1
|
Hebing RCF, Elhendy N, van Geel EH, van Heuckelum M, Nurmohamed MT, van den Bemt BJF. The correlation between 4 adherence measurements methods in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using methotrexate. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 90:882-889. [PMID: 38048762 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, adherence to MTX therapy is not optimal, and instruments to assess medication nonadherence are warranted. To date there is no consensus on the best method to determine adherence to MTX. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between adherence assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) vs. pill count, MTX-polyglutamate (PG) concentration and Compliance Questionnaire-Rheumatology (CQR) in patients with established RA. Second, the correlations between these methods and the Disease Activity Scores of 28 joints (DAS28) were examined. METHODS Adult RA patients currently treated with MTX were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regression were used, with adherence assessed with MEMS as dependent variable vs. pill count, MTX-PG concentrations, CQR as independent variables and DAS28 vs. each of the 4 adherence measurements. Covariates were included, such as comedication, age and use of corticosteroids. RESULTS In total, 190 consecutive RA patients were included. Pill count was correlated with adherence assessed with MEMS (linear regression, β = 0.588, 95% confidence interval = 0.255-0.921, P < .001), whereas CQR and MTX-PGs were not. Logistic regression confirmed the correlation between dichotomized adherence and pill count only (β = 4.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.31-7.64, P = .006). No other correlations were found, either for all adherence outcomes or DAS28. CONCLUSION Measuring adherence with MEMS is correlated with pill count, whereas other methods were not correlated with MEMS or with DAS28. Pill count can be used to estimate adherence to MTX therapy, in case MEMS is not achievable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske C F Hebing
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, location Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nada Elhendy
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, location Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva H van Geel
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, location Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael T Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, location Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hebing RC, Aksu I, Twisk JW, Bos W, Van den Bemt B, Nurmohamed MT. Effectiveness of electronic drug monitoring feedback to increase adherence in patients with RA initiating a biological DMARD: a randomised clinical trial. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2021-001712. [PMID: 35121638 PMCID: PMC8819786 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Medication non-adherence in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with disease flares, increased disability and increased costs. This study assessed the effectiveness of electronic monitoring feedback (EMF) on medication adherence in patients with RA starting with or switching to a new biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD). Methods In this randomised controlled trial, bDMARD starters were assigned to the intervention or control group and followed for 1 year. The intervention group received a needle container with a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) cap registering patient’s adherence to injections. Scores were calculated every 3 months with MEMS and motivational interviewing feedback was given. The control group received usual care. Effectiveness of EMF on adherence was measured with the medication possession ratio (MPR). Results 104 consecutive intervention patients were included and 102 controls. MPR was 0.95 (SD: 0.10) and 0.90 (0.16) after 12 months (B: 0.036, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.007, p=0.045). bDMARD-naive patients receiving EMF achieved low disease activity (LDA) sooner compared with the control group, adjusted for baseline DAS (HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.00 to 2.81, p=0.050). Side effects and DAS28 were similar. Conclusion EMF increased adherence for patients with RA starting with or switching to a bDMARD. Especially bDMARD-naive patients achieved LDA sooner compared with the control group, which holds promise for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske Cf Hebing
- Rheumatology, Pharmacy, Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iremnur Aksu
- Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Wr Twisk
- Department of Methodology and Applied Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter Bos
- Rheumatology, Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Van den Bemt
- Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek Afdeling Reumatologie, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michael T Nurmohamed
- Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bekker CL, Aslani P, Chen TF. The use of medication adherence guidelines in medication taking behaviour research. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 18:2325-2330. [PMID: 34393079 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Medication nonadherence continues to be a serious issue in a range of long-term medical conditions and has been studied extensively over the past few decades. However, despite the plethora of research studies on medication adherence, poor methodological rigour in many studies has contributed to limited generalisability of the positive findings, limited impact on patients' medication adherence, and inability to compare between studies. This paper focuses on current guidelines designed specifically for research on medication adherence. It discusses key elements to consider during study design, selection of adherence measurements, and reporting on medication adherence research, to ensure a higher quality of research in medication adherence. Overall, there appears to be variations in adherence terminology reported in the literature despite improvements in defining medication taking behaviour and the availability of taxonomies. In addition, limited guidance exists on how best to measure adherence. Recommendations are provided on appropriate adherence measures for the adherence behaviour being investigated, including careful consideration of adherence concepts, validity of adherence instruments, appropriate instrument selection, definition of nonadherence threshold, and how to report medication adherence. Improving adherence research requires greater clarity and standardisation of descriptions of nonadherence behaviour, increased methodological rigour in study designs, better selection of adherence measurements, and comprehensive reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Bekker
