Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis

Comparison of tacrolimus with or without prednisone therapy in primary membranous nephropathy: a retrospective clinical study

Previous studies showed tacrolimus monotherapy and dual therapy with tacrolimus and prednisone as effective treatment modalities in managing membranous nephropathy. However, few studies have compared these therapeutic regimens. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment regimen: (1) tacrolimus and prednisone dual therapy (T + P group, n = 67) treatment group; and (2) tacrolimus monotherapy (T group, n = 65) or the control group. Propensity matching method and subgroup analysis to eliminate the bias in the relationship between the treatment regimen and the outcomes. The mean remission times were 20.33 ± 2.75 weeks at T group and 9.50 ± 1.81 weeks at T + P group. The T group had a remission rates of 73.33, 76.66 and 66.66% at 12weeks, 24weeks and 48weeks, while the T + P group had a remission rate of 81.66, 86.66, 91.66%; At the follow-up of 48 weeks, the relapse rate for the T group was 21.66%, and that for the T + P group was 5%. The anti-PLA2R ab is positive and therapy may be the independent risk factors for predicting remission. Tacrolimus and low-dose prednisone dual therapy is efficacious in managing MN and lowers the recurrence rate in clinical practice.

Anti-CD20 should be the first-line treatment in high-risk membranous nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults and if untreated can progress to endstage kidney disease. Factors considered to place a patient at high or very high risk for progression include elevated serum creatinine at baseline, declining kidney function, persistent heavy proteinuria (>8 g/24 h), or persistent NS, presence of life-threatening complications related to NS (such as venous thromboembolic events), or very high anti-PLA2R antibody titers (>150 RU/ml). Patients who are at high or very high risk of progression should be treated with immunosuppression therapy to induce remission of proteinuria and to avoid progressive loss of kidney function. Traditional forms of immunosuppression for patients with MN have included the use of cyclic courses of corticosteroids with cyclophosphamide or calcineurin inhibitors. These forms of therapy are associated with significant toxicity, e.g. corticosteroids (infections, diabetes, weight gain), cyclophosphamide (infertility, severe leukopenia, malignancy), and calcineurin inhibitors (hypertension, nephrotoxicity). The introduction of anti-CD20+ B-cell therapies in the late 1990s has changed the landscape. In this article we will argue that anti-CD20+ B therapy should be the treatment of choice for patients at high/very high risk of progression when considering its efficacy and side-effect profile.

Efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii multiglucoside for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review with bayesian meta-analysis

Background: Currently, the optimal therapy plan for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains controversial as there has been no comprehensive and systematic comparison of therapy plans for IMN. Therefore, in this study, a Bayesian meta-analysis was used to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of various intervention plans involving traditional Chinese medicine TWM in the treatment of IMN. Methods: An electronic search in 7 databases was conducted from their inception to August 2022 for all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of various intervention plans for IMN. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by using software R, and the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) probability curve was plotted for each outcome indicator to rank the efficacy and safety of different intervention plans. Results: A total of 30 RCTs were included, involving 13 interventions. The results showed that (1) in terms of total remission (TR), ① GC + CNI + TWM was the best effective among all plans, and the addition and subtraction plan of CNI + TWM was the best effective for IMN; ② All plans involving TWM were more effective than GG; ③ Among monotherapy plans for IMN, TWM was more effective distinctly than GC, while TWM and CNI were similarly effective; ④ Among multidrug therapy plans for IMN, the addition of TWM to previously established therapy plans made the original plans more effective; ⑤The efficacy of combining TWM with other plans was superior to that of TWM alone. (2) In terms of lowering 24 h-UTP, GC + TWM was the best effective and more effective than TWM. (3) In terms of safety, there was no statistically significant difference between all groups. However, CNI + TWM was the safest. No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in all the included studies. Conclusion: The addition of TWM may be beneficial to patients with IMN. It may enhance the efficacy of previously established treatment protocols without leading to additional safety risks. In particular, GC + CNI + TWM, GC + TWM, and CNI + TWM with better efficacy and higher safety can be preferred in clinical decision-making as the therapy plans for IMN.

