Exercise testing criteria to diagnose lower extremity peripheral artery disease assessed by computed-tomography angiography

A retrospective analysis on optimal medical therapy for patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a French observational study

OBJECTIVE

Patients with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) should have an optimal management in terms of lipid goal [i.e. controlled LDL-cholesterol (LDLc)] and medical treatment (triple therapy with an antiplatelet agent, a statin and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a angiotensin-receptor antagonist). Prevalence of LEAD patients with a LDLc < 0.55 g/l is unknown. Aims of this study were to: (i) describe the prevalence of patients with a LDLc < 0.55 g/l, (ii) describe the prevalence of patients with an optimal medical treatment; (iii) compare this management between patients with a vascular surgery history and those without a vascular surgery history; and (iv) evaluate the number of patients eligible for new lipid-lowering therapies according to FOURIER and REDUCE-IT criteria.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, prevalence is expressed as numbers and percentages. Comparison of the number of well managed patients between LEAD patients with a vascular surgery history and those without was performed. Number of patients who would be eligible for FOURIER and REDUCE-IT studies were calculated.

RESULTS

Among the LEAD patients included in the analysis (n = 225), only 12.4% (n = 28) had a LDLc < 0.55 g/L. The prevalence of patients who received the optimal medical treatment was 50.7% (n = 114). There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of patients with and without vascular surgery history achieving the LDLc goal (n = 9 (10.6%) vs. n = 19 (13.6%); p = not significant). Ninety-three patients (46.0%) would be eligible for EVOLOCUMAB treatment according to the Fourier study design whereas 17 patients (8.4%) would be eligible for treatment with ICOSAPENT ETHYL according to the REDUCE-IT study design.

CONCLUSION

A majority of LEAD patients did not reach the LDLc goals. LEAD patients with a vascular surgery history did not experience a better management whereas they had a more consistent follow-up.

An unfavorable dietary pattern is associated with symptomatic peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diet has an essential role in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention by modulating various cardiovascular risk factors. The need to have easily useable tools seems essential to facilitate the daily practice of clinicians in order to propose the most optimal management of their patients' diet. The aim of this study was to compare the diet assessed with a simple food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) between patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) and healthy subjects.

MATERIALS AND RESULTS

In this ancillary study (ELECTRO-PAD study), we included symptomatic PAD patients and healthy participants. All participants filled a FFQ previously validated called Cardiovascular-Dietary-Questionnaire 2 (CDQ-2). CDQ-2 allows the calculation of different scores: global food score, saturated fatty acids score (SFA), unsaturated fatty acids score (UFA), fruit and vegetable score. The higher the score, the better the diet. We compared the different scores between PAD patients and healthy participants. We included 37 PAD patients and 40 healthy subjects. Mean global score was significantly lower in PAD patients compared to the healthy participants (5.35 ± 7.65 vs 10.60 ± 5.81; p = 0.0011). Similarly, the sub-scores concerning unsaturated fatty acids and fruits-vegetables were significantly lower in PAD patients (p < 0.010). Only the sub-score concerning saturated fatty acids was not significantly different (p = 0.8803) between PAD patients and healthy participants.

CONCLUSION

CDQ-2 highlights that PAD patients have an unfavorable diet compared with healthy participants. CDQ-2 is a tool of interest to help the clinicians for dietary advice of PAD patients.

Test-retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change in Exercise Oximetry in Claudicants

BACKGROUND

Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (Exercise-TcPO2) can be used to diagnose Lower Extremity Artery Disease (LEAD) and allows the quantification of limb ischemia during exercise on treadmill. Exercise-TcPO2 test-retest reliability in patients with LEAD and severe walking impairment is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) of exercise-TcPO2 in patients with claudication.

METHODS

Data were collected from patients that performed 2 treadmill tests within a 1-month interval. Delta from Rest of Oxygen Pressure (DROP) values were measured at both buttocks (proximal) and both calves (distal). Test-retest reproducibility was assessed by recording transcutaneous oximetry measurements twice and expressed as SEM and intra-class correlation coefficients. MDC was calculated using the formula MDC = SEM x 1.96 x √ 2.

RESULTS

Twenty eight LEAD patients (61 ± 9 years old) were included. Intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.66 [0.50, 0.79] and 0.65 [0.49, 0.79] for the proximal and distal levels, respectively. The SEM of DROP at the proximal and distal levels were 7 [6, 9] mm Hg and 9 [8, 11] mm Hg, respectively. The SEM for all (proximal and distal) DROP values was 8 [7, 10] mm Hg and the MDC of DROP was 23 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise-TcPO2 with measurement of DROP values has a moderate test-retest reliability in LEAD patients with a maximal walking distance ≤ 300m. For an individual, an improvement or deterioration in DROP of ≥ 23 mm Hg after an intervention would be required to be 95% confident that the change is significant. It should be considered in evaluating the impact of treatment in patients with claudication.

