Switching to bedaquiline for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: A retrospective cohort analysis

Cycles of antibiotic use and emergent antimicrobial resistance in the South African tuberculosis programme (1950-2021): A scoping review and critical reflections on stewardship

The emergent threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has resulted in debates around the use and preservation of effective antimicrobials. Concerns around AMR reflect a history of increasing dependence on antibiotics to address disease epidemics rooted in profound structural and systemic challenges. In the context of global health, this process, often referred to as pharmaceuticalisation, has commonly occurred within disease programmes, of which lessons are vital for adding nuance to conversations around antimicrobial stewardship. Tuberculosis (TB) is a notable example. A disease which accounts for one-third of AMR globally and remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent in many low - and middle-income countries, including South Africa. In this scoping review, we chart TB science in South Africa over 70 years of programming. We reviewed published manuscripts about the programme and critically reflected on the implications of our findings for stewardship. We identified cycles of programmatic responses to new drug availability and the emergence of drug resistance, which intersected with cycles of pharmaceuticalisation. These cycles reflect the political, economic, and social factors influencing programmatic decision-making. Our analysis offers a starting point for research exploring these cycles and drawing out implications for stewardship across the TB and AMR communities.

Spatial heterogeneity of extensively drug resistant-tuberculosis in Western Cape Province, South Africa

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading infectious disease killer globally. Treatment outcomes are especially poor among people with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB, until recently defined as rifampicin-resistant (RR) TB with resistance to an aminoglycoside (amikacin) and a fluoroquinolone (ofloxacin). We used laboratory TB test results from Western Cape province, South Africa between 2012 and 2015 to identify XDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB (RR-TB with resistance to one second-line drug) spatial hotspots. We mapped the percentage and count of individuals with RR-TB that had XDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB across the province and in Cape Town, as well as amikacin-resistant and ofloxacin-resistant TB. We found the percentage of pre-XDR-TB and the count of XDR-TB/pre-XDR-TB highly heterogeneous with geographic hotspots within RR-TB high burden areas, and found hotspots in both percentage and count of amikacin-resistant and ofloxacin-resistant TB. The spatial distribution of percentage ofloxacin-resistant TB hotspots was similar to XDR-TB hotspots, suggesting that fluoroquinolone-resistace is often the first step to additional resistance. Our work shows that interventions used to reduce XDR-TB incidence may need to be targeted within spatial locations of RR-TB, and further research is required to understand underlying drivers of XDR-TB transmission in these locations.

Effectiveness of the Novel Anti-TB Bedaquiline against Drug-Resistant TB in Africa: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: In 2018, an estimated 10.0 million people contracted tuberculosis (TB), and 1.5 million died from it, including 1.25 million HIV-negative persons and 251,000 HIV-associated TB fatalities. Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is an important contributor to global TB mortality. Multi-drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) is defined as TB resistant to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RMP), which are recommended by the WHO as essential drugs for treatment. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of bedaquiline addition to the treatment of drug-resistant TB infections on the African continent. Methodology: The search engine databases Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase were used to obtain published data pertaining to DR-TB between 2012 and 2021 in Africa. Included studies had to document clinical characteristics at treatment initiation and outcomes at the end of treatment (i.e., success, failure, recurrence, loss to follow-up, and death). The included studies were used to conduct a meta-analysis. All data analysis and visualization were performed using the R programming environment. The log risk ratios and sample variances were calculated for DR-TB patients treated with BBQ monotherapy vs. BDQ and other drug therapy. To quantify heterogeneity among the included studies, random effect sizes were calculated. Results: A total of 16 studies in Africa from Mozambique (N = 1 study), Eswatini (N = 1 study), Democratic Republic of the Congo (N = 1 study), South Africa (N = 12 studies), and a multicenter study undertaken across Africa (N = 1 study) were included. In total, 22,368 individuals participated in the research studies. Among the patients, (55.2%; 12,350/22,368) were male while 9723/22,368 (44%) were female. Overall, (9%; 2033/22,368) of patients received BDQ monotherapy, while (88%; 19,630/22,368) patients received bedaquiline combined with other antibiotics. In total, (42%; 9465/22,368) of the patients were successfully treated. About (39%; 8653/22,368) of participants finished their therapy, meanwhile (5%; 1166/22,368) did not finish their therapy, while people (0.4%; 99/22,368) were lost to follow up. A total of (42%; 9265/22,368) patients died. Conclusion: Very few studies on bedaquiline usage in DR-TB in Africa have been published to date. Bedaquiline has been shown to enhance DR-TB results in clinical studies and programmatic settings. Hence, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that it be included in DR-TB regimens. However, in the current study limited improvement to DR-TB treatment results were observed using BDQ on the continent. Better in-country monitoring and reporting, as well as multi-country collaborative cohort studies of DR-TB, can expand the knowledge of bedaquiline usage and clinical impact, as well as the risks and benefits throughout the continent.

