Is it appropriate for Korean women to adopt the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations for gestational weight gain?

Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women

BACKGROUND

The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines were initially developed for pregnant women in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the IOM guidelines were suitable for pregnant Chinese women.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study comprising 20,593 singleton pregnant women was conducted at the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital (1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019). Applicability was evaluated by comparing the GWG corresponding to the lowest point of the predicted composite risk curve with the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines. The IOM Guidelines serve as the standard for the GWG categories and the pre-pregnancy body mass index. An exponential function model was used to fit the weight gain during pregnancy and the probability of caesarean section, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age. A quadratic function model was used to fit the combined probability of the above-mentioned adverse pregnancy outcomes. The applicability of the IOM guidelines was evaluated by comparing the weights corresponding to the lowest predicted probability with the GWG range recommended by the IOM guidelines.

RESULTS

According to the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines, 43% of the women achieved adequate weight, almost 32% gained excessive weight, and 25% gained inadequate weight. The GWG range proposed by the IOM included the lowest predicted probability value for underweight women and exceeded the lowest predicted probability for normal weight, overweight, and obese women.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2009 IOM guidelines were suitable for Chinese women whose pre-pregnancy body mass index was classified as underweight. The guidelines were not suitable for normal, overweight, or obese pre-pregnancy body mass index classifications. Therefore, based on the above evidence, the 2009 IOM guidelines are not suitable for all Chinese women.

Secular Trends of Birth Weight in Twins and Singletons in South Korea from 2000 to 2020

Whether the decline of birth weight (BW) reported in developed countries in the early 2000s is ongoing remains unknown. Furthermore, despite recent sharp increases in twin births, comparing secular trends of BW between singletons and twins is difficult, as studies have rarely examined secular trends of BW in twins and singletons simultaneously. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the most recent 20-year trends (2000-2020) of BW in twins and singletons in South Korea. Annual natality files from 2000 to 2020 obtained from the Korean Statistical Information Service were analyzed. A yearly decrease of BW was 3 g among singletons and 5 to 6 g in twins from 2000 to 2020, indicating a widening gap of BW between twins and singletons with increasing years. Gestational age (GA) also decreased in twins and singletons with yearly decreases of 0.28 days in singletons and 0.41 days in twins. Whereas BW decreased in term (GA ≥ 37 weeks), and very preterm groups (28 weeks ≤ GA < 32 weeks) from 2000 to 2020 in twins and singletons, it increased in moderate to late preterm (32 weeks ≤ GA < 37 weeks) groups, indicating a non-linear relationship between BW and GA. The prevalence of macrosomia (BW > 4000 g) in singletons decreased from 2000 to 2020, whereas low birth weight (LBW; BW < 2500 g) increased in twins and singletons. LBW is associated with adverse health outcomes. Effective public health strategies aiming at reduction in the incidence of LBW in the population should be developed.

Gestational weight gain adequacy and intrapartum oxytocin and cesarean section use: Observational population-based study in France

INTRODUCTION

Research on maternal prepregnancy weight suggests adiposity is associated with dysfunctional labor, but knowledge about how gestational weight gain (GWG) affects labor is sparse. Our objective was to evaluate associations between GWG adequacy and intrapartum obstetric interventions (oxytocin administration; cesarean section) necessitated by labor dysfunction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using national, population-based French National Perinatal Survey 2016 data, we included term cephalic singleton pregnancies involving trial of labor (n = 9724). For the intrapartum oxytocin administration analysis, we included only women with spontaneous labor (n = 7352). GWG was calculated as the difference between end of pregnancy and prepregnancy weight (both self-reported) and categorized as insufficient, adequate (reference group), or excessive by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI; underweight <18.5, normal weight 18.5-24.9, overweight 25-29.9, obese ≥30 kg/m² ) using the 2009 Institute of Medicine thresholds. Multilevel generalized estimating equation logistic regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for a priori confounders, evaluated intervention-GWG adequacy associations within BMI categories (under/normal weight combined), stratified by parity (primiparas; multiparas).