Non-Coronary Atherosclerotic Arterial Disease: Where Are We Now?

Lower extremity peripheral artery and upper extremity artery disease are significant vascular conditions with distinct clinical presentations and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The lower extremity peripheral artery is associated with worse major adverse cardiovascular events compared with coronary artery disease, but often remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Upper extremity artery disease encompasses a range of clinical presentations resulting from atherosclerosis and other obstructive lesions in arteries such as the subclavian artery and brachiocephalic trunk. While atherosclerosis is a common cause, non-atherosclerotic factors can also influence distal lesions. This review aims to synthesize existing knowledge on both conditions, encompassing risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options. Improved awareness and early intervention can mitigate complications and enhance patient outcomes for lower extremity peripheral artery and upper extremity artery disease.

Use of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History questionnaire to detect maximal walking distance equal to or lower than 250 m in patients with lower extremity arterial disease

Objective

The objective was to assess the accuracy and optimal threshold of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire in identifying patients with a maximal walking distance (MWD) below or equal to 250 m.

Methods

This retrospective study screened 388 consecutive patients with suspected symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). Collected data included the patient's history, resting ankle-brachial index, WIQ, and WELCH. MWD was assessed with a treadmill test at 2 mph (3.2 km/h) with a 10% grade. An optimized threshold for detection of MWD ≤ 250 m was determined for each questionnaire via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Subsequently, multivariate analysis was performed to build a new simple score to detect MWD ≤ 250 m.

Results

The study included 297 patients (63 ± 10 years old). With a threshold of ≤ 64%, the WIQ predicted MWD ≤ 250 m with an accuracy of 71.4% (66.2, 76.5%). With a threshold of ≤ 22, the WELCH predicted a treadmill walking distance of ≤ 250 m with an accuracy of 68.7% (63.4, 74.0%). A new score with only four "yes or no" questions had an accuracy of 71.4% (66.3, 76.6%). Items on this new score consisted of the level of difficulty of walking 1 block, declared maximum walking distance, usual walking speed, and maximum duration of slow walking.

Conclusion

A WIQ score ≤ 64% and a WELCH score ≤ 22 help to predict a walking distance of ≤ 250 m in a treadmill test at 2 mph (3.2 km/h) with a 10% grade. A 4-item score could be used for rapid evaluation of walking distance among patients with LEAD, but the validity of this 4-item score requires further confirmation studies.

A Multicenter, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Calf Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Program on Walking Performance in Peripheral Artery Disease: The ELECTRO-PAD Study Protocol

This paper describes a currently on-going multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of calf neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on changes in maximal walking distance in people with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD), compared with a non-intervention control-group. This study (NCT03795103) encompasses five participating centers in France. PAD participants with a predominant claudication at the calf level and a maximal treadmill walking distance ≤300 m are randomized into one of the two groups: NMES group or Control group. The NMES program consists of a 12-week program of electrical stimulations at the calf-muscle level. The primary outcome of the study is the change in maximal treadmill walking distance at 12 weeks. Main secondary outcomes include changes in the pain-free treadmill walking distance; 6 min total walking distance; global positioning system (GPS)-measured outdoor walking capacity; daily physical activity level by accelerometry; self-reported walking impairment; self-reported quality of life; ankle-brachial index; and skin microvascular function, both at the forearm and calf levels. Recruitment started in September 2019 and data collection is expected to end in November 2022.

Simplification of ankle-brachial-index measurement using Doppler-waveform classification in symptomatic patients suspected of lower extremity artery disease

Objectives

Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is commonly used for screening lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) according to the international guidelines. Arterial Doppler waveform recordings is a tool to diagnose and assess PAD severity. We hypothesized that ABI measurement could be simplified by measuring only the pressure where the best arterial flow is recorded. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between ABI performed according to the American Heart Association guidelines (AHA-ABI) and ABI measured according to best arterial waveform (FLOW-ABI).

Design

This was a monocentric cross-sectional study.

Methods

We included patients with exertional limb symptoms suspected of PAD. Arterial Doppler waveforms and ABI were acquired on both lower extremities at the pedis and tibial posterior arteries. Each arterial waveform was classified using the Saint-Bonnet classification. Concordances were analyzed with the kappa coefficient (confidence interval 95%). Exercise PAD study was registered n° NCT03186391.

