Lack of impact of pre-existing T97A HIV-1 integrase mutation on integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance and treatment outcome

Comprehensive Analysis of HIV-1 Integrase Resistance-Related Mutations in African Countries

The growing emergence of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) HIV drug resistance in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) led to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending, in 2018, a transition to dolutegravir (DTG) as a first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in SSA. The broad HIV-1 genetic diversity in SSA could shape DTG effectiveness and the pattern of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in this region. This study evaluated HIV-1 integrase (IN) DRMs and conserved regions among published groups M, N, O, and P HIV-1 sequences spanning forty years of the HIV epidemic during the transition of DTG-based ART. Overall, we found low levels of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-DRMs (<1%) across HIV groups between the years 1983 and 2023; however, it was unexpected to detect DRMs at statistically significantly higher frequencies in pre-INSTI (1983-2007) than in the INSTI (2008-2023) era. The variability of accessory INSTI-DRMs depended on the HIV subtypes, with implications for susceptibility to DTG. Our findings provide new perspectives on the molecular epidemiology and drug resistance profiles of INSTIs in SSA, emphasizing the need for ongoing surveillance and customized treatment approaches to address the continent's varied HIV subtypes and changing resistance patterns.

HIV-1 drug resistance in people on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir in first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) might facilitate emerging resistance. The DTG RESIST study combined data from HIV cohorts to examine patterns of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and identify risk factors for dolutegravir resistance.

METHODS

We included cohorts with INSTI resistance data from two collaborations (ART Cohort Collaboration, International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS in Southern Africa), and the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort. Eight cohorts from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, South Africa, and the UK contributed data on individuals who were viraemic on dolutegravir-based ART and underwent genotypic resistance testing. Individuals with unknown dolutegravir initiation date were excluded. Resistance levels were categorised using the Stanford algorithm. We identified risk factors for resistance using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models.

FINDINGS

We included 599 people with genotypic resistance testing on dolutegravir-based ART between May 22, 2013, and Dec 20, 2021. Most had HIV-1 subtype B (n=351, 59%), a third had been exposed to first-generation INSTIs (n=193, 32%), 70 (12%) were on dolutegravir dual therapy, and 18 (3%) were on dolutegravir monotherapy. INSTI DRMs were detected in 86 (14%) individuals; 20 (3%) had more than one mutation. Most (n=563, 94%) were susceptible to dolutegravir, seven (1%) had potential low, six (1%) low, 17 (3%) intermediate, and six (1%) high-level dolutegravir resistance. The risk of dolutegravir resistance was higher on dolutegravir monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 34·1, 95% CI 9·93-117) and dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy (aOR 9·21, 2·20-38·6) compared with combination ART, and in the presence of potential low or low (aOR 5·23, 1·32-20·7) or intermediate or high-level (aOR 13·4, 4·55-39·7) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance.

INTERPRETATION

Among people with viraemia on dolutegravir-based ART, INSTI DRMs and dolutegravir resistance were rare. NRTI resistance substantially increased the risk of dolutegravir resistance, which is of concern, notably in resource-limited settings. Monitoring is important to prevent resistance at the individual and population level and ensure the long-term sustainability of ART.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health, Swiss National Science Foundation.

sHIV-1 drug resistance in people on dolutegravir-based ART: Collaborative analysis of cohort studies

Background

The widespread use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir (DTG) in first- and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) may facilitate emerging resistance. We combined data from HIV cohorts to examine patterns of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and identify risk factors for DTG resistance.

Methods

Eight cohorts from Canada, Europe, and South Africa contributed data on individuals with genotypic resistance testing on DTG-based ART. Resistance levels were categorised using the Stanford algorithm. We identified risk factors for resistance using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models.

Results

We included 750 people with genotypic resistance testing on DTG-based ART between 2013 and 2022. Most had HIV subtype B (N=444, 59·2%) and were treatment-experienced; 134 (17.9%) were on DTG dual and 19 (2.5%) on DTG monotherapy. INSTI DRMs were detected in 100 (13·3%) individuals; 21 (2·8%) had more than one mutation. Most (N=713, 95·1%) were susceptible to DTG, 8 (1·1%) had potential-low, 5 (0·7%) low, 18 (2·4%) intermediate and 6 (0·8%) high-level DTG resistance. The risk of DTG resistance was higher on DTG monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 37·25, 95% CI 11·17 to 124·2) and DTG lamivudine dual therapy (aOR 6·59, 95% CI 1·70 to 25·55) compared to combination ART, and higher in the presence of potential-low/low (aOR 4.62, 95% CI 1.24 to 17.2) or intermediate/high-level (aOR 7·01, 95% CI 2·52 to 19·48) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) resistance. Viral load on DTG showed a trend towards increased DTG resistance (aOR 1·42, 95% CI 0·92 to 2·19 per standard deviation of log10 area under the viral load curve).

