G. Shark depredation: future directions in research and management. REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES 2023; 33:475-499. [PMID: 36404946 PMCID: PMC9664043 DOI: 10.1007/s11160-022-09732-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Shark depredation is a complex social-ecological issue that affects a range of fisheries worldwide. Increasing concern about the impacts of shark depredation, and how it intersects with the broader context of fisheries management, has driven recent research in this area, especially in Australia and the United States. This review synthesises these recent advances and provides strategic guidance for researchers aiming to characterise the occurrence of depredation, identify the shark species responsible, and test deterrent and management approaches to reduce its impacts. Specifically, the review covers the application of social science approaches, as well as advances in video camera and genetic methods for identifying depredating species. The practicalities and considerations for testing magnetic, electrical, and acoustic deterrent devices are discussed in light of recent research. Key concepts for the management of shark depredation are reviewed, with recommendations made to guide future research and policy development. Specific management responses to address shark depredation are lacking, and this review emphasizes that a "silver bullet" approach for mitigating depredation does not yet exist. Rather, future efforts to manage shark depredation must rely on a diverse range of integrated approaches involving those in the fishery (fishers, scientists and fishery managers), social scientists, educators, and other stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. D. Mitchell
- Queensland Government, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102 Australia
| | - J. M. Drymon
- Mississippi State University, Coastal Research and Extension Center, 1815 Popps Ferry Road, Biloxi, MS 39532 USA
- Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, 703 East Beach Drive, Ocean Springs, MS 39564 USA
| | - J. Vardon
- Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW Australia
| | - P. G. Coulson
- Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, 39 Northside Drive, Hillarys, WA 6025 Australia
| | - C. A. Simpfendorfer
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia
| | - S. B. Scyphers
- Coastal Sustainability Institute, Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA 01908 USA
- Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - S. M. Kajiura
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
| | - K. Hoel
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Bldg 34 James Cook Drive, Douglas, QLD 4811 Australia
| | - S. Williams
- Queensland Government, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102 Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072 Australia
| | - K. L. Ryan
- Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, 39 Northside Drive, Hillarys, WA 6025 Australia
| | - A. Barnett
- Biopixel Oceans Foundation, Cairns, QLD Australia
- Marine Data Technology Hub, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811 Australia
| | - M. R. Heupel
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia
| | - A. Chin
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Bldg 34 James Cook Drive, Douglas, QLD 4811 Australia
| | - M. Navarro
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA Australia
- The Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA Australia
| | - T. Langlois
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA Australia
- The Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA Australia
| | - M. J. Ajemian
- Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, 5600 US 1 North, Fort Pierce, FL 34946 USA
| | - E. Gilman
- Pelagic Ecosystems Research Group, Honolulu, HI USA
- Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - E. Prasky
- Coastal Sustainability Institute, Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA 01908 USA
- Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - G. Jackson
- Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, 39 Northside Drive, Hillarys, WA 6025 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Proctor MF, Garshelis DL, Thatte P, Steinmetz R, Crudge B, McLellan BN, McShea WJ, Ngoprasert D, Nawaz MA, Te Wong S, Sharma S, Fuller AK, Dharaiya N, Pigeon KE, Fredriksson G, Wang D, Li S, Hwang MH. Review of field methods for monitoring Asian bears. Glob Ecol Conserv 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
3
|
Hoban S, Archer FI, Bertola LD, Bragg JG, Breed MF, Bruford MW, Coleman MA, Ekblom R, Funk WC, Grueber CE, Hand BK, Jaffé R, Jensen E, Johnson JS, Kershaw F, Liggins L, MacDonald AJ, Mergeay J, Miller JM, Muller-Karger F, O'Brien D, Paz-Vinas I, Potter KM, Razgour O, Vernesi C, Hunter ME. Global genetic diversity status and trends: towards a suite of Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for genetic composition. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2022; 97:1511-1538. [PMID: 35415952 PMCID: PMC9545166 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Biodiversity underlies ecosystem resilience, ecosystem function, sustainable economies, and human well‐being. Understanding how biodiversity sustains ecosystems under anthropogenic stressors and global environmental change will require new ways of deriving and applying biodiversity data. A major challenge is that biodiversity data and knowledge are scattered, biased, collected with numerous methods, and stored in inconsistent ways. The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) has developed the Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) as fundamental metrics to help aggregate, harmonize, and interpret biodiversity observation data from diverse sources. Mapping and analyzing EBVs can help to evaluate how aspects of biodiversity are distributed geographically and how they change