Results

In total, one hundred and eighty-eight patients (62+/−12 years and 26.8+/−4.5 kg/m²) with exertional limb symptoms were included from May 2016 to June 2019. On each extremity, FLOW-ABI had excellent concordance for the diagnosis of PAD with the AHA-ABI with a kappa of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.99) in the right extremity and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.97) in the left extremity.

Conclusion

There is almost perfect concordance between AHA-ABI and FLOW-ABI. Thus, ABI can be simplified into five pressure measurements instead of seven in patient suspected of PAD with exertional limb symptoms. The question remains in patients with chronic limb ischemia.

Combination of Exercise Testing Criteria to Diagnose Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

Objectives: Nothing is known about the interest of the combination of exercise tests to diagnose Lower-extremity Peripheral Artery Disease (LEPAD). The aim of this study was to assess if combining exercise testing criteria [post-exercise Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) + exercise-oximetry (exercise-TcPO2)] improves the detection of lower limbs arterial stenoses as compared with post-exercise ABI using American Heart Association (AHA) criteria, or exercise-TcPO2 alone. Material and Methods: In a prospective monocentric study, consecutive patients with exertional-limb pain and normal resting-ABI referred to our vascular center (Rennes, France) were assessed from May 2016 to February 2018. All included patients had a computed tomography angiography (CTA), a resting-ABI, a post-exercise ABI and an exercise-TcPO2. AHA post-exercise criteria, new validated post-exercise criteria (post-exercise ABI decrease ≥18.5%, post-exercise ABI decrease <0.90), and Delta from Rest of Oxygen Pressure (Total-DROP) ≤-15mmHg (criterion for exercise-TcPO2) were used to diagnose arterial stenoses ≥50%. For the different combinations of exercise testing criteria, sensitivity or specificity or accuracies were compared with McNemar's test. Results: Fifty-six patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years old and 84% men) were included. The sensitivity of the combination of exercise testing criteria (post-exercise ABI decrease ≥18.5%, or post-exercise ABI decrease <0.90 or a Total-DROP ≤-15mmHg) was significantly higher (sensitivity = 81% [95% CI, 71-92]) than using only one exercise test (post-exercise AHA criteria (sensitivity = 57% [43-70]) or exercise-TcPO2 alone (sensitivity = 59% [45-72]). Conclusions: Combination of post-exercise ABI with Exercise-TcPO2 criteria shows better sensitivity to diagnose arterial stenoses compared with the AHA post-exercise criteria alone or Exercise-TcPO2 criteria used alone. A trend of a better accuracy of this combined strategy was observed but an external validation should be performed to confirm this diagnostic strategy.

Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Contemporary Epidemiology, Management Gaps, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects >230 million adults worldwide and is associated with increased risk of various adverse clinical outcomes (other cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart disease and stroke and leg outcomes such as amputation). Despite its prevalence and clinical importance, PAD has been historically underappreciated by health care professionals and patients. This underappreciation seems multifactorial (eg, limited availability of the first-line diagnostic test, the ankle-brachial index, in clinics; incorrect perceptions that a leg vascular disease is not fatal and that the diagnosis of PAD would not necessarily change clinical practice). In the past several years, a body of evidence has indicated that these perceptions are incorrect. Several studies have consistently demonstrated that many patients with PAD are not receiving evidence-based therapies. Thus, this scientific statement provides an update for health care professionals regarding contemporary epidemiology (eg, prevalence, temporal trends, risk factors, and complications) of PAD, the present status of diagnosis (physiological tests and imaging modalities), and the major gaps in the management of PAD (eg, medications, exercise therapy, and revascularization). The statement also lists key gaps in research, clinical practice, and implementation related to PAD. Orchestrated efforts among different parties (eg, health care providers, researchers, expert organizations, and health care organizations) will be needed to increase the awareness and understanding of PAD and improve the diagnostic approaches, management, and prognosis of PAD.