Interpretation

Among people experiencing virological failure on DTG-based ART, INSTI DRMs were uncommon, and DTG resistance was rare. DTG monotherapy and NRTI resistance substantially increased the risk for DTG resistance, which is of concern, notably in resource-limited settings.

Prevalence of HIV-1 Natural Polymorphisms and Integrase-Resistance-Associated Mutations in African Children

Integrase inhibitors (INIs) are a potent option for HIV treatment. Limited data exist on INI resistance in West Africa, particularly in children living with HIV/AIDS. We determined the prevalence of integrase gene polymorphisms and the frequency of naturally occurring amino acid (aa) substitutions at positions associated with INI resistance. Dried blood spot (DBS) samples were obtained from one hundred and seven (107) HIV-1-infected children aged less than 15 years old in two West African countries, Benin and Mali. All children were naïve to INI treatment, 56 were naïve to anti-retroviral therapy (ART), and 51 had received ART. Genetic sequencing of HIV integrase was successful in 75 samples. The aa changes at integrase positions associated with INI resistance were examined according to the Stanford HIV Genotypic Resistance database. The median ages were 2.6 and 10 years for ART-naïve and -treated children, respectively. The most common subtypes observed were CRF02_AG (74.7%) followed by CRF06_cpx (20%). No major INI-resistance mutations at positions 66, 92, 121, 143, 147, 148, 155, and 263 were detected. The most prevalent INI accessory resistance mutations were: L74I/M (14/75, 18.6%) followed by E157Q (8/75, 10.6%), G163E/N/T/Q (5/75, 6.6%), Q95A/H/P (2/75, 2.6%), and T97A (4/75, 5.3%). Other substitutions observed were M50I/L/P, H51E/P/S/Q, I72V, T112V, V201I, and T206S. Polymorphisms at positions which may influence the genetic barrier and/or drive the selection of specific INI-resistance pathways were detected. However, no transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to INI was detected among samples of INI-naïve patients. These findings support the use of this treatment class for children with HIV-1, particularly in West Africa.

Primary resistance against integrase strand transfer inhibitors in integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive patients failing first- and second-line ART in Tanzania

INTRODUCTION

Sub-Saharan African countries are introducing integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in their ART programmes as the preferred first-line regimen, and dolutegravir is the INSTI of choice due to its potency, tolerability and high genetic barrier to resistance. Dolutegravir was introduced into the first-line ART regimen in Tanzania in 2019. However, there is a paucity of data on the occurrence of mutations in HIV lineages circulating in Tanzania. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of INSTI primary resistance mutations in Tanzanian patients exposed to ART but not INSTIs.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 50 INSTI-naive patients failing first- or second-line ART [median (IQR) age: 40 (21.93-46.41) years; 68% women] were subjected to Sanger sequencing of the HIV integrase gene. Participants had been on ART for a median (IQR) duration of 7.32 (4.73-9.29) years, with 80% and 20% failing first- and second-line ART, respectively.

RESULTS

No major INSTI mutations were found, but 2 (4%) participants had the accessory mutation T97A. Using the REGA HIV-1 subtyping tool, HIV subtype A1 (53.1%) was found to be dominant, followed by subtypes C (30.6%) and D (16.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no current evidence for transmitted resistance against INSTIs among unexposed patients failing ART and supports the scale-up of INSTI-based regimens. However, the presence of accessory mutations calls for the surveillance of INSTI resistance mutations to ensure that the anticipated long-term desired outcomes are achieved.

Adherence, resistance, and viral suppression on dolutegravir in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for the TLD era

Dolutegravir (DTG) is now a component of preferred first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. ADVANCE and NAMSAL were two landmark clinical trials conducted exclusively in sub-Saharan Africa, which studied the effectiveness of DTG-based first-line regimens for ART-naive individuals. In this review, we examine the data from these studies to consider the contributions of adherence and HIV drug resistance to treatment failure on DTG-based ART, as compared with efavirenz (EFV)-based ART, which has a lower genetic barrier to resistance. We also discuss the implications of virologic failure on DTG and consolidate currently available data to conclude with recommendations for virologic monitoring on DTG-based ART.

