1
|
Riley AG, Voehler D, Mitrovich R, Carias C, Ollendorf DA, Nelson KL, Synnott PG, Eiden AL. Documenting the Full Value of Vaccination: A Systematic Review of Value Frameworks. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02356-8. [PMID: 38729562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Economic evaluations of vaccination may not fully account for nonhealth patient impacts on families, communities, and society (ie, broader value elements). Omission of broader value elements may reflect a lack of established measurement methodology, lack of agreement over which value elements to include in economic evaluations, and a lack of consensus on whether the value elements included should vary by vaccination type or condition. We conducted a systematic review of value frameworks to identify broader value elements and measurement guidance that may be useful for capturing the full value of vaccination. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the gray literature to identify value frameworks for all health interventions, and we extracted information on each framework's context, value elements, and any available guidance on how these elements should be measured. We used descriptive statistics to analyze and compare the prevalence of broader value elements in vaccination value frameworks and other healthcare-related value frameworks. RESULTS Our search identified 62 value frameworks that met inclusion criteria, 9 of which were vaccination specific. Although vaccination frameworks included several broader value elements, such as reduced transmissibility and public health benefits, the elements were represented inconsistently across the frameworks. Vaccination frameworks omitted several value elements included in nonvaccination-specific frameworks, including dosing and administration complexity and affordability. In addition, guidance for measuring broader value elements was underdeveloped. CONCLUSIONS Future efforts should further evaluate inclusion of broader value elements in economic evaluations of vaccination and develop standards for their subsequent measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail G Riley
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Dominic Voehler
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Patricia G Synnott
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Afonso S, Vieira ACL, Pereira C, Oliveira MD. Advancing hospital-based health technology assessment: evaluating genomic panel contracting strategies for blood tumors through a multimethodology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e76. [PMID: 38130159 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323002751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The adoption of genomic technologies in the context of hospital-based health technology assessment presents multiple practical and organizational challenges. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assist the Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil (IPO Lisboa) decision makers in analyzing which acute myeloid leukemia (AML) genomic panel contracting strategies had the highest value-for-money. METHODS A tailored, three-step approach was developed, which included: mapping clinical pathways of AML patients, building a multicriteria value model using the MACBETH approach to evaluate each genomic testing contracting strategy, and estimating the cost of each strategy through Monte Carlo simulation modeling. The value-for-money of three contracting strategies - "Standard of care (S1)," "FoundationOne Heme test (S2)," and "New diagnostic test infrastructure (S3)" - was then analyzed through strategy landscape and value-for-money graphs. RESULTS Implementing a larger gene panel (S2) and investing in a new diagnostic test infrastructure (S3) were shown to generate extra value, but also to entail extra costs in comparison with the standard of care, with the extra value being explained by making available additional genetic information that enables more personalized treatment and patient monitoring (S2 and S3), access to a broader range of clinical trials (S2), and more complete databases to potentiate research (S3). CONCLUSION The proposed multimethodology provided IPO Lisboa decision makers with comprehensive and insightful information regarding each strategy's value-for-money, enabling an informed discussion on whether to move from the current Strategy S1 to other competing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Afonso
- CEGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana C L Vieira
- CEGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carla Pereira
- Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil (IPO Lisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mónica D Oliveira
- CEGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences and i4HB - Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
TRAVERSI DEBORAH, CALABRÒ GIOVANNAELISA, FRANCESE CORINNE, FRANCHITTI ELENA, PULLIERO ALESSANDRA, SPATERA PAOLA, IZZOTTI ALBERTO, VENTURA CARLADELLA, LAI ALESSIA, BERGNA ANNALISA, GALLI MASSIMO, ZEHENDER GIANGUGLIELMO, TAMBURRO MANUELA, LOMBARDI ADELE, SALZO ANGELO, DE DONA ROBERTA, D’AMICO ANTONIO, VICCIONE VITTORIO, RIPABELLI GIANCARLO, BACCOLINI VALENTINA, MIGLIARA GIUSEPPE, PITINI ERICA, MARZUILLO CAROLINA, DE VITO CORRADO, PASTORINO ROBERTA, VILLARI PAOLO, BOCCIA STEFANIA. [Genomics in Public Health Scientific evidence and prospects for integration in the prevention practice]. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2023; 63:E1-E29. [PMID: 36818497 PMCID: PMC9910509 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.3s2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- DEBORAH TRAVERSI
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Università di Torino, Torino, Italia
| | - GIOVANNA ELISA CALABRÒ
- Sezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - CORINNE FRANCESE
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Università di Torino, Torino, Italia
| | - ELENA FRANCHITTI