over time. EBVs are also intended to serve as inputs and validation to forecast the status and trends of biodiversity, and to support policy and decision making. Here, we assess the feasibility of implementing Genetic Composition EBVs (Genetic EBVs), which are metrics of within‐species genetic variation. We review and bring together numerous areas of the field of genetics and evaluate how each contributes to global and regional genetic biodiversity monitoring with respect to theory, sampling logistics, metadata, archiving, data aggregation, modeling, and technological advances. We propose four Genetic EBVs: (i) Genetic Diversity; (ii) Genetic Differentiation; (iii) Inbreeding; and (iv) Effective Population Size (Ne). We rank Genetic EBVs according to their relevance, sensitivity to change, generalizability, scalability, feasibility and data availability. We outline the workflow for generating genetic data underlying the Genetic EBVs, and review advances and needs in archiving genetic composition data and metadata. We discuss how Genetic EBVs can be operationalized by visualizing EBVs in space and time across species and by forecasting Genetic EBVs beyond current observations using various modeling approaches. Our review then explores challenges of aggregation, standardization, and costs of operationalizing the Genetic EBVs, as well as future directions and opportunities to maximize their uptake globally in research and policy. The collection, annotation, and availability of genetic data has made major advances in the past decade, each of which contributes to the practical and standardized framework for large‐scale genetic observation reporting. Rapid advances in DNA sequencing technology present new opportunities, but also challenges for operationalizing Genetic EBVs for biodiversity monitoring regionally and globally. With these advances, genetic composition monitoring is starting to be integrated into global conservation policy, which can help support the foundation of all biodiversity and species' long‐term persistence in the face of environmental change. We conclude with a summary of concrete steps for researchers and policy makers for advancing operationalization of Genetic EBVs. The technical and analytical foundations of Genetic EBVs are well developed, and conservation practitioners should anticipate their increasing application as efforts emerge to scale up genetic biodiversity monitoring regionally and globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Hoban
- Center for Tree Science, The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Rt 53, Lisle, IL, 60532, USA
| | - Frederick I Archer
- Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA/NMFS, 8901 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Laura D Bertola
- City College of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA
| | - Jason G Bragg
- Research Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Australian Institute of Botanical Science, The Royal Botanic Garden Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia
| | - Martin F Breed
- College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, University Drive, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Michael W Bruford
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, Wales, UK
| | - Melinda A Coleman
- Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales Fisheries, National Marine Science Centre, 2 Bay Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia
| | - Robert Ekblom
- Wildlife Analysis Unit, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Blekholmsterrassen 36, Stockholm, SE-106 48, Sweden
| | - W Chris Funk
- Department of Biology, Graduate Degree in Ecology, Colorado State University, 1878 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1878, USA
| | - Catherine E Grueber
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Carslaw Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Brian K Hand
- Flathead Lake Biological Station, 32125 Bio Station Ln, Polson, MT, 59860, USA
| | - Rodolfo Jaffé
- Exponent, 15375 SE 30th Place, Suite 250, Bellevue, WA, 98007, USA
| | - Evelyn Jensen
- School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Agriculture Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Jeremy S Johnson
- Department of Environmental Studies, Prescott College, 220 Grove Avenue, Prescott, AZ, 86303, USA
| | - Francine Kershaw
- Natural Resources Defense Council, 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY, 10011, USA
| | - Libby Liggins
- School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Ōtehā Rohe campus, Gate 4 Albany Highway, Auckland, Aotearoa, 0745, New Zealand
| | - Anna J MacDonald
- Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Joachim Mergeay
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Gaverstraat 4, 9500, Geraardsbergen, Belgium.,Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, KULeuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, box 2439, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joshua M Miller
- Department of Biological Sciences, MacEwan University, 10700 104 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5J 4S2, Canada
| | - Frank Muller-Karger
- College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, 140 7th Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, Florida, 33701, USA
| | - David O'Brien
- NatureScot, Great Glen House, Leachkin Road, Inverness, IV3 8NW, UK
| | - Ivan Paz-Vinas
- Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, UPS, UMR-5174 EDB, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse, 31062, France
| | - Kevin M Potter
- Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 3041 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Orly Razgour
- Biosciences, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX4 4PS, UK
| | - Cristiano Vernesi
- Forest Ecology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre- Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach, 1, San Michele all'Adige, 38010, (TN), Italy
