Is latent tuberculosis infection challenging in Iranian health care workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Performance of Current Diagnostic Tools in Detecting Latent Tuberculosis Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review

Testing for latent tuberculosis infection is essential for diagnosing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections in asymptomatic individuals. Preventing the transition of latent to active tuberculosis is imperative, especially in high-risk populations such as healthcare workers. Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) and the Mantoux/tuberculin skin test (TST) are two examples of diagnostic instruments utilized for detection. Systematic evaluations of the characteristics of widely available tests are very helpful for diagnosticians because these tests might not be easily accessible in situations with limited resources. This systematic review aims to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of tests for latent tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers. The review, conducted from 2013 to 2024, aimed to identify studies on "Latent Tuberculosis," "Healthcare workers," "Diagnostic modalities," "TST," "Interferon-gamma release assays," and "IGRA." The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and developed a data extraction toolkit. Three authors independently reviewed the literature, ensuring uniformity. Discrepancies were resolved through discussions and mediation until a consensus was reached. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of 0.05 or lower. The review provides valuable insights into the diagnostic accuracy of these tests, particularly in high-risk populations. The TST had a sensitivity of 76.5% (confidence interval (CI) = 61.5-91.5%) and specificity of 77.2% (CI = 65-85%). Its positive predictive value (PPV) was 54.8% (CI = 45-65%), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.5% (CI = 85-92%), with an odds ratio of 63.6 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72. QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) showed a sensitivity of 68.35% (CI = 67.15-70.55%) and a specificity of 82.32% (CI = 72.32-97.47%). Its PPV was 56% (CI = 54-92%), and NPV was 92.7% (CI = 89-96%), with an odds ratio of 357.9 and an AUC of 0.767. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) had a sensitivity of 85% (CI = 78.9-91.1%) and a specificity of 73.52% (CI = 35.71-93.75%). Its PPV was 59.2% (CI = 39.3-78.2%), and NPV was 95% (CI = 91.2-98%), with an odds ratio of 125.39 and an AUC of 0.89. T-SPOT.TB showed a sensitivity of 92% (CI = 87-97%) and a specificity of 95.7% (CI = 94-98%). Its PPV was 86.8% (CI = 85-95.8%), and NPV was 95.8% (CI = 92.5-96.7%), with an odds ratio of 1.03 and an AUC of 0.7. CLIA-IGRA had a sensitivity of 100% (CI = 99.9-100%) and a specificity of 95.57% (CI = 95.57-100%). Its PPV was 96.8% (CI = 96.8-100%), and NPV was 99.8% (CI = 99.8-100%), with an odds ratio of 1509 and an AUC of 0.97. HBHA-induced IGRA showed a sensitivity of 86.4% (CI = 71.1-97.3%) and a specificity of 82.5% (CI = 66.4-92.6%). Its PPV was 86.8% (CI = 66.7-95.3%), and NPV was 86.4% (CI = 57.8-95.7%), with an odds ratio of 6.18 and an AUC of 0.886. There are specific benefits and drawbacks of each diagnostic test for latent tuberculosis infection. With its exceptional sensitivity and specificity, the CLIA-IGRA test is a top choice for a precise diagnosis of tuberculosis. Practical factors such as availability and cost, however, might prevent its widespread usage. Both the QuantiFERON and TST are still useful tools, especially when used in certain populations or situations when their performance characteristics meet clinical requirements.