Baseline integrase drug resistance mutations and conserved regions across HIV-1 clades in Cameroon: implications for transition to dolutegravir in resource-limited settings

BACKGROUND

Transition to dolutegravir-based regimens in resource-limited settings (RLS) requires prior understanding of HIV-1 integrase variants and conserved regions. Therefore, we evaluated integrase drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and conserved regions amongst integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-naive patients harbouring diverse HIV-1 clades in Cameroon.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted amongst 918 INSTI-naive patients from Cameroon (89 ART-naive and 829 ART-experienced patients). HIV-1 sequences were interpreted regarding INSTI-DRMs using the Stanford HIVdb v8.9-1 and the 2019 IAS-USA list. Amino acid positions with <1% variability were considered as highly conserved. Subtyping was performed by phylogeny.

RESULTS

Overall prevalence (95% CI) of INSTI-DRMs was 0.8% (0.4-1.7), with 0.0% (0.0-4.0) amongst ART-naive versus 0.9% (0.5-1.9) amongst ART-experienced patients; P = 0.44. Accessory mutations (95% CI) were found in 33.8% (30.9-37.0), with 38.2% (28.1-49.1) amongst ART-naive versus 33.4% (30.4-36.7) amongst ART-experienced patients; P = 0.21. Of 288 HIV-1 integrase amino acid positions, 58.3% were highly conserved across subtypes in the following major regions: V75-G82, E85-P90, H114-G118, K127-W132, E138-G149, Q168-L172, T174-V180, W235-A239 and L241-D253. Wide genetic diversity was found (37 clades), including groups M (92.3%), N (1.4%), O (6.2%) and P (0.1%). Amongst group M, CRF02_AG was predominant (47.4%), with a significantly higher frequency (95% CI) of accessory mutations compared with non-AG [41.4% (36.8-46.0) versus 27.1% (23.3-31.2) respectively; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

The low baseline of INSTI-DRMs (<1%) in Cameroon suggests effectiveness of dolutegravir-based regimens. In spite of high conservation across clades, the variability of accessory mutations between major circulating strains underscores the need for monitoring the selection of INSTI-DRMs while scaling up dolutegravir-based regimens in RLS.

Surveillance of HIV-1 transmitted integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in the UK

Background

HIV treatment guidelines have traditionally recommended that all HIV-positive individuals are tested for evidence of drug resistance prior to starting ART. Testing for resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and PIs is well established in routine care. However, testing for integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) resistance is less consistent.

Objectives

To inform treatment guidelines by determining the prevalence of InSTI resistance in a national cohort of recently infected individuals.

Patients and methods

Recent (within 4 months) HIV-1 infections were identified using a Recent Infection Testing Algorithm of new HIV-1 diagnoses in the UK. Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in integrase, protease and reverse transcriptase were detected by ultradeep sequencing, which allows for the sensitive estimation of the frequency of each resistant variant in a sample.

Results

The analysis included 655 randomly selected individuals (median age = 33 years, 95% male, 83% MSM, 78% white) sampled in the period 2014 to 2016 and determined to have a recent infection. These comprised 320, 138 and 197 samples from 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. None of the samples had major InSTI RAMs occurring at high variant frequency (≥20%). A subset (25/640, 3.9%) had major InSTI RAMs occurring only as low-frequency variants (2%–20%). In contrast, 47/588 (8.0%) had major reverse transcriptase inhibitor and PI RAMs at high frequency.

Conclusions

Between 2014 and 2016, major InSTI RAMs were uncommon in adults with recent HIV-1 infection, only occurring as low-frequency variants of doubtful clinical significance. Continued surveillance of newly diagnosed patients for evidence of transmitted InSTI resistance is recommended to inform clinical practice.

Virologic failure after 48 weeks of raltegravir-based regimen in low HIV-1 incidence setting

Background

With the advent of next generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors, the rates of virologic failure in treated subjects are expected to decrease. In this study, we analyzed the mutation patterns leading to virologic failure before and after starting integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimen as first-line or salvage therapy.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2019, blood samples were received from 258 patients with HIV-1 infection. Plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations, and pol gene sequences were determined at baseline, and 16–48 weeks of treatment with integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimen. Only patients who did not achieve viral suppression at 48 weeks of integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based treatment were eligible for the current study.