Immunosuppressive Agent Options for Primary Nephrotic Syndrome: A Review of Network Meta-Analyses and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Therapeutic options with immunosuppressive agents for glomerular diseases have widened with refinements to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines from 2012 to 2021. However, international guidelines do not necessarily match the reality in each country. Expensive therapies such as rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors are sometimes inaccessible to patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome due to cost or regulations. Under the Japanese medical insurance system, rituximab is accessible but still limited to steroid-dependent patients who developed idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood. Based on international KDIGO guidelines and other national guidelines, possible applications of immunosuppressive agents for nephrotic syndrome are comprehensively examined in this review. While rituximab has become the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy for nephrotic syndrome, clinical trials have indicated that options such as cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate mofetil would be preferable. Given the rising number of patients with nephrotic syndrome worldwide, KDIGO guidelines mention the need for further consideration of cost-effectiveness. If the new option of rituximab is to be the first choice in combination with steroids for nephrotic syndrome, its cost-effectiveness should also be verified. Among the few studies examining the cost-effectiveness of treatments for nephrotic syndrome, administration of rituximab to young adults has been shown to be cost-beneficial, at least in Japan. However, further large-scale studies involving multiple facilities are needed to verify such findings. Network meta-analyses have concluded that the efficacy of rituximab remains controversial and confirmation through high-quality studies of large cohorts is needed. To this end, the mechanisms of action underlying immunosuppressive agents, both old and new, need to be understood and experience must be accumulated to evaluate possible effects and side effects.

From KDIGO 2012 towards KDIGO 2021 in idiopathic membranous nephropathy guidelines: what has changed over the last 10 years?

The recommendations in the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 guidelines regarding Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (IMN) management include significant changes as compared to those published in 2012. According to the recent guidelines, a biopsy is not always needed for IMN diagnosis; since diagnosis can be allowed for by the detection of circulating antibodies against the M-type transmembrane phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2R). Moreover, alterations in anti-PLA2R concentrations, along with other serum and urinary markers, may guide further follow-up. The findings of numerous recent studies which compared different immunosuppressive treatments resulted in substantial changes in treatment indications in the KDIGO 2021 guidelines, suggesting the stratification of patients into four risk categories. The definition of resistant cases and relapses was likewise modified. All the above will lead to a more granular and personalized approach, whose results need to be tested over time. In this commentary, we discuss the changes in the 2012 and 2021 guidelines, adding information from the most recent literature.

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: An updated network meta-analysis

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of different pharmacological treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Thirty-four relevant studies were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and MEDLINE. Treatment with tacrolimus (TAC), cyclophosphamide (CTX), mycophenolate mofetil, chlorambucil (CHL), cyclosporin A (CSA), steroids, rituximab (RTX), and conservative therapy were compared. Outcomes were measured using remission rate and incidence of side effects. Summary estimates were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. In the direct meta-analysis for comparison of complete remission (CR) rate, the curative effect of RTX is inferior to CTX (OR 0.37; CI 0.18, 0.75). In the NMA of CR rate, the results showed that the curative effects of CTX, CHL, and TAC were significantly higher than those of the control group. The efficacy of RTX is not inferior to the CTX (OR 0.81; CI 0.32, 2.01), and the level of evidence was moderate; CSA was not as effective as RTX, and the difference was statistically significant with moderate evidence (OR 2.98, CI 1.00, 8.91). In summary, we recommend CTX and RTX as the first-line drug for IMN treatment.

Efficacy and safety of 12 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults: A pairwise and network meta-analysis