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Università di Torino, Torino, Italia
| | | | - PAOLA SPATERA
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Genova, Genova, Italia
| | - ALBERTO IZZOTTI
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Università di Genova, Genova, Italia
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italia
| | - CARLA DELLA VENTURA
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università di Milano, Milano, Italia
- EpiSoMi CRC-Centro di Ricerca Coordinato, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia
| | - ALESSIA LAI
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università di Milano, Milano, Italia
- EpiSoMi CRC-Centro di Ricerca Coordinato, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia
| | - ANNALISA BERGNA
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università di Milano, Milano, Italia
- EpiSoMi CRC-Centro di Ricerca Coordinato, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia
| | - MASSIMO GALLI
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università di Milano, Milano, Italia
| | - GIANGUGLIELMO ZEHENDER
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università di Milano, Milano, Italia
- EpiSoMi CRC-Centro di Ricerca Coordinato, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia
| | - MANUELA TAMBURRO
- Dipartimento di Medicina e di Scienze della Salute “Vincenzo Tiberio”, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
| | - ADELE LOMBARDI
- Dipartimento di Medicina e di Scienze della Salute “Vincenzo Tiberio”, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
| | - ANGELO SALZO
- Azienda Sanitaria Regionale del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
| | - ROBERTA DE DONA
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
| | - ANTONIO D’AMICO
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
| | - VITTORIO VICCIONE
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
| | - GIANCARLO RIPABELLI
- Dipartimento di Medicina e di Scienze della Salute “Vincenzo Tiberio”, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
- Azienda Sanitaria Regionale del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italia
| | - VALENTINA BACCOLINI
- Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italia
| | - GIUSEPPE MIGLIARA
- Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italia
| | | | - CAROLINA MARZUILLO
- Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italia
| | - CORRADO DE VITO
- Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italia
| | - ROBERTA PASTORINO
- Sezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - PAOLO VILLARI
- Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italia
| | - STEFANIA BOCCIA
- Sezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aguilera-Cobos L, García-Sanz P, Rosario-Lozano MP, Claros MG, Blasco-Amaro JA. An innovative framework to determine the implementation level of personalized medicine: A systematic review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1039688. [PMID: 36817923 PMCID: PMC9936069 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1039688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Personalized medicine (PM) is now the new frontier in patient care. The application of this new paradigm extends to various pathologies and different patient care phases, such as diagnosis and treatment. Translating biotechnological advances to clinical routine means adapting health services at all levels is necessary. Purpose This article aims to identify the elements for devising a framework that will allow the level of PM implementation in the country under study to be quantitatively and qualitatively assessed and that can be used as a guideline for future implementation plans. Methods A systematic review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The research question was: What are the domains for determining the level of implementation of PM at the national level? The domains for assessing the degree of PM implementation, which would form the framework, were established. Results 19 full-text studies that met the inclusion criteria were peer-selected in the systematic review. From all the studies that were included, 37 elements-encompassed in 11 domains-were extracted for determining the degree of PM implementation. These domains and their constituent elements comprise the qualitative and quantitative assessment framework presented herein. Each of the elements can be assessed individually. On the other hand, the domains were standardized to all have the same weight in an overall assessment. Conclusions A framework has been developed that takes a multi-factorial approach to determine the degree of implementation of PM at the national level. This framework could also be used to rank countries and their implementation strategies according to the score they receive in the application of the latter. It could also be used as a guide for developing future national PM implementation strategies. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022338611, Identifier: CRD42022338611.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorena Aguilera-Cobos
- Health Technology Assessment Area-AETSA, Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health-FPS, Seville, Spain,Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain,*Correspondence: Lorena Aguilera-Cobos ✉
| | - Patricia García-Sanz
- Health Technology Assessment Area-AETSA, Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health-FPS, Seville, Spain,Patricia García-Sanz ✉
| | - María Piedad Rosario-Lozano
- Health Technology Assessment Area-AETSA, Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health-FPS, Seville, Spain
| | - M. Gonzalo Claros
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain,Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain,Institute for Mediterranean and Subtropical Horticulture “La Mayora”, Universidad de Málaga-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Málaga, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio Blasco-Amaro