RESULTS

GWG adequacy was associated with oxytocin use among under/normal weight women (primiparas: insufficient 57.3%, adequate 60.8%, excessive 65.0%, p = 0.014; multiparas: insufficient 27.2%, adequate 29.1%, excessive 36.2%, p < 0.001) and overweight primiparas (insufficient 56.0%, adequate 58.7%, excessive 72.5%, p = 0.002). In unadjusted and adjusted models, trends of increased odds of oxytocin administration among women with excessive GWG were found regardless of parity and prepregnancy BMI. Similarly, among under/normal weight women, GWG adequacy was associated with intrapartum cesarean section (primiparas: insufficient 10.7%, adequate 12.7%, excessive 15.3%, p = 0.014; multiparas: insufficient 3.1%, adequate 3.5%, excessive 6.3%, p < 0.001) with increased cesarean section among multiparas with excessive GWG persisting in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.7). However, intrapartum cesarean section was reduced among multiparas with overweight and obese prepregnancy BMI and excessive GWG.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive GWG was associated with intrapartum oxytocin administration, regardless of parity or prepregnancy BMI, and cesarean section among women with under/normal weight prepregnancy BMI, providing evidence for benefits of healthy GWG for normal labor progression. Additional research is needed to verify our findings and understand differences by BMI.

Gestational weight gain in the REVAMP pregnancy cohort in Western India: Comparison with international and national references

Objective

To determine the trimester specific gestational weight gain (GWG) in a population of pregnant women from Western India and compare it with the Intergrowth-21st international and an Indian reference (GARBH-Ini cohort-Group for Advanced Research on BirtH outcomes).

Study design

A prospective longitudinal observational study was undertaken in Pune, West India and data for gestational weight gain was collected [the REVAMP study (Research Exploring Various Aspects and Mechanisms in Preeclampsia)]. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape method (GAMLSS model) were used to create GWG centile curves according to gestational age, stratified by BMI at recruitment (n = 640) and compared with Intergrowth-21st reference and GARBH-Ini cohort. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between GWG and antenatal risk factors.

Results

The median GWG was 1.68, 5.80, 7.06, and 11.56 kg at gestational ages 18, 26, 30, and 40 weeks, respectively. In our study, pregnant women gained less weight throughout pregnancy compared to Intergrowth-21st study, but more weight compared to the GARBH-Ini cohort centile curves in all the BMI categories. GWG in overweight/obese women (BMI ≥ 25) was significantly lower (<0.001) as compared to underweight (BMI < 18.5), or normal weight women (BMI ≥ 18.5 and <25). The median GWG at 40 weeks in underweight, normal and overweight/obese women was 13.18, 11.74, and 10.48 kg, respectively. Higher maternal BMI, older maternal age, higher parity and higher hemoglobin concentrations were associated with lower GWG, while taller maternal height was associated with greater GWG.

Conclusion

GWG of Indian women is lower than the prescriptive standards of the Intergrowth charts.

Gestational Weight Gain Below Instead of Within The Guidelines per Class of Maternal Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To systematically investigate a wide range of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes with respect to gestational weight gain (GWG) below the current IOM and ACOG guidelines compared to within the guidelines and to stratify outcomes by the class of obesity and by the type of study analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched studies on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 2009 to April 30, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies with respect to GWG below the current IOM and ACOG guidelines compared to within the guidelines, investigated in obesity overall (BMI> 30 kg/m²), and/or class of obesity (I: BMI 30-34.9 kg/m², II: BMI 35-39.9 kg/ m² and III: BMI> 40 kg/m²).

METHODS

Among the studies that met criteria, multiple obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were tabulated and compared between pregnancies with weight gain below the guidelines and those with weight gain within the guidelines, further classified by the class of obesity if applicable. Primary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), preeclampsia (PE), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Secondary outcomes included cesarean section (CS), preterm birth (PTB), postpartum weight retention, and composite neonatal morbidity. Meta-analysis of univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis studies were conducted. The random-effect model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² value. Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess individual study quality.