Background: Immunosuppressants have been applied in the remedy of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) extensively. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants do not have final conclusion. Thus, a pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out to seek the most recommended therapeutic schedule for patients with IMN.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including cyclophosphamide (CTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus-combined mycophenolate mofetil (TAC + MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus (TAC), leflunomide (LEF), chlorambucil (CH), azathioprine (AZA), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), non-immunosuppressive therapies (CON), steroids (STE), mizoribine (MZB), and rituximab (RIT) for patients with IMN were checked. Risk ratios (RRs) and standard mean difference (SMD) were reckoned to assess dichotomous variable quantities and continuous variable quantities, respectively. Total remission (TR) and 24-h urine total protein (24-h UTP) were compared using pairwise and NMA. Then interventions were ranked on the basis of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results: Our study finally included 51 RCTs and 12 different immunosuppressants. Compared with the CON group, most regimens demonstrated better therapeutic effect in TR, with RR of 2.1 (95% CI) (1.5–2.9) for TAC, 1.9 (1.3–2.8) for RIT, 2.5 (1.2–5.2) for TAC + MMF, 1.9 (1.4–2.7) for CH, 1.8 (1.4–2.4) for CTX, 2.2 (1.0–4.7) for ACTH, 1.6 (1.2–2.1) for CsA, 1.6 (1.0–2.5) for LEF, and 1.6 (1.1–2.2) for MMF. In terms of 24-h UTP, TAC (SMD, −2.3 (95% CI −3.5 to −1.1)), CTX (SMD, −1.7 (95% CI −2.8 to −0.59)), RIT (SMD, −1.8 (95% CI −3.5 to −0.11)), CH (SMD, −2.4 (95% CI −4.3 to −0.49)), AZA (SMD, −−4.2 (95% CI −7.7 to −0.68)), and CsA (SMD, −1.7 (95% CI −3 to −0.49)) were significantly superior than the CON group. As for adverse effects (AEs), infections, nausea, emesia, myelosuppression, and glucose intolerance were the collective adverse events for most immunosuppressants.

Conclusion: This study indicates that TAC + MMF performed the best in terms of TR, and TAC shows the best effectiveness on 24-h UTP compared with other regimens. On the contrary, there seems to be little advantage on STE alone, LEF, AZA, and MZB in treating patients with IMN compared with CON.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021287013]

Revisiting immunological and clinical aspects of membranous nephropathy

Idiopathic or primary membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults and the elderly. It is characterized by a thickening of the wall of the glomerular capillaries due to the presence of immune complex deposits. 85% of membranous nephropathy cases are classified as primary or idiopathic (IMN). The rest are of secondary origin (SMN), caused by autoimmune conditions or malignant tumors as lung cancer, colon and melanomas. It is an organ-specific autoimmune disease in which the complement system plays an important role with the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC; C5b-9), which produces an alteration of the podocyte structure. The antigen responsible for 70-80% of IMN is a podocyte protein called M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). More recently, another podocyte antigen has been identified, the "Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A" (THSD7A), which is responsible for 10% of the cases of negative IMN for anti- PLA2R.

Screening and Analysis of Key Genes in miRNA-mRNA Regulatory Network of Membranous Nephropathy

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are confirmed to participate in occurrence, development, and prevention of membranous nephropathy (MN), but their mechanism of action is unclear.

Objective

With the GEO database and the use of bioinformatics, miRNA-mRNA regulatory network genes relevant to MN were explored and their potential mechanism of action was explained.

Methods

The MN-related miRNA chip data set (GSE51674) and mRNA chip data set (GSE108109) were downloaded from the GEO database. Differential analysis was performed using the GEO2R online tool. TargetScan, miRTarBase, and StarBase databases were used to predict potential downstream target genes regulated by differentially expressed miRNAs, and the intersection with differential genes were taken to obtain candidate target genes. According to the regulatory relationship between miRNA and mRNA, the miRNA-mRNA relationship pair was clarified and Cytoscape was used to construct a miRNA-mRNA regulatory network. WebGestalt was used to conduct enrichment analysis of the biological process of differential mRNAs in the regulatory network; FunRich analyzes the differential mRNA pathways in the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network. And the STRING database was used to construct a PPI network for candidate target genes, and Cytoscape visually analyzes the PPI network.

Results

Experiments were conducted to screen differentially expressed miRNAs and mRNAs. There were 30 differentially expressed miRNAs, including 22 upregulated and 8 downregulated; and 1267 differentially expressed mRNAs, including 536 upregulated and 731 downregulated. Using TargetScan, miRTarBase, and StarBase databases to predict the downstream targets of differentially expressed miRNAs, 2957 downstream target genes coexisting in the 3 databases were predicted to intersect with differentially expressed mRNAs to obtain 175 candidate target genes. Finally, 36 miRNA-mRNA relationship pairs comprising 10 differentially expressed miRNAs and 27 differentially expressed mRNAs were screened out, and the regulatory network was constructed. Further analysis revealed that the miRNA regulatory network genes may be involved in the development of membranous nephropathy by mTOR, PDGFR-β, LKB1, and VEGF/VEGFR signaling pathways.