| | - Margaret E Hunter
- U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 7920 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL, 32653, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schultz AJ, Strickland K, Cristescu RH, Hanger J, de Villiers D, Frère CH. Testing the effectiveness of genetic monitoring using genetic non-invasive sampling. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e8459. [PMID: 35127011 PMCID: PMC8794716 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Effective conservation requires accurate data on population genetic diversity, inbreeding, and genetic structure. Increasingly, scientists are adopting genetic non-invasive sampling (gNIS) as a cost-effective population-wide genetic monitoring approach. gNIS has, however, known limitations which may impact the accuracy of downstream genetic analyses. Here, using high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from blood/tissue sampling of a free-ranging koala population (n = 430), we investigated how the reduced SNP panel size and call rate typical of genetic non-invasive samples (derived from experimental and field trials) impacts the accuracy of genetic measures, and also the effect of sampling intensity on these measures. We found that gNIS at small sample sizes (14% of population) can provide accurate population diversity measures, but slightly underestimated population inbreeding coefficients. Accurate measures of internal relatedness required at least 33% of the population to be sampled. Accurate geographic and genetic spatial autocorrelation analysis requires between 28% and 51% of the population to be sampled. We show that gNIS at low sample sizes can provide a powerful tool to aid conservation decision-making and provide recommendations for researchers looking to apply these techniques to free-ranging systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony James Schultz
- Global Change Ecology Research GroupUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQldAustralia
- Icelandic Museum of Natural History (Náttúruminjasafn Íslands)ReykjavikIceland
| | - Kasha Strickland
- Global Change Ecology Research GroupUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQldAustralia
- Department of Aquaculture and Fish BiologyHólar UniversityHólarIceland
| | - Romane H. Cristescu
- Global Change Ecology Research GroupUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQldAustralia
| | | | | | - Céline H. Frère
- Global Change Ecology Research GroupUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQldAustralia
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaQldAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Considerations for Initiating a Wildlife Genomics Research Project in South and South-East Asia. J Indian Inst Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s41745-021-00243-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
6
|
Forensic genetic identification of sharks involved in human attacks. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2021; 54:102558. [PMID: 34217058 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Each year, 75-100 unprovoked shark attacks on humans are recorded, most of them resulting in no or minor injuries, while a few are fatal. Often, shark identification responsible for attacks relies on visual observations or bite wound characteristics, which limits species determination and preclude individual identification. Here, we provide two genetic approaches to reliably identify species and/or individuals involved in shark attacks on humans based on a non-invasive DNA sampling (i.e. DNA traces present on bite wounds on victims), depending on the knowledge of previous attack history at the site. The first approach uses barcoding techniques allowing species identification without any a priori, while the second relies on microsatellite genotyping, allowing species identification confirmation and individual identification, but requiring an a priori of the potential species involved in the attack. Both approaches were validated by investigating two shark attacks that occurred in Reunion Island (southwestern Indian Ocean). According to both methods, each incident was attributed to a bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas), in agreement with suggestions derived from bite wound characteristics. Both approaches appear thus suitable for the reliable identification of species involved in shark attacks on humans. Moreover, microsatellite genotyping reveals, in the studied cases, that two distinct individuals were responsible of the bites. Applying these genetic identification methods will resolve ambiguities on shark species involved in attacks and allow the collection of individual data to better understand and mitigate shark risk.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rößler DC, Lötters S, Veith M, Fugmann M, Peters C, Künzel S, Krehenwinkel H. An amplicon sequencing protocol for attacker identification from DNA traces left on artificial prey. Methods Ecol Evol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela C. Rößler
- FAS Center for Systems Biology Harvard University Cambridge MA USA
- Department of Biogeography Trier University Trier Germany
| | - Stefan Lötters
- Department of Biogeography Trier University Trier Germany
| | - Michael Veith
- Department of Biogeography Trier University Trier Germany
| | | | | | - Sven Künzel
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology Plön Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eriksson CE, Ruprecht J, Levi T. More affordable and effective noninvasive single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using high‐throughput amplicon sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour 2020; 20:1505-1516. [DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joel Ruprecht
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis OR USA
| | - Taal Levi