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Parisa Aslani
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Timothy F Chen
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agreement with the French 2019 recommendations on treatment adherence in rheumatic diseases among 357 health professionals. Joint Bone Spine 2020; 87:513-515. [PMID: 32387149 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
5
|
van Heuckelum M, Hebing RCF, Vandeberg L, Linn AJ, Flendrie M, Nurmohamed MT, van Dulmen S, van den Ende CHM, van den Bemt BJF. Are Health Care Professionals' Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Associated With Those of Their Patients? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 73:364-373. [PMID: 32166901 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is generally unknown how the attitudes and beliefs of health care professionals (HCPs) might affect the attitudes, beliefs, and medication-taking behavior of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aims 1) to examine the attitudes, health-related associations (both implicit and explicit), and beliefs of HCPs about conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and 2) to assess whether these attitudes, health-related associations, and beliefs of HCPs are associated with those of their patients, with their patients' medication-taking behavior, and disease activity. METHODS HCPs were recruited from 2 centers that specialized in rheumatology across The Netherlands, and patient recruitment followed. In this observational study, implicit outcomes were measured with single-category implicit association tests, whereas explicit outcomes were measured with a bipolar evaluative adjective scale and the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire-Specific. Spearman's rank correlations were used to describe correlations between implicit and explicit measures of the attitudes of HCPs. Multilevel, mixed-effects linear models were used to examine the association of HCP-related characteristics, including the implicit and explicit outcomes of HCPs, with those of their patients, their medication-taking behaviors, and disease activity. RESULTS Of the 1,659 initially invited patients, 254 patients with RA (mean age 62.8 years, mean disease duration 11.8 years, and 68.1% of the patients were female) who were treated by 26 different HCPs agreed to participate in this study. The characteristics, attitudes, health-related associations, and beliefs about medicines of HCPs were not significantly associated with those of their patients, nor with their medication-taking behaviors or disease activity scores. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that the attitudes, health-related associations (as measured both implicitly and explicitly), and beliefs of HCPs were not significantly associated with the attitudes, beliefs, medication-taking behavior, and disease activity of patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Renske C F Hebing
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa Vandeberg
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek J Linn
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mike T Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | | | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Sint Maartenskliniek and Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mathijssen EGE, Vriezekolk JE, Popa CD, van den Bemt BJF. Shared decision making in routine clinical care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an assessment of audio-recorded consultations. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 79:170-175. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
ObjectivesAlthough shared decision making (SDM) is advocated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, it is largely unclear when, how and to what extent SDM is applied in routine clinical care of patients with RA. This study aimed to investigate the level of SDM in RA treatment from an observer perspective and to assess associations between the level of SDM and characteristics of the clinician, patient and consultation.MethodsThe level of SDM was investigated by scoring audio-recordings of 168 routine consultations with unique patients with the observer patient involvement (OPTION) scale (scale 0–100, higher OPTION scores indicating higher levels of SDM). Associations between the level of SDM and characteristics of the clinician, patient and consultation were assessed using multilevel modelling. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.ResultsThe mean OPTION score was 28.3 (SD=15.1). The multilevel model included four characteristics: clinician age, patient age, consultation duration and type of treatment decision. There were significant, positive associations between the level of SDM and the consultation duration (b=0.63, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.11), decision for stopping and/or starting medication (b=14.30, 95% CI 5.62 to 22.98), decision for adjusting medication doses (b=8.36, 95% CI 3.92 to 12.81) and decision for administering single dose glucocorticoids (b=15.03, 95% CI 9.12 to 20.93). Thus, a higher level of SDM was significantly associated with a longer consultation duration and the type of treatment decision. No other significant associations were found.ConclusionsOverall, the level of SDM in RA treatment leaves room for improvement. To foster SDM in routine clinical care, training programmes on patient-centred communication skills may be helpful.
Collapse
|