"Should I stay or should I go now?" Recovery time effect on walking capacity in symptomatic peripheral artery disease

The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of recovery time on walking capacity (WC) throughout repeated maximal walking bouts in symptomatic lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). The effect of recovery time on WC (maximal walking time) was determined in 21 participants with PAD in three experimental conditions [recovery time from 0.5 to 9.5 min + a self-selected recovery time (SSRT)]: 1) 11 repeated sequences of two treadmill walking bouts (TW-ISO); 2) a single sequence of seven treadmill walking bouts (TW-CONS); 3) a single sequence of seven outdoor walking bouts (OW-CONS). Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure changes were continuously recorded as an indirect measure of ischemia. An individual recovery time (IRT) beyond which WC did not substantially increased was determined in participants with a logarithmic fit. At the group level, mixed models showed a significant effect (P < 0.001) of recovery time on WC restoration. At the participant level, strong logarithmic relationships were found (median significant R² ≥ 0.78). The median SSRT corresponded to a median work-to-rest ratio >1:1 (i.e., a lower recovery time in view of the corresponding previous walking time) and was related to unrecovered ischemia and a WC restoration level of <80%. A median work-to-rest ratio of ≤1:2 allowed full recovery of ischemia and full restoration of WC. The IRT ratio was between 1:1 and 1:2 and corresponded to the start of recovery from ischemia. Recovery time affects the restoration level of WC during repeated maximal walking bouts in symptomatic PAD. Meaningful variations in WC restoration were related to specific levels of work-to-rest ratios.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrated that there is a significant and mostly logarithmic effect of recovery time on walking capacity in people with symptomatic PAD. This study revealed that a median work-to-rest ratio >1:1 leads to the resumption of walking with unrecovered ischemia and precludes the restoration of full walking capacity, whereas a work-to-rest ratio ≤1:2 allowed walking capacity to fully be restored.

Arterial Doppler Waveforms Are Independently Associated With Maximal Walking Distance in Suspected Peripheral Artery Disease Patients

Objective: Arterial Doppler waveform recordings are commonly used to assess lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) severity. However, little is known about the relationship between arterial Doppler waveform profiles and patients' walking capacity. The purpose of this study was to assess whether arterial Doppler waveforms are independently associated with maximal walking distance (MWD) in patients experiencing exertional limb symptoms. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included suspected LEAD patients experiencing exertional limb symptoms. In both lower extremities, arterial Doppler waveforms and ankle-brachial index (ABI) values were obtained from the pedis and tibial posterior arteries. Each arterial flow measurement was ranked using the Saint-Bonnet classification system. Treadmill stress testing (3.2 km/h, 10% slope) coupled with exercise oximetry (Exercise-TcPO2) were used to determine MWD. Delta from rest oxygen pressure (DROP) was calculated. Following treadmill stress testing, post-exercise ABI values were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the clinical variables associated with MWD. Results: 186 patients experiencing exertional limb symptoms (62 ± 12 years and 26.8 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were included between May 2016 and June 2019. Median [25th; 75th] treadmill MWD was 235 [125;500]m. Better arterial Doppler waveforms were associated with better walking distance (p = 0.0012). Whereas, median MWD was 524 [185;525]m in the group that yielded the best Doppler waveforms, it was 182 [125,305]m in the group with the poorest Doppler waveforms (p = 0.0012). MWD was significantly better (p = 0.006) in the patients with the best ABIs. However, arterial Doppler waveforms alone were significantly associated with MWD (p = 0.0009) in the multivariate model. When exercise variables (post-exercise ABI or DROP) were incorporated into the multivariate model, these were the only variables to be associated with MWD. Conclusion: Of the various clinical parameters at rest, Doppler flow waveform profiles were associated with MWD in suspected LEAD patients. A stronger link was however found between exercise variables and MWD.

Discordance of peripheral artery disease diagnosis using exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement and post-exercise ankle-brachial index

In patients with exertional limb symptoms and normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) at rest, exercise testing can be used to diagnose lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). Post-exercise ABI decrease or Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (Exercise-TcPO2) can be used to diagnose LEAD. Objectives were (i) to assess the agreement between both methods (ii) to define the variables associated with the discordance, and (iii) to present results of healthy subjects. In this prospective cross-sectional study, patients with exertional limb symptoms and normal rest ABI were consecutively included. ABI was measured at rest and after standardized exercise protocol as well as Exercise-TcPO2. A kappa coefficient with a 95% confidence interval was used to assess the agreement between the two methods. Logistic regression analysis was performed to outline variables potentially responsible for discordance. Ninety-six patients were included. The agreement between the tests was weak with a k value of 0.23 [0.04–0.41]. Logistic regression analysis found that a medical history of lower extremity arterial stenting (odds ratio 5.85[1.68–20.44]) and age (odds ratio 1.06[1.01–1.11]) were the main cause of discordance. This study suggests that post-exercise ABI and Exercise-TcPO2 cannot be used interchangeably for the diagnosis of LEAD in patients with exertional symptoms and normal rest ABI.