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis OR USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zemanova MA. Towards more compassionate wildlife research through the 3Rs principles: moving from invasive to non-invasive methods. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam A. Zemanova
- M. A. Zemanova (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-3388) ✉ , Dept of Philosophy, Univ. of Basel, Steinengraben 5, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Piaggio AJ, Shriner SA, Young JK, Griffin DL, Callahan P, Wostenberg DJ, Gese EM, Hopken MW. DNA persistence in predator saliva from multiple species and methods for optimal recovery from depredated carcasses. J Mammal 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyz156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractMolecular forensics is an important component of wildlife research and management. Using DNA from noninvasive samples collected at predation sites, we can identify predator species and obtain individual genotypes, improving our understanding of predator–prey dynamics and impacts of predators on livestock and endangered species. To improve sample collection strategies, we tested two sample collection methods and estimated degradation rates of predator DNA on the carcasses of multiple prey species. We fed carcasses of calves (Bos taurus) and lambs (Ovis aires) to three captive predator species: wolves (Canis lupus), coyotes (C. latrans), and mountain lions (Puma concolor). We swabbed the carcass in the field, as well as removed a piece of hide from the carcasses and then swabbed it in the laboratory. We swabbed all tissue samples through time and attempted to identify the predator involved in the depredation using salivary DNA. We found the most successful approach for yielding viable salivary DNA was removing hide from the prey and swabbing it in the laboratory. As expected, genotyping error increased through time and our ability to obtain complete genotypes decreased over time, the latter falling below 50% after 24 h. We provide guidelines for sampling salivary DNA from tissues of depredated carcasses for maximum probability of detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette J Piaggio
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Susan A Shriner
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Julie K Young
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center-Predator Research Facility, Utah State University, Logan, UT,USA
| | - Doreen L Griffin
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | | | - Darren J Wostenberg
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Eric M Gese
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center-Predator Research Facility, Utah State University, Logan, UT,USA
| | - Matthew W Hopken
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nichols RV, Curd E, Heintzman PD, Shapiro B. Targeted Amplification and Sequencing of Ancient Environmental and Sedimentary DNA. Methods Mol Biol 2019; 1963:149-161. [PMID: 30875053 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9176-1_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
All organisms release their DNA into the environment through processes such as excretion and the senescence of tissues and limbs. This DNA, often referred to as environmental DNA (eDNA) or sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA), can be recovered from both present-day and ancient soils, fecal samples, bodies of water and lake cores, and even air. While eDNA is a potentially useful record of past and present biodiversity, several challenges complicate data generation and interpretation of results. Most importantly, eDNA samples tend to be highly taxonomically mixed, and the target organism or group of organisms may be present at very low abundance within this mixture. To overcome this challenge, enrichment approaches are often used to target specific taxa of interest. Here, we describe a protocol to amplify metabarcodes or short, variable loci that identify lineages within broad taxonomic groups (e.g., plants, mammals), using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with established generic "barcode" primers. We also provide a catalog of animal and plant barcode primers that, because they target relatively short fragments of DNA, are potentially suitable for use with degraded DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth V Nichols
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Emily Curd
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter D Heintzman
- Tromsø University Museum, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Beth Shapiro
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Monge O, Dumas D, Baus I. Environmental DNA from avian residual saliva in fruits and its potential uses in population genetics. CONSERV GENET RESOUR 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s12686-018-1074-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
13
|
How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys. Sci Rep 2018; 8:13830. [PMID: 30218000 PMCID: PMC6138736 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32244-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Detection dogs, specially trained domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), have become a valuable, noninvasive, conservation tool because they remove the dependence of attracting species to a particular location. Further, detection dogs locate samples independent of appearance, composition, or visibility allowing researchers to collect large sets of unbiased samples that can be used in complex ecological queries. One question not fully addressed is why samples from nontarget species are inadvertently collected during detection dog surveys. While a common explanation has been incomplete handler or dog training, our study aimed to explore alternative explanations. Our trials demonstrate that a scat’s genetic profile can be