- Health Technology Assessment Area-AETSA, Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health-FPS, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Galluzzi S, Pievani M, Zanetti O, Benussi L, Frisoni GB, Di Maria E. Disclosure of Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease to Cognitively Healthy Individuals-From Current Practice towards a Personalised Medicine Scenario. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123177. [PMID: 36551936 PMCID: PMC9775740 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a genetically complex disorder. In addition to the relatively small number of pathogenic variants causing autosomal dominant AD, many others have been associated with the much more common sporadic form. The E4 allele of the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is the first discovered genetic risk factor for AD. In addition, more than 70 genetic risk loci contributing to AD have been identified. Current guidelines do not recommend AD susceptibility genetic testing in cognitively healthy adults because the implications for clinical care are limited. However, secondary prevention clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies enrol individuals based on genetic criteria, and participants are often informed of APOE testing results. Moreover, the availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing allows individuals to learn their own AD genetic risk profile without medical supervision. A number of research protocols for AD susceptibility genetic testing have been proposed. In Italy, disclosure processes and protocols beyond those developed for inherited dementia have not been established yet. We reviewed the literature on the current practice and clinical issues related to disclosing AD genetic risk to cognitively healthy individuals and provide suggestions that may help to develop specific guidelines at the national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Galluzzi
- Laboratory Alzheimer’s Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | - Michela Pievani
- Laboratory Alzheimer’s Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | - Orazio Zanetti
- Memory Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | - Luisa Benussi
- Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emilio Di Maria
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- University Unit of Medical Genetics, Galliera Hospital, 16128 Genoa, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mighton C, Shickh S, Aguda V, Krishnapillai S, Adi-Wauran E, Bombard Y. From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening. Front Genet 2022; 13:893832. [PMID: 36353115 PMCID: PMC9637971 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic medicine is expanding from a focus on diagnosis at the patient level to prevention at the population level given the ongoing under-ascertainment of high-risk and actionable genetic conditions using current strategies, particularly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch Syndrome (LS) and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The availability of large-scale next-generation sequencing strategies and preventive options for these conditions makes it increasingly feasible to screen pre-symptomatic individuals through public health-based approaches, rather than restricting testing to high-risk groups. This raises anew, and with urgency, questions about the limits of screening as well as the moral authority and capacity to screen for genetic conditions at a population level. We aimed to answer some of these critical questions by using the WHO Wilson and Jungner criteria to guide a synthesis of current evidence on population genomic screening for HBOC, LS, and FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vernie Aguda
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Suvetha Krishnapillai
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ella Adi-Wauran
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pitini E, Migliara G, Baccolini V, Isonne C, Mazzalai E, Turatto F, Salerno C, Pagano F, Menzano MT, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, Villari P. Managing the introduction of genomic applications into the National Health Service: A special challenge for health technology assessment in Italy. Front Public Health 2022; 10:932093. [PMID: 36033790 PMCID: PMC9399489 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.932093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the rapid proliferation of genomic tests for use in clinical practice has prompted healthcare systems to use a health technology assessment (HTA) approach to distinguish valuable from unwarranted applications. In this study, we narratively review the Italian HTA mechanisms for medical devices (MDs), both at the national and regional levels, and discuss the opportunity and benefits of extending them to genomic technologies, for which a dedicated assessment path was advocated by the National Plan for Public Health Genomics in 2017. We found that the National Health Technology Assessment Program for MDs, completed in 2019, had developed a structured pathway for the HTA of MDs; it established a hub-and-spoke structure, run by a governmental institution, and put in place transparent methodological procedures to cover all four HTA phases (i.e., proposal and prioritization, assessment, appraisal, and dissemination). However, several factors have hindered its adoption, and the regions are at different stages of its implementation. For these reasons, efforts should be made to ensure its effective deployment, both at national and regional levels. In addition, we argue that to harmonize the institutional roles and methodological procedures adopted, the time has come to concentrate resources on a single pathway for the assessment of all technologies that include both MDs and genomic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Pitini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy,*Correspondence: Erica Pitini
| | - Giuseppe Migliara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Isonne
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Mazzalai
