The seroconversion rate of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test in psoriatic patients receiving secukinumab and ixekizumab, the anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibodies

Evaluation of serial QuantiFERON-TB Gold in tube test results and tuberculosis infection status in patients with psoriasis receiving anti-IL-17 treatment (secukinumab and ixekizumab): Real-world data from a tuberculosis-endemic country

BACKGROUND

In comparison with TNF-α inhibitors, anti-IL-17A agents are considered to have a lower risk of active tuberculosis (TB) or latent TB infection (LTBI) reactivation.

METHODS

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the TB infection status and serial QuantiFERON-TB-Gold in tube test (QFT) results of psoriasis patients using IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab [SEC] and ixekizumab [IXE]) in a real-world setting from a tuberculosis-endemic country. Patients who used an anti-IL-17 agent for at least 3 months in our follow-up were included in the study. Patients' clinical and demographic features, baseline QFT results and latest QFT results (if any), and TB infection status were noted from the past medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 717 patients, of whom 333 (46.4%) were female, were included in the study. The cumulative exposure time to an anti-IL-17 agent was 14,147 patient-months, 9743 patient-months for SEC and 4404 patient-months for IXE. Also, 459 (SEC = 305/IXE = 154) patients used an anti-IL-17 agent for ≥ 12 months. Of these, 125 had positive baseline QFT results. In all, 334 had negative baseline QFT results. The latest QFT result of 309 was also negative (persistent seronegative group). During follow-up, the QFT results of 10 patients changed from negative to positive (positive seroconversion group). Seven of them were using SEC and three were using IXE, respectively. No case of active TB infection was detected.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the positive seroconversion rate of 10/334 seems high, but this did not translate to active disease. However, closer monitoring may be required, especially in patients with advanced age, the presence of PsA, long disease duration and long anti-IL-17 treatment duration.

Interleukin-17A Inhibitors in Patients with Psoriasis and Tuberculosis Infection: A 2-Year Prospective Study on Safety Without Preventive Treatment

INTRODUCTION

The necessity for tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) and routine T-SPOT.TB monitoring in patients with psoriasis and tuberculosis infection (TBI) undergoing interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor therapy remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the long-term safety of IL-17A inhibitors administered without TPT and analyze changes in T-SPOT.TB among these patients. It also identifies risk factors for TBI in patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

This single-center prospective study enrolled adult patients with plaque psoriasis and TBI receiving IL-17A inhibitors. TBI was defined as positive T-SPOT.TB results (≥ 6 spots) without symptoms or evidence of active tuberculosis (ATB). TPT administration was based on contraindications, tuberculosis risk factors, and patient preferences. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ATB over 2 years. Secondary outcomes included T-SPOT.TB changes and TBI risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 129 patients with psoriasis and TBI enrolled in the study, 97 (75.2%) did not receive TPT, while 32 (24.8%) did. Among them, 109 patients (84.5%) completed the 2-year follow-up. During the 235 person-years of observation, no ATB cases were identified. Median T-SPOT.TB values showed no significant changes from baseline to year 2 in both the non-TPT (20 vs. 17 spots, p = 0.975) and TPT groups (55 vs. 58 spots, p = 0.830). T-SPOT.TB reversed in 14 patients (12.8%), mostly in the non-TPT group. Moreover, for TBI risk factor analysis, a cohort of 212 patients with psoriasis with negative baseline T-SPOT.TB was evaluated, revealing a TBI prevalence of 37.8%. Logistic regression analysis highlighted age ≥ 45 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-3.99, p < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) < 24.0 kg/m2 (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.27-3.54, p = 0.004) as independent risk factors for TBI.

CONCLUSION

IL-17A inhibitors do not appear to reactivate tuberculosis in patients with psoriasis and TBI, potentially reducing the need for routine TBI screening and preventive treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100045823.

Clinical advances in biological therapy for generalized pustular psoriasis: a review

INTRODUCTION

In 2022, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first biologics, intravenous spesolimab, for acute flare of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). The drug works by blocking IL-36 signaling, the key pathway of GPP. Among the known mutations causing GPP, IL36RN mutations are most common, and the presence of IL36RN mutations had been found to affect the clinical manifestations and treatment response of GPP.

AREAS COVERED

Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies discussing biologic treatment for GPP with special emphasis on larger studies, pediatric group, pregnant women, and the influence of IL36RN mutation on the effectiveness of biologics.