Results

Virologic failure was observed in seven patients on raltegravir-based regimen. All patients with virologic failure but one were infected with CRF01_AE virus subtype. Raltegravir based-regimen was offered as first-line therapy for four patients, and as salvage therapy for three patients. M184V mutation associated with high level resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine was detected in six out of seven patients. Primary mutations (Y143C, N155H, T66I, G118R, E138K) conferring high level resistance to raltegravir were detected in only three patients. Pre-existing polymorphic integrase mutation (T97A) was detected in two patients. Furthermore, two patients reported low adherence to treatment.

Conclusions

Emergence of primary mutations in the integrase gene can account for virologic failure in less than half of patients on raltegravir-based regimen. Low adherence to treatment, pre-existing accessory mutations, and resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors may have some role in virologic outcome.

Nucleoside Reverse-Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance Mutations Predict Virological Failure in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients During Lamivudine Plus Dolutegravir Maintenance Therapy in Clinical Practice

The TANGO trial demonstrated the efficacy of lamivudine plus dolutegravir in virologically suppressed patients without previous virological failures (VFs). In this dataset from clinical practice investigating the impact of past nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor resistance on this strategy, the combination of M184V/I plus at least 1 thymidine analog-associated mutation significantly increased the risk of VF.

Predictors of virological failure and time to viral suppression of first line integrase inhibitor based antiretroviral treatment

Background

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) are recommended for first-line treatment of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We identified risk factors, including baseline minor InSTI resistance mutations, for treatment failure of InSTI-based regimens.

Methods

We studied time-to-treatment failure and time to viral suppression among 1419 drug-naive patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. We performed Cox regression models adjusted for demographic factors, baseline HIV RNA/CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events, and the type of InSTI. In 646 patients with a baseline genotypic resistance test of the integrase, we studied the impact of minor integrase resistance mutations.

Results

We observed 121 virological failures during 18 447 person-years of follow-up. A baseline viral load ≥100 000 copies/mL (multivariable hazard ratio [mHR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–3.6) and an AIDS-defining event (mHR, 1.8; 95% CI. 1.1–3.0) were associated with treatment failure. CD4 counts between 200 and 500 cells/µL (mHR, 0.5; 95% CI, .3–.8) and >500 cells/µL (mHR, 0.4; 95% CI, .2–.7) were protective. Time to suppression was shorter in lower viral load strata (mHR, 0.7; 95% CI, .6–.8) and in dolutegravir-based therapy (mHR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0–1.4). Minor resistance mutations were found at baseline in 104 of 646 (16%) patients with no effect on treatment outcome.

Conclusions

Factors associated with treatment failure on InSTI-based first-line regimen remained similar to those of older treatments, in particular high viral load and low CD4 counts.

Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors

The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) having been approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Due to high HIV-1 diversity, it is not well understood how specific naturally occurring polymorphisms (NOPs) in IN may affect the structure/function and binding affinity of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). We applied computational methods of molecular modelling and docking to analyze the effect of NOPs on the full-length IN structure and INSTI binding. We identified 13 NOPs within the Cameroonian-derived CRF02_AG IN sequences and further identified 17 NOPs within HIV-1C South African sequences. The NOPs in the IN structures did not show any differences in INSTI binding affinity. However, linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the Ki and EC50 values for DTG and BIC as strong inhibitors of HIV-1 IN subtypes. All INSTIs are clinically effective against diverse HIV-1 strains from INSTI treatment-naïve populations. This study supports the use of second-generation INSTIs such as DTG and BIC as part of first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens, due to a stronger genetic barrier to the emergence of drug resistance.

HIV-1 Integrase Diversity and Resistance-Associated Mutations and Polymorphisms Among Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-Naive HIV-1 Patients from Cameroon

The World Health Organization (WHO) has put forth recommendations for the use of integrase (IN) strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) to be part of the first-line combination antiretroviral therapy regimen to treat HIV infections. The knowledge of pretreatment drug resistance against INSTIs is still scarce in resource-limited settings (RLS). We characterized the integrase gene to identify resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in 56 INSTI-naive patient viral sequences from Cameroon. Study analysis used 37 sequences with fragment size ≥500 bp or of good quality .The majority of the sequences were identified as CRF02_AG 54.% (n = 20/37) and 45.9% (n = 17/37), other subtype viral sequences include (A, CRF36_cpx, F,G, and C). A total of 18.9% (n = 7/37) of the sequences had RAMs, with only 5.4% (n = 2/37) having major RAMs (Y143R/C/D/G and P145S), against INSTIs. Accessory RAMs were present in 8.1% (n = 3/37) of the sequences, of which one sequence contained solely E157Q, and another Q95K. One patient sequence had three accessory RAMs (G140E, E157Q, and G163R). We identified major RAMs to INSTIs, which might have a potential clinical impact to dolutegravir rollout in RLS, including Cameroon. This is the first study to describe RAMs among INSTI-naive people living with HIV-1 (PLHIV-1) infected with CRF02_AG and other subtypes in Cameroon.