Changes in incidence and clinical features of tuberculosis with regard to the COVID-19 outbreak in Southern Iran

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, remains a significant global health threat. It results in substantial mortality and may be underrecognized due to insufficient screening and diagnostic challenges. Furthermore, TB's impact is closely linked to complex socioeconomic and healthcare factors. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges due to similarities in clinical presentation and transmission dynamics with TB. Socioeconomic factors such as limited access to healthcare services, resource constraints, and social stigma further complicate TB management. Historically, TB faced increased burdens during natural disasters, wars, and pandemics. This study analyzes TB incidence changes, emphasizing the crucial need for timely diagnosis within the context of COVID-19 measures.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study, conducted at Shiraz's TB referral center in Southern Iran, covered the period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. We analyzed patient data, including epidemiological and demographic factors, clinical and radiological features, and treatment outcomes. Data were compared between the pre-COVID-19 pandemic era and the COVID-19 pandemic era (from March 2020), using standard and regression analyses. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We analyzed 388 TB patients with a mean age of 48.38 ± 20.53 years, including 264 pulmonary cases (68.0%). The highest incidence of TB was recorded in 2019, representing 27.6% of the cases. During the COVID-19 era, logistic regression analysis identified significant associations with higher education levels (P = 0.032; OR = 1.380; 95% CI: 1.028-1.851), a decrease in symptoms such as sputum production (P = 0.004; OR = 0.342; 95% CI: 0.166-0.705) and chills (P = 0.036; OR = 0.282; 95% CI: 0.087-0.919), and an increase in symptoms of fatigue (P = 0.006; OR = 2.856; 95% CI: 1.358-6.005).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a prolonged impact on TB cases in our country, resulting in a reduction in reported cases due to challenges in quarantine and screening. However, it has also led to a shift in TB patterns and a potential increase in latent TB cases and future mortality rates. Addressing the repercussions requires enhanced control strategies, prioritized service delivery, and secured funding for intensified case finding, expanded contact-tracing, community engagement, digital health tools, and uninterrupted access to medications.

The global, prevalence, and risk factors of postoperative fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This study aimed to explore the global, prevalence, and risk factors of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

The high-sensitivity searching was conducted without time limitation until December 30, 2020 in Web of Sciences, Scopus, and PubMed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

The prevalence rates of fever and sepsis among patient undergoing PCNL were estimated 9.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3%-9.7%), and 4.5% (95% CI: 4.2%-4.8%), respectively. Nephrostomy tube was used in 9.96% (95% CI: 9.94%-9.97%) of patients. The mean preoperative white blood cells of patients were 6.401×109/L; 18.3% and 4.55% of patients were considered as the positive urinary culture and pyuria, respectively. About 20.4% of patients suffered from residual stones. The odds ratios (ORs) of fever in patients who suffering from diabetes mellitus, hydronephrosis, staghorn stones, and blood transfusion were 4.62 (95% CI: 2.95-7.26), 1.04 (95% CI: 0.81-1.34), 2.57 (95% CI: 0.93-7.11), and 2.65 (95% CI: 1.62-4.35), respectively. Patients who underwent PCNL in prone position were more likely to develop fever (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.75-2.00) than patients in supine position.

Conclusion

The current study showed that patients who suffer from diabetes mellitus, hydronephrosis, staghorn stones, nephrostomy tube or double-J stent, blood transfusion, and also patients who underwent PCNL in prone position surgery are more likely to develop a postoperative fever after PCNL.

Prevalence of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Among Nurses Working in Critical Areas at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Introduction Tuberculosis is a critical health issue worldwide. Most infected persons are asymptomatic and categorized as having a latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Healthcare workers (HCWs) are more prone to being infected with tuberculosis and should be enrolled in a screening program for early detection. Objectives The study aims to estimate the prevalence of LTBI among nurses working in critical areas which include adult intensive care units, pediatric intensive care units, emergency departments, oncology departments, dialysis departments, tuberculosis labs, isolation rooms, and cardiac center intensive care units. Methods A record-based cross-sectional survey measured the prevalence of LTBI among nurses working in critical areas at Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We reviewed the occupational health records of all nurses working in critical areas from June 1, 2021, to June 1, 2022. We recorded the data reviewed throughout the year in the Occupational Health Department at PSMMC. We excluded all participants with previously documented positive tuberculin skin test (TST) from the study. We analyzed the sociodemographic data, working years, working location, job title, and TST results. Results We included a total of 771 out of 2025 nurses in this study. Participants were mostly women (88%) and in the 26-35-year age group (67.7%). Most of the participants were originally from the Philippines (66.3%). The overall LTBI prevalence among nurses was 34.5%. The highest prevalence of LTBI was among nurses working in the cardiac intensive care unit (53.5%), and the lowest prevalence was among nurses working in the isolation department (8.9%; p-value <0.0001). Those who worked more in the hospital were significantly more infected with LTBI (p-value <0.04). Conclusion LTBI remains a significant health risk worldwide and in the Middle East as well as among HCWs. This underscores the necessity of comprehensive pre-hiring screening, annual screening, infection control protocols, and active management of HCWs with LTBI.