RESULTS

Total of 54 studies reporting on 30,245,946 pregnancies were included, of which 11,515,411 pregnancies were in the univariate analysis and 18,730,535 pregnancies in the adjusted multivariate analysis. In the meta-analysis of univariate studies, compared to women who gained within the guidelines, those who gained below the guidelines had higher odds for SGA in obesity class I and II (OR:1.30 (95% CI 1.17, 1.45), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 1.56 (95% CI 1.31, 1.85), I² 0%, P<0.00001), respectively), however, the incidence of SGA was below the expected limits (<10%) and was not associated with increased neonatal morbidity. Furthermore, after adjusting for covariates, that difference was no statistically significant anymore. The difference was not statistically significant for class III obesity. Following adjusted multivariate analysis, no significant differences in SGA rates were noted for all classes of obesity between groups. Significantly lower odds for LGA were seen in GWG below guidelines in obesity class I, II, and III (OR: 0.69 (95% CI 0.64, 0.73), I² 0%, P<0.00001, OR: 0.68 (95% CI 0.63, 0.74), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 0.65 (95% CI 0.57, 0.75), I² 34%, P<0.00001, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. Women with weight gain below guidelines had significantly lower odds for PE in obesity class I, II, and III (OR: 0.71 (95% CI 0.63, 0.79),), I² 0%, P<0.00001, OR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.73, 0.91), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.70, 0.94), I² 0%, P=0.006, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. No significant differences were seen in GDM between groups. Regarding PTB, available univariate analysis studies only reported on overall obesity and mixed iatrogenic and spontaneous PTB showing significant increase in the odds of PTB (OR: 1.42 (95% CI 1.40, 1.43), I² 0%, P<0.00001) in women with low weight gain, while adjusted multivariate studies in overall obesity and in all three classes and showed no significant differences of PTB between groups. Women with low weight gain had significantly lower odds for CS in obesity class I, II, and III (OR: 0.76 (95% CI 0.72, 0.81), I² 0%, P<0.00001, OR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.77, 0.87), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 0.87 (95% CI 0.82, 0.91), I² 0%, P<0.00001, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. There was significantly lower odds for postpartum weight retention (OR: 0.20 (95% CI 0.05, 0.82)), I² 0%, P=0.03) and lower odds for composite neonatal morbidity in the overall obesity group with low GWG (OR: 0.93 (95% CI 0.87, 0.99)), I² 19.6%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to previous reports, the current systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant increase in SGA rates in pregnancies with weight gain below the current guidelines for all classes of maternal obesity. Furthermore, gaining below the guidelines was associated with lower LGA, PE, and CS rates. Our study provides the evidence that the current recommended GWG is high for all classes of obesity. These results provide pertinent information supporting the notion to revisit the current GWG recommendations for women with obesity and furthermore to classify them by the class of obesity rather than one overall obesity category as is done in the current recommendations.

Comparison between American Institute of Medicine Guidelines and Local Recommendation for Gestational Weight Gain in Taiwanese Primiparous Women

OBJECTIVES

American Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends different ranges of gestational weight gain (GWG) based on pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). In Taiwan, IOM guidelines are implemented concurrently with the local recommendation for GWG (10-14 kg). This study compared between the two sets of guidelines in relation to adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 31,653 primiparas with singletons from 2011 to 2016 annual National Breastfeeding Surveys. Logistic regressions for preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), cesarean section and excessive postpartum weight retention (EPWR) were fitted separately for GWG categorized according to IOM and Taiwan ranges. Areas under the receiver-operator curves (AUC) and the predicted probabilities for each outcome were compared in each BMI group.