EXPERT OPINION

The approval of spesolimab for GPP flare treatment marks a new era. However, whether spesolimab will be placed as the treatment of choice remains unknown, considering its higher cost, lack of direct comparison with existing biologics, and uncertain effects on co-existing plaque-type psoriasis. However, the demonstration of numerically better efficacy for patients carrying pathogenic IL36RN mutations suggests the role of pharmacogenetics in the choices of GPP treatment. Future randomized studies are warranted to investigate the effectiveness and safety of biologics for GPP in pediatric and pregnant groups.

Risk of tuberculosis infection and serial changes in interferon-gamma release assays in elderly patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy

Elderly patients constitute a significant proportion of patients with psoriasis. Nonetheless, treatment for older patients is more challenging than that for younger ones. Biologic agents are preferable to other systemic drugs for elderly patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis owing to their high efficacy and favorable tolerability. However, there are limited data on tuberculosis infection risk in elderly patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection, assess the serial interferon-gamma release assay results, and evaluate treatment compliance and adverse effects of latent tuberculosis infection treatment in elderly patients with psoriasis on biologic therapy. In this single-center retrospective study, medical charts of elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) with psoriasis who were treated with a biologic agent (guselkumab, adalimumab, secukinumab, or ustekinumab) between January 2015 and December 2020 were reviewed. We analyzed the results of chest X-rays and those of whole-blood interferon-gamma release assays performed for latent tuberculosis infection screening at baseline (IGRA0) and subsequently at follow-up after initiating biologic therapy (IGRA1). In total, 90 patients underwent IGRA0; 46 (51.11%) of them had latent tuberculosis infection before starting biologic therapy. Overall, four and two patients experienced seroconversion and active tuberculosis during biologic therapy, respectively. The interferon-gamma release assay reversion rate was 29.1%, and the interferon-gamma level significantly decreased in all patients after latent tuberculosis infection treatment (p = 0.004). Latent tuberculosis infection treatment was well tolerated in elderly patients (completion rate, 100%). The risk of latent tuberculosis infection in elderly patients with psoriasis on biologic therapy was comparable to that previously reported for all age groups. However, the active tuberculosis rate was relatively higher.

Lack of reactivation of tuberculosis in patients with psoriasis treated with secukinumab in a real-world setting of latent tuberculosis infection

BACKGROUND

Some biologics for psoriasis, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapies, may re-activate latent tuberculosis (TBC) infection with consequent morbidity and mortality. However, there is a low reported incidence of conversion to positive TBC status among patients with psoriasis treated with second-generation biologic therapies, particularly anti-interleukin (IL)-17 therapies such as secukinumab.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety profile of secukinumab in psoriasis patients with latent TBC infection.

METHODS

Real-life data were collected by retrospective chart review on patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who showed positivity for TBC screening at baseline and underwent secukinumab treatment for psoriasis at six Italian centers. Patients received secukinumab 300 mg at week 0/1/2/3/4, then every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled; 30.5% also had psoriatic arthritis and other comorbidities were common. At baseline, the mean psoriasis duration was 14.5 years. Ten (17%) patients did not undergo prophylaxis before starting secukinumab. Conversely, isoniazid ± rifampicin or rifampicin alone prophylaxis was administered in 49/59 (83.1%) patients. After a mean treatment duration of 84 weeks, there were no cases of TBC reactivation and no unexpected safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

Secukinumab use over an extended period was safe in psoriasis patients with latent TBC, even in patients who did not receive chemoprophylaxis.

Choosing the Appropriate Target for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: TNFα, IL-17, IL-23 or JAK Inhibitors?

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a highly heterogenous disease. Apart from arthritis and psoriasis, other manifestations can also occur, including enthesitis, dactylitis, axial-, nail-, eye- and bowel- involvement. Comorbidities are also frequent in the setting of PsA, with cardiovascular disease and mental-health disorders being the most frequent. The Rheumatologist's arsenal has many different treatment options for treating PsA. Despite their effectiveness, there are some differences in terms of efficacy and safety that might affect clinician's decision for one or the other drug. Comparing biologic DMARDs and JAK-inhibitors, one could say that they have similar effectiveness in terms of musculoskeletal manifestations. However, anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 drugs seem to be more effective for skin manifestations. In contrast, JAK-inhibitors and etanercept might be less effective for these manifestations. Inflammatory bowel disease and uveitis are non-responsive to etanercept and anti-IL-17 drugs. As regards to comorbidities, data are scarce, but future studies will shed light on possible differential effect of bDMARDs or JAK-inhibitors. Safety is always an important drive for choosing the appropriate treatment. Infections are the most common adverse event of these drugs. Etanercept and anti-IL-17 drugs are safer for patients having latent tuberculosis, while herpes zoster is more common in individuals receiving JAK-inhibitors. Finally, venous thromboembolism risk, should be taken into account when JAK-inhibitors are used. In this review, we comparatively present, as outlined above, the various aspects that could affect the choice of the appropriate bDMARD or JAK-inhibitor for the treatment of a PsA patient.

Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Psoriasis and Risk of Infectious Disease

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated skin and joint disease, with a plethora of comorbidities, characterized by a certain genetic predisposition, and a complex pathogenesis based on the IL-23/IL-17 pathway. There is no doubt that the patients affected by psoriasis are more susceptible to infections as well as that the risk of infection is higher in psoriatic subjects than in the general population. The advent of biotechnological agents on the therapeutic arsenal actually available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe patients, given the fact that the severity of the disease is a predictor of the level of infectious risk, has raised the question of whether these ‘new’ drugs could be considered a safer option and how they can be used in selected cases. Old and newer strategies in cases of chronic infectious conditions are reviewed under the light of clinical trials and other studies present in literature.

Association of Secukinumab Treatment With Tuberculosis Reactivation in Patients With Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Ankylosing Spondylitis

Question

What is the association of secukinumab with active tuberculosis (TB) development, TB reactivation, and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) activation?

Findings

In this pooled cohort study of 12 319 patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis, spontaneous reporting of new LTBI while undergoing secukinumab treatment was rare. No active cases of TB or LTBI reactivation were reported.

Meaning

The findings of this study provide a broader understanding of the safety of secukinumab and appear to support its long-term use in chronic systemic inflammatory conditions.

Importance

Approximately one-quarter of the global population have latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and tuberculosis (TB) is accountable for more than 1.5 million deaths annually. Methotrexate, cyclosporine, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may be associated with increased risk of TB and LTBI reactivation, although data are limited on the risks of TB with use of newer biologics.

Objective

To assess the association of secukinumab with reporting of active TB development, TB reactivation, and LTBI activation as an adverse event (AE) in patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This pooled cohort study pooled data from 28 clinical trials of secukinumab used in psoriasis (17 phase 3 or 3b and 2 phase 4 trials), psoriatic arthritis (5 phase 3 trials), and ankylosing spondylitis (4 phase 3 trials). A search of the Novartis Secukinumab Compound Pool Database was conducted for the 28 trials. All trial participants who had received at least 1 approved subcutaneous dose of secukinumab (150 mg or 300 mg) were included. Before randomization in these trials, patients underwent screening for TB. Patients with active TB were excluded, and patients with LTBI were treated according to local guidelines. Data were analyzed from the start of treatment in the individual studies through December 25, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Reporting of active TB or LTBI as an AE over a 5-year period using exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR; incidence rates per 100 patient-years).

Results

A total of 12 319 patients were included, of whom 8819 patients had psoriasis (71.6%; 5930 men [67.2%]; mean [SD] age, of 44.9 [13.5] years), 2523 had psoriatic arthritis (20.5%; 1323 women [52.4%]; mean [SD] age, 48.8 [12.1] years), and 977 had ankylosing spondylitis (7.3%; 658 men [67.3%]; mean [SD] age, 42.3 [11.9] years). In the total population, 684 patients (5.6%) had tested positive for LTBI at screening. Over 5 years, LTBI as an AE during secukinumab treatment was reported in 13 patients (0.1% of 12 319). Of these 13 patients, 6 had a prior positive LTBI test result, and 7 were newly diagnosed as having LTBI. Four of the 7 patients had psoriasis (EAIR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.07), 1 had psoriatic arthritis (EAIR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.11), and 2 had ankylosing spondylitis (EAIR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.28). No cases of active TB were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that LTBI reported as an AE after secukinumab treatment was uncommon and appeared to support the use of secukinumab in chronic systemic inflammatory conditions.