Conclusion

The miRNA regulatory network genes may participate in the regulation of podocyte autophagy, lipid metabolism, and renal fibrosis through mTOR, PDGFR-β, LKB1, and VEGF/VEGFR signaling pathways, thereby affecting the occurrence and development of membranous nephropathy.

A novel approach to rapid induction of remission in primary membranous nephropathy

Aim. То evaluate the effectiveness of a novel multi-targeted treatment approach including rituximab (RTX), cyclophosphamide (CPH) and steroids (S) to the induction of remission in patients with primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) compared to standard immunosuppression (IST). Materials and methods. An open-label prospective comparative study included 56 PMN patients (pts) with nephrotic syndrome (NS) and high serum level of antibodies to the phospholipase A2 receptor anti-PLA2R (mean age 5112 years, men 70%). We recorded demographic and clinical parameters at the time of kidney biopsy, data from light-optical and immunomorphological studies. All pts were on stable doses of the renin-angiotensin systems blockers. We compared the effectiveness of different treatments in the inductions of clinical and immunological remissions in pts who received experimental treatment with RTX, CPH and S (RTX+CPH+S group, n=14) and two control groups: high-dose RTX therapy (group RTX, n=12), cyclosporine and steroids (group CsA+S, n=30). Results. In the RTX+CPH+S group, remission was achieved in 100% of cases (of which complete remissions CR in 21.4%). The median time-to-remission (2.5 [1.0; 3.5] months) was significantly lower compared to both control groups: RTX (8.7 [6.6; 14.0] months, p=0.005) and CsA+S (12.4 [6.5; 19.9] months, p0.001). The cumulative incidence of clinical and immunological remissions was also significantly higher in the RTX+CPH+S group than in the control groups. These results were confirmed in comparative analyzes in the same treatment groups after propensity score matching. The cumulative incidence of clinical and immunological remissions in the RTX+CPH+S group was higher than in the combined group of patients who received other therapies (p0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events was low and did not differ between groups. Conclusion. The use of multi-targeted therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and steroids seems to be an effective approach for the rapid induction of PMN remission and prevention of NS complications.

Outcomes of primary membranous nephropathy based on serum anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies and glomerular phospholipase A2 receptor antigen status: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is associated with the anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2R) antibody in 70% of cases. Some anti-PLA2R-negative patients have the PLA2R antigen in renal tissue. This study examined the prognosis of patients with PMN according to their serum anti-PLA2R antibody (SAb) and glomerular PLA2R antigen (GAg) status.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PMN were included retrospectively. Patients were grouped according to their PLA2R status into the SAb−/GAg−, SAb−/GAg+, and SAb+/GAg + groups. Baseline data, renal biopsy results, treatment, and clinical data were compared among the groups. Cox univariable and multivariable analyses examined the factors related to complete remission (CR).

Results

A total of 114 patients were enrolled; 10 (9%) in the SAb−/GAg−, 23 (20%) in the SAb−/GAg+, and 81 (71%) in the SAb+/GAg+ groups. Cumulative CR rate showed a significant difference between the SAb−/GAg − and SAb+/GAg+ groups (log-rank p = 0.003). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that age (HR = 0.968; 95%CI = 0.946–0.990; p = 0.005), SAb+/GAg+ versus SAb−/GAg− (HR = 0.387; 95%CI = 0.190–0.788; p = 0.009), SAb−/GAg+ versus SAb−/GAg− (HR = 0.398; 95%CI = 0.169, 0.939; p = 0.035), total renal chronicity score ≥2 (HR = 0.461, 95%CI: 0.277–0.766, p = 0.003), and IgA deposition (HR = 2.596; 95%CI = 1.227–5.492; p = 0.013) were all independently related (p < 0.05) to CR.

Conclusions

The SAb and GAg status was an indicator of PMN prognosis. The patients with SAb−/GAg − had an increased likelihood of achieving CR than those with SAb−/GAg+ and SAb+/GAg+.