Assessment of epidemiological and genetic characteristics and clinical outcomes of resistance to bedaquiline in patients treated for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Bedaquiline improves outcomes of patients with rifampicin-resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis; however, emerging resistance threatens this success. We did a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis evaluating the epidemiology, genetic basis, and treatment outcomes associated with bedaquiline resistance, using data from South Africa (2015-19).

METHODS

Patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis starting bedaquiline-based treatment had surveillance samples submitted at baseline, month 2, and month 6, along with demographic information. Culture-positive baseline and post-baseline isolates had phenotypic resistance determined. Eligible patients were aged 12 years or older with a positive culture sample at baseline or, if the sample was invalid or negative, a sample within 30 days of the baseline sample submitted for bedaquiline drug susceptibility testing. For the longitudinal study, the first surveillance sample had to be phenotypically susceptible to bedaquiline for inclusion. Whole-genome sequencing was done on bedaquiline-resistant isolates and a subset of bedaquiline-susceptible isolates. The National Institute for Communicable Diseases tuberculosis reference laboratory, and national tuberculosis surveillance databases were matched to the Electronic Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Register. We assessed baseline resistance prevalence, mutations, transmission, cumulative resistance incidence, and odds ratios (ORs) associating risk factors for resistance with patient outcomes.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 1, 2015, and July 31, 2019, 8041 patients had surveillance samples submitted, of whom 2023 were included in the cross-sectional analysis and 695 in the longitudinal analysis. Baseline bedaquiline resistance prevalence was 3·8% (76 of 2023 patients; 95% CI 2·9-4·6), and it was associated with previous exposure to bedaquiline or clofazimine (OR 7·1, 95% CI 2·3-21·9) and with rifampicin-resistant or MDR tuberculosis with additional resistance to either fluoroquinolones or injectable drugs (pre-extensively-drug resistant [XDR] tuberculosis: 4·2, 1·7-10·5) or to both (XDR tuberculosis: 4·8, 2·0-11·7). Rv0678 mutations were the sole genetic basis of phenotypic resistance. Baseline resistance could be attributed to previous bedaquiline or clofazimine exposure in four (5·3%) of 76 patients and to primary transmission in six (7·9%). Odds of successful treatment outcomes were lower in patients with baseline bedaquiline resistance (0·5, 0·3-1). Resistance during treatment developed in 16 (2·3%) of 695 patients, at a median of 90 days (IQR 62-195), with 12 of these 16 having pre-XDR or XDR.

INTERPRETATION

Bedaquiline resistance was associated with poorer treatment outcomes. Rapid assessment of bedaquiline resistance, especially when patients were previously exposed to bedaquiline or clofazimine, should be prioritised at baseline or if patients remain culture-positive after 2 months of treatment. Preventing resistance by use of novel combination therapies, current treatment optimisation, and patient support is essential.

FUNDING

National Institute for Communicable Diseases of South Africa.