RESULTS

AUC for both guidelines ranged within 0.51-0.73. Compared to Taiwan recommendation, IOM ranges showed lower probabilities of SGA for underweight (0.11-0.15 versus 0.14-0.18), of LGA for obese (0.12-0.15 versus 0.15-0.18), of EPWR for overweight (0.19-0.30 versus 0.27-0.39), and obese (0.15-0.22 versus 0.25-0.36); and higher probabilities of EPWR for underweight (0.17-0.33 versus 0.14-0.22). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Discriminative performance of IOM and Taiwan recommendations was poor for the five adverse birth outcomes, and no preference for either set of recommendations could be inferred from our results. In the absence of specific GWG guidelines, health care workers may provide inconsistent information to their patients. Future research is needed to explore optimal GWG ranges that can reliably predict locally relevant perinatal outcomes for mother and child.

Prevalence and temporal trends in prepregnancy nutritional status and gestational weight gain of adult women followed in the Brazilian Food and Nutrition Surveillance System from 2008 to 2018

Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are the most investigated indicators of maternal nutritional status, which is a modifiable factor that plays a vital role in maternal and infant health. This study describes prepregnancy BMI and GWG of 840,243 women with 2,087,765 weight observations in the Brazilian Food and Nutrition Surveillance System from 2008 to 2018. Prepregnancy BMI was classified according to the World Health Organization cut‐offs. Total GWG was calculated from weight measurements taken after 36 weeks of pregnancy and classified according to the Institute of Medicine guidelines. Temporal trends in prepregnancy BMI status were examined, and maps were used to evaluate changes in excessive GWG in each Brazilian federation unit. On overall, prepregnancy overweight and obesity increased from 22.6% to 28.8% and from 9.8% to 19.8%, respectively, between 2008 and 2018. The prevalence of excessive GWG rose from 34.2% to 38.7% during the same period and in 11 of the 27 Brazilian federation units between 2008 and 2016. Women with underweight showed the highest values for mean total GWG for all the compared years (overall variation from 12.3 to 13.1 kg), followed by those with normal weight (11.9 to 12.5 kg), overweight (10.1 to 10.9 kg) and obesity (from 8.2 to 8.9 kg). Within each BMI group, values remained fairly stable throughout the studied period for first‐ and second‐trimester GWG and total GWG. These results help to fill a significant gap in understanding the distribution of prepregnancy BMI and GWG in Brazilian women.

Macrosomia and large for gestational age in Asia: One size does not fit all

Macrosomia, usually defined as infant birth weight of ≥4000 g, does not consider gestational age, sex, or country/region-specific differences in mean birth weight and maternal body weight. This issue is particularly relevant for Asia, where 60% of the world's population lives, due to variations in maternal size and birth weights across populations. Large for gestational age (LGA), defined as birth weight > 90th centile, is a more sensitive measure as it considers gestational age and sex, though it is dependent on the choice of growth charts. We aimed to review reporting of macrosomia and LGA in Asia. We reviewed the literature on prevalence and risk of macrosomia and LGA in Asia over the last 29 years. Prevalence of macrosomia ranged from 0.5% (India) to 13.9% (China) while prevalence of LGA ranged from 4.3% (Korea) to 22.1% (China), indicating substantial variation in prevalence within and between Asian countries. High pre-pregnancy body mass index, excessive gestational weight gain, and impaired glucose tolerance conferred risk of macrosomia/LGA. Incidence of macrosomia and LGA varies substantially within and between Asian countries, as do the growth charts and definitions. The latter makes it impossible to make comparisons but suggests differences in intrauterine growth between populations. Reporting LGA, using standardized country/regional growth charts, would better capture the incidence of high birth weight and allow for comparison and identification of contributing factors. Better understanding of local drivers of excessive intrauterine growth could enable development of improved strategies for prevention and management of LGA.