Lack of HIV-1 integrase inhibitor resistance among 392 antiretroviral-naïve individuals in a tertiary care hospital in Beijing, China

: Reports of resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are now not uncommon. We analyzed the HIV int gene from plasma of antiretroviral-naïve individuals during acute and chronic HIV-1 infection. No individual with major INSTI mutations was identified. Two individuals harbored INSTI accessory mutations E157Q/T97A were detected for the first time. Our results emphasize the need to consider testing for INSTI resistance at baseline as this class of drugs is increasingly used in clinical routine.

Antiviral activity of HIV-1 integrase strand-transfer inhibitors against mutants with integrase resistance-associated mutations and their frequency in treatment-naïve individuals

The development of resistance to human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTI) has been documented; however, knowledge of the impact of pre-existing integrase (IN) mutations on INSTI resistance (INSTI-R) is still evolving. The frequency of HIV-1 IN mutations in 2177 treatment-naïve subjects was investigated, along with the INSTI susceptibility of site-directed mutant viruses containing major and minor INSTI-R mutations. Total 6 of 39 minor INSTI-R mutations (M50I, S119P/G/T/R, and E157Q) were found in >1% of IN-treatment-naïve subjects with no impact on INSTI susceptibility. When each combined with major INSTI-R mutation, M50I, S119P, and E157Q led to decreased susceptibility to elvitegravir but remained sensitive to dolutegravir and bictegravir.

Rapid Development of High-Level Resistance to Dolutegravir With Emergence of T97A Mutation in 2 Treatment-Experienced Individuals With Baseline Partial Sensitivity to Dolutegravir

HIV integrase mutation T97A emerges after suboptimal therapy with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), but the contribution of T97A to dolutegravir resistance remains uncertain. Here we report >10-fold increase in dolutegravir resistance after the single addition of T97A in 2 individuals with prior INSTI resistance receiving dolutegravir salvage therapy.

Absence of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations Supports the Use of Dolutegravir in Uganda

To screen for drug resistance and possible treatment with Dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naive patients and those experiencing virologic failure during first-, second-, and third-line combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) in Uganda. Samples from 417 patients in Uganda were analyzed for predicted drug resistance upon failing a first- (N = 158), second- (N = 121), or third-line [all 51 involving Raltegravir (RAL)] treatment regimen. HIV-1 pol gene was amplified and sequenced from plasma samples. Drug susceptibility was interpreted using the Stanford HIV database algorithm and SCUEAL was used for HIV-1 subtyping. Frequency of resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (95%) and non-NRTI (NNRTI, 96%) was high in first-line treatment failures. Despite lack of NNRTI-based treatment for years, NNRTI resistance remained stable in 55% of patients failing second-line or third-line treatment, and was also at 10% in treatment-naive Ugandans. DTG resistance (n = 366) was not observed in treatment-naive individuals or individuals failing first- and second-line cART, and only found in two patients failing third-line cART, while 47% of the latter had RAL- and Elvitegravir-resistant HIV-1. Secondary mutations associated with DTG resistance were found in 2%-10% of patients failing third-line cART. Of 14 drugs currently available for cART in Uganda, resistance was readily observed to all antiretroviral drugs (except for DTG) in Ugandan patients failing first-, second-, or even third-line treatment regimens. The high NNRTI resistance in first-line treatment in Uganda even among treatment-naive patients calls for the use of DTG to reach the UNAIDS 90:90:90 goals.

Analyses of HIV-1 integrase sequences prior to South African national HIV-treatment program and available of integrase inhibitors in Cape Town, South Africa

HIV-Integrase (IN) has proven to be a viable target for highly specific HIV-1 therapy. We aimed to characterize the HIV-1 IN gene in a South African context and identify resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) against available first and second generation Integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (InSTIs). We performed genetic analyses on 91 treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients, as well as 314 treatment-naive South African HIV-1 IN-sequences, downloaded from Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database. Genotypic analyses revealed the absence of major RAMs in the cohort collected before the broad availability of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and INSTI in South Africa, however, occurred at a rate of 2.85% (9/314) in database derived sequences. RAMs were present at IN-positions 66, 92, 143, 147 and 148, all of which may confer resistance to Raltegravir (RAL) and Elvitegravir (EVG), but are unlikely to affect second-generation Dolutegravir (DTG), except mutations in the Q148 pathway. Furthermore, protein modeling showed, naturally occurring polymorphisms impact the stability of the intasome-complex and therefore may contribute to an overall potency against InSTIs. Our data suggest the prevalence of InSTI RAMs, against InSTIs, is low in South Africa, but natural polymorphisms and subtype-specific differences may influence the effect of individual treatment regimens.