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Turatto
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carla Salerno
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Pagano
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Menzano
- Italian Ministry of Health, General Directorate for Health Prevention, Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown HL, Sherburn IA, Gaff C, Taylor N, Best S. Structured approaches to implementation of clinical genomics: A scoping review. Genet Med 2022; 24:1415-1424. [PMID: 35442192 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the extent to which structured approaches to implementation of clinical genomics, proposed or adapted, are informed by evidence. METHODS A systematic approach was used to identify peer-reviewed articles and gray literature to report on 4 research questions: 1. What structured approaches have been proposed to support implementation? 2. To what extent are the structured approaches informed by evidence? 3. How have structured approaches been deployed in the genomic setting? 4. What are the intended outcomes of the structured approaches? RESULTS A total of 30 unique structured approaches to implementation were reported across 23 peer-reviewed publications and 11 gray literature articles. Most approaches were process models, applied in the preadoption implementation phase, focusing on a "service" outcome. Key findings included a lack of implementation science theory informing the development/implementation of newly designed structured approaches in the genomic setting and a lack of measures to assess implementation effectiveness. CONCLUSION This scoping review identified a significant number of structured approaches developed to inform the implementation of genomic medicine into clinical practice, with limited use of implementation science to support the process. We recommend the use of existing implementation science theory and the expertise of implementation scientists to inform the design of genomic programs being implemented into clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L Brown
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Isabella A Sherburn
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pitini E, Baccolini V, Migliara G, Isonne C, Sindoni A, Mazzalai E, Turatto F, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, Villari P. Time to Align: A Call for Consensus on the Assessment of Genetic Testing. Front Public Health 2021; 9:807695. [PMID: 34938716 PMCID: PMC8685239 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.807695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we updated our 2018 systematic review aimed to identify and compare ad hoc designed frameworks for genetic testing evaluation. Overall, we identified 30 frameworks (29 in the first systematic review and one in the update): they were mainly based on the ACCE model, whereas a minority were adjustments of the more traditional Health Technology Assessment (HTA) approach. After discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the retrieved frameworks, this perspective calls for consensus on the assessment of genetic testing. In line with the recent European recommendations that encouraged the generation of comparable evidence across Member States, we believe that the time has come to align all the ideas that have emerged over the last few decades and find a sustainable and sharable tool for the evaluation of genetic and genomic applications. Therefore, we suggest stopping the evaluation of such technologies using ad hoc strategies-affected by validation, implementation, and adoption issues-and we propose to use a general HTA approach, particularly the European reference tool for the assessment of health technologies, the EUnetHTA HTA core model, that is built on solid theoretical and methodological principles and provides a comprehensive assessment of the technologies value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Pitini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Migliara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Isonne
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sindoni
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Mazzalai
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Turatto
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dive L, Archibald AD, Newson AJ. Ethical considerations in gene selection for reproductive carrier screening. Hum Genet 2021; 141:1003-1012. [PMID: 34426854 PMCID: PMC9160090 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02341-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Genetic carrier screening for reproductive purposes has existed for half a century. It was originally offered to particular ethnic groups with a higher prevalence of certain severe recessive or X-linked genetic conditions, or (as carrier testing) to those with a family history of a particular genetic condition. Commercial providers are increasingly offering carrier screening on a user-pays basis. Some countries are also trialing or offering public reproductive genetic carrier screening with whole populations, rather than only to those known to have a higher chance of having a child with an inherited genetic condition. Such programs broaden the ethical and practical challenges that arise in clinical carrier testing. In this paper we consider three aspects of selecting genes for population reproductive genetic carrier screening panels that give rise to important ethical considerations: severity, variable penetrance and expressivity, and scalability; we also draw on three exemplar genes to illustrate the ethical issues raised: CFTR, GALT and SERPINA1. We argue that such issues are important to attend to at the point of gene selection for RGCS. These factors warrant a cautious approach to screening panel design, one that takes into account the likely value of the information generated by screening and the feasibility of implementation in large and diverse populations. Given the highly complex and uncertain nature of some genetic variants, careful consideration needs to be given to the balance between delivering potentially burdensome or harmful information, and providing valuable information to inform reproductive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Dive