Gestational weight gain in sub-Saharan Africa: Estimation based on pseudo-cohort design

Background

Inadequate or excess gestational weight gain (GWG) leads to multiple undesirable birth outcomes. Yet, in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) little is known about the weight gain pattern in pregnancy. The purpose of the study is to estimate the average gestational weight gain (GWG) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and to examined whether there had been recent improvements or not.

Methods

Based on cross-sectional anthropometric data extracted from multiple Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in SSA, we estimated the average GWG in the region. Pseudo-cohort design was used to reconstruct GWG trajectories based on aggregated data of 110,482 women extracted from 30 recent surveys. Trend in GWG between 2000 and 2015 was determined using the data of 11 SSA countries. Pre-pregnancy weight was estimated based on the weight of non-pregnant women at risk of conception.

Results

On average, women in SSA gain inadequate weight (6.6 kg, 95% confidence interval, 6.0–7.2) over pregnancy. No meaningful gain was observed in the first trimester; whereas, women in the second and third trimesters put on 2.2 and 3.2 kg, respectively. The highest weight gain (10.5, 8.2–12.9 kg) was observed in Southern African sub-region and the lowest in Western Africa (5.8, 5.0–6.6 kg). The GWG among women who had secondary or above education (9.5, 8.2–10.9 kg) was higher than women with lower education (5.0, 4.3–5.8 kg). Likewise, GWG in women from richest households (9.0, 7.2–10.7 kg) was superior to those from poorest households (6.1, 5.3–7.0 kg). The estimated recent (2015–20) mean GWG (6.6, 5.8–7.4 kg) was not significantly different from what had been at beginning of the new millennium (6.7, 5.9–7.5 kg).

Conclusion

In SSA GWG is extremely low and is not showing improvements.

Association of gestational weight gain with cesarean section: a prospective birth cohort study in Southwest China

Background

Cesarean section (CS) is a rising public health issue globally, and is particularly serious in China. Numerous studies have suggested that gestational weight gain (GWG) control may be an effective way to reduce the rate of CS. However, rare study has examined the association between GWG and CS among women in Southwest China. We proposed to examine their association based on a prospective birth cohort, and further to explore the optimal GWG range.

Methods

We retrieved data from a prospective birth cohort from Sichuan Provincial Hospital for Women and Children, Southwest China. Unconditional multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between GWG and CS by adjusting for potential confounders. In one analysis, we incorporated the GWG as a categorical variable according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendation, similar to the method used in the majority of previous studies. In the other analysis, we directly incorporated GWG as a continuous variable and natural cubic splines were used to characterize the potential nonlinear exposure-response relationship, aiming to identify the optimal GWG. We further stratified the above analysis by pre-pregnancy BMI and GDM, and then a heterogeneity test based on a multivariate meta-analysis was conducted to examine whether the stratum specific estimations agreed with each other.

Results

A total of 1363 participants were included. By adopting the IOM recommendation, the adjusted OR of CS was 0.63 (0.47, 0.84) for insufficient GWG and 1.42 (1.06, 1.88) for excessive GWG. After stratification by pre-pregnancy BMI, we found a higher risk of CS in associated with excessive GWG in the stratum of underweight compared with the other strata, which implied that pre-pregnancy BMI may be an effect modifier. By applying a flexible spline regression, the optimal GWG levels in terms of reducing the CS rate based on our data were more stringent than those of IOM recommendation, which were 9–12 kg for underweight women, < 19 kg for normal weight women and < 10 kg for overweight/obese women.

Conclusions

These results suggested that a more stringent recommendation should be applied in Southwest China, and that more attention should be given to underweight women.

Gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies in Korea: application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations

Objective

To investigate the effect of gestational weight gain (GWG) on maternal and neonatal outcomes based on the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for twin pregnancies.

Methods

This study included women with twin pregnancies who delivered at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Based on the weight gain per gestational week according to the 2009 IOM guidelines, the subjects were divided into the following 3 groups: inadequate, adequate, and excessive GWG. We compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes of each group.