Changes in the rate of bacillus tuberculosis infection in health workers in the first year of the COVID-19 epidemic in Kashan- Iran

Objective

This cohort study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of latent tuberculosis infection among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A one-year cohort study was conducted in a referral hospital in Kashan, involving 176 medical, educational, and cleaning personnel. Initial evaluations and tuberculin skin tests were performed, followed by a one-year follow-up period. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26 software.

Results

Among the participants, 26.1% (46 individuals) tested positive for latent tuberculosis infection. Age was a significant risk factor, with a 3.6% increase in latent tuberculosis infection risk with each advancing year. Men had 2.19 times (1.10-4.35) the chance of having a latent infection compared to women. Hospital staff were 3.7 times more at risk of tuberculosis infection than students. Among the hospital job categories, nursing assistants had the highest chance of tuberculosis infection, 6.77 times higher than medical students, followed by cleaning staff and nurses. The ICU, General, and Obstetrics and Gynecology departments had an infection chance of 2.46 (1.11-5.46) compared to other departments. No new positive cases were detected during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

This study contributes to the understanding of latent tuberculosis infection prevalence and its risk factors among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings highlight the importance of infection control measures and targeted interventions to protect healthcare workers from occupational tuberculosis exposure.

Spatio-temporal epidemiology of the tuberculosis incidence rate in Iran 2008 to 2018

BACKGROUND

Effective reduction of tuberculosis (TB) requires information on the distribution of TB incidence rate across time and location. This study aims to identify the spatio-temporal pattern of TB incidence rate in Iran between 2008 and 2018.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on aggregated TB data (50,500 patients) at the provincial level provided by the Ministry of Health in Iran between 2008 and 2018. The Anselin Local Moran's I and Getis-Ord Gi* were performed to identify the spatial variations of the disease. Furthermore, spatial scan statistic was employed for purely temporal and spatio-temporal analyses. In all instances, the null hypothesis of no clusters was rejected at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

The overall incidence rate of TB decreased from 13.46 per 100,000 (95% CI: 13.19-13.73) in 2008 to 10.88 per 100,000 (95% CI: 10.65-11.11) in 2018. The highest incidence rate of TB was observed in southeast and northeast of Iran for the whole study period. Additionally, spatial cluster analysis discovered Khuzestan Province, in the West of the country, having significantly higher rates than neighbouring provinces in terms of both total TB and smear-positive pulmonary TB (SPPTB). Purely temporal analysis showed that high-rate and low-rate clusters were predominantly distributed in the time periods 2010-2014 and 2017-2018. Spatio-temporal results showed that the statistically significant clusters were mainly distributed from centre to the east during the study period. Some high-trend TB and SPPTB statistically significant clusters were found.

CONCLUSION

The results provided an overview of the latest TB spatio-temporal status In Iran and identified decreasing trends of TB in the 2008-2018 period. Despite the decreasing incidence rate, there is still need for screening, and targeting of preventive interventions, especially in high-risk areas. Knowledge of the spatio-temporal pattern of TB can be useful for policy development as the information regarding the high-risk areas would contribute to the selection of areas needed to be targeted for the expansion of health facilities.