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Level 1, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Alison Dalton Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Level 1, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
St John A, O'Kane M, Christenson R, Jülicher P, Oellerich M, Price CP. Implementation of medical tests in a Value-Based healthcare environment: A framework for delivering value. Clin Chim Acta 2021; 521:90-96. [PMID: 34242637 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Significant variation in the utilisation of medical tests is known to have an adverse impact on health outcomes and analysis of this variation is an important tool for quality assurance in healthcare. The introduction of a new medical test into a care pathway requires two distinct processes, termed adoption and implementation. One cause of the unwarranted variation in the use of medical tests is poor adoption and implementation. Adoption is the decision to acquire a technology and make it available to the users and is supported with evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness. Implementation is delivering the benefits promised in the business case, based on evidence of the impact of a test on each stakeholder involved in delivering the care pathway. The business case will have identified the benefits delivered to all stakeholders, as set out in a value proposition, and according to the quality domains typically addressed in quality improvement, namely clinical, process and structure (resource utilisation) outcomes. The outcome measures extend beyond those of clinical and cost effectiveness required for adoption. We describe an implementation framework which is designed to document the changes to the care pathway, the resource inputs and the expected outcomes with associated quality metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maurice O'Kane
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, N. Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Christenson
- Laboratories of Pathology, University of Maryland Medical Centre, 22 South Green Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Paul Jülicher
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Medical Affairs, Abbott Laboratories, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medicine Göttingen (UMG), Kreuzbergring 36, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christopher P Price
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dive L, Newson AJ. Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: From the Clinic to the Population. Public Health Ethics 2021; 14:202-217. [PMID: 34650621 PMCID: PMC8510688 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phab017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RCS) is increasingly being offered more widely, including to people with no family history or otherwise elevated chance of having a baby with a genetic condition. There are valid reasons to reject a prevention-focused public health ethics approach to such screening programs. Rejecting the prevention paradigm in this context has led to an emphasis on more individually-focused values of freedom of choice and fostering reproductive autonomy in RCS. We argue, however, that population-wide RCS has sufficient features in common with other public health screening programs that it becomes important also to attend to its public health implications. Not doing so constitutes a failure to address the social conditions that significantly affect people's capacity to exercise their reproductive autonomy. We discuss how a public health ethics approach to RCS is broader in focus than prevention. We also show that additional values inherent to ethical public health-such as equity and solidarity-are essential to underpin and inform the aims and implementation of reproductive carrier screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Dive
- Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cook L, Schulze J, Naito A, Alcalay RN. The Role of Genetic Testing for Parkinson's Disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2021; 21:17. [PMID: 33686495 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-021-01100-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To describe current practices and attitudes about genetic testing for Parkinson's disease (PD) among neurologists, highlight the changing scene of genetic testing for PD, and provide guidance on facilitating PD genetic testing in a clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS Since the 1990s, researchers have discovered several major gene variants contributing to PD etiology. A large body of literature now exists supporting the frequency of these variants in different populations and their effects on phenotype and clinical course. Recently, clinical trials have emerged with therapies targeting genetic forms of PD, specifically LRRK2 and GBA. Despite this growing knowledge, genetic testing for PD is not typically offered by neurologists including movement disorder specialists. Neurologists express concerns about the financial and practical issues of genetic testing as well as the potential impact on their patients. Researchers and specialists in the field are questioning this hesitation as clinical utility and consumer demand increase. Consideration of genetic testing for PD is shifting, as we enter a new era of precision medicine and gain clinical knowledge about PD. Barriers to testing, as perceived by clinicians, can be overcome with education, support, and involvement of multiple stakeholders with the goal of making PD genetic testing accessible to all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lola Cook
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics/Hereditary Genomics Division, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-3002, USA.