Pretreatment integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in North Carolina from 2010-2016

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define the prevalence of pretreatment integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance and assess the transmission networks of those with pretreatment INSTI resistance.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of HIV-positive patients with genotypic resistance testing sent to a single referral laboratory in North Carolina between 2010 and 2016.

METHODS

We linked genotype and public health data for in-care HIV-positive individuals to determine the prevalence of INSTI resistance among treatment-naive (defined as those with a first genotype ≤3 months after diagnosis) and treatment-experienced (defined as those with a first genotype >3 months after diagnosis) patients. We performed molecular and phylogenetic analyses to assess whether pretreatment INSTI resistance mutations represented clustered HIV transmission.

RESULTS

Of 8825 individuals who contributed sequences for protease, reverse transcriptase, or INSTI genotypic resistance testing during the study period, 2784 (31%) contributed at least one sequence for INSTI resistance testing. Of these, 840 were treatment-naive individuals and 20 [2.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5, 3.6%] had INSTI mutations; only two (0.2%, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.9%) had major mutations. Of 1944 treatment-experienced individuals, 9.6% (95% CI: 8.3, 11.0%) had any INSTI mutation and 7.0% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.3%) had major mutations; the prevalence of INSTI mutations among treatment-experienced patients decreased overtime (P < 0.001). In total 12 of 20 individuals with pretreatment INSTI mutations were part of 10 molecular transmission clusters; only one cluster shared identical minor mutations.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of major pretreatment INSTI resistance is very low. Pretreatment INSTI mutations do not appear to represent clustered HIV transmission.

Collaborative update of a rule-based expert system for HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation

INTRODUCTION

HIV-1 genotypic resistance test (GRT) interpretation systems (IS) require updates as new studies on HIV-1 drug resistance are published and as treatment guidelines evolve.

METHODS

An expert panel was created to provide recommendations for the update of the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database (HIVDB) GRT-IS. The panel was polled on the ARVs to be included in a GRT report, and the drug-resistance interpretations associated with 160 drug-resistance mutation (DRM) pattern-ARV combinations. The DRM pattern-ARV combinations included 52 nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTI) DRM pattern-ARV combinations (13 patterns x 4 NRTIs), 27 nonnucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI) DRM pattern-ARV combinations (9 patterns x 3 NNRTIs), 39 protease inhibitor (PI) DRM pattern-ARV combinations (13 patterns x 3 PIs) and 42 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) DRM pattern-ARV combinations (14 patterns x 3 INSTIs).

RESULTS

There was universal agreement that a GRT report should include the NRTIs lamivudine, abacavir, zidovudine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; the NNRTIs efavirenz, etravirine, nevirapine, and rilpivirine; the PIs atazanavir/r, darunavir/r, and lopinavir/r (with "/r" indicating pharmacological boosting with ritonavir or cobicistat); and the INSTIs dolutegravir, elvitegravir, and raltegravir. There was a range of opinion as to whether the NRTIs stavudine and didanosine and the PIs nelfinavir, indinavir/r, saquinavir/r, fosamprenavir/r, and tipranavir/r should be included. The expert panel members provided highly concordant DRM pattern-ARV interpretations with only 6% of NRTI, 6% of NNRTI, 5% of PI, and 3% of INSTI individual expert interpretations differing from the expert panel median by more than one resistance level. The expert panel median differed from the HIVDB 7.0 GRT-IS for 20 (12.5%) of the 160 DRM pattern-ARV combinations including 12 NRTI, two NNRTI, and six INSTI pattern-ARV combinations. Eighteen of these differences were updated in HIVDB 8.1 GRT-IS to reflect the expert panel median. Additionally, HIVDB users are now provided with the option to exclude those ARVs not considered to be universally required.

CONCLUSIONS

The HIVDB GRT-IS was updated through a collaborative process to reflect changes in HIV drug resistance knowledge, treatment guidelines, and expert opinion. Such a process broadens consensus among experts and identifies areas requiring further study.