Serial Quantiferon-TB Gold test results in 279 patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy

The risk of active tuberculosis is still a concern in patients receiving biologics. To determine the risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) reactivation by Quantiferon-TB Gold (QFT) assay in psoriatic patients treated with biologics in 11 years' follow-up, along with chest radiography alterations. This retrospective study included 279 patients with plaque-type and/or pustular, or nail psoriasis who were treated with biologics, and had results for ≥2 LTBI tests. The QFT outcomes were defined according to the baseline and the follow-up QFT results; seroconversion as from negative to positive, seroreversion as from positive to negative, persistently seronegative as invariantly negative, persistently seropositive as invariantly positive, and other any result was accepted as indeterminate. Demographic features, the presence and the type of any chest X-ray abnormality was noted during the follow-up. Of 279 baseline QFT tests, the vast majority were negative (n = 193; 69%), with a less of positive (n = 86; 31%). Ten (5.2%) of 193 patients converted from negative to positive QFT status after starting biologic therapy (P < 0.001) during 11 years' follow-up. Although these 10 patients exhibited seroconversion of QFT from negative to positive, only one patient was diagnosed with active TB. There was no statistically significant difference among biologics as regards with QFT seroconversion risk (P = .09). This study showed that 5.2% of patients showed seroconversion. Annual QFT testing remains a necessary and mandatory tool to prevent further TB reactivation in psoriasis patients taking biologic therapy although only one patient was diagnosed with active TB in this cohort.

New generation biologics for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. State of the art and considerations about the risk of infection

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by inflammation of skin (psoriasis) or joints (psoriatic arthritis) or both, resulting from a dysregulation in particular of the T helper (Th)17 functions. There is no available cure for psoriasis, and a life-long treatment is needed to control signs and symptoms. Research interest is high around the newest biological drugs approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and especially drugs blocking the IL-23/IL-17 axis. Our aim is to review the new biological drugs for the treatment of psoriasis and their adverse effects, focusing on the risk of infections.

Dynamics of Cytokine Profile Indicators Changes in Animals with Acute Generalized Peritonitis on the Background of Diabetes Mellitus

In acute peritonitis, any surgical intervention leads to impaired immune protection with the development of postoperative purulent-septic complications, which increases several times the likelihood of death, especially in people with secondary immunodeficiency as a consequence diabetes mellitus.

We aimed to study the dynamics of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine content in rat serum under experimental acute generalized peritonitis on the background of diabetes mellitus.

Fifty-six white rats were used for the study. The determination of the serum cytokine profile was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

When comparing the levels of interleukins between the study groups, a statistically significant increase in the level of proinflammatory cytokines was found in the group of diabetic animals during all experimental periods. In particular, the concentration of interleukin – 1β increased significantly by 94% on day 1 of observation, by 115% on day 3, and by 121% on day 7 compared to the control group. Similarly, a significant increase in TNF-α levels was observed in animals with diabetes. In this group, the most significant increase in the level of TNF-α was recorded on the seventh day of the experiment, and it increased by 3.4 times.

Animals with acute peritonitis on the background of diabetes had a significantly increased concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokines in the serum of all study groups, which confirms their involvement in the pathogenesis of the disease under study.

QuantiFERON TB-gold conversion rate among psoriasis patients under biologics: a 9-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) screening is mandatory for psoriasis biologic treatment. However, evidences regarding TB screening results during biologic treatment are conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of QuantiFERON TB Gold test (QFT) conversion in psoriasis patients during biologics over time.

METHODS

A 9-year single center retrospective study was performed in order to evaluate the rate of QFT conversion in patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis under available biological therapies (anti-TNF-α, IL-12/23, IL-17). For each patient, demographic data, age, gender, comorbidities, previous psoriasis therapy, as well as ongoing treatment type were registered. Five-hundred twenty-six patients (61.2% male, with a mean age of 52.6 ± 13.9 years) treated with biologics were enrolled.

RESULTS

QFT conversion occurred in 6.5% of patients over a mean treatment duration of 3.2 years. On average, QFT conversion occurred after 34.05 months of treatment. Anti-TNF-α drugs, and among them, adalimumab above all (35.5% of all cases), were the most commonly involved treatment during QFT conversion, followed by anti-IL-12/23 (17.6%) and anti-IL-17 (14.7%). However, differences among biologics class or single biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab, ustekinumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab) did not approach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual TB screening is important in psoriasis patients under biologic treatment in order to avoid possible latent TB infection reactivation. Indeed, our data showed that even in a low TB prevalence country like Italy, QFT may convert over time in psoriasis patients under biologics in 6.5% of the cases.