| | - Jeanine Schulze
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics/Hereditary Genomics Division, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-3002, USA
| | | | - Roy N Alcalay
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Traversi D, Pulliero A, Izzotti A, Franchitti E, Iacoviello L, Gianfagna F, Gialluisi A, Izzi B, Agodi A, Barchitta M, Calabrò GE, Hoxhaj I, Sassano M, Sbrogiò LG, Del Sole A, Marchiori F, Pitini E, Migliara G, Marzuillo C, De Vito C, Tamburro M, Sammarco ML, Ripabelli G, Villari P, Boccia S. Precision Medicine and Public Health: New Challenges for Effective and Sustainable Health. J Pers Med 2021; 11:135. [PMID: 33669364 PMCID: PMC7920275 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11020135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of high-throughput omics technologies represents an unmissable opportunity for evidence-based prevention of adverse effects on human health. However, the applicability and access to multi-omics tests are limited. In Italy, this is due to the rapid increase of knowledge and the high levels of skill and economic investment initially necessary. The fields of human genetics and public health have highlighted the relevance of an implementation strategy at a national level in Italy, including integration in sanitary regulations and governance instruments. In this review, the emerging field of public health genomics is discussed, including the polygenic scores approach, epigenetic modulation, nutrigenomics, and microbiomes implications. Moreover, the Italian state of implementation is presented. The omics sciences have important implications for the prevention of both communicable and noncommunicable diseases, especially because they can be used to assess the health status during the whole course of life. An effective population health gain is possible if omics tools are implemented for each person after a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in the medium to long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Traversi
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Pulliero
- Department of Health Sciences School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy;
| | - Alberto Izzotti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy;
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 161632 Genova, Italy
| | - Elena Franchitti
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy;
| | - Licia Iacoviello
- Research Center in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (EPIMED), Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; (L.I.); (F.G.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy; (A.G.); (B.I.)
| | - Francesco Gianfagna
- Research Center in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (EPIMED), Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; (L.I.); (F.G.)
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, 80122 Napoli, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gialluisi
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy; (A.G.); (B.I.)
| | - Benedetta Izzi
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy; (A.G.); (B.I.)
| | - Antonella Agodi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (A.A.); (M.B.)
| | - Martina Barchitta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (A.A.); (M.B.)
| | - Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (G.E.C.); (I.H.); (M.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Ilda Hoxhaj
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (G.E.C.); (I.H.); (M.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Michele Sassano
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (G.E.C.); (I.H.); (M.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Luca Gino Sbrogiò
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione, Az. ULSS3 Serenissima, 30174 Venezia, Italy;
| | | | | | - Erica Pitini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy; (E.P.); (G.M.); (C.M.); (C.D.V.); (P.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Migliara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy; (E.P.); (G.M.); (C.M.); (C.D.V.); (P.V.)
| | - Carolina Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy; (E.P.); (G.M.); (C.M.); (C.D.V.); (P.V.)
| | - Corrado De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy; (E.P.); (G.M.); (C.M.); (C.D.V.); (P.V.)
| | - Manuela Tamburro
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “Vincenzo Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (M.T.); (M.L.S.); (G.R.)
| | - Michela Lucia Sammarco
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “Vincenzo Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (M.T.); (M.L.S.); (G.R.)
| | - Giancarlo Ripabelli
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “Vincenzo Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (M.T.); (M.L.S.); (G.R.)
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy; (E.P.); (G.M.); (C.M.); (C.D.V.); (P.V.)
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (G.E.C.); (I.H.); (M.S.); (S.B.)