Results

A total of 1,738 twin pregnancies were included in our study. Of these cases, 881, 694, and 163 (50.7%, 39.9%, and 9.4%, respectively) twin pregnancies were categorized into the inadequate, adequate, and excessive GWG groups, respectively. In the inadequate GWG group, the risks of preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR, 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63–3.34) and delivering neonates who were small for gestational age (aOR, 1.92, 95% CI, 1.42–2.60) were increased, and the risk of preeclampsia (aOR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.32–0.76) was decreased. The excessive GWG group had an increased risk of the neonates being large for gestational age (aOR, 1.79, 95% CI, 1.15–2.81).

Conclusion

The 2009 IOM recommendations for GWG can be applied to Korean women with twin pregnancies to help achieve optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, more than half of the women were categorized as having inadequate weight gain according to the guidelines. Further studies should be performed to obtain Korean national references for GWG in twin pregnancies.

Gestational weight gain charts for twin pregnancies in Southeast China

Background

To establish age-standardized charts of weight gain for term twin pregnancies in Southeast China.

Methods

We designed a retrospective study on data from women pregnant with twins, a gestational age beyond 36 weeks and an average weight ≥ 2500 g. We established hierarchical linear regression models to express gestational weight gain patterns.

Results

We analyzed data from 884 women pregnant with twins (151 underweight, 597 normal weight, and 136 overweight). Our final models fit the crude weight measurement data well. The means of weight gain generally decreased as the pre-pregnancy BMI increased. For each BMI category, the mean weight gains increased with the gestational age and the standard deviation increased slightly. The mean weight gains were 18.82 ± 6.73, 18.53 ± 6.74, and 16.97 ± 6.95 kg at 37 weeks in underweight, normal weight, and overweight women, respectively.

Conclusion

The weight gain chart can be used to estimate maternal weight gain to be gestational age–standardized z scores by pre-pregnancy BMI and may serve as an innovative tool for perinatal care providers to guide the weight gain of women pregnant with twins.

The Effect of Gestational Weight Gain Across Reproductive History on Maternal Body Mass Index in Midlife: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation

Background: Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is common and has been shown to be associated with increased long-term maternal weight. However, less is known on whether there is a cumulative effect of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) over multiple pregnancies. Methods: Data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation were used, restricted to parous women with no history of stillbirth or premature birth. The effect of the number of excessive GWG pregnancies on body mass index (BMI) in midlife (age 42-53) was analyzed using multivariable linear regression. Fully adjusted models included parity, inadequate GWG, demographic, and behavioral characteristics. Results: The 1181 women included in this analysis reported a total of 2693 births. Overall, 466 (39.5%) were categorized as having at least one pregnancy with excessive GWG. The median BMI at midlife was 26.0 kg/m² (interquartile range 22.5-31.1). In fully adjusted models, each additional pregnancy with excessive GWG was associated with 0.021 higher estimated log BMI (p = 0.031). Among women with 1-3 births, adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) BMI for those with 0, 1, 2, and 3 excessive GWG pregnancies was 25.4 (24.9-25.9), 26.8 (26.1-27.5), 27.5 (26.6-28.4), and 28.8 (27.3-30.5), respectively. Conclusions: In this multiethnic study of women with a history of term live births, the number of pregnancies with excessive GWG was associated with increased maternal BMI in midlife. Our findings suggest that prevention of excessive GWG at any point in a woman's reproductive history can have an impact on long-term maternal health.