Tuberculosis and targeted synthetic or biologic DMARDs, beyond tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) have an increased risk for tuberculosis (TB). The use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and glucocorticoids in these patients has been associated with an increased prevalence of latent TB reactivation. Over the last few years, several biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), other than TNFi (e.g. rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, secukinumab) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) [e.g. apremilast, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors] have been used for the treatment of patients with ARD. For many of these drugs, especially the newer ones like JAK inhibitors or antibodies against interleukin (IL)-23, most data stem from randomized clinical trials and few are available from real life clinical experience. We sought to review the current evidence for TB risk in patients with ARD treated with tsDMARDs or bDMARDs, other than TNFi. It seems that some of these drugs are associated with a lower TB risk, indirectly compared with TNFi treatment. In fact, it appears that rituximab, apremilast and inhibitors of IL-17 and IL-23 might be safer, while more data are needed for JAK inhibitors. As seen in TNFi, risk for TB is more pronounced in TB-endemic areas. Screening for latent TB must precede initiation of any tsDMARDs or bDMARDs. The growing use of non-TNFi agents has raised the need for more real-life studies that would compare the risk for TB between TNFi and other treatment modalities for ARD. Knowledge about the TB-safety profile of these drugs could help in the decision of drug choice in patients with confirmed latent TB infection or in TB endemic areas.

Switching biologics in psoriasis - practical guidance and evidence to support

INTRODUCTION

Advances of biologic agents have changed the treatment paradigm of psoriasis to higher efficacy and better quality of life. However, the demand for biologic switch is increasing due to patient's greater expectation and decreasing efficacy in long-term use. Also, biologic-induced adverse effects necessitate the switching of biologics.

AREAS COVERED

This review article was divided into two parts. The first part focused on the biologic switch due to lack of efficacy. The second part provided switching suggestions related to adverse effects.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Biologic switch in psoriasis was mainly due to lack of efficacy, and the subsequent biologic agent was usually given at the next scheduled time point without washout period. In pivotal randomized controlled trials, patients with poor response to TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab achieved better efficacy after switching to IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors. In addition, real-world data showed that intra-class switch could still achieve a 50%-80% of PASI 75 response in individuals with anti-IL-17 failure histories. As for the biologic switch due to adverse effects, washout period was recommended and transition to a biologic agent with different modes of action was preferred, especially class-specific adverse events.

The Role of Th17 Cells and IL-17 in Th2 Immune Responses of Allergic Conjunctivitis

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a common allergic disease that is often associated with the onset of rhinitis or asthma. The incidence of AC has increased significantly in recent years possibly due to air pollution and climate warming. AC seriously affects patients' quality of life and work efficiency. Th (T-helper) 2 immune responses and type I hypersensitivity reactions are generally considered the basis of occurrence of AC. It has been found that new subpopulations of T-helper cells, Th17 cells that produce interleukin-17 (IL-17), play an important role in the Th2-mediated pathogenesis of conjunctivitis. Studies have shown that Th17 cells are involved in a variety of immune inflammation, including psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and asthma. However, the role of Th17 and IL-17 in AC is unclear. This paper will focus on how T-helper 17 cells and interleukin-17 are activated in the Th2 immune response of allergic conjunctivitis and how they promote the Th2 immune response of AC.

A drug safety evaluation of risankizumab for psoriasis

Introduction: Risankizumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-23A, interfering with the IL-23/17 axis that plays a crucial role in keratinocyte proliferation. In 2019, risankizumab was approved globally for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.Areas covered: The safety profile of risankizumab for the treatment of psoriasis is assessed in this review. A literature search was performed on 18 October 2019, and additional data from pooled safety analyses were evaluated.Expert opinion: Drugs blocking the IL-23 pathway are the most recently approved treatment for psoriasis, and risankizumab seems to be the most effective one among the three IL-23 blockers approved. Risankizumab was generally well tolerated in the clinical trials and was found to be relatively safe. The safety profile of risankizumab is generally similar in clinical trials compared to adalimumab and ustekinumab. In a subset of patients with latent tuberculosis, no active tuberculosis developed after risankizumab treatment for 55 weeks without tuberculosis prophylaxis. The combination of safety, efficacy and less frequent injection (every 12 weeks) make risankizumab an attractive new choice for individuals with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, the long-term impact of anti-drug antibodies (24%) observed in pivotal studies as well as safety concerns in those with viral infections, hepatitis, malignancies and those in endemic tuberculosis areas, await further studies.