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health-Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mega A, Galluzzi S, Bonvicini C, Fostinelli S, Gennarelli M, Geroldi C, Zanetti O, Benussi L, Di Maria E, Frisoni GB. Genetic counselling and testing for inherited dementia: single-centre evaluation of the consensus Italian DIAfN protocol. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2020; 12:152. [PMID: 33203472 PMCID: PMC7670800 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-020-00720-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background A consensus protocol for genetic counselling and testing of familial dementia, the Italian Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer’s and Frontotemporal Network (IT-DIAfN) protocol, has been developed in Italy by a network of expert dementia centres. The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the genetic counselling and testing process, as undertaken according to the IT-DIAfN protocol in one of the IT-DIAfN dementia research centres. Methods The protocol was tested by a multidisciplinary team at the IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy, on affected individuals with suspected inherited forms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and to healthy at-risk relatives. The genetic counselling and testing process consisted of (i) pre-test consultation and psychological assessment (ii) genetic testing, (iii) genetic test result disclosure and (iv) follow-up consultation and psychological assessment. Results Twenty affected individuals from 17 families fulfilled the family history criteria of the IT-DIAfN protocol for suspected inherited dementia (17 for AD, 2 for FTD, 1 for inclusion body myopathy with Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia) and were included in the protocol. Nineteen out of 20 affected individuals received the genetic test result (one left after the pre-test consultation being not ready to cope with an unfavourable outcome). A pathogenic mutation was found in 6 affected individuals (1 in PSEN1, 2 in PSEN2, 1 in GRN, 1 in MAPT, 1 in VCP). Eleven healthy at-risk relatives asked to undergo predictive testing and were included in the protocol. Three completed the protocol, including follow-up; one did not ask for the genetic test result after genetic testing; and eight withdrew before the genetic testing, mainly due to an increased awareness about the possible consequences of an unfavourable test result. To date, no catastrophic reactions were reported at the follow-up. Conclusions Our case series shows that a structured genetic counselling and testing protocol for inherited dementia can be implemented in both affected individuals and at-risk relatives in a research setting. The procedure was shown to be safe in terms of occurrence of catastrophic events. A formal validation in larger cohorts is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Mega
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Samantha Galluzzi
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cristian Bonvicini
- Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvia Fostinelli
- Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Gennarelli
- Genetics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cristina Geroldi
- Alzheimer's Unit - Memory Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Orazio Zanetti
- Alzheimer's Unit - Memory Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luisa Benussi
- Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Emilio Di Maria
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. .,Unit of Medical Genetics, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.,University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoxhaj I, Govaerts L, Simoens S, Van Dyck W, Huys I, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Boccia S. A Systematic Review of the Value Assessment Frameworks Used within Health Technology Assessment of Omics Technologies and Their Actual Adoption from HTA Agencies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E8001. [PMID: 33143182 PMCID: PMC7663163 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omics technologies, enabling the measurements of genes (genomics), mRNA (transcriptomics), proteins (proteomics) and metabolites (metabolomics), are valuable tools for personalized decision-making. We aimed to identify the existing value assessment frameworks used by health technology assessment (HTA) doers for the evaluation of omics technologies through a systematic review. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to retrieve potential eligible articles published until 31 May 2020 in English. Additionally, through a desk research in HTA agencies' repositories, we retrieved the published reports on the practical use of these frameworks. RESULTS Twenty-three articles were included in the systematic review. Twenty-two frameworks, which addressed genetic and/or genomic technologies, were described. Most of them derived from the ACCE framework and evaluated the domains of analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility. We retrieved forty-five reports, which mainly addressed the commercial transcriptomic prognostics and next generation sequencing, and evaluated clinical effectiveness, economic aspects, and description and technical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS A value assessment framework for the HTA evaluation of omics technologies is not standardized and accepted, yet. Our work reports that the most evaluated domains are analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility and economic aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilda Hoxhaj
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (I.H.); (S.B.)
| | - Laurenz Govaerts
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | - Walter Van Dyck
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | | | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (I.H.); (S.B.)
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health-Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Atti Le giornate della ricerca scientificae delle esperienze professionali dei giovani: Società Italiana di Igiene, Medicina Preventiva e Sanità Pubblica (SItI) Roma 20-21 dicembre 2019. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2020; 60:E1-E85. [PMID: 32258536 PMCID: PMC7105054 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.4s3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|