A Review of the Current Practice of Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy in China

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), a common pathological type of nephrotic syndrome, is one of the main causes of kidney failure. With an increasing prevalence, IMN has received considerable attention in China. Based on recent studies, we discuss advances in the diagnosis of IMN and the understanding of its genetic background. Although the pathogenesis of IMN remains unclear, our understanding has been substantially enhanced by the discovery of new antigens such as phospholipase A₂ receptor, thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A, exostosin1/exostosin2, neural epidermal growth factor-like 1 protein, neural cell adhesion molecule 1, semaphorin 3B, and factor H autoantibody. However, due to ethnic, environmental, economic, and lifestyle differences and other factors, a consensus has not yet been reached regarding IMN treatment. In view of the differences between Eastern and Western populations, in-depth clinical evaluations of biomarkers for IMN diagnosis are necessary. This review details the current treatment strategies for IMN in China, including renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, corticosteroid monotherapy, cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and traditional Chinese medicine, as well as biological preparations such as rituximab. In terms of management, the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines do not fully consider the characteristics of the Chinese population. Therefore, this review aims to present the current status of IMN diagnosis and treatment in Chinese patients, and includes a discussion of new approaches and remaining clinical challenges.

Rituximab for the management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab therapy in the management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN).

METHODS

After literature search, data from eligible studies were used to perform random-effects meta-analyses to estimate remission rates and changes in proteinuria at the latest follow-up after rituximab therapy. The outcomes were used for metaregression to identify the factors affecting the efficacy of rituximab.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis (602 patients; age 50 years [95% CI 46.8, 53.3]; 30% females [95% CI 23, 31]). Follow-up duration was 20.3 months [95% CI 17.1, 23.5]. Remission rate (67% [95% CI 61, 73]) was higher in studies with below average baseline proteinuria (76% [95% CI 61, 88]) than in studies with above average baseline proteinuria (61% [95% CI 54, 68]). The complete and partial remission rates were 26% [95% CI 20, 33] and 37% [95% CI 31, 43], respectively. Rituximab therapy significantly reduced proteinuria (mean difference between final and baseline values: - 4.90 g/day [95% CI - 6.18, - 3.63]; p < 0.00001; % reduction: 62% [95% CI 57, 68]). The reduction in proteinuria was inversely associated with baseline serum albumin levels (p = 0.021) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.00001) and was positively associated with baseline proteinuria (p < 0.00001). The remission rate or decrease in proteinuria was not significantly related to the anti-PLA₂R antibody status or previous immunosuppressant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab therapy in IMN patients can provide approximately 67% remission rate. The reduction in proteinuria was greater in patients who had higher baseline proteinuria.

Incidence of remission and relapse of proteinuria, end-stage kidney disease, mortality, and major outcomes in primary nephrotic syndrome: the Japan Nephrotic Syndrome Cohort Study (JNSCS)

Background

Despite recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy for patients with primary nephrotic syndrome, its effectiveness and safety have not been fully studied in recent nationwide real-world clinical data in Japan.

Methods

A 5-year cohort study, the Japan Nephrotic Syndrome Cohort Study, enrolled 374 patients with primary nephrotic syndrome in 55 hospitals in Japan, including 155, 148, 38, and 33 patients with minimal change disease (MCD), membranous nephropathy (MN), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and other glomerulonephritides, respectively. The incidence rates of remission and relapse of proteinuria, 50% and 100% increases in serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), all-cause mortality, and other major adverse outcomes were compared among glomerulonephritides using the Log-rank test. Incidence of hospitalization for infection, the most common cause of mortality, was compared using a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Immunosuppressive therapy was administered in 339 (90.6%) patients. The cumulative probabilities of complete remission within 3 years of the baseline visit was ≥ 0.75 in patients with MCD, MN, and FSGS (0.95, 0.77, and 0.79, respectively). Diabetes was the most common adverse events associated with immunosuppressive therapy (incidence rate, 71.0 per 1000 person-years). All-cause mortality (15.6 per 1000 person-years), mainly infection-related mortality (47.8%), was more common than ESKD (8.9 per 1000 person-years), especially in patients with MCD and MN. MCD was significantly associated with hospitalization for infection than MN.