altered by interactions of nontarget species with target scat via urine-marking, coprophagy, and moving scats with their mouths, all pathways to contamination by nontarget species’ DNA. Because detection dogs are trained to locate odor independent of masking, the collection of samples with a mixed olfactory profile (target and nontarget) is possible. These scats will likely have characteristics of target species’ scats and are therefore only discovered faulty once genetic results indicate a nontarget species. While the collection of nontarget scats will not impact research conclusions so long as samples are DNA tested, we suggest ways to minimize their collection and associated costs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wirsing AJ, Quinn TP, Cunningham CJ, Adams JR, Craig AD, Waits LP. Alaskan brown bears ( Ursus arctos) aggregate and display fidelity to foraging neighborhoods while preying on Pacific salmon along small streams. Ecol Evol 2018; 8:9048-9061. [PMID: 30271565 PMCID: PMC6157690 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The interaction between brown bears (Ursus arctos) and Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) is important to the population dynamics of both species and a celebrated example of consumer-mediated nutrient transport. Yet, much of the site-specific information we have about the bears in this relationship comes from observations at a few highly visible but unrepresentative locations and a small number of radio-telemetry studies. Consequently, our understanding of brown bear abundance and behavior at more cryptic locations where they commonly feed on salmon, including small spawning streams, remains limited. We employed a noninvasive genetic approach (barbed wire hair snares) over four summers (2012-2015) to document patterns of brown bear abundance and movement among six spawning streams for sockeye salmon, O. nerka, in southwestern Alaska. The streams were grouped into two trios on opposite sides of Lake Aleknagik. Thus, we predicted that most bears would forage within only one trio during the spawning season because of the energetic costs associated with swimming between them or traveling around the lake and show fidelity to particular trios across years because of the benefits of familiarity with local salmon dynamics and stream characteristics. Huggins closed-capture models based on encounter histories from genotyped hair samples revealed that as many as 41 individuals visited single streams during the annual 6-week sampling season. Bears also moved freely among trios of streams but rarely moved between these putative foraging neighborhoods, either during or between years. By implication, even small salmon spawning streams can serve as important resources for brown bears, and consistent use of stream neighborhoods by certain bears may play an important role in spatially structuring coastal bear populations. Our findings also underscore the efficacy of noninvasive hair snagging and genetic analysis for examining bear abundance and movements at relatively fine spatial and temporal scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J. Wirsing
- School of Environmental and Forest SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
| | - Thomas P. Quinn
- School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
| | - Curry J. Cunningham
- School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
| | - Jennifer R. Adams
- Department of Fish and Wildlife SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowIdaho
| | - Apryle D. Craig
- School of Environmental and Forest SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
| | - Lisette P. Waits
- Department of Fish and Wildlife SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowIdaho
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aylward ML, Sullivan AP, Perry GH, Johnson SE, Louis EE. An environmental DNA sampling method for aye-ayes from their feeding traces. Ecol Evol 2018; 8:9229-9240. [PMID: 30377496 PMCID: PMC6194247 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Noninvasive sampling is an important development in population genetic monitoring of wild animals. Particularly, the collection of environmental DNA (eDNA) which can be collected without needing to encounter the target animal facilitates the genetic analysis of endangered species. One method that has been applied to these sample types is target capture and enrichment which overcomes the issue of high proportions of exogenous (nonhost) DNA from these lower quality samples. We tested whether target capture of mitochondrial DNA from sampled feeding traces of the aye-aye, an endangered lemur species would yield mitochondrial DNA sequences for population genetic monitoring. We sampled gnawed wood where aye-ayes excavate wood-boring insect larvae from trees. We designed RNA probes complementary to the aye-aye's mitochondrial genome and used these to isolate aye-aye DNA from other nontarget DNA in these samples. We successfully retrieved six near-complete mitochondrial genomes from two sites within the aye-aye's geographic range that had not been sampled previously. Our method demonstrates the application of next-generation molecular techniques to species of conservation concern. This method can likely be applied to alternative foraged remains to sample endangered species other than aye-ayes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan L. Aylward
- Department of Anthropology and ArchaeologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Alexis P. Sullivan
- Department of BiologyPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegePennsylvania
| | - George H. Perry
- Department of BiologyPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegePennsylvania
- Department of AnthropologyPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegePennsylvania
| | - Steig E. Johnson
- Department of Anthropology and ArchaeologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Edward E. Louis