Application of Japanese guidelines for gestational weight gain to multiple pregnancy outcomes and its optimal range in 101,336 Japanese women

This study was performed to investigate whether the Japanese guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) can be used to determine the risks of multiple pregnancy outcomes and estimate optimal GWG in 101,336 women with singleton pregnancies in 2013. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that the risks associated with low birth weight, small for gestational age, and preterm birth increased significantly with weight gain below the Japanese guidelines, and the risks of macrosomia and large for gestational age increased with weight gain above the guidelines regardless of Asian-specific pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). The GWG cutoff points estimated from the adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristics curve >0.6 corresponded to 10–13.8 kg in underweight women with pre-pregnancy BMI < 18.5 kg/m²; 10–13.7 kg in normal weight women with pre-pregnancy BMI 18.5–22.9 kg/m²; 8.5–11.4 kg in overweight women with pre-pregnancy BMI 23–24.9 kg/m², 5–13.3 kg in obese women with pre-pregnancy BMI 25–29.9 kg/m²; and 4.7 kg in obese women with pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m². The optimal GWG ranges proposed by the present study are slightly higher than those recommended by the current Japanese guidelines.

Effect of maternal weight gain according to the Institute of Medicine recommendations on pregnancy outcomes in a Chinese population

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the effects of maternal weight on adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from a hospital in Wuhan, China. A total of 1593 pregnant women with singletons were included. Adverse outcomes during pregnancy, such as small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) were analyzed.

Results

The risks of low birth weight, SGA, and preterm birth were significantly higher in the inadequate gestational weight gain (GWG) group compared with the adequate GWG group. GWG over the guidelines was related to a higher risk of macrosomia, LGA, cesarean section, and HDP than GWG within the guidelines. The risks of low birth weight (OR = 5.082), SGA (OR = 3.959), preterm birth (OR = 3.422), and gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.784) were significantly higher in women with a normal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and inadequate GWG compared with women with a normal pre-pregnancy BMI and adequate GWG. The risks of macrosomia (OR = 3.654) and HDP (OR = 1.992) were increased in women with normal pre-pregnancy BMI and excessive GWG.

Conclusion

Women with an abnormal BMI and inappropriate GWG have an increased risk of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Weight management during the perinatal period is required.

Ethnic Disparities in Gestational Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ethnicity has long been described as a major risk factor for the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and it is widely recognised that women from ethnicities other than Europids are at higher risk of developing GDM. There are also described differences between ethnicities in key GDM pregnancy outcomes. This review describes some of the factors that relate to the ethnic disparities in GDM.

RECENT FINDINGS

The global prevalence of GDM has been steadily increasing and estimated to be 16.2% from the International Diabetes Federation extrapolation. Reported prevalence rates may understate the true prevalence, due to factors of access and attitudes to GDM diagnosis and screening in low resource settings for foreign-born women and indigenous populations. Other factors may relate to genes associated with specific ethnicities, obesity, body composition and gestational weight gain. Various factors such as access to screening, body composition, genetics and gestational weight gain may result in ethnic disparities in the prevalence and outcomes of GDM.

The Association Between Low 50 g Glucose Challenge Test Values and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The implications of low values on the 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) in pregnancy are not clearly defined. Few studies have evaluated the influence of maternal low GCT values on obstetrical outcomes. This study aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes between women with low 50 g GCT values and those with normal values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women undergoing gestational diabetes mellitus screening at 24-28 weeks of gestational age between January 2010 and December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Women with multifetal pregnancies, prepregnancy type I or II diabetes, GCT performed before 24 or after 28 weeks of gestational age, and women undergoing multiple GCTs in the same pregnancy were excluded. Low GCT values and normal GCT values were defined as ≤85 mg/dL and 86-130 mg/dL, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 3875 screened subjects, 519 (13.4%) women were included in the low GCT group and 3356 (86.6%) in the normal GCT group. Low GCT women had a significantly higher rate of small for gestational age (SGA) infants than normal GCT women (10.8% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.02). Cesarean section and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) were less frequent in low GCT women than in normal women (32.6% vs. 42.8%, p < 0.01 and 0.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.03, respectively). Low GCT women had a 1.38-fold increased risk of bearing SGA infants (95% confidence intervals: 1.01-1.88, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Rate of SGA infants was significantly higher and cesarean delivery and PPH rates were significantly lower in women with low GCT values. Low GCT values were independently associated with an increased risk of SGA.