Conclusions

Patients with MCD and MN had a higher mortality, especially infection-related mortality, than ESKD. Nephrologists should pay more attention to infections in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10157-020-01864-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy and cyclophosphamide combined with glucocorticoid in the treatment of adult primary membranous nephropathy: protocol of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains the leading cause of adult nephrotic syndrome. Immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide (CTX) is often successful in reducing proteinuria, but its use is associated with severe side effects. Tacrolimus (TAC) is effective in achieving complete remission (CR) in patients with IMN. However, whether it is as effective as CTX in inducing and maintaining complete or partial remission in these patients is unknown. This trial aims to test TAC monotherapy for its non-inferiority to CTX in inducing long-term remission of proteinuria.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven IMN with nephrotic syndrome will be randomized into a 12-month treatment period with oral TAC of 0.05-0.1 mg/kg/day for 6 months or with CTX + glucocorticoid. The efficacy of the treatment will be assessed by the remission status (based on changes in proteinuria) and relapse rate.

DISCUSSION

This study will test whether treatment with TAC monotherapy is superior to CTX with glucocorticoid in inducing long-term remission of proteinuria in patients with adult IMN. The role of serum anti-PLA2R antibodies in the early assessment of the response to therapy using different therapeutic regimens will also be clarified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR1800016140. Registered 12 June 2017. http://www.chictr.org.cn.

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults: KDIGO 2012, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine A are out, rituximab is the new normal

The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines for glomerulonephritis shed light on the complex world of glomerulonephritis therapy. However, they may no longer apply to idiopathic membranous nephropathy, as recently concluded by the KDIGO 2019 Working Group. This is due to the discovery of autoantibodies such as anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2R) that allow disease monitoring as well as to results from recent clinical trials, comparative cohort studies and meta-analyses. Perhaps the most disruptive of them is the Membranous Nephropathy Trial of Rituximab (MENTOR) trial comparing rituximab with cyclosporine A, which supports the superiority of rituximab in efficacy and safety. Furthermore, rituximab results compared favourably with the short-term results of classical clinical trials that supported the KDIGO 2012 recommendation of immunosuppressive cyclophosphamide-based regimens as first choice for active treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Thus, the KDIGO recommendations for cyclophosphamide-based regimens or calcineurin inhibitors as the first line of active treatment regimens for idiopathic membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome may no longer apply. By contrast, rituximab-based regimens or other B-cell-targeted therapies appear to represent the present and future of membranous nephropathy therapy.

Comparative efficacy of 13 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 13 types of immunosuppressive agents used to treat idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) in adults with nephrotic syndrome.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical trials, SinoMed, Chinese Biomedicine, CNKI, WanFang and Chongqing VIP Information databases were comprehensively searched until February 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of different immunosuppressive treatments in adult patients with IMN and nephrotic syndrome were included, and all included RCTs had a study-duration of at least 6 months.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed study quality. Standard pairwise meta-analysis was performed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model.

RESULTS

This study ultimately included 48 RCTs with 2736 patients and 13 immunosuppressive agents. The network meta-analysis results showed that most regimens, except for leflunomide (LEF), mizoribine (MZB) and steroids (STE), showed significantly higher probabilities of total remission (TR) when compared with non-immunosuppressive therapies (the control group),with risk ratios (RRs) of 2.71 (95% CI) 1.81 to 4.06)for tacrolimus+tripterygium wilfordii (TAC+TW), 2.16 (1.27 to 3.69) foradrenocorticotropic hormone, 2.02 (1.64 to 2.49) for TAC, 2.03 (1.13 to3.64) for azathioprine (AZA), 1.91 (1.46 to 2.50) for cyclosporine (CsA), 1.86 (1.44 to2.42) for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), 1.85 (1.52 to 2.25) for cyclophosphamide (CTX),1.81 (1.10 to 2.98) for rituximab (RIT), 1.80 (1.38 to 2.33) for TW, 1.72 (1.35 to 2.19) for chlorambucil. As for 24 hours UTP, the direct andindirect comparisons showed that AZA (standard mean difference (SMD), -1.02(95% CI -1.90 to -0.15)), CsA (SMD, -0.70 (95% CI -1.33 to -0.08)),CTX (SMD, -1.01 (95% CI -1.44 to -0.58)), MMF (SMD, -0.98 (95% CI -1.64 to -0.32)), MZB (SMD, -0.97 (95% CI -1.90 to-0.04]), TAC (SMD, -1.16 (95% CI -1.72 to -0.60)) and TAC+TW(SMD, -2.03 (95% CI -2.94 to -1.12)) could significantly superior thancontrol, except for chlorambucil, LEF, RIT and STE. Thechanges of serum creatinine (Scr) was not significantly different between eachtreatments of immunosuppressive agents and the control, except for STE whichhas the possibility of increasing Scr (SMD, 1.00 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.64)).Comparisons among all treatments of immunosuppressive agents showed nostatistical significance in the outcome of relapse. A drenocorticotropichormone (85.1%) showed the lowest probability of relapse under the cumulativeranking curve values among all immunosuppressants. Infection,gastrointestinal symptoms, and bone marrow suppression were the common adverseevents associated with most of the immunosuppressive therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that TAC+TW, TAC and CTX are superior to other immunosuppressive agents in terms of TR and 24 hours UTP. Moreover, they are all at risk of infection, gastrointestinal symptoms, and myelosuppression. Furthermore, TAC could increase the risk of glucose intolerance or new-onset diabetes mellitus. Conversely, STE alone, LEF and MZB seem to have little advantage in clinical treatment of IMN.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018094228.

Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy in an Asian population

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of cyclosporine A (CsA) in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and the safety of CsA in the treatment of IMN in Asians.

METHODS

We searched the Pubmed, China Biomedical Database, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and EMBASE (November 30, 2018) systematically to identify the appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and the safety of CsA and glucocorticoid (GC) treatment vs other immunosuppressants and GC on patients with IMN in Asian populations.

RESULTS

The CsA treated group entered complete remission (CR) faster (3 months) than a cyclophosphamide (CTX) group. While the CsA group lower inefficacy rates and higher total remission (TR, CR, or partial remission) than the CTX group in the total treatment (3 months, 6 months, and 12 months), it had a higher relapse rate. As for the CsA group vs the tacrolimus (TAC) group, the TAC had a significant effect in increasing the CR and the TR, with decreased no remission. With the therapeutic regimens of CsA+GC vs CTX+GC, the CsA exhibited better efficacy in lowering the proteinuria levels only at 12 months, not at 3 months or 6 months. Severe events like leucopenia, hemorrhagic cystitis, and alopecia were observed in the CTX group. Gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, and elevated blood pressure were reported only in the CsA group. Gastrointestinal syndrome, liver function lesion, happened more frequently in the CTX group, and elevated uric acid was more common in the CsA group.

CONCLUSIONS

In brief, the CsA has better efficacy than the CTX group in the Asian population, with mild adverse effects but higher relapse rates in short-term treatment.

Membranous Nephropathy and Anti-Podocytes Antibodies: Implications for the Diagnostic Workup and Disease Management

The discovery of circulating antibodies specific for native podocyte antigens has transformed the diagnostic workup and greatly improved management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN). In addition, their identification has clearly characterized iMN as a largely autoimmune disorder. Anti-PLA2R1 antibodies are detected in approximately 70% to 80% and anti-THSD7A antibodies in only 2% of adult patients with iMN. The presence of anti-THSD7A antibodies is associated with increased risk of malignancy. The assessment of PLA2R1 and THSD7A antigen expression in glomerular immune deposits has a better sensitivity than measurement of the corresponding autoantibodies. Therefore, in the presence of circulating anti-podocytes autoantibodies and/or enhanced expression of PLA2R1 and THSD7A antigens MN should be considered as primary MN (pMN). Anti-PLA2R1 or anti-THSD7A autoantibodies have been proposed as biomarkers of autoimmune disease activity and their blood levels should be regularly monitored in pMN to evaluate disease activity and predict outcomes. We propose a revised clinical workup flow for patients with MN that recommends assessment of kidney biopsy for PLA2R1 and THSD7A antigen expression, screening for circulating anti-podocytes antibodies, and assessment for secondary causes, especially cancer, in patients with THSD7A antibodies. Persistence of anti-podocyte antibodies for 6 months or their increase in association with nephrotic proteinuria should lead to the introduction of immunosuppressive therapies. Recent data have reported the efficacy and safety of new specific therapies targeting B cells (anti-CD20 antibodies, inhibitors of proteasome) in pMN which should lead to an update of currently outdated treatment guidelines.