- Grewcock Center for Conservation and ResearchOmaha's Henry Doorly Zoo and AquariumOmahaNebraska
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carroll EL, Bruford MW, DeWoody JA, Leroy G, Strand A, Waits L, Wang J. Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods. Evol Appl 2018; 11:1094-1119. [PMID: 30026800 PMCID: PMC6050181 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The decreasing cost and increasing scope and power of emerging genomic technologies are reshaping the field of molecular ecology. However, many modern genomic approaches (e.g., RAD-seq) require large amounts of high-quality template DNA. This poses a problem for an active branch of conservation biology: genetic monitoring using minimally invasive sampling (MIS) methods. Without handling or even observing an animal, MIS methods (e.g., collection of hair, skin, faeces) can provide genetic information on individuals or populations. Such samples typically yield low-quality and/or quantities of DNA, restricting the type of molecular methods that can be used. Despite this limitation, genetic monitoring using MIS is an effective tool for estimating population demographic parameters and monitoring genetic diversity in natural populations. Genetic monitoring is likely to become more important in the future as many natural populations are undergoing anthropogenically driven declines, which are unlikely to abate without intensive adaptive management efforts that often include MIS approaches. Here, we profile the expanding suite of genomic methods and platforms compatible with producing genotypes from MIS, considering factors such as development costs and error rates. We evaluate how powerful new approaches will enhance our ability to investigate questions typically answered using genetic monitoring, such as estimating abundance, genetic structure and relatedness. As the field is in a period of unusually rapid transition, we also highlight the importance of legacy data sets and recommend how to address the challenges of moving between traditional and next-generation genetic monitoring platforms. Finally, we consider how genetic monitoring could move beyond genotypes in the future. For example, assessing microbiomes or epigenetic markers could provide a greater understanding of the relationship between individuals and their environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L. Carroll
- Scottish Oceans Institute and Sea Mammal Research UnitUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
| | - Mike W. Bruford
- Cardiff School of Biosciences and Sustainable Places Research InstituteCardiff UniversityCardiff, WalesUK
| | - J. Andrew DeWoody
- Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Department of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteINUSA
| | - Gregoire Leroy
- Animal Production and Health DivisionFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsRomeItaly
| | - Alan Strand
- Grice Marine LaboratoryDepartment of BiologyCollege of CharlestonCharlestonSCUSA
| | - Lisette Waits
- Department of Fish and Wildlife SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowIDUSA
| | - Jinliang Wang
- Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Shakeri YN, White KS, Levi T. Salmon-supported bears, seed dispersal, and extensive resource subsidies to granivores. Ecosphere 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yasaman N. Shakeri
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife; Oregon State University; Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| | - Kevin S. White
- Division of Wildlife Conservation; Alaska Department of Fish and Game; Juneau Alaska 99811 USA
| | - Taal Levi
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife; Oregon State University; Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Modave E, MacDonald AJ, Sarre SD. A single mini-barcode test to screen for Australian mammalian predators from environmental samples. Gigascience 2018; 6:1-13. [PMID: 28810700 PMCID: PMC5545080 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/gix052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Identification of species from trace samples is now possible through the comparison of diagnostic DNA fragments against reference DNA sequence databases. DNA detection of animals from non-invasive samples, such as predator faeces (scats) that contain traces of DNA from their species of origin, has proved to be a valuable tool for the management of elusive wildlife. However, application of this approach can be limited by the availability of appropriate genetic markers. Scat DNA is often degraded, meaning that longer DNA sequences, including standard DNA barcoding markers, are difficult to recover. Instead, targeted short diagnostic markers are required to serve as diagnostic mini-barcodes. The mitochondrial genome is a useful source of such trace DNA markers because it provides good resolution at the species level and occurs in high copy numbers per cell. We developed a mini-barcode based on a short (178 bp) fragment of the conserved 12S ribosomal ribonucleic acid mitochondrial gene sequence, with the goal of discriminating amongst the scats of large mammalian predators of Australia. We tested the sensitivity and specificity of our primers and can accurately detect and discriminate amongst quolls, cats, dogs, foxes, and devils from trace DNA samples. Our approach provides a cost-effective, time-efficient, and non-invasive tool that enables identification of all 8 medium-large mammal predators in Australia, including native and introduced species, using a single test. With modification, this approach is likely to be of broad applicability elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elodie Modave
- Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia
| | - Anna J MacDonald
- Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia
| | - Stephen D Sarre
- Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT, 2601, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kirol CP, Pilgrim KL, Sutphin AL, Maechtle TL. Using DNA from hairs left at depredated greater sage-grouse nests to detect mammalian nest predators. WILDLIFE SOC B 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristine L. Pilgrim
- Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; 800 East Beckwith Missoula MT 59801 USA
| | - Andrew L. Sutphin
- Big Horn Environmental Consultants; 730 E Burkitt Sheridan WY 82801 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Harrer LEF, Levi T. The primacy of bears as seed dispersers in salmon‐bearing ecosystems. Ecosphere 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie E. F. Harrer
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| | - Taal Levi
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Advances in Using Non-invasive, Archival, and Environmental Samples for Population Genomic Studies. POPULATION GENOMICS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/13836_2018_45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
23
|
Seeber PA, Soilemetzidou SE, East ML, Walzer C, Greenwood AD. Equine behavioral enrichment toys as tools for non-invasive recovery of viral and host DNA. Zoo Biol 2017; 36:341-344. [PMID: 28901631 DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Direct collection of samples from wildlife can be difficult and sometimes impossible. Non-invasive remote sampling for the purpose of DNA extraction is a potential tool for monitoring the presence of wildlife at the individual level, and for identifying the pathogens shed by wildlife. Equine herpesviruses (EHV) are common pathogens of equids that can be fatal if transmitted to other mammals. Transmission usually occurs by nasal aerosol discharge from virus-shedding individuals. The aim of this study was to validate a simple, non-invasive method to track EHV shedding in zebras and to establish an efficient protocol for genotyping individual zebras from environmental DNA (eDNA). A commercially available horse enrichment toy was deployed in captive Grévy's, mountain, and plains zebra enclosures and swabbed after 4-24 hr. Using eDNA extracted from these swabs four EHV strains (EHV-1, EHV-7, wild ass herpesvirus and zebra herpesvirus) were detected by PCR and confirmed by sequencing, and 12 of 16 zebras present in the enclosures were identified as having interacted with the enrichment toy by mitochondrial DNA amplification and sequencing. We conclude that, when direct sampling is difficult or prohibited, non-invasive sampling of eDNA can be a useful tool to determine the genetics of individuals or populations and for detecting pathogen shedding in captive wildlife.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Seeber
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marion L East
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chris Walzer
- Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alex D Greenwood
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
An eDNA-Based SNP Assay for Ungulate Species and Sex Identification. DIVERSITY-BASEL 2017. [DOI: 10.3390/d9030033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
25
|
Rodgers TW, Xu CCY, Giacalone J, Kapheim KM, Saltonstall K, Vargas M, Yu DW, Somervuo P, McMillan WO, Jansen PA. Carrion fly-derived DNA metabarcoding is an effective tool for mammal surveys: Evidence from a known tropical mammal community. Mol Ecol Resour 2017; 17:e133-e145. [PMID: 28758342 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Revised: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Metabarcoding of vertebrate DNA derived from carrion flies has been proposed as a promising tool for biodiversity monitoring. To evaluate its efficacy, we conducted metabarcoding surveys of carrion flies on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama, which has a well-known mammal community, and compared our results against diurnal transect counts and camera trapping. We collected 1,084 flies in 29 sampling days, conducted metabarcoding with mammal-specific (16S) and vertebrate-specific (12S) primers, and sequenced amplicons on Illumina MiSeq. For taxonomic assignment, we compared blast with the new program protax, and we found that protax improved species identifications. We detected 20 mammal, four bird, and one lizard species from carrion fly metabarcoding, all but one of which are known from BCI. Fly metabarcoding detected more mammal species than concurrent transect counts (29 sampling days, 13 species) and concurrent camera trapping (84 sampling days, 17 species), and detected 67% of the number of mammal species documented by 8 years of transect counts and camera trapping combined, although fly metabarcoding missed several abundant species. This study demonstrates that carrion fly metabarcoding is a powerful tool for mammal biodiversity surveys and has the potential to detect a broader range of species than more commonly used methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torrey W Rodgers
- Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.,Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama
| | - Charles C Y Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.,Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Redpath Museum and Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jacalyn Giacalone
- College of Science and Mathematics, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA
| | - Karen M Kapheim
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.,Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
| | | | - Marta Vargas
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama
| | - Douglas W Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.,School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | - Panu Somervuo
- Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Patrick A Jansen
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.,Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|